Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 292 references

Partially switched wurtzite ferroelectric capacitors can hold data for projected millions of years at 150 °C by cutting the initial imprint that normally limits retention.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 20:16 UTC pith:AD4TPBK4

load-bearing objection Real measured effect, over-sold extrapolation: partial switching improves retention out to 10^4 s, but the 3-million-year claim needs far more support. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16665 v1 pith:AD4TPBK4 submitted 2026-07-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Three Million Years Opposite State Data Retention in Partially Switched Wurtzite Ferroelectrics

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectric memorywurtzite ferroelectricsAlScNpartial switchingopposite state retentionimprintendurancedata retention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the way a ferroelectric memory is written — switching only part of the polarization instead of all of it — can be the dominant lever for data retention. In wurtzite ferroelectrics (AlScN and AlScBN films 60–270 nm thick), the abrupt imprint that follows a full switching event can account for more than half of the total imprint. Partial switching drastically lowers that initial imprint, and the authors show that the partially switched state then retains a larger switchable polarization than a fully switched device after the same bake time. Combining measured imprint growth with standard switching kinetics, they project opposite-state retention reaching roughly 3 million years at 150 °C for a 200 µs read, a 5–7 order of magnitude improvement, while also improving endurance against polarization loss and breakdown.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that partially switched wurtzite ferroelectric capacitors retain data far longer than fully switched ones. The central measured fact is that the imprint-induced coercive field shift starts from a lower intercept for partial states, while growing with the same logarithmic slope during baking at 150 °C. Because switching kinetics depend exponentially on the field ratio E/Ec, the smaller imprint leaves the partially switched state with a larger effective switching field and a shorter characteristic switching time; as a result its read-out polarization after bake exceeds that of the fully switched device even though its initial polarization was written sma

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by coupling two models: (1) Kolmogorov–Avrami–Ishibashi (KAI) switching kinetics, which relate the switching polarization after a read pulse to the field ratio E/Ec and a characteristic time t0, and (2) the near-electrode charge-injection imprint model, in which the imprint shift ΔEc grows logarithmically with bake time. Partial switching enters by lowering the intercept of ΔEc(tbake) — reducing the initial imprint — while preserving the same growth slope, which shifts the whole retention curve. The model's projection step substitutes the time-dependent t0 into the KAI expression to compute read polarization beyond the measured 10^4 s bake.

Load-bearing premise

The million-year projection assumes that the logarithmic imprint growth measured out to 10^4 s continues with the same slope out to about 10^14 s, and that the partially switched domain pattern does not depolarize on its own over that span; neither is directly measured.

What would settle it

Extend bake experiments beyond 10^4 s (or use accelerated temperature) and measure ΔEc for partially switched states: if the logarithmic slope bends, or if the partial state's remanent polarization decays without an applied field, the projected 3-million-year retention collapses even if the short-time trend is right. A second check: at a read time longer than 200 µs, the crossing point where partial Psw exceeds full Psw should shift in a specific way predicted by the model.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If true, ferroelectric memory written in partial polarization states can match or exceed multi-million-year retention targets of archival memory while still using conventional electrical read and write.
  • A partially switched device can deliver more read charge after bake than a fully switched one, despite being written with less than half the polarization, because its imprint stays smaller.
  • Endurance improves by roughly two orders of magnitude when write amplitudes are adjusted to keep the partial state constant, because electrical stress is reduced.
  • The same partial-switching lever should apply to any ferroelectric whose retention is limited by imprint from charge injection; wurtzite compounds with very large spontaneous polarization are especially suited because small switched volumes still exceed recognition thresholds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The projection to 3 million years rests on a roughly ten-order extrapolation of the logarithmic imprint slope; a straightforward test is to bake devices beyond 10^4 s or at higher temperatures and check whether ΔEc keeps its slope — the paper itself does not report such data beyond 10^4 s.
  • If partial states are stable against same-state depolarization, this strategy could combine with multi-level cell operation, since partial switching already defines distinguishable polarization levels; the retention advantage would then extend to analog or multi-bit storage.
  • The improvement factor may be material-dependent: the paper reports 4–5 orders for AlScN versus 6–7 for AlScBN, suggesting that the Avrami exponent and nucleation geometry set how much of the retention gain is realized; tuning composition may trade write margin for retention.
  • A caution implied but not developed: the model assumes the partially switched domain pattern itself does not relax over time; if the same-state retention of partial states is weaker than assumed, the million-year number may describe imprint-driven read failure but not spontaneous depolarization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports on opposite-state (OS) retention in wurtzite ferroelectric capacitors (AlScBN 270 nm, AlScN 60 nm) and argues that storing data in a partially switched polarization state substantially improves retention compared to full switching. The evidence is a combination of (i) measured imprint shifts ΔEc(tbake) at 150 °C up to 10^4 s, (ii) switching-kinetics fits from which the characteristic switching time t0 and field acceleration parameters are extracted, and (iii) a projection that connects ΔEc(tbake) to the read polarization Psw. The authors report that partial switching reduces the initial imprint, that the projected Psw of partially switched states exceeds that of fully switched states within the measured interval, and they extrapolate the model to predict OS retention of about 3 million years at 150 °C for 200 µs read time. They further report improved endurance under partial-switching operation.

Significance. If the central projection is valid, the paper is significant: it identifies a simple operational strategy — partial switching — that would improve OS retention by several orders of magnitude and simultaneously improve endurance, which is directly relevant to ferroelectric memory applications. The direct measurements up to 10^4 s do support the qualitative trend that partial states yield larger Psw after bake than fully switched states, and the observation is made in two material systems of different thickness. The paper also builds on a standard physically motivated model (charge-injection imprint plus KAI switching kinetics), which is a strength. However, the headline quantitative claim depends on a ten-decade extrapolation of a logarithmic trend measured over four decades, and the manuscript does not provide the full model equations, parameter values, or a sensitivity analysis. The significance is therefore conditional: the qualitative message is credible, but the quantitative 3-million-year figure is not yet supported by the evidence as presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Fig. 1d and Fig. 2b,c] The 3-million-year projection is obtained by extending the measured ΔEc(tbake) trend, which is logarithmic over 1–10^4 s, to ~10^14 s. This is the load-bearing step of the paper. No data or literature benchmark supports the assumption that the same logarithmic slope continues unchanged for ten additional decades; a modest steepening or saturation of the charge-injection process would shift the crossing of the read threshold Pth by orders of magnitude. Please provide a sensitivity analysis with respect to the imprint slope and intercept, and ideally longer-time data or a physical argument for the applicability of the Tagantsev injection model over this range. Without this, the headline retention time is a point estimate from an unvalidated functional form.
  2. [Section II, projection model] The model connecting ΔEc(tbake) to Psw(t, tbake) is described only in words. No explicit equations are given for the KAI switching current, the t0(E/Ec) relation, the α and β parameters, or the way ΔEc enters the effective E/Ec and t0. The reported values of n, t0, α, β, and the imprint intercepts and slopes are not tabulated. As a result, the 3-million-year number cannot be reproduced or checked by the reader. Please include the full model equations, the fitted parameter values with uncertainties, and the numerical integration procedure used to produce Fig. 2b,c.
  3. [Section II.A, endurance] The endurance claim is based on a single sample set and no explicit comparison to the full-switching baseline is shown in Fig. 2a. The text states that breakdown occurred after ~2.8×10^5 cycles and that this is a two-order-of-magnitude improvement, but the full-switching breakdown value and the criteria for defining breakdown are not given. In addition, the assumption that the partial state domain distribution remains invariant during cycling is asserted without verification. Please provide the full-switching endurance data, specify the breakdown criterion, and report measurement statistics.
  4. [Section II / Fig. 1] The paper does not report same-state (SS) retention data for partially switched states. The projection assumes the partial domain pattern is stable against depolarization; if partial states slowly relax toward the unswitched condition, the read polarization Psw could decrease independently of the ΔEc trend and offset the claimed improvement. At minimum, this assumption should be stated explicitly and supported by SS retention measurements or a clear argument based on the measured Psw stability over the 10^4 s interval.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Index Terms] The index term 'wurztize' appears to be a typo for 'wurtzite'. Also, the unit in the abstract and main text appears garbled as 'µC/cmš' or 'tC/cmš'; this should be corrected to µC/cm².
  2. [Fig. 2 caption / body text] The material name is written inconsistently as 'AlBScN' in Fig. 2 and 'AlScBN' elsewhere. Please standardize. The mark '2 · 26.5 µC/cm²' in the caption is unclear; it likely refers to a read-charge threshold and should be explained.
  3. [References] Reference to 'Guido et al.' is made without a complete citation in the reference list. Please add the full reference.
  4. [Section II, 'Paradoxically, yet systematically'] The wording is informal for a journal report. Consider rephrasing to a more neutral statement, e.g., 'Counterintuitively but consistently across samples...'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the retention projection is a model-based extrapolation from independently measured switching and imprint data.

full rationale

The paper's central projection is not circular by construction. OS retention is computed by combining (i) measured logarithmic imprint shifts ΔEc(tbake) for fully and partially switched states, (ii) switching-kinetics fits t0(E/Ec) with KAI exponents extracted from current transients, and (iii) a read-time integration. The projected Psw(tbake) curves are then checked against directly measured retention data up to 10^4 s, so the projection has an in-paper independent validation within the measured window. The claimed 5–7 orders of magnitude improvement and the 3-million-year crossing time arise because the model propagates measured lower ΔEc intercepts and reduced t0 for partial states through an exponential switching-time relation; this is an amplification of measured differences, not a definition of the target in terms of itself. The charge-injection imprint model of Tagantsev and the KAI switching formalism are external physical models, not author-imposed ansatze. The citation to 'Guido et al.' for the projection recipe is self-referential, but the method is standard and is validated against retention measurements reported in this paper, so the self-citation is not the sole load-bearing support. The main weaknesses are the unvalidated continuation of the logarithmic imprint slope to ~10^14 s and the assumed stability of the partial domain pattern; these are extrapolation and data-coverage concerns (correctness risk), not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited with a quote, and the score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central 3-million-year projection rests on several fitted parameters and extrapolation assumptions. No new physical entities are postulated. The main risk is the unvalidated extension of short-time fits by about 9 orders of magnitude, plus the unaddressed stability of the partially switched state.

free parameters (6)
  • Avrami exponent n = n=2 (AlScN), n=4 (AlScBN)
    Fitted to switching kinetics data; different n changes the projected retention slope and onset.
  • Field acceleration parameters α and β = not reported
    Extracted from ln(t0) vs E/Ec fits; used to project switching current beyond measured bake times.
  • Characteristic switching time t0 = not reported
    Fit from switching kinetics; partially switched films show lower t0, a key input to the retention improvement.
  • Imprint slope and intercept (ΔEc vs log tbake) = not reported
    Fitted to 10^4 s bake data; intercept is lower for partial states, slope is similar; extrapolation assumes the slope persists.
  • Endurance compensation coefficient = -1.4
    ΔEc(n) = -1.4 log(n) fitted to N-to-M endurance cycling; used to adjust voltage for partial-switching endurance.
  • Partial polarization write fraction = ~40% Pr
    Hand-chosen operating point; retention and endurance results depend on this fraction, and no optimization over fraction is reported.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption KAI model describes switching kinetics of wurtzite ferroelectrics
    The paper fits KAI (Kolmogorov-Avrami-Ishibashi) exponents to switching kinetics and uses the model to project retention (Section II).
  • domain assumption Charge injection/imprint model (Tagantsev) gives logarithmic ΔEc(t) growth
    The paper assumes the imprint shift grows logarithmically with bake time, following "the charge injection model by Tagantsevs et al." (Section II).
  • domain assumption Switching kinetics parameters (t0, α, β, n) measured at room temperature remain valid at 150°C bake except through ΔEc(t)
    The projection links switching kinetics to bake time only through the imprint-driven change in E/Ec, ignoring potential changes in domain-wall mobility or trap dynamics at 150°C.
  • domain assumption Logarithmic imprint growth measured up to 10^4 s continues unchanged to ~10^14 s
    The 3-million-year projection requires the same slope for 9 additional decades in time, with no validation or physical saturation mechanism supplied.
  • domain assumption Partially switched domain configuration is stable against same-state depolarization over the projected timescale
    The partial state is a non-equilibrium domain pattern; its stability over years is not measured or discussed, yet the retention projection requires it.
  • domain assumption Guido et al.'s relation connecting switching kinetics with tbake is valid
    The central projection equation is only referenced to 'Guido et al.', not stated or derived; since that reference is missing from the list, this is an unverified input.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 4400 in / 13871 out tokens · 121463 ms · 2026-08-01T20:16:51.448234+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric memories based on the wurtzite-structured ferroelectrics are projected to store information for more than 3 million years at 150C. These results are extracted by combining standard domain wall motion limited switching kinetics with the near-by-electrode injection model for opposite state retention in ferroelectric random access memory. This impressive performance is greatly aided by switching only a fraction of the total polarization to store data, in order to limit the initial imprint variation of the devices - an effect that is universally observed in films with different thicknesses (60 nm - 270 nm) and different compounds (AlScN and AlScBN). Paradoxically, yet systematically, this reduction in initial imprint consistently results in larger switching polarization after a given time, compared to the fully switching state and 5-7 orders of magnitude improved opposite state retention. Finally, partial switching is able to simultaneously boost endurance against premature polarization loss and breakdown, making it a promising strategy for improved operation of ferroelectric devices with large spontaneous polarization, in particularly wurtzite-structured compounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16665 by Maike Gremmel, Roberto Guido, Simon Fichtner, Uwe Schr\"oder, Victor Witte.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

292 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    IEEE tran Homepage

    Michael Shell. IEEE tran Homepage. 2007

  2. [2]

    IEEE tran Webpage on CTAN

    Michael Shell. IEEE tran Webpage on CTAN. 2007

  3. [3]

    The IEEE Website. 2007

  4. [4]

    Oren Patashnik. ing. 1988

  5. [5]

    Designing Styles

    Oren Patashnik. Designing Styles. 1988

  6. [6]

    Tame the BeaST --- The B to X of

    Nicolas Markey. Tame the BeaST --- The B to X of. 2005

  7. [7]

    Tips and FAQ

    David Hoadley and Michael Shell. Tips and FAQ. 2007

  8. [8]

    Robin Fairbairns. The FAQ. 2007

  9. [9]

    A Guide via Examples

    Ki-Joo Kim. A Guide via Examples. 2004

  10. [10]

    Nelson H. F. Beebe. User Group Bibliography Archive. 2006

  11. [11]

    Patrick W. Daly. The natbib.sty package. 2006

  12. [12]

    The url.sty Package

    Donald Arseneau. The url.sty Package. 2005

  13. [13]

    The hyperref.sty Package

    Sebastian Rahtz and Heiko Oberdiek. The hyperref.sty Package. 2006

  14. [14]

    The breakurl.sty Package

    Vilar Camara Neto. The breakurl.sty Package. 2006

  15. [15]

    The Babel Package

    Johannes Braams. The Babel Package. 2005

  16. [16]

    The multibib.sty package

    Thorsten Hansen. The multibib.sty package. 2004

  17. [17]

    The biblatex package

    Philipp Lehman. The biblatex package. 2007

  18. [18]

    Zhang and C

    S. Zhang and C. Zhu and J. K. O. Sin and P. K. T. Mok. A Novel Ultrathin Elevated Channel Low-temperature Poly- Si TFT. 1999

  19. [19]

    Delorme and others

    F. Delorme and others. Butt-jointed DBR Laser With 15 nm Tunability Grown in Three MOVPE Steps. Electron. Lett. 1995

  20. [20]

    R. K. Gupta and S. D. Senturia. Pull-in Time Dynamics as a Measure of Absolute Pressure. Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Microelectromechanical Systems ( MEMS '97). 1997

  21. [21]

    B. D. Cullity. Introduction to Magnetic Materials. 1972

  22. [22]

    Castaldini and A

    A. Castaldini and A. Cavallini and B. Fraboni and P. Fernandez and J. Piqueras. Midgap Traps Related to Compensation Processes in CdTe Alloys. Phys. Rev. B. 1997

  23. [23]

    Okada and K

    Y. Okada and K. Dejima and T. Ohishi. Analysis and Comparison of PM Synchronous Motor and Induction Motor Type Magnetic Bearings. 1995

  24. [24]

    Coates and A

    M. Coates and A. Hero and R. Nowak and B. Yu. Internet Tomography. 2002

  25. [25]

    Kahale and R

    N. Kahale and R. Urbanke. On the Minimum Distance of Parallel and Serially Concatenated Codes. submitted for publication

  26. [26]

    Oversampling Delta-Sigma Data Converters Theory, Design and Simulation. 1992

  27. [27]

    S. M. Metev and V. P. Veiko. Laser Assisted Microtechnology. 1998

  28. [28]

    The Analysis of Directional Time Series: Applications to Wind Speed and Direction. 1989

  29. [29]

    H. E. Rose. A Course in Number Theory. 1988

  30. [30]

    B. K. Bul. Theory Principles and Design of Magnetic Circuits. 1964

  31. [31]

    W. V. Sorin. Optical Reflectometry for Component Characterization. Fiber Optic Test and Measurement. 1998

  32. [32]

    J. B. Anderson and K. Tepe. Properties of the Tailbiting BCJR Decoder. Codes, Systems and Graphical Models. 2000

  33. [33]

    Hedelin and P

    P. Hedelin and P. Knagenhjelm and M. Skoglund. Theory for Transmission of Vector Quantization Data. Speech Coding and Synthesis. 1995

  34. [34]

    R. M. A. Dawson and Z. Shen and D. A. Furst and S. Connor and J. Hsu and M. G. Kane and R. G. Stewart and A. Ipri and C. N. King and P. J. Green and R. T. Flegal and S. Pearson and W. A. Barrow and E. Dickey and K. Ping and C. W. Tang and S. Van. Slyke and F. Chen and J. Shi and J. C. Sturm and M. H. Lu. Design of an Improved Pixel for a Polysilicon Activ...

  35. [35]

    FLEXChip Signal Processor ( MC68175/D ). 1996

  36. [36]

    FLEXChip Signal Processor. 1996

  37. [37]

    M. S. Yee and L. Hanzo. Radial Basis Function Decision Feedback Equaliser Assisted Burst-by-burst Adaptive Modulation. Proc. IEEE Globecom '99. 1999

  38. [38]

    Yajnik and S

    M. Yajnik and S. B. Moon and J. Kurose and D. Towsley. Measurement and Modeling of the Temporal Dependence in Packet Loss. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '99. 1999

  39. [39]

    Wegmuller and J

    M. Wegmuller and J. P. von der Weid and P. Oberson and N. Gisin. High Resolution Fiber Distributed Measurements With Coherent OFDR. Proc. ECOC '00. 2000

  40. [40]

    Mikkelsen and G

    B. Mikkelsen and G. Raybon and R.-J. Essiambre and K. Dreyer and Y. Su. and L. E. Nelson and J. E. Johnson and G. Shtengel and A. Bond and D. G. Moodie and A. D. Ellis. 160 Gbit/s Single-channel Transmission Over 300 km Nonzero-dispersion Fiber With Semiconductor Based Transmitter and Demultiplexer. Proc. ECOC '99. 1999

  41. [41]

    S. G. Finn and M. M \'e dard and R. A. Barry. A Novel Approach to Automatic Protection Switching Using Trees. Proc. Int. Conf. Commun. 1997

  42. [42]

    Nin C. Loh. High-Resolution Micromachined Interferometric Accelerometer. 1992

  43. [43]

    A. Karnik. Performance of TCP Congestion Control with Rate Feedback: TCP/ABR and Rate Adaptive TCP/IP. 1999

  44. [44]

    Q. Li. Delay Characterization and Performance Control of Wide-area Networks. 2000

  45. [45]

    Jain and K

    R. Jain and K. K. Ramakrishnan and D. M. Chiu. Congestion Avoidance in Computer Networks with a Connectionless Network Layer. 1987

  46. [46]

    Padhye and V

    J. Padhye and V. Firoiu and D. Towsley. A Stochastic Model of TCP R eno Congestion Avoidance and Control. 1999

  47. [47]

    Middleton and A

    D. Middleton and A. D. Spaulding. A Tutorial Review of Elements of Weak Signal Detection in Non- G aussian EMI Environments. 1986

  48. [48]

    T. J. Ott and N. Aggarwal. TCP over ATM : ABR or UBR

  49. [49]

    Jacobson

    V. Jacobson. Modified TCP Congestion Avoidance Algorithm. 1990

  50. [50]

    Valloppillil and K

    V. Valloppillil and K. W. Ross. Cache Array Routing Protocol v1.1. 1998

  51. [51]

    D. H. Lorenz and A. Orda. Optimal Partition of QoS Requirements on Unicast Paths and Multicast Trees. 1998

  52. [52]

    Sorace and Victor S

    Ronald E. Sorace and Victor S. Reinhardt and Steven A. Vaughn. High-Speed Digital-to- RF Converter. 1997

  53. [53]

    U. Hideki. Quadrature Modulation Circuit. 1992

  54. [54]

    Kowalik and M

    F. Kowalik and M. Isard. Estimateur d'un D \'e faut de Fonctionnement d'un Modulateur en Quadrature et \'E tage de Modulation l'Utilisant

  55. [55]

    Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification. 1997

  56. [56]

    Fiber Channel Physical Interface ( FC-PI ). 1999

  57. [57]

    Widjaja and A

    I. Widjaja and A. Elwalid. MATE : MPLS Adaptive Traffic Engineering. 1999

  58. [58]

    L. Roberts. Enhanced Proportional Rate Control Algorithm PRCA. 1994

  59. [59]

    Advanced QoS Services for the Intelligent Internet. 1997

  60. [60]

    PDCA12-70 Data Sheet

  61. [61]

    K. K. Ramakrishnan and S. Floyd. A Proposal to Add Explicit Congestion Notification ( ECN ) to IP. 1999

  62. [62]

    SaberDesigner Reference Manual. 1998

  63. [63]

    Ucb/lbnl/vint Network Simulator---ns (Version 2)

  64. [64]

    M essung von S t \"o rfeldern an A nlagen und L eitungen der T elekommunikation im F requenzbereich 9 kHz bis 3 GHz

  65. [65]

    Telemetry Channel Coding

    Consulative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). Telemetry Channel Coding. Blue Book. 1999

  66. [66]

    Telemetry Channel Coding

    Consulative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). Telemetry Channel Coding. 1999

  67. [67]

    Telemetry Channel Coding. 1999

  68. [68]

    2022 , journal =

    Christensen, Dennis Valbjørn and Dittmann, Regina and Linares-Barranco, Bernabe and Sebastian, Abu and Le Gallo, Manuel and Redaelli, Andrea and Slesazeck, Stefan and Mikolajick, Thomas and Spiga, Sabina and Menzel, Stephan and Valov, Ilia and Milano, Gianluca and Ricciardi, Carlo and Liang, Shi-Jun and Miao, Feng and Lanza, Mario and Quill, Tyler J and K...

  69. [69]

    2021 , journal =

    Tong, Lei and Peng, Zhuiri and Lin, Runfeng and Li, Zheng and Wang, Yilun and Huang, Xinyu and Xue, Kan Hao and Xu, Hangyu and Liu, Feng and Xia, Hui and Wang, Peng and Xu, Mingsheng and Xiong, Wei and Hu, Weida and Xu, Jianbin and Zhang, Xinliang and Ye, Lei and Miao, Xiangshui , number =. 2021 , journal =. doi:10.1126/science.abg3161 , issn =

  70. [71]

    and Acklin, Randy and Blake, Terry and Du, Xiao Hong and Eliason, Jarrod and Fong, John and Kraus, William F

    McAdams, Hugh P. and Acklin, Randy and Blake, Terry and Du, Xiao Hong and Eliason, Jarrod and Fong, John and Kraus, William F. and Liu, David and Madan, Sudhir and Moise, Ted and Natarajan, Sreedhar and Qian, Ning and Qiu, Yunchen and Remack, Keith A. and Rodriguez, John and Roscher, John and Seshadri, Anand and Summerfelt, Scott R. , number =. 2004 , jou...

  71. [72]

    2020 , journal =

    Xue, Cheng Xin and Chiu, Yen Cheng and Liu, Ta Wei and Huang, Tsung Yuan and Liu, Je Syu and Chang, Ting Wei and Kao, Hui Yao and Wang, Jing Hong and Wei, Shih Ying and Lee, Chun Ying and Huang, Sheng Po and Hung, Je Min and Teng, Shih Hsih and Wei, Wei Chen and Chen, Yi Ren and Hsu, Tzu Hsiang and Chen, Yen Kai and Lo, Yun Chen and Wen, Tai Hsing and Lo,...

  72. [73]

    2020 , journal =

    Zhu, Jiadi and Zhang, Teng and Yang, Yuchao and Huang, Ru , number =. 2020 , journal =

  73. [74]

    2022 , journal =

    Jung, Seungchul and Lee, Hyungwoo and Myung, Sungmeen and Kim, Hyunsoo and Yoon, Seung Keun and Kwon, Soon Wan and Ju, Yongmin and Kim, Minje and Yi, Wooseok and Han, Shinhee and Kwon, Baeseong and Seo, Boyoung and Lee, Kilho and Koh, Gwan Hyeob and Lee, Kangho and Song, Yoonjong and Choi, Changkyu and Ham, Donhee and Kim, Sang Joon , number =. 2022 , jou...

  74. [75]

    2018 , journal =

    D. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268425 , issn =

  75. [76]

    2021 , journal =

    Ali, Tarek and Mertens, Konstantin and K. 2021 , journal =

  76. [77]

    and Gao, Shengjie and Qiu, Gang and Qin, Jingkai and Duan, Yuqin and Jian, Jie and Niu, Chang and Wang, Haiyan and Wu, Wenzhuo and Gupta, Sumeet K

    Si, Mengwei and Saha, Atanu K. and Gao, Shengjie and Qiu, Gang and Qin, Jingkai and Duan, Yuqin and Jian, Jie and Niu, Chang and Wang, Haiyan and Wu, Wenzhuo and Gupta, Sumeet K. and Ye, Peide D. , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0338-7 , issn =

  77. [78]

    2025 , journal =

    Moise, Ted and Summerfelt, Scott and Rodriguez, John , number =. 2025 , journal =. doi:10.3390/ELECTRONICS14040818 , issn =

  78. [79]

    2020 , journal =

    Luo, Qing and Cheng, Yan and Yang, Jianguo and Cao, Rongrong and Ma, Haili and Yang, Yang and Huang, Rong and Wei, Wei and Zheng, Yonghui and Gong, Tiancheng and Yu, Jie and Xu, Xiaoxin and Yuan, Peng and Li, Xiaoyan and Tai, Lu and Yu, Haoran and Shang, Dashan and Liu, Qi and Yu, Bing and Ren, Qiwei and Lv, Hangbing and Liu, Ming , number =. 2020 , journ...

  79. [80]

    , month =

    Vetury, Ramakrishna and Kochhar, Abhay and Leathersich, Jeff and Moe, Craig and Winters, Mary and Shealy, Jeffrey and Olsson, Roy H. , month =. 2023 , booktitle =. doi:10.1109/IMS37964.2023.10188141 , keywords =

  80. [81]

    and Hwang, Cheol Seong and Tang, Ting Ao and Lu, Hui Bin and Yang, Guo Zhen , number =

    Jiang, An Quan and Wang, Can and Jin, Kui Juan and Liu, Xiao Bing and Scott, James F. and Hwang, Cheol Seong and Tang, Ting Ao and Lu, Hui Bin and Yang, Guo Zhen , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1002/adma.201004317 , issn =

Showing first 80 references.