REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references
Exact collective first-passage statistics of N trail-interacting walkers
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read For N walkers sharing a saturating trail, the probability that exactly k of them are absorbed at a given wall is an exact closed form, and it is the same whether the walkers start together or one after another.
desk verdict Clean formulas and a valuable protocol-invariance claim, but the simultaneous-start mixed-absorption results are labeled exact while the SM concedes the key process is unsolved. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the cumulative local-time field L(x) at the stopping time when all N walkers are absorbed. For SATW_phi, the Ray-Knight/Pólya-urn representation of a single self-interacting walk is extended to N walkers: in the scaling limit, L(x) is a squared Bessel process BESQ^{2(N+phi-1)} on the explored side and an absorbed/reflected BESQ^{2(1-phi)} on the unexplored side. The proof of protocol equivalence uses additivity of squared Bessel processes—the sum of independent BESQ processes of dimensions d1 and d2 is a BESQ of dimension d1+d2—so that N sequentially launched walkers produce the same cumulative local-time law as N simultaneous ones. Splitting probabilities then fol
What would settle it
The most direct check is a high-statistics lattice simulation of N=3 or N=4 SATW_phi walkers with phi≠1, comparing simultaneous versus sequential launches for mixed-absorption events (0<k<N): any systematic difference in P(+k|x0) beyond Monte Carlo error would falsify the protocol-invariance claim. A second, sharper test is to verify Eq. (4) numerically near x0=0 or x0=1, where the exponent k+phi-1 controls the behaviour; the exact BESQ integration in Eq. (8) should be validated independently of the urn extension.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper's central discovery is an exact distribution for which walls absorb which walkers: for N SATW_phi walkers in the interval [0,1] starting at x0, the probability that exactly k are absorbed at the right wall is binom(N+2(phi-1), k+phi-1) x0^{k+phi-1}(1-x0)^{N-k+phi-1}, with the two extremes given by regularized incomplete Beta functions I_{1-x0}(N+phi-1, phi) and I_{x0}(N+phi-1, phi). These probabilities are normalized and are exactly equal for simultaneous and sequential launch protocols. The same construction yields generalized persistence exponents theta_{k,N} = (k+phi-1)/2, recovering the known single-walker exponent phi/2 and the independent-Brownian k/2 at phi=1. The authors de
Load-bearing premise
The N-walker extension of the Ray-Knight/Pólya-urn construction is load-bearing: SM §2.1.1 explicitly 'supposes' the urn scheme still works for several walkers, §2.2.1 states the mixed-absorption (both walls reached) process is not solved and that protocol independence 'should not change the description,' and a rigorous convergence proof is cited only for N=1; if this extension or the protocol-invariance assertion fails, Eqs. (2)-(5) are not exact.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For any N and any saturating trail strength phi, splitting probabilities and persistence exponents are known in closed form; simulations in the paper confirm them for several saturating models beyond the exact SATW_phi case.
- Sequential and simultaneous launching protocols produce identical absorption statistics for SATW_phi, while the paper's numerics show the two protocols genuinely differ for nonsaturating trail interactions (e.g., TSAW and PSRW), so protocol equivalence is a fingerprint of saturation.
- Repulsive trails (phi<1) lower the generalized persistence exponents, making long-lived non-reactive trajectories more probable; attractive trails (phi>1) suppress them.
- The last-survival exponent theta_{1,N} for generic self-interacting random walks equals the single-walker exponent theta_{1,1}, independent of N—a result the paper derives by a direct argument and verifies numerically.
- The small-x0 decay of the splitting probabilities, combined with the scaling argument, yields the full spectrum theta_{k,N} without separately computing survival probabilities.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: Eq. (4) is the probability mass function of a beta-binomial distribution with parameters (N + 2(phi-1), k + phi-1), so one could view the absorption counts as arising from independent draws with a beta-distributed propensity; the paper does not make this connection.
- Editorial inference: protocol invariance for saturating trails suggests the launching order is irrelevant for all observables built on the cumulative local-time field, such as order statistics of absorption times; this remains to be tested beyond the splitting probabilities computed here.
- Editorial inference: the paper's numerics for many simultaneous TSAWs show a sharply peaked Gaussian splitting distribution with standard deviation growing as N^{1/4}; deriving this scaling from a hydrodynamic or field-theoretic description is a natural next step but goes beyond what the paper proves.
- Editorial inference: a rigorous N-walker Ray-Knight convergence theorem (the paper cites only the N=1 case) would place the BESQ representation on firmer ground and could extend the approach to multiple targets or heterogeneous boundary conditions.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies N one-dimensional self-interacting random walks that share a common trail (local-time) field, focusing on first-passage observables. For the saturating class SATW_phi, it claims exact generalized persistence exponents theta_{k,N}=(k+phi-1)/2 for the k-th survival event and exact splitting probabilities in the interval [0,1], Eqs. (4)-(5), for both simultaneous and sequential launching protocols. For generic nonsaturating self-interacting walks it claims theta_{1,N}=theta_{1,1} for the last survivor. The derivations extend Toth's Ray-Knight/BESQ local-time representation to N walkers and use the sequential-start construction to compute mixed-absorption splitting probabilities, invoking protocol independence for SATW_phi. Numerical simulations are presented for SATW_phi and for TSAW/PSRW/SESRW models.
Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper provides the first exact collective first-passage statistics for strongly history-dependent interacting walkers, including a striking and nontrivial protocol-invariance property. The explicit formulas are simple and falsifiable, and the paper correctly reproduces the known limits phi=1 (independent Brownian walkers) and N=1 (single SATW_phi). It also carefully uses existing rigorous single-particle results (Toth 1996; Bremont et al. 2025) as inputs, and the numerical support in Figs. 2-3 and the supplementary tables is substantial. The weakness is that the N-particle Ray-Knight extension and the simultaneous/sequential equivalence are not rigorously established; the supplementary text itself labels the key steps as 'supposed' or 'should not change'. Thus the paper's exactness claims go beyond what is currently proven, and the significance of the results is contingent on closing that gap or clearly restating the claims as conjectural.
major comments (3)
- [SM §2.2.1–2.2.3; Eq. (4)] The central formula (4) for mixed-absorption events with 0<k<N is derived in the supplementary material for the sequential-start protocol only. SM §2.2.1 explicitly states that the inhomogeneous local-time process for mixed absorption is unsolved and that protocol independence 'should not change the description'. The subsequent calculation in §2.2.2–2.2.3 computes P(+k|x0) by ordering the particles sequentially and then combining events (m-+...) and (m+-...). Since the advertised simultaneous-start result is the headline of the paper, and Eq. (4) is asserted to hold for both protocols, the exactness of the simultaneous-start formula is not established. The numerical agreement in Fig. 3(a) is suggestive but is not a proof. Either a proof of the protocol-invariance for mixed-absorption events must be supplied, or the claims must be weakened to state that Eq. (4) is derived for sequential s
- [SM §2.1.1, §2.1.3; Eq. (5)] Even the all-at-one-wall result Eq. (5) rests on an unproved N-particle extension of Toth's Ray-Knight theorem. SM §2.1.1 begins 'We first suppose that the Pólya urn scheme can still be used' for N>1, and §2.1.3 notes that rigorous convergence in law is given in [1] only for N=1. The recurrence (2.2) and the resulting BESQ representation (2.5)-(2.6) are thus heuristic for N>1. Since Eq. (5) and the derivation of Eq. (8) depend directly on this representation, the exactness of the N-particle splitting probabilities for all-at-one-wall events is not rigorously supported. The paper should either provide a proof or reference a proof of the N-particle local-time limit, or explicitly mark this step as a conjecture.
- [Main text: 'Determination of θ(SIRW)1,N'; Eq. (3)] The claim that the last-survival exponent for generic SIRWs equals the single-walker exponent, Eq. (3), is argued in the text by asserting that the last walker spends negligible time in the region previously visited by other walkers, because the probability of staying in the finite interval R decays exponentially. This argument is not made rigorous, and it is not obvious that it holds for all SIRWs, in particular for nonsaturating attractive interactions where a walker might be effectively trapped in an already-visited region. The numerical support in Fig. 2(b) covers TSAW, PSRW, and SESRW, which are repulsive or nonattractive models. The claim should either be restricted to the class for which the argument is valid or replaced by a precise statement of the needed assumptions, with a proof or at least a more explicit controlling argument.
minor comments (5)
- [SM Table 3(b), k=2 row] The reported point estimate 2.220 and the 95% CI [1.188,1.272] are mutually inconsistent, and the CI does not contain the theoretical value 2.25. This appears to be a transcription or data-entry error; the table should be corrected or the text should explain the discrepancy.
- [SM §2.4] The 'another way' of recovering theta_{k,N} uses phrases such as 'We can reasonably consider' and 'it is very likely that' to argue that the leftmost particle behaves as a single SATW and the others as Brownian walkers in its wake. This is heuristic and should be labeled as such, not presented as an independent derivation.
- [Eq. (4) and text after Eq. (5)] The normalization of Eq. (4) is asserted ('Although not obvious from Eqs. (4)-(5), these probabilities are normalized') but not demonstrated. A short verification or a reference for the generalized binomial identity would be helpful.
- [SM §3.4 and Annex A] There are several typos: 'persistence expontents' (SM §3.4), 'deacease' (Annex A.5), 'praticaly' (Annex A.5), 'cumpute' (SM §2.2.1). These should be corrected.
- [Fig. 3 caption] The caption shows numerical symbols but does not specify the number of lattice sites or the simulation time for the splitting-probability data. For reproducibility, the simulation parameters used in Fig. 3 should be stated in the caption or in the text.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: Eqs. (4)-(5) are not fitted to their own outputs; the main caveats are an unproved N>1 Ray-Knight extension and an asserted sequential/simultaneous equivalence, which are rigor gaps rather than definitional circularity.
full rationale
The derivation chain is not circular in the prohibited sense. phi is a model parameter, and the effective-phi mapping for saturating SIRWs comes from Tóth's independent 1996 theory (ref. [7]); no parameter is fitted to the N-particle splitting probabilities or persistence exponents. The N-particle local-time representation (SM Eqs. (2.5)-(2.6)) extends Tóth's N=1 Ray-Knight theorem, and the SM is transparent that this is a supposition: "We first suppose that the Pólya urn scheme can still be used" (SM §2.1.1) and "The rigorous proof of this convergence in law is given in [1] for N=1" (SM §2.1.3). For mixed-absorption events, SM §2.2.1 explicitly says the inhomogeneous local-time process is unsolved ("we do not know how to solve this process conditioned on absorption at 0") and that protocol invariance "should not change the description"; the simultaneous-start claim therefore rests on an unproved equivalence, and the simultaneous prediction is the sequential computation transferred by that assertion. This is a gap in proof, not a self-definitional reduction, because the paper does not define the simultaneous quantity as the sequential one. The persistence exponents are obtained from the derived splitting probabilities through the standard scaling relation of Refs. [34,35], with single-particle inputs (q_-, phi/2) taken from published, independently derived works (including same-group papers [12,29]); these inputs are not the target N-particle results and are externally checkable. Numerical checks (including power-law tail fits by MLE with bootstrap uncertainties) are genuine tests rather than fitting of the claimed formulas. The score is not 0 only because of the heavy reliance on same-group single-particle results and the acknowledged conjectural N>1 and protocol-invariance steps; these affect rigor but do not constitute circular reasoning.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (7)
- standard math Tóth's single-walker Ray-Knight limit: for SATW_phi, rescaled edge local times converge to BESQ^{2phi} (left) and tildeBESQ^{2-2phi} (right) squared Bessel processes.
- ad hoc to paper The Pólya-urn representation extends to N walkers by adding +N to the blue-ball recurrence (2.2) and treating each urn as blind to which particle draws.
- ad hoc to paper Simultaneous and sequential launching protocols give the same local-time law for SATW_phi, including events with absorptions at both walls.
- standard math Additivity of squared Bessel processes: BESQ^{d1}_{a1}+BESQ^{d2}_{a2} = BESQ^{d1+d2}_{a1+a2} in law.
- standard math The small-x0 asymptotics of splitting probabilities is related to persistence exponents by Q_{k,N}(x0) ∝ x0^{d_w theta_{k,N}}.
- standard math SATW_phi has walk dimension d_w=2.
- ad hoc to paper For generic SIRWs, the last surviving walker spends negligible time in the region visited by earlier walkers, so its survival tail is the single-walker one.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Exact collective first-passage statistics of N trail-interacting walkers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U2DA3JPL
@misc{pith2026260713213,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Exact collective first-passage statistics of N trail-interacting walkers},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U2DA3JPL}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13213}
}
abstract
Memory encoded in the environment mediates interactions between active agents, from trail-following organisms to synthetic active matter depositing persistent tracks. Although such memory is known to strongly affect transport, its consequences for collective first-passage phenomena remain largely unexplored. Here we study $N$ one-dimensional random walkers interacting through a shared trail field. We characterize the $k^{\rm th}$ (among $N$) arrival time at a fixed target, and the probability that exactly $k$ walkers in $[0,1]$ reach one boundary before the other. For the broad class of self-interacting walkers with a saturating response to the trail, we derive exact expressions for the corresponding persistence exponents and splitting probabilities. Strikingly, despite the strong history-dependent correlations generated by the common environment, splitting probabilities are exactly identical whether walkers explore simultaneously or one after another. This invariance breaks down for nonsaturating trail interactions. Our results follow from an exact representation of the collective trail field and establish a framework for first-passage phenomena in systems coupled through persistent environmental memory.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
H¨ olldobler and E
B. H¨ olldobler and E. O. Wilson,The Ants(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1990)
1990
-
[2]
Dussutour, V
A. Dussutour, V. Fourcassi´ e, D. Helbing, and J.-L. Deneubourg, Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions, Nature428, 70–73 (2004)
2004
-
[3]
E. D. Morgan, Trail pheromones of ants., Physiological Entomology34, 1 (2009)
2009
-
[4]
J. M. Chalissery, A. Renyard, R. Gries, D. Hoefele, S. K. Alamsetti, and G. Gries, Ants sense, and follow, trail pheromones of ant community members, Insects10 (2019)
2019
-
[5]
D. J. Amit, G. Parisi, and L. Peliti, Asymptotic behavior of the” true” self-avoiding walk, Physical Review B27, 1635 (1983)
1983
-
[7]
T´ oth, Generalized ray-knight theory and limit theo- rems for self-interacting random walks on z, The Annals of Probability24, 1324 (1996)
B. T´ oth, Generalized ray-knight theory and limit theo- rems for self-interacting random walks on z, The Annals of Probability24, 1324 (1996)
1996
-
[8]
T´ oth and W
B. T´ oth and W. Werner, The true self-repelling motion, Probability Theory and Related Fields111, 375–452 (1998)
1998
-
[9]
T´ oth and W
B. T´ oth and W. Werner, Hydrodynamic equation for a deposition model, inIn and Out of Equilibrium (Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2002) p. 227–248
2002
Show all 57 references
-
[10]
Dumaz and B
L. Dumaz and B. T´ oth, Marginal densities of the “true” self-repelling motion, Stochastic Processes and their Ap- plications123, 1454–1471 (2013)
2013
-
[13]
Marˆ ech´ e, True self-repelling motion above a general barrier (2026)
L. Marˆ ech´ e, True self-repelling motion above a general barrier (2026)
2026
-
[14]
Coghi and J
F. Coghi and J. P. Garrahan, Self-interacting processes via Doob conditioning, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 103202 (2025)
2025
-
[15]
Romano and A
J. Romano and A. Gambassi, Anomalous diffusion and run-and-tumble motion of a chemotactic particle in low dimensions, Physical Review Letters136, 10.1103/zn4t- gv6y (2026)
2026 doi
-
[16]
A. C. Maggs, Non-reversible monte carlo: An example of “true” self-repelling motion, Europhysics Letters147, 6 21001 (2024)
2024
-
[17]
J. G. Foster, P. Grassberger, and M. Paczuski, Rein- forced walks in two and three dimensions, New Journal of Physics11, 023009 (2009)
2009
-
[20]
Pineau, S
P. Pineau, S. Bell, R. Voituriez, and R. M. Adar, Collective dynamics of trail-interacting particles (2025), arXiv:2512.03950 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
2025
-
[21]
N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry. revised and enlarged ed (1992)
1992
-
[22]
B. D. Hughes,Random Walks and Random Environ- ments(Oxford University PressOxford, 1996)
1996
-
[23]
A. J. Bray, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Persistence and first-passage properties in non-equilibrium systems, Advances in Physics62, 225 (2013), 1304.1195 [cond- mat]
2013 arXiv
-
[24]
Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes(Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)
S. Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes(Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)
2001
-
[25]
Redner and P
S. Redner and P. L. Krapivsky, Capture of the lamb: Diffusing predators seeking a diffusing prey, American Journal of Physics67, 1277–1283 (1999)
1999
-
[26]
Biroli, S
M. Biroli, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, First-passage resetting gas, Europhysics Letters153, 31002 (2026)
2026
-
[27]
Grabsch, H
A. Grabsch, H. Moriya, K. Mallick, T. Sasamoto, and O. B´ enichou, Semi-infinite simple exclusion process: From current fluctuations to target survival, Physical Re- view Letters133, 117102 (2024)
2024
-
[28]
A site-reinforced variant of SIR Ws can also be defined, for which our results still hold
-
[29]
Barbier-Chebbah, O
A. Barbier-Chebbah, O. B´ enichou, and R. Voituriez, Self- interacting random walks: Aging, exploration, and first- passage times, Physical Review X12, 011052 (2022)
2022
-
[30]
Kosygina, T
E. Kosygina, T. Mountford, and J. Peterson, Conver- gence of random walks with Markovian cookie stacks to Brownian motion perturbed at extrema, Probability The- ory and Related Fields182, 189 (2022)
2022
-
[31]
Efron and R
B. Efron and R. Tibshirani,An Introduction to the Boot- strap(Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1994)
1994
-
[32]
Clauset, C
A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman, Power- law distributions in empirical data, SIAM Review51, 661–703 (2009)
2009
-
[33]
See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]
-
[34]
S. N. Majumdar, A. Rosso, and A. Zoia, Hitting proba- bility for anomalous diffusion processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 020602 (2010)
2010
-
[35]
Levernier, O
N. Levernier, O. B´ enichou, T. Gu´ erin, and R. Voituriez, Universal first-passage statistics in aging media, Phys. Rev. E98, 022125 (2018)
2018
-
[36]
W. Chen, A. Izzet, R. Zakine, E. Cl´ ement, E. Vanden- Eijnden, and J. Brujic, Evolving motility of active droplets is captured by a self-repelling random walk model, Physical Review Letters134, 10.1103/phys- revlett.134.018301 (2025)
2025 doi
-
[37]
Defined by a b = Γ(a+1) Γ(b+1)Γ(a−b+1)
-
[38]
G¨ oing-Jaeschke and M
A. G¨ oing-Jaeschke and M. Yor, A survey and some gen- eralizations of Bessel processes, Bernoulli9, 313 (2003)
2003
-
[39]
Revuz and M
D. Revuz and M. Yor,Continuous Martingales and Brow- nian Motion, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften, Vol. 293 (Springer-Verlag, 1991)
1991
-
[40]
the oriented edge(xk−1,xk)is crossed for the(m+ 1)th time
L. Chaumont, R. A. Doney, and Y. Hu, Upper and lower limits of doubly perturbed brownian motion, Annales de l’I.H.P. Probabilit´ es et statistiques36, 219 (2000). Supplementary materials - First-passage statistics and splitting probabilities of multiple trail-interacting walke...
2000
-
[41]
An urn contains balls of two types : red and blue
-
[42]
At each step, a ball is drawn at random, with the probability of selecting each color depending on the current composition of the urn through weight functions
-
[43]
To model our system, we associate each lattice sitel∈Zwith such an urn
After drawing a ball of a given color, one additional ball of the same color is added to the urn. To model our system, we associate each lattice sitel∈Zwith such an urn. Letf l (resp.g l) denote the weight functions for red (resp. blue) balls of urnl. We denote byρl t (resp.β ...
-
[44]
N−k+1of theNparticles are absorbed at 0
= (0,0) red and blue balls. Consider a RW(Xt)t∈N onZwhosenext move is determined by drawing a ballfrom the urn located at its current positionX t : ⋄Drawing a red ball corresponds to moving right ⋄Drawing a blue ball corresponds to moving left A diagram of this kind of urn is ...
-
[45]
⋄Model 2 : w(n) = 1− 1 n+ 2 soϕ= 1 + ln 2≃1.693 This is a attractive trail which reinforcement is decreasing with the number of depositions
We define the effective parameter ϕ=w(0) −1 + ∞∑ j=1 ( w(2j)−1−w(2j−1) −1) .(2.29) We consider the following four cases : ⋄Model 1 : w(n) = { 2ifn≤1 1else soϕ= 1 This correspond to a repulsive trail which effect is saturating after 2 depositions. ⋄Model 2 : w(n) = 1− 1 n+ 2 so...
2000
-
[46]
Power-law behavior typically holds only in the tail of the distribution, above some thresholdtcut
-
[47]
The two issues are dealt following the rigorous framework established by [14] combined with boots- traping methods with following the framework of [15]
The uncertainty in bothtcut andαmust be properly quantified. The two issues are dealt following the rigorous framework established by [14] combined with boots- traping methods with following the framework of [15]. A.1 The discrete power-law distribution For discrete integer da...
-
[48]
B.Tóth, « Generalized Ray-Knight Theory and Limit Theorems for Self-Interacting Random Walks on Z », The Annals of Probability24, 1324-1367 (1996)
1996
-
[49]
J.Brémont, L.Régnier, R.Voituriezet O.Bénichou, « Persistence Exponents of Self- Interacting Random Walks », Physical Review Letters134,10.1103/physrevlett.134.197103 (2025)
2025 doi
-
[50]
293, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Springer-Verlag, 1991)
D.Revuzet M.Yor,Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, t. 293, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Springer-Verlag, 1991)
1991
-
[51]
A.Göing-Jaeschkeet M.Yor, « A survey and some generalizations of Bessel processes », Ber- noulli9, 313-349 (2003)
2003
-
[52]
S.N.Majumdar,A.RossoetA.Zoia,« HittingProbabilityforAnomalousDiffusionProcesses », Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 020602 (2010)
2010
-
[53]
N.Levernier, O.Bénichou, T.Guérinet R.Voituriez, « Universal first-passage statistics in aging media », Phys. Rev. E98, 022125 (2018)
2018
-
[54]
J.Amit, G.Parisiet L.Peliti, « Asymptotic behavior of the" true" self-avoiding walk », Physical Review B27, 1635 (1983)
D. J.Amit, G.Parisiet L.Peliti, « Asymptotic behavior of the" true" self-avoiding walk », Physical Review B27, 1635 (1983)
1983
-
[55]
B.Toth, « The “True” Self-Avoiding Walk with Bond Repulsion onZ: Limit Theorems », The Annals of Probability23,10.1214/aop/1176987793(1995)
1995
-
[56]
B.Tóthet W.Werner, « The true self-repelling motion », Probability Theory and Related Fields111, 375-452 (1998)
1998
-
[57]
B.Tóthet W.Werner, « Hydrodynamic Equation for a Deposition Model », inIn and Out of Equilibrium(Birkhäuser Boston, 2002), p. 227-248
2002
-
[58]
L.Dumazet B.Tóth, « Marginal densities of the “true” self-repelling motion », Stochastic Pro- cesses and their Applications123, 1454-1471 (2013)
2013
-
[59]
J.Brémont, L.Régnier, A.Barbier–Chebbah, R.Voituriezet O.Bénichou, « Flips reveal the universal impact of memory on random explorations », Nature Communications17,10.1038/ s41467-025-67139-z(2025)
2025
-
[60]
L.Marêché,True self-repelling motion above a general barrier, 2026
2026
-
[61]
R.Shaliziet M
A.Clauset, C. R.Shaliziet M. E. J.Newman, « Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data », SIAM Review51, 661-703 (2009)
2009
-
[62]
B.Efronet R.Tibshirani,An Introduction to the Bootstrap(Chapman et Hall/CRC, mai 1994). 28
1994
Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.