Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 77 references

A closed-form Debye-model formula for Tc recovers both the exponential weak-coupling and square-root ultra-strong-coupling limits of the isotropic Eliashberg equations and tracks hydride data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 00:59 UTC pith:DEOEPZOO

load-bearing objection Usable Debye-based Tc formula that matches its own numerics and tracks hydride data; the gap ansatz is fitted, so treat the 6.6% MRE as calibrated rather than fully independent. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.12213 v1 pith:DEOEPZOO submitted 2026-07-13 cond-mat.supr-con

Analytical solution of the Eliashberg equations for strong-coupling superconductivity in hydrides

Tomas J. Escamilla , Chumin Wang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Eliashberg theoryelectron-phonon interactionstrong-coupling regimehydride superconductorsDebye modelcritical temperatureanalytical solution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper supplies a practical analytical expression for the superconducting critical temperature within the isotropic Eliashberg theory, using the Debye phonon spectrum instead of the Einstein model. By adopting a simple frequency-dependent ansatz for the gap and interpolating between the analytically derived weak-coupling exponential and ultra-strong-coupling square-root asymptotes, the authors obtain a single formula that matches fully self-consistent numerical solutions across a wide grid of coupling strengths and Coulomb pseudopotentials. Applied to YH6 and a broader set of hydrides, the formula produces Tc values that scale consistently with ab-initio calculations and experiment, often closer than the classic McMillan-Allen-Dynes expression. The result gives theorists and high-throughput screeners a fast, transparent estimate of Tc from a single Debye frequency extracted from the electron-phonon spectral function, without repeated numerical iteration of the Eliashberg equations.

Core claim

Within the Debye model the isotropic Eliashberg equations admit a closed-form Tc that interpolates between an exponential weak-coupling formula and a square-root ultra-strong-coupling formula; the interpolated expression reproduces self-consistent numerics to roughly 6.5 percent mean relative error over a dense grid of λ0 and μ* and yields hydride Tc values consistent with ab-initio and experimental trends.

What carries the argument

The interpolated analytical solution (Eq. 21), built from a Lorentzian-like gap ansatz Δ(iωn)=Δ0/(1+ωn²/Ω²) with fixed scale λΔ=0.7, a Debye spectral function that defines an effective Debye frequency from the integrated α²F, and a smooth weight that switches from the weak-coupling exponential to the ultra-strong square-root form.

Load-bearing premise

The superconducting gap is forced to follow one specific frequency shape whose single free scale is fixed by fitting numerics inside a limited coupling window; if that shape fails outside the window the whole closed form collapses.

What would settle it

Compute fully self-consistent isotropic Eliashberg Tc for a Debye spectrum at several points with λ0 > 3 or with a markedly non-Debye α²F (for example a multi-peak hydride spectrum) and check whether the analytical formula still stays within roughly 10 percent of the numerical value.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single Debye frequency extracted from any ab-initio α²F immediately yields a usable first estimate of Tc without solving the Matsubara equations.
  • High-throughput searches for new hydrides can pre-screen candidates with the closed form before committing to expensive numerical Eliashberg runs.
  • The same interpolation structure can serve as a warm start that accelerates iterative numerical solvers.
  • The formula supplies an explicit upper-bound estimate of Tc even in the ultra-strong-coupling regime where earlier analytic expressions are unreliable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the Debye frequency is taken from the electron-phonon spectrum rather than the bare phonon density of states, the formula already folds in some material-specific coupling information that pure phonon-frequency averages miss.
  • Extending the same gap ansatz and interpolation idea to the anisotropic Eliashberg equations could give quick estimates for multi-band or non-s-wave hydrides without full Brillouin-zone numerics.
  • If phonon anharmonicity mainly renormalizes the effective Debye cutoff, the present formula may remain usable once that renormalized cutoff is inserted, offering a cheap way to explore anharmonic corrections.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a closed-form analytical expression (Eq. 21) for the superconducting critical temperature Tc from the isotropic Eliashberg equations under the Debye model. Starting from a concise derivation of the equations, it introduces a Lorentzian-like gap ansatz Δ(iωn)=Δ0/(1+ωn^{2}/Ω^{2}) with Ω^{2}=λ0/λΔ, approximates the electron-phonon kernel algebraically (Eq. A1), obtains asymptotic weak-coupling (exponential, Eq. 19/A13) and ultra-strong-coupling (square-root, Eq. 20/A15) solutions via digamma asymptotics and three-term truncation, and interpolates them. The formula is validated against self-consistent numerical solutions of the Debye-Eliashberg equations on a 28 imes20 (λ0,μ*) grid (MRE 6.557%, Fig. 1), applied to YH6 (comparing to experiment and McMillan-Allen-Dynes while varying the DFPT broadening), and shown to scale consistently with ab-initio and experimental Tc for eight additional hydrides plus a broader set of 64 compounds (Figs. 4-5). A coherence-length estimate for YH6 is also given.

Significance. If the central formula holds as a robust wide-range solution, it supplies a compact, Debye-based alternative to the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula that correctly recovers both the exponential weak-coupling and square-root ultra-strong-coupling limits without empirical spectral-moment corrections. This is practically useful for high-throughput pre-screening of hydride candidates (where full Matsubara solutions remain costly) and pedagogically valuable for building intuition about retardation and strong-coupling effects. Explicit strengths include the fully written derivation path in Appendix A, the direct grid comparison to self-consistent numerics, the multi-material benchmarking against both ab-initio Eliashberg solutions and experiment, and the independent consistency check via the zero-temperature coherence length of YH6.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix A (after Eq. A6); Fig. 1] Appendix A (after Eq. A6 and the variational statement): the single free scale λΔ is fixed at 0.7 by minimizing the discrepancy between the gap ansatz and the self-consistent numerical gap functions over precisely the window 0.1<λ0<3 that is later used for the MRE of Fig. 1. This introduces a mild but load-bearing circularity: the reported 6.557% agreement is not fully independent of the calibration set. The manuscript should either (i) fix λΔ by an independent criterion (e.g., half-width matching at a single reference λ0, or asymptotic matching), (ii) demonstrate that the MRE remains ≤10% when λΔ is varied by ±20% or when the ansatz is replaced by the Einstein-model form, or (iii) relegate the parameter to an explicit fitting constant and rephrase the claim from “analytical solution” to “accurate closed-form approximation.” Without such a test the absolute-accuracy claim for Eq. 21 rest
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A1) and Fig. A1] Eq. (A1) and Fig. A1: the algebraic kernel approximation λ(iωn-iωm)≈λ0/[1+2(ωn-ωm)^{2}] carries a pointwise relative error up to 10.4%. Because both the weak-coupling digamma reduction and the ultra-strong three-term truncation start from this replacement, the manuscript should quantify how the 10% kernel error propagates into the final Tc (e.g., by comparing the analytic formula against numerics that retain the exact logarithmic kernel of Eq. A1). At present it is unclear whether the quoted MRE already absorbs this error or whether a residual systematic bias remains in the strong-coupling regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] Figure 2 inset and Table 1: the dependence of λ0 on the electron-phonon broadening ηel-ph is shown for three q-meshes, yet the main-text discussion of YH6 Tc (Fig. 3) does not state which mesh and which final η value are adopted for the “analytical” and “self-consistent” curves. A single sentence clarifying the production settings would remove ambiguity.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (21)] Eq. (21) and the surrounding text: the interpolation weights are written with the Heaviside function Θ[4λ0-(3+7μ*)], but the physical motivation for the precise numerical prefactors 3 and 7 (originating from the three-term truncation) is not restated in the main text. A brief parenthetical reminder would help readers who skip the appendix.
  3. [Introduction / Conclusions] References [40] and [77] are cited for related analytic work and for the ultra-strong-coupling challenge; a short comparative sentence (one or two lines) on how the present Debye interpolation differs from those Einstein-based or bound-based approaches would strengthen the novelty claim.
  4. [Throughout] Minor typographical issues: “supercondu ctivity”, “incorporatin g”, “self-consistent determinati on”, and similar line-break artifacts appear throughout; a careful proof-reading pass is needed. Also, the Matsubara-frequency notation occasionally mixes ωn and ωn without the i, which can confuse readers.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Gap-ansatz scale λΔ=0.7 is variationally fixed to the same Debye-Eliashberg numerics later used for the 6.557% MRE validation of Eq. (21), introducing partial fitted-input circularity for the Debye accuracy claim.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Appendix A, paragraph after Eq. (A6) and the statement of λΔ; used in Eq. (21)/Fig. 1]
    "From a variational analysis of the half-width at half-maximum of (ωn)niΔ, or Ω(λ0), to minimize the difference between the numerical and analytical results over the range of 0.1 < λ0 < 3.0, we find λΔ ≈ 0.7."

    λΔ is the sole free scale of the gap ansatz that is substituted into the Eliashberg equations to obtain both the weak-coupling closed form (A13) and the ultra-strong form (A15). It is chosen by minimizing the discrepancy with the same class of self-consistent Debye solutions that later serve as the validation benchmark for the interpolated Tc formula (MRE 6.557% on a 28 imes20 grid that includes the fitted window). The absolute accuracy claim for the Debye model is therefore partly forced by construction; a different decay form or a different fixed λΔ would shift the predicted surface by more than the quoted error.

full rationale

The paper’s central analytical result (Eq. 21 / A16) is obtained by inserting a Lorentzian-like gap ansatz (A6) into the linearized Eliashberg equations, deriving closed weak- and ultra-strong-coupling expressions, and interpolating. The single free parameter of that ansatz is fixed by a variational minimization of the discrepancy between the ansatz and the self-consistent numerical gap functions over precisely the window 0.1 < λ0 < 3 that is later used for the MRE comparison of Tc (Fig. 1). Consequently the reported 6.557% agreement on the Debye grid is not fully independent of the fit. The asymptotic functional forms themselves follow from controlled approximations after the ansatz is inserted, and the subsequent applications to real hydrides (YH6 and the eight compounds of Fig. 4) employ external ab-initio spectral functions without refitting λΔ; those comparisons therefore remain non-circular. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is load-bearing. The circularity is therefore limited to the Debye-model accuracy claim and is only partial.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard isotropic Eliashberg framework plus three paper-specific modeling choices: the Debye form of α²F, a one-parameter gap ansatz whose scale is fitted to numerics, and an ad-hoc interpolation between asymptotic regimes. No new physical entities are postulated; the free parameters are the fitted λΔ and the conventional μ* values used in applications.

free parameters (2)
  • λ_Δ (gap-decay scale) = 0.7
    Fixed at 0.7 by variational minimization of the difference between analytic and numerical Tc over 0.1<λ0<3; controls the Matsubara decay of the gap ansatz and therefore enters both asymptotic formulas and the interpolation.
  • μ* (Morel-Anderson Coulomb pseudopotential) = 0.15–0.18
    Set by hand to 0.18 for YH6 and 0.15 for the multi-hydride comparisons; standard but still a free parameter that shifts the predicted Tc.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Isotropic Eliashberg equations on the imaginary axis with constant density of states N(0) and Migdal’s theorem for the self-energy.
    Invoked from the outset (Sec. II, Eqs. 9–14) as the starting point; standard for phonon-mediated superconductivity but excludes anisotropy and vertex corrections.
  • domain assumption Eliashberg spectral function takes the pure Debye form α²F(ω)=λ0 (ω/ωD)² Θ(ωD−ω).
    Eq. (15); used both for the analytic derivation and for extracting an effective ωD from ab-initio spectra via Eq. (17).
  • ad hoc to paper The superconducting gap admits the closed ansatz Δ(iωn)=Δ0/(1+ωn²/Ω²) with Ω²=λ0/λΔ.
    Introduced in Eq. (18)/ (A6) by analogy with the Einstein model; not derived from the Eliashberg equations themselves.
  • ad hoc to paper The electron-phonon kernel may be replaced by the algebraic approximation λ(iωn−iωm)≈λ0/[1+2(ωn−ωm)²].
    Eq. (A1); relative error up to 10 % (A2) but essential for obtaining closed digamma expressions.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 27885 in / 3043 out tokens · 28070 ms · 2026-07-15T00:59:08.709445+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent discovery of room-temperature superconductivity in hydrogen-rich materials under extreme pressures has renewed interest in phonon-mediated pairing mechanisms described by the Eliashberg theory, which generalizes the BCS framework by incorporating phonon retardation effects. In this article, we present an analytical solution to the isotropic Eliashberg equations for the superconducting critical temperature, formulated within the Debye model. This solution exhibits good agreement with fully selfconsistent numerical calculations across both weak- and strong-coupling regimes, correctly reproducing the exponential and square-root dependences on the electron-phonon coupling parameter. We further apply the solution to YH6, benchmarking against experiment and the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula. More broadly, across a diverse set of hydride superconductors, the predicted critical temperature shows scaling consistency with ab initio calculations and experimental data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.12213 by Chumin Wang, Tomas J. Escamilla.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predicted critical temperature Tc as a function of the electron-phonon coupling constant 0 , obtained from Eq. (21) with  0.15   (red circles). The shaded region is bounded by  0   (upper border) and  0.35   (lower border). Green triangles: ab initio data from Refs. [40-42]. Blue squares: experimental Tc from Ref. [42] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: , all the eleven experimental Tc values (blue squares) are taken from Ref. [48], and for eight of them, the corresponding 0 values were obtained from reported ab-initio calculations performed at pressures close to the experimental conditions [49-56]. The light-magenta shaded region in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Kamerlingh Onnes, The resistance of pure mercury at helium temperatures, Proc

    H. Kamerlingh Onnes, The resistance of pure mercury at helium temperatures, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 13 , 1274-1276 (1911)

    1911

  2. [2]

    C. P. Poole, H. A. Farach, R. J. Creswick, and R. Prozorov, Superconductivity (Elsevier, Amsterdam,

  3. [3]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Phys. B 64 , 189-193 (1986)

    1986

  4. [4]

    M. K. Wu, J. R. Ashburn, C. J. Torng, P. H. Hor, R. L. Meng, L. Gao, Z. J. Huang, Y. Q. Wang, and C. W. Chu, Superconductivity at 93K in a new mixed-pha se Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 , 908-910 (1987)

    1987

  5. [5]

    A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity at 203 Kelvin at high pressures i n the sulfur hydride system, Nature 525 , 75-76 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Einaga, M

    M. Einaga, M. Sakata, T. Ishikawa, K. Shimizu, M. I. Eremets, A. P. Drozdov, I. A. Troyan, N. Hirao, and Y. Ohishi, Crystal structure of the superconduc ting phase of sulfur hydride, Nat. Phys. 12 , 835- 838 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    F. Peng, Y. Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y. Ma, Hydrogen clathrate structures in ra re earth hydrides at high pressure: possible route to room-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 , 107001 (6pp) (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Somayazulu, M

    M. Somayazulu, M. Ahart, A. K. Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y. Meng, V. V. Struzhkin, and R. J. Hemley, Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 , 027001 (6pp) (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    D. V. Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. G. Ivanova, V . Svitlyk, V. Yu. Fominski, A. V. Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V. M. Pudalov, I. A. Troyan, and A. R. Oganov, Superconductivity at 161 K in thorium hydride ThH 10 : Synthesis and properties, Mater. Today 33 , 36-44 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    P. Kong, V. S. Minkov, M. A. Kuzovnikov, A. P. Drozdov, S. P. Besedin, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, V. B. Prakapenka, S. Chariton, D. A. Knyazev, E. Greenberg, and M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity up to 243 K in the yttrium-hydrogen system under high pressure, Nat. Commun . 12 , 5075 (9pp) (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    I. A. Troyan, D. V. Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. V. Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V. M. Pudalov, A. G. Ivanova, V. B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, A. G. G avriliuk, I. S. Lyubutin, V. V. Struzhkin, A. Bergara, I. Errea, R. Bianco, M. Calandra, F. Mauri , L. Monacelli, R. Akashi, and A. R. Oganov, Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH 6 and YH 9 und...

    2021

  12. [12]

    L. Ma, K. Wang, Y. Xie, X. Yang, Y. Wang, M. Zhou, H. Liu, X. Yu, Y. Zhao, H. Wang, G. Liu, and Y. Ma, High-temperature superconducting phase in cl athrate calcium hydride CaH 6 up to 215 K at a pressure of 172 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 , 167001 (6pp) (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Metallic hydrogen a high-tempe rature superconductor?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 , 1748- 1749 (1968)

    1968

  14. [14]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High-temperature superconductors?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 187002 (2004). 20

    2004

  15. [15]

    M. K.-H. Kiessling, B. L. Altshuler, and E. A. Yuzbashyan, Bounds on Tc in the Eliashberg theory of superconductivity. I: The γ-Model, J. Stat. Phys. 192 , 69 (35pp) (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Phys. Rev. 167 , 332-344 (1968)

    1968

  17. [17]

    P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition temper ature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Phys. Rev. B 12 (3), 905-922 (1975)

    1975

  18. [18]

    D. Duan, Y. Liu, F. Tian, D. Li1, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Pressure - induced metallization of dense (H 2S) 2H2 with high-Tc superconductivity, Sci. Rep. 4, 6968 (6pp) (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Cappelluti and G

    E. Cappelluti and G. A. Ummarino, Strong-coupl ing properties of unbalanced Eliashberg superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 76 , 104522 (9pp) (2007)

    2007

  20. [20]

    Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory in the weak-coupling limit, Phys

    F. Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory in the weak-coupling limit, Phys. Rev. B 98 , 024523 (8pp) (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Mirabi, R

    S. Mirabi, R. Boyack, and F. Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory in the weak-coupling limit: Results on the real frequency axis, Phys. Rev. B 101 , 064506 (9pp) (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Schrodi, A

    F. Schrodi, A. Aperis, and P. M. Oppeneer, Ind uced odd-frequency superconducting state in vertex- corrected Eliashberg theory, Phys. Rev. B 104 , 174518 (9pp) (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    S. R. Xie, Y. Quan, A. C. Hire, B. Deng, J. M. DeStefano, I. Salinas, U. S. Shah, L. Fanfarillo, J. Lim, J. Kim, G. R. Stewart, J. J. Hamlin, P. J. Hirschfe ld, and R. G. Hennig, Machine learning of superconducting critical temperature from Eliashberg theory, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 14 (8pp) (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Zhang, Z

    S.-S. Zhang, Z. M. Raines, and A. V. Chubukov, Applicability of Eliashberg theory for systems with electron-phonon and electron-electron interaction: A comparative analysis, Phys. Rev. B 109 , 245132 (16pp) (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Pinsook, N

    U. Pinsook, N. Natkunlaphat, K. Rientong, P. T asee, and J. Seeyangnok, Analytic solutions of Eliashberg gap equations at superconducting critical temperature, Phys. Scr. 99 , 065211 (15pp) (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between electro ns and lattice vibrations in a superconductor, Soviet Phys. JEPT 11 (3), 696-702 (1960)

    1960

  27. [27]

    Nambu, Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity, Phys

    Y. Nambu, Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 117 , 648-663 (1960)

    1960

  28. [28]

    E. N. Economou, Green’s functions in quantum physics , 3rd edition (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006) p. 112

    2006

  29. [29]

    Heid, in The physics of correlated insulators, metals, and superconductors , edited by E

    R. Heid, in The physics of correlated insulators, metals, and superconductors , edited by E. Pavarini, E. Koch, R. Scalettar, and R. Martin (Verlag, Jülich, 2017), chapter 15

    2017

  30. [30]

    A. B. Migdal, Interaction between electrons and lattice vibrations in a normal metal, Soviet Phys. JETP 34 , 996-1001 (1958)

    1958

  31. [31]

    E. R. Margine and F. Giustino, Anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory using Wannier functions, Phys. Rev. B 87 , 024505 (12pp) (2013)

    2013

  32. [32]

    G. A. C. Ummarino, in Emergent phenomena in correlated matter , edited by E. Pavarini, E. Koch, and U. Schollwöck (Verlag, Jülich, 2013), chapter 13

    2013

  33. [33]

    N. W. Ashcroft y N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (W. B. Saunders Co., 1976) p. 458. 21

    1976

  34. [34]

    P. B. Allen and R. Silberglitt, Some effects o f phonon dynamics on electron lifetime, mass renormalization, and superconducting transition temperature, Phys. Rev. B 9 (11), 4733-4741 (1974)

    1974

  35. [35]

    Nojima, K

    A. Nojima, K. Yamashita, and B. Hellsing, Model Eliashberg functions for surface states, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 , 7938-7941 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    High-temperature supercon ductivity in alkaline and rare earth polyhydrides a t high pressure: A theoretical perspective,

    E. Zurek and T. Bi, “High-temperature supercon ductivity in alkaline and rare earth polyhydrides a t high pressure: A theoretical perspective,” J. Chem. Phys . 150 , 050901 (13pp) (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo , A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio Jr., A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi , G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino , T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj,...

    2017

  38. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Gene ralized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 , 3865-3868 (1996)

    1996

  39. [39]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50 , 17953-17979 (1994)

    1994

  40. [40]

    Natkunlaphat, P

    N. Natkunlaphat, P. Tasee, and U. Pinsook, Analytical emergence of the logarithmic average phonon frequency in the superconducting critical temperature formula, Phys. Scr. 100 , 115913 (14pp) (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    P. Song, A. P. Durajski, Z. Hou, A. Ghaffar, R . Dahule, R. Szcz ȩś niak, K. Hongo, and R. Maezono, (La,Th)H ₁₀: Potential high-Tc (242 K) superconductors stabilized thermodynamically below 200 GPa, J. Phys. Chem. C 128 , 2656-2665 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Jiang, D

    Q. Jiang, D. Duan, H. Song, Z. Zhang, Z. Huo, S. Jiang, T. Cui, and Y. Yao, Prediction of room- temperature superconductivity in quasi-atomic H 2-type hydrides at high pressure, Adv. Sci. 11 , 2405561 (8pp) (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Shi, Y.-K

    L.-T. Shi, Y.-K. Wei, A.-K. Liang, R. Turnbull , C. Cheng, X.-R. Chen, and G.-F. Ji, Prediction of pressure-induced superconductivity in the novel ternary system ScCaH 2n (n = 1-6), J. Mater. Chem. C 9, 7284-7291 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    D. V. Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. G. Ivanova, V. Svitlyk, V. Yu. Fominski, A. V. Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V. M. Pudalov, I. A. Troyan, and A. R. Oganov, Superconductivity at 161 K in thorium hydride ThH ₁₀: Synthesis and properties, Mater. Today 33 , 36-44 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    J. Gao, W. Zeng, Z.-T. Liu, and Q.-J. Liu, Superconductivity at 215 K in H 3SM (M = Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn) ternary hydrides, J. Alloys Compd. 983 , 173911 (8pp) (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Y. Quan, S. S. Ghosh, and W. E. Pickett, Compressed hydrides as metallic hydrogen superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 100 , 184505 (10pp) (2019)

    2019

  47. [47]

    A. M. Shipley, M. J. Hutcheon, R. J. Needs, an d C. J. Pickard, High-throughput discovery of high- temperature conventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 104 , 054501 (13pp) (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    S. I. Bondarenko, V. P. Timofeev, V. P. Koverya, and A. V. Krevsun, Hydrogen in superconductors, Low Temp. Phys. 50 , 597-652 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Y. Yao, J. S. Tse, Y. Ma, and K. Tanaka, Superconductivity in high-pressure SiH 4, Europhys. Lett. 78 , 37003 (6pp) (2007). 22

    2007

  50. [50]

    H. Wang, J. S. Tse, K. Tanaka, T. Iitaka, and Y. Ma, Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 , 6463-6466 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    Akashi, M

    R. Akashi, M. Kawamura, S. Tsuneyuki, Y. Nomur a, and R. Arita, First-principles study of the pressure and crystal-structure dependences of the s uperconducting transition temperature in compressed sulfur hydrides, Phys. Rev. B 91 , 224513 (7pp) (2015)

    2015

  52. [52]

    Y. Ma, D. Duan, D. Li, Y. Liu, F. Tian, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, and T. Cui, The unexpected binding and superconductivity in SbH 4 at high pressure, arXiv:1506.03889v2 (2015)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Abe, High-pressure properties of dense meta llic zirconium hydrides studied by ab initio calculations, Phys

    K. Abe, High-pressure properties of dense meta llic zirconium hydrides studied by ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B 98 , 134103 (7pp) (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    D. V. Semenok, I. A. Kruglov, I. A. Savkin, A. G. Kvashnin, and A. R. Oganov, On distribution of superconductivity in metal hydrides, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 24 , 100808 (8pp) (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    Kostrzewa, K

    M. Kostrzewa, K. M. Szcz ęś niak, A. P. Durajski, and R. Szcz ęś niak, From LaH ₁₀ to room-temperature superconductors, Sci. Rep. 10 , 1592 (8pp) (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    H. Cui, M. Li, F. Zheng, and P. Zhang, Superconductivity in Th-H and Pu-H compounds under high- pressure conditions: A first-principles study, Phys. Status Solidi B 260 , 2200452 (9pp) (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    J. P. Carbotte, Properties of boson-exchange superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62 , 1027-1150 (1990)

    1990

  58. [58]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , 2nd Ed

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , 2nd Ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996) p. 118

    1996

  59. [59]

    Villa-Cortés, O

    S. Villa-Cortés, O. de la Peña-Seaman, K. V. L awler, and A. Salamat, Isotope effect and critical magnetic fields of superconducting YH ₆: A Migdal-Eliashberg theory approach, Phys. Rev. B 108 , L020506 (7pp) (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    P. Kong, V. S. Minkov, M. A. Kuzovnikov, A. P. Drozdov, S. P. Besedin, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, V. B. Prakapenka, S. Chariton, D. A. Knyazev, E. Greenberg, and M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity up to 243 K in the yttrium-hydrogen system under high pressure, Nat. Commun. 12 , 5075 (9pp) (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    Baggioli and A

    M. Baggioli and A. Zaccone, Universal origin of Boson peak vibrational anomalies in ordered crystals and in amorphous materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 , 145501 (6pp) (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    Baggioli, C

    M. Baggioli, C. Setty, and A. Zaccone, Effecti ve theory of superconductivity in strongly coupled amorphous materials, Phys. Rev. B 101 , 214502 (8pp) (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    Setty, M

    C. Setty, M. Baggioli, and A. Zaccone, Anharmo nic phonon damping enhances the Tc of BCS-type superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 102 , 174506 (7pp) (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    Jiang, E

    C. Jiang, E. Beneduce, M. Baggioli, C. Setty, and A. Zaccone, Possible enhancement of the superconducting Tc due to sharp Kohn-like soft phon on anomalies, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35 , 164003 (13pp) (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    Jiang, G

    C. Jiang, G. A. Ummarino, M. Baggioli, E. Liar okapis, and A. Zaccone, Correlation between optical phonon softening and superconducting Tc in YBa 2Cu 3Ox within d-wave Eliashberg theory, J. Phys. Mater. 7, 045002 (12pp) (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Setty, M

    C. Setty, M. Baggioli, and A. Zaccone, Anharmo nic theory of superconductivity and its applications to emerging quantum materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36 , 173002 (26pp) (2024). 23

    2024

  67. [67]

    Sanna, C

    A. Sanna, C. Pellegrini, and E. K. U. Gross, C ombining Eliashberg theory with density functional theory for the accurate prediction of superconducting transition temperatures and gap functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 , 057001 (6pp) (2020)

    2020

  68. [68]

    Lucrezi, P

    R. Lucrezi, P. P. Ferreira, S. Hajinazar, H. M ori, H. Paudyal, E. R. Margine, and C. Heil, Full- bandwidth anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory and its application to superhydrides, Commun. Phys . 7, 33 (13pp) (2024)

    2024

  69. [69]

    K. R. Babu and G.-Y. Guo, Electron-phonon coup ling, superconductivity, and nontrivial band topology in NbN polytypes, Phys. Rev. B 99 , 104508 (12pp) (2019)

    2019

  70. [70]

    Zhang, X

    J. Zhang, X. Zhang, B. He, and L. Xu, Supercon ductivity in the kagomelike MgP 2H3 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 113 , 094525 (7pp) (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    C. G. Galván, L. A. Pérez, and C. Wang, A Bogo liubov-de Gennes study of d-wave Hubbard superconductors under magnetic field, Physica B: Condensed Matter 553 , 36-39 (2019)

    2019

  72. [72]

    G. E. López and C. Wang, Superconductivity in correlated carbon nanotubes under pressure: A Bogoliubov-de Gennes study, Physica B: Condensed Matter 675 , 415602 (9pp) (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    X. Wang, T. Bi, K. P. Hileke, A. Lamichhane, R. J. Hemley and E. Zurek, Dilute carbon in H 3S under pressure, npj Comput. Mater . 8, 87 (9pp) (2022)

    2022

  74. [74]

    F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, 2010) p. 140

    2010

  75. [75]

    Combescot, Critical temperature of superconductors: The spectral dependence, Europhys

    R. Combescot, Critical temperature of superconductors: The spectral dependence, Europhys. Lett. 10 (2), 177-182 (1989)

    1989

  76. [76]

    T. J. Escamilla and C. Wang, Self-consistent s olution of Eliashberg equations for metal hydride superconductors, IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1345 , 012023 (8pp) (2026)

    2026

  77. [77]

    M. K.-H. Kiessling, B. L. Altshuler, and E. A. Yuzbashyan, Bounds on Tc in the Eliashberg Theory of Superconductivity. III: Einstein Phonons, J. Stat. Phys. 192 , 93 (26pp) (2025)

    2025