Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 165 references

Interaction energies of H$_2$ and CO on transition-metal surfaces computed by a range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional predicts the H2 dissociative chemisorption barrier on Cu(111) to within about 1 kcal/mol of the fitted reference.

desk verdict Real numbers and honest hedging, but gamma* is the size-limit boundary, not a completed optimal tuning. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15066 v1 pith:ARDD3H7O submitted 2026-07-16 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Per Hyldgaard This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords dissociativechemisorptionvanderWaalsdensityfunctionalrange-separatedhybridH2onCu(111)quasi-particleoptimaltuningCOadsorptionsitepreferencebarrierheight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a particular range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional, AHBR(γ*), can describe the classical barrier for H2 dissociating on Cu(111) with near-chemical accuracy: a predicted barrier of 0.678 eV against a 0.628 eV benchmark from fitted SRP-DFT, a deviation of about 1 kcal/mol. The functional achieves this while also giving qualitatively correct CO adsorption site preferences on four transition-metal surfaces, an independent check that its charge-transfer behavior is plausible. The central idea is to select the functional's range-separation parameter γ non-empirically by tuning it so that isolated-molecule quasi-particle levels match adiabatic ionization potentials, then importing that value into the metal-surface calculation. This matters because dissociative chemisorption is a rate-limiting step in catalysis, and getting barrier heights reliably from first principles without system-specific fitting has been an open challenge.

What carries the argument

The key object is AHBR(γ), a range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional that mixes a fraction α=0.25 of short-range Fock exchange into the B86R semilocal exchange, with an inverse length scale γ controlling the crossover to screened exchange at large electron-hole separations. The paper uses the molecule-optimized sibling AHBR-mRSH(γ) to perform optimal tuning: adjusting γ until the HOMO level of a small molecule aligns with its adiabatic ionization potential. That tuned γ is then imported into the metal-compatible AHBR(γ) form for the surface calculation, justified by the claim that for the compact H2 molecule the two functionals give equivalent exchange descriptions when γ ≤ 0

What would settle it

Re-run the H2+Cu(111) barrier calculation at a γ value slightly larger than 0.5 a0^-1 where AHBR-mRSH(γ) actually brings the H2 HOMO level into alignment with the adiabatic IP (i.e., beyond the size-limit cutoff). If the barrier shifts by more than 1 kcal/mol away from 0.678 eV, the near-chemical-accuracy result is a consequence of the hard cutoff rather than a converged non-empirical choice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The AHBR(γ*) descriptor, with γ* = 0.5 a0^-1, predicts the H2+Cu(111) dissociative chemisorption barrier at 0.678 eV, within about 1 kcal/mol of the SRP-DFT reference value of 0.628 eV (0.635 eV elsewhere in the paper). The same functional family, at its default setting, predicts the experimentally observed top-site preference for CO on Cu(111), Ag(111), Au(111), and Pt(111), which standard semilocal functionals get wrong. The paper argues that the choice of γ* is guided by optimal tuning of molecular quasi-particle levels in the molecule-optimized AHBR-mRSH(γ) generalization, and that the resulting AHBR(γ*) retains a derivative discontinuity that suppresses spurious charge transfer, making

Load-bearing premise

The protocol assumes that a range-separation parameter tuned against isolated-molecule ionization potentials can be imported into the metal-surface calculation, even though at the chosen γ* = 0.5 a0^-1 the H2 HOMO level (-16.30 eV) does not match the functional's own adiabatic IP (16.96 eV), so the optimal-tuning criterion is not actually satisfied; the choice is the size-limit boundary, not a converged OT value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If accurate, AHBR(γ*) gives a computationally cheaper alternative to RPA-level treatments for the H2+Cu(111) barrier, with near-chemical accuracy.
  • The correct CO site preferences suggest the functional captures the forward- and back-donation balance that GGA and many vdW-DFs miss.
  • The QP-tuning protocol is transferable in principle: the paper finds the tuned γ decreases with adsorbate size, suggesting extensions to other small-molecule/metal reactions.
  • The barrier prediction can be fed into dynamical simulations of sticking probability and compared with molecular-beam experiments, providing a direct experimental test.
  • The paper notes a practical 45% AHBR / 55% vdW-DF2-b86r merger that exactly matches the SRP-DFT barrier, but emphasizes it is empirical rather than non-empirical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the chosen γ* sits at the size-limit boundary rather than at a converged optimal-tuning point, a natural next step is to compute the barrier for slightly larger γ (e.g., 0.55 a0^-1) and see whether the near-chemical-accuracy result is robust or an artifact of the cutoff; the paper's own data show the barrier falls toward 0.550 eV as γ→∞.
  • The same tuning recipe could be tested on other benchmarked dissociative chemisorption systems (e.g., O2 or N2 on metal surfaces) where SRP-DFT barriers exist, to see whether the non-empirical protocol generalizes.
  • If the derivative-discontinuity argument is right, the functional should also improve descriptions of charge transfer in other molecule-surface systems where delocalization errors plague GGA, such as CO2 or NO adsorption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper tests the range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional AHBR and its gamma-tuned variants for the classical dissociative chemisorption barrier of H2 on Cu(111) and for CO adsorption-site preferences on Cu, Ag, Au, and Pt(111). The central proposal is a 'constrained optimal tuning' procedure: first tune the molecule-optimized AHBR-mRSH(gamma) functional so that the H2 HOMO level matches the adiabatic IP, while respecting a size-based upper limit gamma'' = 0.5 a0^-1; then use the corresponding metal-compatible AHBR(gamma*) for the surface calculation. The paper reports AHBR(gamma* = 0.5 a0^-1) barrier of 0.678 eV, compared with the SRP-DFT reference of 0.628 eV (elsewhere 0.635 eV), and qualitatively correct CO top-site preferences.

Significance. If the non-empirical justification were fully established, the paper would offer a practical route to near-chemical-accuracy surface-reaction barriers within a single-parameter RSH vdW-DF framework, with the parameter set by molecular QP physics rather than by fitting to the target barrier. The strength of the paper lies in its transparent convergence documentation (Tables I and II), the independent CO chemisorption cross-check, and the explicit acknowledgment that the H2 OT criterion is not completed at the selected gamma*. These features make the work reproducible and the central limitation clearly visible. However, the main claim is conditional on the transfer of a not-fully-converged molecular tuning parameter to the metal-surface calculation, which is currently the weakest link.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Table VII] The optimal-tuning criterion is not satisfied at the selected gamma* = 0.5 a0^-1: Table VII gives -epsilon_H = 16.30 eV versus IP = 16.96 eV, a mismatch of 0.66 eV, and the text itself states that alignment requires a larger gamma value. Thus gamma* is not a converged OT value but the imposed upper boundary gamma''. Since E_B varies from 0.689 eV at gamma = 0.450 to 0.678 eV at gamma = 0.500 (Table III), the near-agreement with SRP could arise from choosing the boundary rather than from QP physics. The paper should either show that the barrier is insensitive to gamma in the range where H2 OT would actually converge, or provide an independent test of AHBR(gamma*) that does not rely on this boundary pick.
  2. [Table III / Fig. 3] The barrier is a monotonically decreasing function of gamma in the range 0.106-0.500 a0^-1, with a slope of roughly 0.1 eV per 1 a0^-1 at the upper end. The choice gamma* = gamma'' is therefore not a stationary point. Without an estimate of the uncertainty associated with the incomplete OT, the claim of 'near chemical accuracy' is not robust. A sensitivity analysis or an error bar derived from the spread of molecule-specific OT gamma values would be needed to support the central conclusion.
  3. [Table II and Sec. IV] The CO site-preference cross-check is performed with the default AHBR (gamma = 0.106 a0^-1), not with the proposed AHBR(gamma* = 0.5 a0^-1). The paper asserts that molecular-energy differences have only a soft gamma dependence, but no CO adsorption data at gamma* are given. Consequently, the CO results do not validate the specific descriptor AHBR(gamma*); they only validate the default AHBR. Please report at least one CO site-preference value at gamma* or explain why the transferability of the gamma* choice to CO is established.
  4. [Sec. II.A, Table III, abstract] The SRP-DFT reference barrier is quoted inconsistently as 0.628 eV in the Introduction and Table III and as 0.635 eV in Sec. II.A. Since the central claim is that AHBR(gamma*) is within chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol = 0.043 eV) of this target, the discrepancy matters: 0.678 eV is 0.050 eV above 0.628 eV but 0.043 eV above 0.635 eV. The paper must state which value is the benchmark and discuss whether the result is within or slightly outside chemical accuracy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] Typographical errors include 'slap' for 'slab' (Sec. III), 'inverse-scatting' for 'inverse-scattering' (Sec. II.A), and 'tricker' for 'trigger' (Introduction). These should be corrected.
  2. [Table I] The convergence table is incomplete: for k=6, q=5 and q=6 entries are blank, and for k=10 only the q=4 result is shown. Please provide the full grid or indicate which entries were not computed.
  3. [Table III header] The row label '∆BEAHBR H2-Cu' appears to mix notation; it should be consistent with E_B^{AHBR} used in the text.
  4. [Sec. II.B, Fig. 2] The equivalence argument between AHBR(gamma) and AHBR-mRSH(gamma) would benefit from an explicit statement that it applies to total exchange energies, not to individual orbital levels. Table VII shows HOMO energies differing by more than 5 eV at gamma=0.5, which could confuse readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the AHBR(γ*) barrier estimate is not fitted to the SRP benchmark; the incomplete H2 optimal tuning is a correctness limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central barrier number, E_AHBR_B(γ*)=0.678 eV, is compared with the external SRP-DFT benchmark E_SRP=0.628 eV [6], but nothing in the selection of γ* uses E_SRP. The paper explicitly distinguishes its proposed non-empirical route from an empirical fit: 'Reliance on an apparent flexibility in AHBR(γ), with respect to γ tuning, to seek SRP-DFT alignment is not the end purpose here.' The γ* choice is instead set by a constrained optimal-tuning argument on AHBR-mRSH(γ), aligning the H2 HOMO with the adiabatic IP, and by the molecular-size limit γ''=0.5 a0^-1 (1/γ''=2a0, with H2 bond length 0.74 Å and vdW radius 1.2 Å). This size constraint is independent of the barrier target. The barrier scan in Fig. 3 and Table III is used as a characterization, not as the selection criterion, and the paper even labels the alternative AHBR/vdW-DF2-b86r mixing that does target E_SRP as 'empirical, system-specific.' Self-citations to Refs. [56,87,96] are present, but the central surface calculations are new here, and the molecular QP claims are cross-checked against Baerends' true-KS results and experimental ionization data [47], so the load is not carried solely by self-citation. The one substantive weakness is correctly flagged by the paper itself: Appendix A and Table VII show that at γ*=0.5 the AHBR-mRSH HOMO is -εH=16.30 eV versus IP=16.96 eV, and the text states that 'alignment, i.e., OT success, does require one to go to a larger γ'' value.' Thus the OT is not fully converged at the selected boundary, weakening the claimed non-empirical QP guidance and possibly introducing selection pressure. That is a validity/robustness concern about the protocol, not a circular reduction: the SRP barrier is never an input to the definition of γ*, and the barrier prediction is not statistically forced by any fitted parameter. No circular step meeting the required evidence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The central free parameter is gamma, with alpha fixed and gamma'' set by molecular-size reasoning. The key extras are domain assumptions about the validity of SRP-DFT as benchmark and about the transferability of isolated-molecule OT to a metal surface.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma (range-separation inverse length) = 0.5 a0^-1 for H2 AHBR(gamma*); 0.346 a0^-1 as average for other small molecules
    Central tunable parameter of the AHBR(gamma) family; scanned in Table III/Fig. 3. The H2 value is set by the size-limit boundary gamma''=0.5, not by a completed HOMO=-IP alignment in Table VII.
  • gamma'' (molecule-size tuning limit) = 0.5 a0^-1
    Hand-set by the requirement 1/gamma''=2a0 ~ 1 Angstrom larger than the H2 extension; used to justify equivalence of AHBR and AHBR-mRSH exchange in the molecular region.
  • alpha0 (Fock-exchange mixing fraction) = 0.25
    Fixed default inherited from prior AHBR/HSE-style construction; not tuned here, but the central barrier result depends on this value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation and ground-state adiabatic DFT describe H2+Cu(111) dissociative chemisorption dynamics.
    Invoked throughout the introduction and Sec. II.A; non-adiabatic effects are discussed but assumed small because E_CT approximately 8 eV.
  • domain assumption The SRP-DFT barrier E_SRP=0.628 eV (0.635 eV elsewhere) is the correct benchmark for the classical DC barrier.
    Sec. II.A uses the SRP-DFT value from Ref. [6] as the target; this benchmark is itself an empirical inverse-scattering fit, not a direct experimental barrier measurement.
  • ad hoc to paper For gamma<=gamma''=0.5 a0^-1, AHBR(gamma) and AHBR-mRSH(gamma) give equivalent exchange-energy descriptions in the H2 molecular region.
    Sec. II.B and Fig. 2 argue the equivalence from 1/gamma being larger than the molecular extent; this is the bridge that imports isolated-molecule QP tuning into the metal-surface AHBR calculation.
  • domain assumption Optimal tuning to enforce -epsilon_HOMO = adiabatic IP yields accurate quasiparticle levels and suppresses delocalization errors.
    Appendix A and Refs. [49,52] establish the OT criterion; the paper relies on it to justify the gamma* pick.
  • ad hoc to paper AHBR(gamma*) retains a derivative discontinuity sufficient to suppress spurious charge transfer at barrier geometries.
    Inferred from fractional-charge curves in Fig. 2 bottom panel; not directly verified at the actual H2/Cu(111) barrier geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interaction energies of H$_2$ and CO on transition-metal surfaces computed by a range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ARDD3H7O

@misc{pith2026260715066,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interaction energies of H$_2$ and CO on transition-metal surfaces computed by a range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ARDD3H7O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15066}
}
abstract

Dissociative chemisorption (DC) of H$_2$ on the Cu(111) surface is a prototypical problem for understanding elements of heterogeneous catalysis [Science 326, 832 (2009)]. The challenge lies in modeling the reaction dynamics that in turn reflects a classical potential for atomic deformations, friction, and inelastic scattering. Here, I test the use of a set of range-separated hybrid (RSH) van der Waals density functionals (vdW-DFs) [JPCM 37, 211501 (2025)] on their ability to describe the classical barrier for dynamics in this H$_2$+Cu(111) DC problem. I furthermore document use of a variant for fast accurate predictions of the molecular quasi-particles (QPs), finding excellent performance across a set of small molecules that are often studied in catalysis. Finally, I suggest and implement a way to use that QP focus to identify what I consider a best-possible non-empirical (yet adsorbate specific) RSH vdW-DF version, denoted AHBR($\gamma^*$) for H$_2$ DC modeling, navigating what are partly conflicting requirements on the molecule and metal sides. I find that the AHBR($\gamma^*$) can determine the classical H$_2$+Cu(111) DC barrier height close to chemical accuracy. I suggest that DC modeling can test broader relevance of the physics underpinning these RSH vdW-DFs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15066 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. contrasts KS DFT studies of the interac￾tion potential for physisorption of H2 on Cu(111) with a curve representing experimental observations of Fano resonances created by interference in elastic-scattering events [20, 135]. The curve marked ‘Exper.’ emerges af￾ter interpretation of that resonance data within a model designed to capture the nature of physisorption at metal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Variation in performance of AHBR, as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Total-internal energy variation with increasing par [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

165 extracted references

  1. [1]

    G. Ertl, M. Grunze, and M. Weiss, Chemisorption of N2 on an Fe(100) surface, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.13, 314 (1976)

    1976

  2. [2]

    G. Ertl, M. Huber, S. B. Lee, Z. Pa´ al, and M. Weiss, Interactions of nitrogen and hydrogen on iron surfaces, Applic. Surf. Sci.8, 373 (1981)

    1981

  3. [3]

    In fact, a key aspect of the Blyholder model for CO adsorption [25] is the emphasis on getting both outbound and inbound charge transfers right

    Equally important, however, is the expectation, from having the QP and MBPT connection, that use of such non-empirical (yet adsorbate specific) AHBR(γ ∗) may deliver robust descriptions of adsorbate-surface charge transfer in chemisorption. In fact, a key aspect of the Blyholder model for CO adsorption [25] is the emphasis on getting both outbound and inb...

    arXiv 1910

  4. [4]

    Ertl, Reaction mechanisms in catalysis by metals, Crit

    G. Ertl, Reaction mechanisms in catalysis by metals, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci.10, 349 (1982)

    1982

  5. [5]

    B. I. Lundqvist, Theoretical aspects of adsorption and heterogeneous catalysis, Vacuum33, 639 (1983)

    1983

  6. [6]

    Engdahl, B

    C. Engdahl, B. I. Lundqvist, U. Nielsen, and J. K. Nørskov, Multidimensional effects in dissociative chemisorption: H 2 on Cu and Ni surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11362 (1992)

    1992

  7. [7]

    C. Diaz, E. Pijper, R. A. Olsen, H. F. Busnengo, D. J. Auerbach, and G.-J. Kroes, Chemically Accurate Sim- ulation of a Prototypical Surface Reaction: H 2 Dissoci- ation on Cu(111), Science326, 832 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    Jiang and H

    B. Jiang and H. Guo, Dynamics in reactions on metallic surfaces: A theoretical perspective, J. Chem. Phys.150, 180901 (2019)

    2019

Show all 165 references
  1. [9]

    Kroes, Computational approaches to dissociative chemisorption on metals: Towards chemical accuracy, Chem

    G.-J. Kroes, Computational approaches to dissociative chemisorption on metals: Towards chemical accuracy, Chem. Phys. Phys. Chem.23, 8962 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    B. I. Lundqvist, O. Gunnarsson, H. Hjelmberg, and J. K. Nørskov, Theoretical description of molecule-metal 16 interaction and surface reactions, Surf. Sci.89, 196 (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    H. F. Berger, M. Leisch, A. Winkler, and K. D. Ren- dulic, A search for vibrational contributions to the ac- tivated adsorption of H 2 on copper, Chem. Phys. Lett. 175, 425 (1990)

    1990

  4. [12]

    H. A. Michelsen, C. T. Rettner, D. J. Auerbach, and R. N. Zare, Effect of rotation on the translational and vibrational energy dependence of the dissociative ad- sorption of D 2 on Cu(111), J. Chem. Phys.98, 8294 (1993)

    1993

  5. [13]

    C. T. Rettner, H. A. Michelsen, and D. J. Auerbach, Quantum-state-specific dynamics of the dissociative ad- sorption and associative desorption of H 2 at a Cu(111) surface, J. Chem. Phys.102, 4625 (1995)

    1995

  6. [14]

    D. A. McCormack, G.-J. Kroes, E.-J. Baerends, and R. C. Mowrey, Six-dimensional quantum dynamics of dissociation of rotationally excited H2 on Cu(100), Fara- day Discuss.110, 267 (1998)

    1998

  7. [15]

    S. Gao, J. Str¨ omquist, and B. I. Lundqvist, Dissipa- tive Quantum Dynamics in 2D: Anisotropic Dissipation and Selective Bond Breaking in Surface Photochemistry, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1805 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    Kroes, Frontiers in Surface Scattering Simulations, Science321, 794 (2008)

    G.-J. Kroes, Frontiers in Surface Scattering Simulations, Science321, 794 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    D. J. Auerbach, D. Babikov, A. Butler, D. W. Chan- dler, J. Fingerhut, H. Guo, D. J. Harding, D. Heath- cote, N. Hertl, B. Jiang, G.-J. Kroes, P. D. Lane, J. Loreau, S. R. Mackenzie, K. G. McKendrick, D. R. Moon, G. M. Nathanson, D. M. Neumark, R. Pandey, G. C. Schatz, S. J. S...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Foster andet al, Towards the accurate prediction of barriers for reactions on metal surfaces, Invited perspec- tive, Phys

    A. Foster andet al, Towards the accurate prediction of barriers for reactions on metal surfaces, Invited perspec- tive, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (2026)

    2026

  11. [19]

    B. I. Lundqvist, T. Fond´ en, J. Idiodi, P. Johnsson, A. M¨ allo, and S. Papadia, Theoretical descriptions of atomic and molecular chemisorption on metals, Prog. Surf. Sci.25, 191 (1987)

    1987

  12. [20]

    Wijzenbroek, D

    M. Wijzenbroek, D. M. Klein, B. Smits, M. F. Somers, and G.-J. Kroes, Performance of a Non-Local van der Waals Density Functional on the Dissociation of H 2 on Metal Surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. A119, 12146 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Andersson, L

    S. Andersson, L. Wilz´ en, and M. Persson, Physisorption interaction of H2 with noble-metal surfaces: A new H 2- Cu potential, Phys. Rev. B38, 2967 (1988)

    1988

  14. [22]

    Andersson, M

    S. Andersson, M. Persson, and J. Harris, Physisorption energies: Influence of surface structure, Surf. Sci.360, L499 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    K. Lee, A. K. Kelkkanen, K. Berland, S. Andersson, D. C. Langreth, E. Schr¨ oder, B. I. Lundqvist, and P. Hyldgaard, Evaluation of a density functional with account of van der Waals forces using experimental data of H 2 physisorption on Cu(111), Phys. Rev. B84, 193408 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    S. Arrhenius, ¨Uber die Dissociationsw¨ arme und den Einfluss der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elektrolyte (On the heat of dissociation and the influ- ence of temperature on the degree of dissociation of the electrolytes), Z. Phys. Chem.4, 96 (1889)

  17. [25]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  18. [26]

    Blyholder, Molecular Orbital View of Chemisorbed Carbon Monoxide, J

    G. Blyholder, Molecular Orbital View of Chemisorbed Carbon Monoxide, J. Phys. Chem.68, 2772 (1964)

    1964

  19. [27]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle Green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle Green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  20. [28]

    G. D. Mahan, Van der Waals Forces in Solids, J. Chem. Phys.43, 1569 (1965)

    1965

  21. [29]

    B. I. Lundqvist, Single-Particle Spectrum of the Degen- erate Electron Gas. I. The Structure of the Spectral Weight Function, Phys. Kondens. Materie6, 193 (1967)

    1967

  22. [30]

    D. C. Langreth, Singularities in the X-Ray Spectra of Metals, Phys. Rev. B1, 471 (1970)

    1970

  23. [31]

    Hedin and B

    L. Hedin and B. I. Lundqvist, Explicit local exchange- correlation potentials, J. Phys. C4, 2064 (1971)

  24. [32]

    Gunnarsson and B

    O. Gunnarsson and B. I. Lundqvist, Exchange and cor- relation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin- density-functional formalism, Phys. Rev. B13, 4274 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Exchange-correlation energy of a metallic surface: Wave-vector analysis, Phys. Rev. B15, 2884 (1977)

    1977

  26. [34]

    J. K. Nørskov and B. I. Lundqvist, Correlation be- tween sticking probability and adsorbate-induced elec- tron structure, Surf. Sci.89, 251 (1979)

    1979

  27. [35]

    D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Theory of nonuniform electronic systems. I. Analysis of the gradient approxi- mation and a generalization that works, Phys. Rev. B 21, 5469 (1980)

    1980

  28. [36]

    Hedin, Effects of recoil on shake-up spectra in metals, Phys

    L. Hedin, Effects of recoil on shake-up spectra in metals, Phys. Scr.21, 477 (1980)

    1980

  29. [37]

    J. P. Perdew, R. G. Parr, M. Levy, and J. J. L. Balduz, Density-Functional Theory for Fractional Particle Num- ber: Derivative Discontinutities of the Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1691 (1982)

    1982

  30. [38]

    M. Levy, J. P. Perdew, and J. P. Sahni, Exact differen- tial equation for the density and the ionization energy of a many-particle system, Phys. Rev. A30, 2745 (1984)

    1984

  31. [39]

    M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasi- particle energies, Phys. Rev. B34, 5390 (1986)

    1986

  32. [40]

    R. O. Jones and O. Gunnarsson, The density functional formalism, its applications and prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys.61, 689 (1989)

    1989

  33. [41]

    A. C. Maggs and N. W. Ashcroft, Electronic fluctuation and cohesion in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 113 (1987)

    1987

  34. [42]

    Rapcewicz and N

    K. Rapcewicz and N. W. Ashcroft, Fluctuation attrac- tion in condensed matter: A nonlocal functional ap- proach, Phys. Rev. B44, 4032 (1991)

    1991

  35. [43]

    Hammer and J

    B. Hammer and J. K. Nørskov, Why gold is the noblest of all the metals, Nature376, 238 (1995)

    1995

  36. [44]

    Hammer and J

    B. Hammer and J. K. Nørskov, Electronic factors deter- mining the reactivity of metal surfaces, Surf. Sci.343, 211 (1995)

    1995

  37. [45]

    E. J. Baerends and O. V. Gritsenko, A Quantum Chem- ical View of Density Functional Theory, J. Phys. Chem. A101, 5383 (1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    W. G. Aulbur, L. J¨ onsson, and J. W. Wilkins, Quasi- particle Calculations in Solids, inSolid State Physics, Vol. 54, edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehren- reich (Academic Press, New York, 2000) p. 1

    2000

  39. [47]

    D. P. Chong, O. V. Gritsenko, and E. J. Baerends, In- terpretation of the Kohn-Sham orbital energies as ap- 17 proximate vertical ionization potentials, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1760 (2002)

    2002

  40. [48]

    O. V. Gritsenko, B. Bra ¨ ıda, and E. J. Baerends, Physi- cal interpretation and evaluation of the Kohn-Sham and Dyson components of theϵ−Irelations between the Kohn-Sham orbital energies and the ionization poten- tials, J. Chem. Phys.119, 1937 (2003)

    1937

  41. [49]

    I. Dabo, A. Ferretti, N. Poilvert, Y. Li, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, Koopmans’ condition for density- functional theory, Phys. Rev. B82, 115121 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Refaely-Abramson, S

    S. Refaely-Abramson, S. Sharifzadeh, N. Govind, J. Autschbach, J. B. Neaton, R. Baer, and L. Kro- nik, Quasiparticle Spectra from a Nonempirical Opti- mally Tuned Range-Separated Hybrid Density Func- tional, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 226405 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Kraisler and L

    E. Kraisler and L. Kronik, Piecewise Linearity of Ap- proximate Density Functionals Revisited: Implications for Frontier Orbital Energies, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 126403 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    N. L. Nguyen, G. Borghi, A. Ferretti, I. Dabo, and N. Marzari, First-Principles Photoemission Spec- troscopy and Orbital Tomography in Molecules from Koopmans-Compliant Functionals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 166405 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Z.-F. Liu, D. A. Egger, S. Refaely-Abramson, L. Kro- nik, and J. B. Neaton, Energy level alignment at molecule-metal interfaces from an optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functional, J. Chem. Phys.146, 092326 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    D. Wing, G. Ohad, J. B. Haber, M. R. Filip, S. E. Gant, J. B. Neaton, and L. Kronik, Band gaps of crystalline solids from Wannier-localization–based optimal tuning of a screened range-separated hybrid functional, PNAS 118, e2104556118 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Hyldgaard, Y

    P. Hyldgaard, Y. Jiao, and V. Shukla, Screening nature of the van der Waals density functional method: A re- view and analysis of the many-body physics foundation, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 393001 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Racioppi, P

    S. Racioppi, P. Lolur, P. Hyldgaard, and M. Rahm, A Density Functional Theory for the Average Electron En- ergy, J. Chem. Theory Comput19, 799 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Schr¨ oder, R

    E. Schr¨ oder, R. Quintero-Monsebaiz, Y. Jiao, and P. Hyldgaard, Optimally tuned range-separated hybrid van der Waals density functional for molecular binding and quasiparticle characterizations, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter.37, 211501 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Quintero-Monsebaiz and P

    R. Quintero-Monsebaiz and P. Hyldgaard, Quasiparti- cle states of hexagonal BN: A van der Waals density functional study, Phys. Rev. B113, 195127 (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    Nozi` eres and D

    P. Nozi` eres and D. Pines, Correlation energy of a free electron gas, Phys. Rev.111, 442 (1958)

    1958

  52. [60]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum theory of many-particle systems(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1971) pp. 64–82

    1971

  53. [61]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics, 2nd ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1990)

    1990

  54. [62]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  55. [63]

    Racioppi, P

    S. Racioppi, P. Hyldgaard, and M. Rahm, Quantify- ing Atomic Volume, Partial Charge, and Electronega- tivity in Condensed Phases, J. Phys. Chem. C128, 4009 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    B. I. Lundqvist, B. Hellsing, S. Holmstr¨ om, P. Nordlan- der, M. Persson, and J. K. Nørskov, Theoretical stud- ies of molecular adsorption on metal surfaces, Intl. J. Quant. Chem.23, 1083 (1983)

    1983

  57. [65]

    A. K. Kelkkanen, B. I. Lundqvist, and J. K. Nørskov, Van der Waals effect in weak adsorption affecting trends in adsorption, reactivity, and the view of substrate no- bility, Phys. Rev. B83, 113401 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Hellsing, M

    B. Hellsing, M. Persson, and B. I. Lundqvist, Elec- tronic damping mechanism for vibrations, rotations, and translations of adsorbates on metal surfaces, Surf. Sci126, 147 (1983)

    1983

  59. [67]

    Hellsing and M

    B. Hellsing and M. Persson, Electronic Damping of Atomic and Molecular Vibrations at Metal Surfaces, Phys. Scr.29, 306 (1984)

    1984

  60. [68]

    Head-Gordon and J

    M. Head-Gordon and J. C. Tully, Molecular dynam- ics with electronic frictions, J. Chem. Phys.103, 10137 (1995)

    1995

  61. [69]

    Huang, C

    Y. Huang, C. T. Rettner, D. J. Auerbach, and A. M. Wodtke, Vibrational Promotion of Electron Transfer, Science290, 111 (2000)

    2000

  62. [70]

    Gerrits, E

    N. Gerrits, E. W. F. Smeets, S. Vuckovic, A. D. Powell, K. Doblhoff-Dier, and G.-J. Kroes, Density Functional Theory for Molecule-Metal Surface Reactions: When Does the Generalized Gradient Approximation Get It Right, and What to Do If It Does Not, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 10552 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Zaremba and W

    E. Zaremba and W. Kohn, van der Waals interaction between an atom and a solid surface, Phys. Rev. B13, 2270 (1976)

    1976

  64. [72]

    Zaremba and W

    E. Zaremba and W. Kohn, Theory of helium adsorption on simple and noble-metal surfaces, Phys. Rev. B15, 1769 (1977)

    1977

  65. [73]

    Harris and A

    J. Harris and A. Liebsch, Interaction of helium with a metal surface, J. Phys. C15, 2275 (1982)

    1982

  66. [74]

    Nordlander and J

    P. Nordlander and J. Harris, The interaction of helium with smooth metal surfaces, J. Phys. C17, 1141 (1984)

    1984

  67. [75]

    Andersson and M

    S. Andersson and M. Persson, Sticking in the physisorp- tion well: Influence of surface structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 202 (1993)

    1993

  68. [76]

    K. Lee, K. Berland, M. Yoon, S. Andersson, E. Schr¨ oder, P. Hyldgaard, and B. I. Lundqvist, Bench- marking van der Waals density functionals with exper- imental data: potential-energy curves for H 2 molecules on Cu(111), (100), and (110) surfaces, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter2...

    2012

  69. [77]

    B. I. Lundqvist, Aspects of molecule-surface interac- tions, Surf. Sci242, 365 (1991)

    1991

  70. [78]

    ¨Osterlund, I

    L. ¨Osterlund, I. Zori´ c, and B. Kasemo, Dissociative sticking of O 2 on Al(111), Phys. Rev. B55, 15452 (1997)

    1997

  71. [79]

    L. J. Lauhon and W. Ho, Direct Observation of the Quantum Tunneling of Single Hydrogen Atoms with a Scanning Tunneling Microscope, Phys. Rev. Lett85, 4566 (2000)

    2000

  72. [80]

    L. J. Lauhon and W. Ho, Erratum: Direct Observa- tion of the Quantum Tunneling of Single Hydrogen Atoms with a Scanning Tunneling Microscope [Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900785, 4566 (2000)], Phys. Rev. Lett89, 079901 (2002)

    2000

  73. [81]

    J. Repp, G. Meyer, K.-H. Rieder, and P. Hyldgaard, Site Determination and Thermally Assisted Tunneling in Homogeneous Nucleation, Phys. Rev. Lett91, 206102 (2003). 18

    2003

  74. [82]

    Seidl, A

    A. Seidl, A. G¨ orling, P. Vogl, J. A. Majewski, and M. Levy, Generalized Kohn-Sham schemes and the band-gap problem, Phys. Rev. B53, 3764 (1996)

    1996

  75. [83]

    Burke, Perspective on density functional theory, J

    K. Burke, Perspective on density functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.136, 150901 (2012)

    2012

  76. [84]

    A. D. Becke, Perspective: Fifty years of density- functional theory in chemical physics, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 18A301 (2014)

    2014

  77. [85]

    Burke and L

    K. Burke and L. O. Wagner, DFT in a nutshell, Int. J. Quantum Chem.113, 96 (2013)

    2013

  78. [86]

    Y. Y. Chuang, M. L. Radhakrishnan, P. L. Fast, C. J. Cramer, and D. G. Truhlar, Direct Dynamics for Free Radical Kinetics in Solution: Solvent Effect on the Rate Constant for the Reaction of Methanol with Atomic Hy- drogen, J. Phys. Chem. A103, 4893–4909 (1999)

    1999

  79. [87]

    Berland, C

    K. Berland, C. A. Arter, V. R. Cooper, K. Lee, B. I. Lundqvist, E. Schr¨ oder, T. Thonhauser, and P. Hyldgaard, van der Waals density functionals built upon the electron-gas tradition: Facing the challenge of competing interactions, J. Chem. Phys.140, 18A539 (2014)

    2014

  80. [88]

    Shukla, Y

    V. Shukla, Y. Jiao, J.-H. Lee, E. Schr¨ oder, J. B. Neaton, and P. Hyldgaard, Accurate Nonempirical Range-Separated Hybrid van der Waals Density Func- tional for Complex Molecular Problems, Solids, and Surfaces, Phys. Rev. X12, 041003 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Linear response ap- proach to the calculation of the effective interaction pa- rameters in the LDA + U method, Phys. Rev. B71, 035105 (2005)

    2005

  82. [90]

    Kuisma, J

    M. Kuisma, J. Ojanen, J. Enkovaara, and T. T. Rantala, Kohn-Sham potential with discontinuity for band gap materials, Phys. Rev. B82, 115106 (2010)

    2010

  83. [91]

    Ma and L.-W

    J. Ma and L.-W. Wang, Using Wannier functions to improve solid band gap predictions in density functional theory, Sci. Rep.6, 24924 (2016)

    2016

  84. [92]

    N. L. Nguyen, G. Borghi, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, First-Principles Photoemission Spectroscopy of DNA and RNA Nucleobases from Koopmans-Compliant Functionals, J. Chem. Theory Comput.12, 3948 (2016)

    2016

  85. [93]

    Colonna, R

    N. Colonna, R. De Gennaro, E. Linscott, and N. Marzari, Koopmans spectral functionals in periodic boundary conditions, J. Chem. Theory Comput.18, 5435 (2022)

    2022

  86. [94]

    Camarasa-G´ omez, S

    M. Camarasa-G´ omez, S. E. Gant, G. Ohad, J. B. Neaton, A. Ramasubramaniam, and L. Kronik, Excita- tions in layered materials from a non-empirical Wannier- localized optimally-tuned screened ranged-separated hybrid functional, npj Comput. Mater.10, 1 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Quintero-Monsebaiz, P

    R. Quintero-Monsebaiz, P. Hyldgaard, and E. Schr¨ oder, Nature of frontier quasi-particle states in nitrogen-base systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.28, 3336 (2026)

    2026

  88. [96]

    R. A. Olsen, P. H. T. Philipsen, and E. J. Baerends, CO on Pt (111): A puzzle revisited, J. Chem. Phys.119, 4522 (2003)

    2003

  89. [97]

    Shukla, Y

    V. Shukla, Y. Jiao, C. M. Frostenson, and P. Hyldgaard, vdW-DF-ahcx: a range-separated van der Waals den- sity functional hybrid, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter34, 025902 (2022)

    2022

  90. [98]

    Yourdshahyan, B

    Y. Yourdshahyan, B. Razaznejad, and B. I. Lundqvist, Adiabatic potential-energy surfaces for oxygen on Al(111), Phys. Rev. B65, 075416 (2002)

    2002

  91. [99]

    Hellman, B

    A. Hellman, B. Razaznejad, and B. I. Lundqvist, Trends in sticking and adsorption of diatomic molecules on the Al(111) surface, Phys. Rev. B71, 205424 (2005)

    2005

  92. [100]

    R. Yin, Y. Zhang, F. Libisch, E. A. Carter, H. Guo, and B. Jiang, Dissociative Chemisorption of O 2 on Al(111): Dynamics on a Correlated Wave-Function-Based Poten- tial Energy Surface, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 3271 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    Schimka, J

    L. Schimka, J. Harl, A. Stroppa, A. Gr¨ uneis, M. Mars- man, F. Mittendorfer, and G. Kresse, Accurate surface and adsorption energies from many-body perturbation theory, Nat. Mater.9, 741 (2010)

    2010

  94. [102]

    X. Ren, A. Tkatchenko, P. Rinke, and M. Scheffler, Be- yond the random-phase approximation for the electron correlation energy: The importance of single excita- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 153003 (2011)

    2011

  95. [103]

    Hyldgaard, K

    P. Hyldgaard, K. Berland, and E. Schr¨ oder, Interpreta- tion of van der Waals density functionals, Phys. Rev. B 90, 075148 (2014)

    2014

  96. [104]

    Ma and K

    S.-K. Ma and K. A. Brueckner, Correlation energy of an electron gas with a slowly varying high density, Phys. Rev.165, 18 (1968)

    1968

  97. [105]

    K. S. Singwi, M. P. Tosi, R. H. Land, and A. Sj¨ olander, Electron correlations at metallic densities, Phys. Rev. 176, 589 (1968)

    1968

  98. [106]

    K. S. Singwi, A. Sj¨ olander, M. P. Tosi, and R. H. Land, Electron Correlations at Metallic Densities – III, Sol. State Commun.7, 1503 (1969)

    1969

  99. [107]

    K. S. Singwi, A. Sj¨ olander, M. P. Tosi, and R. H. Land, Electron Correlations at Metallic Densities. IV, Phys. Rev. B1, 1044 (1970)

    1970

  100. [108]

    Rasolt and D

    M. Rasolt and D. J. W. Geldart, Gradient corrections in the exchange and correlation energy of an inhomoge- neous electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1234 (1975)

    1975

  101. [109]

    D. C. Langreth and S. H. Vosko, Exact electron-gas re- sponse functions at high density, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 497 (1987)

    1987

  102. [110]

    Thonhauser, V

    T. Thonhauser, V. R. Cooper, S. Li, A. Puzder, P. Hyldgaard, and D. C. Langreth, van der Waals den- sity functional: Self-consistent potential and the nature of the van der Waals bond, Phys. Rev. B.76, 125112 (2007)

    2007

  103. [111]

    J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Accurate and simple den- sity functional for the electronic exchange energy: Gen- eralized gradient approximation, Phys. Rev. B33, 8800 (1986)

    1986

  104. [112]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and Y. Wang, Generalized gra- dient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system, Phys. Rev. B54, 16533 (1996)

    1996

  105. [113]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  106. [114]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vy- drov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  107. [115]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly con- strained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  108. [116]

    Peng, Z.-H

    H. Peng, Z.-H. Yang, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, Versatile van der Waals Density Functional Based on a Meta- Generalized Gradient Approximation, Phys. Rev. X6, 041005 (2016)

    2016

  109. [117]

    Andersson, D

    Y. Andersson, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, van der Waals Interactions in Density-Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 102 (1996). 19

    1996

  110. [118]

    M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schr¨ oder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 246401 (2004)

    2004

  111. [119]

    Berland, V

    K. Berland, V. R. Cooper, K. Lee, E. Schr¨ oder, T. Thonhauser, P. Hyldgaard, and B. I. Lundqvist, van der Waals forces in density functional theory: A review of the vdW-DF method, Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 066501 (2015)

    2015

  112. [120]

    Thonhauser, S

    T. Thonhauser, S. Zuluaga, C. A. Arter, K. Berland, E. Schr¨ oder, and P. Hyldgaard, Spin Signature of Nonlo- cal Correlation Binding in Metal-Organic Frameworks, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 136402 (2015)

    2015

  113. [121]

    Berland, Y

    K. Berland, Y. Jiao, J.-H. Lee, T. Rangel, J. B. Neaton, and P. Hyldgaard, Assessment of two hybrid van der Waals density functionals for covalent and non-covalent binding of molecules, J. Chem. Phys.146, 234106 (2017)

    2017

  114. [122]

    Burke, M

    K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, and J. P. Perdew, The adi- abatic connection method: a non-empirical hybrid, Chem. Phys. Lett.265, 115 (1997)

    1997

  115. [123]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone, Towards reliable density func- tional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, J. Chem. Phys.110, 6158 (1999)

    1999

  116. [124]

    Z. Wei, J. M. P. Martirez, and E. A. Carter, Introducing the embedded random phase approximation: H2 disso- ciative adsorption on Cu(111) as an examplar, J. Chem. Phys.159, 194108 (2023)

    2023

  117. [125]

    Oudot and K

    B. Oudot and K. Doblhoff-Dier, Reaction barriers at metal surfaces computed using the random phase ap- proximation: Can we beat DFT in the generalized gra- dient approximations?, J. Chem. Phys.161, 054708 (2024)

    2024

  118. [126]

    Tchakoua, N

    T. Tchakoua, N. Gerrits, E. W. F. Smeets, and G.-J. Kroes, SBH17: Benchmark Database of Barrier Heights for Dissociative Chemisorption on Transition Metal Sur- faces, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 245 (2023)

    2023

  119. [127]

    K. Lee, `E. D. Murray, L. Kong, B. I. Lundqvist, and D. C. Langreth, Higher-accuracy van der Waals density functional, Phys. Rev. B82, 081101(R) (2010)

    2010

  120. [128]

    Hamada, van der Waals density functional made ac- curate, Phys

    I. Hamada, van der Waals density functional made ac- curate, Phys. Rev. B89, 121103(R) (2014)

    2014

  121. [129]

    A. D. Becke, On the large-gradient behavior of the den- sity functional exchange energy, J. Chem. Phys.85, 7184 (1986)

    1986

  122. [130]

    P. J. Feibelman, B. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov, F. Wagner, M. Scheffler, R. Stumpf, R. Watwe, and J. Dumesic, The CO/Pt(111) puzzle, J. Phys. Chem. B105, 4018 (2001)

    2001

  123. [131]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid func- tionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  124. [132]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Erratum: ”Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb po- tential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)], J. Chem. Phys.124, 219906 (2006)

    2003

  125. [133]

    T. M. Henderson, B. G. Janesko, and G. E. Scusseria, Generalized gradient approximation model exchange holes for range-separated hybrids, J. Chem. Phys128, 194105 (2008)

    2008

  126. [134]

    D. Lee, F. Furche, and K. Burke, Accuracy of Electron Affinities of Atoms in Approximate Density Functional Theory, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.1, 2124 (2010)

    2010

  127. [135]

    Kronik, T

    L. Kronik, T. Stein, S. Refaely-Abramson, and R. Baer, Excitation Gaps of Finite-Sized Systems from Opti- mally Tuned Range-Separated Hybrid Functionals, J. Chem. Theory Comput.8, 1515 (2012)

    2012

  128. [136]

    R. J. L. Roy, Determining potential energy constants for atom- and molecule-surface interactions, Surf. Sci.59, 541 (1976)

    1976

  129. [137]

    K. Lee, B. Kolb, T. Thonhauser, D. Vanderbilt, and D. C. Langreth, Structure and energetics of a ferroelec- tric organic crystal of phenazine and chloranilic acid, Phys. Rev. B86, 104102 (2012)

    2012

  130. [138]

    Berland and P

    K. Berland and P. Hyldgaard, Exchange functional that tests the robustness of the plasmon description of the van der Waals density functional, Phys. Rev. B89, 035412 (2014)

    2014

  131. [139]

    Perrichon, E

    A. Perrichon, E. J. Granhed, G. Romanelli, A. Pio- vano, A. Lindman, P. Hyldgaard, G. Wahnstr¨ om, and M. Karlsson, Unraveling the Ground-State Structure of BaZrO3 by Neutron Scattering Experiments and First- Principles Calculations, Chem. Mater.32, 2824 (2020)

    2020

  132. [140]

    E. J. Granhed, G. Wahnstr¨ om, and P. Hyldgaard, BaZrO3 stability under pressure: The role of nonlocal exchange and correlation, Phys. Rev. B101, 224105 (2020)

    2020

  133. [141]

    C. M. Frostenson, E. J. Granhed, V. Shukla, P. A. T. Olsson, E. Schr¨ oder, and P. Hyldgaard, Hard and soft materials: Putting consistent van der Waals density functionals to work, Electron. Struct.4, 014001 (2022)

    2022

  134. [142]

    J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B23, 5048 (1981)

    1981

  135. [143]

    Y. Jiao, E. Schr¨ oder, and P. Hyldgaard, Signatures of van der Waals binding: a coupling-constant scaling analysis, Phys. Rev. B97, 085115 (2018)

    2018

  136. [144]

    Ferretti, I

    A. Ferretti, I. Dabo, M. Cococcioni, and N. Marzari, Bridging density-functional and many-body perturba- tion theory: Orbital-density dependence in electronic- structure functionals, Phys. Rev. B89, 195134 (2014)

    2014

  137. [145]

    Colonna, N

    N. Colonna, N. L. Nguyen, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Screening in Orbital-Density-Dependent Functionals, J. Chem. Theory Comput.14, 2549 (2018)

    2018

  138. [146]

    N. L. Nguyen, N. Colonna, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Koopmans-Compliant Spectral Functionals for Ex- tended Systems, Phys. Rev. X8, 021051 (2018)

    2018

  139. [147]

    De Gennaro, N

    R. De Gennaro, N. Colonna, E. Linscott, and N. Marzari, Bloch’s theorem in orbital-density- dependent functionals: Band structures from Koop- mans spectral functionals, Phys. Rev. B106, 035106 (2022)

    2022

  140. [148]

    E. B. Linscott, N. Colonna, R. De Gennaro, N. L. Nguyen, G. Borghi, A. Ferretti, I. Dabo, and N. Marzari, koopmans: An Open Source Package for Ac- curately and Efficiently Predicting Spectral Properties with Koopmans Functionals, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 7097 (2023)

    2023

  141. [149]

    M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schr¨ oder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Erratum: Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries [Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 246401 (2004)], Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 109902(E) (2005)

    2004

  142. [150]

    Ernzerhof and J

    M. Ernzerhof and J. P. Perdew, Generalized gradient approximation to the angle- and system-averaged ex- change hole, J. Chem. Phys.109, 3313 (1998)

    1998

  143. [151]

    Goerigk, A

    L. Goerigk, A. Hansen, C. Bauer, S. Ehrlich, A. Najibi, and S. Grimme, A look at the density functional theory zoo with the advanced GMTKN55 database for gen- 20 eral main group thermochemistry, kinetics and nonco- valent interactions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 32184 (2017)

    2017

  144. [152]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Giron- coli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerst- mann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F...

    2009

  145. [153]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Collonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delu- gas, R. A. DiStasio Jr, A. Feretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugalio, R. G...

    2017

  146. [154]

    Lin, Adaptively Compressed Exchange Operator, J

    L. Lin, Adaptively Compressed Exchange Operator, J. Chem. Theory Comput.12, 2242 (2016)

    2016

  147. [155]

    Carnimeo, S

    I. Carnimeo, S. Baroni, and P. Giannozzi, Fast hybrid density-functional computations using plane-wave bea- sis sets, Electron. Struct.1, 015009 (2019)

    2019

  148. [156]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  149. [157]

    Schlipf and F

    M. Schlipf and F. Gygi, Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials, Comput. Phys. Commun.196, 36 (2015)

    2015

  150. [158]

    Gharaee, P

    L. Gharaee, P. Erhart, and P. Hyldgaard, Finite- temperature properties of non-magnetic transition met- als: Comparison of the performance of constraint-based semi and nonlocal functionals, Phys. Rev. B95, 085147 (2017)

    2017

  151. [159]

    G¨ orling and M

    A. G¨ orling and M. Levy, Correlation-energy functional and its high-density limit obtained from a coupling- constant perturbation expansion, Phys. Rev. B47, 13105 (1993)

    1993

  152. [160]

    Y. Jiao, E. Schr¨ oder, and P. Hyldgaard, Extent of Fock- exchange mixing for a hybrid van der Waals density functional?, J. Chem. Phys.148, 194115 (2018)

    2018

  153. [161]

    J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Accurate and simple ana- lytic representation of the electron-gas correlation en- ergy, Phys. Rev. B45, 13244 (1992)

    1992

  154. [162]

    J.-H. Lee, P. Hyldgaard, and J. B. Neaton, An as- sessment of density functionals for predicting CO 2 ad- sorption in diamine-functionalized metal-organic frame- works, J. Chem. Phys.156, 154113 (2022)

    2022

  155. [163]

    D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, The exchange- correlation energy of a metallic surface, Solid State Commun.17, 1425 (1975)

    1975

  156. [164]

    D. C. Langreth and M. J. Mehl, Easily Imple- mentable Nonlocal Exchange-Correlation Energy Func- tional, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 446 (1981)

    1981

  157. [165]

    Rydberg, M

    H. Rydberg, M. Dion, N. Jacobson, E. Schr¨ oder, P. Hyldgaard, S. I. Simak, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Van der Waals Density Functional for Lay- ered Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 126402 (2003)

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.