Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 55 references

In Fe2Mo3O8, flipping ferroelectric polarization reverses both altermagnetic spin splitting and shift-current sign, while a-axis strain turns on a Kerr effect that symmetry forbids in the pristine crystal.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 03:14 UTC pith:CZKZWE7E

load-bearing objection Solid DFT map of polarization-reversed g-wave spin texture + shift-current sign flip in Fe2Mo3O8, with strain-tuned spectra and a-axis MOKE activation; residual Kerr under “symmetry-preserving” strains is a real but secondary control issue, not a load-bearing collapse. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.12799 v1 pith:CZKZWE7E submitted 2026-07-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Strain-Tunable Shift Current and Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in Multiferroic Altermagnet Fe2Mo3O8

Shengqiao Wang , Bo Zhao , Harish K. Singh , Jiahao Xie , Fu Li , Hongbin Zhang , Yang Su , Chen Shen
show 1 more author
Lijun Zhang
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismFe2Mo3O8shift currentmagneto-optical Kerr effectferroelectric polarizationstrain engineeringmultiferroicsspin splitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses first-principles calculations to show that the polar multiferroic Fe2Mo3O8 is a platform where ferroelectric polarization, altermagnetic spin texture, and optical responses are tightly linked. Switching the polarization along the polar axis swaps the spin-up and spin-down channels in momentum space, reversing a g-wave spin-splitting pattern, and simultaneously flips the sign of the dominant shift-current component while leaving net magnetization zero. Different strain modes then retune these responses: biaxial and shape-preserving strains can more than double the peak shift current and move it to higher photon energies by opening more interband channels, whereas a-axis uniaxial strain lowers the magnetic point group enough to activate a finite polar magneto-optical Kerr effect that is symmetry-forbidden in the pristine phase. A sympathetic reader cares because the work maps concrete electrical and mechanical knobs onto spin-dependent photocurrent and magneto-optics in a compensated magnet, suggesting routes to control readout without stray fields.

Core claim

In altermagnetic Fe2Mo3O8, ferroelectric polarization reversal comprehensively reconstructs the nonrelativistic spin-splitting texture and inverts the sign of the shift current, while a-axis uniaxial strain lowers crystalline symmetry and activates a finite magneto-optical Kerr effect that is forbidden by the pristine magnetic point group.

What carries the argument

The g-wave altermagnetic spin-splitting texture of compensated Fe moments (opposite-spin sublattices linked by rotation/mirror operations rather than inversion or pure translation) and the symmetry-allowed optical tensors (shift-current σzyy and the off-diagonal dielectric εxy that controls polar MOKE).

Load-bearing premise

The predicted sign flips, spectral peaks, and strain-activated Kerr signal rest on DFT+U bands and independent-particle optical tensors for the assumed altermagnetic ground state; if correlations, excitons, or a different magnetic order change those bands or allowed tensors, the responses can shift or vanish.

What would settle it

Measure the shift-current spectrum (especially σzyy) and polar Kerr rotation on Fe2Mo3O8 while electrically reversing polarization and applying controlled a-axis uniaxial strain; absence of sign reversal or of Kerr activation under the reported strain would falsify the central coupling claims.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Electrical polarization switching can reverse both the k-space spin texture and the polarity of second-order photocurrent without net magnetization.
  • Biaxial or isotropic strain can substantially enhance and spectrally reshape the shift current by increasing joint density of states and redistributing k-space contributions.
  • A-axis uniaxial strain is a practical symmetry-breaking handle that turns on polar MOKE (Kerr rotation of order a few degrees at +5% strain) while preserving altermagnetism.
  • Fe2Mo3O8 becomes a concrete materials platform for devices that couple ferroelectric control, nonlinear photocurrent, and strain-tunable magneto-optics in a compensated magnet.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the polarization-switch pathway remains accessible under the same strains that activate MOKE, a single device geometry could electrically reverse photocurrent polarity and mechanically gate Kerr readout.
  • Similar polarization–spin-texture locking may appear in other A2Mo3O8 polar magnets, making the family a broader search space for electrically switchable altermagnetic optics.
  • The reported residual Kerr signals under nominally symmetry-preserving strains warn that relaxation-induced symmetry lowering must be controlled experimentally before claiming pure strain-mode activation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This first-principles DFT+U study examines polar multiferroic altermagnet Fe2Mo3O8 (space group P63mc). It reports a g-wave nonrelativistic spin-splitting texture that is reversed, together with the sign of the dominant shift-current component σzyy, upon ferroelectric polarization switching that interchanges tetrahedral and octahedral Fe sites while preserving compensated net magnetization. Strain screening shows that ab biaxial and abc shape-preserving strains enhance and spectrally reshape σzyy (peaks up to ~44 and ~52 μA/V²), correlated with JDOS and k-resolved redistributions, while a-axis uniaxial strain is argued to lower the magnetic point group from 6′mm′ to 2′, thereby activating a finite polar MOKE (Kerr rotation up to ~3.13° at +5%) that is symmetry-forbidden (εxy = 0) in the pristine phase.

Significance. If the predicted couplings hold, the work supplies a concrete multiferroic altermagnet platform in which electrical polarization, nonrelativistic spin texture, second-order photocurrent, and strain-activated magneto-optics can be jointly controlled—relevant to electrically readable altermagnetic spintronics and nonlinear optoelectronics. Strengths include explicit magnetic-point-group analysis of εxy, Wannier-interpolated shift-current spectra with JDOS and k-resolved maps, and a systematic strain survey that separates magnitude tuning from symmetry activation. The results are forward DFT predictions rather than parameter fits to the target observables, and they connect polarization switching, altermagnetic texture, and optical tensors in a single material.

major comments (2)
  1. Table 1 and the MOKE discussion (Results, Fig. 4 and surrounding text): the central claim that a-axis uniaxial strain uniquely activates finite polar MOKE by lowering MPG 6′mm′ → 2′ is undercut by residual θK Max = −0.85° already under +2% abc strain, which is introduced as a symmetry-preserving mode yet is reported with MPG 2′ after fully relativistic relaxation. The authors attribute residuals to SOC/relaxation artifacts and exclude them as non-robust channels, but the same relaxation protocol is used for the a-axis series that supplies the headline 3.13°. Without a controlled comparison that freezes ions to the intended high-symmetry cell (or quantifies εxy before vs after free relaxation for both modes), the numerical distinction between deliberate a-axis activation and uncontrolled symmetry lowering remains incomplete and load-bearing for the MOKE claim.
  2. Computational Methods and Results (ALM reference, Ueff = 4 eV, independent-particle shift current and dielectric tensors): all quantitative claims—sign reversal of σzyy, peak magnitudes ~23–52 μA/V², and Kerr angles up to ~3°—rest on a single DFT+U functional and the independent-particle approximation, with ALM taken as ground state from prior total-energy ranking. Band-edge positions, JDOS, and allowed tensor components can shift under different U, hybrid functionals, or excitonic corrections. At minimum, a short sensitivity check (e.g., Ueff variation or a hybrid single-point on key strained cells) is needed to establish that the qualitative polarization reversal and strain-activated MOKE survive beyond the chosen setup.
minor comments (5)
  1. Introduction and Results: several statements of prior work (polarization pathway, ALM vs FM/CFIM ranking) rely heavily on Ref. [32]; a brief self-contained summary of the energy ordering and switching barrier would help readers who do not have that paper at hand.
  2. Fig. 2(c) and Fig. 3(d–f): color scales and units for spin-splitting maps and k-resolved σzyy are not fully specified in the captions; adding them would improve reproducibility of the visual claims.
  3. Table 1: θK Max for pristine is left blank while residual values appear for abc; a consistent convention (0 or “—” with a footnote) would avoid ambiguity.
  4. Methods: the polar MOKE formula is standard, but the text should state explicitly whether local-field or scissors corrections are omitted, so that the independent-particle limitation is transparent.
  5. Typographical: “V ASP” spacing, “Ernerhof”, and occasional double spaces appear in the Methods and figure captions; a light copy-edit pass is warranted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: shift-current sign reversal, spin-texture reconstruction, and strain-activated MOKE are forward DFT+U/Wannier predictions, not forced by fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing results are independent-particle evaluations of the shift-current tensor (Sipe–Shkrebtii via Wannier90) and the dielectric tensor (for polar Kerr rotation) on DFT+U (Ueff = 4 eV) band structures of Fe2Mo3O8 under polarization reversal and three strain modes. These are ordinary first-principles outputs; no free parameter is fitted to the target spectra or Kerr angles and then re-presented as a prediction. The choice of the altermagnetic reference state and the polarization-switching pathway are taken from an external prior calculation (Gao et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025) whose author list does not overlap with the present work; that citation supplies a structural starting point, not a uniqueness theorem that forces the subsequent optical tensors. Overlapping-author citations (e.g., the medium-throughput optics framework) supply only methodological context and do not enter the numerical evaluation of σzyy or θK for this compound. Residual Kerr signals under nominally symmetry-preserving strains are acknowledged by the authors as relaxation artifacts and are explicitly excluded from the “activation” claim; that is a numerical-control issue, not a definitional circularity. Consequently the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard condensed-matter computational practice (GGA+U, Wannier optics, magnetic point-group selection rules) plus a few material-specific choices (Ueff, ALM ground state, independent-particle optics, imposed strain modes). No new particles or forces are introduced; free parameters are the usual DFT knobs that set absolute scales of gaps and optical peaks.

free parameters (3)
  • Ueff on Fe d orbitals = 4 eV
    Fixed at 4 eV following prior Fe2Mo3O8 work; controls correlation, gap, and thus optical onset and peak heights of shift current and MOKE.
  • Strain amplitude range and selected ratios = −5% to +5%; highlights +5% a, +4% ab, +2% abc
    Theoretical strains from −5% to +5%; representative +5% a, +4% ab, +2% abc chosen as extremes that maximize responses—selection affects reported peak values.
  • k-mesh and energy cutoff choices = 500 eV; 5×5×3, 10×10×6, 100×100×100
    500 eV cutoff; 5×5×3 / 10×10×6 / 100×100×100 meshes for relaxation, SCF/optics, and shift current—numerical parameters that can shift peak magnitudes.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE + Dudarev DFT+U adequately describes Fe2Mo3O8 electronic structure and magnetic order for optical tensor trends.
    Invoked throughout Computational Methods and Results; no hybrid or GW benchmark for the optical spectra.
  • domain assumption Independent-particle approximation (Sipe–Shkrebtii) captures the dominant shift-current and dielectric response without excitonic or local-field corrections.
    Stated in Computational Methods for shift current and MOKE derivation from the dielectric tensor.
  • domain assumption The altermagnetic configuration is the relevant magnetic ground state (energetically favored over FM and CFIM in the pristine structure).
    Taken from prior calculation [32] and used as the magnetic reference for all subsequent spectra.
  • standard math Magnetic point-group operations (e.g., 2′001) force εxy → −εxy hence εxy = 0 in 6′mm′, and lowering to 2′ allows finite MOKE.
    Standard Neumann-principle / magnetic-symmetry argument in the MOKE Results section.
  • domain assumption Weak type-I multiferroic coupling preserves local Fe moment directions under polarization switching, so only spin channels interchange.
    Used to interpret polarization-up/down band and spin-splitting reversal in Figure 2 discussion.
  • domain assumption Maximally localized Wannier functions from the DFT bands faithfully interpolate interband matrix elements for dense-mesh shift-current integration.
    Wannier90 workflow in Computational Methods.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 15830 in / 3695 out tokens · 34099 ms · 2026-07-15T03:14:49.006938+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Altermagnetism has recently emerged as a compelling frontier in spintronics, seamlessly merging the agile tunability of ferromagnets with the hallmark merits of antiferromagnets. As a prototypical polar multiferroic featuring distinctive altermagnetism, Fe2Mo3O8 hosts an ideal playground for exploring the intricate interplay among ferroelectric polarization, altermagnetic order, and spin-dependent responses. Here, employing first-principles calculations, we systematically investigate the coupling among polarization, spin splitting, shift current, and magneto-optical responses in Fe2Mo3O8. Our findings reveal that switching the ferroelectric polarization not only inverts the sign of the shift current but also comprehensively reshapes the momentum-space spin-splitting texture. Furthermore, the shift current and magneto-optical spectrum exhibits strong tunability under mechanical strain. Remarkably, the application of a-axis uniaxial strain breaks the crystalline symmetry, thereby activating a finite magneto-optical Kerr effect that is otherwise forbidden in the pristine phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.12799 by Bo Zhao, Chen Shen, Fu Li, Harish K. Singh, Hongbin Zhang, Jiahao Xie, Lijun Zhang, Shengqiao Wang, Yang Su.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Crystal structure, compensated magnetic order, and altermagnetic electronic structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Strain engineering of shift current and k-resolved contributions in Fe2Mo3O8. (a) Schematic illustration of the two representative strain modes used to enhance the shift current response: in-plane ab biaxial strain (denoted as ab strain) and shape-preserving strain applied simultaneously along the a, b, c directions (denoted as abc strain). (b) Calculated σzyy shift current spectra for pristine Fe2Mo3O8, +… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Symmetry-breaking activation of MOKE by a-axis uniaxial strain in Fe2Mo3O8. (a) Schematic illustration of the symmetry change induced by a-axis uniaxial strain. In the pristine structure, the relevant mirror-related constraints suppress the off-diagonal optical response, leading to a negligibly small MOKE signal. Applying a-axis uniaxial strain explicitly removes these constraints and enables a finite pola… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Krempaský et al., Altermagnetic Lifting of Kramers Spin Degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    J. Krempaský et al., Altermagnetic Lifting of Kramers Spin Degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat Rev Mater 10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    X. Chen, Y . Liu, P. Liu, Y . Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional Magnons in Collinear Magnets Dictated by Spin Space Groups, Nature 640, 349 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    L.-D. Yuan, A. B. Georgescu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonrelativistic Spin Splitting at the Brillouin Zone Center in Compensated Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216701 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    L.-D. Yuan, X. Zhang, C. M. Acosta, and A. Zunger, Uncovering Spin-Orbit Coupling- Independent Hidden Spin Polarization of Energy Bands in Antiferromagnets, Nat Commun 14, 5301 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Altermagnetism: A Chemical Perspective, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 2257 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Feng et al., An Anomalous Hall Effect in Altermagnetic Ruthenium Dioxide, Nat Electron 5, 735 (2022)

    Z. Feng et al., An Anomalous Hall Effect in Altermagnetic Ruthenium Dioxide, Nat Electron 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt et al., Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from an Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Phase in a Semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antiferromagnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Hoyer, R

    R. Hoyer, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K.-H. Ahn, L. Šmejkal, and A. Mook, Spontaneous Crystal Thermal Hall Effect in Insulating Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020412 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Iguchi, H

    S. Iguchi, H. Kobayashi, Y . Ikemoto, T. Furukawa, H. Itoh, S. Iwai, T. Moriwaki, and T. Sasaki, Magneto-Optical Spectra of an Organic Antiferromagnet as a Candidate for an Altermagnet, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033026 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Jiang, U

    X. Jiang, U. Jeong, S. Sato, D. Shin, K. Yabana, B. Yan, and N. Park, Nonlinear Photocurrent as a Hallmark of Altermagnet, ACS Nano 19, 23620 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    F. Li, B. Zhao, V . Chaudhary, S. Wang, C. Shen, H. Wang, and H. Zhang, Medium- Throughput Evaluation of Transport and Optical Responses in Altermagnets, arXiv:2604.17071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    L. Wei, F. Li, Y . Liu, H. Zhang, J. Luo, and Z. Sun, Shift current anomalous photovoltaics in a double perovskite ferroelectric, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123, e2518381123 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Huang, C

    Y . Huang, C. Hua, R. Xu, J. Liu, Y . Zheng, and Y . Lu, Spin Inversion Enforced by Crystal Symmetry in Ferroelastic Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 266701 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    J. D. Cao, K. S. Denisov, Y . Liu, and I. Žutić, Symmetry Classification for Alternating Excitons in Two-Dimensional Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 266703 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Yan and M

    Y . Yan and M. Wu, Ionic Sliding Ferroelectricity in Layered Ion Conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 236801 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    X. Yang, X. Zhou, J. Shi, S. Qian, X. Wang, W. Wang, and Y . Li, Magnetic-Field and Strain Engineering of Modulated Transverse Transport in Altermagnetic Topological Materials, Phys. Rev. B 112, 214418 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Li, A.-D

    J.-Y . Li, A.-D. Fan, Y .-K. Wang, Y . Zhang, and S. Li, Strain-induced valley polarization, topological states, and piezomagnetism in two-dimensional altermagnetic V2Te2O, V2STeO, V2SSeO, and V2S2O, Applied Physics Letters 125, 222404 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Liang, F

    T. Liang, F. Kong, J. Zhao, and X. Jiang, Strain-dependent nonlinear variation of the anomalous Hall effect in RuO2, Phys. Rev. B 112, 224318 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Karetta, X

    B. Karetta, X. H. Verbeek, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Strain- controlled g - to d -wave transition in altermagnetic CrSb, Phys. Rev. B 112, 094454 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Fan, Y .-K

    A.-D. Fan, Y .-K. Wang, J.-Y . Li, and S. Li, Valley-dependent electronic properties in two-dimensional altermagnetic iron-based transition metal chalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 112, 235135 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Y . Wang, G. L. Pascut, B. Gao, T. A. Tyson, K. Haule, V . Kiryukhin, and S.-W. Cheong, Unveiling hidden ferrimagnetism and giant magnetoelectricity in polar magnet Fe2Mo3O8, Sci Rep 5, 12268 (2015)

    2015

  29. [29]

    Li et al., Oxygen-Self-Supply Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Fe2Mo3O8 Semiconductor Single Crystal With Colossal Ferroelectric Polarization, Advanced Materials, e18468 (n.d.)

    X. Li et al., Oxygen-Self-Supply Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Fe2Mo3O8 Semiconductor Single Crystal With Colossal Ferroelectric Polarization, Advanced Materials, e18468 (n.d.)

  30. [30]

    J. Dong, K. Wu, M. Zhu, F. Zheng, X. Li, and J. Zhang, Nonrelativistic spin-splitting multiferroic antiferromagnets and compensated ferrimagnet with zero net magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 112, 024425 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    K. V . Vasin, Optical magnetoelectric effect in the polar honeycomb antiferromagnet Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 110, (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Y . Gao, S. Li, and M. Wu, Ferroelectric control of antiferromagnetism via coordination swapping in A2Mo3O8 (Aௗ=ௗMn, Fe, Co), Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 252901 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  34. [34]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal– amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994)

    1994

  35. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  36. [36]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  37. [37]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  38. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  39. [39]

    Reschke, A

    S. Reschke, A. A. Tsirlin, N. Khan, L. Prodan, V . Tsurkan, I. Kézsmárki, and J. Deisenhofer, Structure, phonons, and orbital degrees of freedom in Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094307 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    Pizzi et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J

    G. Pizzi et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Ibañez-Azpiroz, S

    J. Ibañez-Azpiroz, S. S. Tsirkin, and I. Souza, Ab initio calculation of the shift photocurrent by Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245143 (2018)

    2018

  42. [42]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical response in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5337 (2000)

    2000

  43. [43]

    Molina-Sánchez, G

    A. Molina-Sánchez, G. Catarina, D. Sangalli, and J. Fernández-Rossier, Magneto- optical response of chromium trihalide monolayers: chemical trends, J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 8856 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    M. Wu, Z. Li, S. Louie. Optical and Magneto-Optical Properties of Ferromagnetic Monolayer: A First-Principles and plus Bethe-Salpeter Equation Study, PhysRevMaterials.6.014008

  45. [45]

    M. Wu, Z. Li, T. Cao, and S. G. Louie, Physical origin of giant excitonic and magneto- optical responses in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insulators, Nat Commun 10, 2371 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Ideue, T

    T. Ideue, T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y . Tokura, Giant thermal Hall effect in multiferroics, Nature Mater 16, 797 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    Chang, Y

    Y . Chang, Y . Weng, Y . Xie, B. You, J. Wang, L. Li, J.-M. Liu, S. Dong, and C. Lu, Colossal Linear Magnetoelectricity in Polar Magnet Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136701 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Kurumaji, S

    T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y . Tokura. Doping-Tunable Ferrimagnetic Phase with Large Linear Magnetoelectric Effect in a Polar Magnet, PhysRevX.5.031034

  49. [49]

    M. Gu, Y . Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y . Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric Switchable Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Y . Chen, X. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Electrical Switching of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016701 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    J. Wang, J. B. Neaton, H. Zheng, V . Nagarajan, S. B. Ogale, B. Liu, D. Viehland, V . V aithyanathan, D. G. Schlom, and R. Ramesh. Epitaxial BiFeO3 Multiferroic Thin Film Heterostructures. Science 299, 1719 (2003)

    2003

  52. [52]

    B. B. Van Aken, T. T. M. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. A. Spaldin, The origin of ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric YMnO3, Nature Mater 3, 164 (2004)

    2004

  53. [53]

    N. T. Kaner et al., Enhanced Shift Currents in Monolayer 2D GeS and SnS by Strain- Induced Band Gap Engineering, ACS Omega 5, 17207 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    H.-G. Min, C. Lyi, and Y . Kim, Tunable bulk photovoltaic effect in strained γ -GeSe, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205153 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    Ye et al., Manipulation of nonlinear optical responses in layered ferroelectric niobium oxide dihalides, Nat Commun 14, 5911 (2023)

    L. Ye et al., Manipulation of nonlinear optical responses in layered ferroelectric niobium oxide dihalides, Nat Commun 14, 5911 (2023)

    2023