Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

A hybrid quantum-classical algorithm called ON-VQE claims that accurate molecular energies can be obtained from measured occupation numbers alone, reducing VQE's measurement cost from O(M^4) to O(M/2).

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 23:23 UTC pith:DEIWTCOJ

load-bearing objection ON-VQE is a genuine but incremental step: a clean single-QWC measurement trick for NOF energies, with a load-bearing unverified assumption about the orbital basis diagonalizing the 1RDM. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15425 v1 pith:DEIWTCOJ submitted 2026-07-16 physics.chem-ph

Electronic Structure Calculations from Occupation Numbers on Quantum Computers

Edison X. Salazar , Juan Felipe Huan Lew-Yee , and Mario Piris This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords occupation numbersnatural orbital functionalvariational quantum eigensolverreduced density matrixqubit-wise commuting measurementmeasurement cost reductionquantum hardwarestrong correlation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

ON-VQE is a hybrid quantum-classical scheme whose thesis is that the quantum computer only needs to deliver occupation numbers, not the Hamiltonian expectation value or the full one-particle density matrix. In the natural orbital basis, each occupation number equals 1/2(1 - ), a local single-qubit observable, and all such observables commute, so a single measurement setting gives all the data the energy needs. The paper argues this reduces the measurement cost of VQE from O(M^4) to O(M/2) while keeping energies close to conventional VQE, and supports the argument with noiseless simulations of seven small molecules and with quantum-hardware results for the dissociation curve of cubic H8. If the scheme holds, near-term quantum devices can spend their limited shots on precision rather than on measuring many noncommuting Hamiltonian terms, and classical improvements in natural orbital functionals can be adopted without changing the quantum workflow.

Core claim

The central claim is that accurate electronic energies can be extracted from occupation numbers alone, without ever reconstructing a reduced density matrix or measuring the Hamiltonian. The paper identifies the occupation number n_i with the expectation value of a single local Z operator, n_i = 1/2(1 - <Z_i>), a simplification that follows from the Jordan-Wigner transform once the one-particle RDM is diagonal in the natural orbital basis. Because these operators are diagonal in the computational basis, all occupations lie in a single qubit-wise commuting measurement group, and with a pair-double-excitation ansatz all occupation numbers are read from one collection of bitstrings. The authors

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the occupation-number identity n_i = 1/2(1 - <Z_i>), which turns each occupation into a local observable and makes the full set of occupations simultaneously measurable in one qubit-wise commuting group. Around it, the method places a natural orbital functional energy expression E_NOF[n,C] that depends only on the diagonal of the one-particle density matrix in the natural orbital basis, a pair-double-excitation ansatz that keeps the state-preparation circuit shallow while generating the needed occupations, and a self-consistent classical optimization of the orbital coefficient matrix C. The NOF supplies the correlation energy classically; the quantum circuit is res

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, stated where the paper says the NOs are 'determined self-consistently' (Algorithm 1), is that the classically optimized orbital coefficient matrix exactly diagonalizes the measured one-particle density matrix, so the unmeasured off-diagonal elements can be ignored and the diagonal Z expectations are true occupation numbers; if that diagonalization is imperfect, the NOF energy is evaluated with quantities that are not occupation numbers and the result

What would settle it

Measure the off-diagonal elements of the one-particle density matrix in the optimized natural orbital basis (via full 1RDM tomography) and compare them with the measured occupations; if they are non-negligible for a correlated system such as stretched H8 or N2, then ignoring them means the 'occupation numbers' are not the NOF variables and the energy is uncontrolled.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The number of measurement settings for energy evaluation drops to a single QWC group, so the entire energy can be assembled from one set of computational-basis bitstrings.
  • The same measured occupation numbers can be substituted into several NOFs without any additional quantum measurements, separating quantum data acquisition from classical energy evaluation.
  • Because occupation numbers obey known N-representability constraints, hardware errors can be corrected directly in occupation space by projection, polarization recovery, and post-selection, rather than through RDM reconstruction.
  • For spin-singlet electron-pair states, spin symmetry halves the number of distinct occupations that must be measured, giving the O(M/2) scaling.
  • The reduction in measurement overhead frees shots to be spent on statistical precision and noise resilience on near-term hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If only occupation numbers are needed, the objective for the quantum circuit could be reframed as preparing a state whose natural-occupation spectrum is correct, rather than one whose energy is directly minimized; this could simplify variational optimization and connect ON-VQE to reduced-density-matrix functional theory more broadly.
  • The O(M/2) scaling and single-QWC-group property rely on the electron-pair ansatz and NOF pair structure; for states that are not seniority-zero, the off-diagonal blocks of the 1RDM may not be negligible, and ONs alone would likely be insufficient.
  • A natural stress test is to push ON-VQE into basis sets and geometries where NOF approximations are known to lose accuracy; if discrepancies appear, they will reveal whether the error comes from the functional or from the diagonalization assumption on the measured density matrix.
  • Since the measured quantities are simple Z expectation values, the same occupation-data pipeline could in principle be applied to any state-preparation method, not only pair-correlated ansatze, provided the natural orbital basis is known.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes ON-VQE, a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that measures only single-qubit Z expectation values, which in the Jordan–Wigner representation give occupation numbers in the currently chosen orbital basis. These occupations are fed into a natural orbital functional (NOF), which is evaluated classically together with a self-consistently optimized orbital matrix C. The quantum circuit is a unitary pair-double-excitation ansatz (UpCCD). The authors claim that this reduces the measurement overhead from O(M^4) to O(M/2) measurement settings, validate the method on small molecules in STO-3G, and report a hardware demonstration on the cubic H8 cluster with post-selection.

Significance. If the central premise is correct, the reduction of the measurement problem to a single qubit-wise-commuting group of Z operators is a practically important step for NOF-based quantum algorithms. The derivation of n_p = (1 - <Z_p>)/2 is correct and the workflow is clearly presented. The idea of performing error mitigation directly in occupation-number space is original and appealing. However, the paper does not establish that the self-consistently optimized orbital basis is actually the natural-orbital basis of the prepared state, and the numerical demonstrations are mostly in a regime where all tested NOFs coincide. The hardware validation is also statistically under-reported. These issues prevent the paper from fully supporting its headline claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4) and Algorithm 1] The central measurement target is not established. Eq. (4) is correct, but it gives the population of spin-orbital p in the current basis C, not necessarily the natural occupation. Algorithm 1 measures only <Z_p> and evaluates E_NOF[n,C]; the objective contains no off-diagonal 1-RDM element, so the ADAM update of C has no mechanism to drive <a†_p a_q> (p≠q) to zero. For the unitary state generated by Eq. (8), off-diagonal 1-RDM elements are generically nonzero unless C is exactly the natural-orbital basis. The manuscript asserts that C is 'determined self-consistently' but never verifies diagonality. A concrete test is to compute <a†_p a_q + h.c.> in the optimized basis for a nontrivial system, or to add a penalty/constraint that enforces diagonality; without this, the measured quantities are not necessarily occupation numbers and the NOF energy is uncontrolled.
  2. [Table I and Fig. S1] The numerical validation does not support the accuracy claim. Table I uses only STO-3G with Ng≤2, where each electron-pair subspace has at most one weakly occupied orbital and n_p = 1 - n_g, so all tested NOFs reduce to very similar expressions. The article itself concedes this. Fig. S1 validates the noiseless ON-VQE implementation against the same PNOF7 functional used in the energy evaluation, which checks code consistency, not physical accuracy. A meaningful validation should include at least one system with Ng≥3 or a larger basis, and should compare against FCI/CCSD or conventional VQE energies, not only against the same NOF.
  3. [Measurement-cost claim] The O(M/2) claim counts QWC groups or the number of independently measured observables, but the total shot cost is not analyzed. All occupations share a single QWC group, but the number of shots required to reach a given precision depends on the variance of <Z_p>, which is not discussed. The comparison of 1198 groups vs 1 group is striking, but the manuscript should define the cost metric explicitly and provide a sampling-error analysis; otherwise the headline 'measurement cost' reduction is ambiguous and could be misleading.
  4. [Hardware results and Fig. 3] Figure 3 reports no error bars, and each point is the average of only ten post-selected hardware executions. The mitigation protocol in Table SI involves numerous tuned parameters (k_sigma, pair-sum tolerance, maximum ON/pair corrections, polarization thresholds, lambda_pol). Without cross-validation, sensitivity analysis, and reporting of the fraction of discarded samples, the agreement with the noiseless curve may be partly a result of selection bias. Please provide confidence intervals, acceptance rates, and a sensitivity study for the mitigation hyperparameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. S1] The text refers to noiseless ON-VQE, but the figure legend appears to label the curve as NOF-VQE (PNOF7). Please reconcile the terminology.
  2. [Eqs. (6)-(8)] The relation between the geminal parameters n_g in Eq. (6) and the variational angles theta_p^g in Eq. (8) is not specified. It is unclear whether thetas are constrained to reproduce the desired occupations or are free variational parameters.
  3. [Fig. 2] The caption, 'Representative values obtained for the largest molecular systems considered,' is incomplete. Please list the molecules, basis, and the exact number of QWC groups for each method.
  4. [Reference 36] Reference 36 points to a single Python file in a GitHub repository. A versioned release or a DOI would be preferable for reproducibility.
  5. [Algorithm 1] The step 'Infer complementary occupations from the electron-pair constraints (when applicable)' is not defined in the main text. Please specify exactly when and how this inference is applied, as it can mask measurement errors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the O(M/2) ON measurement derivation (Eqs. 1-4) is self-contained. The energy layer rests on self-authored but externally bench-marked NOFs, and the in-paper validation is a scoped consistency check rather than an independent physics test.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain contains no step that equates a predicted quantity to its input by construction. Eqs. (1)-(4) are a direct Jordan-Wigner calculation (n_i = 1/2(1 - <Z_i>) at Eq. 4); since every Z_p is a single-qubit operator, all occupation observables are trivially qubit-wise commuting, which supports the single-QWC-group and O(M/2) measurement-cost claims without any fitted parameter. The energy stage E_NOF[n,C] is a transfer of trust: ONs measured from the circuit are fed into prior NOF functionals (PNOF5, PNOF7, GNOF) whose functional forms do not contain the results of this paper. These functionals are self-authored, but the cited prior work benchmarks them against FCI (e.g., Refs. 17-20), i.e., externally falsifiable evidence outside the present paper's fitted values; under the review rules that self-citation is real evidence, not circularity. The in-paper validations are scoped honestly: Table I compares NOF energies against <H> of the same ansatz state, and Fig. S1 compares ON-VQE(PNOF7) against classical PyNOF(PNOF7), described only as showing 'the quantum implementation faithfully reproduces the classical NOF energy'; the text explicitly says 'The purpose of this benchmark is not to assess the relative performance of different NOFs.' The PyNOF agreement is therefore a necessary implementation-consistency check, not an advertised independent validation of the physics—a limitation, not a circular step. Two flagged weaknesses remain. First, the premise that the measured diagonal elements are true natural occupations relies on an unstated argument: the UpCCD ansatz is seniority-zero, and any seniority-zero state has an exactly diagonal 1RDM in the orbital basis in which its pair-excitation circuit is defined, so the never-measured off-diagonal elements vanish in the noiseless limit. The paper asserts 'the NO representation... determined self-consistently' without proving this; the premise is sound but the proof is omitted. Second, the hardware error-mitigation hyperparameters (Table SI) are selected on the same hardware dataset, and the H8 curve is not compared against FCI/CCSD; these reduce the evidential weight of the empirical demonstrations but do not make any derivation step circular. Overall, the measurement reduction is self-contained and the score stays at 2.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The computational core adds no invented entities. It relies on standard fermionic mapping, on the accuracy of published NOF approximations (largely from the same group), on an unverified assumption that the optimized orbital basis diagonalizes the measured 1RDM, and on a seniority-zero ansatz. The only hand-fitted quantities are the hardware error-mitigation thresholds.

free parameters (6)
  • Trust-region k_sigma = 3.5
    Hand-set threshold for accepting polarization corrections; tuned for hardware runs, not derived.
  • Pair-sum tolerance = 0.05
    Threshold for accepting post-selected ON configurations in the error-mitigation protocol.
  • Maximum ON correction = 0.10
    Cap on per-occupation correction during occupation-space error mitigation.
  • Maximum pair correction = 0.10
    Cap on per-pair polarization correction.
  • Polarization thresholds = 0.25, 0.60
    Hand-set polarization bins (strong/intermediate/high) that select the recovery factor lambda_pol.
  • Polarization recovery factor lambda_pol = 1.00, 1.05, 1.10
    Adaptive rescaling factors chosen to make hardware PEC match the noiseless reference.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner mapping represents fermionic operators faithfully and the number operator reduces to (1-Z_i)/2.
    Eqs. (2)-(4); standard and machine-independent.
  • domain assumption PNOF5/PNOF7/GNOF are adequate energy functionals for the tested systems.
    Inherited from prior literature; no benchmark against FCI except H8 PyNOF using the same functional.
  • ad hoc to paper The classically optimized orbital matrix C diagonalizes the measured 1RDM, so diagonal measurements are true occupation numbers.
    Algorithm 1 optimizes C with ADAM to minimize E_NOF[n,C] but never measures or verifies off-diagonal 1RDM elements.
  • domain assumption The seniority-zero, pair-double-excitation subspace (UpCCD/PNOF5 geminal form) spans the relevant electron correlation.
    Ansatz Eq. (8) is restricted to double excitations within pair subspaces; no guarantee for general strongly correlated systems.
  • domain assumption Noiseless quantum state occupations automatically satisfy N-representability.
    True in the noiseless limit; hardware requires projection onto the constraints in Eqs. (9)-(10).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9940 in / 13845 out tokens · 147326 ms · 2026-08-01T23:23:46.334347+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a quantum-classical algorithm for electronic structure calculations that dramatically reduces the quantum measurement cost of variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) approaches. While conventional VQE methods require measurements scaling as O(M^4) with system size M, the proposed occupation-number VQE (ON-VQE) reduces this cost to O(M/2) by avoiding reduced density matrix (RDM) measurements and relying exclusively on ONs. The method exploits only the diagonal elements of the one-particle RDM in the natural orbital representation, where occupations are obtained directly from computational-basis measurement outcomes. By restricting the variational ansatz to double excitations within orbital subspaces associated with electron pairs, the required measurements can be grouped into a small number of qubit-wise commuting observables, yielding an efficient and scalable measurement strategy. The approach is validated through simulations and executions on quantum hardware for the cubic H$_8$ cluster, demonstrating the feasibility of extracting accurate ONs from quantum measurements and evaluating electronic energies within the natural orbital functional (NOF) framework. Across representative molecular systems, the extracted ONs enable accurate energy evaluation with state-of-the-art NOFs while maintaining a dramatically reduced measurement cost. These results establish a scalable route toward quantum simulation of strongly correlated electronic systems, demonstrating that accurate electronic energies can be obtained from quantum measurements of ONs alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15425 by and Mario Piris, Edison X. Salazar, Juan Felipe Huan Lew-Yee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of the computational workflows employed in VQE, NOF-VQE, and ON-VQE. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Representative values obtained for the largest molecular sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Potential energy curve of the cubic H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Harville , author R

    author author T. Harville , author R. Khurana , author V. F. \ Grizzi ,\ and\ author C. Liu ,\ title title Recent Developments in VQE: Survey and Benchmarking ,\ journal journal arXiv: 2602.11384 \ ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Cao , author J

    author author Y. Cao , author J. Romero , author J. P. \ Olson , author M. Degroote , author P. D. \ Johnson , author M. Kieferov \' a , author I. D. \ Kivlichan , author T. Menke , author B. Peropadre , author N. P. D. \ Sawaya , author S. Sim , author L. Veis ,\ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ title title Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing...

    doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 2019

  3. [3]

    author author S. E. \ Smart \ and\ author D. A. \ Mazziotti ,\ title title Quantum Solver of Contracted Eigenvalue Equations for Scalable Molecular Simulations on Quantum Computing Devices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.070504 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 126 ,\ pages 070504 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.070504 2021

  4. [4]

    Garrett , author M

    author author N. Garrett , author M. Rose ,\ and\ author D. A. \ Mazziotti ,\ title title Size-Consistent Quantum Chemistry on Quantum Computers ,\ journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 1892 ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18395 2512.18395 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Tilly , author P

    author author J. Tilly , author P. V. \ Sriluckshmy , author A. Patel , author E. Fontana , author I. Rungger , author E. Grant , author R. Anderson , author J. Tennyson ,\ and\ author G. H. \ Booth ,\ title title Reduced density matrix sampling: Self-consistent embedding and multiscale electronic structure on current generation quantum computers ,\ https...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033230 2021

  6. [6]

    author author T. L. \ Gilbert ,\ title title Hohenberg-Kohn theorem for nonlocal external potentials ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.12.2111 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 12 ,\ pages 2111 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.12.2111 1975

  7. [7]

    author author S. M. \ Valone ,\ title title Consequences of extending 1 matrix energy functionals pure-state representable to all ensemble representable 1 matrices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.440249 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 1344 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.440249 1980

  8. [8]

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Advances in Approximate Natural Orbital Functionals: From Historical Perspectives to Contemporary Developments ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiq.2024.04.002 journal journal Adv. Quantum Chem. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 15 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/bs.aiq.2024.04.002 2024

  9. [9]

    Piris ,\ title title Exploring the potential of natural orbital functionals ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc05810k journal journal Chem

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Exploring the potential of natural orbital functionals ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc05810k journal journal Chem. Sci. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 17284 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    doi:10.1039/d4sc05810k 2024

  10. [10]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee , author I. Mitxelena , author J. M. \ del Campo ,\ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title DoNOF 2.0: A modern open-source electronic structure program for natural orbital functionals ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0316927 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 164 ,\ pages 072501 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0316927 2026

  11. [11]

    Piris , author X

    author author M. Piris , author X. Lopez , author F. Ruip \' e rez , author J. M. \ Matxain ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Ugalde ,\ title title A natural orbital functional for multiconfigurational states. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3582792 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 164102 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.3582792 2011

  12. [12]

    Piris ,\ title title Global Method for Electron Correlation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.063002 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Global Method for Electron Correlation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.063002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 063002 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.063002 2017

  13. [13]

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Global Natural Orbital Functional: Towards the Complete Description of the Electron Correlation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.233001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 233001 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.233001 2021

  14. [14]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee , author M. Piris ,\ and\ author J. M. del Campo ,\ title title Outstanding improvement in removing the delocalization error by global natural orbital functional ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0137378 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 158 ,\ pages 084110 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/5.0137378 2023

  15. [15]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee , author I. A. \ Bonfil-Rivera , author M. Piris ,\ and\ author J. M. \ del Campo ,\ title title Excited States by Coupling Piris Natural Orbital Functionals with the Extended Random-Phase Approximation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01194 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 2140 ( year 2024...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01194 2024

  16. [16]

    Mitxelena , author J

    author author I. Mitxelena , author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee ,\ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title 5- and 6-membered rings: A natural orbital functional study ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01861 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comp. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2799 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01861 2026

  17. [17]

    Mitxelena \ and\ author M

    author author I. Mitxelena \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title An efficient method for strongly correlated electrons in one dimension ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab6d11 journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter \ volume 32 ,\ pages 17LT01 ( year 2020 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab6d11 2020

  18. [18]

    Mitxelena \ and\ author M

    author author I. Mitxelena \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title An efficient method for strongly correlated electrons in two-dimensions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140985 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 152 ,\ pages 064108 ( year 2020 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5140985 2020

  19. [19]

    Mitxelena \ and\ author M

    author author I. Mitxelena \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Benchmarking GNOF against FCI in challenging systems in one, two, and three dimensions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092611 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 156 ,\ pages 214102 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0092611 2022

  20. [20]

    Mitxelena \ and\ author M

    author author I. Mitxelena \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Assessing the global natural orbital functional approximation on model systems with strong correlation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0207325 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 160 ,\ pages 204106 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0207325 2024

  21. [21]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee , author J. M. del Campo ,\ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Advancing natural orbital functional calculations through deep learning-inspired techniques for large-scale strongly correlated electron systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.206401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 206401 ( y...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.206401 2025

  22. [22]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Metal-insulator transition described by natural orbital functional theory ,\ journal journal Rev. Cubana de Fis. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 12 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

    2025

  23. [23]

    Motta , author W

    author author M. Motta , author W. Kirby , author I. Liepuoniute , author K. J. \ Sung , author J. Cohn , author A. Mezzacapo , author K. Klymko , author N. Nguyen , author N. Yoshioka ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Rice ,\ title title Subspace methods for electronic structure simulations on quantum computers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1075/ad3592 journal jo...

    doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ad3592 2024

  24. [24]

    Patel , author P

    author author S. Patel , author P. Jayakumar , author R. Huang , author T. Zeng ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Izmaylov ,\ title title Quantum Seniority-Based Subspace Expansion: Linear Combinations of Short-Circuit Unitary Transformations for the Electronic Structure Problem ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00017 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ vo...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00017 2026

  25. [25]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Efficient Energy Measurement of Chemical Systems via One-Particle Reduced Density Matrix: A NOF-VQE Approach for Optimized Sampling ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01734 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comp. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 2402 ( year 2025 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01734 2025

  26. [26]

    Piris ,\ title title The electron pairing approach in NOF Theory ,\ in\ booktitle Quantum Chemistry at the Dawn of the 21st Century

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title The electron pairing approach in NOF Theory ,\ in\ booktitle Quantum Chemistry at the Dawn of the 21st Century. Series: Innovations in Computational Chemistry ,\ editor edited by\ editor R. Carb \' o -Dorca \ and\ editor T. Chakraborty \ ( publisher Apple Academic Press ,\ year 2018 )\ Chap. chapter 22 , pp.\ pages 59...

    2018

  27. [27]

    Piris , author J

    author author M. Piris , author J. M. \ Matxain ,\ and\ author X. Lopez ,\ title title The intrapair electron correlation in natural orbital functional theory ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4844075 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 139 ,\ pages 234109 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4844075 2013

  28. [28]

    Piris ,\ title title Interpair electron correlation by second-order perturbative corrections to PNOF5 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817946 journal journal J

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Interpair electron correlation by second-order perturbative corrections to PNOF5 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817946 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 139 ,\ pages 064111 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4817946 2013

  29. [29]

    Mitxelena , author M

    author author I. Mitxelena , author M. Rodr \' i guez-Mayorga ,\ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Phase Dilemma in Natural Orbital Functional Theory from the N-representability Perspective ,\ https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2018-90078-8 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 109 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2018-90078-8 2018

  30. [30]

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Dynamic electron-correlation energy in the natural-orbital-functional second-order-M ller-Plesset method from the orbital-invariant perturbation theory ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022504 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 022504 ( year 2018 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022504 2018

  31. [31]

    author author J. F. H. \ Lew-Yee , author J. M. del Campo ,\ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Electron Correlation in the Iron(II) Porphyrin by Natural Orbital Functional Approximations ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01093 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 211 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01093 2023

  32. [32]

    Rivero-Santamaría \ and\ author M

    author author A. Rivero-Santamaría \ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title title Time evolution of natural orbitals in ab initio molecular dynamics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0188491 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 160 ,\ pages 071102 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0188491 2024

  33. [33]

    Piris , author X

    author author M. Piris , author X. Lopez ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Ugalde ,\ title title Time-resolved chemical bonding structure evolution by direct-dynamics chemical simulations ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03010 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 12138 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03010 2024

  34. [34]

    Piris ,\ title title Natural orbital functional for multiplets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032508 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Piris ,\ title title Natural orbital functional for multiplets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032508 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 100 ,\ pages 32508 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032508 2019

  35. [35]

    author author P. R. \ Surjan ,\ title title An Introduction to the Theory of Geminals ,\ in\ booktitle Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 203 \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 1999 )\ pp.\ pages 63--88 NoStop

    1999

  36. [36]

    author author E. X. \ Salazar , author J. F. \ Huan Lew-Yee ,\ and\ author M. Piris ,\ title ON-VQE : Occupation Number Variational Quantum Eigensolver ,\ howpublished https://github.com/gatox/PennyLane_Exercises/blob/main/test_nof_vqe/NOFVQE/nofvqe.py ( year 2026 ),\ note open-source implementation NoStop

    2026

  37. [37]

    Asadi , author A

    author author A. Asadi , author A. Dusko , author C.-Y. \ Park , author V. Michaud-Rioux , author I. Schoch , author S. Shu , author T. Vincent ,\ and\ author L. J. \ O'Riordan ,\ title Hybrid quantum programming with pennylane lightning on hpc platforms ( year 2024 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02512 arXiv:2403.02512 [quant-ph] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024