Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 107 references

Layer Edelstein Effect

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An in-plane current drives opposite spin magnetizations on the two layers of a stacked bilayer; the effect is generic, governed only by the bilayer's point-group symmetry, and realizable in any of the 80 layer groups.

desk verdict The Type-I layer Edelstein effect is a real, useful result; the claim that all 80 layer groups host it rests on a Type-II argument that fails at linear order. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17209 v1 pith:RPGGPVS3 submitted 2026-07-19 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Binchang Zhou , Pan Zhou , Baoru Pan , Yuzhong Hu , Songmin Liu , Lizhong Sun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords layerEdelsteineffectcurrent-inducedspinpolarizationbilayerstackinggroupsymmetryspin-orbitcouplingelectricfieldcontroltransitionmetaldichalcogenides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the layer Edelstein effect (LEE), a current-induced spin phenomenon in stacked bilayers: an in-plane charge current produces spin magnetizations on the top and bottom layers that point in opposite directions, even when the bilayer as a whole is inversion-symmetric and has zero net magnetization. Using a minimal bilayer model and a general stacking theory, the authors show that the LEE is a generic, symmetry-governed response: its existence is determined solely by the bilayer point group, specifically by the presence of at least one layer-exchanging symmetry operation. This criterion makes the effect ubiquitous—any of the 80 layer-group materials can realize it through an appropriate stacking. The paper identifies two universal manifestations (explicitly symmetry-forced opposite components, and components activated by an out-of-plane electric field) and confirms both with first-principles calculations on MoSSe, MoTe2, and WTe2 bilayers. Because an electric field selects which layer carries the magnetization and reverses its sign, the LEE offers an electrical route to writing and switching layer-resolved spin states.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bilayer point group LG_B, built by a stacking operator P̂ acting on a monolayer layer group LG_L; it splits into layer-preserving (LG_intra) and layer-exchanging (LG_inter) operations. The response is the layer-resolved Edelstein tensor χ, a second-rank axial tensor whose allowed components are fixed by the point group (Neumann's principle). The key move: a layer-exchanging operation forces χ^{L'}_{ij} = -χ^{L}_{ij} (Type-I), or, once an out-of-plane electric field breaks LG_inter, makes field reversal equivalent to layer exchange, yielding opposite layer magnetizations (Type-II). This turns the LEE into a table-lookup classification over the 80 layer groups.

What would settle it

Compute the layer-resolved Edelstein tensor for an inversion-stacked MoSSe bilayer using full first-principles methods that include all interlayer hybridization, and check whether an in-plane current produces exactly opposite layer magnetizations that flip with the out-of-plane field; if the layer-opposite relation fails or the response vanishes despite the bilayer having a layer-exchanging operation, the symmetry-only criterion is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the layer Edelstein effect is a universal symmetry-governed response of nonmagnetic bilayers—whether a stacked bilayer shows opposite current-induced spin magnetizations on its two layers is fixed entirely by its point-group symmetry, and the decisive condition is the presence of at least one layer-exchanging operation. Inversion symmetry does not forbid it. The paper derives this criterion by combining a minimal bilayer band model with an enumeration of all 80 layer groups under a general stacking-operator framework, and verifies the response in first-principles calculations on bilayer MoSSe, MoTe2, and WTe2. Two mechanisms emerge: Type-I, where the monolayer's Ede

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry argument treats the bilayer as two independent layers whose spin magnetizations add up, which presumes that interlayer hybridization is weak enough not to mix the layer-resolved spin responses; the paper only states that interlayer tunneling 'can be substantially suppressed' without giving quantitative conditions in the main text.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any of the 80 layer-group materials can exhibit the LEE in some stacking configuration, so materials discovery reduces to reading off the bilayer point group from Table I.
  • An out-of-plane electric field (as in a dual-gated device) selects which layer hosts the induced magnetization and reverses the sign of the response, providing an electrical on/off and sign switch.
  • Because inversion symmetry does not forbid the LEE, centrosymmetric bilayers—usually dismissed for Edelstein-type responses—become viable candidates for current-induced spin generation.
  • In Type-II systems the electric field is necessary, not just a fine-tuner: the layer-opposite spin response appears only under a field and flips when the field reverses, a clean switch.
  • First-principles calculations on bilayer MoSSe, MoTe2, and WTe2 indicate the predicted LEE magnitudes are observable, including at finite temperature in realistic van der Waals devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A likely extension is the layer-resolved orbital Edelstein effect: the same layer-group decomposition should apply to orbital magnetization, yielding an analogous orbital LEE with Type-I/II classifications.
  • Because sliding one layer changes the stacking operator and therefore the bilayer point group, sliding ferroelectricity could act as a mechanical switch to toggle the LEE on and off—a natural mechanical analogue to the electric-field switch studied here.
  • The layer-opposite relation may blur if interlayer hybridization is strong; a testable prediction is that the LEE magnitude and layer contrast should decrease as interlayer spacing shrinks, which could be checked by first-principles calculations at varying distances.
  • The Table I enumeration suggests a high-throughput screening recipe: for any pair of monolayers with known layer groups, enumerate stacking operators and look up the permitted point group to predict which stacks show LEE, potentially mapping the entire space of van der Waals heterostructures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the layer Edelstein effect (LEE), a current-induced spin response in bilayers where the top and bottom layers acquire opposite spin magnetizations. Using a k·p model, symmetry analysis based on layer-group stacking, and first-principles calculations, the authors claim that the LEE is a generic symmetry-governed phenomenon: its existence depends only on the bilayer point group, and any of the 80 layer-group materials can realize it through an appropriate stacking configuration. Two mechanisms are proposed: Type-I, where interlayer-inversion symmetry enforces opposite layer-resolved Edelstein tensors; and Type-II, where an out-of-plane electric field activates the response and allegedly enforces layer-opposite magnetizations. The paper includes calculations for MoSSe, MoTe2, and WTe2 bilayers.

Significance. The concept of a layer-resolved Edelstein effect is timely and would be a valuable generalization of hidden spin polarization to current-induced phenomena. The Type-I mechanism is well grounded in standard symmetry arguments and, if validated, would provide a simple design criterion for gate-controlled layer-selective spin generation. The paper also provides first-principles calculations and a symmetry table covering all bilayer point groups. However, the Type-II mechanism, which underpins the universality claim for centrosymmetric and high-symmetry monolayers, is not rigorously established and, as argued below, the presented symmetry treatment is likely incorrect. The broad claim that all 80 layer groups can realize the LEE is therefore premature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Symmetry rules for LEE (Type-II)] The derivation of Type-II LEE contains a logical error. For an operation g∈LG^inter_B, the layer-resolved tensor satisfies χ^{L'}(E) = -g χ^L(-E) g^T, not χ^{L'}(E)=-χ^L(E). If the component is odd in E, as for the field-linear Rashba term, this gives χ^{L'}(E)=+χ^L(E), i.e., the same sign. The paper's statement that 'components constrained by LG^inter_B reverse sign under field inversion' is only true for the total response after accounting for the layer swap; it does not produce opposite signs at fixed E. A concrete counterexample is two identical D3h monolayers under the same field, which acquire identical Rashba coefficients and hence identical spin polarizations. The Type-II universality claim is therefore unsupported.
  2. [LEE in realistic materials (MoTe2)] The MoTe2 calculation does not validate Type-II. The reported non-zero χ_xy=-χ_yx is the global tensor of the bilayer; it is exactly the expected result if both layers have identical Rashba-type responses. The paper does not provide layer-resolved χ tensors or layer-resolved spin densities. Without these, the calculation is consistent with a uniform Edelstein effect rather than layer-opposite spins. The same applies to the WTe2 discussion in Sec. X of the SM.
  3. [Symmetry rules for LEE (Table I and Discussion)] Because Type-II is the only mechanism available for centrosymmetric monolayers and for many point groups in Table I (e.g., Ci, C2h, D4h, D6h), the conclusion that 'any of the 80 layer-group materials can realize it' is not established. The paper should either provide a corrected derivation of Type-II (e.g., showing that a field-induced layer-dependent potential yields opposite signs) or revise the universality claim to Type-I systems only. The current presentation overstates the scope of the result.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table I] Table I contains duplicate point-group labels (C2, Cs, C2v, C6 appear twice). The intended orientations should be clarified.
  2. [Eq. (2)] Equation (2) assumes a single common relaxation time; the effect of layer-dependent relaxation times on the layer-resolved tensor is not discussed.
  3. [General] A large part of the proof, including the exhaustive enumeration of stacking configurations and the derivation of the stacking operator formalism, is deferred to the Supplemental Material and to an unpublished companion paper (Ref. 88). The manuscript would benefit from including the essential steps in the main text so that the criterion can be independently checked.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The symmetry universality claim is not fitted, but the minimal k·p model assumes the effect and the stacking enumeration is deferred to a same-author companion paper.

  1. self definitional [Effective k·p model, Eq. (3)]
    "H(k)=ε0τ0⊗σ0 +t⊥τx⊗σ0 +Δτz⊗σ0 +ατz⊗(σxky−σykx) ... α is the Rashba spin-orbit coupling strength (with opposite signs in the two layers due to the τz factor)."

    The layer-opposite response is written into the Hamiltonian: the τz factor in the Rashba term assigns opposite spin textures to the two layers. The subsequent conclusion that a current induces opposite spin magnetizations is therefore a restatement of this input term, not a derived prediction. The model 'demonstrates' LEE by assuming the sign structure it sets out to establish.

  2. self citation load bearing [Symmetry rules for LEE (stacking framework; Ref. [88])]
    "Details of the dimensional extension, derivation, and matrix representations are provided in the companion paper, Ref. [88]. ... A more in-depth analysis of the group theory formalism and application are provided in Ref. [88]."

    The enumeration that underlies the claim that 'any of the 80 layer-group materials can realize it' through appropriate stacking rests on a stacking framework whose derivation is deferred to Ref. [88], a submitted companion paper by the same authors. That reference is not machine-checked, code-reproduced, or externally benchmarked, so the universality classification is supported at a key point by a self-citation rather than by a fully self-contained proof.

full rationale

Most of the paper's central derivation is not circular. The symmetry classification (Type-I/Type-II) is obtained from Neumann's principle applied to the bilayer point group and from the transformation of the second-rank axial tensor; the DFT and k·p results are validations rather than fitting targets. The Type-II argument that an LG_inter operation maps +E to -E and that the field-activated component is odd in E (so layer-opposite at fixed E) is a symmetry relation, not a fit. The two genuine circularity burdens are (i) the minimal k·p Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) already contains the τz-opposite Rashba term, so the model's 'LEE' is an input; and (ii) the detailed stacking framework and 4×4 representation needed for the 'all 80 layer groups' claim are deferred to a same-author companion paper, Ref. [88], rather than fully derived here. These weaken the self-containedness of the universality claim but do not reduce the core symmetry criterion to a fitted or definitional tautology.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central symmetry result leans on standard group theory and on a stacking framework that is partly in an unpublished companion paper. The Boltzmann formula hides a constant-τ assumption, and the layer-resolution of spin is asserted more than derived. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; LEE is a response-tensor phenomenon.

free parameters (3)
  • Rashba coupling α (k·p model) = not given; illustrative
    Appears in Eq. (3) with opposite signs in the two layers; chosen by hand to demonstrate spin-layer locking. Its value does not enter the symmetry criterion.
  • Interlayer hopping t⊥ = not given; Δ=±0.1 t⊥ used in Fig. 2
    Hand-chosen interlayer coupling in Eq. (3); the LEE conclusion is independent of its magnitude.
  • Interlayer potential Δ = ±0.1 t⊥ (model), E=±0.2 eV/Å (DFT)
    Tunable field knob that breaks inversion and shifts layer spectral weight; magnitude is an external condition, not fitted to the target effect.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Linear-response formula Eq. (2) uses a single relaxation time that cancels between spin density and current.
    Assumed without statement; if τ varies per band/k the predicted magnitude changes and the formula is not strictly valid. Entered in the paragraph before Eq. (1).
  • standard math A layer-group operation (R|τ) imposes the same tensor constraints as the point-group operation (R|0); fractional translations do not affect allowed tensor components.
    Standard group-theoretic assertion used to convert layer groups into point-group constraints throughout.
  • domain assumption The bilayer symmetry group is the union LG_intra ∪ LG_inter as constructed by Refs. [86-88], including the unified 4x4 coordinate extension.
    The enumeration of all stacking operators and the final Table I rely on this framework; the proof is in the companion paper Ref. [88] and SM Sec. III, not in the main text.
  • domain assumption Under an out-of-plane field, an LG_inter operation maps the system to the reversed-field system; tensor components constrained by LG_inter therefore reverse sign under field reversal, implying opposite layer magnetizations.
    Single-paragraph argument in the main text; if layer-resolved responses do not transform as a simple tensor (e.g., with interlayer hybridization), the opposite-sign conclusion is not guaranteed.
  • domain assumption The total spin expectation values in Eq. (2) can be decomposed into layer-resolved magnetizations, and interlayer tunneling is weak enough that χ^{L'} = -χ^L holds.
    Needed for the very definition of LEE; the main text defers the tunneling-suppression conditions to SM Sec. II.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Layer Edelstein Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RPGGPVS3

@misc{pith2026260717209,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Layer Edelstein Effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RPGGPVS3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17209}
}
abstract

Electrical control of magnetism represents a fundamental route toward next-generation spintronic functionalities. In this Letter, we introduce a universal current-induced spin phenomenon in bilayer systems, termed the layer Edelstein effect (LEE), which serves as the natural counterpart of the layer Hall effect in real space. It is defined by the emergence of layer-resolved spin magnetizations with opposite components on the top and bottom layers, driven by an in-plane charge current and controllable by an external electric field. We establish the general existence of the LEE using a minimal bilayer $k \cdot p$ theory. By combining symmetry analysis with a general bilayer stacking framework, we derive a model-independent symmetry criterion demonstrating that the LEE is generically allowed in a broad class of nonmagnetic bilayer stacking systems. We further show that the LEE admits two universal manifestations: explicit layer-opposite spin magnetization components mandated directly by symmetry, and components become activated upon symmetry reduction by external electric fields. First-principles calculations on stacked bilayer MoSSe, MoTe$_2$ and WTe$_2$ confirm the predicted effect and illustrate their experimental feasibility. Our work establishes the LEE as a generic symmetry-governed response of bilayer systems, providing a unified conceptual framework for electrically generating and manipulating layer-resolved spin polarization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17209 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the LEE. By applying a stacking op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) For the bilayer system with the stacking of inversion op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references

  1. [1]

    ˇZuti´c, J

    I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    S. D. Bader and S. S. P. Parkin, Spintronics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 71 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Fert, Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics, Rev

    A. Fert, Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1517 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    Dieny, I

    B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Fre- itas, R. Lehndorff, W. Raberg, U. Ebels, S. O. Demokritov, J. Akerman,et al., Opportunities and challenges for spin- tronics in the microelectronics industry, Nat. Electron.3, 446 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    S. K. Kim, G. S. Beach, K.-J. Lee, T. Ono, T. Rasing, and H. Yang, Ferrimagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater.21, 24 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling magnetore- sistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    S.-J. Gong, C. Gong, Y .-Y . Sun, W.-Y . Tong, C.-G. Duan, J.- H. Chu, and X. Zhang, Electrically induced 2D half-metallic antiferromagnets and spin field effect transistors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 8511 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    V . P. Amin, J. Zemen, and M. D. Stiles, Interface-generated spin currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 136805 (2018)

    2018

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    H. Ohno, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Omiya, E. Abe, T. Dietl, Y . Ohno, and K. Ohtani, Electric-field control of ferromag- netism, Nature408, 944 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    Sahoo, T

    S. Sahoo, T. Kontos, J. Furer, C. Hoffmann, M. Gr¨aber, A. Cot- tet, and C. Sch ¨onenberger, Electric field control of spin trans- port, Nat. Phys.1, 99 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Rovillain, R

    P. Rovillain, R. De Sousa, Y . Gallais, A. Sacuto, M. M´easson, D. Colson, A. Forget, M. Bibes, A. Barth´el´emy, and M. Caza- yous, Electric-field control of spin waves at room temperature in multiferroic BiFeO3, Nat. Mater.9, 975 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    S. H. Chun, Y . S. Chai, B.-G. Jeon, H. J. Kim, Y . S. Oh, I. Kim, H. Kim, B. J. Jeon, S. Y . Haam, J.-Y . Park, S. H. Lee, J.- H. Chung, J.-H. Park, and K. H. Kim, Electric field control of nonvolatile four-state magnetization at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 177201 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    S. Gong, H. Ding, W. Zhu, C. Duan, Z. Zhu, and J. Chu, A new pathway towards all-electric spintronics: electric-field con- 6 trol of spin states through surface/interface effects, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.56, 232 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Heron, J

    J. Heron, J. Bosse, Q. He, Y . Gao, M. Trassin, L. Ye, J. Clark- son, C. Wang, J. Liu, S. Salahuddin,et al., Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field, Nature516, 370 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    No ¨el, F

    P. No ¨el, F. Trier, L. M. Vicente Arche, J. Br ´ehin, D. C. Vaz, V . Garcia, S. Fusil, A. Barth´el´emy, L. Vila, M. Bibes,et al., Non-volatile electric control of spin–charge conversion in a SrTiO3 Rashba system, Nature580, 483 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    A. M. Jones, H. Yu, J. S. Ross, P. Klement, N. J. Ghimire, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Spin–layer locking effects in optical orientation of exciton spin in bilayer WSe 2, Nat. Phys.10, 130 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Polshyn, J

    H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y . Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. Mac- Donald,et al., Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator, Nature588, 66 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons in- duced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric elec- tron systems, Solid State Commun.73, 233 (1990)

    V . Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons in- duced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric elec- tron systems, Solid State Commun.73, 233 (1990)

    1990

  11. [19]

    E. L. Ivchenko and G. E. Pikus, New photogalvanic effect in gyrotropic crystals, JETP Lett.27, 640 (1978)

    1978

  12. [20]

    L. L. Tao and E. Y . Tsymbal, Spin-orbit dependence of anisotropic current-induced spin polarization, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085438 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    J. R. S ´anchez, L. Vila, G. Desfonds, S. Gambarelli, J. At- tan´e, J. De Teresa, C. Mag´en, and A. Fert, Spin-to-charge con- version using Rashba coupling at the interface between non- magnetic materials, Nat. Commun.4, 2944 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    A. R. Mellnik, J. Lee, A. Richardella, J. L. Grab, P. J. Mintun, M. H. Fischer, A. Vaezi, A. Manchon, E.-A. Kim, N. Samarth, et al., Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insula- tor, Nature511, 449 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Bihlmayer, P

    G. Bihlmayer, P. No ¨el, D. V . Vyalikh, E. V . Chulkov, and A. Manchon, Rashba-like physics in condensed matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 642 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Tenzin, A

    K. Tenzin, A. Roy, H. Jafari, B. Banas, F. T. Cerasoli, M. Date, A. Jayaraj, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, and J. Sławi ´nska, Analogs of Rashba-Edelstein effect from density functional theory, Phys. Rev. B107, 165140 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    T. S. Ghiasi, A. A. Kaverzin, P. J. Blah, and B. J. Van Wees, Charge-to-spin conversion by the Rashba–Edelstein effect in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures up to room temperature, Nano Lett.19, 5959 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Nitta, T

    J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, and T. Enoki, Gate control of spin-orbit interaction in an inverted In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As heterostructure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1335 (1997)

    1997

  19. [27]

    Y . Liu, J. Li, P. Liu, and Q. Liu, Unconventional spin tex- tures emerging from a universal symmetry theory of spin- momentum locking, npj Quantum Mater.9, 69 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Mera Acosta, L

    C. Mera Acosta, L. Yuan, G. M. Dalpian, and A. Zunger, Dif- ferent shapes of spin textures as a journey through the Bril- louin zone, Phys. Rev. B104, 104408 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Q. Shao, G. Yu, Y .-W. Lan, Y . Shi, M.-Y . Li, C. Zheng, X. Zhu, L.-J. Li, P. K. Amiri, and K. L. Wang, Strong Rashba- Edelstein effect-induced spin-orbit torques in monolayer tran- sition metal dichalcogenide/ferromagnet bilayers, Nano Lett. 16, 7514 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Senapati, A

    T. Senapati, A. K. Karnad, and K. Senapati, Phase biasing of a Josephson junction using Rashba–Edelstein effect, Nat. Commun.14, 7415 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Salemi, M

    L. Salemi, M. Berritta, A. K. Nandy, and P. M. Oppeneer, Or- bitally dominated Rashba-Edelstein effect in noncentrosym- metric antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.10, 5381 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Q. Xie, W. Lin, J. Liang, H. Zhou, M. Waqar, M. Lin, S. L. Teo, H. Chen, X. Lu, X. Shu, L. Liu, S. Chen, C. Zhou, J. Chai, P. Yang, K. P. Loh, J. Wang, W. Jiang, A. Manchon, H. Yang, and J. Chen, Rashba-Edelstein effect in the h-BN van der Waals interface for magnetization swi...

    2022

  25. [33]

    Cao, S.-Y

    P. Cao, S.-Y . Xie, X.-B. Li, and Y . Jiang, Pure out-of-plane spin polarization induced by Rashba-Type splitting, Nano Lett.25, 10287 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    R. Xie, P. Cao, Z. Xu, B. Xu, J. Fu, X. Zhu, X. Fu, S.-Y . Xie, Y . Jiang, and A. Pan, Three-dimensional Rashba spin split- ting dominated by out-of-plane spin polarization, Phys. Rev. B107, 155436 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    H. Lee, J. Im, and H. Jin, Emergence of the giant out-of-plane Rashba effect and tunable nanoscale persistent spin helix in ferroelectric SnTe thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 022411 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Lukmantoro and M

    A. Lukmantoro and M. A. U. Absor, Anisotropic Rashba splitting dominated by out-of-plane spin polarization in two- dimensional Janus XA 2Y (A=Si, Sn, Ge; X, Y=Sb, Bi) with surface imperfection, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 104005 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Trama, I

    M. Trama, I. Gaiardoni, C. Guarcello, J. I. Facio, A. Maiellaro, F. Romeo, R. Citro, and J. van den Brink, Nonlinear anoma- lous Edelstein response at altermagnetic interfaces, Phys. Rev. B112, 184404 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Johansson, B

    A. Johansson, B. G ¨obel, J. Henk, M. Bibes, and I. Mertig, Spin and orbital Edelstein effects in a two-dimensional electron gas: Theory and application to SrTiO 3 interfaces, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013275 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    El Hamdi, J.-Y

    A. El Hamdi, J.-Y . Chauleau, M. Boselli, C. Thibault, C. Gorini, A. Smogunov, C. Barreteau, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone, and M. Viret, Observation of the orbital inverse Rashba–Edelstein effect, Nat. Phys.19, 1855 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Ye, P.-F

    X.-G. Ye, P.-F. Zhu, W.-Z. Xu, T.-Y . Zhao, and Z.-M. Liao, Nonlinear spin and orbital Edelstein effect in WTe 2, Phys. Rev. B110, L201407 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    S. Ding, Z. Liang, D. Go, C. Yun, M. Xue, Z. Liu, S. Becker, W. Yang, H. Du, C. Wang, Y . Yang, G. Jakob, M. Kl ¨aui, Y . Mokrousov, and J. Yang, Observation of the orbital Rashba- Edelstein magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 067201 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    H. Xu, J. Zhou, H. Wang, and J. Li, Light-induced static magnetization: Nonlinear Edelstein effect, Phys. Rev. B103, 205417 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    N. A. A. Pari, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Nonrelativistic linear Edelstein ef- fect in helical EuIn2As2, Phys. Rev. B112, 024404 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, P

    R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, P. Ritzinger, K. V`yborn`y, J. ˇZelezn`y, and A. Manchon, Non-relativistic torque and Edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets, Nat. Commun.15, 7663 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Birk Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly efficient non- relativistic Edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets, Nat. Commun.16, 7270 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Q. Song, J. Mi, D. Zhao, T. Su, W. Yuan, W. Xing, Y . Chen, T. Wang, T. Wu, X. H. Chen,et al., Spin injection and inverse Edelstein effect in the surface states of topological Kondo in- sulator SmB6, Nat. Commun.7, 13485 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Q. Song, H. Zhang, T. Su, W. Yuan, Y . Chen, W. Xing, J. Shi, J. Sun, and W. Han, Observation of inverse Edelstein effect in Rashba-split 2DEG between SrTiO 3 and LaAlO 3 at room temperature, Sci. Adv.3, e1602312 (2017). 7

    2017

  40. [48]

    Y . Liu, Y . Feng, Y . Dai, B. Huang, and Y . Ma, Engineering lay- ertronics in two-dimensional ferromagnetic multiferroic lat- tice, Nano Lett.24, 3507 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    J. Zhao, Y . Feng, Y . Dai, B. Huang, and Y . Ma, Ferroelec- trovalley in two-dimensional multiferroic lattices, Nano Lett. 24, 10490 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Zhang, X

    T. Zhang, X. Xu, J. Guo, Y . Dai, and Y . Ma, Layer-polarized anomalous Hall effects from inversion-symmetric single-layer lattices, Nano Lett.24, 1009 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    W. Xun, C. Wu, H. Sun, W. Zhang, Y .-Z. Wu, and P. Li, Co- existing magnetism, ferroelectric, and ferrovalley multiferroic in stacking-dependent two-dimensional materials, Nano Lett. 24, 3541 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    B. Pan, P. Zhou, Y . Hu, S. Liu, B. Zhou, H. Xiao, X. Yang, and L. Sun, Floquet-induced altermagnetic transition inA-type antiferromagnetic bilayers, Phys. Rev. B112, 224430 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Gao, Y .-F

    A. Gao, Y .-F. Liu, C. Hu, J.-X. Qiu, C. Tzschaschel, B. Ghosh, S.-C. Ho, D. B´erub´e, R. Chen, H. Sun,et al., Layer Hall effect in a 2D topological axion antiferromagnet, Nature595, 521 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Y . Feng, Y . Dai, B. Huang, L. Kou, and Y . Ma, Layer Hall effect in multiferroic two-dimensional materials, Nano Lett. 23, 5367 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Y . Han, Y . Guo, Z. Li, and Z. Qiao, Layer Hall effect without external electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 236206 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Chen, H.-P

    R. Chen, H.-P. Sun, M. Gu, C.-B. Hua, Q. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Layer Hall effect induced by hidden Berry curvature in antiferromagnetic insulators, Nat. Sci. Rev.11, nwac140 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Yi, C.-B

    X.-X. Yi, C.-B. Hua, R. Chen, and B. Zhou, Disorder- enhanced layer Hall effect in a magnetic sandwich heterostruc- ture, Phys. Rev. B109, 115301 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    C. Xiao, H. Liu, W. Wu, H. Wang, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic nonlinear electric spin generation in centrosymmetric magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 086602 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    C. Xiao, W. Wu, H. Wang, Y .-X. Huang, X. Feng, H. Liu, G.-Y . Guo, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, Time-reversal-even non- linear current induced spin polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 166302 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    A. Roy, F. T. Cerasoli, A. Jayaraj, K. Tenzin, M. B. Nardelli, and J. Sławi´nska, Long-range current-induced spin accumula- tion in chiral crystals, npj Comput. Mater.8, 243 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    J. M. Ziman,Principles of the Theory of Solids(Cambridge university press, 1979)

    1979

  54. [62]

    El-Batanouny and F

    M. El-Batanouny and F. Wooten,Symmetry and Condensed Matter Physics: A Computational Approach(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    See Supplemental Material for the constitutive relation of the second-rank axial response tensor, potential interlayer tunnel- ing, bilayer-stacking theory and symmetry criteria for realiz- ing the LEE, representative candidate materials and general stacking operators, the spi...

  56. [64]

    Manti, M

    S. Manti, M. K. Svendsen, N. R. Knøsgaard, P. M. Lyngby, and K. S. Thygesen, Exploring and machine learning struc- tural instabilities in 2D materials, npj Comput. Mater.9, 33 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    J. Shi, H. Xu, C. Heide, C. HuangFu, C. Xia, F. de Quesada, H. Shen, T. Zhang, L. Yu, A. Johnson,et al., Giant room- temperature nonlinearities in a monolayer janus topological semiconductor, Nat. Commun.14, 4953 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Y . A. Bychkov and ´E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP Lett.39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  60. [68]

    Johansson, J

    A. Johansson, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effect for anisotropic two-dimensional elec- tron gas and topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 195440 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Liu, J.-W. Luo, A. J. Freeman, and A. Zunger, Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals, Nat. Phys.10, 387 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    W. Yao, E. Wang, H. Huang, K. Deng, M. Yan, K. Zhang, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, L. Li, Y . Wang,et al., Direct observa- tion of spin-layer locking by local rashba effect in monolayer semiconducting PtSe2 film, Nat. Commun.8, 14216 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    Jafari, A

    H. Jafari, A. Roy, and J. Sławi ´nska, Ferroelectric control of charge-to-spin conversion in WTe 2, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, L091404 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    Popoola, R

    A. Popoola, R. Kashikar, A. Azmy, I. Spanopoulos, H. Jafari, J. Sławi´nska, S. Witanachchi, S. Lisenkov, and I. Ponomareva, Mechanically and electrically tunable Rashba-Edelstein effect in ferroelectric semiconductors, CsGeX 3 (X=I, Br, Cl), Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 084412 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Tenzin, A

    K. Tenzin, A. Roy, F. T. Cerasoli, A. Jayaraj, M. B. Nardelli, and J. Sławi ´nska, Collinear Rashba-Edelstein effect in non- magnetic chiral materials, Phys. Rev. B108, 245203 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    Furukawa, Y

    T. Furukawa, Y . Shimokawa, K. Kobayashi, and T. Itou, Ob- servation of current-induced bulk magnetization in elemental tellurium, Nat. Commun.8, 954 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo,et al., Quantum Espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys: Condens. Matter21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  68. [76]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni,et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum Espresso, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu, Comput

    A. Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu, Comput. Mater. Sci.95, 337 (2014)

    2014

  70. [78]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gra- dient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  71. [79]

    M. N. Ali, J. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q. D. Gibson, L. M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N. P. Ong,et al., Large, non-saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2, Nature514, 205 (2014)

    2014

  72. [80]

    M. B. Nardelli, F. T. Cerasoli, M. Costa, S. Curtarolo, R. De Gennaro, M. Fornari, L. Liyanage, A. R. Supka, and H. Wang, PAOFLOW: A utility to construct and operate on ab initio Hamiltonians from the projections of electronic wave- functions on atomic orbital bases, including...

    2018

  73. [81]

    F. T. Cerasoli, A. R. Supka, A. Jayaraj, M. Costa, I. Siloi, J. Sławi´nska, S. Curtarolo, M. Fornari, D. Ceresoli, and M. B. Nardelli, Advanced modeling of materials with PAOFLOW 2.0: New features and software design, Comput. Mater. Sci. 200, 110828 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    Y . Lu, Y . Zhang, C.-Y . Yang, S. Revuelta, H. Qi, C. Huang, 8 W. Jin, Z. Li, V . Vega-Mayoral, Y . Liu,et al., Precise tuning of interlayer electronic coupling in layered conductive metal- organic frameworks, Nat. Commun.13, 7240 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    Z.-M. Yu, S. Guan, X.-L. Sheng, W. Gao, and S. A. Yang, Valley-layer coupling: A new design principle for valleytron- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 037701 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Bradley and A

    C. Bradley and A. Cracknell,The mathematical theory of sym- metry in solids: representation theory for point groups and space groups(Oxford University Press, 2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    Brinkman and R

    W. Brinkman and R. Elliott, Space group theory for spin waves, J. Appl. Phys.37, 1457 (1966)

    1966

  78. [86]

    J. Ji, G. Yu, C. Xu, and H. J. Xiang, General theory for bilayer stacking ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 146801 (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    B. Pan, P. Zhou, P. Lyu, H. Xiao, X. Yang, and L. Sun, General stacking theory for altermagnetism in bilayer systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166701 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    B. Zhou, P. Zhou, B. Pan, Y . Hu, S. Liu, and L. Sun, Control of the Rashba-Edelstein effect via sliding ferroelectricity in bilayer systems, (submitted)

  81. [89]

    A.-Y . Lu, H. Zhu, J. Xiao, C.-P. Chuu, Y . Han, M.-H. Chiu, C.- C. Cheng, C.-W. Yang, K.-H. Wei, Y . Yang,et al., Janus mono- layers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 744 (2017)

    2017

  82. [90]

    C. Liu, T. Liang, X. Sui, L. Du, Q. Guo, G. Xue, C. Huang, Y . You, G. Yao, M. Zhao,et al., Anomalous photovoltaics in Janus MoSSe monolayers, Nat. Commun.16, 544 (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    K. Wang, R. Xu, Y . Wei, J. Wang, Y . Zhang, Y . Hao, J. Zhou, M. Qiu, and G. Hao, Controlled synthesis of large-area mono- layer Janus MoSSe nanostructures based on interface strain- induced strategy, Appl. Phys. Lett.127, 251601 (2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    Y . A. Korkmaz, C. Bulutay, and C. Sevik, k· p parametriza- tion and linear and circular dichroism in strained monolayer (Janus) transition metal dichalcogenides from first-principles, J. Phys. Chem. C125, 7439 (2021)

    2021

  85. [93]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y . Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in altermagnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    F. Xia, D. B. Farmer, Y .-m. Lin, and P. Avouris, Graphene field-effect transistors with high on/offcurrent ratio and large transport band gap at room temperature, Nano Lett.10, 715 (2010)

    2010

  87. [95]

    Y . Wang, J. Xiao, H. Zhu, Y . Li, Y . Alsaid, K. Y . Fong, Y . Zhou, S. Wang, W. Shi, Y . Wang,et al., Structural phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 driven by electrostatic doping, Nature550, 487 (2017)

    2017

  88. [96]

    V . O. Khaustov, D. Convertino, J. K ¨oster, A. A. Za- kharov, M. J. Mohn, Z. M. Gebeyehu, L. Martini, S. Pace, G. Marini, M. Calandra, U. Kaiser, S. Forti, and C. Coletti, Heterocontact-triggered 1H to 1T’ phase transition in CVD- grown monolayer MoTe2: Implications for low c...

    2024

  89. [97]

    Ruppert, B

    C. Ruppert, B. Aslan, and T. F. Heinz, Optical properties and band gap of single- and few-layer MoTe2 crystals, Nano Lett. 14, 6231 (2014)

    2014

  90. [98]

    Chang, W

    C. Chang, W. Chen, Y . Chen, Y . Chen, Y . Chen, F. Ding, C. Fan, H. J. Fan, Z. Fan, C. Gong,et al., Recent progress on two-dimensional materials, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin.37, 2108017 (2021)

    2021

  91. [99]

    M. N. Gjerding, A. Taghizadeh, A. Rasmussen, S. Ali, F. Bertoldo, T. Deilmann, N. R. Knøsgaard, M. Kruse, A. H. Larsen, S. Manti,et al., Recent progress of the computational 2D materials database (C2DB), 2D Mater.8, 044002 (2021)

    2021

  92. [100]

    Pakdel, A

    S. Pakdel, A. Rasmussen, A. Taghizadeh, M. Kruse, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, High-throughput computational stacking reveals emergent properties in natural van der Waals multifer- roic bilayers, Nat. Commun.15, 932 (2024)

    2024

  93. [101]

    Chhowalla, D

    M. Chhowalla, D. Jena, and H. Zhang, Two-dimensional semi- conductors for transistors, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 1 (2016)

    2016

  94. [102]

    Fiori, F

    G. Fiori, F. Bonaccorso, G. Iannaccone, T. Palacios, D. Neu- maier, A. Seabaugh, S. K. Banerjee, and L. Colombo, Elec- tronics based on two-dimensional materials, Nat. Nanotech- nol.9, 768 (2014)

    2014

  95. [103]

    Chhowalla, H

    M. Chhowalla, H. S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J. Li, K. P. Loh, and H. Zhang, The chemistry of two-dimensional layered tran- sition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets, Nat. Chem.5, 263 (2013)

    2013

  96. [104]

    Manipatruni, D

    S. Manipatruni, D. E. Nikonov, C.-C. Lin, T. A. Gosavi, H. Liu, B. Prasad, Y .-L. Huang, E. Bonturim, R. Ramesh, and I. A. Young, Scalable energy-efficient magnetoelectric spin- orbit logic, Nature565, 35 (2019)

    2019

  97. [105]

    ˇZelezn´y, H

    J. ˇZelezn´y, H. Gao, K. V´yborn´y, J. Zemen, J. Maˇsek, A. Man- chon, J. Wunderlich, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Relativistic N´eel-Order fields induced by electrical current in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 157201 (2014)

    2014

  98. [106]

    K. Shen, G. Vignale, and R. Raimondi, Microscopic theory of the inverse Edelstein effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 096601 (2014)

    2014

  99. [107]

    X. Li, H. Chen, and Q. Niu, Out-of-plane carrier spin in transition-metal dichalcogenides under electric current, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 16749 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.