Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

For heterotic compactifications with a smooth α'→0 limit, the moduli-space metric gains exactly one explicit correction at order α'^2 — a torsion-induced cross term mixing complex-structure and hermitian deformations — while the Kähler pote

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

The heterotic moduli-space metric picks up a torsion-induced complex-structure–hermitian mixing term at order α'^2, while the Kähler potential keeps its functional form.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid α'^2 metric computation; Kähler-potential invariance claimed but not proven. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15817 v1 pith:IMMJIZ46 submitted 2026-07-17 hep-th math.DG

Heterotic moduli, the double extension and the alpha'² metric

Jock McOrist , Qianhe Yin This is my paper
classification hep-th math.DG MSC 32G2032Q2583E30 PACS 11.25.-w
keywords heterotic string theorymoduli space metricalpha-prime correctionsHull connectiontorsiondouble extensionKähler potentialStrominger system
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper computes the metric on the moduli space of heterotic string compactifications through second order in α', the string-length-squared expansion parameter. For backgrounds with a smooth α'→0 limit, the authors find that the Kähler potential keeps exactly its classical form, but the metric itself gains one explicit correction: a torsion-induced term that mixes deformations of the complex structure with deformations of the hermitian structure. The correction comes from the deformation of the Hull connection, the composite torsionful connection fixed by supersymmetry, and is the only new term at this order after all other candidates cancel or push to α'^3. The paper also clarifies the roles of the extension bundle (organizing F-term constraints), the D-term conditions (selecting physical representatives), and the string-derived metric (supplying the inner product), arguing that 'hermitian modulus' labels only the leading component of a coupled deformation.

Core claim

The central claim is that for a heterotic background admitting a smooth α'→0 limit (so H = O(α') and supersymmetry retains the Hull–Strominger form with the composite Hull connection Θ_H = Θ_LC + ½H), the moduli-space metric through order α'^2 is given exactly by the known first-order terms plus a single explicit correction: (α'/8)∫_X [(∇_ρ H_{μλ}^κ) Δ_{αρλ} Z_{βμκ} + h.c.], with Δ the complex-structure deformation and Z the complexified hermitian deformation. This torsion-induced cross term arises from the (2,0) and (0,2) components of the Levi–Civita curvature of the non-Kähler metric, evaluated when the norm of the deformed Hull connection is expanded. All other candidate corrections — tr

What carries the argument

The Hull connection Θ_H = Θ_LC + ½H — the composite torsionful spin connection appearing in the Bergshoeff–de Roo action and Green–Schwarz Bianchi identity — is the engine of the calculation. Because supersymmetry fixes it rather than treating it as an independent field, its variation is determined by the physical deformations (Z, a, Δ). The paper computes DΘ_H through order α', then evaluates its L² norm; the non-Kähler background's Riemann tensor develops (2,0)/(0,2) components proportional to ∇H, and these produce the torsion-induced Δ–Z cross term. The paper also relies on the double extension 0→T*^(1,0)X→Q→Q₁→0, with Q₁ built from End E and T^(1,0)X; the associated differential D packag

Load-bearing premise

The compactification must have a smooth α'→0 limit, so the three-form flux H is of order α' and the supersymmetry conditions keep the Hull–Strominger form with the composite Hull connection; without that, the deformation formula, the dropping of traced flux terms, and the claim that explicit Chern–Simons corrections enter only at α'^3 all fail.

What would settle it

A three-loop (order α'^2) computation of the Zamolodchikov metric on a heterotic sigma model with torsion — for instance on a non-Kähler (2,2) background admitting a smooth limit — that finds any additional explicit α'^2 term beyond the paper's equation (5.2), especially a pure bundle-modulus term or a change in the Kähler potential, would refute the central claim. Equivalently, an explicit background with H of order one (violating the smooth-limit premise) that exhibits new α'^2 corrections would show the load-bearing assumption is essential.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Through α'^2, the heterotic moduli-space metric is known completely on smooth-limit backgrounds, giving a concrete target for independent sigma-model or scattering-amplitude checks.
  • The Kähler potential's form survives, so the α'^2 correction is not a quantum modification of the potential but a change in which representatives are physical — it shows up in kinetic mixing, not in the prepotential.
  • A 'hermitian modulus' cannot be varied alone: preserving supersymmetry forces simultaneous complex-structure and bundle deformations, and the metric's orthogonal decomposition (Schur complement) must be performed with the full physical representatives.
  • The mixed kinetic term defines a field-space connection A and curvature R on moduli space; R encodes whether the hermitian directions form a genuine fibration, a question the paper poses for explicit families of vacua.
  • At the standard embedding F = R, the cohomology decomposes into hermitian, bundle, and complex-structure classes, but the physical representatives and the α'^2 metric keep those classes coupled.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the absence of an explicit α'^2 correction to the bundle-modulus metric is a consequence of the composite nature of the Hull connection together with the specific supersymmetry algebra at this order; at α'^3, independent quartic invariants could break this pattern, as the paper itself notes.
  • Because the argument rests on H = O(α'), backgrounds that do not admit a smooth α'→0 limit — for example those stabilized at nonzero flux — could exhibit additional α'^2 corrections, and the paper's method would need modification there.
  • The bZ = Z + (α'/2)P_Z T(Δ) redefinition suggests a natural field-coordinate shift toward diagonalizing the metric, but the paper shows it captures only the projected part; a full diagonalization would presumably require a field-dependent redefinition including the induced a_ρ and Δ_ρ components.
  • A concrete next step implied by the paper: evaluate the connection A and curvature R on an explicit family of heterotic vacua to decide whether the hermitian moduli define a fibration, potentially connecting with special-geometry and mirror-symmetry questions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the moduli-space metric of heterotic compactifications admitting a smooth α'→0 limit, through order α'^2. Starting from the Hull–Strominger/Bergshoeff–de Roo system, it evaluates the deformation of the composite Hull connection and performs a dimensional reduction of the kinetic terms. The main formula is Eq. (5.2): the known α'^0 and α'^1 terms plus a new torsion-induced cross term (α'/8)∫[(∇_ρ H_{μλ}^κ) Δ_{αρλ} Z_{βμκ}+h.c.]. The authors claim that the Kähler potential is unchanged to O(α'^3), and they discuss how the double extension, F-terms, D-terms, and a Gram–Schmidt/horizontal decomposition organize the corrected metric.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial step: an explicit, parameter-free α'^2 correction to the heterotic moduli metric, with a clean geometric interpretation in terms of the composite Hull connection. The computation in §§3–4 and Appendix A is detailed and mostly self-consistent, and the paper is careful to separate the string-derived metric from mathematical pairings on enlarged moduli problems. The main unresolved issue is the Kähler-potential invariance claim, which is asserted in the abstract and Eq. (1.1) but not derived in the body; this is the principal obstacle to accepting the headline result as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1 and Appendix A] The abstract and Eq. (1.1) claim that the Kähler potential is unchanged to O(α'^3). The body, however, computes only the metric g^♯ by dimensional reduction; it never constructs K or verifies that the metric (5.2) is Kähler and equal to ∂_α∂_β̄ K0 through α'^2. The new torsion-induced term must be checked to be compatible with K0 after the α'-dependence of Ω, ω, and the F/D-term gauge fixing is taken into account. The shifted variable bZ in (5.26) does not close this gap, since the authors explicitly state that bZ is not a physical field redefinition, and the Gram–Schmidt procedure in §5.3 removes the mixed term only pointwise. If g^♯ is not the metric of an unchanged K, the headline claim fails. Please either provide a derivation of the Kähler-potential invariance or modify the claim to state only the metric result (5.2).
  2. [§2.1, Appendix A] The central derivation is conditional on H=O(α') and on the Hull–Strominger form of the supersymmetry conditions under a smooth α'→0 limit. This assumption is imported from [22] and is used at load-bearing points: dropping the traced dH terms in (A.11) via constant dilaton gauge, asserting Δ_[μν]=O(α'), and concluding that the (2,0)/(0,2) components of DΘH start at α'. If H need not be O(α'), then Eq. (3.11), the reduction leading to (4.13), and the statement that explicit Chern–Simons corrections enter only at α'^3 all fail. The paper states the assumption clearly, but it does not reproduce or delimit the theorem from [22]. I ask that the paper explicitly label this as an imported theorem and specify the class of backgrounds for which it has been proved.
  3. [§5.2] The construction of physical representatives via D-harmonic forms assumes that the double-extension complex is elliptic and that the infinitesimal deformation classes are unobstructed. Unobstructedness is assumed, not proved, and is used to assert that every relevant class has a harmonic representative and hence that the metric (5.2) is evaluated on genuine tangent vectors to the moduli space. This is a legitimate limitation for a local computation, but it should be stated in the theorem/abstract rather than only in the body. If the intended claim is formal in nature, the paper should say so explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Refs] Reference [34] is incomplete: it has no journal, arXiv number, or year. Please update.
  2. [Global] The symbol α′ is rendered as “α ‵” throughout the manuscript, apparently a typesetting/OCR issue. Please fix for consistency.
  3. [§5.4] The curvature R of the horizontal splitting is denoted with the same symbol R as the Riemann curvature used earlier. Consider using a different notation (e.g., R^hor or ℜ) to avoid confusion.
  4. [§2.3] The right-contraction convention in Eq. (2.17) is non-standard and contributes to several sign subtleties. A short worked example would help the reader verify the signs in (3.11) and (4.9).
  5. [§5.3] The discussion of bZ in (5.26)–(5.27) is potentially misleading because the disavowal appears only after the identity. Consider moving the statement that bZ is not a new field or a physical field redefinition to just before (5.26).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction; the α'^2 correction is computed from the action and the cited prior results are independent theorems/calculations.

full rationale

The central α'^2 correction in (5.2) is obtained by dimensional reduction (4.2)–(4.8) and evaluating the composite Hull-connection variation DΘH using (3.11); the new torsion-induced Δ–Z term comes from an explicit integral identity (A.18), not from an assumed answer. No parameter is fitted to the moduli-space metric, and no 'prediction' is a restatement of the action's input terms: the cross term (α'/8)∫[(∇ρH_{μλ}^κ)Δ_{αρλ}Z_{β μκ}+h.c.] arises in the derivation at (4.10) and is not imposed. The H=O(α') premise and the traced dH identity are taken from the authors' prior theorem [22]; because those results are stated as theorems with hypotheses (smooth α'→0 limit, Hull–Strominger form) that do not include the target metric, the citation is independent evidence rather than a circular import. Similarly, [21]/[28,29] supply the α'^0 metric and universal-geometry setup, which the paper extends. The abstract's Kähler-potential invariance is asserted rather than derived, and the Kählerity of (5.2) is not checked; however, that is an internal completeness/correctness gap, not a definitional circularity, since K is not defined as the potential that reproduces (5.2). The manuscript itself flags left-open checks (§5.2 nilpotency at α'^2; §5.4 evaluation of R; §6 curvature of the full metric), which further indicates acknowledged limits rather than circular reasoning. Overall, no exhibited reduction makes the output equivalent to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The hatted variable bZ is explicitly stated not to be a new field, and A and R are geometric constructs on the existing moduli space. No free parameters are fitted: α' is an expansion parameter, not adjusted to data.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Existence of a smooth α'→0 limit implies H=O(α') and supersymmetry equations retain Hull–Strominger form with the composite Hull connection.
    Invoked throughout; taken from the authors' earlier [22], not reproved here. Location: §1 and §2.1.
  • domain assumption The effective action is the Bergshoeff–de Roo action with the Hull connection in the Green–Schwarz term, and the connection's variation is fixed by physical fields.
    Basis of the metric computation; cited to [1,2,5–16] and treated as established string input. Location: §2.1.
  • domain assumption The supersymmetry identity g^{μλ}g^{τκ}(dH)_{μρλκ} = 4∇_ρ∇_τ Φ + O(α'^2) and the traced Ricci relation Ric_{μν} = -1/2 (dH)^ρ_{ρμν} + O(α'^2) are valid.
    Imported from [22]; used in Appendix A to reduce I_Δ and I_Z and drop dH/Ricci terms.
  • domain assumption The deformation problem is unobstructed at smooth points and the double-extension complex is elliptic, so D†D can be inverted on the orthogonal complement and harmonic representatives exist.
    Stated in §5.2/5.3; relies on [20,24,43] for ellipticity and on the smoothness assumption.
  • domain assumption The moduli-space metric from dimensional reduction is the Zamolodchikov metric (large-radius approximation) and is positive definite after quotienting null directions.
    Used to justify positivity of (4.8); cites [23,41,42].
  • domain assumption Constant dilaton gauge is admissible and the pure-gauge term vanishes.
    Used to drop ∇∇Φ contributions; references [3,4,22,36].

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heterotic moduli, the double extension and the alpha'^2 metric." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IMMJIZ46

@misc{pith2026260715817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heterotic moduli, the double extension and the alpha'^2 metric},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IMMJIZ46}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15817}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We compute the heterotic moduli-space metric through $\alpha'^2$ for backgrounds admitting a smooth $\alpha'\to0$ limit. The Kaehler potential is unchanged to this order, but the metric receives corrections from the deformation of the Hull connection which mixes complex structure and hermitian moduli. We discuss this and clarify the roles of the extension bundle, F-terms, the D-terms and the string-derived moduli space metric.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 24 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bergshoeff and M

    E. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo,The Quartic Effective Action of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry,Nucl.Phys.B328(1989) 439

    1989

  2. [2]

    Bergshoeff and M

    E. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo,Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Terms in Ten-Dimensions,Phys.Lett.B218(1989) 210

    1989

  3. [3]

    Hull,Compactifications of the Heterotic Superstring,Phys.Lett.B178(1986) 357

    C. Hull,Compactifications of the Heterotic Superstring,Phys.Lett.B178(1986) 357

    1986

  4. [4]

    Strominger,Superstrings with Torsion,Nucl

    A. Strominger,Superstrings with Torsion,Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 253

    1986

  5. [5]

    Cai and C.A

    Y. Cai and C.A. Nunez,Heterotic String Covariant Amplitudes and Low-energy Effective Action,Nucl. Phys. B287(1987) 279

    1987

  6. [6]

    Gross and J.H

    D.J. Gross and J.H. Sloan,The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B291(1987) 41

    1987

  7. [7]

    Metsaev and A.A

    R.R. Metsaev and A.A. Tseytlin,Curvature Cubed Terms in String Theory Effective Actions,Phys. Lett. B185(1987) 52

    1987

  8. [8]

    Hull and P.K

    C.M. Hull and P.K. Townsend,World Sheet Supersymmetry and Anomaly Cancellation in the Heterotic String,Phys. Lett. B178(1986) 187

    1986

  9. [9]

    Ross,Chern-simons Terms in theσModel for the Heterotic String,Nucl

    D.A. Ross,Chern-simons Terms in theσModel for the Heterotic String,Nucl. Phys. B286(1987) 93

    1987

  10. [10]

    Hull and P.K

    C.M. Hull and P.K. Townsend,The Two Loop Beta Function forσModels With Torsion,Phys. Lett. B191(1987) 115

    1987

  11. [11]

    Metsaev and A.A

    R. Metsaev and A.A. Tseytlin,Order alpha-prime (Two Loop) Equivalence of the String Equations of Motion and the Sigma Model Weyl Invariance Conditions: Dependence on the Dilaton and the Antisymmetric Tensor,Nucl. Phys. B293(1987) 385

    1987

  12. [12]

    Foakes, N

    A.P. Foakes, N. Mohammedi and D.A. Ross,Three Loop Beta Functions for the Superstring and Heterotic String,Nucl. Phys. B310(1988) 335

    1988

  13. [13]

    Foakes, N

    A.P. Foakes, N. Mohammedi and D.A. Ross,Effective Action and beta Function for the Heterotic String,Phys. Lett. B206(1988) 57

    1988

  14. [14]

    Ellwanger, J

    U. Ellwanger, J. Fuchs and M.G. Schmidt,The HeteroticσModel With Background Gauge Fields,Nucl. Phys. B314(1989) 175

    1989

  15. [15]

    Ellwanger, J

    U. Ellwanger, J. Fuchs and M.G. Schmidt,The HeteroticσModel in the Presence of Background Gauge Fields: Three Loop Results,Phys. Lett. B203(1988) 244

    1988

  16. [16]

    Chemissany, M

    W. Chemissany, M. de Roo and S. Panda,alpha’-Corrections to Heterotic Superstring Effective Action Revisited,JHEP08(2007) 037 [0706.3636]. 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Atiyah,Complex Analytic Connections in Fibre Bundles,Trans

    M.F. Atiyah,Complex Analytic Connections in Fibre Bundles,Trans. AMS85(1957) 181

    1957

  18. [18]

    de la Ossa and E.E

    X. de la Ossa and E.E. Svanes,Holomorphic Bundles and the Moduli Space of N=1 Supersymmetric Heterotic Compactifications,JHEP10(2014) 123 [1402.1725]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Anderson, J

    L.B. Anderson, J. Gray and E. Sharpe,Algebroids, Heterotic Moduli Spaces and the Strominger System,JHEP07(2014) 037 [1402.1532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    McOrist and E.E

    J. McOrist and E.E. Svanes,Heterotic quantum cohomology,JHEP11(2022) 096 [2110.06549]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Candelas, X

    P. Candelas, X. de la Ossa and J. McOrist,A Metric for Heterotic Moduli,Commun. Math. Phys.356(2017) 567 [1605.05256]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    McOrist and S

    J. McOrist and S. Picard,Stringy Corrections to Heterotic SU(3)-Geometry,Commun. Math. Phys.407(2026) 105 [2507.02388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730

    1986

  24. [24]

    McOrist, S

    J. McOrist, S. Picard and E.E. Svanes,A Heterotic Hermitian-Yang-Mills Equivalence, Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025) 107 [2402.10354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    de la Ossa, E

    X. de la Ossa, E. Hardy and E.E. Svanes,The Heterotic Superpotential and Moduli, JHEP01(2016) 049 [1509.08724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    McOrist,On the Effective Field Theory of Heterotic Vacua,Lett

    J. McOrist,On the Effective Field Theory of Heterotic Vacua,Lett. Math. Phys.108 (2018) 1031 [1606.05221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Ashmore, X

    A. Ashmore, X. De La Ossa, R. Minasian, C. Strickland-Constable and E.E. Svanes, Finite deformations from a heterotic superpotential: holomorphic Chern-Simons and anL ∞ algebra,JHEP10(2018) 179 [1806.08367]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    McOrist and R

    J. McOrist and R. Sisca,Small gauge transformations and universal geometry in heterotic theories,SIGMA16(2020) 126 [1904.07578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Candelas, X

    P. Candelas, X. De La Ossa, J. McOrist and R. Sisca,The Universal Geometry of Heterotic Vacua,JHEP02(2019) 038 [1810.00879]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Ashmore, C

    A. Ashmore, C. Strickland-Constable, D. Tennyson and D. Waldram,Heterotic backgrounds via generalised geometry: moment maps and moduli,JHEP11(2020) 071 [1912.09981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Garcia-Fernandez, R

    M. Garcia-Fernandez, R. Rubio and C. Tipler,Gauge theory for string algebroids,J. Diff. Geom.128(2024) 77 [2004.11399]

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Garcia-Fernandez and R

    M. Garcia-Fernandez and R. Gonzalez Molina,Harmonic metrics for the Hull-Strominger system and stability,Int. J. Math.35(2024) 2441008 [2301.08236]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Garcia-Fernandez and R

    M. Garcia-Fernandez and R. Gonzalez Molina,Futaki invariants and Yau’s Conjecture on the Hull-Strominger system,J. Reine Angew. Math.2025(2025) 221 [2303.05274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Wu,The aeppli parameter for the heterotic moduli,

    P.-L. Wu,The aeppli parameter for the heterotic moduli,

  35. [35]

    Picard and P.-L

    S. Picard and P.-L. Wu,Balanced and Aeppli Parameters for the Heterotic Moduli, 2401.05331

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Anguelova, C

    L. Anguelova, C. Quigley and S. Sethi,The Leading Quantum Corrections to Stringy Kahler Potentials,JHEP1010(2010) 065 [1007.4793]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Melnikov, R

    I.V. Melnikov, R. Minasian and S. Sethi,Heterotic fluxes and supersymmetry,JHEP 06(2014) 174 [1403.4298]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    McOrist,Universal geometry as an organising principle for heterotic moduli, 2606.31193

    J. McOrist,Universal geometry as an organising principle for heterotic moduli, 2606.31193

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    McOrist, M

    J. McOrist, M. Sticka and E.E. Svanes,The moduli of the universal geometry of heterotic moduli,2411.05350

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Lopes Cardoso, G

    G. Lopes Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata and D. Lust,BPS action and superpotential for heterotic string compactifications with fluxes,JHEP10(2003) 004 [hep-th/0306088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  41. [41]

    Kutasov,Geometry on the Space of Conformal Field Theories and Contact Terms, Phys

    D. Kutasov,Geometry on the Space of Conformal Field Theories and Contact Terms, Phys. Lett. B220(1989) 153

    1989

  42. [42]

    Friedan and A

    D. Friedan and A. Konechny,Curvature formula for the space of 2-d conformal field theories,JHEP09(2012) 113 [1206.1749]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    de Lázari, J.D

    H. de Lázari, J.D. Lotay, H.N. Sá Earp and E.E. Svanes,Local Descriptions of the Heterotic SU(3) Moduli Space,Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025) 177 [2409.04382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Chisamanga, J

    B. Chisamanga, J. McOrist, S. Picard and E.E. Svanes,The decoupling of moduli about the standard embedding,JHEP01(2025) 032 [2409.04350]. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.