Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 1 cited by

A single diode-embedded quantum-dot nanocavity emits both tunable highly entangled photon pairs and nearly Fourier-limited single photons.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 05:13 UTC pith:672RGYAG

load-bearing objection Solid experimental integration paper: first real diode-CBR that delivers both tunable high-concurrence pairs and near-FT-limited single photons from one QD, with the usual FDTD-vs-data gap but no load-bearing flaw.

arxiv 2607.11494 v1 pith:672RGYAG submitted 2026-07-13 quant-ph physics.optics

A diode nanocavity for fast, efficient and tunable emission of highly entangled photon pairs and Fourier-transform-limited single photons

Ievgen Brytavskyi , Thomas Oberleitner , Christian Weidinger , Maximilian Aigner , Gabriel Undeutsch , Tobias Steindl , Johannes Reindl , Ailton Garcia Jr.
show 11 more authors
Melina Peter Christian Schimpf Santanu Manna Michele B. Rota Quirin Buchinger Sven H\"ofling Tobias Huber-Loyola Rinaldo Trotta Tobias M. Krieger Eva Sch\"oll Armando Rastelli
This is my paper
classification quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum dotsentangled photon pairscircular Bragg gratingPurcell enhancementFourier-limited photonsdiode nanocavityHong-Ou-Mandelquantum-confined Stark effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Photonic quantum technologies need on-demand sources that can supply both highly entangled photon pairs and pure, indistinguishable single photons without trade-offs among brightness, speed, charge noise, and spectral control. This paper shows that a GaAs quantum dot placed inside a p-i-n diode circular Bragg grating resonator can deliver both from the same device. Under two-photon excitation the biexciton–exciton cascade yields polarisation-entangled pairs with raw concurrence above 0.89, nearly blinking-free operation, extraction efficiency up to 0.55, and Purcell factor around 8, all while the emission wavelength can be tuned over 1.6 nm by the quantum-confined Stark effect. From the same quantum dot the negative trion, addressed resonantly, produces single photons whose linewidth is only a few percent above the Fourier limit and whose Hong–Ou–Mandel visibility reaches 0.95. The combination of electrical charge control, broadband cavity enhancement and wavelength tunability removes several long-standing compromises that have limited semiconductor quantum light sources.

Core claim

A GaAs quantum dot deterministically integrated into a p-i-n diode circular-Bragg-grating resonator simultaneously generates wavelength-tunable entangled photon pairs (raw concurrence >0.89, fidelity >0.94, on-time fraction >0.9 over a 1.6 nm exciton tuning range, extraction efficiency up to 0.55, Purcell factor ~8) and, from the same emitter, nearly Fourier-transform-limited single photons from the negative trion (linewidth only 1.05 times the transform limit, raw HOM visibility 0.951).

What carries the argument

The diode circular Bragg grating (diode-CBR): a thin p-i-n membrane containing a GaAs quantum dot, patterned into a circular Bragg grating with conductive bridges so that voltage can be applied across the central disk while still providing broadband Purcell enhancement and high extraction into a high-NA collection optic.

Load-bearing premise

The reported Purcell factors of roughly 8 rest on comparing measured lifetimes to estimated bulk lifetimes under the same electric field while assuming non-radiative recombination is negligible.

What would settle it

Measure the same quantum-dot transitions under identical electric-field conditions in an unpatterned region of the identical diode membrane; if the lifetime ratio is substantially smaller than 8, the claimed cavity enhancement is overstated.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a GaAs quantum-dot source deterministically integrated into a p-i-n diode circular Bragg grating resonator. The same device is shown to generate wavelength-tunable polarisation-entangled XX–X photon pairs with raw concurrence C > 0.89 (fidelity F_|Φ+> > 0.94), on-time fraction η_blink > 0.9 over a 1.6 nm exciton tuning range, extraction efficiency η_ext up to 0.55(6), and Purcell factors ~8, while the negative trion of the identical QD yields nearly Fourier-transform-limited single photons (Γ/Γ0 = 1.05) with raw HOM visibility V_HOM = 0.951(4). Characterisation rests on standard quantum-optics measurements: voltage-dependent spectra, lifetime fits, g^(2), Michelson |g^(1)|, full quantum-state tomography with maximum-likelihood reconstruction, and co-/cross-polarised HOM interference, all under resonant two-photon or resonance-fluorescence excitation.

Significance. If the multi-metric performance holds, the work removes a long-standing trade-off among extraction efficiency, Purcell enhancement, charge-noise suppression and electrical tunability in a single, fibre-compatible nanostructure. The combination of high raw concurrence maintained over a useful tuning window, near-unity on-time fraction under TPE, and near-FT-limited trion emission from the same diode-CBR is of clear practical value for entanglement-based QKD, remote entanglement swapping and spin–photon interfaces. The experimental observables are obtained with conventional, well-documented techniques and include multi-photon corrections and uncertainty estimates, giving the platform claim solid empirical footing.

minor comments (5)
  1. The abstract and main text quote slightly different corrected concurrence bounds (>0.91 vs 0.943); a single consistent pair of raw/corrected values would avoid confusion.
  2. Fig. 1d,e: experimental F_P and η_ext points are shown only for two devices; a brief statement of how many CBRs were screened and the yield of high-performance devices would help readers assess reproducibility.
  3. Methods IV G: the unitary transformation used to align the reconstructed density matrix to |Φ+> is standard but could be referenced more explicitly to the SI or a short equation for completeness.
  4. The residual discrepancy between simulated (F_P ~21, η_ext ~0.8) and measured values is acknowledged; a short quantitative estimate of the contribution of QD displacement or surface scattering would strengthen the discussion.
  5. Typographical consistency: “Fourier-transform-limited” versus “Fourier-limited” and occasional missing spaces around units (e.g., “1.6 nm”) appear in a few places.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central claims rest on direct experimental observables (tomography, g^(2), HOM, Michelson linewidth, count-rate efficiency) that do not reduce to design inputs or self-citations by construction.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental device demonstration. Entanglement metrics (C, F_|Φ+|) are obtained from maximum-likelihood reconstruction of the two-photon density matrix measured via 36 polarization-projected cross-correlations; V_HOM from co- vs cross-polarized coincidence histograms in an unbalanced Mach–Zehnder; linewidth from Michelson |g^(1)(τ)| fitted to a Lorentzian; η_ext from calibrated single-photon count rates after setup-loss characterization; η_blink from long-timescale g^(2) bunching amplitudes. These are apparatus-referenced observables, not quantities forced by normalization, self-defined fits, or uniqueness theorems. Geometry is optimized via particle-swarm FDTD maximizing the product FOM = F_P · η_ext · η_mode, but the performance claims are the subsequent measured values (with acknowledged simulation–experiment gaps attributed to unmodeled losses and fabrication imperfections). Purcell factors are estimated by lifetime ratios to bulk under estimated field (assuming negligible non-radiative rates); this is a model-dependent conversion, not a circular prediction. Self-citations to prior CBR/diode work by overlapping authors supply methods, growth recipes, and context but are not load-bearing for the multi-metric results reported here. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggling that collapses the central claims appear.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental device demonstration. Load-bearing content is measured performance, not a derivation from free parameters. Free parameters are geometric design choices and standard fit amplitudes/timescales. Axioms are standard solid-state and quantum-optics domain assumptions. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • CBR geometry (central-disk radius, ring period, trench width)
    Particle-swarm optimized in FDTD for target 785 nm; fabricated values (295 nm / 303 nm / 88 nm) set cavity resonance and thus which QDs couple strongly. Central claims use measured, not simulated, performance, but device selection depends on these choices.
  • Bulk reference lifetimes under estimated electric field
    Used to convert measured T1 into F_P (F_max_P≈8.2/7.9/7.7). Values and field estimation are external inputs; errors propagate directly into the Purcell-factor claim.
  • Blinking fit amplitudes A1,A2 and timescales τ1,τ2
    Double-exponential fit to long-timescale g^(2) defines η_blink=1/(1+A1+A2). Standard analysis but free parameters of the fit.
  • HOM correction factors (ε, R, T, g̃^(2)(0))
    Visibility correction formula uses measured classical visibility and beamsplitter imbalance; small free parameters that raise raw 0.951 to corrected 0.988.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Biexciton–exciton cascade with (near-)degenerate bright excitons produces a polarization-entangled |Φ+⟩-like two-photon state; residual FSS and AC-Stark shift degrade time-averaged concurrence.
    Standard cascade entanglement model used throughout Sec. II.A and for interpreting C and F.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-radiative recombination is negligible when estimating Purcell factor from lifetime ratios to bulk under the same electric field.
    Explicitly stated in Sec. II.A; required for F_P numbers but not independently verified in the device.
  • domain assumption Quantum-confined Stark effect redshifts X more than XX, enabling continuous wavelength tuning and charge-state control in a p-i-n diode.
    Used for the 1.6 nm tuning claim and charge-plateau selection (Fig. 1g, Fig. 2).
  • standard math Michelson fringe visibility vs delay yields the first-order coherence time; Lorentzian lineshape implies Γ=2ℏ/T2 comparable to Fourier limit ℏ/T1.
    Standard Fourier spectroscopy used for the Γ/Γ0=1.05 claim (Sec. II.B).
  • standard math Maximum-likelihood reconstruction of the two-photon density matrix from 36 polarization projections, followed by a global unitary to align to |Φ+⟩, yields concurrence and fidelity without changing entanglement degree.
    Methods IV.G; unitary is for reporting F_|Φ+⟩ only.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 26774 in / 3830 out tokens · 49771 ms · 2026-07-14T05:13:03.071652+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deterministic sources of entangled photon pairs and indistinguishable photons are expected to play a key role in photonic quantum technologies. Semiconductor quantum dots are promising candidates due to their on-demand emission and compatibility with nanophotonic structures. However, current implementations face trade-offs between extraction efficiency, Purcell enhancement, as well as charge noise that causes blinking and degrades indistinguishability. Here we demonstrate a tunable nano-optoelectronic device based on a quantum dot embedded in a p-i-n diode circular-Bragg-grating-resonator and featuring extraction efficiencies up to 0.55(6) and Purcell-factor of $\sim$8. The device generates wavelength-tunable entangled photon pairs with suppressed blinking and raw (corrected) concurrence > 0.89 (0.91) over a range of 1.6 nm. The very same source also emits single, nearly Fourier-limited and highly indistinguishable photons with raw (corrected) $\mathcal{V}_{\text{HOM}}$ = 0.951(4) (0.988(6)). These results demonstrate a viable platform for semiconductor quantum photonics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11494 by Ailton Garcia Jr., Armando Rastelli, Christian Schimpf, Christian Weidinger, Eva Sch\"oll, Gabriel Undeutsch, Ievgen Brytavskyi, Johannes Reindl, Maximilian Aigner, Melina Peter, Michele B. Rota, Quirin Buchinger, Rinaldo Trotta, Santanu Manna, Sven H\"ofling, Thomas Oberleitner, Tobias Huber-Loyola, Tobias M. Krieger, Tobias Steindl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Device structure and basic optical and electrical performance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Near blinking-free emission of wavelength tuneable entangled photons under pulsed resonant two-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Indistinguishable, nearly Fourier-transform-limited single photons under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Picosecond-resolved entanglement distribution over an urban free-space channel

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A laser-synchronization system with sub-50 ps timing was used to distribute a quantum-dot entangled photon pair over a 270 m urban free-space link, preserving an 89% fully entangled fraction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Gisin and R

    N. Gisin and R. Thew, Quantum communication, Nature Photonics1, 165 (2007)

    2007

  2. [2]

    H. Wang, T. C. Ralph, J. J. Renema, C.-Y. Lu, and J.- W. Pan, Scalable photonic quantum technologies, Nature Materials24, 1883 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Defienne, W

    H. Defienne, W. P. Bowen, M. Chekhova, G. B. Lemos, D. Oron, S. Ramelow, N. Treps, and D. Faccio, Advances in quantum imaging, Nature Photonics18, 1024–1036 (2024)

    2024

  4. [5]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. N. Alexander, B. Al- tieri, M. F. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Q. Bar- agiola, J. E. Bourassa, R. S. Chadwick, I. Charania, H. Chen, M. J. Collins, P. Contu, N. D’Arcy, G. Dauph- inais, R. De Prins, D. Deschenes, I. Di Luch, S. Duque, P. Edke, S. E. Fayer, S. Ferracin, H. Ferretti, J. Gefaell, S. Glancy, C. Gonz´ alez-A...

    2025

  5. [6]

    Alexander, A

    K. Alexander, A. Benyamini, D. Black, D. Bon- neau, S. Burgos, B. Burridge, H. Cable, G. Campbell, G. Catalano, A. Ceballos, C.-M. Chang, S. S. Choudhury, C. J. Chung, F. Danesh, T. Dauer, M. Davis, E. Dudley, P. Er-Xuan, J. Fargas, A. Farsi, C. Fenrich, J. Frazer, M. Fukami, Y. Ganesan, G. Gibson, M. Gimeno-Segovia, S. Goeldi, P. Goley, R. Haislmaier, S....

    2025

  6. [7]

    Flamini, N

    F. Flamini, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Photonic quantum information processing: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 016001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [8]

    A. Dutt, A. Mohanty, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, Non- linear and quantum photonics using integrated optical materials, Nature Reviews Materials9, 321–346 (2024)

    2024

  8. [9]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology12, 1026 (2017)

    2017

  9. [10]

    Lodahl, Quantum-dot based photonic quantum net- works, Quantum Science and Technology3, 013001 (2017)

    P. Lodahl, Quantum-dot based photonic quantum net- works, Quantum Science and Technology3, 013001 (2017)

    2017

  10. [11]

    Heindel, J.-H

    T. Heindel, J.-H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, Quantum dots for photonic quantum in- formation technology, Advances in Optics and Photonics 15, 613 (2023)

    2023

  11. [12]

    Michler and S

    P. Michler and S. L. Portalupi,Semiconductor Quantum Light Sources: Fundamentals, Technologies and Devices (De Gruyter, 2024)

    2024

  12. [13]

    Santori, D

    C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, G. S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, Indistinguishable photons from a single- photon device, Nature419, 594 (2002)

    2002

  13. [14]

    L. Zhai, G. N. Nguyen, C. Spinnler, J. Ritzmann, M. C. L¨ obl, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. Javadi, and R. J. War- burton, Quantum interference of identical photons from remote gaas quantum dots, Nature nanotechnology17, 829 (2022)

    2022

  14. [15]

    Huber, M

    D. Huber, M. Reindl, S. F. Covre da Silva, C. Schimpf, J. Mart´ ın-S´ anchez, H. Huang, G. Piredda, J. Ed- linger, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Strain-Tunable GaAs Quantum Dot: A Nearly Dephasing-Free Source of En- tangled Photon Pairs on Demand, Physical Review Let- ters121, 033902 (2018)

    2018

  15. [16]

    C. L. Salter, R. M. Stevenson, I. Farrer, C. a. Nicoll, D. a. Ritchie, and a. J. Shields, An entangled-light- emitting diode, Nature465, 594 (2010)

    2010

  16. [17]

    Cogan, Z.-E

    D. Cogan, Z.-E. Su, O. Kenneth, and D. Gershoni, De- terministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state, Nature Photonics 10.1038/s41566-022- 01152-2 (2023)

    doi:10.1038/s41566-022- 2023

  17. [18]

    Ding, Y.-P

    X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.-Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang, M.-C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient lin- ear optical quantum computing, Nature Photonics19, 387 (2025)

    2025

  18. [19]

    M. B. Rota, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, M. Bec- caceci, J. Neuwirth, H. Huet, N. Horov´ a, G. Lovicu, G. Ronco, S. F. Covre da Silva, G. Pettinari, M. Mocza la- Dusanowska, C. Kohlberger, S. Manna, S. Stroj, J. Fre- und, X. Yuan, C. Schneider, M. Jeˇ zek, S. H¨ ofling, F. Basso Basset, T. Huber-Loyola, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, A source of entangled ph...

    2024

  19. [20]

    Laneve, G

    A. Laneve, G. Ronco, M. Beccaceci, P. Barigelli, F. Sa- lusti, N. Claro-Rodriguez, G. De Pascalis, A. Suprano, L. Chiaudano, E. Sch¨ oll, L. Hanschke, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, S. F. Covre da Silva, J. Neuwirth, S. Stroj, S. H¨ ofling, T. Huber-Loyola, M. A. Usuga Castaneda, G. Carvacho, N. Spagnolo, M. B. Rota, F. Basso Bas- set, A. Rastelli, F. Sciar...

    2025

  20. [21]

    Strobel, M

    T. Strobel, M. Vyvlecka, I. Neureuther, T. Bauer, M. Sch¨ afer, S. Kazmaier, N. L. Sharma, R. Joos, J. H. Weber, C. Nawrath, W. Nie, G. Bhayani, C. Hopfmann, C. Becher, P. Michler, and S. L. Porta- lupi, Telecom-wavelength quantum teleportation using frequency-converted photons from remote quantum dots, Nature Communications16, 10027 (2025)

    2025

  21. [22]

    Beccaceci, G

    M. Beccaceci, G. Ronco, F. Cienzo, P. Bassetti, A. Laneve, F. B. Basset, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, F. Salusti, B. S. Damasceno, S. Kuhn, S. F. C. da Silva, S. Stroj, K. D. J¨ ons, S. H¨ ofling, T. Huber-Loyola, A. Ras- telli, M. B. Rota, and R. Trotta, All-photonic entan- glement swapping with remote quantum dots (2025), arXiv:2512.10651 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [23]

    Schimpf, M

    C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, D. Huber, B. Lehner, S. F. C. D. Silva, S. Manna, M. Vyvlecka, P. Walther, and A. Rastelli, Quantum cryptography with highly en- tangled photons from semiconductor quantum dots, Sci- ence Advances7, eabe8905 (2021)

    2021

  23. [24]

    F. B. Basset, M. Valeri, E. Roccia, V. Muredda, D. Po- derini, J. Neuwirth, N. Spagnolo, M. B. Rota, G. Car- vacho, F. Sciarrino, and R. Trotta, Quantum key distri- bution with entangled photons generated on demand by a quantum dot, Science Advances7, eabe6379 (2021)

    2021

  24. [25]

    W. B. Gao, P. Fallahi, E. Togan, J. Miguel-Sanchez, and A. Imamoglu, Observation of entanglement between a quantum dot spin and a single photon, Nature491, 426 (2012)

    2012

  25. [26]

    De Greve, P

    K. De Greve, P. L. McMahon, L. Yu, J. S. Pelc, C. Jones, C. M. Natarajan, N. Y. Kim, E. Abe, S. Maier, C. Schneider,et al., Complete tomography of a high- fidelity solid-state entangled spin–photon qubit pair, Nature communications4, 2228 (2013)

    2013

  26. [27]

    Z. Luo, S. Sun, A. Karasahin, A. S. Bracker, S. G. Carter, M. K. Yakes, D. Gammon, and E. Waks, A spin–photon interface using charge-tunable quantum dots strongly coupled to a cavity, Nano Letters19, 7072 (2019)

    2019

  27. [28]

    M. L. Chan, A. Tiranov, M. H. Appel, Y. Wang, L. Mid- olo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, On-chip spin-photon entanglement based on photon-scattering of a quantum dot, npj Quantum Information9, 49 (2023)

    2023

  28. [29]

    M. H. Appel, A. Ghorbal, N. Shofer, L. Zaporski, S. Manna, S. F. C. da Silva, U. Haeusler, C. L. Gall, A. Rastelli, D. A. Gangloff, and M. Atat¨ ure, A many- body quantum register for a spin qubit, Nature Physics 21, 368 (2025)

    2025

  29. [30]

    Davan¸ co, C

    M. Davan¸ co, C. S. Hellberg, S. Ates, A. Badolato, and K. Srinivasan, Multiple time scale blinking in InAs quantum dot single-photon sources, Physical Review B 89, 161303 (2014)

    2014

  30. [31]

    Reigue, A

    A. Reigue, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, C. Gomez Carbonell, C. Ulysse, K. Merghem, S. Guilet, R. Hostein, and V. Voliotis, Res- onance fluorescence revival in a voltage-controlled semi- conductor quantum dot, Applied Physics Letters112, 073103 (2018), arXiv:1710.09732 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [32]

    Warburton, C

    R. Warburton, C. Schaflein, D. Haft, F. Bickel, A. Lorke, K. Karrai, J. Garcia, W. Schoenfeld, and P. Petroff, Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring, Nature405, 926 (2000)

    2000

  32. [33]

    M. C. L¨ obl, I. S¨ ollner, A. Javadi, T. Pregnolato, R. Schott, L. Midolo, A. V. Kuhlmann, S. Stobbe, A. D. 12 Wieck, P. Lodahl, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, Narrow optical linewidths and spin pumping on charge- tunable close-to-surface self-assembled quantum dots in an ultrathin diode, Physical Review B96, 10.1103/phys- revb.96.165440 (2017)

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2017

  33. [34]

    Ludwig, J

    A. Ludwig, J. H. Prechtel, A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, S. R. Valentin, R. J. Warburton, and A. D. Wieck, Ultra- low charge and spin noise in self-assembled quantum dots, Journal of Crystal Growth477, 193–196 (2017)

    2017

  34. [35]

    Schimpf, S

    C. Schimpf, S. Manna, S. F. C. da Silva, M. Aigner, and A. Rastelli, Entanglement-based quantum key dis- tribution with a blinking-free quantum dot operated at a temperature up to 20 k, Advanced Photonics3, 10.1117/1.AP.3.6.065001 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.3.6.065001 2021

  35. [36]

    L. Zhai, M. C. L¨ obl, G. N. Nguyen, J. Ritzmann, A. Javadi, C. Spinnler, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, Low-noise GaAs quantum dots for quantum photonics, Nature Communications11, 4745 (2020)

    2020

  36. [37]

    Zaporski, N

    L. Zaporski, N. Shofer, J. H. Bodey, S. Manna, G. Gil- lard, M. H. Appel, C. Schimpf, S. F. Covre da Silva, J. Jarman, G. Delamare, G. Park, U. Haeusler, E. A. Chekhovich, A. Rastelli, D. A. Gangloff, M. Atat¨ ure, and C. Le Gall, Ideal refocusing of an optically active spin qubit under strong hyperfine interactions, Nature Nanotechnology18, 257 (2023)

    2023

  37. [38]

    C. P. Michaels, J. A. Mart´ ınez, R. Debroux, R. A. Parker, A. M. Stramma, L. I. Huber, C. M. Purser, M. Atat¨ ure, and D. A. Gangloff, Multidimensional cluster states us- ing a single spin-photon interface coupled strongly to an intrinsic nuclear register, Quantum5, 565 (2021)

    2021

  38. [39]

    R. B. Patel, A. J. Bennett, I. Farrer, C. A. Nicoll, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots, Nature Photonics4, 632 (2010), arXiv:0911.3997

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [40]

    Trotta, E

    R. Trotta, E. Zallo, E. Magerl, O. G. Schmidt, and A. Rastelli, Independent control of exciton and biexciton energies in single quantum dots via electroelastic fields, Physical Review B88, 155312 (2013)

    2013

  40. [41]

    Undeutsch, M

    G. Undeutsch, M. Aigner, A. J. J. Garcia, J. Reindl, M. Peter, S. Mader, C. Weidinger, S. F. Covre da Silva, S. Manna, E. Sch¨ oll, and A. Rastelli, Electric-Field Con- trol of Photon Indistinguishability in Cascaded Decays in Quantum Dots, Nano Letters25, 7121 (2025)

    2025

  41. [42]

    Davan¸ co, M

    M. Davan¸ co, M. T. Rakher, D. Schuh, A. Badolato, and K. Srinivasan, A circular dielectric grating for vertical ex- traction of single quantum dot emission, Applied Physics Letters99, 041102 (2011)

    2011

  42. [43]

    A. K. Nowak, S. L. Portalupi, V. Giesz, O. Gazzano, C. Dal Savio, P.-F. Braun, K. Karrai, C. Arnold, L. Lanco, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, and P. Senellart, De- terministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source, Nature Communications5, 10.1038/ncomms4240 (2014)

    doi:10.1038/ncomms4240 2014

  43. [44]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 347 (2015)

    2015

  44. [45]

    Somaschi, V

    N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. D. Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Ant´ on, J. Demory, C. G´ omez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lema´ ıtre, A. Auffeves, A. G. White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state, Nature Photonics10, 340 (2016)

    2016

  45. [46]

    J. Liu, R. Su, Y. Wei, B. Yao, S. F. C. d. Silva, Y. Yu, J. Iles-Smith, K. Srinivasan, A. Rastelli, J. Li, and X. Wang, A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishabil- ity, Nature Nanotechnology14, 586–593 (2019)

    2019

  46. [47]

    H. Wang, H. Hu, T. H. Chung, J. Qin, X. Yang, J. P. Li, R. Z. Liu, H. S. Zhong, Y. M. He, X. Ding, Y. H. Deng, Q. Dai, Y. H. Huo, S. H¨ ofling, C. Y. Lu, and J. W. Pan, On-Demand Semiconductor Source of En- tangled Photons Which Simultaneously Has High Fidel- ity, Efficiency, and Indistinguishability, Physical Review Letters122, 1 (2019), arXiv:1903.06071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [48]

    Rickert, D

    L. Rickert, D. A. Vajner, M. von Helversen, J. Schall, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, H. Liu, S. Li, H. Ni, Z. Niu, et al., High purcell enhancement in quantum-dot hybrid circular bragg grating cavities for ghz clock rate genera- tion of indistinguishable photons, ACS Photonics12, 464 (2024)

    2024

  48. [49]

    J. Liu, K. Konthasinghe, M. Davan¸ co, J. Lawall, V. Anant, V. Verma, R. Mirin, S. W. Nam, J. D. Song, B. Ma, Z. S. Chen, H. Q. Ni, Z. C. Niu, and K. Srinivasan, Single self-assembled inas/gaas quantum dots in photonic nanostructures: The role of nanofab- rication, Physical Review Applied9, 10.1103/physrevap- plied.9.064019 (2018)

    doi:10.1103/physrevap- 2018

  49. [50]

    F. Hu, Z. Cao, C. Zhang, X. Wang, and M. Xiao, Defect- induced photoluminescence blinking of single epitaxial in- gaas quantum dots, Scientific reports5, 8898 (2015)

    2015

  50. [51]

    X. Y. Wang, W. Q. Ma, J. Y. Zhang, G. J. Salamo, M. Xiao, and C. K. Shih, Photoluminescence inter- mittency of ingaas/gaas quantum dots confined in a planar microcavity, Nano Letters5, 1873 (2005), pMID: 16218701

    2005

  51. [52]

    J. Yang, T. Fandrich, F. Benthin, R. Keil, N. L. Sharma, W. Nie, C. Hopfmann, O. G. Schmidt, M. Zopf, and F. Ding, Photoneutralization of charges in gaas quantum dot based entangled photon emitters, Phys. Rev. B105, 115301 (2022)

    2022

  52. [53]

    Schall, M

    J. Schall, M. Deconinck, N. Bart, M. Florian, M. von Helversen, C. Dangel, R. Schmidt, L. Bremer, F. Bopp, I. H¨ ullen, C. Gies, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, S. Rodt, J. J. Finley, F. Jahnke, A. Ludwig, and S. Reitzenstein, Bright electrically controllable quantum-dot-molecule devices fabricated by in situ electron-beam lithography, Ad- vanced Quantum Technolo...

    2021

  53. [54]

    Singh, D

    H. Singh, D. Farfurnik, Z. Luo, A. S. Bracker, S. G. Carter, and E. Waks, Optical transparency induced by a largely purcell enhanced quantum dot in a polarization- degenerate cavity, Nano Letters22, 7959 (2022), pMID: 36129824

    2022

  54. [55]

    Wijitpatima, N

    S. Wijitpatima, N. Auler, P. Mudi, T. Funk, A. Barua, B. Shrestha, J. Schall, I. Limame, S. Rodt, D. Reuter, and S. Reitzenstein, Bright electrically contacted circu- lar bragg grating resonators with deterministically integ- rated quantum dots, ACS Nano18, 31834–31845 (2024)

    2024

  55. [56]

    Buchinger, S

    Q. Buchinger, S. Betzold, S. H¨ ofling, and T. Huber- Loyola, Optical properties of circular bragg gratings with labyrinth geometry to enable electrical contacts, Applied Physics Letters122, 111110 (2023)

    2023

  56. [57]

    Barbiero, G

    A. Barbiero, G. Shooter, J. Skiba-Szymanska, J. Huang, L. Ravi, J. I. Davies, B. Ramsay, D. J. P. Ellis, A. J. Shields, T. M¨ uller, and R. M. Stevenson, Purcell- enhanced and tunable single-photon emission from tele- com quantum dots in circular photonic crystal resonat- 13 ors, ACS Photonics12, 6607–6613 (2025)

    2025

  57. [58]

    Wolters, G

    J. Wolters, G. Buser, A. Horsley, L. B´ eguin, A. J¨ ockel, J.-P. Jahn, R. J. Warburton, and P. Treutlein, Simple atomic quantum memory suitable for semiconductor quantum dot single photons, Physical Review Letters 119, 060502 (2017)

    2017

  58. [59]

    C. Heyn, A. Stemmann, T. K¨ oppen, C. Strelow, T. Kipp, M. Grave, S. Mendach, and W. Hansen, Highly uniform and strain-free gaas quantum dots fabricated by filling of self-assembled nanoholes, Applied Physics Letters94, 183113 (2009)

    2009

  59. [60]

    Gurioli, Z

    M. Gurioli, Z. Wang, A. Rastelli, T. Kuroda, and S. San- guinetti, Droplet epitaxy of semiconductor nanostruc- tures for quantum photonic devices, Nature Materials18, 799 (2019)

    2019

  60. [61]

    Milanova, A

    M. Milanova, A. Mintairov, V. Rumyantsev, and K. Smekalin, Spectral characteristics of gaas solar cells grown by lpe, Journal of Electronic Materials28, 35 (1999)

    1999

  61. [62]

    T. M. Krieger, C. Weidinger, T. Oberleitner, G. Un- deutsch, M. B. Rota, N. Tajik, M. Aigner, Q. Buchinger, C. Schimpf, A. J. J. Garcia, S. F. Covre da Silva, S. H¨ ofling, T. Huber-Loyola, R. Trotta, and A. Rastelli, Postfabrication tuning of circular bragg resonators for en- hanced emitter-cavity coupling, ACS Photonics11, 596 (2024)

    2024

  62. [63]

    S. F. Covre da Silva, G. Undeutsch, B. U. Lehner, S. Manna, T. M. Krieger, M. Reindl, C. Schimpf, R. Trotta, and A. Rastelli, Gaas quantum dots grown by droplet etching epitaxy as quantum light sources, Ap- plied Physics Letters119, 10.1063/5.0057070 (2021)

    doi:10.1063/5.0057070 2021

  63. [64]

    M¨ uller, S

    M. M¨ uller, S. Bounouar, K. D. J¨ ons, M. Gl¨ assl, and P. Michler, On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs, Nature Photonics8, 224 (2014), arXiv:1308.4257

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [65]

    Hanschke, K

    L. Hanschke, K. A. Fischer, S. Appel, D. Lukin, J. Wi- erzbowski, S. Sun, R. Trivedi, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J. J. Finley, and K. M¨ uller, Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability, npj Quantum Inform- ation4, 1 (2018), arXiv:1801.01672

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [66]

    J.-P. Jahn, M. Munsch, L. B´ eguin, A. V. Kuhlmann, M. Renggli, Y. Huo, F. Ding, R. Trotta, M. Reindl, O. G. Schmidt, A. Rastelli, P. Treutlein, and R. J. Warburton, An artificial Rb atom in a semiconductor with lifetime-limited linewidth, Phys. Rev. B92, 245439 (2015), arXiv:1508.06461 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [67]

    Peniakov, Q

    G. Peniakov, Q. Buchinger, M. Helal, S. Betzold, Y. Reum, M. B. Rota, G. Ronco, M. Beccaceci, T. M. Krieger, S. F. C. Da Silva,et al., Polarized and unpolar- ized emission from a single emitter in a bullseye reson- ator, Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2300835 (2024)

    2024

  67. [68]

    D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, Measurement of qubits, Physical Review A64, 052312 (2001)

    2001

  68. [69]

    Fognini, A

    A. Fognini, A. Ahmadi, M. Zeeshan, J. T. Fokkens, S. J. Gibson, N. Sherlekar, S. J. Daley, D. Dalacu, P. J. Poole, K. D. J¨ ons, V. Zwiller, and M. E. Reimer, Dephasing free photon entanglement with a quantum dot, ACS Photon- ics , acsphotonics.8b01496 (2019)

    2019

  69. [70]

    A. J. Hudson, R. M. Stevenson, A. J. Bennett, R. J. Young, C. A. Nicoll, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Coherence of an Entangled Exciton-Photon State, Physical Review Letters99, 266802 (2007)

    2007

  70. [71]

    Seidelmann, C

    T. Seidelmann, C. Schimpf, T. K. Bracht, M. Cosac- chi, A. Vagov, A. Rastelli, D. E. Reiter, and V. M. Axt, Two-Photon Excitation Sets Limit to Entangled Photon Pair Generation from Quantum Emitters, Physical Re- view Letters129, 193604 (2022)

    2022

  71. [72]

    Laneve, M

    A. Laneve, M. B. Rota, F. Basso Basset, M. Beccaceci, V. Villari, T. Oberleitner, Y. Reum, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, R. Prasad,et al., Wavevector-resolved po- larization entanglement from radiative cascades, Nature communications16, 6209 (2025)

    2025

  72. [73]

    Juska, I

    G. Juska, I. Ranjbar Jahromi, F. Mattana, S. Varo, V. Dimastrodonato, and E. Pelucchi, Biexciton initializa- tion by two-photon excitation in site-controlled quantum dots: The complexity of the antibinding state case, Ap- plied Physics Letters117, 134001 (2020)

    2020

  73. [74]

    Simon and J.-P

    C. Simon and J.-P. P. Poizat, Creating single time- bin-entangled photon pairs, Physical Review Letters94, 030502 (2005)

    2005

  74. [75]

    Huber, A

    T. Huber, A. Predojevi´ c, H. Zoubi, H. Jayakumar, G. S. Solomon, and G. Weihs, Measurement and modification of biexciton-exciton time correlations, Optics Express21, 9890 (2013)

    2013

  75. [76]

    Sch¨ oll, L

    E. Sch¨ oll, L. Schweickert, L. Hanschke, K. D. Zeuner, F. Sbresny, T. Lettner, R. Trivedi, M. Reindl, S. F. Covre Da Silva, R. Trotta, J. J. Finley, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, K. M¨ uller, A. Rastelli, V. Zwiller, and K. D. J¨ ons, Crux of using the cascaded emission of a three-level quantum ladder system to generate indistinguishable photons, Physical Review Lett...

    arXiv 2020

  76. [77]

    A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, D. Brunner, A. Ludwig, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, and R. J. Warburton, A dark- field microscope for background-free detection of reson- ance fluorescence from single semiconductor quantum dots operating in a set-and-forget mode, Review of Scientific Instruments84, 10.1063/1.4813879 (2013), arXiv:1303.2055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.4813879 2013

  77. [78]

    F. T. Pedersen, Y. Wang, C. T. Olesen, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, M. C. L¨ obl, R. J. Warburton, L. Mid- olo, R. Uppu, and P. Lodahl, Near Transform-Limited Quantum Dot Linewidths in a Broadband Photonic Crys- tal Waveguide, ACS Photonics7, 2343 (2020)

    2020

  78. [79]

    Basso Basset, M

    F. Basso Basset, M. B. Rota, M. Beccaceci, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, J. Neuwirth, H. Huet, S. Stroj, S. F. Covre da Silva, G. Ronco, C. Schimpf, S. H¨ ofling, T. Huber-Loyola, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Signatures of the Optical Stark Effect on Entangled Photon Pairs from Resonantly Pumped Quantum Dots, Physical Re- view Letters131, 166901 (2023)

    2023

  79. [80]

    J.-Y. Yan, P. C. A. Hagen, H.-G. Babin, W. E. I. Sha, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, C.-Y. Jin, V. M. Axt, D.-W. Wang, M. Cygorek, and F. Liu, Robust entangled photon generation enabled by single-shot floquet driving (2025), arXiv:2504.02753 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [81]

    Piccinini, A

    C. Piccinini, A. Rodek, A. A. Madigawa, A. G. Jr., S. F. C. da Silva, M. A. Jacobsen, L. Vannucci, G. Weihs, A. Rastelli, V. Remesh, N. Gregersen, and B. Munkhbat, Exciton and biexciton preparation via coherent swing-up excitation in a gaas quantum dot embedded in micropil- lar cavity (2025), arXiv:2510.21428 [physics.optics]

    arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.