Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Age of Westerlund 1 Revisited

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.02609 v1 pith:SF47WLJL submitted 2021-03-03 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

The Age of Westerlund 1 Revisited

classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords stellarstarsmodelscloseclustercsgsevolutionexplain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The cluster Westerlund~1 (Wd1) is host to a large variety of post main-sequence (MS) massive stars. The simultaneous presence of these stars can only be explained by stellar models if the cluster has a finely-tuned age of 4-5Myr, with several published studies independently claiming ages within this range. At this age, stellar models predict that the cool supergiants (CSGs) should have luminosities of $\log(L/L_\odot) \approx 5.5$, close to the empirical luminosity limit. Here, we test that prediction using archival data and new photometry from SOFIA to estimate bolometric luminosities for the CSGs. We find that these stars are on average 0.4dex too faint to be 5Myr old, regardless of which stellar evolution model is used, and instead are indicative of a much older age of $10.4^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$Myr. We argue that neither systematic uncertainties in the extinction law nor stellar variability can explain this discrepancy. In reviewing various independent age estimates of Wd1 in the literature, we firstly show that those based on stellar diversity are unreliable. Secondly, we re-analyse Wd1's pre-MS stars employing the Damineli extinction law, finding an age of $7.2^{+1.1}_{-2.3}$Myr; older than that of previous studies, but which is vulnerable to systematic errors that could push the age close to 10Myr. However, there remains significant tension between the CSG age and that inferred from the eclipsing binary W13. We conclude that stellar evolution models cannot explain Wd1 under the single age paradigm. Instead, we propose that the stars in the Wd1 region formed over a period of several Myr.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A cosmic-ray loaded nascent outflow driven by a massive star cluster

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Fermi-LAT detects an extended GeV gamma-ray source and an H I cavity near Westerlund 1, interpreted as a cosmic-ray-loaded outflow leaving the Galactic disc.

  2. Identifying and Determining Atmospheric Parameters of BHB Stars Based on LAMOST DR11

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A catalog of 13,988 BHB spectra (10,236 unique stars) from LAMOST DR11 with SLAM-based atmospheric parameters, using color indices to break the Teff–logg degeneracy.