Acceleration radiation and HBAR thermodynamics for atoms falling into a BTZ black hole: A CQM quantum-optics approach

A. Chakraborty; C. R. Ord\'o\~nez; G. Valdivia-Mera; H. E. Camblong; H. Wang; M. O. Scully

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 170 references

Acceleration radiation and HBAR thermodynamics for atoms falling into a BTZ black hole: A CQM quantum-optics approach

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Atoms falling freely into a BTZ black hole emit radiation with a Planck spectrum at the Hawking temperature, showing that lower-dimensional black holes support the same horizon-brightened acceleration radiation seen in higher dimensions.

desk verdict Serious BTZ extension of HBAR with real calculational content, but the central detailed-balance step drops the ingoing half of the physical Boulware modes, injecting a non-thermal 1/q term that breaks Eq. (96). read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14281 v1 pith:ZRNPDFAN submitted 2026-07-15 gr-qc hep-th

H. E. Camblong , A. Chakraborty , C. R. Ordóñez , M. O. Scully , G. Valdivia-Mera , H. Wang This is my paper

classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C5781T20 PACS 04.70.Dy04.62.+v

keywords BTZblackholeaccelerationradiationHawkingtemperatureconformalquantummechanicsBoulwarevacuumhorizon-brighteneddetailedbalanceHBARentropy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the three-dimensional BTZ black hole, despite its topological and locally AdS nature, produces no obstruction to horizon-brightened acceleration radiation. Freely falling two-level atoms interacting with a Boulware-like vacuum emit scalar quanta with a Planckian spectrum at the BTZ Hawking temperature, with emission-to-absorption ratio given by a thermal Boltzmann factor. The derivation works through near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics, which the paper shows governs both field modes and geodesics in this lower-dimensional setting. If correct, the result extends the known higher-dimensional HBAR thermodynamics to (2+1) dimensions, including an HBAR entropy flux that mimics the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy with the standard 1/4 coefficient. A sympathetic reader would care because it reinforces the universality of near-horizon conformal behavior as the common origin of black hole and acceleration-radiation thermodynamics.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the near-horizon reduction of the Klein-Gordon equation to conformal quantum mechanics (CQM), specifically an inverse-square-potential Hamiltonian with SO(2,1) symmetry. The field modes become x^{±iΘ} with Θ = ω̃/(2κ), where ω̃ = ω - mΩ_H is the corotating frequency, and the same logarithmic phase appears in the geodesic time coordinate t ∼ -(1/2κ) ln x. Substituting these modes into the atom-field transition amplitudes yields the emission-rate integral whose modulus squared gives the Planck factor, with the Boulware vacuum implemented through brick-wall boundary conditions at the horizon.

What would settle it

A direct calculation that relaxes the brick-wall boundary condition, or includes modes with ω̃ < 0, should show whether the emission-to-absorption ratio remains e^{-2πω̃/κ} or becomes modified. Concretely, one could evaluate the transition amplitude (93) with the full hypergeometric mode (81) without imposing the near-horizon Dirichlet condition, and check whether the Planck distribution survives, or whether superradiant amplification changes the ratio. If the ratio deviates from the thermal Boltzmann factor in any such calculation, the central claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a scalar field in a Boulware-like vacuum near a nonextremal BTZ black hole, probed by atoms in free fall, radiates with an exactly Planckian distribution at the Hawking temperature T_H = κ/(2π), where κ is the surface gravity. The emission and absorption rates satisfy R_{e,s}/R_{a,s} = e^{-2πω̃/κ}, with ω̃ the corotating frequency, and the steady-state reduced density matrix of the field is a thermal state at T_H. The paper further claims that the entropy flux of this radiation field obeys Ṡ_P = (1/4G)|Ȧ_P|, the same area-law form as the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, with the horizon 'area' being the BTZ circumference. This is presented as the first full realization

Load-bearing premise

The derivation requires that a Boulware-like vacuum exists, meaning the brick-wall boundary conditions at the horizon select only positive corotating frequencies ω̃ > 0 and that all superradiant modes are absent; if this vacuum construction fails, the positive-frequency mode set used in Eq. (92) would not describe the actual state and the Planckian emission would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the central claim is correct, the Hawking temperature of a BTZ black hole is experimentally accessible in principle through the acceleration-radiation spectrum of infalling atoms rather than through the black hole's own thermal emission.
The detailed-balance ratio and the steady-state density matrix establish that the radiation field equilibrates to a thermal state at the Hawking temperature, giving a concrete microscopic model of black hole thermality in a lower-dimensional setting.
The HBAR entropy-area relation Ṡ_P = (1/4G)|Ȧ_P| implies that the entropy carried by the acceleration radiation flux is quantitatively identical to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy change, strengthening the correspondence between radiation-field thermodynamics and black hole thermodynamics.
The result suggests that the universality of near-horizon CQM, already known for Schwarzschild-like and Kerr black holes in higher dimensions, extends to the rotating BTZ geometry, so that the same conformal mechanism governs all these cases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the paper's claim that no superradiant modes survive in the BTZ Boulware vacuum is correct, it implies that rotating BTZ black holes, unlike Kerr black holes, admit a globally well-defined Boulware state; this distinction could be probed by studying scattering of low-frequency modes with ω̃ < 0 in the exact hypergeometric solution.
The derivation's independence from the atom's initial conditions (the constants k, C, α cancel) suggests a kind of universality: the Planck spectrum may survive for a broad class of detector trajectories that share the near-horizon logarithmic time dependence, not just the specific free-fall geodesics considered here.
The paper's framework could be extended to testable analog systems: hydrodynamic or optical analogues of the BTZ geometry (already proposed in the literature) might exhibit a measurable radiation spectrum with the temperature set by the analogue surface gravity, providing a tabletop check of the HBAR mechanism.
One could test the conformal origin of the Planck factor by computing the emission rate in a non-conformal near-horizon approximation (e.g., keeping subleading terms in the lapse function) and checking whether the thermal ratio remains exact or acquires corrections; this would isolate the role of scale invariance in the result.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a serious, mostly careful extension of the HBAR/CQM program to 2+1 BTZ, and the geometry, geodesics, and exact hypergeometric mode solution in Secs. II–IV and App. C are real work. But I think the central thermal claim is not supported as written, because the transition-amplitude calculation in Sec. V C uses only the outgoing CQM mode, while the physical Boulware modes constructed in App. C are standing waves (Eq. C14). The ingoing half of that standing wave does not vanish on the infalling geodesic; it produces a constant phase, and its integral is ~1/q rather than exponentially suppressed. That term enters both the emission and absorption amplitudes with different relative phases, so the ratio in Eq. (96) is not the clean Boltzmann factor e^{-2πω~/κ}; it depends on q and the brick-wall phase γ. The paper's statement that ingoing waves 'do not contribute' is only true for the Planckian part; they contribute a non-thermal background that breaks detailed balance. Unless there is a suppression mechanism I am missing, this is a load-bearing inconsistency between Sec. V C and App. C, not a minor technicality.

What is genuinely new: the BTZ-specific hypergeometric solution, the near-horizon CQM reduction, the explicit geodesic expansions, and the no-superradiance discussion. Those parts look careful and will be useful. The entropy relation (Eq. 100) is asserted rather than derived here, as the reader noted; that is a secondary concern.

I would send this to peer review, not desk-reject — the flaw is subtle and the fix might be straightforward, e.g., compute with the full standing-wave mode or argue why the ingoing component is suppressed in the relevant limit. But I would not accept the current version, and I would not cite the thermal result until the mode question is resolved.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper extends the 'horizon-brightened acceleration radiation' (HBAR) program to the (2+1)-dimensional BTZ black hole. It derives near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics (CQM) modes and geodesics, computes emission and absorption rates for atoms freely falling into the black hole in a Boulware-like vacuum, and claims that the detailed-balance ratio gives a Planck spectrum at the Hawking temperature T_H = κ/(2π). It further asserts an HBAR entropy S_P whose flux obeys dS_P/dt = (1/(4G))|dA_P/dt|, in analogy with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. The paper contains an exact hypergeometric solution of the scalar field modes, a brick-wall construction of the Boulware vacuum, and a discussion of superradiance.

Significance. If the central result were fully established, the paper would provide an important universality check: HBAR thermodynamics would work in a lower-dimensional, topologically nontrivial black hole spacetime, with the same near-horizon CQM machinery as in higher dimensions. The paper is careful in deriving the BTZ geometry, geodesics, and exact scalar modes, and it correctly identifies the standard Unruh-type integral that produces a Planck factor from the logarithmic phase. However, the derivation as written omits the ingoing component of the physical Boulware modes, and this omission directly affects the claimed detailed-balance ratio. The HBAR entropy relation is also asserted rather than derived. These issues put the main conclusion in question.

major comments (3)

[Sec. V C vs. App. C] Equation (92) uses only the outgoing CQM mode Φ_+ in the transition amplitude. However, the physical Boulware modes constructed in App. C, Eq. (C14), are standing waves of the form e^{-iω̃t} e^{imφ̃}(e^{iγ} x^{iΘ} + e^{-iγ} x^{-iΘ}). Along the infalling geodesic (86)-(87), with t = -(1/2κ) ln x - Cx, the emission amplitude contains not only the thermal factor x^{-2iΘ} e^{-iqx} but also a non-oscillatory term e^{-iqx}. The latter contributes |∫ e^{-iqx} dx|^2 ~ 1/q^2, and its relative phase differs between emission and absorption. Thus R_{e,s}/R_{a,s} does not reduce to e^{-2πω̃/κ} unless the constant term cancels, which is not shown. The statement after Eq. (95) that 'the ingoing waves do not contribute, due to the cancellation of the logarithmic phases yielding σ=0' is incorrect: σ=0 means the log phase is removed, not that the Fourier integral vanishes. The calculation must be redone w
[Sec. VI, Eqs. (100)-(101)] The central HBAR entropy relation, dS_P/dt = (1/(4G))|dA_P/dt|, is asserted with the comment 'the entropy works in exactly the same manner' and a reference to earlier work. This is not a derivation. The steady-state density matrix (99) depends on the detailed-balance ratio (96), and if that ratio is modified by the non-Planckian term discussed in the previous comment, the entropy rate will not necessarily satisfy (100). Even assuming (96), the paper should show explicitly how the von Neumann entropy rate for the BTZ scalar field leads to the 1/(4G) prefactor. As written, the main title claim about HBAR thermodynamics rests on an unproved assertion.
[Sec. IV B and App. D] The condition ω̃ = ω - mΩ_H > 0, which is essential for the definition of positive-frequency modes (Eq. (72)) and for the Boulware vacuum, is imported from Refs. [109] and [111] rather than proved. The Wronskian analysis in App. D3 derives superradiance formulas assuming the sign of ω̃; it does not itself establish that the brick-wall boundary conditions (C15)-(C18) enforce ω̃ > 0. For a self-contained derivation, the paper should either prove this condition from the boundary-value problem or explicitly state it as an external assumption. This is load-bearing because if superradiant modes existed, the vacuum and the detailed-balance calculation would change.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. V C, Eq. (94)] The approximation ν ≫ ω̃ is used to replace q with kν. This should be stated more precisely, including the conditions under which the subleading terms in q are negligible.
[Sec. II B] The phrase 'as in this review article' appears in a regular research article; it should be 'in this article'.
[App. C, Eqs. (C17)-(C18)] The sign conventions for the phase γ entering the brick-wall conditions should be checked for consistency with Eq. (C14). A mismatch in signs could affect the allowed frequency spectrum.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

BTZ radiation temperature is independently derived; self-citations carry the Boulware-generality and HBAR-entropy claims.

self citation load bearing [Sec. V A, Boulware-vacuum paragraph]
"For the purpose of deriving HBAR properties, any Boulware-like state suffices, and we use this construction in this section. (All Boulware-like states yield the same result for the relevant transition probabilities; see discussion in Ref. [48].)"

The paper's abstract claims emission from atoms 'in a Boulware-like vacuum', but the actual calculation uses one particular mode choice. The step from that choice to the claimed universality is not proved; it is deferred to Ref. [48], which is by the same authors. The citation is load-bearing because without it the computation in Eqs. (92)-(96) need not describe the physical Boulware state, especially since App. C Eq. (C14) defines the physical mode as a standing wave while Eq. (92) keeps only the outgoing component.
self citation load bearing [Sec. VI (Summary), after Eq. (100)]
"As the relevant near-horizon and HBAR physics in BTZ geometry was shown in Sec. V to be identical to that of its higher-dimensional counterparts, the entropy works in exactly the same manner."

No BTZ von Neumann entropy calculation is presented; the S_P = (1/4G)|A_dot_P| relation is asserted to follow by identity with higher-dimensional cases and is eventually deferred to Refs. [27,49] by the same group. The 1/4 prefactor is therefore imported from prior work rather than derived here. This makes the paper's HBAR-entropy result a cited input rather than an independent output.

full rationale

Central radiation claim: the Boltzmann ratio (96) is not fitted. kappa is the BTZ surface gravity (27); the near-horizon CQM mode (73) and infall geodesic (86) produce the logarithmic phase x^{-i omega~ / kappa} in Eq. (93); the integral yields e^{-2 pi omega~ / kappa}. The constants k, C, alpha cancel, so no parameter is tuned. Thus the Planckian detailed-balance result is self-contained. The circularity burden is limited to two same-author imports: (i) the assertion that all Boulware-like states give the same transition probabilities, justified only by Ref. [48]; and (ii) the HBAR entropy (100), carried over from Refs. [27,49] by the claim that BTZ physics is identical to higher-dimensional physics. Both support secondary/generality or entropy claims; the central temperature result remains independent. The standing-wave mismatch flagged by the skeptic (Eq. 92 uses only Phi_+ while App. C Eq. C14 defines Phi ~ e^{i gamma} Phi_+ + e^{-i gamma} Phi_-) is a correctness/consistency concern, not a circularity, so it is noted but not scored.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central thermal result rests on standard QFT-in-curved-spacetime and near-horizon conformal techniques; no new entity or fitted constant is introduced. The main imported assumptions are the existence of a Boulware vacuum (with brick-wall boundary conditions) and, more importantly, the HBAR entropy law, which is not derived here but carried over from the authors' prior work.

free parameters (1)

brick-wall cutoff x
Regulator introduced in App. C (Eqs. C15-C18) to impose Dirichlet/Neumann boundary conditions defining the Boulware vacuum; the final emission/absorption rates are independent of it.

assumptions (6)

standard math Standard Fourier/Gamma integral ∫₀^∞ x^{-iσ}e^{-iqx} dx = q^{-1+iσ}Γ(1-iσ), with modulus squared = 2πσ/[q²(e^{2πσ}−1)].
Used to evaluate the emission/absorption amplitude integrals in Eqs. (93)-(94).
standard math The BTZ radial scalar equation is a hypergeometric equation; Kummer connection formulas and Gamma-function identities give the near-horizon mode form (C11)-(C14).
Basis for the exact/CQM modes in Sec. IV.C and App. C.
domain assumption The near-horizon geodesic expansion t ≃ −(1/2κ) ln x − Cx, τ ≃ −kx, φ~ ≃ αx (Eqs. B4, B12, B15) is valid to leading order for ingoing timelike geodesics.
Needed to substitute trajectories into the atom-field amplitude (Eq. 92); higher-order terms are dropped without error estimates.
domain assumption A Boulware-like vacuum exists for a scalar field in BTZ; this requires brick-wall boundary conditions enforcing ω~ = ω − mΩ_H > 0, i.e., no superradiance.
Boundary conditions (C15)-(C18) and the no-superradiance conclusion in App. D; existence is imported from Refs. [109,111].
domain assumption The atom-field system is described by first-order perturbation theory with a monopole coupling and by the Scully-Lamb master equation with random injection times, yielding a steady-state thermal density matrix.
Frames the detailed balance (96) and density matrix (99); established in Refs. [20,24,25,27].
ad hoc to paper HBAR entropy/thermodynamic correspondence (S_P ↔ S_BH, E_P ↔ M, J_P,z ↔ J) carries over to BTZ by universality of near-horizon physics.
Eqs. (100)-(101) are asserted rather than derived in this preprint; the paper's own text says 'the entropy works in exactly the same manner.'

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Acceleration radiation and HBAR thermodynamics for atoms falling into a BTZ black hole: A CQM quantum-optics approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZRNPDFAN

@misc{pith2026260714281,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Acceleration radiation and HBAR thermodynamics for atoms falling into a BTZ black hole: A CQM quantum-optics approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZRNPDFAN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14281}
}

abstract

Atoms falling freely into a Ba\~{n}ados-Teitelboim-Zanelli (BTZ) black hole in a Boulware-like vacuum are shown to emit radiation with a Planck spectrum at the Hawking temperature $T_{H}$. This leads to thermal Hawking-like radiation for a cloud of falling atoms prepared with random initial times. Moreover, the radiation is related to the relative equivalence principle, with the vacuum field modes accelerated with respect to the falling atom. The physics of the atom-field interactions is most easily described within a quantum optics approach, where each atom can be interpreted as a detector. Despite the topological nature of gravity in $(2+1)$ dimensions, the thermodynamic and radiation properties of BTZ black holes are still universally governed by the same near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics (CQM) applicable to higher-dimensional gravity. This universal conformal behavior is exhibited by all fields in the background of generic black holes, and generates an HBAR entropy $S_{\mathcal P}$ associated with the photon radiation field that mimics the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy $S_{\mathrm{BH}}=A/4$, proportional to the black-hole horizon area, and with the correct $1/4$ proportionality factor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14281 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[109]

Kenmoku, M

M. Kenmoku, M. Kuwata, and K. Shigemoto, Normal modes and the no zero mode theorem of scalar fields in BTZ black hole spacetime, Classical Quantum Gravity25, 145016 (2008)

2008
[111]

H. E. Camblong, L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, and C. A. Garc ´ ıa Canal, Dimensional transmu- tation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics: I. General theory, Ann. Phys. 55 (N.Y.)287, 14 (2001)

2001
[1]

Metric relations and locally diagonal metric From Eqs. (13)–(20), the following statements can be straightforwardly derived for the sector (t, ϕ): gtt =ξ (t) ·ξ (t) ̸= gtt −1 , g ˜t˜t =ξ (˜t) ·ξ (˜t) = D gϕϕ = g ˜t˜t −1 = gtt −1 ,(A1) whereD=g ttgϕϕ −(g tϕ)2; and for their relation to the radial sector, −gtt =−g ˜t˜t =g rr ,−g ˜t˜t = (grr)−1 =g rr .(A2) M...
[2]

II B, the structure of the BTZ spacetime involves two sets of surfaces that can be identified as critical boundaries

Structure of BTZ spacetime As summarized in Sec. II B, the structure of the BTZ spacetime involves two sets of surfaces that can be identified as critical boundaries. This can be understood from the properties of the Killing vectorsξ (t) andξ (˜t) in Eqs. (14) and (19), and their relation to the metric (13). First, starting sufficiently far away from the ...
[3]

(84) and (85) can be extended to their next orders by considering the expansions of ˇe,f(r), and r, so thatdr/dτincludes the first orderO(x)

Radial geodesics For the radial geodesics (40), the leading ingoing near-horizon expressions of Eqs. (84) and (85) can be extended to their next orders by considering the expansions of ˇe,f(r), and r, so thatdr/dτincludes the first orderO(x). Specifically, from Eqs. (33) and (34), ˇe (H) ∼˜e−(ϖ +)′ℓx(B1) whereϖ +(r+) = ΩH and (ϖ+)′ =dϖ +(r)/dr r+ =−J/r 3 ...
[4]

(36), the next order in the lapse function is needed

Coordinate-time geodesics For the coordinate-time geodesics, starting from Eq. (36), the next order in the lapse function is needed. Using Eqs. (60)–(61), f(r) (H) ∼f ′ + x+ 1 2 f ′′ +x2 +O(x 3) =f ′ + x 1 + 1 2 f ′′ + f ′ + x+O(x 2) ,(B7) so that, withκ=f ′ +/2 and Eq. (B1), dt dτ (H) ∼ ˇe 2κx 1− 1 2 f ′′ + f ′ + x (H) ∼ ˜e 2κx 1− (ϖ+)′ℓx ˜e 1− 1 2 f ′′ ...
[5]

This precisely defines a constantαin Eq

Azimuthal geodesics Finally, for the azimuthal geodesics, we can use the black hole corotating frame for a quick, direct evaluation of ˜ϕ. This precisely defines a constantαin Eq. (87), which is to be 37 used in the transition integrals of Eq. (92). Specifically, from the geodesic Eq. (37) for ˜ϕ combined with the radial geodesic (40): − d ˜ϕ dx =− d ˜ϕ/d...
[6]

This equation has three regular singular points: (i) the inner horizonr=r −; (ii) the outer horizonr=r +; and (iii) spatial infinityr=∞

General form of the exact solution The differential equation (48) for a scalar field in the BTZ geometry is set up in terms of the radial functionR mω(r). This equation has three regular singular points: (i) the inner horizonr=r −; (ii) the outer horizonr=r +; and (iii) spatial infinityr=∞. Therefore, there exists a transformation that converts it into a ...

Show all 170 references

[7]

Solutions adapted to boundary conditions We will briefly analyze next the behaviors of the two linearly independent solutions about each of the two singular points most relevant for this article: corresponding to spatial infinity and the outer horizon. 40 a. Asymptotic behavio...
[8]

Superradiance concepts Historically, superradiance can be traced back to Klein’s paradox [147] in 1929, the analy- sis of radiation amplification due to the coherence of emitters [148] in 1954, and Zel’dovich’s proof in the 1970s that radiation scattering off spinning surfaces...

1929
[9]

(81) and (C14)]

Superradiance suppression in BTZ black hole In the analysis of the exact solution to BTZ spacetime, the physical solution involves field modes that vanish both at spatial infinity and in the near-horizon region [see Eqs. (81) and (C14)]. Furthermore, as demonstrated in [109], ...
[10]

Superradiance framework To analyze this phenomenon in the rotating BTZ black hole geometry, we follow the general method presented in [158, 159], adapted to the BTZ spacetime. In this framework, the equation of motion for the radial functionRmω(r) is usually written in terms o...
[11]

S. W. Hawking, Black holes and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D13, 191 (1976)

1976
[12]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space(Cambridge University Press, 1984)

1984
[13]

R. M. Wald, The thermodynamics of black holes, Living Rev. Rel.4, 6 (2001)

2001
[14]

Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights, Rep

T. Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights, Rep. Prog. Phys.73, 046901 (2010)

2010
[15]

Carlip, Black hole thermodynamics, Int

S. Carlip, Black hole thermodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1430023 (2014)

2014
[16]

Witten, Introduction to black hole thermodynamics, arXiv:2412.16795 (2024)

E. Witten, Introduction to black hole thermodynamics, arXiv:2412.16795 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[17]

J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law, Lett. Nuovo Cimento4, 737 (1972)

1972
[18]

J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

1973
[19]

J. D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics, Phys. 49 Rev. D9, 3292 (1974)

1974
[20]

S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 1344 (1971)

1971
[21]

J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

1973
[22]

S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature248, 30 (1974)

1974
[23]

S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

1975
[24]

Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity(Addison-Wesley, 2003)

S. Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity(Addison-Wesley, 2003)

2003
[25]

Kiefer,Quantum Gravity, 3rd ed

C. Kiefer,Quantum Gravity, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012)

2012
[26]

S. A. Fulling, Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time, Phys. Rev. D7, 2850 (1973)

1973
[27]

P. C. W. Davies, Scalar production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics, J. Phys. A8, 609 (1975)

1975
[28]

W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

1976
[29]

P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling, and W. G. Unruh, Energy-momentum tensor near an evapo- rating black hole, Phys. Rev. D13, 2720 (1976)

1976
[30]

M. O. Scully, S. Fulling, D. M. Lee, D. N. Page, W. P. Schleich, and A. A. Svidzinsky, Quantum optics approach to radiation from atoms falling into a black hole, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 8131 (2018)

2018
[31]

D. G. Boulware, Quantum field theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler spaces, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1404 (1975)

1975
[32]

H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, and Ord´ o˜ nez, Near-horizon aspects of acceleration radia- tion by free fall of an atom into a black hole, Phys. Rev. D102, 085010 (2020)

2020
[33]

J. S. Ben-Benjaminet al., Unruh acceleration radiation revisited, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, 1941005 (2019)

2019
[34]

M. O. Scully, V. V. Kocharovsky, A. Belyanin, E. Fry, and F. Capasso, Enhancing acceleration radiation from ground state-atoms via cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 243004 (2003)

2003
[35]

Belyanin, V

A. Belyanin, V. V. Kocharovsky, F. Capasso, E. Fry, M. S. Zubairy, and M. O. Scully, Quantum electrodynamics of accelerated atoms in free space and in cavities, Phys. Rev. A 50 74, 023807 (2006)

2006
[36]

Azizi, H

A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, and M. O. Scully, Quantum optics meets black hole thermodynamics via conformal quantum mechanics. I. Master equation for acceleration radiation, Phys. Rev. D104, 084086 (2021)

2021
[37]

Azizi, H

A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, and M. O. Scully, Quantum optics meets black hole thermodynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: II. Thermodynamics of acceleration radiation, Phys. Rev. D104, 084085 (2021)

2021
[38]

Carlip, Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole, Phys

S. Carlip, Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole, Phys. Rev. D51, 632 (1995)

1995
[39]

Carlip, Statistical mechanics of the three-dimensional Euclidean black hole, Phys

S. Carlip, Statistical mechanics of the three-dimensional Euclidean black hole, Phys. Rev. D 55, 878 (1997)

1997
[40]

Strominger, Black hole entropy from near-horizon microstates, J

A. Strominger, Black hole entropy from near-horizon microstates, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1998) 009

1998
[41]

Carlip, Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension, Phys

S. Carlip, Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828 (1999)

1999
[42]

Carlip, Entropy from conformal field theory at Killing horizons, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, 3327 (1999)

S. Carlip, Entropy from conformal field theory at Killing horizons, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, 3327 (1999)

1999
[43]

de Alfaro, S

V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, and G. Furlan, Conformal invariance in quantum mechanics, Nuovo Cimento A34, 569 (1976)

1976
[44]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Renormalization in conformal quantum mechanics, Phys. Lett. A345, 22 (2005)

2005
[45]

Srinivasan and T

K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Particle production and complex path analysis, Phys. Rev. D60, 24007 (1999)

1999
[46]

Padmanabhan, Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons, Phys

T. Padmanabhan, Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons, Phys. Rep.406, 49 (2005)

2005
[47]

Birmingham, K

D. Birmingham, K. S. Gupta, and S. Sen, Near-horizon conformal structure of black holes, Physics Letters B505, 191 (2001)

2001
[48]

T. R. Govindarajan, V. Suneeta, and S. Vaidya, Horizon states for AdS black holes, Nucl. Phys. B583, 291 (2000)

2000
[49]

Moretti and N

V. Moretti and N. Pinamonti, Aspects of hidden and manifestSL(2,R) symmetry in 2D near-horizon black-hole backgrounds, Nucl. Phys. B647, 131 (2002)

2002
[50]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Black hole thermodynamics from near-horizon conformal 51 quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D71, 104029 (2005)

2005
[51]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Semiclassical methods in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D71, 124040 (2005)

2005
[52]

Agullo, J

I. Agullo, J. Navarro-Salas, G. J. Olmo, and L. Parker, Hawking radiation by Kerr black holes and conformal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 211305 (2010)

2010
[53]

’t Hooft, On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft, On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nucl. Phys. B256, 727 (1985)

1985
[54]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Conformal enhancement of holographic scaling in black hole thermodynamics: A near-horizon heat-kernel framework, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 099

2007
[55]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Conformal tightness of holographic scaling in black hole thermodynamics, Classical Quantum Gravity30, 175007 (2013)

2013
[56]

Myers and M

R. Myers and M. J. Perry, Black holes in higher dimensional space-times, Ann. Phys. (NY) 172, 304 (1986)

1986
[57]

Emparan and H

R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, Black Holes in higher dimensions, Living Rev. Relativity11, 6 (2008)

2008
[58]

Azizi, H

A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, and M. O. Scully, Acceleration radiation of an atom freely falling into a Kerr black hole and near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D104, 065006 (2021)

2021
[59]

C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, A. Chakraborty, H. E. Camblong, M. O. Scully, and W. G. Unruh, Quan- tum aspects of spacetime: a quantum optics view of acceleration radiation and black holes, Philosophical Magazine, 1 (2026)

2026
[60]

Ba˜ nados, C

M. Ba˜ nados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Black hole in three-dimensional spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1849 (1992)

1992
[61]

Ba˜ nados, M

M. Ba˜ nados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the 2 + 1 black hole, Phys. Rev. D48, 1506 (1993)

1993
[62]

Arnowitt, S

R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Dynamical structure and definition of energy in general relativity, Phys. Rev.116, 1322 (1959)

1959
[63]

Arnowitt, S

R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Republication of: The dynamics of general rela- tivity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.401997 (2008)

2008
[64]

Carlip, The (2 + 1)-dimensional black hole, Classical Quantum Gravity12, 2853 (1995)

S. Carlip, The (2 + 1)-dimensional black hole, Classical Quantum Gravity12, 2853 (1995)

1995
[65]

Landau and E

L. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields, 4th ed. (Pergamon Press, 52 Oxford, 1975)

1975
[66]

C. W. Misner, K. S.Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation(W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco,1973)

1973
[67]

Frolov and I

V. Frolov and I. Novikov,Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Developments (Vol. 96, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

2012
[68]

Carlip,Quantum Gravity in2 + 1Dimensions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998)

S. Carlip,Quantum Gravity in2 + 1Dimensions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998)

1998
[69]

Carlip, Quantum gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions: The case of a closed universe, Living Rev

S. Carlip, Quantum gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions: The case of a closed universe, Living Rev. Relativ.8, 1 (2005)

2005
[70]

Carlip,Quantum Gravity in2 + 1Dimensions, in: Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2nd ed (Elsevier, 2024)

S. Carlip,Quantum Gravity in2 + 1Dimensions, in: Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2nd ed (Elsevier, 2024)

2024
[71]

S. Hyun, G. H. Lee, and J. H. Yee, Hawking radiation from a (2 + 1)-dimensional black hole, Phys. Lett. B322, 182 (1994)

1994
[72]

Ichinose and Y

I. Ichinose and Y. Satoh, Entropies of scalar fields on three dimensional black holes, Nucl. Phys. B447, 340 (1995)

1995
[73]

Englert and B

F. Englert and B. Reznik, Entropy generation by tunneling in (2 + 1) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2692 (1994)

1994
[74]

Carlip and C

S. Carlip and C. Teitelboim, Aspects of black hole quantum mechanics and thermodynamics in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D51, 622 (1995)

1995
[75]

J. D. Brown, J. Creighton, and R. B. Mann, Temperature, energy, and heat capacity of asymptotically anti–de Sitter black holes, Phys. Rev. D50, 6394 (1994)

1994
[76]

Carlip, J

S. Carlip, J. Gegenberg, and R. Mann, Black holes in three-dimensional topological gravity, Phys. Rev. D51, 6854 (1995)

1995
[77]

Emparan and I

R. Emparan and I. Sachs, Quantization of AdS3 black holes in external fields: Semiclassical results from pure gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.812408 (1998)

1998
[78]

Medved, Radiation via tunnelling in the charged BTZ black hole, Classical Quantum Gravity19, 589 (2002)

A. Medved, Radiation via tunnelling in the charged BTZ black hole, Classical Quantum Gravity19, 589 (2002)

2002
[79]

Jiang, S.-Q

Q.-Q. Jiang, S.-Q. Wu, and X. Cai, Hawking radiation from (2 + 1)-dimensional BTZ black holes, Phys. Lett. B651, 58 (2007)

2007
[80]

R. Li, S. Li, and J.-R. Ren, Hawking radiation of the fermionic field and anomaly in (2 + 1)- dimensional black holes, Classical Quantum Gravity27, 155011 (2010). 53

2010
[81]

J. L. Cardy, Operator content of two-dimensional conformal invariant theory, Nucl. Phys. B 270, 186 (1986)

1986
[82]

H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, J. L. Cardy, and M. P. Nightingale, Conformal invariance, the central charge, and universal finite-size amplitudes at criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 742 (1986)

1986
[83]

Carlip, What we don’t know about BTZ black hole entropy, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 3609 (1998)

S. Carlip, What we don’t know about BTZ black hole entropy, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 3609 (1998)

1998
[84]

Kraus, Lectures on black holes and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence, inSupersymmetric Mechanics, Vol

P. Kraus, Lectures on black holes and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence, inSupersymmetric Mechanics, Vol. 3,Attractions and Black holes in Supersymmetric Gravity, Lecture Notes in Physics 755, ed. by S. Bellucci (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 2008), p. 193

2008
[85]

Carlip, Conformal field theory, (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity, and the BTZ black hole, Phys

S. Carlip, Conformal field theory, (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity, and the BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev.22, R85 (2005)

2005
[86]

J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: An example from three-dimensional gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.104, 207 (1986)

1986
[87]

Regge and C

T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)88, 286 (1974)

1974
[88]

Deser, R

S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and G. ’t Hooft, Three-dimensional Einstein gravity: Dynamics of flat space, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)152, 220 (1984)

1984
[89]

Deser and R

S. Deser and R. Jackiw, Three-dimensional cosmological gravity: Dynamics of constant cur- vature, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)153, 405 (1984)

1984
[90]

Ach´ ucarro and P

A. Ach´ ucarro and P. Townsend, A Chern-Simons action for three-dimensional anti-de Sitter supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B180, 89 (1986)

1986
[91]

Deser and R

S. Deser and R. Jackiw, Classical and quantum scattering on a cone, Comm. Math. Phys. 118, 495 (1988)

1988
[92]

’t Hooft, Non-perturbative 2 particle scattering amplitudes in 2 + 1 dimensional quantum gravity, Commun

G. ’t Hooft, Non-perturbative 2 particle scattering amplitudes in 2 + 1 dimensional quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.117, 685 (1988)

1988
[93]

Witten, 2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system, Nucl

E. Witten, 2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system, Nucl. Phys. B311, 46 (1988)

1988
[94]

Witten, Topology-changing amplitudes in 2 + 1 dimensional gravity, Nucl

E. Witten, Topology-changing amplitudes in 2 + 1 dimensional gravity, Nucl. Phys. B323, 113 (1989)

1989
[95]

J. D. Barrow, A. B. Burd, and D. Lancaster, Three-dimensional classical spacetimes, Classical 54 Quantum Gravity3, 551 (1986)

1986
[96]

N. J. Cornish and N. E. Frankel, Gravitation in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D43, 2555 (1991)

1991
[97]

Balasubramanian and F

V. Balasubramanian and F. Larsen, Near-horizon geometry and black holes in four dimen- sions, Nucl. Phys. B528, 229 (1998)

1998
[98]

Birmingham, I

D. Birmingham, I. Sachs, and S. Sen, Entropy of three-dimensional black holes in string theory, Phys. Lett. B424, 275 (1998)

1998
[99]

S. P. de Alwis, Supergravity, the DBI action and black hole physics, Phys. Lett. B435, 31 (1998)

1998
[100]

Kaloper, Entropy count for extremal three-dimensional black strings, Phys

N. Kaloper, Entropy count for extremal three-dimensional black strings, Phys. Lett. B434, 285 (1998)

1998
[101]

Lee and Y

H. Lee and Y. Myung, Greybody factor for the BTZ black hole and a 5D black hole, Phys. Rev. D58, 104013 (1998)

1998
[102]

Maldacena and A

J. Maldacena and A. Strominger,AdS 3 black holes and a stringy exclusion principle, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 005

1998
[103]

Sachs, On universality in black hole thermodynamics, arXiv preprint hep-th/9804173 (1998)

I. Sachs, On universality in black hole thermodynamics, arXiv preprint hep-th/9804173 (1998)

1998 arXiv
[104]

Lee and R

J. Lee and R. M. Wald, Local symmetries and constraints, J. Math. Phys.31, 725 (1990)

1990
[105]

R. M. Wald,General Relativity(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

1984
[106]

Brice˜ no, C

M. Brice˜ no, C. Mart ´ ınez, and J. Zanelli, Central singularity of the BTZ geometries, Phys. Rev. D110, 024075 (2024)

2024
[107]

L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 787 (2008)

2008
[108]

Takagi, Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform acceleration: Hawking-Unruh effect in Rindler manifold of arbitrary dimension, Progr

S. Takagi, Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform acceleration: Hawking-Unruh effect in Rindler manifold of arbitrary dimension, Progr. Theor. Phys, Suppl.88, 1 (1986)

1986
[110]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Anomaly in conformal quantum mechanics: From molecular physics to black holes, Phys. Rev. D68, 125013 (2003)

2003
[112]

H. E. Camblong, L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, and C. A. Garc ´ ıa Canal, Dimensional trans- mutation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics: II. Rotational invariance, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)287, 57 (2001)

2001
[113]

Jackiw, Introducing scale symmetry, Phys

R. Jackiw, Introducing scale symmetry, Phys. Today25, 23 (1972)

1972
[114]

Jackiw, Dynamical symmetry of the magnetic monopole, Ann

R. Jackiw, Dynamical symmetry of the magnetic monopole, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)129, 183 (1980)

1980
[115]

Jackiw, Dynamical symmetry of the magnetic vortex, Ann

R. Jackiw, Dynamical symmetry of the magnetic vortex, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)201, 83 (1990)

1990
[116]

H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, P. Lopez Duque, and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Spectral properties of the symmetry generators of conformal quantum mechanics: A path-integral approach, J. Math. Phys.64, 092302 (2023)

2023
[117]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Regularized Green’s Function for the Inverse Square Potential, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 817–826 (2002)

2002
[118]

H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez, Path Integral Treatment of Singular Problems and Bound States, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19, 1413 (2004)

2004
[119]

Kuwata, M

M. Kuwata, M. Kenmoku, and K. Shigemoto, Eigenvalue problem of scalar fields in BTZ black hole spacetime, Prog. Theor. Phys.119, 939 (2008)

2008
[120]

Abramowitz and I

M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds.,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables(Dover Publications, New York, 1972)

1972
[121]

Ortiz, No superradiance for the scalar field in the BTZ black hole with reflexive boundary conditions, Phys

L. Ortiz, No superradiance for the scalar field in the BTZ black hole with reflexive boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D86, 047703 (2012)

2012
[122]

Klebanov, TASI Lectures: Introduction to the AdS/CFT Correspondence

I.R. Klebanov, TASI Lectures: Introduction to the AdS/CFT Correspondence. In: J. Har- vey, S. Kachru, and E. Silverstein (Eds.), Strings, branes and gravity, pp. 615-654 (World Scientific, 1998)

1998
[123]

Ferrara, A

S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, G. Parisi, and R. Gatto, The shadow operator formalism for con- formal algebra. Vacuum expectation values and operator products, Lett. Nuovo Cim.4, 115 (1972)

1972
[124]

Simmons-Duffin, Projectors, shadows, and conformal blocks, J

D. Simmons-Duffin, Projectors, shadows, and conformal blocks, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 146

2014
[125]

Brout, S

R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and Ph. Spindel, A primer for black hole quantum physics, Phys. Rep.260, 329 (1995). 56

1995
[126]

Fabbri and J

A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas,Modeling black hole evaporation(World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

2005
[127]

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997)

1997
[128]

Meystre and M

P. Meystre and M. Sargent III,Elements of Quantum Optics, 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007)

2007
[129]

Braak, Q

D. Braak, Q. H. Chen, M. T. Batchelor, and E. Solano, Semi-classical and quantum Rabi models: in celebration of 80 years, J. Phys. A49, 300301 (2016)

2016
[130]

J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance, Phys. Rev. D13, 2188 (1976)

1976
[131]

G. W. Gibbons and M. J. Perry, Black Holes in Thermal Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 985 (1976)

1976
[132]

M. O. Scully and W. E. Lamb Jr., Quantum theory of an optical maser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 853 (1966)

1966
[133]

M. O. Scully and W. E. Lamb Jr., Quantum theory of an optical maser. I. General theory, Phys. Rev.159, 208 (1967)

1967
[134]

C. R. Almeida and M. J. Jacquet, Analogue gravity and the Hawking effect: historical perspective and literature review, Eur. Phys. J. H48, 15 (2023)

2023
[135]

S. L. Braunstein, M. Faizal, L. M. Krauss, and N. A. Sha, Analogue simulations of quantum gravity with fluids, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 612 (2023)

2023
[136]

C. C. de Oliveira and R. A. Mosna, Analog model for the BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064030 (2022)

2022
[137]

C. C. de Oliveira, R. A. Mosna, and J. P. M. Pitelli, Robin boundary conditions in acoustic BTZ black holes, Phys. Rev. D107, 064018 (2023)

2023
[138]

L. Chen, H. Zhang, and B. Zhang, An optical analogue for rotating BTZ black holes, Com- mun. Theor. Phys.75, 035302 (2023)

2023
[139]

Chakraborty and B

K. Chakraborty and B. R. Majhi, Detector response along null geodesics in black hole space- times and in a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker universe, Phys. Rev. D100, 045004 (2019)

2019
[140]

S. M. A. S. Bukhari, I. A. Bhat, C. Xu, and L.-G. Wang, Nonthermal acceleration radiation of atoms near a black hole in presence of dark energy, Phys. Rev. D107, 105017 (2023). 57

2023
[141]

S. M. A. S. Bukhari and L.-G. Wang, Seeing dark matter via acceleration radiation, Phys. Rev. D109, 045009 (2024)

2024
[142]

¨Ovg¨ un, R

A. ¨Ovg¨ un, R. C. Pantig, B. Ahmedov, and U. Uktamov, Acceleration radiation of freely falling atoms: Nonlinear electrodynamic effects, Physics of the Dark Universe52, 102279 (2026)

2026
[143]

R. C. Pantig and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Horizon brightened acceleration radiation from massive vector fields, Phys. Rev. D113, 084040 (2026)

2026
[144]

R. C. Pantig, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, S. Masood, and L.-G. Wang, Acceleration radiation from vibrating atoms in Schwarzschild spacetime, Chin. J. Phys.103, 89 (2026)

2026
[145]

¨Ovg¨ un, Quasinormal mode spectroscopy via horizon-brightened quantum optics, Eur

A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Quasinormal mode spectroscopy via horizon-brightened quantum optics, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 293 (2026)

2026
[146]

S. Sen, R. Mandal, and S. Gangopadhyay, Near horizon aspects of acceleration radiation of an atom falling into a class of static spherically symmetric black hole geometries, Phys. Rev. D106, 025004 (2022)

2022
[147]

A. Das, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Horizon brightened accelerated radiation in the back- ground of braneworld black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 064087 (2024)

2024
[148]

S. Sen, R. Mandal, and S. Gangopadhyay, Equivalence principle and HBAR entropy of an atom falling into a quantum corrected black hole, Phys. Rev. D105, 085007 (2022)

2022
[149]

A. Jana, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Atom falling into a quantum corrected charged black hole and HBAR entropy, Phys. Rev. D110, 026029 (2024)

2024
[150]

A. Jana, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Inverse logarithmic correction in the horizon bright- ened acceleration radiation entropy of an atom falling into a renormalization group improved charged black hole, Phys. Rev. D111, 085017 (2025)

2025
[151]

¨Ovg¨ un, and R

A. ¨Ovg¨ un, and R. C. Pantig, HBAR entropy of infalling atoms into a GUP-corrected Schwarzschild black hole and equivalence principle, Phys. Lett. A568, 131201 (2026)

2026
[152]

A. Das, S. Sen, and S. Gangopadhyay, Derivative coupling in horizon brightened acceleration radiation: A quantum optics approach, Phys. Rev. D112, 065006 (2025)

2025
[153]

R. C. Pantig and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Acceleration radiation from derivative-coupled atoms falling in modified gravity black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1183 (2025)

2025
[154]

A. M. Frassino, R. B. Mann, and J. R. Mureika, Lower-dimensional black hole chemistry, Phys. Rev. D92, 124069 (2015). 58

2015
[155]

Brito, V

R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani,Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, 2nd ed. (Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 971, Springer, 2020)

2020
[156]

B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime, Phys. Rep.19, 295 (1975)

1975
[157]

Klein, Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac, Z

O. Klein, Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac, Z. Phys.53, 157 (1929)

1929
[158]

R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. D93, 99 (1954)

1954
[159]

Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Generation of waves by a rotating body, JETP Lett.14, 180 (1971)

1971
[160]

Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Amplification of cylindrical electromagnetic waves reflected from a rotating body, Sov. Phys. JETP35, 1085 (1972)

1972
[161]

Penrose and R

R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nature Physical Science229, 177 (1971)

1971
[162]

Misner, Stability of Kerr black holes against scalar perturbations, Bull

C. Misner, Stability of Kerr black holes against scalar perturbations, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 17, 472 (1972)

1972
[163]

black hole,

A. A. Starobinskii, Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating “black hole,” Sov. Phys. JETP37, 28 (1973)

1973
[164]

W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Floating orbits, superradiant scattering and the black-hole bomb, Nature238, 211 (1972)

1972
[165]

black hole,

A. A. Starobinskii and S. M. Churilov, Amplification of electromagnetic and gravitational waves scattered by a rotating “black hole,” Sov. Phys. JETP38, 1 (1974)

1974
[166]

W. G. Unruh, Second quantization in the Kerr metric. Phys. Rev. D10, 3194 (1974)

1974
[167]

J. D. Bekenstein, Extraction of energy and charge from a black hole, Phys. Rev. D7, 949 (1973)

1973
[168]

A. C. Ottewill and E. Winstanley, Renormalized stress tensor in Kerr space-time: General results, Phys. Rev. D62, 084018 (2000)

2000
[169]

A. L. Matacz, P. C. W. Davies, and A. C. Ottewill, Quantum vacuum instability near rotating stars, Phys. Rev. D47, 1557 (1993)

1993
[170]

Balakumar, E

V. Balakumar, E. Winstanley, R. P. Bernar, and L. C. B. Crispino, Quantum superradiance on static black hole space-times, Phys. Lett. B811, 135904 (2020). 59

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [109]

Kenmoku, M

M. Kenmoku, M. Kuwata, and K. Shigemoto, Normal modes and the no zero mode theorem of scalar fields in BTZ black hole spacetime, Classical Quantum Gravity25, 145016 (2008)

2008

[2] [111]

H. E. Camblong, L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, and C. A. Garc ´ ıa Canal, Dimensional transmu- tation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics: I. General theory, Ann. Phys. 55 (N.Y.)287, 14 (2001)

2001

[3] [1]

Metric relations and locally diagonal metric From Eqs. (13)–(20), the following statements can be straightforwardly derived for the sector (t, ϕ): gtt =ξ (t) ·ξ (t) ̸= gtt −1 , g ˜t˜t =ξ (˜t) ·ξ (˜t) = D gϕϕ = g ˜t˜t −1 = gtt −1 ,(A1) whereD=g ttgϕϕ −(g tϕ)2; and for their relation to the radial sector, −gtt =−g ˜t˜t =g rr ,−g ˜t˜t = (grr)−1 =g rr .(A2) M...

[4] [2]

II B, the structure of the BTZ spacetime involves two sets of surfaces that can be identified as critical boundaries

Structure of BTZ spacetime As summarized in Sec. II B, the structure of the BTZ spacetime involves two sets of surfaces that can be identified as critical boundaries. This can be understood from the properties of the Killing vectorsξ (t) andξ (˜t) in Eqs. (14) and (19), and their relation to the metric (13). First, starting sufficiently far away from the ...

[5] [3]

(84) and (85) can be extended to their next orders by considering the expansions of ˇe,f(r), and r, so thatdr/dτincludes the first orderO(x)

Radial geodesics For the radial geodesics (40), the leading ingoing near-horizon expressions of Eqs. (84) and (85) can be extended to their next orders by considering the expansions of ˇe,f(r), and r, so thatdr/dτincludes the first orderO(x). Specifically, from Eqs. (33) and (34), ˇe (H) ∼˜e−(ϖ +)′ℓx(B1) whereϖ +(r+) = ΩH and (ϖ+)′ =dϖ +(r)/dr r+ =−J/r 3 ...

[6] [4]

(36), the next order in the lapse function is needed

Coordinate-time geodesics For the coordinate-time geodesics, starting from Eq. (36), the next order in the lapse function is needed. Using Eqs. (60)–(61), f(r) (H) ∼f ′ + x+ 1 2 f ′′ +x2 +O(x 3) =f ′ + x 1 + 1 2 f ′′ + f ′ + x+O(x 2) ,(B7) so that, withκ=f ′ +/2 and Eq. (B1), dt dτ (H) ∼ ˇe 2κx 1− 1 2 f ′′ + f ′ + x (H) ∼ ˜e 2κx 1− (ϖ+)′ℓx ˜e 1− 1 2 f ′′ ...

[7] [5]

This precisely defines a constantαin Eq

Azimuthal geodesics Finally, for the azimuthal geodesics, we can use the black hole corotating frame for a quick, direct evaluation of ˜ϕ. This precisely defines a constantαin Eq. (87), which is to be 37 used in the transition integrals of Eq. (92). Specifically, from the geodesic Eq. (37) for ˜ϕ combined with the radial geodesic (40): − d ˜ϕ dx =− d ˜ϕ/d...

[8] [6]

This equation has three regular singular points: (i) the inner horizonr=r −; (ii) the outer horizonr=r +; and (iii) spatial infinityr=∞

General form of the exact solution The differential equation (48) for a scalar field in the BTZ geometry is set up in terms of the radial functionR mω(r). This equation has three regular singular points: (i) the inner horizonr=r −; (ii) the outer horizonr=r +; and (iii) spatial infinityr=∞. Therefore, there exists a transformation that converts it into a ...