Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Neural fields can transfer style from text or image to 2D, video, 3D, and 4D content with one shared recipe.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:54 UTC pith:5LNQSLZA

load-bearing objection A clean, honest extension of CLIPGaussian to INR backbones; the temporal-consistency claim is plausible but under-validated, and the 4D evaluation is too thin to support the universal claim. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16362 v1 pith:5LNQSLZA submitted 2026-07-17 cs.CV

OmniStyle-INR: Universal and Multimodal Style Transfer for INRs

Rafa{\l} Kajca , Micha{\l} Mizio{\l}ek , Kornel Howil , Rafa{\l} Tobiasz , Przemys{\l}aw Spurek This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords style transferimplicit neural representationneural fieldsCLIPVGGtemporal consistencyvideo stylization3D/4D scene stylization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

OmniStyle-INR tries to establish that implicit neural representations (INRs) — coordinate-to-signal networks used for images, video, radiance fields, and dynamic scenes — form a natural universal domain for style transfer. The paper's claim is that a single optimization recipe, built from CLIP-based style losses and a VGG content loss, can fine-tune a pretrained INR of any dimension (SIREN for images, PNeRV/DNeRV for video, TensoRF for 3D, HexPlane for 4D) using either a text prompt or a reference image as the style condition. A temporal loss that warps neighboring stylized frames via precomputed optical flow is added for dynamic inputs, which the authors say reduces flicker and improves frame-to-frame consistency. If this works, it would let the same plug-in stylizer ride on any INR backbone, inheriting compression, super-resolution, and continuity for free, and avoiding the pixel-density problem of explicit Gaussian representations on 2D and video data. The paper's own numbers are mostly competitive with the Gaussian approach on style and content metrics, with occasional wins on consistency and content fidelity.

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that the full-frame style objective — directional CLIP loss on whole renders, patch-level CLIP loss on random crops, VGG content loss, background regularization, and, for dynamic data, a masked temporal loss — transfers almost verbatim to implicit neural representations of any dimensionality. The key implementation move is to render complete frames in chunks during the loss pass, since CLIP and VGG need coherent spatial context that ray-based INR training does not provide. Stylization then becomes a fine-tuning step on the INR weights, so the original geometry and motion are preserved by construction while appearance changes are driven by the frozen vision

What carries the argument

The central object is the INR as a shared stylization canvas: a per-modality coordinate network (SIREN for 2D images, PNeRV or DNeRV for video, TensoRF for static 3D, HexPlane for 4D dynamic scenes) that is first trained to reconstruct the original signal and then fine-tuned under a frozen CLIP/VGG-19 guidance objective. Because text and image conditions are encoded into the same CLIP space, one optimization loop serves both. For video and 4D, RAFT optical-flow fields and occlusion masks are precomputed from the original sequence; during stylization the next frame is warped back to the current frame's coordinates and a masked MSE penalizes deviations, enforcing temporal stability where the f

Load-bearing premise

The temporal loss aligns neighboring stylized frames using optical flow and occlusion masks computed on the original, un-stylized sequence; if stylization changes edges or texture enough to invalidate that flow, misaligned pixels are matched and ghosting or frozen artifacts appear, and the video/4D consistency claims ride on this alignment holding.

What would settle it

Take a video or 4D sequence with fast motion and heavy occlusions, stylize it with strong text prompts, and compute masked RMSE between adjacent frames warped with flow from the original sequence versus flow re-estimated on the stylized frames; if the error rises steeply with stylization strength (or shows visible ghosting at high-contrast edges), the fixed-flow temporal alignment is the point of failure. A cheaper check: run the video model with the temporal loss on and off and compare CLIP-CONS and flow endpoint error on the same clip.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Any future improvement to INR backbones (faster training, better compression, higher super-resolution quality) transfers directly to stylization, since the style module is a plug-in on top of the reconstruction.
  • Text-prompt and reference-image stylization collapse into a single pipeline, because both conditions land in the shared CLIP embedding space.
  • For video and 4D scenes, the precomputed-flow temporal loss reduces frame-to-frame flicker without re-estimating motion during stylization, at least while the original motion estimate stays valid.
  • Stylized results inherit INR compression and can be rendered at arbitrary resolutions, which explicit point-based representations do not offer naturally for dense 2D/video domains.
  • The approach preserves the exact structure of the input (no hallucinated content) and is limited mainly by the aesthetic ceiling of CLIP/VGG guidance versus large diffusion models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the center-bias advantage over the explicit baseline is plausibly an artifact of full-frame rendering versus the baseline's padding strategy; a reader should test the same objective on a full-image Gaussian renderer before attributing the uniformity to INR-ness.
  • Editorial inference: the temporal loss as implemented is a pixel-space masked MSE on warped frames, which may over-smooth fine stylized texture; an LPIPS-based temporal term might keep detail and motion simultaneously.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's own CLIP-CONS numbers for video are mixed (e.g., 0.66 vs 1.92 in the text-conditioned table), so the 'significantly improved temporal consistency' claim is metric-sensitive; a direct flicker-judgment study would be the decisive test.
  • Editorial inference: the fixed-flow assumption inside the temporal loss is testable by re-estimating optical flow on the stylized frames — if the gap between original-flow warping error and stylized-flow warping error grows with style strength, the design's load-bearing premise would break.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes OmniStyle-INR, a style-transfer framework that fine-tunes pre-trained implicit neural representations (SIREN for images, PNeRV/DNeRV for video, TensoRF for 3D, HexPlane for 4D) using a weighted combination of CLIP directional and patch losses, a VGG content loss, a background loss, and, for dynamic inputs, an optical-flow-based temporal loss. The method supports both text and image style conditions. The authors evaluate each modality against a variety of baselines, with the main claimed contributions being universality across modalities and improved temporal consistency for video/4D, especially compared with CLIPGaussian.

Significance. If the claims held, the paper would offer a useful plug-in INR-based alternative to Gaussian-splatting style transfer, with the practical advantage of working on compact continuous representations and providing built-in temporal regularization. The authors also provide code, and the loss decomposition is clearly stated. However, the evidence is currently too thin to support the central 'universal, high-quality' claim: 4D evaluation is limited to one scene with no quantitative baseline comparison; 3D results trail CLIPGaussian on the main style metrics; and the temporal consistency evaluation shares its optical-flow assumption with the training loss. The CLIP-based metrics are also partially optimized by the CLIP losses. These issues are fixable, but they materially weaken the paper in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (5) and §A.1.8, §A.2.2] The temporal loss Lt warps the stylized next frame into the current frame using RAFT flow and occlusion masks computed from the original, un-stylized sequence. The same original-flow warping is then used to compute the consistency metrics in §A.2.2. This is load-bearing for the claimed advantage in Tables 1–2, but no experiment shows that the original flow remains the correct correspondence after stylization. If stylization changes edges/texture, the masked MSE can align wrong pixels and can be minimized by over-smoothing or freezing appearance. Please validate: estimate optical flow on stylized frames and report endpoint error vs. original flow, or use a correspondence-agnostic consistency metric, and ablate Lt with and without such validation.
  2. [§4.4, Figs. 7–8] The 4D evaluation uses a single sequence (coffee_martini) and provides no quantitative table comparing OmniStyle-INR against CLIPGaussian, 4DStyleGaussian, or Instruct 4D-to-4D. The statement that stylization quality is 'on par with CLIPGaussian' is therefore not substantiated. Please add quantitative results on at least 2–3 sequences with CLIP-based and consistency metrics, or explicitly label the 4D results as a proof-of-concept. Similarly, §4.3 evaluates 3D on only lego, hotdog, garden, and bonsai; this is too thin for the 'universal' claim.
  3. [§3.3 vs §A.2.1] CLIP-S, CLIP-SIM, and CLIP-CONS are computed with the same frozen CLIP encoder used in the directional loss Ld and patch loss Lp. The directional loss exactly maximizes CLIP-SIM, and the patch loss averages it over crops. Thus the main style-quality metrics are partially optimized by construction. Please report metrics that are not directly optimized by the loss (e.g., VGG/LPIPS-style similarity to the reference style, or human evaluation) or at minimum discuss this circularity when drawing conclusions against CLIPGaussian.
  4. [Table 3, §4.3] On text-conditioned 3D style transfer, OmniStyle-INR trails CLIPGaussian on CLIP-S (25.32 vs 26.86) and CLIP-SIM (21.16 vs 26.31); on image-conditioned style transfer it trails on CLIP-S (69.71 vs 72.65) and CLIP-SIM (19.04 vs 20.72). The conclusion that the method 'surpasses' CLIPGaussian on key metrics is not supported in the 3D setting. Please temper the claim or provide additional evidence/metrics where the advantage is clear.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, Tables 1–3] No standard deviations or number of runs are reported. Single-run differences of 0.1–1.5 CLIP points are hard to interpret as genuine improvements.
  2. [§3.3] The temporal loss is written as Lt = MSE(warp(R_{l+1}), R_l), but the actual loss in §A.1.8 is a masked MSE. This inconsistency should be fixed.
  3. [§3.1 and §A.1.6] The main text says optical flow is precomputed for video during Stage I, while §A.1.6 says video flow is computed dynamically during training. Clarify which procedure is used for the reported video results.
  4. [Appendix B, Tables 10–13] These tables appear as empty placeholders in the submitted version. If they are meant to contain qualitative ablation images, the images are missing.
  5. [Throughout] Minor typos: 'DA VIS' should be 'DAVIS'; the equation for Lp has mismatched parentheses and a stray 'I_l' after the sum.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Two headline metrics are the training objectives themselves: CLIP-SIM = 100(1−Ld) and RMSE consistency is derived from Lt, so Tables 1–2 partly reward optimizing the evaluation criterion.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§3.3 (Ld) vs §A.2.1 (CLIP-SIM)]
    "Ld(Rl, Il) = 1−cos(ΦCLIP(Rl)−ΦCLIP(Il), ΦCLIP(S)−ΦCLIP(“Photo”)). CLIP-SIM(R, I,S) = 100·cos(ΦI_CLIP(R)−ΦI_CLIP(I), ΦCLIP(S)−ΦCLIP(S0)), where S0 is a neutral source-domain condition, such as “Photo”."

    With S0="Photo" and the same frozen ViT-B/32 encoder, CLIP-SIM = 100(1−Ld) for the full render. Stage II minimizes Ld (and its patch version Lp), so the main style-quality metric in Table 1 is a rescaling of the training objective. A high CLIP-SIM is therefore forced by construction and does not independently verify style transfer quality; it directly reports how well the optimization minimized its own directional loss.

  2. fitted input called prediction [§3.3 (Lt) vs §A.2.2 (flow-warped RMSE)]
    "Lt =M SE(warp(Rl+1), Rl). Given two stylized frames R_t and R_{t+∆}, we warp R_{t+∆} into the coordinate system of R_t using optical flow estimated on the original sequence and remove unreliable pixels with an occlusion mask M_t. The masked RMSE is computed as RMSE = sqrt( Σ_x M_t(x)||R_t(x)−W(R_{t+∆})(x)||^2 / 2 Σ_x M_t(x) )."

    The short-range RMSE in Table 2 uses the same original-sequence optical flow, the same occlusion masks, and the same warping as the temporal loss Lt. For ∆=1 it is exactly sqrt(Lt) up to a constant. Since the paper's claimed advantage over CLIPGaussian is attributed to 'our explicit temporal loss,' the consistency numbers are the loss itself: they cannot validate the assumption that the pre-stylization flow remains correct after stylization, and they are biased toward the method that minimizes this exact objective.

full rationale

The core stylization procedure is not a derivation from its own conclusions: OmniStyle-INR genuinely fine-tunes INR weights under VGG content, patch/directional CLIP, background, and temporal losses, and it supplies qualitative comparisons and additional metrics. However, the two headline quantitative claims reduce by construction to the optimized objectives. CLIP-SIM is exactly 100(1−Ld) (same CLIP encoder, same "Photo" reference direction), and the short-range RMSE consistency metric is sqrt(Lt) (same flow, same masks, same warp). Hyperparameter choices are also selected on the same CLIP metrics (Tables 4–9), so the reported numbers are partly fitted. Independent evidence—CLIP-F, VGG-based content loss, qualitative figures, and the Farneback endpoint-error metric—keeps the paper from being wholly circular, and there is no load-bearing self-citation chain despite author overlap with CLIPGaussian. Score 6 reflects partial circularity in the evaluation of the paper's own claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

Load-bearing choices all come from prior INR architectures plus frozen CLIP/VGG; the central claim adds a recipe, not new physics or entities. The main free parameters are loss weights and patch settings tuned on the evaluation sets.

free parameters (4)
  • λc, λp, λd, λb, λt (loss weights) = 2D: λd=10-20, λp=90; 3D: λd=48, λp=2160; 4D: λd=64-96, λp=480-600; λc=5; λb unstated
    Chosen by grid-search ablation on the same evaluation scenes/prompts (Tables 4-9); these weights directly control how much style vs content appears, so the reported metrics depend on them.
  • patch_size, patch_num = 2D: 200/32; 3D: 256/100
    Selected by ablation on the same prompts/scenes used in main results (Tables 5, 9), so patch metrics are in-sample.
  • Occlusion threshold α, β in flow-consistency mask = not reported
    Equation A.1.7 includes constants α and β without values; the temporal loss depends on which pixels are treated as occluded.
  • Background loss weight λb and mask construction = not specified
    Lb appears in the loss but no default weight or mask construction is given; it affects stylization of backgrounds.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Frozen CLIP (ViT-B/32) and VGG-19 embeddings are universal style/content supervisors for all four modalities.
    Used throughout §3.2 and §3.3; no adaptation or per-modality retraining of the encoders; the whole method depends on these features capturing style and content.
  • domain assumption Each per-modality INR (SIREN, PNeRV/DNeRV, TensoRF, HexPlane) reconstructs the source signal faithfully enough that fine-tuning only changes appearance.
    Stage I (§3.1) trains standard backbones; any reconstruction error becomes baked into the stylized output.
  • domain assumption Optimizing θ from θ0 with CLIP/VGG losses preserves geometry and motion while changing appearance.
    Stage II assumes the gradient signal will not destroy structure; no explicit geometry regularization except background/density freezing in some ablations (§3.2, B.2.2).
  • domain assumption Optical flow and occlusion masks from the original dynamic sequence are valid for the stylized sequence.
    Temporal loss uses precomputed or warped flow from Stage I (§3.2, A.1.7-A.1.8); this is the weakest assumption for video/4D.
  • domain assumption A single scene per modality or a few scenes is representative of the 'universal' claim.
    4D uses one DyNeRF sequence; 3D uses two synthetic objects and two real scenes; this supports the generality claim only weakly.
  • domain assumption CLIP text and image embeddings are comparable enough that one shared optimization works for both conditions.
    Depends on CLIP's joint embedding space, standard in the literature; not independently verified here.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19111 in / 15796 out tokens · 158690 ms · 2026-08-01T21:54:49.815349+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of OmniStyle-INR: Universal and Multimodal Style Transfer for INRs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5LNQSLZA

@misc{pith2026260716362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: OmniStyle-INR: Universal and Multimodal Style Transfer for INRs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5LNQSLZA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16362}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Style transfer remains a fundamental and highly important task across various data modalities, enabling creative manipulation conditioned by both reference images and textual descriptions. Recently, methods utilizing Gaussian Splatting have emerged as a unified representation for 2D images, video, 3D scenes, and 4D dynamics. However, representing videos and 2D images with Gaussian Splatting is structurally sub-optimal for dense continuous domains. The number of required Gaussians often approaches the total number of pixels, raising questions about the actual utility of such a representation for these specific modalities. In contrast, Implicit Neural Representations have established themselves as a much more popular and natural choice across all these data domains. Implicit Neural Representations naturally provide significant advantages, including data compression, inherent capabilities for super resolution, and seamless integration with deep generative models. To this end, we introduce OmniStyle-INR, a novel framework that leverages network-based continuous representations as a truly universal domain. Our approach successfully performs high-quality style transfer across all visual modalities, guided seamlessly by both text prompts and visual exemplars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16362 by Kornel Howil, Micha{\l} Mizio{\l}ek, Przemys{\l}aw Spurek, Rafa{\l} Kajca, Rafa{\l} Tobiasz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: OmniStyle-INR, a universal style transfer framework that supports a broad spectrum of data modalities, including images, videos, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of various 3D style transfer methods using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: OmniStyle-INR architecture in the case of a 4D dynamic scene. The process is divided into two stages. In the first stage, we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of image style transfer using text condition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of image style transfer using image condi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Text-conditioned 4D style transfer comparison on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Image-conditioned 4D style transfer comparison on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of video style transfer using image condi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of video style transfer using text condi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Full comparison of OmniStyle-INR (our) and baseline models in 3D style transfer, conditioned by text, on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Full comparison of OmniStyle-INR (our) and baseline models in 3D style transfer, conditioned by image, on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Effect of patch number and patch size on the performance of OmniStyle-INR on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Effect of λd and λp on the performance of OmniStyle-INR on lego and hotdog objects from NeRF-Synthetic dataset [35]. Objects are stylized with "Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh" and "Mosaic" prompts. λp 360 480 600 coffee 32 64 96 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Ablation study on coffee_martini using a ’Red Canna’ Prompt: effect of λd and λp. The differences are minimal, but changes in local stylization can be observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5470–5479, 2022. 7, 12, 13, 14

    2022

  2. [2]

    Hexplane: A fast representa- tion for dynamic scenes

    Ang Cao and Justin Johnson. Hexplane: A fast representa- tion for dynamic scenes. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 130–141, 2023. 2, 3, 4, 12, 13

    2023

  3. [3]

    Tensorf: Tensorial radiance fields

    Anpei Chen, Zexiang Xu, Andreas Geiger, Jingyi Yu, and Hao Su. Tensorf: Tensorial radiance fields. InEuropean con- ference on computer vision, pages 333–350. Springer, 2022. 4, 7, 12, 13

    2022

  4. [4]

    Nerv: Neural representations for videos.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:21557–21568, 2021

    Hao Chen, Bo He, Hanyu Wang, Yixuan Ren, Ser Nam Lim, and Abhinav Shrivastava. Nerv: Neural representations for videos.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:21557–21568, 2021. 2, 3

    2021

  5. [5]

    Hnerv: A hybrid neural representation for videos

    Hao Chen, Matthew Gwilliam, Ser-Nam Lim, and Abhi- nav Shrivastava. Hnerv: A hybrid neural representation for videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10270– 10279, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  6. [6]

    DGE: Di- rect Gaussian 3D Editing by Consistent Multi-view Editing

    Minghao Chen, Iro Laina, and Andrea Vedaldi. DGE: Di- rect Gaussian 3D Editing by Consistent Multi-view Editing. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 74–92, 2024. 2, 7, 14, 17

    2024

  7. [7]

    Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function

    Yinbo Chen, Sifei Liu, and Xiaolong Wang. Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8628–8638,

  8. [8]

    Stytr 2: Im- age style transfer with transformers

    Yingying Deng, Fan Tang, Weiming Dong, Chongyang Ma, Xingjia Pan, Lei Wang, and Changsheng Xu. Stytr 2: Im- age style transfer with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11326–11336, 2022. 5, 6

    2022

  9. [9]

    Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion

    Gunnar Farnebäck. Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion. InSCIA, pages 363–370, 2003. 12, 14

    2003

  10. [10]

    Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or

    Rinon Gal, Or Patashnik, Haggai Maron, Amit H. Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Stylegan-nada: Clip- guided domain adaptation of image generators.ACM Trans- actions on Graphics, 41(4):1–13, 2022. 7

    2022

  11. [11]

    SGSST: Scaling Gaussian Splatting Style Transfer

    Bruno Galerne, Jianling Wang, Lara Raad, and Jean-Michel Morel. SGSST: Scaling Gaussian Splatting Style Transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 26535–26544,

  12. [12]

    Im- age style transfer using convolutional neural networks

    Leon A Gatys, Alexander S Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. Im- age style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2414–2423, 2016. 2, 3, 5, 6

    2016

  13. [13]

    Two birds, one stone: A unified framework for joint learning of image and video style transfers

    Bohai Gu, Heng Fan, and Libo Zhang. Two birds, one stone: A unified framework for joint learning of image and video style transfers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pages 23545–23554,

  14. [14]

    Instruct-nerf2nerf: Edit- ing 3d scenes with instructions

    Ayaan Haque, Matthew Tancik, Alexei A Efros, Aleksander Holynski, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Instruct-nerf2nerf: Edit- ing 3d scenes with instructions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 19740–19750, 2023. 2, 3, 7, 14

    2023

  15. [15]

    CLIPScore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning

    Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. CLIPScore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning. InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing, pages 7514–7528, 2021. 7

    2021

  16. [16]

    Clip- gaussian: Universal and multimodal style transfer based on gaussian splatting.Advances in neural information process- ing systems, 38:112125–112168, 2026

    Kornel Howil, Joanna Waczynska, Piotr Borycki, Tadeusz Dziarmaga, Marcin Mazur, and Przemysław Spurek. Clip- gaussian: Universal and multimodal style transfer based on gaussian splatting.Advances in neural information process- ing systems, 38:112125–112168, 2026. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 17, 18

    2026

  17. [17]

    Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization

    Xun Huang and Serge Belongie. Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization. InProceed- ings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 1501–1510, 2017. 5, 6

    2017

  18. [18]

    Stylizednerf: consistent 3d scene stylization as styl- ized nerf via 2d-3d mutual learning

    Yi-Hua Huang, Yue He, Yu-Jie Yuan, Yu-Kun Lai, and Lin Gao. Stylizednerf: consistent 3d scene stylization as styl- ized nerf via 2d-3d mutual learning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 18342–18352, 2022. 3

    2022

  19. [19]

    Stylesplat: 3d object style transfer with gaussian splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09473, 2024

    Sahil Jain, Avik Kuthiala, Prabhdeep Singh Sethi, and Prakanshul Saxena. Stylesplat: 3d object style transfer with gaussian splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09473, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Gainer: Geometry-aware implicit network representation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20924, 2025

    Weronika Jakubowska, Mikołaj Zieli ´nski, Rafał Tobiasz, Krzysztof Byrski, Maciej Zi˛ eba, Dominik Belter, and Prze- mysław Spurek. Gainer: Geometry-aware implicit network representation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20924, 2025. 2, 3

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Neural style transfer: A review

    Yongcheng Jing, Yezhou Yang, Zunlei Feng, Jingwen Ye, Yizhou Yu, and Mingli Song. Neural style transfer: A review. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 26(11):3365–3385, 2019. 2, 3

    2019

  22. [22]

    Fresh: Frequency shift- ing for accelerated neural representation learning

    Adam Kania, Marko Mihajlovic, Sergey Prokudin, Jacek Tabor, and Przemysław Spurek. Fresh: Frequency shift- ing for accelerated neural representation learning. InIn- ternational Conference on Learning Representations, pages 76383–76406, 2025. 2, 3

    2025

  23. [23]

    Text2video-zero: Text- to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators

    Levon Khachatryan, Andranik Movsisyan, Vahram Tade- vosyan, Roberto Henschel, Zhangyang Wang, Shant Navasardyan, and Humphrey Shi. Text2video-zero: Text- to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15954–15964, 2023. 6, 7, 9

    2023

  24. [24]

    G-style: Stylized gaussian splatting

    Áron Samuel Kovács, Pedro Hermosilla, and Renata G Raidou. G-style: Stylized gaussian splatting. InComputer Graphics Forum, page e15259. Wiley Online Library, 2024. 2, 3, 7, 14, 18

    2024

  25. [25]

    Clipstyler: Image style transfer with a single text condition

    Gihyun Kwon and Jong Chul Ye. Clipstyler: Image style transfer with a single text condition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18062–18071, 2022. 5, 6

    2022

  26. [26]

    Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video

    Tianye Li, Mira Slavcheva, Michael Zollhöfer, Simon Green, Christoph Lassner, Changil Kim, Tanner Schmidt, Steven Lovegrove, Michael Goesele, Richard Newcombe, and Zhaoyang Lv. Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5521– 5531, 2022. 7, 8, 9, 15

    2022

  27. [27]

    4dstylegaussian: Generalizable 4d style transfer with gaussian splatting.Pattern Recognition, page 112422, 2025

    Wanlin Liang, Hongbin Xu, Weitao Chen, Feng Xiao, and Wenxiong Kang. 4dstylegaussian: Generalizable 4d style transfer with gaussian splatting.Pattern Recognition, page 112422, 2025. 7

    2025

  28. [28]

    Lawrence Zitnick

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014. 5, 6

    2014

  29. [29]

    Stylerf: Zero-shot 3d style transfer of neural radiance fields

    Kunhao Liu, Fangneng Zhan, Yiwen Chen, Jiahui Zhang, Yingchen Yu, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik, Shijian Lu, and Eric P Xing. Stylerf: Zero-shot 3d style transfer of neural radiance fields. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8338– 8348, 2023. 3, 7

    2023

  30. [30]

    Stylegaussian: Instant 3d style transfer with gaussian splatting

    Kunhao Liu, Fangneng Zhan, Muyu Xu, Christian Theobalt, Ling Shao, and Shijian Lu. Stylegaussian: Instant 3d style transfer with gaussian splatting. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Technical Communications, New York, NY , USA, 2024. As- sociation for Computing Machinery. 2, 3, 7, 14, 18

    2024

  31. [31]

    AdaAttN: Revisit Attention Mechanism in Arbitrary Neural Style Transfer

    Songhua Liu, Tianwei Lin, Dongliang He, Fu Li, Meiling Wang, Xin Li, Zhengxing Sun, Qian Li, and Errui Ding. AdaAttN: Revisit Attention Mechanism in Arbitrary Neural Style Transfer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 6649– 6658, 2021. 6

    2021

  32. [32]

    ABC-GS: Alignment-Based Controllable Style Transfer for 3D Gaussian Splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22218, 2025

    Wenjie Liu, Zhongliang Liu, Xiaoyan Yang, Man Sha, and Yang Li. ABC-GS: Alignment-Based Controllable Style Transfer for 3D Gaussian Splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22218, 2025. 7, 14

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Finer: Flexi- ble spectral-bias tuning in implicit neural representation by variable-periodic activation functions

    Zhen Liu, Hao Zhu, Qi Zhang, Jingde Fu, Weibing Deng, Zhan Ma, Yanwen Guo, and Xun Cao. Finer: Flexi- ble spectral-bias tuning in implicit neural representation by variable-periodic activation functions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2713–2722, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  34. [34]

    Regs: Reference- based controllable scene stylization with gaussian splatting

    Yiqun Mei, Jiacong Xu, and Vishal Patel. Regs: Reference- based controllable scene stylization with gaussian splatting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 4035–4061, 2024. 3

    2024

  35. [35]

    Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. InECCV, 2020. 3, 7, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20

    2020

  36. [36]

    Instruct 4d-to-4d: Editing 4d scenes as pseudo-3d scenes using 2d diffusion

    Linzhan Mou, Jun-Kun Chen, and Yu-Xiong Wang. Instruct 4d-to-4d: Editing 4d scenes as pseudo-3d scenes using 2d diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20176–20185, 2024. 7

    2024

  37. [37]

    Snerf: stylized neural implicit representations for 3d scenes.ACM Transac- tions on Graphics (TOG), 41(4):1–11, 2022

    Thu Nguyen-Phuoc, Feng Liu, and Lei Xiao. Snerf: stylized neural implicit representations for 3d scenes.ACM Transac- tions on Graphics (TOG), 41(4):1–11, 2022. 3

    2022

  38. [38]

    Vist3d: Video stylization with 3d cnn.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:41651–41662, 2023

    Ayush Pande and Gaurav Sharma. Vist3d: Video stylization with 3d cnn.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:41651–41662, 2023. 6, 7

    2023

  39. [39]

    A benchmark dataset and evaluation methodology for video object segmentation

    Federico Perazzi, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Brian McWilliams, Luc Van Gool, Markus Gross, and Alexander Sorkine-Hornung. A benchmark dataset and evaluation methodology for video object segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 724– 732, 2016. 6, 7, 9

    2016

  40. [40]

    D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes

    Albert Pumarola, Enric Corona, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Francesc Moreno-Noguer. D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10318–10327, 2021. 2, 3

    2021

  41. [41]

    Learning Transferable Vi- sual Models From Natural Language Supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning Transferable Vi- sual Models From Natural Language Supervision. InIn- ternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 8748–8763, 2021. 12

    2021

  42. [42]

    Very deep con- volutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep con- volutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015. 12

    2015

  43. [43]

    Implicit neural representa- tions with periodic activation functions.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:7462–7473, 2020

    Vincent Sitzmann, Julien Martel, Alexander Bergman, David Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. Implicit neural representa- tions with periodic activation functions.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:7462–7473, 2020. 2, 3, 4

    2020

  44. [44]

    Vegas: Video gaussian splatting.Information Sciences, page 123033, 2025

    Weronika Smolak-Dy ˙zewska, Dawid Malarz, Kornel Howil, Jan Kaczmarczyk, Marcin Mazur, and Przemysław Spurek. Vegas: Video gaussian splatting.Information Sciences, page 123033, 2025. 2, 3

    2025

  45. [45]

    Style3d: Attention-guided multi-view style transfer for 3d object generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03571,

    Bingjie Song, Xin Huang, Ruting Xie, Xue Wang, and Qing Wang. Style3d: Attention-guided multi-view style transfer for 3d object generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03571,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Hy- pernetwork approach to generating point clouds

    Przemysław Spurek, Sebastian Winczowski, Jacek Tabor, Maciej Zamorski, Maciej Zieba, and Tomasz Trzcinski. Hy- pernetwork approach to generating point clouds. InInterna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9099–9108. PMLR, 2020. 2

    2020

  47. [47]

    Fastclipstyler: Optimisation-free text-based image style transfer using style representations

    Ananda Padhmanabhan Suresh, Sanjana Jain, Pavit Noinongyao, Ankush Ganguly, Ukrit Watchareeruetai, and Aubin Samacoits. Fastclipstyler: Optimisation-free text-based image style transfer using style representations. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 7316–7325, 2024. 5, 6

    2024

  48. [48]

    Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow

    Zachary Teed and Jia Deng. Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 402–419, 2020. 4, 6, 12

    2020

  49. [49]

    Instruct-GS2GS: Editing 3D Gaussian Splats with Instructions.arXiv preprint, 2024

    Cyrus Vachha and Ayaan Haque. Instruct-GS2GS: Editing 3D Gaussian Splats with Instructions.arXiv preprint, 2024. 7, 17

    2024

  50. [50]

    Mirage: Editable 2d images using gaussian splatting

    Joanna Waczynska, Tomasz Szczepanik, Piotr Borycki, Sla- womir Tadeja, Thomas Bohné, and Przemysław Spurek. Mirage: Editable 2d images using gaussian splatting. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, 2025. 2, 3

    2025

  51. [51]

    Nerf-art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization.IEEE Transactions on Visualiza- tion and Computer Graphics, 30(8):4983–4996, 2023

    Can Wang, Ruixiang Jiang, Menglei Chai, Mingming He, Dongdong Chen, and Jing Liao. Nerf-art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization.IEEE Transactions on Visualiza- tion and Computer Graphics, 30(8):4983–4996, 2023. 3

    2023

  52. [52]

    Consistent Video Style Transfer via Relaxation and Regular- ization.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29:9125– 9139, 2020

    Wenjing Wang, Shuai Yang, Jizheng Xu, and Jiaying Liu. Consistent Video Style Transfer via Relaxation and Regular- ization.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29:9125– 9139, 2020. 6

    2020

  53. [53]

    Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yixiao Ge, Xintao Wang, Stan Weixian Lei, Yuchao Gu, Yufei Shi, Wynne Hsu, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Mike Zheng Shou. Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 7623–7633, 2023. 7

    2023

  54. [54]

    Ccpl: Con- trastive coherence preserving loss for versatile style transfer

    Zijie Wu, Zhen Zhu, Junping Du, and Xiang Bai. Ccpl: Con- trastive coherence preserving loss for versatile style transfer. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 189–

  55. [55]

    Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation

    Shuai Yang, Yifan Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Chen Change Loy. Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2023. 6, 7, 9

    2023

  56. [56]

    Instantstylegaussian: Efficient art style transfer with 3d gaussian splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04249, 2024

    Xin-Yi Yu, Jun-Xin Yu, Li-Bo Zhou, Yan Wei, and Lin-Lin Ou. Instantstylegaussian: Efficient art style transfer with 3d gaussian splatting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04249, 2024. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Arf: Artistic radiance fields

    Kai Zhang, Nick Kolkin, Sai Bi, Fujun Luan, Zexiang Xu, Eli Shechtman, and Noah Snavely. Arf: Artistic radiance fields. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 717–733. Springer, 2022. 3

    2022

  58. [58]

    Dnerv: Model- ing inherent dynamics via difference neural representation for videos

    Qi Zhao, M Salman Asif, and Zhan Ma. Dnerv: Model- ing inherent dynamics via difference neural representation for videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2031– 2040, 2023. 3, 4, 13

    2031

  59. [59]

    a photo of the [style_prompt]

    Qi Zhao, M Salman Asif, and Zhan Ma. Pnerv: Enhanc- ing spatial consistency via pyramidal neural representation for videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19103– 19112, 2024. 3, 4, 13 A. Implementation Details and Evaluation Protocol A.1. Implementation Details In this section, we elaborate on se...

    2024

  60. [206]

    Springer, 2022. 6, 7, 9

    2022

  61. [1080]

    Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh

    For both text and image conditioned style transfer, patch_size= 256andpatch_num= 100yield the best overall performance. We additionally provide a visual representation of the study for the text conditioned setting in Figures 13 and 14. B.2.2. 4D Ablation Studies We further conduct ablation studies on a 4D scene (coffee_martini) from N3DV dataset [26] to a...

    arXiv 1979