Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

How Topology Shapes the Phase Behavior of Polyelectrolytes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Polymer topology alone is enough to drive multiphase coacervation of polyelectrolytes.

desk verdict Topology as a design lever is a nice idea, but the central dendrimer prediction rests on a continuum Gaussian assumption the paper itself violates. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15703 v1 pith:ACWAXO5A submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

David Beyer , Pierre J. Walker , Lena Tarrach , Zhen-Gang Wang , Christian Holm This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords polyelectrolytecoacervationliquid-liquidphaseseparationpolymertopologydendrimersstarpolymersrandomapproximationeffectivechiparametermultiphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the shape of a polyelectrolyte chain—linear, star, or dendrimer—is by itself enough to change whether and how the chain phase-separates, even when molecular weight, net charge, and monomer chemistry are held fixed. It shows that more compact topologies coacervate more readily, needing weaker electrostatic interactions and tolerating more salt. When chains of different topologies are mixed, the difference in shape can make the solution split into three coexisting phases: a dilute supernatant and two different coacervate droplets, each enriched in one topology. The paper traces this to an effective interaction parameter that grows with the squared difference between the chains' single-chain structure factors. It also finds that this topology-driven phase separation is strongest at an intermediate molecular weight, not at very small or very large chain lengths.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the single-chain structure factor—a wavenumber-resolved measure of how monomers are arranged inside one chain—computed for star and dendrimer topologies from a Gaussian-chain model. It combines a same-branch correlation term with a generating function that counts correlations between different branches, so it depends on arm number, branching generations, and edge length. This structure factor enters the random-phase-approximation free energy, turning compactness into a higher effective local charge density. The second key identity is the effective interaction parameter χ_eff = χ + (σ⁴/2)∫dk α(k)[g_i(k;T_i) − g_j(k;T_j)]², which converts differences between two topo

What would settle it

Compute the single-chain structure factor g(k) for a 200-monomer, six-arm, one-generation dendrimer in an explicit-monomer simulation with excluded volume and Coulomb interactions, and compare the peak position and height with the ideal Gaussian formula used in the paper. A significant mismatch would move the effective χ parameter and could close the predicted three-phase region; alternatively, measure coacervation binodals for linear, star, and dendrimer polyelectrolytes at equal N and charge and see whether the critical Bjerrum lengths order as predicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the center of the paper is the claim that a single-chain property—the structure factor g(k;T)—carries all the information topology contributes to electrostatically driven liquid-liquid phase separation. Using a random-phase-approximation free energy with explicit star and dendrimer structure factors, the paper finds that compactness raises local charge density and strengthens the correlations that drive coacervation: stars and dendrimers separate at weaker electrostatic coupling and higher salt than linear chains of the same length and charge. For mixtures, it derives an effective χ parameter whose extra term is proportional to the integrated squared difference between the two topologies'

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes that each branch of the dendrimer behaves like a long, flexible, non-interacting Gaussian chain; for the featured six-arm dendrimer with about 5.6 monomers per branch, that assumption is strained, and if real branch crowding or excluded volume changes the shape, the predicted ordering could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For simple and complex coacervates, more compact topologies (dendrimers before stars before linear chains) phase separate at lower Bjerrum length and survive higher salt concentrations.
  • Mixing equal-weight, equal-charge chains of sufficiently different topology can produce three coexisting phases: a dilute supernatant, a linear-rich coacervate, and a branched-rich coacervate.
  • Topology works as a design knob for coacervation that is independent of molecular weight, net charge, and monomer chemistry, because it tunes effective charge density without changing those properties.
  • The asymmetry needed to trigger topology-driven phase separation is smallest at intermediate molecular weight; very short and very long chains suppress the effect.
  • Salt screens the difference between topologies: the effective χ parameter shrinks with screening, closing the topology-driven two-phase region at high salt.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism is not limited to topology: any property that changes a chain's single-chain charge correlations—stiffness, branching, or sequence pattern—should feed into the same effective-χ formula and could drive multiphase coacervation on its own.
  • The ideal-Gaussian structure factors used here ignore excluded volume and branch-point crowding; if those effects make real dendrimers with short branches less compact than the model assumes, the predicted ordering of phase-separation propensity could weaken or reorder.
  • A direct test, which the paper itself invites, would be to simulate explicit-monomer dendrimers and stars with N=200 and compare their structure factors and coacervation binodals with the Gaussian-chain predictions.
  • The three-phase coexistence at low polymer concentration suggests that mixed-topology formulations could be used to create multi-droplet condensates with tunable composition, though the equilibrium picture would need to be checked against kinetic arrest.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a topology-specific random-phase-approximation (RPA) theory of polyelectrolyte coacervation. The free energy, Eq. (1), combines Flory–Huggins mixing with an RPA electrostatic correlation term in which the topology of each polymer species enters exclusively through the single-chain structure factor g(k;T). Using continuous-Gaussian-chain structure factors for linear chains, stars, and dendrimers at fixed N=200, the authors predict that more compact topologies have a greater propensity for liquid–liquid phase separation, both as a function of Bjerrum length and salt concentration. For mixtures of different topologies, they derive an effective χ parameter, Eq. (2), expressed as a squared difference of structure factors, and report two- and three-phase coexistence driven solely by topology differences. They also derive effective-charge-density scalings and a global phase diagram showing that topology-driven demixing is most pronounced at a finite molecular weight.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the paper offers a general and minimal design principle: polymer topology controls polyelectrolyte phase behavior independently of molecular weight, net charge, and monomer chemistry. The analytic effective-χ expression is a clean physical rationalization, and the use of closed-form structure factors plus the Clapeyron.jl implementation makes the results reproducible and machine-checkable. The framework is a natural extension of previous work by Chen et al. and could stimulate experimental and simulation work on star and dendrimer coacervates. However, the central quantitative predictions rest on continuous-Gaussian-chain structure factors for a dendrimer with edge length L≈5.6, which is outside the stated validity regime L≫1. Because the topology ordering and the multiphase coexistence are direct consequences of differences among these structure factors, the main numerical claims are not yet fully controlled by the model's own assumptions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theory; SI Eqs. (S6)–(S8); Figs. 2–3] The continuous-Gaussian-chain representation is introduced with the justification 'L≫1 for all model architectures considered.' This is not satisfied for the dendrimer featured in the paper. For T=(f=6, N_b=1, N=200), Eq. (S7) gives E=36 and Eq. (S8) gives L=N/E≈5.6. At L≈5.6, each graph edge contains only a few Kuhn segments, so excluded volume, branch-point crowding, and electrostatic stiffening can materially alter intramolecular correlations relative to the ideal continuous-chain expression Eq. (S6). Since the topology effect enters Eq. (1) only through g(k;T_i), and the three-phase region in Fig. 3(b) is driven by [g_linear(k)−g_dendrimer(k)]^2 (Eq. S29), the headline dendrimer predictions are not within the paper's own validity window. Please recompute g(k) for finite-L dendrimers using a discrete Gaussian chain or another appropriate model and re-examine Figs. 2–3.
  2. [Fig. 3(c); SI 'Large-N asymptotics'] The global phase diagram and the claimed finite-molecular-weight optimum extend to small N (N=100), where the dendrimer edge length is L≈2.8, and the small-N scaling χeff−χ∼N^{5/2} is derived from the same continuum g(k). The non-monotonic peak in Fig. 3(c) may therefore be an artifact of using structure factors outside their validity window. A discrete-chain calculation, or at least a systematic sensitivity study of the binodals as a function of L, is needed before the finite-N optimum can be regarded as a robust prediction.
  3. [Overall validation] The paper provides no comparison with simulation, experiment, or an alternative theoretical model for the single-chain structure factors, the topology ordering, or the predicted three-phase coexistence. This absence is acceptable for a purely analytic theory when the controlled approximation is satisfied, but here the approximation is violated in the featured case. A direct computation of g_dendrimer(k) for f=6, N_b=1, N=200 from coarse-grained simulation, or an exact discrete-chain formula, would be a minimal benchmark to confirm that the topology ordering and the multiphase region survive beyond the continuum ideal-chain approximation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (S7)] The formula for E is ambiguous as typeset; please add brackets, e.g., E=f[(f−1)^{N_b+1}−1]/(f−2), to make the denominator clear.
  2. [Eq. (S13)] The notation g_i(k;T_i)=N D_i(k^2 N) is confusing because g_i already denotes the full structure factor. Please rename the scaled function, e.g., to \tilde{g}_i, or explicitly state that D_i is the generalized Debye function.
  3. [Eq. (2) / Eq. (S29)] The effective χ parameter depends on the full composition through α(k). This should be stated explicitly in the main text: χeff is a composition-dependent curvature parameter, not a bare pair interaction.
  4. [Fig. 2(c)] The critical points for star topologies at low salt are indicated but not labeled numerically. Adding the critical Bjerrum lengths or salt concentrations would help readers verify the claimed ordering across topologies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: topology-specific RPA phase diagrams are computed from explicit single-chain structure factors, not fitted to the target results.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in a non-circular way. The free energy (Eq. 1) is a Flory-Huggins + RPA functional in which topology enters only through the single-chain structure factors g(k;T), computed analytically for ideal continuous Gaussian stars and dendrimers (ESI Eqs. S2-S10). These structure factors are inputs with stated model assumptions; they are not fitted to coacervation boundaries. The ordering of phase-separation propensity and the three-phase regions in Figs. 2-3 are numerical outputs of solving Eq. 1 with Clapeyron.jl; they are not imposed by ansatz or by fitting. The effective chi parameter (Eq. 2 / ESI Eq. S29) is derived by an algebraic rewriting of the second-order variation of the same RPA free energy (ESI Eqs. S21-S28), so it is a rationalization/interpretation of the model, not an independent prediction used as input. Its scaling laws (ESI Eqs. S31-S32) are also derived from the same expression, and their agreement with the computed diagrams is internal consistency, not circularity. The self-citations (e.g., Clapeyron.jl [61] by co-author Walker, and prior works of Wang/Holm) are background or tool citations; the code is provided, so they are reproducible support and do not constitute load-bearing self-citation. The conclusion explicitly calls for future simulation/experimental tests, acknowledging the predictions are not externally validated; this is a limitation, not circularity. The concern that the f=6, Nb=1 dendrimer has L=200/36 approx 5.6, violating the paper's own L>>1 condition for the continuum Gaussian model, is an internal-validity/correctness issue that could affect the quantitative phase boundaries, but it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no central claim is justified solely by an unverified self-citation chain. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters are hand-set model inputs chosen to isolate topology; none is fitted to the target phase behavior. The effective χ is derived, not postulated, and no new physical entity is introduced. The main burden is the ideal-Gaussian structure-factor assumption and the RPA truncation.

free parameters (4)
  • Polymer–solvent Flory–Huggins parameter χ_ps = 1/2
    Set to emulate a θ-solvent; not fitted to coacervation data, but it shifts absolute binodal locations.
  • Charge fraction σ = 0.2
    Assigned uniformly to every polyelectrolyte; all comparisons are made at fixed σ, so topology is isolated.
  • Degree of polymerization N = 200
    Fixed for all topologies in the main phase diagrams; N is varied in Fig. 3(c), where the finite-size maximum is part of the claim.
  • Bjerrum length for salt-added diagrams = l_B/b = 1
    Fixed to the Kuhn length for the salt-concentration phase diagrams; corresponds to a slightly weaker-than-water scenario for b≈0.5 nm, and is a control condition rather than a fitted value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption RPA free energy (Eq. 1) is an adequate thermodynamic model for weakly charged polyelectrolyte coacervation.
    The entire phase diagram depends on this functional; RPA neglects higher-order density fluctuations and is uncontrolled at σ=0.2, l_B=b.
  • domain assumption Gaussian chain statistics for all topologies, including ideal dendrimer branching (Eqs. S2–S10).
    Single-chain structure factors are the only topology-specific input; excluded volume, branch-point correlations beyond Gaussian, and electrostatic stiffening are ignored.
  • domain assumption Continuum limit L≫1 for each graph edge.
    Invoked to justify the continuous Gaussian chain; not satisfied for dendrimer (f=6, Nb=1), where L=N/E≈5.6.
  • domain assumption Incompressibility with all molecular volumes equal to b³.
    Used in the phase-coexistence calculation and in the χ_eff Hessian rewrite.
  • domain assumption Fixed charge fraction σ with no charge regulation or Manning condensation.
    Counterion condensation would alter effective σ differently for compact topologies, changing the comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How Topology Shapes the Phase Behavior of Polyelectrolytes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACWAXO5A

@misc{pith2026260715703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How Topology Shapes the Phase Behavior of Polyelectrolytes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACWAXO5A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15703}
}
abstract

We develop a topology-specific theory of polyelectrolyte coacervation using the random phase approximation and apply it to both simple and complex coacervation. Our results for stars and dendrimers show that more compact chain topologies display a greater propensity for liquid-liquid phase separation, as a function of both Bjerrum length and salt concentration. For mixtures of different topologies, we demonstrate that differences in polymer topology alone are sufficient to drive multiphase coacervation of polyelectrolytes, which we rationalize in terms of an effective $\chi$ parameter. Analysis of a simplified global phase diagram reveals that the propensity for such topology-driven phase separation is largest at a finite molecular weight. Overall, our results establish polymer topology as a powerful design lever for tuning the phase diagram of charged macromolecules independently of molecular weight, net charge, and monomer chemistry, since changes in topology enable fine-tuning of the effective charge density without altering these molecular characteristics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15703 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a): Polyelectrolyte solutions can split into a supernatant with a low polyelectrolyte concentration and a coacervate with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase diagrams of simple (subfigure (a) and (c)) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Phase behavior of mixed complex coacervates where symmetric pairs are considered for all topologies, i.e. the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references

  1. [1]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid- Liquid Phase Separation in Biology, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology30, 39 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    S. F. Banani, H. O. Lee, A. A. Hyman, and M. K. Rosen, Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology18, 285 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    J. T. G. Overbeek and M. J. Voorn, Phase separation in polyelectrolyte solutions. Theory of complex coacer- vation, Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 49, 7 (1957)

    1957

  4. [4]

    C. E. Sing and S. L. Perry, Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation, Soft Matter16, 2885 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    A. M. Rumyantsev, N. E. Jackson, and J. J. d. Pablo, Polyelectrolyte Complex Coacervates: Recent Develop- ments and New Frontiers, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics12, 155 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Muthukumar,Physics of Charged Macromolecules: Synthetic and Biological Systems(Cambridge University 6 Press, Cambridge, 2023)

    M. Muthukumar,Physics of Charged Macromolecules: Synthetic and Biological Systems(Cambridge University 6 Press, Cambridge, 2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    I. A. Ram ´ ırez Marrero and S. L. Perry, Fundamentals and Design Rules of Polyelectrolyte Complex Materials: A Comprehensive Review, Chemical Reviews126, 5413 (2026)

    2026

  8. [8]

    J.-M. Choi, A. S. Holehouse, and R. V. Pappu, Physical Principles Underlying the Complex Biology of Intracellu- lar Phase Transitions, Annual Review of Biophysics49, 107 (2020)

    2020

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Galvanetto, M

    N. Galvanetto, M. T. Ivanovi´ c, A. Chowdhury, A. Sottini, M. F. N¨ uesch, D. Nettels, R. B. Best, and B. Schuler, Extreme dynamics in a biomolecular condensate, Nature 619, 876 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Dai, Z.-G

    Y. Dai, Z.-G. Wang, and R. N. Zare, Unlocking the elec- trochemical functions of biomolecular condensates, Na- ture Chemical Biology20, 1420 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Lu and E

    T. Lu and E. Spruijt, Multiphase Complex Coacervate Droplets, Journal of the American Chemical Society142, 2905 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Chen, E.-Q

    X. Chen, E.-Q. Chen, A.-C. Shi, and S. Yang, Multiphase Coacervates Driven by Electrostatic Correlations, ACS Macro Letters10, 1041 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    W. M. Jacobs, Theory and Simulation of Multiphase Co- existence in Biomolecular Mixtures, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation19, 3429 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    J. Wang, X. Chen, E.-Q. Chen, and S. Yang, Interfa- cial Tensions of Polyelectrolyte Multiphase Coacervation, Macromolecules57, 9698 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Agrawal, Y

    A. Agrawal, Y. N. Fang, S. Rizvi, N. F. Noor Azman, M. V. Tirrell, A. Karim, and A. E. Neitzel, Charge Den- sity Mismatch Drives Demixing in Multicomponent Poly- electrolyte Complexes, Macromolecules58, 7776 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Spruijt, Chapter 6 - Multiphase complex droplets, in Droplets of Life, edited by V

    E. Spruijt, Chapter 6 - Multiphase complex droplets, in Droplets of Life, edited by V. N. Uversky (Academic Press, 2023) pp. 173–204

    2023

  9. [17]

    T. Lu, S. Liese, B. S. Visser, M. H. I. van Haren, W. P. Lipi´ nski, W. T. S. Huck, C. A. Weber, and E. Spruijt, Controlling Multiphase Coacervate Wetting and Self-Organization by Interfacial Proteins, Journal of the American Chemical Society147, 22622 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    A. S. Ylitalo, C. Balzer, P. Zhang, and Z.-G. Wang, Electrostatic Correlations and Temperature-Dependent Dielectric Constant Can Model LCST in Polyelec- trolyte Complex Coacervation, Macromolecules54, 11326 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Spruijt, A

    E. Spruijt, A. H. Westphal, J. W. Borst, M. A. Co- hen Stuart, and J. van der Gucht, Binodal Compositions of Polyelectrolyte Complexes, Macromolecules43, 6476 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    L. Li, S. Srivastava, M. Andreev, A. B. Marciel, J. J. de Pablo, and M. V. Tirrell, Phase Behavior and Salt Par- titioning in Polyelectrolyte Complex Coacervates, Macro- molecules51, 2988 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Weinbreck, R

    F. Weinbreck, R. de Vries, P. Schrooyen, and C. G. de Kruif, Complex Coacervation of Whey Proteins and Gum Arabic, Biomacromolecules4, 293 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    Ausserw¨ oger, R

    H. Ausserw¨ oger, R. Scrutton, C. M. Fischer, T. Snei- deris, D. Qian, E. de Csill´ ery, I. Baronaite, K. L. Saar, A. Z. Bia lek, M. Oeller, G. Krainer, T. M. Franzmann, S. Wittmann, J. M. Iglesias-Artola, G. Invernizzi, A. A. Hyman, S. Alberti, N. Lorenzen, and T. P. J. Knowl...

    2026

  15. [23]

    A. E. Neitzel, Y. N. Fang, B. Yu, A. M. Rumyantsev, J. J. de Pablo, and M. V. Tirrell, Polyelectrolyte Complex Coacervation across a Broad Range of Charge Densities, Macromolecules54, 6878 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    S. Chen, P. Zhang, and Z.-G. Wang, Complexation be- tween Oppositely Charged Polyelectrolytes in Dilute So- lution: Effects of Charge Asymmetry, Macromolecules 55, 3898 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    C. Luo, N. Hess, D. Aierken, Y. Qiang, J. A. Joseph, and D. Zwicker, Theory of Condensate Size Control by Molecular Charge Asymmetry, ACS Macro Letters14, 1484 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Shakya, M

    A. Shakya, M. Girard, J. T. King, and M. Olvera de la Cruz, Role of Chain Flexibility in Asymmetric Polyelec- trolyte Complexation in Salt Solutions, Macromolecules 53, 1258 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Y.-H. Lin, J. D. Forman-Kay, and H. S. Chan, Sequence- Specific Polyampholyte Phase Separation in Membrane- less Organelles, Physical Review Letters117, 178101 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    C. W. Pak, M. Kosno, A. S. Holehouse, S. B. Padrick, A. Mittal, R. Ali, A. A. Yunus, D. R. Liu, R. V. Pappu, and M. K. Rosen, Sequence Determinants of Intracellular Phase Separation by Complex Coacervation of a Disor- dered Protein, Molecular Cell63, 72 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Y.-H. Lin, J. D. Forman-Kay, and H. S. Chan, Theories for Sequence-Dependent Phase Behaviors of Biomolecu- lar Condensates, Biochemistry57, 2499 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Chang, T

    L.-W. Chang, T. K. Lytle, M. Radhakrishna, J. J. Madinya, J. V´ elez, C. E. Sing, and S. L. Perry, Sequence and entropy-based control of complex coacervates, Na- ture Communications8, 1273 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    S. P. O. Danielsen, J. McCarty, J.-E. Shea, K. T. De- laney, and G. H. Fredrickson, Molecular design of self- coacervation phenomena in block polyampholytes, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 8224 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    T. K. Lytle, L.-W. Chang, N. Markiewicz, S. L. Perry, and C. E. Sing, Designing Electrostatic Interactions via Polyelectrolyte Monomer Sequence, ACS Central Science 5, 709 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    B. Yu, A. M. Rumyantsev, N. E. Jackson, H. Liang, J. M. Ting, S. Meng, M. V. Tirrell, and J. J. d. Pablo, Complex coacervation of statistical polyelectrolytes: role of monomer sequences and formation of inhomogeneous coacervates, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering6, 790 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Adachi and K

    K. Adachi and K. Kawaguchi, Predicting Heteropolymer Interactions: Demixing and Hypermixing of Disordered Protein Sequences, Physical Review X14, 031011 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Qin and J

    J. Qin and J. J. de Pablo, Criticality and Connectivity in Macromolecular Charge Complexation, Macromolecules 49, 8789 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    B. M. Johnston, C. W. Johnston, R. A. Letteri, T. K. Lytle, C. E. Sing, T. Emrick, and S. L. Perry, The effect of comb architecture on complex coacervation, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry15, 7630 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    T. K. Lytle and C. E. Sing, Tuning chain interaction entropy in complex coacervation using polymer stiffness, architecture, and salt valency, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering3, 183 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Tagliabue, J

    A. Tagliabue, J. Landsgesell, M. Mella, and C. Holm, Can oppositely charged polyelectrolyte stars form a gel? A simulational study, Soft Matter17, 1574 (2021). 7

    2021

  31. [39]

    Staˇ no, P

    R. Staˇ no, P. Koˇ sovan, A. Tagliabue, and C. Holm, Elec- trostatically Cross-Linked Reversible Gels—Effects of pH and Ionic Strength, Macromolecules54, 4769 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    B. Yu, H. Liang, P. F. Nealey, M. V. Tirrell, A. M. Rumyantsev, and J. J. de Pablo, Structure and Dynamics of Hybrid Colloid–Polyelectrolyte Coacervates: Insights from Molecular Simulations, Macromolecules56, 7256 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Chen, E.-Q

    X. Chen, E.-Q. Chen, and S. Yang, Multiphase Coacerva- tion of Polyelectrolytes Driven by Asymmetry of Charged Sequence, Macromolecules56, 3 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Zhang and B

    J.-J. Zhang and B. Li, Self-Assembly of Star- Polyelectrolytes in Various Solution Conditions, Macro- molecules57, 396 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    K. C. Stevens and M. V. Tirrell, Impact of a Lightly Branched Star Polyelectrolyte Architecture on Polyelec- trolyte Complexes, ACS Macro Letters13, 688 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    G¨ urel, I

    U. G¨ urel, I. A. Gjerapic, W. J. H. Arends, R. A. Mohamed Yunus, A. Guzik, P. Raffa, D. Parisi, and A. Giuntoli, Characterizing the Structural Conformation of Highly Charged Star-Linear Polyelectrolyte Mixtures in Solution, Macromolecules58, 10464 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Welch and M

    P. Welch and M. Muthukumar, Dendrimer– Polyelectrolyte Complexation: A Model Guest–Host System, Macromolecules33, 6159 (2000)

    2000

  38. [46]

    E. A. M¨ uller and K. E. Gubbins, Simulation of hard triatomic and tetratomic molecules, Mol. Phys.80, 957 (1993)

    1993

  39. [47]

    Zhang, N

    P. Zhang, N. M. Alsaifi, J. Wu, and Z.-G. Wang, Salting-Out and Salting-In of Polyelectrolyte Solutions: A Liquid-State Theory Study, Macromolecules49, 9720 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Shen, N. M. Alsaifi, and Z.-G. Wang, Salt Partitioning in Complex Coacervation of Symmet- ric Polyelectrolytes, Macromolecules51, 5586 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Zhang, N

    P. Zhang, N. M. Alsaifi, J. Wu, and Z.-G. Wang, Poly- electrolyte complex coacervation: Effects of concentra- tion asymmetry, The Journal of Chemical Physics149, 163303 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    B. D. Marshall and W. G. Chapman, Higher Order Clas- sical Density Functional Theory for Branched Chains and Rings, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B115, 15036 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    B. D. Marshall and W. G. Chapman, Three new branched chain equations of state based on Wertheim’s pertur- bation theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics138, 174109 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    Zhang and W

    Y. Zhang and W. G. Chapman, Modeling Thermo- dynamic Properties of Isomeric Alkanes with a New Branched Equation of State, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research57, 1679 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Fredrickson,The Equilibrium Theory of Inhomoge- neous Polymers(Oxford University Press, 2005)

    G. Fredrickson,The Equilibrium Theory of Inhomoge- neous Polymers(Oxford University Press, 2005)

    2005

  46. [54]

    V. Y. Borue and I. Y. Erukhimovich, A statistical theory of weakly charged polyelectrolytes: fluctuations, equa- tion of state and microphase separation, Macromolecules 21, 3240 (1988)

    1988

  47. [55]

    K. A. Mahdi and M. Olvera de la Cruz, Phase Diagrams of Salt-Free Polyelectrolyte Semidilute Solutions, Macro- molecules33, 7649 (2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    J. Lee, Y. O. Popov, and G. H. Fredrickson, Com- plex coacervation: A field theoretic simulation study of polyelectrolyte complexation, The Journal of Chemical Physics128, 224908 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Y.-H. Lin, J. Song, J. D. Forman-Kay, and H. S. Chan, Random-phase-approximation theory for sequence- dependent, biologically functional liquid-liquid phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins, Journal of Molecular Liquids From simple liquids to macro- molecular so...

    2017

  50. [58]

    K. T. Delaney and G. H. Fredrickson, Theory of poly- electrolyte complexation—Complex coacervates are self- coacervates, The Journal of Chemical Physics146, 224902 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    A. M. Rumyantsev, N. E. Jackson, B. Yu, J. M. Ting, W. Chen, M. V. Tirrell, and J. J. de Pablo, Control- ling Complex Coacervation via Random Polyelectrolyte Sequences, ACS Macro Letters8, 1296 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    See Supplemental Material for details

  53. [61]

    P. J. Walker, H.-W. Yew, and A. Riedemann, Clapey- ron.jl: An Extensible, Open-Source Fluid Thermody- namics Toolkit, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Re- search61, 7130 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    All code used for producing the results shown in this work are provided in the Supplemental Material

  55. [63]

    For many polymers,b≈0.4−0.6 nm [64], meaning that this Bjerrum length would be slightly smaller than that of water

  56. [64]

    M. I. Giannotti and G. J. Vancso, Interrogation of Single Synthetic Polymer Chains and Polysaccharides by AFM-Based Force Spectroscopy, ChemPhysChem8, 2290 (2007). Supplemental Material: How Topology Shapes the Phase Behavior of Polyelectrolytes David Beyer,1, 2,∗ Pierre J. Wa...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.