Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

A massive star cluster is channeling cosmic rays out of the Milky Way disk, with energy densities over an order of magnitude above the local interstellar medium.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 22:17 UTC pith:RHOAIFRN

load-bearing objection A careful Fermi-LAT analysis finds a likely new GeV component connected to Westerlund 1's TeV ring, but the H I cavity—the main support for a nascent outflow—rests on uncertain kinematics, leaving the interpretation conditional. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15797 v1 pith:RHOAIFRN submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.HE

A cosmic-ray loaded nascent outflow driven by a massive star cluster

Marianne Lemoine-Goumard , Lucia H\"arer , Lars Mohrmann , Romain Bernet , Jim Hinton , Giada Peron , Brian Reville , Luigi Tibaldo
show 1 more author
Thibault Vieu
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords cosmic raysstar clustersgalactic outflowsgamma-ray astronomyWesterlund 1inverse Comptoninterstellar mediumFermi-LAT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims to have discovered a nascent outflow of cosmic rays driven by the massive star cluster Westerlund 1. Using 15 years of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data, the authors find a new GeV source, J1654−467, extending from the cluster away from the Galactic plane. The emission coincides with a cavity in atomic hydrogen and connects smoothly to the previously known TeV ring, indicating a single population of relativistic electrons accelerating at the cluster wind termination shock and streaming outward. If correct, this is direct evidence that young massive star clusters can launch cosmic-ray-loaded outflows into the galactic halo, with cosmic-ray energy densities high enough to influence the outflow dynamics and potentially affect galaxy evolution.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the GeV gamma-ray emission J1654−467, a Gaussian structure roughly 150 pc long in projection, is the low-energy continuation of the TeV ring around Westerlund 1, tracing relativistic electrons that have escaped the cluster's superbubble and are moving into a low-density cavity in the Galactic disk. The spectral and spatial continuity between the Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. observations supports a common leptonic origin from a single electron population injected at the cluster wind termination shock. The coincident H I under-density, with a deficit of about 0.3–0.7 atoms cm−3, is interpreted as the nascent outflow cavity, requiring an energy of order 10^50 erg readily su

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is inverse-Compton emission from relativistic electrons that are accelerated at the termination shock of the collective cluster wind, then advected and diffused along the superbubble outflow. The energy-dependent cooling of these electrons naturally explains why the TeV emission stays near the cluster while the GeV emission extends further: lower-energy electrons have longer cooling times and travel farther. The spectral softening with distance and the high-energy cutoff in the far outflow are used to estimate the transport time-scale (125–200 kyr), constraining the flow geometry and diffusion coefficient.

Load-bearing premise

The H I velocity windows chosen (v_LSR from −63 to −37 km/s) are assumed to isolate gas at the same distance as Westerlund 1; if the under-density is a chance fluctuation or lies at a different distance, the spatial coincidence with the gamma-ray emission loses its causal meaning.

What would settle it

A parallax measurement of the H I cavity gas or detection of a different distance would break the association. Alternatively, if future data show that the GeV source spectrum does not soften with distance (i.e., no high-energy cutoff in the far outflow), the cooling/transport picture would be contradicted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The detection provides the first direct evidence that a young massive star cluster is actively channeling cosmic rays out of the Galactic disk, supporting models of cluster-driven outflows.
  • The cosmic-ray energy density in the outflow exceeds the local interstellar medium by more than an order of magnitude, meaning cosmic rays can exert dynamical pressure on the gas and influence the outflow's evolution.
  • The inferred transport time to the far outflow is much shorter than spherically symmetric superbubble advection predicts, implying either a strongly collimated flow or significant diffusive transport, which will constrain superbubble models.
  • If such outflows are common, as the paper suggests, they could be a major pathway for delivering cosmic rays from star-forming regions into the Galactic halo, with implications for the cosmic-ray budget and galactic wind models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this outflow is generic, similar GeV outflows and H I cavities should be detectable around other young massive clusters, and targeted multi-wavelength searches would test this prediction.
  • The spectral softening with distance along the outflow, though only a ~2σ indication, could be a probe of energy-dependent diffusion in superbubble environments if confirmed with more data.
  • The inferred transport time-scale implies that advection is not spherically symmetric; a collimated chimney or magnetic-field-guided flow would be a natural explanation, which could be tested with future polarimetric or radio observations.
  • Cosmic rays escaping through such chimneys may contribute to the extended gamma-ray emission observed at high Galactic latitudes and to the 'cocoon' emission around other star-forming regions, possibly linking cluster outflows to the large-scale cosmic-ray sea.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a Fermi-LAT study of the Westerlund 1 region between 3 GeV and 3 TeV, identifying a new extended GeV source, J1654−467, modeled as a Gaussian of 0.71° radius located south of the cluster, plus a TeV-template component. The GeV emission connects spectrally to the H.E.S.S. TeV ring, and the authors propose that both arise from inverse-Compton emission of electrons accelerated at the cluster wind termination shock. They further identify an H I under-density in GASS III data at velocities bracketing the cluster's radial velocity and interpret this as a cavity aligned with the GeV source, arguing that the cluster is in the early stages of blowing a CR-loaded outflow through the Galactic disc. A one-zone leptonic model reproduces the total SED with an efficiency of 0.7% of the wind power, and a far-region model is used to infer an injection period and a 125–200 kyr interval without fresh injection, interpreted as a transport time-scale. The paper concludes that the CR energy density in the outflow is more than an order of magnitude above the local ISM.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, this is the first direct observational evidence for a cosmic-ray-loaded outflow from a young massive cluster and would strongly constrain models of CR transport and superbubble blowout. The Fermi-LAT analysis is careful and reproducible: the authors use 15 years of public data, a custom Galactic diffuse model with multiple degrees of freedom, AIC-based model selection, pulsar contamination checks, and residual maps, and the GeV–TeV spectral continuity is credible. The main risk is the H I cavity: its association with Westerlund 1 is not quantified and the kinematics are ambiguous. The transport time-scale also rests on a marginal spectral feature. These issues are local and can be fixed with additional analysis; they do not invalidate the detection of the extended GeV source, whose morphological connection to the TeV emission is the strongest part of the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Galactic kinematics in the direction of Westerlund 1'; 'H I column densities'; Fig. 3] The claim that J1654−467 traces a nascent outflow rests on the identification of the H I under-density as a cavity at the distance of Westerlund 1. The paper itself states (Methods) that kinematics in this direction deviate from rotation, the v_LSR windows contain a superposition of Norma and Scutum-Crux arms, and near-far ambiguity is severe. The density deficit is measured against two hand-picked control regions with no significance estimate. A local minimum in a crowded spiral-arm region can arise by chance. Please provide a statistical significance (e.g., bootstrap/control-region ensemble) and/or independent distance evidence (e.g., 3D dust, HI self-absorption) linking the cavity to Wd1, and discuss the known bubbles B1/B2 as a cross-check.
  2. [Results 'Modelling'; Methods 'Modelling details'; Fig. 4, Fig. 9] The far-outflow model fixes the normalization by construction (assumes the total-model injection and adjusts the injection period), so the inferred 0.5–1 Myr injection time and 125–200 kyr 'no new particles' interval are partly circular. This is compounded by the paper's own statement (Methods) that the near/far spectral softening is only ~2σ significant. The transport-time-scale conclusion is therefore not robust. Please present the far model as an illustration with explicit caveats, or propagate uncertainties and show sensitivity to the assumed injection history and diffusion coefficient.
  3. [Abstract; Results 'Modelling'; Concluding remarks] The energy-density claim ('more than an order of magnitude above the ISM') depends on the assumed electron acceleration efficiency η=0.7%, the assumed hadronic-to-electron ratio, and the assumed cavity depth. The abstract qualifies with 'assuming standard...', but the concluding remarks state the estimate categorically. A sensitivity study over η, B, and e/p ratio, or a softened statement, is needed to make this part of the central claim proportionate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, 'Modelling details'] The 'Modelling details' subsection appears twice verbatim, including line-number artifacts; remove the duplicate.
  2. [Fig. 3] Axis labels render units as 'km s□1' and '1020 cm□2'; fix the typography/superscripts.
  3. [Table 1] Clarify the sign convention in the ΔAIC definition. The text's formula appears inconsistent with the positive values reported unless Δd.o.f and ΔlnL are defined as baseline-minus-model; please state the convention explicitly.
  4. [Fig. 6] Panels (c,d) use different color scales; adding a common scale or explicit colorbar limits would aid comparison.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The GeV/TeV/H I discovery is independent, but the far-outflow 'transport time-scale' is a fitted parameter read back as a physical timescale.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Results and Discussion, 'Modelling'; Methods, 'Modelling details' (Fig. 9)]
    "To further investigate the scenario of CR transport along the nascent outflow, we present a second model to fit only the emission of the 'far' outflow region ... We assume the same energy injection as that of the total model, but fix the period during which injection occurred to match the normalisation in the far region. The required time-scale of injection is 0.5–1 Myr. The high-energy cut-off ... can be reproduced if no new particles were injected into this region in the last approximately 125–200 kyr ... This can be interpreted as the transport time-scale from the acceleration site ... to t"

    The 0.5–1 Myr injection period and the 125–200 kyr cutoff are free parameters of the far-region model, fixed to reproduce the observed normalization and spectral cutoff; they are then presented as a physical transport time ('This can be interpreted as the transport time-scale...'). The Methods section confirms the 'expected escape time' band is obtained by tuning the normalization: 'The lower bound (125 kyr) corresponds to the model shown in Fig. 4. The upper bound (200 kyr) is obtained by changing the normalisation of the model for the entire region to match the Fermi-LAT points above 10 GeV.' The quoted timescale is thus statistically forced by the same data it is claimed to explain, not independently predicted.

full rationale

The paper's central discovery—the extended GeV source J1654–467 and the H I cavity—does not reduce to its inputs. The Fermi-LAT morphology, the H.E.S.S. TeV map, and the GASS III H I data are independent data sets, and the spatial/spectral connection between them is not defined circularly. The H I velocity-window selection involves a near/far distance ambiguity, but that is a systematic/correctness concern rather than a circularity: the paper acknowledges the ambiguity and the chosen windows bracket independent kinematic tracers. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in solely via self-citation; the modeling assumptions from Härer et al. (2023) are stated and used as a model framework. The only step approaching circularity is the far-outflow model, where the transport timescale is effectively a renamed fitted parameter: the injection duration and cutoff are adjusted to match the far-region data and then interpreted as the physical escape time from the cluster to the far outflow. Because this is a secondary interpretive claim and the main discovery has independent support, the overall circularity score is moderate rather than high.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central inference rests on standard leptonic IC assumptions, H I optical-thinness, and kinematic distance assignments, plus a set of model parameters fitted to the gamma-ray SED. No genuinely new fundamental entities are introduced, but the 'outflow' is an inferred structure without direct kinematic confirmation.

free parameters (7)
  • Electron injection spectral index = 2.25
    Chosen for the total and far-region inverse-Compton fits; sets the gamma-ray SED shape.
  • Electron acceleration efficiency eta = 0.7% above 0.01 GeV
    Normalization fitted so the total model matches Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. fluxes; directly used to estimate U_e ~ 1-10 eV cm^-3.
  • Magnetic field strength B = 2 microgauss
    Assumed constant; enters synchrotron cooling, IC cooling balance, and the diffusion coefficient in Eq. (1).
  • Injection period into far outflow = 0.5-1 Myr
    Adjusted in the far-outflow model to match its normalization; subsequently interpreted as the transport time-scale.
  • Last-injection / high-energy cutoff time = 125-200 kyr
    Chosen to reproduce the high-energy cutoff in the far outflow spectrum; interpreted as the cooling time since injection stopped.
  • Cavity line-of-sight depth = 70 pc
    Assumed equal to the transverse width of the cavity to convert the column-density deficit into a volume-density deficit of 0.3-0.7 cm^-3.
  • Turbulence injection scale R_inj = 1 pc
    Input to the Kolmogorov diffusion coefficient in Eq. (1); chosen, not measured.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The gamma-ray emission from J1654-467 is inverse-Compton radiation from electrons accelerated at the Westerlund 1 wind termination shock, with hadronic emission negligible in the low-density cavity.
    This is the basis of the leptonic interpretation; the paper does not directly measure target gas for a hadronic scenario but cites Haerer et al. [41] for the TeV ring.
  • domain assumption The H I velocity windows v_LSR = [-63,-50] and [-50,-37] km/s trace gas at the distance of Westerlund 1.
    The paper acknowledges near-far ambiguity and non-rotation kinematics toward Wd1; the cavity association depends on this velocity-distance mapping.
  • standard math Atomic hydrogen is optically thin, with column density conversion X_HI = 1.823e18 cm^-2 / (K km/s).
    Standard H I conversion used to derive column-density maps; the paper verifies a low spin temperature of 100 K gives compatible maps.
  • domain assumption Superbubble expansion in a stratified Galactic disc produces asymmetric breakout and chimney-like outflows.
    Background theory from Mac Low et al. [15] and Baumgartner & Breitschwerdt [43]; used to motivate the outflow geometry.
  • domain assumption Standard non-thermal electron/proton injection efficiencies apply, so proton energy density exceeds electron energy density by a large factor.
    Needed for the claim that co-accelerated protons give a total CR energy density an order of magnitude above the ISM; this ratio is not measured here.
  • domain assumption Kolmogorov diffusion with B = 2 microgauss and R_inj = 1 pc describes electron transport in the superbubble.
    Eq. (1); one of several possible transport prescriptions, used to argue the advection time-scale is too long compared with the inferred transport time.
invented entities (1)
  • Nascent cosmic-ray-loaded outflow (chimney) from Westerlund 1 no independent evidence
    purpose: Explains J1654-467 as electrons transported out of the disc and the H I cavity as the excavated channel; enables cosmic-ray escape into the halo.
    Inferred from gamma-ray morphology plus an H I under-density. No direct outflow velocity or cosmic-ray pressure measurement is presented, and the distance association of the H I cavity is uncertain.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18627 in / 14070 out tokens · 125384 ms · 2026-08-01T22:17:25.251707+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Cosmic rays are widely held to drive outflows from star-forming galaxies and profoundly influence galaxy evolution. Direct evidence for cosmic-ray carrying outflows is however lacking. At the same time there is increasing awareness of the importance of massive star clusters in the acceleration of cosmic rays in galaxies. Here we report on the discovery of a nascent outflow driven by the massive star cluster Westerlund 1. Giga-electronvolt gamma-ray emission coincident with a cavity visible in atomic hydrogen traces the emergence of a population of relativistic electrons out of the Galactic Disc. The emission is offset from tera-electronvolt gamma-ray radiation surrounding the cluster, but connects to it smoothly spectrally and spatially. The implied energy density of co-accelerated protons and nuclei, assuming standard non-thermal electron/proton injection efficiencies, is at least an order of magnitude higher than that in the general interstellar medium. These particles therefore have the potential to dynamically influence the outflow. This discovery suggests that cosmic-ray loaded outflows may be a common feature of young massive star clusters, with implications for the transport of cosmic rays into the halo of the Galaxy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics62, 529–591 (2024) DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-041224-011924 arXiv:2406.08561

    Thompson, T.A., Heckman, T.M.: Theory and Observation of Winds from Star- Forming Galaxies. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics62, 529–591 (2024) DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-041224-011924 arXiv:2406.08561

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters816, 19 (2016) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L19 arXiv:1509.07247

    Girichidis, P.,et al.: Launching Cosmic-Ray-driven Outflows from the Magne- tized Interstellar Medium. Astrophysical Journal Letters816, 19 (2016) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L19 arXiv:1509.07247

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504, 1039–1061 (2021) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab900 arXiv:2103.14128

    Rathjen, T.-E.,et al.: SILCC VI - Multiphase ISM structure, stellar clustering, and outflows with supernovae, stellar winds, ionizing radiation, and cosmic rays. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504, 1039–1061 (2021) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab900 arXiv:2103.14128

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society524, 6374–6391 (2023) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2257 arXiv:2302.03701

    Modak, S., Quataert, E., Jiang, Y.-F., Thompson, T.A.: Cosmic-ray driven galac- tic winds from the warm interstellar medium. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society524, 6374–6391 (2023) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2257 arXiv:2302.03701

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Astrophysical Journal964, 99 (2024) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5c arXiv:2401.04169

    Armillotta, L., Ostriker, E.C., Kim, C.-G., Jiang, Y.-F.: Cosmic-Ray Acceleration of Galactic Outflows in Multiphase Gas. Astrophysical Journal964, 99 (2024) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5c arXiv:2401.04169

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal(2024) arXiv:2410.06988

    Sike, B., Thomas, T., Ruszkowski, M., Pfrommer, C., Weber, M.: Cosmic Ray- Driven Galactic Winds with Resolved ISM and Ion-Neutral Damping. Accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal(2024) arXiv:2410.06988

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics(2025) arXiv:2502.02635

    Kjellgren, K., et al.: The dynamical impact of cosmic rays in the Rhea mag- netohydrodynamics simulations. Submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics(2025) arXiv:2502.02635

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews31, 4 (2023) DOI: 10.1007/s00159- 023-00149-2 arXiv:2306.03141

    Ruszkowski, M., Pfrommer, C.: Cosmic ray feedback in galaxies and galaxy clusters. Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews31, 4 (2023) DOI: 10.1007/s00159- 023-00149-2 arXiv:2306.03141

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Astrophysical Journal165, 381 (1971) DOI: 10.1086/150903

    Johnson, H.E., Axford, W.I.: Galactic Winds. Astrophysical Journal165, 381 (1971) DOI: 10.1086/150903

    work page doi:10.1086/150903 1971

  10. [10]

    Astrophysical Journal196, 107–120 (1975) DOI: 10.1086/153397

    Ipavich, F.M.: Galactic winds driven by cosmic rays. Astrophysical Journal196, 107–120 (1975) DOI: 10.1086/153397

    doi:10.1086/153397 1975

  11. [11]

    Breitschwerdt, D., McKenzie, J.F., V¨ olk, H.J.: Galactic winds. I. Cosmic ray and wave-driven winds from the galaxy. Astronomy & Astrophysics245, 79 (1991) 23

    1991

  12. [12]

    Breitschwerdt, D., McKenzie, J.F., V¨ olk, H.J.: Galactic winds. II. Role of the disk-halo interface in cosmic ray driven galactic winds. Astronomy & Astrophysics 269, 54–66 (1993)

    1993

  13. [13]

    Astrophysical Journal218, 148–169 (1977) DOI: 10.1086/155667

    McKee, C.F., Ostriker, J.P.: A theory of the interstellar medium: three com- ponents regulated by supernova explosions in an inhomogeneous substrate. Astrophysical Journal218, 148–169 (1977) DOI: 10.1086/155667

    doi:10.1086/155667 1977

  14. [14]

    Reviews of Modern Physics73, 1031–1066 (2001) DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1031 arXiv:astro- ph/0106359

    Ferri` ere, K.M.: The interstellar environment of our galaxy. Reviews of Modern Physics73, 1031–1066 (2001) DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1031 arXiv:astro- ph/0106359

    arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    Astrophysical Journal337, 141 (1989) DOI: 10.1086/167094

    Mac Low, M.-M., McCray, R., Norman, M.L.: Superbubble Blowout Dynamics. Astrophysical Journal337, 141 (1989) DOI: 10.1086/167094

    doi:10.1086/167094 1989

  16. [16]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia25, 184–200 (2008) DOI: 10.1071/AS08004 arXiv:0808.2550

    Gaensler, B.M., Madsen, G.J., Chatterjee, S., Mao, S.A.: The Vertical Structure of Warm Ionised Gas in the Milky Way. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia25, 184–200 (2008) DOI: 10.1071/AS08004 arXiv:0808.2550

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Astrophysical Journal345, 372 (1989) DOI: 10.1086/167912

    Norman, C.A., Satoru, I.: The Disk-Halo Interaction: Superbubbles and the Struc- ture of the Interstellar Medium. Astrophysical Journal345, 372 (1989) DOI: 10.1086/167912

    work page doi:10.1086/167912 1989

  18. [18]

    Nature567, 347–350 (2019) DOI: 10.1038/s41586- 019-1009-6 arXiv:1904.05969

    Ponti, G.,et al.: An X-ray chimney extending hundreds of parsecs above and below the Galactic Centre. Nature567, 347–350 (2019) DOI: 10.1038/s41586- 019-1009-6 arXiv:1904.05969

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Nature Astronomy3, 561–567 (2019) DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0724- 0 arXiv:1804.02331

    Aharonian, F., Yang, R., Wilhelmi, E.: Massive stars as major factories of Galactic cosmic rays. Nature Astronomy3, 561–567 (2019) DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0724- 0 arXiv:1804.02331

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504, 6096–6105 (2021) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab690 arXiv:2102.09217

    Morlino, G., Blasi, P., Peretti, E., Cristofari, P.: Particle acceleration in winds of star clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504, 6096–6105 (2021) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab690 arXiv:2102.09217

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 519, 136–147 (2023) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3469 arXiv:2211.11625

    Vieu, T., Reville, B.: Massive star cluster origin for the galactic cosmic ray popu- lation at very-high energies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 519, 136–147 (2023) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3469 arXiv:2211.11625

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Science334, 1103–1107 (2011) DOI: 10.1126/science.1210311

    Ackermann, M.,et al.(Fermi-LAT Collaboration): A Cocoon of Freshly Acceler- ated Cosmic Rays Detected by Fermi in the Cygnus Superbubble. Science334, 1103–1107 (2011) DOI: 10.1126/science.1210311

    doi:10.1126/science.1210311 2011

  23. [23]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics600, 107 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201630213 arXiv:1612.02250 24

    Yang, R.-Z., Aharonian, F.: Diffuseγ-ray emission near the young massive cluster NGC 3603. Astronomy & Astrophysics600, 107 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201630213 arXiv:1612.02250 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics640, 60 (2020) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202037518 arXiv:2007.15295

    Yang, R.-Z., Wang, Y.: The diffuse gamma-ray emission toward the Galactic mini starburst W43. Astronomy & Astrophysics640, 60 (2020) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202037518 arXiv:2007.15295

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society494, 3405–3412 (2020) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa947 arXiv:2006.02052

    Sun, X.-N., Yang, R.-Z., Wang, X.-Y.: Diffuseγ-ray emission from the vicinity of young massive star cluster RSGC 1. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society494, 3405–3412 (2020) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa947 arXiv:2006.02052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 4747–4753 (2022) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1252 arXiv:2205.06430

    Liu, B., Yang, R.-Z., Chen, Z.: Gamma-ray observation towards the young mas- sive star cluster NGC 6618 in the M17 region. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 4747–4753 (2022) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1252 arXiv:2205.06430

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Nature Astronomy8, 530–537 (2024) DOI: 10.1038/s41550-023-02168-6 arXiv:2407.07509

    Peron, G., Casanova, S., Gabici, S., Baghmanyan, V., Aharonian, F.: The contribution of winds from star clusters to the Galactic cosmic-ray popula- tion. Nature Astronomy8, 530–537 (2024) DOI: 10.1038/s41550-023-02168-6 arXiv:2407.07509

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Collaboration): Revisiting the Westerlund 2 field with the HESS telescope array

    Abramowski, A.,et al.(H.E.S.S. Collaboration): Revisiting the Westerlund 2 field with the HESS telescope array. Astronomy & Astrophysics525, 46 (2011) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015290 arXiv:1009.3012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    U.,et al.(HA WC Collaboration): HA WC observations of the acceleration of very-high-energy cosmic rays in the Cygnus Cocoon

    Abeysekara, A. U.,et al.(HA WC Collaboration): HA WC observations of the acceleration of very-high-energy cosmic rays in the Cygnus Cocoon. Nature Astronomy5, 465–471 (2021) DOI: 10.1038/s41550-021-01318-y arXiv:2103.06820

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Collaboration): A deep spectromorphological study of theγ-ray emission surrounding the young massive stellar cluster Westerlund 1

    Aharonian, F.,et al.(H.E.S.S. Collaboration): A deep spectromorphological study of theγ-ray emission surrounding the young massive stellar cluster Westerlund 1. Astronomy & Astrophysics666, 124 (2022) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244323 arXiv:2207.10921

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters970, 21 (2024) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5e67 arXiv:2407.16219

    Aharonian, F.,et al.(HESS Collaboration): Very-high-energyγ-Ray Emis- sion from Young Massive Star Clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophysical Journal Letters970, 21 (2024) DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5e67 arXiv:2407.16219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Science Bulletin69, 449–457 (2024) DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.12.040 arXiv:2310.10100

    Cao, Z.,et al.(LHAASO Collaboration): An ultrahigh-energyγ-ray bub- ble powered by a super PeVatron. Science Bulletin69, 449–457 (2024) DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.12.040 arXiv:2310.10100

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy68, 279502 (2025) DOI: 10.1007/s11433-024-2477-9 arXiv:2408.09905 25

    Cao, Z.,et al.(LHAASO Collaboration): Observation of theγ-ray emission from W43 with LHAASO. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy68, 279502 (2025) DOI: 10.1007/s11433-024-2477-9 arXiv:2408.09905 25

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Navarete, F., Damineli, A., Ramirez, A.E., Rocha, D., Almeida, L.: Distance and age of the massive stellar cluster Westerlund 1. I. Parallax method using Gaia- EDR3. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society516, 1289–1301 (2022) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2374 arXiv:2204.09414

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics664, 146 (2022) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142985 arXiv:2204.00422

    Negueruela, I.,et al.: Westerlund 1 under the light of Gaia EDR3: Distance, isolation, extent, and a hidden population. Astronomy & Astrophysics664, 146 (2022) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142985 arXiv:2204.00422

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics 434, 949–969 (2005) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042413 arXiv:astro-ph/0504342

    Clark, J.S., Negueruela, I., Crowther, P.A., Goodwin, S.P.: On the massive stellar population of the super star cluster Westerlund 1. Astronomy & Astrophysics 434, 949–969 (2005) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042413 arXiv:astro-ph/0504342

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society372, 1407–1424 (2006) DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10952.x arXiv:astro-ph/0608356

    Crowther, P.A., Hadfield, L.J., Clark, J.S., Negueruela, I., Vacca, W.D.: A cen- sus of the Wolf–Rayet content in Westerlund 1 from near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society372, 1407–1424 (2006) DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10952.x arXiv:astro-ph/0608356

    arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics478, 137–149 (2008) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361:20077579 arXiv:0711.1624

    Brandner, W.,et al.: Intermediate to low-mass stellar content of Wester- lund 1. Astronomy & Astrophysics478, 137–149 (2008) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361:20077579 arXiv:0711.1624

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  39. [39]

    Astrophysical Journal912, 16 (2021) DOI: 10.3847/1538- 4357/abec44 arXiv:2103.02609

    Beasor, E.R., Davies, B., Smith, N., Gehrz, R.D., Figer, D.F.: The Age of Westerland 1 Revisited. Astrophysical Journal912, 16 (2021) DOI: 10.3847/1538- 4357/abec44 arXiv:2103.02609

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Astrophysical Journal650, 203 (2006) DOI: 10.1086/507175 arXiv:astro-ph/0606492

    Muno, M.P.,et al.: Diffuse, Nonthermal X-Ray Emission from the Galac- tic Star Cluster Westerlund 1. Astrophysical Journal650, 203 (2006) DOI: 10.1086/507175 arXiv:astro-ph/0606492

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics671, 4 (2023) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245444 arXiv:2301.10496

    H¨ arer, L.K., Reville, B., Hinton, J., Mohrmann, L., Vieu, T.: Understanding the TeVγ-ray emission surrounding the young massive star cluster Westerlund 1. Astronomy & Astrophysics671, 4 (2023) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245444 arXiv:2301.10496

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    B.,et al.(Fermi-LAT Collaboration): The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission

    Atwood, W. B.,et al.(Fermi-LAT Collaboration): The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission. Astrophysical Journal697, 1071 (2009) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071 arXiv:0902.1089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    Baumgartner, V., Breitschwerdt, D.: Superbubble evolution in disk galaxies. I. Study of blow-out by analytical models. Astronomy & Astrophysics557, 140 (2013) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321261 arXiv:1402.0194

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Update: improved correction for instrumental effects and new data release

    Kalberla, P.M.W., Haud, U.: GASS: The Parkes Galactic All-Sky Survey. Update: improved correction for instrumental effects and new data release. Astronomy & Astrophysics578, 78 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525859 arXiv:1505.01011 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    In: Proc

    Hahn, J.: GAMERA - A Modular Framework For Spectral Modeling In VHE Astronomy. In: Proc. 34th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. (ICRC2015), p. 917 (2015). DOI: 10.22323/1.236.0917

    doi:10.22323/1.236.0917 2015

  46. [46]

    Astrophysics Source Code Libraryascl:2203.007(2022)

    Hahn, J., Romoli, C., Breuhaus, M.: GAMERA: Source modeling in gamma astronomy. Astrophysics Source Code Libraryascl:2203.007(2022). https:// ascl.net/2203.007

    2022

  47. [47]

    Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series247, 33 (2020) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb arXiv:1902.10045

    Abdollahi, S.,et al.(Fermi-LAT Collaboration): Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series247, 33 (2020) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb arXiv:1902.10045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series260, 53 (2022) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751 arXiv:2201.11184

    Abdollahi, S.,et al.(Fermi-LAT Collaboration): Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series260, 53 (2022) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751 arXiv:2201.11184

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2307.12546

    Ballet, J., Bruel, P., Burnett, T.H., Lott, B., The Fermi-LAT collaboration: Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4). arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2307.12546

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716–723 (1974) DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716–723 (1974) DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    arXiv 1974

  51. [51]

    Astronomical Journal129, 1993–2006 (2005) DOI: 10.1086/428488 arXiv:astro-ph/0412641

    Manchester, R.N., Hobbs, G.B., Teoh, A., Hobbs, M.: The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue. Astronomical Journal129, 1993–2006 (2005) DOI: 10.1086/428488 arXiv:astro-ph/0412641

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  52. [52]

    Astrophysical Journal843, 139 (2017) DOI: 10.3847/1538- 4357/aa775a arXiv:1702.00476

    Ackermann, M.,et al.(Fermi-LAT Collaboration): Search for Extended Sources in the Galactic Plane Using Six Years of Fermi-Large Area Telescope Pass 8 Data above 10 GeV. Astrophysical Journal843, 139 (2017) DOI: 10.3847/1538- 4357/aa775a arXiv:1702.00476

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society434, 2289–2294 (2013) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1170 arXiv:1306.5642

    Ohm, S., Hinton, J.A., White, R.:γ-ray emission from the Westerlund 1 region. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society434, 2289–2294 (2013) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1170 arXiv:1306.5642

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics656, 81 (2021) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202141553 arXiv:2109.07443

    Bruel, P.: A new method to perform data-model comparison inFermi- LAT analysis. Astronomy & Astrophysics656, 81 (2021) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202141553 arXiv:2109.07443

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics695, 3 (2025) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202451964 arXiv:2501.12990

    Haubner, K.,et al.: eROSITA X-ray analysis of the PeVatron candidate Westerlund 1. Astronomy & Astrophysics695, 3 (2025) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/202451964 arXiv:2501.12990

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Astrophysical Journal885, 131 (2019) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11 arXiv:1910.03357 27

    Reid, M.J.,et al.: Trigonometric Parallaxes of High-mass Star-forming Regions: Our View of the Milky Way. Astrophysical Journal885, 131 (2019) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11 arXiv:1910.03357 27

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Astrophysical Journal699, 1153 (2009) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1153 arXiv:0905.0723

    Roman-Duval, J.,et al.: Kinematic Distances to Molecular Clouds identified in the Galactic Ring Survey. Astrophysical Journal699, 1153 (2009) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1153 arXiv:0905.0723

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Astronomy & Astro- physics625, 10 (2019) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 arXiv:1904.05721

    Abuter, R.,et al.(GRA VITY Collaboration): A geometric distance measurement to the Galactic center black hole with 0.3% uncertainty. Astronomy & Astro- physics625, 10 (2019) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 arXiv:1904.05721

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics397, 133–146 (2003) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361:20021504

    Russeil, D.: Star-forming complexes and the spiral structure of our Galaxy. Astronomy & Astrophysics397, 133–146 (2003) DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361:20021504

    doi:10.1051/0004- 2003

  60. [60]

    Astrophysical Journal760, 65 (2012) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/65 arXiv:1209.6427

    Fok, T.K.T., Nakashima, J., Yung, B.H.K., Hsia, C., Deguchi, S.: Maser Observa- tions of Westerlund 1 and Comprehensive Considerations on Maser Properties of Red Supergiants Associated with Massive Clusters. Astrophysical Journal760, 65 (2012) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/65 arXiv:1209.6427

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics468, 993–1000 (2007) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077309 arXiv:0704.3073

    Kothes, R., Dougherty, S.M.: The distance and neutral environment of the massive stellar cluster Westerlund 1. Astronomy & Astrophysics468, 993–1000 (2007) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077309 arXiv:0704.3073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [62]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences8, 103 (2021) DOI: 10.3389/fspas.2021.671670 arXiv:2110.04446

    Hou, L.G.: The spiral structure in the Solar neighbourhood. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences8, 103 (2021) DOI: 10.3389/fspas.2021.671670 arXiv:2110.04446

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Radia- tion fields and application to high-energy astrophysics

    Popescu, C.C.,et al.: A radiation transfer model for the Milky Way: I. Radia- tion fields and application to high-energy astrophysics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society470, 2539–2558 (2017) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1282 arXiv:1705.06652 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017