Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 94 references

A Rabi gate built from three Jaynes-Cummings blocks lets circuit-QED hardware simulate strong electron-phonon models without encoding bosons as qubits.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 05:03 UTC pith:SU7GGEDD

load-bearing objection Clean, hardware-aware digital-analog circuits for Hubbard-Holstein and Yukawa-SYK that actually use the resonator as a boson; the noise model is the only real soft spot. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.11516 v1 pith:SU7GGEDD submitted 2026-07-13 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el

Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Fermion-Phonon Models in Circuit QED

Tim Bode , Riccardo Roma , Stefan Schmitz , Alessandro Ciani , Dmitriy S. Shapiro , Dmitry Bagrets , Frank K. Wilhelm This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el PACS 03.67.Ac03.67.Lx42.50.Pq71.38.-k05.45.Mt
keywords circuit QEDdigital-analog quantum simulationquantum Rabi gateHubbard-Holstein modelYukawa-SYK modelelectron-phonon couplingvariational Hamiltonian ansatzquantum chaos
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Electron-phonon models are hard for pure-qubit simulators because every bosonic mode must be truncated and encoded, which is expensive. This paper shows that microwave resonators can stand in for the phonons while transmons encode the fermions, and that a single engineered Rabi gate is enough to generate the strong hybrid interactions. The gate is assembled from three resonant Jaynes-Cummings pulses interleaved with ordinary single-qubit rotations, so it works even when the physical coupling is only moderate. With that primitive the authors compile circuits for the Hubbard-Holstein model and for the Yukawa-SYK model, extract non-Poissonian phonon number distributions near a critical point, and recover random-matrix signatures of quantum chaos. They also supply a variational ansatz that mirrors the Hamiltonian and measurement protocols that use controlled displacements and phase rotations already available on superconducting chips. The result is a concrete, near-term route to digital-analog simulation of fermion-phonon physics on planar circuit-QED devices.

Core claim

The second-order Trotter Rabi gate (three resonant Jaynes-Cummings segments plus single-qubit rotations) is a universal hybrid primitive that, together with standard digital gates, implements both Trotter evolution and variational ground-state preparation for the Hubbard-Holstein and Yukawa-SYK Hamiltonians on planar circuit-QED hardware, allowing direct observation of nonclassical phonon statistics and random-matrix chaos signatures.

What carries the argument

The qubit-resonator Rabi gate of Eq. (21)/Fig. 1: a second-order Trotter product of three resonant Jaynes-Cummings gates interleaved with digital X and Rz rotations that effectively realizes strong electron-phonon coupling from weak physical hardware couplings.

Load-bearing premise

That present-day relaxation times and gate durations still leave the prepared states coherent enough for the non-Poissonian phonon histograms and the dip-ramp-plateau chaos signals to remain visible after measurement.

What would settle it

Run the N=2 Hubbard-Holstein variational circuit (or the minimal Yukawa-SYK Floquet circuit) on a device whose measured T1 and gate times match the paper’s Table II; if the extracted phonon histogram is Poissonian or the correlator/form-factor lacks a clear linear ramp, the claim that near-term hardware can see the signatures fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Planar circuit-QED chips can host Hubbard-Holstein dimers without multi-qubit boson encodings, cutting qubit overhead.
  • Nonclassical phonon number distributions near the fluctuation-dominated critical region become accessible via a simple Hadamard-test Fourier protocol.
  • Random-matrix dip-ramp-plateau structure in two-point correlators and spectral form factors can be measured for small Yukawa-SYK instances already on present hardware.
  • The same Rabi primitive plus controlled displacements supplies the mixed qubit-resonator observables needed for a variational energy functional.
  • Floquet realizations of the model can exhibit chaos signatures even when the continuous-time Hamiltonian remains integrable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same three-JC construction can be reused for any Holstein-type or Yukawa-type vertex that appears in molecular or lattice-gauge models once the Jordan-Wigner strings are supplied.
  • If residual ZZ crosstalk or flux-pulse distortion exceeds the paper’s idealization, the second-order cancellation inside the Rabi gate will degrade first, offering a diagnostic before full many-body signals are lost.
  • Embedding the cluster solver inside a larger variational-cluster or dynamical-mean-field loop would let the same hardware contribute to thermodynamic-limit phase diagrams of electron-phonon materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a digital-analog circuit-QED architecture for simulating strongly correlated fermion-phonon models. Fermions are encoded in transmon qubits and bosons in microwave resonators, avoiding costly finite-dimensional qubit encodings of bosonic modes. The central primitive is a second-order Trotter Rabi gate (Eq. 21, Fig. 1) assembled from three resonant Jaynes-Cummings blocks interleaved with single-qubit rotations; first-order controlled-X displacements are also discussed. Using this gate, the authors construct Trotter circuits and a variational Hamiltonian ansatz for the Hubbard-Holstein model (Secs. III–IV) and Trotter circuits for the Yukawa-SYK model (Sec. V). Exact-diagonalization phase diagrams, non-Poissonian phonon histograms, VHA fidelities (including a Lindblad noise model in App. B), and dip-ramp-plateau chaos correlators/form factors (Fig. 17) are presented for small systems (N=2 dimers, M=N=2 Yukawa-SYK). Measurement protocols based on Hadamard tests with controlled phase rotations and displacements are given.

Significance. If the construction works as claimed, the paper supplies a concrete, hardware-native route to electron-phonon and Majorana-phonon models on planar circuit-QED platforms without binary/unary boson encodings. The algebraic decomposition of the Rabi gate (Eqs. 12–21), the Jordan-Wigner compilations for both HH and Yukawa-SYK, the controlled-Rabi construction (App. C), and the explicit VHA and measurement circuits are clean and reusable. Numerical checks against exact diagonalization for phonon statistics and small-system chaos signatures strengthen the proposal. The work is a solid theory contribution that could guide near-term experiments, provided the noise and connectivity assumptions hold.

major comments (2)
  1. Appendix B and Table III: the claim that nonclassical phonon histograms and usable VHA states survive near-term hardware rests on T1 = 50 µs (qubits), 200 µs (resonators) and gate times 100 ns (CNOT)/200 ns (Rabi). With these values F_VHA^(diss) already falls to ~0.83 and energies degrade substantially (e.g. point A: -0.759 → -0.317). Residual ZZ crosstalk, flux-pulse dynamical phases (Fig. 3), or modestly shorter T1 would wash out the non-Poissonian features of Fig. 7/18 and the dip-ramp-plateau of Fig. 17 before they can be measured. A short sensitivity scan (or an explicit statement of the T1/gate-time threshold below which the signatures disappear) is needed to make the experimental-relevance claim load-bearing rather than optimistic.
  2. Sec. III B / Fig. 5 and Sec. V B / Fig. 13: the architecture assumes a single terminal qubit coupled to each resonator and relies on long SWAP chains (or all-to-all connectivity) to move states. For N>2 the SWAP overhead scales poorly and multiplies the decoherence exposure already quantified in App. B. The manuscript should either quantify the depth for a few larger N or state clearly that the proposal is intended only for few-site clusters (VCA-style) where the overhead remains tolerable.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 6 caption and surrounding text: the small Zeeman splitting used to lift degeneracy is stated only in the caption; a brief remark in the main text would help readers reproduce the phase diagram.
  2. Eq. (59) vs Eq. (21): the VHA Rabi gate drops the time-dependent Rz phases of the Trotter gate. A one-sentence reminder that this is intentional (postulated ansatz, not Trotter evolution) would avoid confusion.
  3. Fig. 17: the short-time oscillations are attributed to residual integrability of the continuous-time model; a brief note that they are expected to diminish for N≥3 (as stated later in the text) would make the figure self-contained.
  4. Related work: Refs. [30, 31, 35] are cited, but a short explicit contrast of gate sets (Rabi vs beam-splitter/SNAIL) in the introduction would sharpen the novelty claim relative to those concurrent proposals.
  5. Typographical: “DIGIT AL-ANALOG”, “T ransmon”, “V ARIA TIONAL” etc. in section headings should be cleaned; “Schr¨ odinger” and similar accented characters appear inconsistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Rabi-gate Trotter construction, Jordan-Wigner compilations, VHA, and chaos diagnostics are self-contained algebraic and numerical results, not forced by definition or self-citation loops.

full rationale

The paper's central constructive claim is the second-order Trotter decomposition of the quantum Rabi model into three resonant Jaynes-Cummings blocks interleaved with single-qubit rotations (Eqs. 12-13, 18, 21 and Fig. 1). This is a standard Lie-Trotter identity applied to H_R = (H_JC + H_AJC)/2; the interaction-picture reduction and the controlled-Rabi construction in Appendix C are pure algebra. The Hubbard-Holstein and Yukawa-SYK circuits follow by ordinary Jordan-Wigner mapping plus the same Rabi primitive (Secs. III B, V B). Phase diagrams, non-Poissonian phonon histograms, VHA fidelities, and dip-ramp-plateau correlators are obtained by independent exact diagonalization and circuit simulation (Figs. 6-7, 17-18, Tables I-III); no free parameters are fitted to the same data that are later called predictions. Self-citations (e.g. to the authors' prior Dicke-Ising work [36] or to the experimental JC-gate demonstration [32]) supply methodological context or hardware precedent; they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems that force the present results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard circuit-QED Hamiltonians, the rotating-wave and two-level approximations, second-order Trotter error, and the assumption that existing planar hardware can realize the required resonant JC pulses and dispersive controlled displacements. No new particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are only the usual model couplings and the hardware T1/gate-time numbers used for the noise study.

free parameters (3)
  • Trotter step τ relative to coupling g = 1/(2g)
    Chosen as τ = 1/(2g) for the chaos numerics (just below the estimated Trotterization threshold τc ≃ 1/g); the qualitative chaos signal depends on remaining below threshold.
  • Hardware relaxation times and gate durations = 50 µs / 200 µs / 100 ns / 200 ns
    T1(qubit)=50 µs, T1(res)=200 µs, τCNOT=100 ns, τRabi=200 ns used in Appendix B Lindblad simulations; these set the reported fidelity drop from >95 % to ~83 %.
  • Model parameters for phase diagrams (N=2 dimer) = ω0/V=5, U/V=0.25
    ω0/V=5, U/V=0.25, g0=g, small Zeeman and site-energy offsets chosen to produce the fluctuation-dominated stripe; results are illustrative for that slice.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave and two-level approximations for the transmon-resonator system remain valid for the gate durations used.
    Invoked in Sec. II B to reduce the circuit Hamiltonian to the JC form that implements the analog blocks.
  • standard math Second-order Trotter decomposition of the Rabi Hamiltonian incurs only O(τ³) error per step and the Floquet Hamiltonian stays close to the target for τ ≲ 1/g.
    Used throughout Secs. II A 2, III B, V B and justified by reference to the Trotterization-threshold literature.
  • domain assumption A single terminal qubit is capacitively coupled to each resonator; SWAP networks can move any qubit state to that terminal without prohibitive error.
    Architecture assumption stated in Sec. III B and Fig. 5 for implementing site-dependent electron-phonon terms.
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner mapping of complex and Majorana fermions onto Pauli strings is exact and the resulting multi-qubit strings can be compiled with CNOT/CZ ladders.
    Standard fermionic encoding used in Secs. III B and V B.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 35234 in / 3142 out tokens · 34054 ms · 2026-07-14T05:03:00.339618+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gate-based digital quantum simulations offer an exciting new paradigm for studying the many-body physics of strongly correlated systems. In this context, electron-phonon models are challenging for qubit-only quantum simulators, as bosonic degrees of freedom require costly finite-dimensional encodings. Here, we elaborate on an alternative approach based on a digital-analog circuit QED architecture, where fermions are encoded in transmon qubits while bosons are represented directly by microwave resonators. The central building block of this framework is a qubit-resonator Rabi gate that emulates strong electron-phonon coupling and can be implemented through a sequence of resonant Jaynes-Cummings gates interleaved with layers of single-qubit rotations. Using this Rabi gate as the fundamental unitary operation, we construct quantum circuits for the Hubbard-Holstein and Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, which describe, respectively, strongly correlated electrons coupled to phonons and phonon-mediated interactions among Majorana fermions. We further demonstrate how nonclassical phonon physics and signatures of quantum chaos in these models can be probed through circuit simulations, and develop measurement and variational protocols tailored to near-term superconducting quantum hardware.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11516 by Alessandro Ciani, Dmitriy S. Shapiro, Dmitry Bagrets, Frank K. Wilhelm, Riccardo Roma, Stefan Schmitz, Tim Bode.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Circuit diagram for the Rabi gate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Equivalent electric circuit of the coupled transmon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Circuit diagram for implementing a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Circuit implementation of the gate block [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Ground-state phase diagram showing the fermion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Histograms of the non-Poissonian phonon distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Hadamard-test protocol for measuring [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Gate sequence for the VHA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Quantum circuit preparing the trial wave function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Transmon-resonator architecture tailored for simu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Quantum circuits for measuring the unitary oper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Quantum circuit representing the Yukawa-SYK gates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Typical behaviour of a generic two-point correlator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Hadamard test protocol measuring the real and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Quantum circuit representing the qubit-controlled Rabi gate; see Appendix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Circuit-based simulation data for quantum-chaotic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Histograms of the phonon distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    (5) into eq

    Rabi gate: First-order approximation and controlled-X displacement The first-order approximation to the exact Rabi gate, ˆSR = ˆS(1) R +O(τ 2), is obtained from the Lie-Trotter de- composition e−i ˆHRτ =e −i ˆH0τ e−i ˆHXτ +O(τ 2).(5) Substituting eq. (5) into eq. (4) and performing straight- forward algebra yields ˆS(1) R (tp +τ, t p) = exp −i gτ 2 (ˆae−i...

  2. [2]

    Rabi gate: Second-order approximation. Jaynes-Cummings gate We now turn to a more accurate construction of the Rabi gate based on a second-order Trotter decom- position, ˆSR = ˆS(2) R +O(τ 3), originally proposed in Refs. [29, 32]. The key idea is to decompose the Rabi Hamiltonian into the sum of two non-commuting contri- butions, ˆHR = 1 2 ˆHJC + ˆHAJC ....

  3. [3]

    In this limit, the system Hamilto- 5 resonatortransmon coupler transmon coupler resonator FIG

    Dispersive regime TheCD X gate can be implemented using a fixed- frequency transmon operated in the dispersive regime, ˜g≪ |∆|, where ∆ =ω tr −ω res denotes the transmon- resonator detuning. In this limit, the system Hamilto- 5 resonatortransmon coupler transmon coupler resonator FIG. 2. Equivalent electric circuit of the coupled transmon- resonator syste...

  4. [4]

    (17) is implemented using the tu- nable-frequency transmon architecture shown in Fig

    Resonant regime The JC gate in eq. (17) is implemented using the tu- nable-frequency transmon architecture shown in Fig. 2, where the transmon frequencyω tr(t) is controlled in time by an external magnetic flux Φe(t)[32, 45]. By applying a flux pulse such that the resonance conditionω tr(t) =ω res is satisfied, the system Hamiltonian reduces to ˆHsys =ω r...

  5. [5]

    The central idea of the protocol is to measurez Φ = Re h tr ˆρeiΦˆa†ˆa i , which is the real part of the expectation value of the phonon phase-rotation operatore iΦˆa†ˆa

    Discrete Fourier transform To obtain the distributionρ n,n, we use a Hadamard- test protocol adapted to a dispersively coupled auxiliary qubit and resonator. The central idea of the protocol is to measurez Φ = Re h tr ˆρeiΦˆa†ˆa i , which is the real part of the expectation value of the phonon phase-rotation operatore iΦˆa†ˆa. Rewriting the trace inz Φ an...

  6. [6]

    Quantum technologies–from basic research to market,

    Quantum circuit We now describe a circuit for measuring the value ofzΦ entering the discrete Fourier transform in eq. (50). This protocol combines the ideas of Wigner tomography [32, 62, 63] and Ramsey interferometry. First, we consider the interacting part of the disper- sive Hamiltonian in eq. (23), which can be written as ˆHdisp = 2χˆa†ˆa|1⟩⟨1|. Evolut...

    2018

  7. [7]

    H. P. H. Fr¨ ohlich and S. Zienau, XX. Properties of slow electrons in polar materials, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41, 221 (1950)

    1950

  8. [8]

    Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part II

    T. Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part II. The “small” polaron, Annals of Physics8, 343 (1959)

    1959

  9. [9]

    Dahnovsky, Ab initio electron propagators in molecules with strong electron-phonon interaction

    Y. Dahnovsky, Ab initio electron propagators in molecules with strong electron-phonon interaction. I. Phonon averages, The Journal of Chemical Physics126, 234111 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    Marsiglio and J

    F. Marsiglio and J. P. Carbotte, Electron-Phonon Su- perconductivity, inSuperconductivity: Conventional and Unconventional Superconductors, edited by K. H. Benne- mann and J. B. Ketterson (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 73–162

    2008

  11. [11]

    Nosarzewski, E

    B. Nosarzewski, E. W. Huang, P. M. Dee, I. Esterlis, B. Moritz, S. A. Kivelson, S. Johnston, and T. P. De- vereaux, Superconductivity, charge density waves, and bipolarons in the Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B103, 235156 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  13. [13]

    Berger, P

    E. Berger, P. Val´ aˇ sek, and W. von der Linden, Two- dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B52, 4806 (1995)

    1995

  14. [14]

    N. C. Costa, K. Seki, S. Yunoki, and S. Sorella, Phase di- agram of the two-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model, Commun. Phys.3, 80 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Esterlis and J

    I. Esterlis and J. Schmalian, Cooper pairing of incoherent electrons: An electron-phonon version of the Sachdev-Ye- Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B100, 115132 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics21, 467 (1982)

    1982

  17. [17]

    Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    1996

  18. [18]

    Weimer, M

    H. Weimer, M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. B¨ uchler, A rydberg quantum simulator, Nat. Phys.6, 382 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    Bassman Oftelie, M

    L. Bassman Oftelie, M. Urbanek, M. Metcalf, J. Carter, A. F. Kemper, and W. A. de Jong, Simulating quantum materials with digital quantum computers, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 043002 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Bravyi, A

    S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low- overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature627, 778 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Miessen, D

    A. Miessen, D. J. Egger, I. Tavernelli, and G. Mazzola, Benchmarking digital quantum simulations above hun- dreds of qubits using quantum critical dynamics, PRX Quantum5, 040320 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Macridin, P

    A. Macridin, P. Spentzouris, J. Amundson, and R. Harnik, Electron-phonon systems on a universal quan- tum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 110504 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Macridin, P

    A. Macridin, P. Spentzouris, J. Amundson, and R. Harnik, Digital quantum computation of fermion- boson interacting systems, Phys. Rev. A98, 042312 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on digi- tal quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future chal- lenges, Nat

    B. Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on digi- tal quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future chal- lenges, Nat. Commun.15, 2123 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Castillo-Moreno, T

    C. Castillo-Moreno, T. S´ epulcre, T. Hillmann, K. R. Amin, M. Kervinen, and S. Gasparinetti, Experimen- tal observation of multimode quantum phase transitions in a superconducting Bose-Hubbard simulator (2025), arXiv:2508.20116 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    W. Qin, A. F. Kockum, C. S. Mu˜ noz, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and matter, Phys. Rep. 1078, 1 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007). 20

    2007

  31. [31]

    N. P. D. Sawaya, T. Menke, T. H. Kyaw, S. Johri, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and G. G. Guerreschi, Resource- efficient digital quantum simulation ofd-level systems for photonic, vibrational, and spin-sHamiltonians, npj Quantum Inf.6, 49 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    Q. Xie, H. Zhong, M. T. Batchelor, and C. Lee, The quantum Rabi model: solution and dynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.50, 113001 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Niemczyk, F

    T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. H¨ ummer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys.6, 772 (2010)

    2010

  34. [34]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, J

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, B. Peropadre, J.-L. Orgiazzi, M. A. Yurtalan, R. Belyansky, C. M. Wilson, and A. Lupascu, Ultrastrong coupling of a single artificial atom to an electromagnetic continuum in the nonpertur- bative regime, Nat. Phys.13, 39 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Mezzacapo, U

    A. Mezzacapo, U. Las Heras, J. S. Pedernales, L. Di- Carlo, E. Solano, and L. Lamata, Digital Quantum Rabi and Dicke Models in Superconducting Circuits, Sci. Rep. 4, 7482 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Kumar, N

    S. Kumar, N. N. Hegade, A.-M. Visuri, B. A. Bhargava, J. F. R. Hernandez, E. Solano, F. Albarr´ an-Arriagada, and G. A. Barrios, Digital-analog quantum computing of fermion-boson models in superconducting circuits, npj Quantum Inf.11, 43 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Lepp¨ akangas, P

    J. Lepp¨ akangas, P. Stadler, D. Golubev, R. Reiner, J.- M. Reiner, S. Zanker, N. Wurz, M. Renger, J. Ver- jauw, D. Gusenkova, S. Pogorzalek, F. Vigneau, P. Yang, W. Kindel, H.-S. Ku, F. Deppe, and M. Marthaler, Quan- tum algorithms for simulating systems coupled to bosonic modes using a hybrid resonator-qubit quantum computer (2025), arXiv:2503.11507 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    N. K. Langford, R. Sagastizabal, M. Kounalakis, C. Dickel, A. Bruno, F. Luthi, D. J. Thoen, A. Endo, and L. DiCarlo, Experimentally simulating the dynam- ics of quantum light and matter at deep-strong coupling, Nat. Commun.8, 1715 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    A. T. Than, S. V. Kadam, V. Vikramaditya, N. H. Nguyen, X. Liu, Z. Davoudi, A. M. Green, and N. M. Linke, Observation of quantum-field-theory dy- namics on a spin-phonon quantum computer (2025), arXiv:2509.11477 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Y. Liu, S. Singh, K. C. Smith, E. Crane, J. M. Mar- tyn, A. Eickbusch, A. Schuckert, R. D. Li, J. Sinanan- Singh, M. B. Soley, T. Tsunoda, I. L. Chuang, N. Wiebe, and S. M. Girvin, Hybrid oscillator-qubit quantum pro- cessors: Instruction set architectures, abstract machine models, and applications, PRX Quantum7, 010201 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Crane, K

    E. Crane, K. C. Smith, T. Tomesh, A. Eickbusch, J. M. Martyn, S. K¨ uhn, L. Funcke, M. A. De- Marco, I. L. Chuang, N. Wiebe, A. Schuckert, and S. M. Girvin, Hybrid oscillator-qubit quantum proces- sors: Simulating fermions, bosons, and gauge fields (2024), arXiv:2409.03747 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    D. S. Shapiro, Y. Weber, T. Bode, F. K. Wilhelm, and D. Bagrets, Digital-analog simulations of Schr¨ odinger cat states in the Dicke-Ising model, Phys. Rev. A112, 042412 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    T. J. Stavenger, E. Crane, K. Smith, C. T. Kang, S. M. Girvin, and N. Wiebe, Bosonic qiskit (2022), arXiv:2209.11153 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Vool and M

    U. Vool and M. Devoret, Introduction to quantum elec- tromagnetic circuits, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl.45, 897 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    Rasmussen, K

    S. Rasmussen, K. Christensen, S. Pedersen, L. Kris- tensen, T. Bækkegaard, N. Loft, and N. Zinner, Super- conducting Circuit Companion—an Introduction with Worked Examples, PRX Quantum2, 040204 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Ciani, D

    A. Ciani, D. P. DiVincenzo, and B. M. Terhal,Lecture Notes on Quantum Electrical Circuits(TU Delft OPEN Publishing, Delft, 2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004)

    2004

  48. [48]

    Campagne-Ibarcq, A

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys- Geller, N. E. Frattini, V. V. Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature584, 368 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Eickbusch, V

    A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nat. Phys.18, 1464 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsiout- sios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. De- voret, Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even, Nature616, 50 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Valadares, A

    F. Valadares, A. Dorogov, T. Krisnanda, M. C. Loke, N.-N. Huang, P. Song, and Y. Y. Gao, Flux-activated resonant control of a bosonic quantum memory (2026), arXiv:2602.18122 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    S´ en´ echal, D

    D. S´ en´ echal, D. Perez, and D. Plouffe, Cluster perturba- tion theory for Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B66, 075129 (2002)

    2002

  53. [53]

    Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach to systems of correlated electrons, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems32, 429 (2003)

    M. Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach to systems of correlated electrons, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems32, 429 (2003)

    2003

  54. [54]

    Potthoff, M

    M. Potthoff, M. Aichhorn, and C. Dahnken, Variational Cluster Approach to Correlated Electron Systems in Low Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 206402 (2003)

    2003

  55. [55]

    Payeur and D

    A. Payeur and D. S´ en´ echal, Variational cluster approx- imation study of the one-dimensional Holstein-Hubbard model at half filling, Phys. Rev. B83, 033104 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Wecker, M

    D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, Progress to- wards practical quantum variational algorithms, Phys. Rev. A92, 042303 (2015)

    2015

  57. [57]

    Bauer, D

    B. Bauer, D. Wecker, A. J. Millis, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Cor- related Materials, Phys. Rev. X6, 031045 (2016)

    2016

  58. [58]

    C. Cade, L. Mineh, A. Montanaro, and S. Stanisic, Strategies for solving the Fermi-Hubbard model on near- term quantum computers, Phys. Rev. B102, 235122 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    S. Endo, I. Kurata, and Y. O. Nakagawa, Calculation of the Green’s function on near-term quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033281 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    Bishop, D

    G. Bishop, D. Bagrets, and F. K. Wilhelm, Quantum al- gorithm for Green’s-function measurements in the Fermi- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A111, 062610 (2025). 21

    2025

  61. [61]

    Wecker, M

    D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, N. Wiebe, B. K. Clark, C. Nayak, and M. Troyer, Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062318 (2015)

    2015

  62. [62]

    V. N. Popov and S. Fedotov, The functional-integration method and diagram technique for spin systems, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz94, 183 (1988)

    1988

  63. [63]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    2003

  64. [64]

    Eastham and P

    P. Eastham and P. Littlewood, Bose condensation of cav- ity polaritons beyond the linear regime: The thermal equilibrium of a model microcavity, Phys. Rev. B64, 235101 (2001)

    2001

  65. [65]

    E. G. Dalla Torre, Y. Shchadilova, E. Y. Wilner, M. D. Lukin, and E. Demler, Dicke phase transition without total spin conservation, Phys. Rev. A94, 061802 (2016)

    2016

  66. [66]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the Dicke Model: From Equilib- rium to Nonequilibrium, and Vice Versa, Adv. Quantum Technol.2, 1800043 (2019)

    2019

  67. [67]

    D. S. Shapiro, W. V. Pogosov, and Y. E. Lozovik, Uni- versal fluctuations and squeezing in a generalized Dicke model near the superradiant phase transition, Phys. Rev. A102, 023703 (2020)

    2020

  68. [68]

    L. G. Lutterbach and L. Davidovich, Method for Direct Measurement of the Wigner Function in Cavity QED and Ion Traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2547 (1997)

    1997

  69. [69]

    Vlastakis, G

    B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. De- voret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Deterministically Encod- ing Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schr¨ odinger Cat States, Science342, 607 (2013)

    2013

  70. [70]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevit- sky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature566, 513 (2019)

    2019

  71. [71]

    Marcus and S

    E. Marcus and S. Vandoren, A new class of SYK-like models with maximal chaos, J. High Energy Phys.2019, 166

    2019

  72. [72]

    Wang, Solvable Strong-Coupling Quantum-Dot Model with a Non-Fermi-Liquid Pairing Transition, Phys

    Y. Wang, Solvable Strong-Coupling Quantum-Dot Model with a Non-Fermi-Liquid Pairing Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 017002 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016)

    2016

  74. [74]

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, S. Sachdev, and G. Tarnopolsky, Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, J. High En- ergy Phys.2020, 157

    2020

  75. [75]

    P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, and P. Abbamonte, Stranger than metals, Science377, eabh4273 (2022)

    2022

  76. [76]

    Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory: A short review, Ann

    F. Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory: A short review, Ann. Phys417, 168102 (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    Hauck, M

    D. Hauck, M. J. Klug, I. Esterlis, and J. Schmalian, Eliashberg equations for an electron–phonon version of the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model: Pair breaking in non- Fermi liquid superconductors, Ann. Phys.417, 168120 (2020)

    2020

  78. [78]

    Esterlis, H

    I. Esterlis, H. Guo, A. A. Patel, and S. Sachdev, Large- N theory of critical Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B103, 235129 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    H. Guo, A. A. Patel, I. Esterlis, and S. Sachdev, Large-N theory of critical Fermi surfaces. II. Conductivity, Phys. Rev. B106, 115151 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    Inkof, K

    G.-A. Inkof, K. Schalm, and J. Schmalian, Quantum crit- ical Eliashberg theory, the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev supercon- ductor and their holographic duals, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 1

Showing first 80 references.