Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 37 references

Vacancy-Induced Topological Phase Transition via Valley Annihilation in an Anisotropic Honeycomb Lattice

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a single missing atom in an anisotropic honeycomb lattice carries a winding number ν3 = ∓1 for t'/t < 2, and that this winding collapses to zero exactly at t'/t = 2, where the two Dirac valleys merge — a topological pha

desk verdict A parameter-free m-counting argument for a vacancy-driven topological transition at t'/t=2, but the below-transition winding rests on an asserted coordinate transformation rather than a microscopic derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16965 v1 pith:YG3GMRHF submitted 2026-07-18 cond-mat.mes-hall

Anna Hassine , Amit Goft , Boris Rotstein , Eric Akkermans This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topologicalphasetransitionvacancydefecthoneycomblatticevalleymergingwindingnumberWeylsymbolNielsen-NinomiyatheoremBDIsymmetryclass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper attempts to establish that a single point defect can host a topological invariant even when the surrounding lattice is topologically trivial for every parameter value, and that this defect invariant changes abruptly when the bulk undergoes a Lifshitz transition. Concretely, in a honeycomb lattice with anisotropic nearest-neighbor hopping t'/t, one missing atom produces a protected zero mode whose winding number is ∓1 below t'/t=2 and 0 above. The transition is driven by the annihilation of the two Dirac valleys, which reduces the active pseudospinor degrees of freedom from 2 to 1 and invalidates the dimensional condition d+D+1=2m. A sympathetic reader would care because it separates the existence of a zero mode from its topological classification, and because the collapse is observable in the local density of states as a disappearing wavefront dislocation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Wigner-Weyl phase-space symbol H(k,r) of the defect Hamiltonian; its chiral off-diagonal block q is a U(m) matrix whose winding over the three-dimensional phase-space sphere enclosing the vacancy defines ν3. The proof factorizes ν3 = sgn(vx vy) × w[ϕ], separating the Dirac-cone chirality from the winding w[ϕ] of the vacancy perturbation phase ϕ(r̃). The condition d+D+1=2m — here 4=2×2 — is what makes the U(2) winding nontrivial; when valley merging sets m=1, the target space collapses to U(1) and the winding is forced to zero.

What would settle it

Compute the defect phase directly from the anisotropic tight-binding model without the rescaling assumption and check its winding for t'/t<2; any deviation from unit winding makes ν3≠∓1. Or, in a strained honeycomb lattice with t'/t>2, look for a wavefront dislocation in the LDOS — one surviving dislocation would disprove ν3=0.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a single type-A vacancy in the chiral anisotropic honeycomb lattice, the defect winding number ν3 — defined as the phase-space winding of the off-diagonal chiral block of the Weyl symbol — equals ∓1 for t'/t<2. At t'/t=2 the two Dirac valleys merge into one semi-Dirac point, the effective number of valley pseudospinor degrees of freedom drops from m=2 to m=1, and the homotopy group π3(U(1)) is trivial, so ν3 necessarily vanishes. The paper argues this is a topological phase transition within a single symmetry class (BDI), driven not by a bulk gap closing but by a reduction in the dimension of the topological phase space accessible to the defect. The zero mode itself persists across the t

Load-bearing premise

The argument's load-bearing premise is that removing an atom from the anisotropic lattice produces the same swirling pattern of the defect field as in the isotropic lattice (just stretched), so the winding stays at one turn for every hopping ratio below the critical one; this equivalence is assumed, not derived.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The winding number of a single vacancy is a sharp function of hopping anisotropy, switching from ∓1 to 0 exactly at t'/t=2, even though the pristine lattice remains topologically trivial for all t'/t.
  • A topological phase transition can occur inside a fixed symmetry class without any bulk gap closing; the bulk Lifshitz transition acquires topological meaning only through the defect.
  • The zero-energy mode is not the order parameter: it exists for every t'/t by index counting, while its winding number collapses, so experiments must track the LDOS phase dislocations rather than the mid-gap state.
  • The inverse participation ratio of the zero mode has a sharp minimum at criticality and is robust against weak bond disorder, giving a numerical fingerprint of the transition.
  • The m-counting criterion predicts the same defect-winding collapse in any bipartite chiral lattice where the number of Dirac valleys can be continuously reduced, including strained graphene, Kekulé-distorted lattices, and photonic or cold-atom honeycomb analogs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the m-counting mechanism is as universal as stated, the same collapse should appear in three-dimensional analogs: a line defect in a Weyl semimetal whose Weyl points annihilate at a critical parameter would show ν3 jump from the appropriate nontrivial value to zero, with the dimensional condition d+D+1=2m shifting accordingly.
  • The factorization ν3 = sgn(vxvy) × w[ϕ] suggests that the transition could be delayed or altered by engineering the vacancy potential itself to have fractional or multi-wound phase profiles, though the paper does not explore such engineered defects.
  • Because the transition point coincides with a Lifshitz point, the paper's setup offers a concrete way to locate a topological critical point in a finite system: scan the hopping ratio and look for the IPR dip, a protocol that could transfer directly to strained graphene samples where strain controls the effective t'/t.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies a single vacancy in a two-dimensional anisotropic honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor hopping ratio t'/t. The pristine lattice is gapless with two Dirac valleys for t'/t<2, which merge at t'/t=2 and open a gap above. Using a Wigner-Weyl phase-space description of the defect, the authors claim that the vacancy carries a defect winding number ν3=∓1 for t'/t<2, protected by the m=2 valley degrees of freedom via the condition d+D+1=2m, and that ν3 collapses to 0 for t'/t≥2 because the valleys merge and m reduces to 1, since π3(U(1))=0. They interpret this as a topological phase transition within a fixed symmetry class BDI, invisible in the bulk and observable only through the vacancy. They support the transition with numerical zero-mode profiles, an inverse participation ratio minimum at t'/t=2, robustness to disorder, and wavefront dislocations in the LDOS.

Significance. If established, the result is significant: it provides an analytically simple and parameter-free mechanism by which a bulk Lifshitz transition acquires topological meaning through a point defect, and it proposes a concrete spatially resolved observable (wavefront dislocations) and a sharp IPR fingerprint. The central m-counting argument is elegant and the transition point is fixed by the independent Montambaux band-structure criterion. The main weakness is that the below-transition winding for the anisotropic vacancy is imported from the isotropic case via a coordinate transformation rather than derived microscopically; the numerical evidence does not directly measure ν3. With a derivation or direct invariant computation, the paper would be a valuable contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (5) and Eq. (6)] The below-transition Weyl symbol H_below(k,r̃) is asserted as 'is [5,6]' and the carry-over from the isotropic vacancy is justified only by the statement 'Under the coordinate transformation (r,θ)→(r̃,θ̃), the same profile applies to the anisotropic lattice.' No Wigner-Weyl transform of the anisotropic vacancy is given for t'/t<2; the only defect-symbol derivation (Appendix A) is for t'/t≥2 in the sublattice basis. Consequently, the central value ν3=∓1 is not established for the anisotropic model. If intervalley scattering or the anisotropic bond pattern produces a defect phase φ(r̃) with a different winding (or extra diagonal valley terms), Eq. (6) and the headline transition would fail even though a zero mode exists by the algebraic index. The numerics shown are consistent with the index and with a localization crossover but do not isolate ν3. Please derive Eq. (5) for the anisotropic
  2. [Section 5.1/5.2, Figs. 5–7] The numerical section does not directly measure the central order parameter ν3. The IPR (Figs. 5, 6) is a property of the zero mode, which exists and remains pinned at zero for all t'/t; its minimum at criticality may reflect the bulk Lifshitz transition independently of the defect winding. The dislocation count (Fig. 7) is a valid proxy for |ν3|, but it is shown only at t'/t=1, 2, 2.01. A direct evaluation of the winding (e.g., from the numerical scattering matrix or from the phase of the chiral block on a sphere surrounding the vacancy) for several t'/t<2 values would close the evidence gap and support the claim that the transition is topological.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 4] The phrase 'the bulk gap opens at t'/t=2' is imprecise; the gap is zero at the critical point and opens only for t'/t>2.
  2. [Section 3, after Eq. (5)] The notation ϕ(r̃)=e^{iθ̃}ϕ(r̃) uses ϕ for both the complex field and its modulus; please denote the modulus by |ϕ| to avoid confusion.
  3. [Figure 7] Show an intermediate t'/t<2 (e.g., 1.5) to substantiate the claim that the dislocation is present for all t'/t<2, not just at t'/t=1.
  4. [Figure 5] The curves are offset for clarity, which obscures the magnitude of the IPR and the size dependence. Provide unnormalized data or a finite-size scaling collapse to support the claim that the minimum sharpens with system size.
  5. [Appendix A, Eq. (A5)] The prefactor a^2/2 and its appearance in Eq. (7) as a^2 Vx is not intuitive; check the dimensional consistency and define Vx, Vy explicitly in the main text for readability.
  6. [References [11] and [13]] These entries have incomplete or nonstandard bibliographic data (missing journal title; unusual DOI). Please correct.
  7. [Abstract and Section 1] The phrase 'a single missing atom can drive a topological phase transition' is potentially misleading; the transition is tuned by t'/t, with the vacancy serving as the observable. Rephrase to avoid implying the vacancy itself is the tuning parameter.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Below-transition nu3=∓1 is read off from the assumed vortex ansatz phi=e^{i theta} phi(r), so that value is an input to the calculation; the transition itself is independently supported.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3, between Eqs. (5) and (6); Appendix B, last paragraph before 'Collapse above the transition']
    "where φ(r̃)=φ1+iφ2=e^{iθ̃}φ(r̃) encodes the vacancy perturbation ... For a single vacancy, φ=e^{iθ̃}φ(r̃) gives w[φ]=+1 and hence ν3=∓1, reproducing Eq. (6)."

    Eq. (6) (and Eq. (A11)) defines nu3 as the winding number of the phase of phi. The paper's only derivation of the value ∓1 is the statement that phi has the vortex form e^{i theta} phi(r), whose phase winding is identically +1; the Dirac-cone chirality sign then gives ∓1. Thus the below-transition invariant is the assumed defect-phase winding restated, not a microscopic prediction for the anisotropic vacancy. No Wigner-Weyl symbol for the anisotropic-bond vacancy is computed; the isotropic profile is carried over by the asserted coordinate transformation (r,theta)->(rtilde,theta_tilde). The transition to nu3=0 is nevertheless independent of this circular step.

full rationale

The paper's genuinely new claim—the collapse of nu3 at t'/t=2—does not reduce to a fit. The critical point is taken from the independently known Dirac-point merging (Montambaux et al.; also vx->0 in Eq. (3)), and the collapse follows from pi3(U(1))=0, an external mathematical fact. The numerical IPR minimum and dislocation disappearance are consistent with the transition and are not fitted to the winding number. However, Section 3's derivation of the below-transition value is tautological in a limited way: Eq. (6) defines nu3 as the winding of phi, and the paper supplies phi=e^{i theta} phi(r), which has winding +1 by inspection, so nu3=∓1 is the ansatz restated. The anisotropic extension is asserted via a coordinate transformation plus same-group prior work [5,6,12,13] rather than a fresh microscopic computation; this is partly a completeness/risk issue, but it also means the below-transition value is imported rather than independently predicted here. Since the central transition claim has independent content and the zero-mode existence is fixed by the Atiyah-Singer index for all t'/t, the circularity is partial, not total.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard topological-index theorems and the assumed low-energy form of the vacancy potential; no free parameters are fitted to data. The effective defect phases φ1 and φ2 are not independent postulated entities, only components of the known vacancy perturbation.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem: in a periodic bulk, Dirac/Weyl valleys appear in pairs of opposite topological charge, so bulk invariants vanish.
    Used in Section 2 to establish the pristine lattice is trivial for all t'/t.
  • standard math Atiyah-Singer index theorem for chiral operators: Index(D̂) = dim ker D̂ − dim ker D̂† = V_B − V_A for sublattice vacancies.
    Used in Sections 3 and 4 to guarantee one zero mode for every t'/t.
  • standard math π3(U(m)) = Z for m ≥ 2 and π3(U(1)) = 0.
    Used to conclude the winding collapses when m goes from 2 to 1.
  • domain assumption In the anisotropic honeycomb lattice, the Dirac valleys merge at t'/t=2 and a semi-Dirac dispersion opens above.
    Adopted from Montambaux et al.; determines the critical point.
  • domain assumption A single vacancy can be represented as a chiral-symmetric local potential whose Wigner-Weyl transform yields Eq. (5) below and Eqs. (7)-(8) above.
    Underpins the computation of ν3; not microscopically re-derived for the anisotropic case.
  • domain assumption The low-energy continuum description near the Dirac/semi-Dirac points captures the topological winding of the vacancy.
    Used throughout; standard for the Weyl-symbol defect framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vacancy-Induced Topological Phase Transition via Valley Annihilation in an Anisotropic Honeycomb Lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YG3GMRHF

@misc{pith2026260716965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vacancy-Induced Topological Phase Transition via Valley Annihilation in an Anisotropic Honeycomb Lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YG3GMRHF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16965}
}
abstract

A single missing atom can drive a topological phase transition in a lattice that is otherwise trivial for all values of its parameters. We demonstrate this in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with anisotropic nearest-neighbor hopping ratio $t'/t$. The pristine lattice is topologically trivial for all $t'/t$ by the Nielsen-Ninomiya fermion-doubling theorem: Dirac valleys appear in pairs whose topological charges cancel identically in any bulk invariant. A single vacancy breaks this cancelation, acting as an internal boundary with defect winding number $\nu_3=\mp 1$ for $t'/t<2$. At $t'/t=2$, the two Dirac valleys merge and annihilate; the number of active pseudospinor degrees of freedom drops from $m=2$ to $m=1$, violating the condition $d+D+1=2m$ required for a non-trivial winding number. The winding number collapses to $\nu_3=0$: a topological phase transition within a fixed symmetry class (BDI), driven entirely by a bulk Lifshitz transition and observable only through the vacancy. The defect zero mode crosses over from algebraic (${\sim}1/r$) to stronger spatial confinement, with its inverse participation ratio reaching a sharp minimum at criticality. Wavefront dislocations in the local density of states provide a direct, spatially resolved image of $\nu_3$, accessible in graphene and in photonic and cold-atom analogs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16965 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Anisotropic honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor hopping ampli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the Dirac points with hopping anisotropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Zero-mode probability density for t ′/t < 2 (periodic boundary condi￾tions). (a) t ′/t = 1: long-ranged, weight on sublattice B only. (b) t ′/t = 1.5: mode spreads directionally but remains long-ranged and sublattice polarized. 4 Defect topology above the transition and the transition mechanism Before computing the Weyl symbol above the transition, we clarify a distinction that is inessential below t ′/t = 2 but bec… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical vacancy zero-mode probability density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalised IPR of the vacancy zero mode vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Disorder-averaged IPR vs. t ′/t (two system sizes; bond disorder δt ∈ [−0.01t, 0.01t]; 100 realisations per point). The transition feature at t ′/t = 2 is robust; maximum deviation from the clean result is ∼10%. tion is inverted: the bulk undergoes a Lifshitz transitio…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Wavefront dislocations in the vacancy-induced LDOS. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer,Nonstandard symmetry classes in meso- scopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1142

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.1142 1997

  2. [2]

    Kitaev,Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Confer- ence Proceedings1134(1), 22 (2009), doi:10.1063/1.3149495

    A. Kitaev,Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Confer- ence Proceedings1134(1), 22 (2009), doi:10.1063/1.3149495

    doi:10.1063/1.3149495 2009

  3. [3]

    A.P.Schnyder, S.Ryu, A.FurusakiandA.W.W.Ludwig,Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195125. 11 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.195125 2008

  4. [4]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane,Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B82, 115120 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115120

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.115120 2010

  5. [5]

    A. Goft, Y. Abulafia, N. Orion, C. L. Schochet and E. Akkermans,De- fects in graphene: A topological description, Phys. Rev. B108, 054101 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.054101 2023

  6. [6]

    Engineering Topological Materials

    A. Goft and E. Akkermans,Engineering topological materials(2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.04927,2508.04927

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04927 2025

  7. [7]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,Absence of neutrinos on a lattice: I. Proof by homo- topy theory, Nuclear Physics B185, 20 (1981), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90361-8

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90361-8 1981

  8. [8]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,Absence of neutrinos on a lattice: II. Intuitive topological proof, NuclearPhysicsB193, 173(1981), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90524- 1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90524- 1981

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Montambaux, F

    G. Montambaux, F. Piéchon, J.-N. Fuchs and M. O. Goerbig,A universal Hamil- tonian for motion and merging of Dirac points in a two-dimensional crystal, The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems72(4), 509 (2009), doi:10.1140/epjb/e2009-00383-0

    2009 doi

  2. [10]

    Montambaux, F

    G. Montambaux, F. Piéchon, J. N. Fuchs and M. O. Goerbig,Merging of dirac points in a two-dimensional crystal80(15), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.153412

    doi

  3. [11]

    R. d. Gail, J.-N. Fuchs, M. O. Goerbig, F. Piéchon and G. Montam- baux,Manipulation of dirac points in graphene-like crystals407(11), 1948, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2012.01.072

    1948 doi

  4. [12]

    Abulafia, A

    Y. Abulafia, A. Goft, N. Orion and E. Akkermans,Wavefronts Dislocations Measure Topology in Graphene with Defects(2023), ArXiv: 2307.05185

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Abulafia, A

    Y. Abulafia, A. Goft, N. Orion and E. Akkermans,Defects potentials for two-dimensional topological materials, Phys. Rev. B113, 045102 (2026), doi:10.1103/mw16-6bwh

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    Kelly and N

    K. Kelly and N. Halas,Determination ofαandβsite defects on graphite using c60-adsorbed stm tips, Surface Science416(1), L1085 (1998), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00622-0

    1998 doi

  7. [15]

    M. M. Ugeda, I. Brihuega, F. Guinea and J. M. Gómez-Rodríguez,Missing atom as a source of carbon magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 096804 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.096804

    2010 doi

  8. [16]

    Ovdat, J

    O. Ovdat, J. Mao, Y. Jiang, E. Y. Andrei and E. Akkermans,Observing a scale anomaly and a universal quantum phase transition in graphene, Nature Communica- tions8(507) (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    V. M. Pereira, F. Guinea, J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres and A. H. Castro Neto,Disorder induced localized states in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 036801 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.036801

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    V. M. Pereira, J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos and A. H. Castro Neto,Modeling disorder in graphene, Phys. Rev. B77, 115109 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115109. 12 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    Amara, S

    H. Amara, S. Latil, V. Meunier, P. Lambin and J.-C. Charlier,Scanning tunneling microscopy fingerprints of point defects in graphene: A theoretical prediction, Phys. Rev. B76, 115423 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.115423

    2007 doi

  12. [20]

    J. J. Palacios, J. Fernández-Rossier and L. Brey,Vacancy-induced mag- netism in graphene and graphene ribbons, Phys. Rev. B77, 195428 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.195428

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    Dutreix, L

    C. Dutreix, L. Bilteanu, A. Jagannathan and C. Bena,Friedel oscillations at the dirac cone merging point in anisotropic graphene and graphenelike materials, Phys. Rev. B 87, 245413 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245413

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    Godsil and G

    C. Godsil and G. Royle,Line Graphs and Eigenvalues, pp. 265–278, Springer New York, New York, NY, ISBN 978-1-4613-0163-9, doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9_12 (2001)

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    Faccio, L

    R. Faccio, L. Fernández-Werner, H. Pardo, C. Goyenola, O. N. Ventura and Á. W. Mombrú,Electronic and structural distortions in graphene induced by carbon vacancies and boron doping, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C114(44), 18961 (2010), doi:10.1021/jp106764h

    2010 doi

  16. [24]

    W. B. L. Gao Yang, Lihua Li and M. C. Ng,Structure of graphene and its disor- ders: a review, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials19(1), 613 (2018), doi:10.1080/14686996.2018.1494493, PMID: 30181789,https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14686996.2018.1494493

    2018

  17. [25]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer,The index of elliptic operators: I, Annals of Mathe- matics87(3), 484 (1968)

    1968

  18. [26]

    Eguchi, P

    T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey and A. J. Hanson,Gravitation, Gauge Theories and Differ- ential Geometry, Phys. Rept.66, 213 (1980), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(80)90130-1

    1980 doi

  19. [27]

    D. S. Freed,The Atiyah–Singer index theorem, Bull. Am. Math. Soc.58(4), 517 (2021), doi:10.1090/bull/1747,2107.03557

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Roe,Elliptic operators, topology and asymptotic methods, Acta Applicandae Math- ematica20(1), 193 (1990), doi:10.1007/BF00046916

    J. Roe,Elliptic operators, topology and asymptotic methods, Acta Applicandae Math- ematica20(1), 193 (1990), doi:10.1007/BF00046916

    1990 doi

  21. [29]

    Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics, Graduate student series in physics

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics, Graduate student series in physics. Hilger, Bristol (1990)

    1990

  22. [30]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer,The index of elliptic operators on compact manifolds, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society69(3), 422 (1963)

    1963

  23. [31]

    P. W. Anderson,Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492

    1958 doi

  24. [32]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin,Fluctuations of the inverse participation ratio at the ander- son transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3690 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3690

    2000 doi

  25. [33]

    Monthus and T

    C. Monthus and T. Garel,Anderson localization of phonons in dimensiond= 1,2,3: Finite-size properties of the inverse participation ratios of eigenstates, Phys. Rev. B 81, 224208 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.224208

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev and A. Szameit,Photonic floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013), doi:10.1038/nature12066. 13 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    Tarruell, D

    L. Tarruell, D. Greif, T. Uehlinger, G. Jotzu and T. Esslinger,Creating, moving and merging dirac points with a fermi gas in a tunable honeycomb lattice, Nature483, 302 (2012), doi:10.1038/nature10871

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    W. B. Case,Wigner functions and weyl transforms for pedestrians, American Journal of Physics76, 937 (2008), doi:10.1119/1.2957889

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    Hillery, R

    M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully and E. P. Wigner,Distribution func- tions in physics: Fundamentals, Physics Reports106, 121 (1984), doi:10.1016/0370- 1573(84)90160-1. 14

    1984 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.