Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 61 references

Multiwavelength Raman investigation of mono- and few-layer MoS2 grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition on SiO2

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Room-temperature pulsed laser deposition can grow a continuous monolayer of MoS2 on SiO2, and multiwavelength Raman shows that growth-induced defects selectively suppress the resonant coupling between A excitons and the out-of-plane A1g pho

desk verdict The monolayer synthesis result looks real and useful, but the defect-quenching interpretation of the resonant Raman data is not isolated from a substrate mismatch, so the paper needs revision before the EPC claim can stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13211 v1 pith:M5AQY2HT submitted 2026-07-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Alice Cartoceti (1) , Paolo D'Agosta (1) , Francesco Tumino (1) , Valeria Russo (1) , Carlo S. Casari (1) , Andrea Li Bassi (1) ((1) Department of Energy , Politecnico di Milano , Milano
show 1 more author
Italy)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords 2DMoS2pulsedlaserdepositionmonolayermultiwavelengthRamanspectroscopyexciton-phononcouplingA1gandE2g1modesstructuraldefectsSiO2substrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates that room-temperature pulsed laser deposition, followed by annealing in ultrahigh vacuum, can produce a continuous monolayer of MoS2 directly on SiO2, with the number of laser pulses controlling thickness from one to four layers. It then uses Raman spectra at three excitation wavelengths to show that exciton–phonon coupling in monolayer MoS2 is symmetry-dependent: the out-of-plane A1g mode responds most strongly to A-exciton resonance near 1.88 eV, while the in-plane E2g1 mode responds to the higher-energy C excitons near 2.71 eV. Comparing laser-grown films with mechanically exfoliated monolayers, the paper finds that growth-induced defects quench the A-exciton enhancement of A1g, so the A1g/E2g1 intensity ratio at 660 nm drops instead of rising. If correct, this makes room-temperature PLD a viable route to electronics-compatible monolayer MoS2 and gives a Raman-based probe of defect density in two-dimensional films.

What carries the argument

The central object is the wavelength-dependent A1g/E2g1 Raman intensity ratio, measured at 457, 532, and 660 nm, which acts as a symmetry-resolved probe of exciton–phonon coupling. The supporting identity is the Raman shift difference Δω between these two modes, used as a layer-number metric, together with a literature calibration that converts the disorder-activated LA(M) peak intensity into an interdefect distance via I(LA)/I(A1g) = 0.59 nm²/Ld². Together these tools connect layer assignment, defect density, and resonance behavior.

What would settle it

Image the same PLD monolayer with atomic-resolution microscopy (e.g., scanning tunneling microscopy or high-resolution TEM) and count the actual spacing of grain boundaries and vacancies. If the measured defect spacing is not in the 1–2 nm range implied by the LA(M)/A1g calibration, or does not decrease from four layers to one, the defect-quenching explanation for the missing 660-nm A1g enhancement is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that monolayer MoS2 on SiO2 can be synthesized at room temperature by PLD with 30 laser pulses and post-annealing, identifiable by a Raman shift difference of 20.3 ± 0.3 cm−1 and by A/B exciton photoluminescence at 1.89 and 2.1 eV, and that multiwavelength Raman spectroscopy of these films provides experimental evidence of symmetry-dependent exciton–phonon coupling: A1g couples to A excitons of Mo dz2 orbital character, while E2g1 couples to C excitons of mixed Mo dz2 and S px,py character. In pristine exfoliated monolayers, resonance with A excitons (660 nm excitation) enhances A1g and raises the A1g/E2g1 ratio, whereas resonance with C excitons (457 nm) enhances E2g1 a

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a calibration curve for the disorder-activated LA(M) Raman peak versus defect spacing, established on ion-bombarded exfoliated monolayers, transfers unchanged to these heavily defective, nanocrystalline laser-deposited films; if it does not, the quantitative defect densities and the defect-quenching account of the suppressed A1g resonance are unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature PLD with pulse-number control offers a low-thermal-budget route to monolayer and few-layer MoS2 on inert, electronics-compatible substrates, avoiding the high temperatures of conventional CVD or PLD.
  • The A1g/E2g1 intensity ratio at 660 nm versus 532 nm can serve as a qualitative defect-density indicator: a suppressed A-exciton enhancement signals high defectiveness.
  • Because the resonant enhancement is mode-selective, excitation wavelength becomes a critical parameter when comparing Raman intensities across MoS2 samples.
  • Defect density in this PLD process increases as layer number decreases, with estimated interdefect distances in the 1–2 nm range for the monolayer.
  • PLD-grown films retain their Raman fingerprints for at least 20 months in air, though first-order mode intensities decrease over time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the suppression is attributed to defects, post-growth sulfur annealing that reduces sulfur vacancies should partially restore the 660-nm A1g enhancement — a testable prediction the paper does not make.
  • The same three-wavelength A1g/E2g1 protocol could be applied to other monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (e.g., WS2, WSe2) to see whether defect-induced suppression of the A-exciton channel is a general phenomenon.
  • The strong resonance of the 2LA(M) overtone at 660 nm suggests that defect quantification via the LA(M)/A1g ratio should be restricted to non-resonant excitation; the paper itself uses 532 nm, but the resonance sensitivity highlights a caveat for future studies.
  • The island-to-continuous-layer transition between 20 and 30 pulses suggests growth on SiO2 is governed by MoS2–MoS2 adhesion; tuning deposition rate or substrate temperature could lower the coverage threshold for a closed monolayer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports room-temperature pulsed laser deposition (PLD) of MoS2 on SiO2 with post-deposition UHV annealing, using the number of laser pulses to control film thickness. The 30-pulse film is assigned as monolayer on the basis of the E2g1-A1g frequency difference (Δω = 20.3 ± 0.3 cm−1) and the presence of A/B exciton PL peaks at 1.89 and 2.1 eV. Multiwavelength Raman measurements at 457, 532, and 660 nm are used to study resonance effects: the 2LA(M)/A1g ratio increases under A-exciton resonance; the A1g(n-layer)/A1g(monolayer) ratio increases with thickness at 660 nm; and the A1g/E2g1 ratio in the exfoliated monolayer shows the expected enhancement at 660 nm, whereas the PLD-grown monolayer shows a suppression. This suppression is attributed to growth-induced defects that quench A-exciton coupling to the A1g mode, providing what the paper claims is experimental evidence of symmetry-dependent exciton-phonon coupling in PLD-grown monolayer MoS2.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would demonstrate a low-thermal-budget synthesis route to monolayer MoS2 on an electronics-compatible substrate and introduce the A1g/E2g1 resonant intensity ratio as a defect probe for 2D TMDs. The multiwavelength Raman dataset and the 20-month stability study are useful additions. However, the comparative claim about defect-induced suppression of A1g resonance rests on a substrate confound, and the quantitative defect-density estimates depend on an external calibration that may not transfer to nanocrystalline PLD films. These issues are load-bearing and currently limit the significance of the paper; with additional control experiments the work could become a valuable contribution to PLD-grown TMD research.

major comments (3)
  1. [Multiwavelength Raman investigation of 2D MoS2] Figure 4c compares the PLD-grown monolayer on 285 nm SiO2/Si with a mechanically exfoliated monolayer on a 200 µm thick SiO2 substrate. The A1g/E2g1 intensity ratio is strongly affected by optical interference in the substrate stack and by dielectric screening of the exciton resonance. The argument that overlapping phonon positions prove equivalent intrinsic vibrational properties does not address these electronic/environmental effects. The observed suppression at 660 nm for the PLD film could therefore be a substrate-induced detuning of the A-exciton resonance rather than defect quenching. No error bars are shown for the ratios, so it is also unclear whether the PLD/exfoliated difference at 660 nm is statistically significant. Because the central claim of defect-modulated exciton-phonon coupling rests entirely on this comparison, a same-substrate control (e.g., exfoliated monolayer on 2
  2. [Monolayer production via room temperature PLD on SiO2] The 30-pulse film is assigned as monolayer from Δω = 20.3 ± 0.3 cm−1, calibrated against high-temperature PLD literature values (Refs. 16, 17, 20, 48), while the exfoliated monolayer on SiO2 measured by the authors gives Δω = 18.8 ± 0.2 cm−1. The difference is substantial and could correspond to a bilayer or a strained monolayer. The PL A/B peaks at 1.89/2.1 eV are not conclusive: their absence in the 90-pulse sample may simply reflect the much weaker PL of indirect-gap multilayer MoS2, and no PL spectrum of the 90-pulse film is shown beyond this statement. Direct thickness evidence (AFM, cross-sectional TEM/STEM, or a calibrated exfoliated reference on the identical 285 nm SiO2/Si substrate) is needed to support the monolayer and few-layer assignments.
  3. [Defects in 2D MoS2] Equation (1) and Fig. 2b apply the Mignuzzi relation I(LA)/I(A1g) = C/Ld2 with C(A1g) = 0.59 ± 0.03 nm2, a coefficient calibrated on ion-bombarded exfoliated monolayers on SiO2 (Ref. 35). The PLD films studied here are nanocrystalline, with grain boundaries likely dominating the disorder; the deduced Ld values (1.24–2.15 nm) are so small that the concept of isolated point defects separated by Ld is physically questionable. At such defect densities the LA(M)/A1g ratio may saturate or be influenced by finite-size phonon confinement. Thus the quantitative defect-density gradient used to support the interpretation of Fig. 4c is not validated for this materials system, and the defect-density numbers should be regarded as qualitative at best unless a calibration specific to PLD-grown films is provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 1c caption] Typo: 'esfoliation' should be 'exfoliation'.
  2. [Figure 4c] No error bars are shown for the intensity ratios. Since each sample was measured three times, the uncertainties should be included and propagated.
  3. [Methods] The Raman excitation power is given (7 mW), but spot size, power density, and acquisition times are not reported. This information is needed to interpret intensity ratios quantitatively.
  4. [Introduction/Abstract] The abstract states that experimental reports of symmetry-selective exciton–phonon coupling 'remain limited,' but Ref. 42 (Carvalho et al.) already reported this effect in exfoliated MoS2. The novelty here should be framed as the PLD/defect context rather than the first observation of the effect.
  5. [Figure 3c] The missing 20-pulse data point at 660 nm (due to low signal-to-noise) is mentioned in the text but should also be noted in the figure caption for clarity.
  6. [References] Ref. 48 is an arXiv preprint; if a peer-reviewed version exists, it should be cited instead. Also check that journal names in the reference list are complete and consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: layer-number, defect-density, and resonance assignments rest on independent literature calibrations and external theory; self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not self-referential. The monolayer assignment uses measured Δω = 20.3 ± 0.3 cm−1, compared to literature values for exfoliated monolayers (18.8 ± 0.2 cm−1) and prior high-temperature PLD monolayers, plus PL A/B peaks at 1.89/2.1 eV; these are independent external calibrations. Defect densities are estimated with the Mignuzzi relation I(LA(M))/I(A1g) = 0.59 ± 0.03 nm²/Ld², an external coefficient obtained by ion-bombarding exfoliated monolayers (Ref. 35); the paper does not fit this coefficient to its own data, and the LA(M)/A1g ratios at 532 nm are measured, not retrofitted. The resonance interpretation (A1g coupling to A excitons, E2g1 coupling to C excitons) is taken from external theory (Qiu et al., Carvalho et al.) and prior resonant Raman literature, then tested against measured A1g/E2g1 ratios; the PLD-vs-exfoliated difference at 660 nm is a measurement, not an output of the interpretation. Self-citations (Refs. 24, 25, 54) describe the PLD procedure on metal substrates and are not used to prove the central SiO2 monolayer claim; that claim is supported by independent Raman/PL calibrations. The different SiO2 substrate thicknesses between PLD-grown and exfoliated reference samples is a possible experimental confound but not a circular reduction, so it is a correctness risk rather than circularity. Hence, no circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on external calibrations and physical models adopted from prior literature rather than derived here: the Δω vs layer-number scale, the Mignuzzi defect-scattering coefficient, the orbital character of A/B/C excitons, and the McCreary B/A PL quality metric. None of these are re-validated for the specific nanocrystalline RT-PLD films, which is the main epistemic risk.

free parameters (2)
  • Mignuzzi defect-scattering coefficient C(A1g) = 0.59 ± 0.03 nm² (from Ref. 35)
    Used to convert measured I(LA)/I(A1g) into interdefect distance Ld for all PLD films; assumed transferable from ion-bombarded exfoliated monolayer to heavily defective nanocrystalline films.
  • Mignuzzi defect-scattering coefficient C(E2g1) = 1.11 ± 0.08 nm² (from Ref. 35)
    Defined in Ref. 35 alongside C(A1g); part of the adopted defect-density model, though not directly used in the paper's Ld calculation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Δω (E2g1–A1g separation) decreases monotonically with layer number on weakly interacting substrates, with literature calibrations for exfoliated (18.8 cm−1) and HT-PLD (20.5 cm−1) monolayers.
    Used to assign 30p→monolayer, 90p→3L, 120p→4L without direct thickness measurement (§3, Figure 1b).
  • domain assumption Mignuzzi relation I(LA)/I(X) = C/Ld² from Ref. 35 applies to RT-PLD nanocrystalline films.
    Central to all interdefect distance values and the defect-density narrative (§3, 'Defects in 2D MoS2').
  • domain assumption A and B excitons derive predominantly from Mo dz² orbitals; C excitons from mixed Mo dz² + S px/py, so symmetry dictates coupling of A1g with A/B excitons and E2g1 with C excitons.
    Adopted from Refs. 42, 49 to interpret wavelength-dependent A1g/E2g1 ratio (§3, 'Multiwavelength Raman investigation').
  • domain assumption McCreary B/A PL intensity ratio increases with defect density, and A-exciton quenching is stronger than B-exciton quenching.
    Used to infer larger defectiveness of PLD monolayer from B/A = 0.7 vs 0.17 and to explain the 660-nm suppression of A1g (§3, Figure 1c).
  • domain assumption Resonance at 660 nm (1.88 eV) selectively enhances A1g via A-exciton coupling; 457 nm (2.71 eV) selectively enhances E2g1 via C-exciton coupling.
    The premise of the symmetry-dependent EPC claim; underlying theory from Refs. 42, 49.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiwavelength Raman investigation of mono- and few-layer MoS2 grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition on SiO2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M5AQY2HT

@misc{pith2026260713211,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiwavelength Raman investigation of mono- and few-layer MoS2 grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition on SiO2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M5AQY2HT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13211}
}
abstract

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS$_2$) is a semiconductor whose vibrational and excitonic properties are highly sensitive to layer number and structural disorder. We demonstrate the growth of MoS$_2$ monolayers on inert, electronics-compatible SiO$_2$ substrates using room-temperature pulsed laser deposition (PLD). Control of the process parameters enables tuning from monolayer to multilayer films, which we investigate by multiwavelength Raman spectroscopy. The evolution of the Raman-shift difference between the $E_{2g}^{1}$ and $A_{1g}$ modes, combined with an assessment of defect density, tracks film growth as a function of the number of deposition laser pulses. Although excitonic effects strongly influence the optical response of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides, experimental reports of symmetry-selective exciton-phonon coupling remain limited. We provide experimental evidence of symmetry-dependent exciton-phonon coupling in PLD-grown monolayer MoS$_2$. Specifically, we observe modulation of the resonant behaviour of the out-of-plane $A_{1g}$ and in-plane $E_{2g}^{1}$ modes, related to their different coupling to A excitons, predominantly derived from Mo $d_{z^2}$ orbitals, and C excitons, characterized by mixed orbital contributions from Mo $d_{z^2}$ and S $p_x$ and $p_y$ states. Comparison with mechanically exfoliated monolayers reveals the role of growth-induced defects in modulating these interactions. These findings establish room-temperature PLD as a viable approach for growing two-dimensional MoS$_2$ on inert, electronics-compatible substrates and provide insight into the interplay between excitonic resonances and growth-induced disorder in two-dimensional MoS$_2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13211 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Raman spectra, acquired at 532 nm, of low-dimensional MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Example of Raman spectrum of MoS2 monolayer grown via PLD on SiO2 fitted by Voigt functions. Magenta circles represent the raw data, the dashed blue lines are the deconvoluted components of the Raman peaks, and the violet solid line represents the resulting fit. (b) Intensity ratio between LA(M) and A1g peaks (red) and interdefect distance LD (green) as a function of the number of laser pulses employed during th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Raman spectra, acquired at 532 nm (green), 457 nm (blue), and 660 nm (red), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Intensity ratio between 2LA(M) and A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Photolumines- cence from chemically exfoliated MoS2.Nano letters2011,11, 5111–5116

    Eda, G.; Yamaguchi, H.; Voiry, D.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.; Chhowalla, M. Photolumines- cence from chemically exfoliated MoS2.Nano letters2011,11, 5111–5116

  2. [2]

    Single-layer MoS2 transistors.Nature nanotechnology2011,6, 147–150

    Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, V.; Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors.Nature nanotechnology2011,6, 147–150

  3. [3]

    Strain-engineered artificial atom as a broad- spectrum solar energy funnel.Nature Photonics2012,6, 866–872

    Feng, J.; Qian, X.; Huang, C.-W.; Li, J. Strain-engineered artificial atom as a broad- spectrum solar energy funnel.Nature Photonics2012,6, 866–872

  4. [4]

    F.; Shan, J

    He, K.; Poole, C.; Mak, K. F.; Shan, J. Experimental demonstration of continuous electronic structure tuning via strain in atomically thin MoS2.Nano letters2013,13, 2931–2936. 19

  5. [5]

    Y.; Liu, X.; Jie, W.; Chan, N

    Hui, Y. Y.; Liu, X.; Jie, W.; Chan, N. Y.; Hao, J.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Li, L.-J.; Guo, W.; Lau, S. P. Exceptional tunability of band energy in a compressively strained trilayer MoS2 sheet.ACS nano2013,7, 7126–7131

  6. [6]

    F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T

    Mak, K. F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor.Physical review letters2010,105, 136805

  7. [7]

    Li, H.; Yin, Z.; He, Q.; Li, H.; Huang, X.; Lu, G.; Fam, D. W. H.; Tok, A. I. Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H. Fabrication of single-and multilayer MoS2 film-based field-effect transistors for sensing NO at room temperature.small2012,8, 63–67

  8. [8]

    H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J

    Wang, Q. H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J. N.; Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Nature nan- otechnology2012,7, 699–712

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Few-layer MoS2: a promising layered semiconductor.ACS nano 2014,8, 4074–4099

    Ganatra, R.; Zhang, Q. Few-layer MoS2: a promising layered semiconductor.ACS nano 2014,8, 4074–4099

    2014

  2. [10]

    Roadmap and direction toward high-performance MoS2 hydrogen evolution catalysts.ACS nano2021,15, 11014–11039

    Cao, Y. Roadmap and direction toward high-performance MoS2 hydrogen evolution catalysts.ACS nano2021,15, 11014–11039

  3. [11]

    H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y

    Choi, W.; Choudhary, N.; Han, G. H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y. H. Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Materials Today2017,20, 116–130

  4. [12]

    Liu, K.-K.; Zhang, W.; Lee, Y.-H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Chang, M.-T.; Su, C.-Y.; Chang, C.-S.; Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, H.; others Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates.Nano letters2012,12, 1538–1544

  5. [13]

    K.; Alsaadi, R

    Xu, X.; Guo, T.; Kim, H.; Hota, M. K.; Alsaadi, R. S.; Lanza, M.; Zhang, X.; Alsha- reef, H. N. Growth of 2D materials at the wafer scale.Advanced Materials2022,34, 2108258. 20

  6. [14]

    V.; Kim, H

    Mandyam, S. V.; Kim, H. M.; Drndić, M. Large area few-layer TMD film growths and their applications.Journal of Physics: Materials2020,3, 024008

  7. [15]

    J.; Shaikh, P

    Late, D. J.; Shaikh, P. A.; Khare, R.; Kashid, R. V.; Chaudhary, M.; More, M. A.; Ogale, S. B. Pulsed laser-deposited MoS2 thin films on W and Si: field emission and photoresponse studies.ACS applied materials & interfaces2014,6, 15881–15888

  8. [16]

    I.; Yoo, S

    Serna, M. I.; Yoo, S. H.; Moreno, S.; Xi, Y.; Oviedo, J. P.; Choi, H.; Alshareef, H. N.; Kim, M. J.; Minary-Jolandan, M.; Quevedo-Lopez, M. A. Large-area deposition of MoS2 by pulsed laser deposition with in situ thickness control.Acs Nano2016,10, 6054–6061

  9. [17]

    R.; Diamond, A

    Serrao, C. R.; Diamond, A. M.; Hsu, S.-L.; You, L.; Gadgil, S.; Clarkson, J.; Carraro, C.; Maboudian, R.; Hu, C.; Salahuddin, S. Highly crystalline MoS2 thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition.Applied Physics Letters2015,106

  10. [18]

    H.; Lee, S

    Seo, S.; Choi, H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.; Yoon, S.; Lee, B. H.; Lee, S. Growth of centimeter-scale monolayer and few-layer WSe2 thin films on SiO2/Si substrate via pulsed laser deposition.Advanced Materials Interfaces2018,5, 1800524

  11. [19]

    C.; Tiwari, A

    Siegel, G.; Venkata Subbaiah, Y.; Prestgard, M. C.; Tiwari, A. Growth of centimeter- scale atomically thin MoS2 films by pulsed laser deposition.APL materials2015,3

  12. [20]

    K.; Jha, S.; Kumar, Y.; Gupta, V.; Tomar, M

    Sinha, S.; Kumar, S.; Arora, S. K.; Jha, S.; Kumar, Y.; Gupta, V.; Tomar, M. Study of band alignment at MoS2/SiO2 interfaces grown by pulsed laser deposition method. Journal of Applied Physics2021,129

  13. [21]

    Y.; Romanov, R.; Nevolin, V.; Fominski, D.; Komleva, O.; Popov, V

    Fominski, V. Y.; Romanov, R.; Nevolin, V.; Fominski, D.; Komleva, O.; Popov, V. Formation of ultrathin MoS2 films using laser-based methods. Journal of Physics: Con- ference Series. 2019; p 012007

    2019

  14. [22]

    21 Annealing effects on sulfur vacancies and electronic transport of MoS2 films grown by pulsed-laser deposition.Applied Physics Letters2019,115

    Xie, M.; Zhou, J.; Ji, H.; Ye, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, K.; Shang, L.; Hu, Z.; Chu, J. 21 Annealing effects on sulfur vacancies and electronic transport of MoS2 films grown by pulsed-laser deposition.Applied Physics Letters2019,115

  15. [23]

    R.; Lin, Y.-C.; Sang, X.; Puretzky, A

    Bertoldo, F.; Unocic, R. R.; Lin, Y.-C.; Sang, X.; Puretzky, A. A.; Yu, Y.; Miakota, D.; Rouleau, C. M.; Schou, J.; Thygesen, K. S.; others Intrinsic defects in MoS2 grown by pulsed laser deposition: from monolayers to bilayers.ACS nano2021,15, 2858–2868

  16. [24]

    S.; Passoni, M.; Russo, V.; Bassi, A

    Tumino, F.; Casari, C. S.; Passoni, M.; Russo, V.; Bassi, A. L. Pulsed laser deposition of single-layer MoS 2 on Au (111): from nanosized crystals to large-area films.Nanoscale Advances2019,1, 643–655

  17. [25]

    Tumino, F.; Grazianetti, C.; Martella, C.; Ruggeri, M.; Russo, V.; Li Bassi, A.; Molle, A.; Casari, C. S. Hydrophilic character of single-layer MoS2 grown on Ag (111).The Journal of Physical Chemistry C2021,125, 9479–9485

  18. [26]

    G.; Azam, N.; Uno- cic, R

    Jaiswal, S.; Fathi-Hafshejani, P.; Yakupoglu, B.; Boebinger, M. G.; Azam, N.; Uno- cic, R. R.; Hamilton, M. C.; Mahjouri-Samani, M. Wafer-scale synthesis of 2D materials by an amorphous phase-mediated crystallization approach.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces2023,15, 39697–39706

  19. [27]

    Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multi- layer to bulk material.Chemical Society Reviews2015,44, 2757–2785

    Zhang, X.; Qiao, X.-F.; Shi, W.; Wu, J.-B.; Jiang, D.-S.; Tan, P.-H. Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multi- layer to bulk material.Chemical Society Reviews2015,44, 2757–2785

  20. [28]

    Low-frequency Raman modes and electronic excitations in atomically thin MoS 2 films.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics2012,86, 241301

    Zeng, H.; Zhu, B.; Liu, K.; Fan, J.; Cui, X.; Zhang, Q. Low-frequency Raman modes and electronic excitations in atomically thin MoS 2 films.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics2012,86, 241301

  21. [29]

    R.; Sood, A.; Rao, C

    Chakraborty, B.; Matte, H. R.; Sood, A.; Rao, C. Layer-dependent resonant Raman scattering of a few layer MoS2.Journal of Raman Spectroscopy2013,44, 92–96. 22

  22. [30]

    Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS 2 and WS 2

    Molina-Sanchez, A.; Wirtz, L. Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS 2 and WS 2. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics2011,84, 155413

  23. [31]

    Placidi, M.; Dimitrievska, M.; Izquierdo-Roca, V.; Fontané, X.; Castellanos- Gomez, A.; Pérez-Tomás, A.; Mestres, N.; Espindola-Rodriguez, M.; López-Marino, S.; Neuschitzer, M.; others Multiwavelength excitation Raman scattering analysis of bulk and two-dimensional MoS2: vibra...

  24. [32]

    Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yap, C. C. R.; Tay, B. K.; Edwin, T. H. T.; Olivier, A.; Baillargeat, D. From bulk to monolayer MoS2: evolution of Raman scattering.Advanced Functional Materials2012,22, 1385–1390

  25. [33]

    Lee,C.; Yan,H.; Brus,L.E.; Heinz,T.F.; Hone,J.; Ryu,S.Anomalouslatticevibrations of single-and few-layer MoS2.ACS nano2010,4, 2695–2700

  26. [34]

    Ottaviano, L.; Palleschi, S.; Perrozzi, F.; D’Olimpio, G.; Priante, F.; Donarelli, M.; Benassi, P.; Nardone, M.; Gonchigsuren, M.; Gombosuren, M.; others Mechanical exfoli- ation and layer number identification of MoS2 revisited.2D Materials2017,4, 045013

  27. [35]

    J.; Bonini, N.; Brennan, B.; Gilmore, I

    Mignuzzi, S.; Pollard, A. J.; Bonini, N.; Brennan, B.; Gilmore, I. S.; Pimenta, M. A.; Richards, D.; Roy, D. Effect of disorder on Raman scattering of single-layer Mo S 2. Physical Review B2015,91, 195411

  28. [36]

    G.; Lin, Y.-C.; Sales, M

    Stanford, M. G.; Lin, Y.-C.; Sales, M. G.; Hoffman, A. N.; Nelson, C. T.; Xiao, K.; McDonnell, S.; Rack, P. D. Lithographically patterned metallic conduction in single- layer MoS2 via plasma processing.npj 2D Materials and Applications2019,3, 13

  29. [37]

    Electronic structure of MoSe 2, MoS 2, and WSe

    Coehoorn, R.; Haas, C.; De Groot, R. Electronic structure of MoSe 2, MoS 2, and WSe

  30. [38]

    The nature of the optical band gaps.Physical Review B1987,35, 6203

    II. The nature of the optical band gaps.Physical Review B1987,35, 6203. 23

  31. [39]

    Resonant Raman scattering at exciton states tuned by pressure and temperature in 2 H-MoS 2.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics2010,81, 195209

    Livneh, T.; Sterer, E. Resonant Raman scattering at exciton states tuned by pressure and temperature in 2 H-MoS 2.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics2010,81, 195209

  32. [40]

    M.; Hanbicki, A

    McCreary, K. M.; Hanbicki, A. T.; Sivaram, S. V.; Jonker, B. T. A-and B-exciton photoluminescence intensity ratio as a measure of sample quality for transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers.Apl Materials2018,6

  33. [41]

    Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides.Physical review letters2012, 108, 196802

    Xiao, D.; Liu, G.-B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides.Physical review letters2012, 108, 196802

  34. [42]

    Burns, K.; Tan, A. M. Z.; Gabriel, A.; Shao, L.; Hennig, R. G.; Aitkaliyeva, A. Control- ling neutral and charged excitons in MoS2 with defects.Journal of Materials Research 2020,35, 949–957

    2020

  35. [43]

    R.; Malard, L

    Carvalho, B. R.; Malard, L. M.; Alves, J. M.; Fantini, C.; Pimenta, M. A. Erratum: Symmetry-dependent exciton-phonon coupling in 2D and bulk MoS 2 observed by reso- nance Raman scattering [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 136403 (2015)].Physical Review Letters 2016,116, 089904

    2015

  36. [44]

    Resonant Raman pro- files andµ-photoluminescence of atomically thin layers of molybdenum disulfide.physica status solidi (b)2012,249, 2644–2647

    Scheuschner, N.; Ochedowski, O.; Schleberger, M.; Maultzsch, J. Resonant Raman pro- files andµ-photoluminescence of atomically thin layers of molybdenum disulfide.physica status solidi (b)2012,249, 2644–2647

    2012

  37. [45]

    K.; Lucero, M

    Ellis, J. K.; Lucero, M. J.; Scuseria, G. E. The indirect to direct band gap transition in multilayered MoS2 as predicted by screened hybrid density functional theory.Applied physics letters2011,99

  38. [46]

    Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program.Applied Crystallography 2010,43, 1126–1128

    Wojdyr, M. Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program.Applied Crystallography 2010,43, 1126–1128. 24

    2010

  39. [47]

    Surface-phonon dispersion of MoS 2.Physical Review B1991,44, 5745

    Bertrand, P. Surface-phonon dispersion of MoS 2.Physical Review B1991,44, 5745

  40. [48]

    Raman spectroscopic studies on two-dimensional ma- terials.Applied Microscopy2015,45, 126–130

    Lee, J.-U.; Kim, M.; Cheong, H. Raman spectroscopic studies on two-dimensional ma- terials.Applied Microscopy2015,45, 126–130

  41. [49]

    M.; Lou, J

    Zhan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Najmaei, S.; Ajayan, P. M.; Lou, J. Large area vapor phase growth and characterization of MoS2 atomic layers on SiO2 substrate.arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.50722011,

  42. [50]

    Y.; Da Jornada, F

    Qiu, D. Y.; Da Jornada, F. H.; Louie, S. G. Optical spectrum of MoS 2: many-body effects and diversity of exciton states.Physical review letters2013,111, 216805

  43. [51]

    G.; Huang, L

    Shi, H.; Yan, R.; Bertolazzi, S.; Brivio, J.; Gao, B.; Kis, A.; Jena, D.; Xing, H. G.; Huang, L. Exciton dynamics in suspended monolayer and few-layer MoS2 2D crystals. ACS nano2013,7, 1072–1080

  44. [52]

    Slow cooling of high-energy C excitons is limited by intervalley-transfer in monolayer MoS2.Laser & Photonics Reviews2019,13, 1800270

    Li, Y.; Shi, J.; Chen, H.; Mi, Y.; Du, W.; Sui, X.; Jiang, C.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Liu, X. Slow cooling of high-energy C excitons is limited by intervalley-transfer in monolayer MoS2.Laser & Photonics Reviews2019,13, 1800270

  45. [53]

    Reso- nance Raman scattering in transition-metal dichalcogenides.J

    Sekine, T.; Nakashizu, T.; Izumi, M.; Toyoda, K.; Uchinokura, K.; Matsuura, E. Reso- nance Raman scattering in transition-metal dichalcogenides.J. Phys. Soc. Japan1980, 49, 551–554

  46. [54]

    Defect-mediated exciton localization and relaxation in monolayer MoS2.ACS nano2024,18, 34322–34331

    Qu, J.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, L.; Tan, R.; Li, W.; Shi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Gao, B.; Li, X. Defect-mediated exciton localization and relaxation in monolayer MoS2.ACS nano2024,18, 34322–34331

  47. [55]

    Surface-Sensitive Raman Response of Metal-Supported Monolayer MoS2.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C2025, 25

    Tumino,F.; Tosoni,S.; D’Agosta,P.; Russo,V.; Bottani,C.E.; LiBassi,A.; Casari,C.S. Surface-Sensitive Raman Response of Metal-Supported Monolayer MoS2.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C2025, 25

  48. [56]

    Critical-point analysis of the two-phonon Raman spectrum of silicon.Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids1974,35, 171– 180

    Uchinokura, K.; Sekine, T.; Matsuura, E. Critical-point analysis of the two-phonon Raman spectrum of silicon.Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids1974,35, 171– 180

  49. [57]

    E”Raman Mode in Thermal Strain-Fractured CVD-MoS2.Crystals2016,6, 151

    Wu, D.; Huang, H.; Zhu, X.; He, Y.; Xie, Q.; Chen, X.; Zheng, X.; Duan, H.; Gao, Y. E”Raman Mode in Thermal Strain-Fractured CVD-MoS2.Crystals2016,6, 151

  50. [58]

    L.; Tenne, R.; Matthews, M

    Frey, G. L.; Tenne, R.; Matthews, M. J.; Dresselhaus, M.; Dresselhaus, G. Raman and resonance Raman investigation of MoS 2 nanoparticles.Physical Review B1999,60, 2883

  51. [59]

    The one phonon Raman spectrum in microcrystalline silicon.Solid State Communications1981,39, 625–629

    Richter, H.; Wang, Z.; Ley, L. The one phonon Raman spectrum in microcrystalline silicon.Solid State Communications1981,39, 625–629

  52. [60]

    J.; Brennan, B.; Stec, H.; Tyler, B

    Pollard, A. J.; Brennan, B.; Stec, H.; Tyler, B. J.; Seah, M. P.; Gilmore, I. S.; Roy, D. Quantitative characterization of defect size in graphene using Raman spectroscopy.Ap- plied Physics Letters2014,105

  53. [61]

    Interlayer resonant Raman modes in few-layer MoS 2.Physical Review B2015,91, 235409

    Scheuschner, N.; Gillen, R.; Staiger, M.; Maultzsch, J. Interlayer resonant Raman modes in few-layer MoS 2.Physical Review B2015,91, 235409. 26 Supporting Information: Multiwavelength Raman investigation of mono- and few-layer MoS 2 grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition on SiO 2 Al...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.