REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 136 references
Einstein Probe's fast X-ray transients show no statistically significant gravitational-wave counterparts in the O4b LVK run, and the non-detections exclude binary neutron star mergers within ~178 Mpc and neutron star–black hole mergers with
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash
2026-08-01 20:58 UTC pith:H3SFYGON
load-bearing objection First systematic GW non-detection for EP-FXTs is believable, but the exclusion distances need recalibration before being quoted as constraints. the 3 major comments →
Detectability of Gravitational-wave counterparts of EP-FXTs observed during the O4b LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
This paper establishes that, in the first systematic cross-match between Einstein Probe fast X-ray transients and gravitational-wave candidates reported by the O4b all-sky searches, no association reaches statistical significance. Seven GW candidates fall inside the temporal windows around 47 FXTs; the observed number is consistent with the Poisson expectation of about 4.5 random overlaps, and a ranking statistic built from the GW sky-map probability at the FXT position and the candidate's coherent-vs-incoherent Bayes factor places every pair in the null distribution. On the detection side, if these FXTs came from binary neutron star or neutron star–black hole mergers, the full three-detecto
What carries the argument
The analysis rests on two tools. The first is a joint ranking statistic that treats each FXT–GW pair as a candidate association: it multiplies the overlap between the GW sky localization and the arcminute FXT position (essentially the GW localization probability density evaluated at the FXT coordinates) with a Bayes factor measuring whether the GW candidate is a coherent network signal rather than detector noise, then compares the result to a background built from 1000 scrambled sky positions per candidate. The second is the Targeted Detectability Range (TDR), which injects BNS and NSBH waveforms into the actual noise of whatever interferometers were online at the FXT's sky position across t
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing assumption is that a compact-binary signal with a matched-filter signal-to-noise above 10 would have been caught by the online all-sky searches, a threshold the paper motivates in Appendix A.2 from the catalog's p_astro>0.5 fraction rather than from a measured search efficiency; if the real searches are less efficient, the reported exclusion distances overstate how far away a merger could have been.
What would settle it
Run a coherent targeted search on the O4b data for the seven temporal coincidences; a recovered candidate with a false-alarm rate clearly below the estimated background at an FXT position would overturn the paper's no-counterpart claim, and measuring the actual all-sky search efficiency at signal-to-noise 10 finding it well below 90% would invalidate the reported exclusion distances.
If this is right
- The seven temporally coincident FXT–GW pairs are all consistent with random overlap; the best single candidate has a joint false-alarm rate of about 0.7 per year, not a detection.
- For a typical FXT with the full three-detector network online, a BNS merger within ~178 Mpc or an NSBH merger within ~349 Mpc at that sky position would have produced a detectable signal; the non-detection excludes such nearby mergers as the source.
- The 11 FXTs with measured redshifts mostly lie beyond their exclusion distances, so their non-detection is consistent with a compact-binary origin at their actual distances; only the closest source approaches the exclusion boundary, and only for the most massive NSBH model.
- Because TDR can be computed quickly and for single-detector configurations, it provides a low-latency way to decide whether a newly discovered FXT warrants deeper gravitational-wave follow-up.
- If the same pattern persists in longer joint observing runs with more sensitive detectors, the compact-binary interpretation of FXTs would be progressively constrained.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: the same TDR machinery could be inverted to set a population-level upper limit on the fraction of FXTs produced by BNS/NSBH mergers, rather than treating each source independently; that would require a distance distribution for the FXT population.
- Editorial inference: because the temporal window includes up to 1000 seconds before the X-ray trigger, FXTs whose X-rays lag the merger by more than about 17 minutes would be missed; a search allowing longer delays would test the magnetar and spin-down scenarios the paper enumerates.
- Editorial inference: a dedicated coherent targeted search could in principle recover subthreshold gravitational-wave signals that online all-sky pipelines miss, so the true exclusion distances could be somewhat larger than the reported values if such a search were run.
- Editorial inference: with future detector upgrades roughly tripling the sensitive volume, the same approach should either find an FXT–GW association within a few years or place strong limits on a compact-binary contribution to the FXT population.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper presents the first systematic search for gravitational-wave (GW) counterparts to fast X-ray transients (FXTs) detected by the Einstein Probe during the second half of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA fourth observing run (O4b). The authors assemble a sample of 47 EP-FXTs, exclude those associated with GRBs and flaring stars, and search for temporal coincidences with candidates in GWTC-5. They find seven temporal coincidences; using a ranking statistic based on sky overlap and coherent/incoherent Bayes factors, none of the seven associations is statistically significant, and the p-value distribution is consistent with the null hypothesis. In the absence of a confirmed association, the paper employs the Targeted Detectability Range (TDR) framework to estimate 90% exclusion distances for binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star-black hole (NSBH) mergers, reporting median values of roughly 178 Mpc and 349 Mpc respectively for the full three-detector network, and concludes that these constraints disfavor a nearby compact-binary merger origin for the sample.
Significance. The non-detection of a significant GW-FXT association is a robust and useful result, and the paper is, to my knowledge, the first systematic multi-messenger search of EP-FXTs against GWTC-5. The temporal-coincidence calculation is transparent and the ranking-statistic methodology follows prior published work. A clear strength is the public release of the TDR tool and Zenodo data products, which makes the analysis reproducible and useful for future joint EP-LVK studies. However, the quantitative exclusion-distance interpretation is not on the same footing as the null result: the TDR D90 values are computed with a matched-filter SNR threshold, and the paper does not demonstrate that this threshold faithfully represents the detection efficiency of the all-sky searches that produced GWTC-5. The redshift-distance interpretation in the conclusions also contains a logical error that overstates what the non-detections constrain. These issues affect the paper's central claims as stated in the abstract and conclusions, although the underlying null result is likely correct.
major comments (3)
- [§4 and Appendix A.2] The paper defines D90 as the distance at which 90% of injected signals have matched-filter SNR >= rho_cut, and then states that within D90 a CBC would have been detectable by the all-sky, all-time searches. This step is not justified. The TDR calculation injects waveforms and computes optimal matched-filter SNR against PSDs; it does not model the detection statistic, FAR threshold, or ranking procedures of PyCBC/GstLAL/MBTA. The Appendix A.2 calibration, based on the fraction of GWTC-5 candidates with p_astro>0.5 above SNR~10, measures catalog confidence, not detection efficiency: a real signal with SNR=10 can still fail to pass the all-sky FAR threshold because of noise fluctuations and the pipelines' ranking statistics. Moreover, the rho_cut=9 comparison with PyGRB in Ronchini et al. (2026) refers to a targeted search, which is more sensitive than all-sky. The quoted D90 values (~178 M
- [§6 vs §5] The conclusion bullet states that for the sources with measured redshifts 'these exclusion distances allow us to rule out the BNS and NSBH scenarios considered here,' with the main exception of EP240506a. This reverses the logic correctly stated in §5: for the ten sources other than EP240506a, the luminosity distance from the measured redshift is *greater* than D90, meaning the source lies beyond the GW sensitivity range and the non-detection is *consistent* with a BNS/NSBH origin, not evidence against it. Only a source with D_L <= D90 could be excluded. As written, the conclusion overstates the constraints and should be corrected.
- [§3.1 vs §6] Two different values for the expected number of chance temporal coincidences are reported: lambda=4.53 with p(K>=7)=0.172 in §3.1, and lambda=4.017 with p=0.112 in the conclusions. The §3.1 values follow from the stated Twin=62,837 s, N_GW=1619, and T_O4b=22,460,968 s; the conclusion values are not derivable from these inputs. Please determine which calculation is correct and use it consistently. The qualitative conclusion (no significant excess) is robust to either choice, but reporting both without explanation is a reproducibility problem.
minor comments (4)
- [Eq. (3)] The derivation of the joint FAR formula is unclear. Please clarify the role of R_FXT and why the temporal coincidence probability (1-exp(-R_GW dt_i)) is multiplied by p_i, which is computed from the sky-ranking background. A short derivation or reference would help the reader understand the units and assumptions.
- [§3.3] The background simulation draws 1000 random GW candidates and 1000 uniform sky positions per candidate. It is not stated whether each background realization uses the actual FXT sky positions or random positions; the text suggests random. Please specify this explicitly and justify the uniform-sky assumption against the EP sky-exposure function, which may not be uniform.
- [Table 1] The row for EP240703b appears malformed, with duplicated time intervals. Please check the formatting and ensure all entries are consistent with the text. Also, define all symbols (e.g., the asterisk for partial coverage) in the caption.
- [Fig. 3] The caption says 'Blank intervals correspond to times when the interferometer is on is observing mode.' The phrase 'on is' should be 'in.' More generally, clarify what blank intervals represent, as the text says the opposite.
Circularity Check
No circularity forces the null result; only a mild self-referential calibration in the TDR exclusion-distance threshold.
specific steps
-
other
[Section 4 (TDR) and Appendix A.2]
"As shown by (Ronchini et al. 2026), a value of ρcut=9 optimizes the match between D90 and the 90% exclusion distance obtained with PyGRB. However, we adopt a slightly more conservative cut ρcut=10, motivated by our inspection of the GWTC-5 catalog, where above SNR∼10 more than half of the events have pastro >0.5 (see Sec. A.2)."
The quantitative exclusion distances D90 are defined by the matched-filter SNR threshold ρcut, and ρcut is calibrated using the p_astro distribution of the same GWTC-5 catalog being searched, via a self-cited methodology (Ronchini et al. 2026). Thus the reported D90 values partly encode the catalog's own SNR/p_astro threshold rather than being a fully independent sensitivity measure. This is a mild self-consistency loop, not a forced reduction: D90 also depends on measured PSDs, antenna response, and injected waveforms, and the no-association result rests on independent coincidence counting and ranking-statistic p-values.
full rationale
The central null result is not circular: the paper searches GWTC-5 candidates against 47 FXTs with defined windows, computes λ=4.53 and p(K≥7)=0.172 from the candidate counts alone, and then uses an empirical background of 10^6 ranking-statistic realizations; all seven associations are consistent with chance (lowest joint FAR 0.71 yr^-1). These steps do not reuse the TDR or any fitted FXT parameter. The TDR exclusion distances are a forward injection model; the only self-referential element is the calibration of ρcut=10 from the p_astro distribution of the same catalog and the citation of a co-authored TDR paper, but that calibration is supported by an external PyGRB comparison (Ronchini et al. 2026) and does not force the null result. The skeptical concern that SNR>10 may overstate all-sky search efficiency is a correctness/validation risk, not circularity.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (6)
- BNS injection masses (m1=m2=1.4 M_sun) =
1.4, 1.4 M_sun
- NSBH injection masses (m_BH=10 M_sun, m_NS=1.4 M_sun) =
10, 1.4 M_sun
- Inclination prior 0<iota<45 deg =
0-45 deg
- Matched-filter SNR threshold rho_cut=10 =
10
- Temporal search window [T0-1000s, T0+T100] =
-1000 s to T100, with default T100=60 s when duration is missing
- FXT and GW trigger rates (R_FXT, R_GW) =
58.5 yr^-1, 2314 yr^-1
axioms (5)
- domain assumption GWTC-5 CBC candidates are uniformly distributed in time over O4b
- domain assumption The TDR D90 at rho_cut=10 approximates the 90% exclusion distance of the all-sky all-time searches
- domain assumption The Piotrzkowski et al. (2022) ranking statistic is applicable with B_n/s(EP)->0
- domain assumption Public EP trigger times and durations from GCN/ATel are accurate and unbiased
- domain assumption A CBC merger that produces an FXT emits GWs detectable by LVK within the assumed masses, inclination, and time window
read the original abstract
Fast X-ray transients (FXTs) detected by the Einstein Probe mission have emerged as a rapidly growing class of extragalactic transients, whose physical origin remains uncertain. Compact binary coalescence (CBC) systems have been proposed as one possible progenitor for at least a subset of these events, making FXTs promising targets for multi-messenger studies with gravitational-wave (GW) observations. This work presents the first systematic investigation of GW counterparts to FXTs observed by Einstein Probe and assesses the detectability of associated CBC. We focus on FXTs detected during the second half of the fourth observing run (O4b) of the Advanced LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detector network by searching for temporal coincidences with GW candidates from the fifth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-5). We analyze a sample of 47 FXTs, including 11 with measured redshifts, and assess the significance of the association between FXTs and GW candidates using a ranking statistic. We find no significant GW counterpart associated with any FXT in our sample. In the absence of a detection, we place 90% exclusion-distance constraints under the assumptions of binary neutron star and neutron star-black hole progenitor scenarios. For observations with the full LIGO and Virgo detector network, the typical median exclusion distances are $\sim$178 Mpc and $\sim$349 Mpc, respectively. These constraints disfavor a nearby compact-binary merger origin. Longer periods of joint observations by the LVK and Einstein Probe, combined with improved GW detector sensitivity, will enhance the prospects for identifying genuine GW-FXT associations and place tighter constraints on the progenitor scenarios of these events.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Extragalactic fast X-ray transient candidates discovered by Chandra (2000-2014). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243047 , archivePrefix =. 2201.07773 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
-
[2]
Extragalactic fast X-ray transient candidates discovered by Chandra (2014-2022). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345912 , archivePrefix =. 2304.13795 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[3]
Blasts from the Past: Supernova Shock Breakouts among X-Ray Transients in the XMM-Newton Archive. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba , archivePrefix =. 2004.09519 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
-
[4]
An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature06997 , archivePrefix =. 0802.1712 , primaryClass =
-
[5]
eRO-ExTra: eROSITA extragalactic non-AGN X-ray transients and variables in eRASS1 and eRASS2. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451253 , archivePrefix =. 2501.04208 , primaryClass =
-
[6]
Fast X-Ray Transients in NuSTAR Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3f31 , archivePrefix =. 2601.14375 , primaryClass =
-
[7]
A magnetar-powered X-ray transient as the aftermath of a binary neutron-star merger. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1079-5 , archivePrefix =. 1904.05368 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904
-
[8]
Discovery of a New Kind of Explosive X-Ray Transient near M86. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/14 , archivePrefix =. 1310.7238 , primaryClass =
-
[9]
Exploring the connection between compact object mergers and fast X-ray transients: The cases of LXT 240402A and EP250207b. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557612 , archivePrefix =. 2510.13015 , primaryClass =
-
[10]
Targeted coherent search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.084002 , archivePrefix =. 1012.4939 , primaryClass =
-
[11]
Improved methods for detecting gravitational waves associated with short gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.122004 , archivePrefix =. 1410.6042 , primaryClass =
-
[12]
New Journal of Physics , keywords =
X-Pipeline: an analysis package for autonomous gravitational-wave burst searches. New Journal of Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053034 , archivePrefix =. 0908.3665 , primaryClass =
-
[13]
Performance of an externally triggered gravitational-wave burst search. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.022003 , archivePrefix =. 1201.5599 , primaryClass =
-
[14]
Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =
Science objectives of the Einstein Probe mission. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-024-2600-3 , archivePrefix =. 2501.07362 , primaryClass =
-
[15]
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts during the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run and Implications for the Origin of GRB 150906B. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c47 , archivePrefix =. 1611.07947 , primaryClass =
-
[16]
Search for Gravitational-wave Signals Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts during the Second Observing Run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b48 , archivePrefix =. 1907.01443 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907
-
[17]
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts Detected by Fermi and Swift during the LIGO-Virgo Run O3a. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abee15 , archivePrefix =. 2010.14550 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[18]
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts Detected by Fermi and Swift during the LIGO-Virgo Run O3b. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac532b , archivePrefix =. 2111.03608 , primaryClass =
-
[19]
GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.18081 , archivePrefix =. 2508.18081 , primaryClass =
-
[20]
GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.18083 , archivePrefix =. 2508.18083 , primaryClass =
-
[21]
Is it due to a binary compact object merger?
EP250207b is not a collapsar fast X-ray transient. Is it due to a binary compact object merger?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2021 , archivePrefix =. 2508.13039 , primaryClass =
-
[22]
Soft X-ray prompt emission from the high-redshift gamma-ray burst EP240315a. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02449-8 , archivePrefix =. 2404.16425 , primaryClass =
-
[23]
EP240801a/XRF 240801B: An X-Ray Flash Detected by the Einstein Probe and the Implications of Its Multiband Afterglow. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/addebf , archivePrefix =. 2503.04306 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[24]
Probing a magnetar origin for the population of extragalactic fast X-ray transients detected by Chandra. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347629 , archivePrefix =. 2401.01415 , primaryClass =
-
[25]
Discovery of Three Candidate Magnetar-powered Fast X-Ray Transients from Chandra Archival Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc6 , archivePrefix =. 2201.06754 , primaryClass =
-
[26]
Failed jet breakout in the metal-poor broad-lined type Ic supernova 2026gzf. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.10002 , archivePrefix =. 2606.10002 , primaryClass =
-
[27]
GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.27223 , archivePrefix =. 2605.27223 , primaryClass =
-
[28]
Probing a new subclass of llGRB-SN transients: Insights from EP250304a and its associated supernova. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.06213 , archivePrefix =. 2606.06213 , primaryClass =
-
[29]
The Einstein Probe Transient EP240414a: Linking Fast X-Ray Transients, Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbc7e , archivePrefix =. 2409.19056 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[30]
Unveiling the nature of the Einstein Probe transient EP241021a. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2064 , archivePrefix =. 2511.13314 , primaryClass =
-
[31]
GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = may, volume =
EP240506a: EP-WXT detection of a new fast X-ray transient. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = may, volume =
2024
-
[32]
Heavy-element production in a compact object merger observed by JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1 , archivePrefix =. 2307.02098 , primaryClass =
-
[33]
EP250108a/SN 2025kg: A Jet-driven Stellar Explosion Interacting with Circumstellar Material. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade870 , archivePrefix =. 2504.17516 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[34]
The Day-long, Repeating GRB 250702B: A Unique Extragalactic Transient. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf8e1 , archivePrefix =. 2507.14286 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[35]
A fast powerful X-ray transient from possible tidal disruption of a white dwarf. Science Bulletin , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2025.12.050 , archivePrefix =. 2509.25877 , primaryClass =
arXiv 2025
-
[36]
arXiv e-prints , keywords =
Gravitational wave detectability range informed by external messengers. arXiv e-prints , keywords =
-
[37]
Investigating the off-axis GRB afterglow scenario for extragalactic fast X-ray transients. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450116 , archivePrefix =. 2407.06371 , primaryClass =
-
[38]
Nature Communications , keywords =
A peculiar low-luminosity short gamma-ray burst from a double neutron star merger progenitor. Nature Communications , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02847-3 , archivePrefix =. 1710.05851 , primaryClass =
-
[39]
All-sky search for short gravitational-wave bursts in the third Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo run. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.122004 , archivePrefix =. 2107.03701 , primaryClass =
-
[40]
All-sky search for short gravitational-wave bursts in the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/wjdz-jdby , archivePrefix =. 2507.12374 , primaryClass =
-
[41]
All-sky search for short gravitational-wave bursts in the first Advanced LIGO run. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.042003 , archivePrefix =. 1611.02972 , primaryClass =
-
[42]
All-sky search for short gravitational-wave bursts in the second Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo run. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024017 , archivePrefix =. 1904.08976 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904
-
[43]
Outlook for detection of GW inspirals by GRB-triggered searches in the advanced detector era. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.064033 , archivePrefix =. 1210.3095 , primaryClass =
-
[44]
Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =
A joint ranking statistic for multi-messenger astronomical searches with gravitational waves. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac5c00 , archivePrefix =. 2111.12814 , primaryClass =
-
[45]
Early X-ray emission of short gamma-ray bursts: Insights into physics and multi-messenger prospects. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557744 , archivePrefix =. 2510.16108 , primaryClass =
-
[46]
EP 250108a/SN 2025kg: Observations of the Most Nearby Broad-line Type Ic Supernova Following an Einstein Probe Fast X-Ray Transient. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade7f9 , archivePrefix =. 2504.08889 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[47]
The Kangaroo's First Hop: The Early Fast Cooling Phase of EP250108a/SN 2025kg. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade1d9 , archivePrefix =. 2504.08886 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[48]
EP 250108a/SN 2025kg: a magnetar-powered gamma-ray burst supernova originating from a close helium-star binary via isolated binary evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf114 , archivePrefix =. 2507.18544 , primaryClass =
-
[49]
The curious case of EP241021a: Unraveling the mystery of its exceptional rebrightening. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554626 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14588 , primaryClass =
-
[50]
Characterizing EP241107a: multiwavelength observations of an Einstein Probe-detected fast X-ray transient. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2062 , archivePrefix =. 2511.02562 , primaryClass =
-
[51]
EP241217a: A Likely Type II GRB with an Achromatic Bump at z = 4.59. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae29b5 , archivePrefix =. 2512.07233 , primaryClass =
-
[52]
GRB -0.5ex 250704B/EP250704a a Short Gamma-Ray Burst Powered by a Magnetar. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.15732 , archivePrefix =. 2601.15732 , primaryClass =
-
[53]
GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = may, volume =
Konus-Wind detection of GRB 260527A (short/hard) -0.5ex 4 min before EP260527a. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = may, volume =
2026
-
[54]
Optical observations of candidate host galaxies of eight fast X-ray transients
Optical observations of candidate host galaxies of eight fast X-ray transients. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.27048 , archivePrefix =. 2606.27048 , primaryClass =
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.27048
-
[55]
The properties of tidal disruption event infrared counterparts produced by dust rings and inference of the observing angle. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.17230 , archivePrefix =. 2606.17230 , primaryClass =
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.17230
-
[56]
Ultra-long MeV transient from a relativistic jet: A tidal disruption event candidate. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556591 , archivePrefix =. 2507.18694 , primaryClass =
-
[57]
Astrophysics and Space Science Library , year = 2022, editor =
Millisecond Magnetars. Astrophysics and Space Science Library , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9_8 , archivePrefix =. 2103.10878 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
-
[58]
An extremely soft and weak fast X-ray transient associated with a luminous supernova. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.17034 , archivePrefix =. 2504.17034 , primaryClass =
-
[59]
Inspiral, merger, and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.124018 , url =
-
[60]
Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044003 , url =
-
[61]
A Joint Fermi-GBM and Swift-BAT Analysis of Gravitational-wave Candidates from the Third Gravitational-wave Observing Run. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1eed , archivePrefix =. 2308.13666 , primaryClass =
-
[62]
Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =
Search for advanced LIGO single interferometer compact binary coalescence signals in coincidence with Gamma-ray events in Fermi-GBM. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aba28a , archivePrefix =. 2001.01462 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[63]
Performance of the low-latency GstLAL inspiral search towards LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA's fourth observing run. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.042008 , archivePrefix =. 2305.05625 , primaryClass =
-
[64]
Real-time Search for Compact Binary Mergers in Advanced LIGO and Virgo's Third Observing Run Using PyCBC Live. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f9a , archivePrefix =. 2008.07494 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
-
[65]
Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =
The MBTA pipeline for detecting compact binary coalescences in the third LIGO-Virgo observing run. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abe913 , archivePrefix =. 2012.11512 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[66]
coherent WaveBurst, a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis. SoftwareX , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100678 , archivePrefix =. 2006.12604 , primaryClass =
arXiv 2021
-
[67]
APS April Meeting Abstracts , year = 2022, series =
Searching for Sub-threshold Gravitational Wave Candidates with RAVEN. APS April Meeting Abstracts , year = 2022, series =
2022
-
[68]
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =
Low-latency gravitational wave alert products and their performance at the time of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2316474121 , archivePrefix =. 2308.04545 , primaryClass =
-
[69]
X-Ray Counterpart of Gravitational Waves Due to Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Light Curves, Luminosity Function, and Event Rate Density. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/7 , archivePrefix =. 1610.03860 , primaryClass =
-
[70]
X-Ray Emission Signatures of Neutron Star Mergers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5535 , archivePrefix =. 2505.01606 , primaryClass =
-
[71]
National Science Review , keywords =
Magnetar emergence in a peculiar gamma-ray burst from a compact star merger. National Science Review , keywords =. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwae401 , archivePrefix =. 2307.05689 , primaryClass =
-
[73]
-Ray Bursts and Afterglows from Rotating Strange Stars and Neutron Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4301 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9810332 , primaryClass =
-
[74]
A Unified Binary Neutron Star Merger Magnetar Model for the Chandra X-Ray Transients CDF-S XT1 and XT2. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4bc7 , archivePrefix =. 1908.01107 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908
-
[75]
Short-living Supermassive Magnetar Model for the Early X-ray Flares Following Short GRBs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1009-9271/6/5/01 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0512646 , primaryClass =
-
[76]
Signatures of magnetar central engines in short GRB light curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts683 , archivePrefix =. 1301.0629 , primaryClass =
-
[77]
The Millisecond Magnetar Central Engine in Short GRBs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/89 , archivePrefix =. 1501.02589 , primaryClass =
-
[78]
GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.27225 , archivePrefix =. 2605.27225 , primaryClass =
-
[79]
Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.011102 , archivePrefix =. 1110.0467 , primaryClass =
-
[80]
Emission of Magnetar Bursts and Precursors of Neutron Star Mergers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac17e7 , archivePrefix =. 2011.07310 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[81]
Pulsar revival in neutron star mergers: multimessenger prospects for the discovery of pre-merger coherent radio emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3580 , archivePrefix =. 2210.17205 , primaryClass =
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.