Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The spin TWA's stochastic equations can be derived from a path integral, provided the dissipator's operator products are mapped onto curved phase space with the star product.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 18:25 UTC pith:4VJTGHRV

load-bearing objection Useful review of continuous TWA for spins with a genuine but under-supported path-integral claim; worth a serious referee, but the abstract oversells what is actually shown. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17295 v1 pith:4VJTGHRV submitted 2026-07-19 quant-ph

Truncated Wigner approximation for spins in continuous phase space

Jens Hartmann , Tom Schlegel , Viktoria Noel , Christopher D. Mink , Michael Fleischhauer This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords truncated Wigner approximationspin-1/2 systemscontinuous SU(2) phase spacestochastic differential equationsLindblad master equationpath-integral derivationsuperradianceimaginary-time evolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops and reviews the truncated Wigner approximation (TWA) for spin-1/2 systems, a semiclassical scheme that turns many-body spin dynamics into stochastic differential equations on a continuous SU(2) phase space. Its central new claim is that these stochastic equations are not merely a heuristic truncation: they follow from a path-integral construction when the operator products in the dissipator are mapped rigorously onto the curved phase space via the star product. If correct, this gives the spin TWA a field-theoretic basis and identifies the source of small errors in a recent alternative path-integral treatment. The paper also shows that gauge freedom makes positive Wigner representations possible even for entangled states, that two-time correlations and spectra can be obtained through a phase-space quantum regression theorem, and that imaginary-time TWA becomes exact for Ising ground states at large inverse temperature. A sympathetic reader would care because the method offers a numerically inexpensive, linearly scaling route to large driven-dissipative spin ensembles, including superradiance and dissipative entanglement generation, where exact methods are impractical.

Core claim

The central claim is that the TWA stochastic equations derived from correspondence rules can equivalently be obtained from a path-integral construction, provided the operator products in the dissipator are mapped onto the curved SU(2) phase space using the star product rather than ordinary products. The paper constructs a discretized Lindblad evolution, represents each time slice in phase space, and shows that the correct star-product mapping yields exactly the same drift and diffusion terms as the direct correspondence rules. For the driven, decaying single spin this reproduces the SDEs of the earlier sections, whereas replacing star products by ordinary products produces spurious correctio

What carries the argument

The central object is the continuous SU(2) phase space: an over-complete basis of phase-point operators on a sphere of radius √3, with Weyl symbols and the Wigner function. The key identities are the direct correspondence rules, which express products of Pauli operators acting on the phase-point operator as combinations of that operator and its θ, φ derivatives; the star product, which corrects ordinary products of Weyl symbols by derivative terms to account for operator ordering; and the gauge freedom to add higher spherical-harmonic terms to the Wigner function without changing the state. These carry the argument by translating the Lindblad master equation into a Fokker-Planck equation tha

Load-bearing premise

The scheme assumes the exact equation of motion for the Wigner function can be safely truncated at second order—dropping higher-order derivatives—and that the remaining diffusion matrix can be made positive semi-definite, even though, as the paper itself states, there is no a-priori small parameter justifying the truncation and accuracy can only be judged a posteriori.

What would settle it

Take the two-atom Dicke decay benchmark of the paper and compute the exact Wigner-function equation of motion including the third- and higher-order derivative terms that TWA drops; if those terms change the predicted concurrence by more than the reported TWA error, the truncation itself—not just the approximate collective correspondence rules—is responsible for the deviation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Single-spin dynamics with coherent driving, decay, and dephasing can be simulated exactly within TWA, with deviations due only to sampling noise.
  • Two-time correlation functions and spectra, such as the Mollow triplet, can be computed with small numerical overhead using a phase-space analog of the quantum regression theorem.
  • TWA captures collective superradiant emission and can even describe dissipative generation of entangled Bell states, despite being a semiclassical approximation.
  • Imaginary-time TWA becomes exact for Ising Hamiltonians at large inverse temperature, providing a route to ground-state energies of spin-glass and optimization-type Hamiltonians, with trajectory cost that grows exponentially with system size.
  • The path-integral derivation places spin TWA on the same footing as phase-space methods for bosonic fields, where TWA emerges as the leading-order truncation of a closed-time-contour field theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The path-integral formulation suggests a systematic correction scheme: higher-order terms in the action beyond quadratic order in the response fields could be computed and used as a diagnostic for when TWA fails, rather than relying only on a posteriori comparisons with exact results.
  • The exactness of iTWA at large imaginary time for arbitrary Ising couplings hints that it could serve as a practical heuristic for optimization problems; the exponential trajectory growth likely reflects the underlying NP-hardness, so no polynomial-time guarantee should be expected.
  • The gauge freedom might be tunable per trajectory or per time step to maintain positive Wigner representations in subradiant regimes where the paper acknowledges the method fails; this is a testable extension not explored in the paper.
  • The detailed path-integral derivation is shown for single-spin dissipative dynamics; extending it to the collective correspondence rules would clarify whether those approximate rules also arise from a truncated action, and could explain why they fail for subradiant states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper is a review and methods paper on the truncated Wigner approximation (TWA) for spin-1/2 systems in a continuous SU(2) phase space. It derives direct and collective correspondence rules (Tables I–II, Eqs. (36)–(38)), obtains Fokker–Planck equations and Itô SDEs for coherent driving, decay, dephasing, spin–spin interactions, and collective dissipation, and benchmarks them against exact Bloch equations, Dicke rate equations, and exact diagonalization. It also presents a phase-space quantum regression theorem for two-time correlations, an imaginary-time extension (iTWA) for thermal and ground states, and a path-integral derivation that is claimed to recover the Sec. V SDEs once operator products in the dissipator are mapped onto the curved phase space. The central claim is that TWA for spins has a consistent field-theoretic basis, correcting the treatment of dissipative processes in Ref. [44].

Significance. The paper collects and extends an important toolkit for simulating large open spin systems, and several components are genuinely valuable: the explicit correspondence rules, the positive gauge representation for Bell states, the two-time correlation procedure, the iTWA benchmarks, and the attempt to connect TWA to a path-integral/MSRJD formulation. The benchmarks in Secs. V and VII are convincing evidence that the method works for the tested cases. However, the advertised path-integral equivalence is the main novel claim, and as printed it contains algebraic errors that invalidate the consistency check even at the single-spin level; the many-body generalization is deferred to a separate paper. These issues are correctable, but they currently block acceptance of the central claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. VIII B, Eqs. (104)–(110)] The claimed consistency check with Sec. V fails as written. Substituting (101) into S0 gives S0 = ∫ (√3/2) sinθ (φ_q θ̇ − θ_q φ̇), not √3/(2 sinθ)(...). Hence the prefactors in Eθ and Eφ in Eq. (109) should be (√3/2) sinθ, not √3/(2 sinθ). In Eq. (107) the quadratic coefficient should contain 2/√3 cosθ, not 2√3 cosθ. Solving the corrected equations gives φ̇ = Δ − Ω cotθ cosφ − 2/(√3 sinθ) ξ, whose noise variance reproduces Sec. V; as printed, Eq. (110) gives noise variance 9Γ0 at θ=π/2 whereas Sec. V gives Γ0, and the coherent dynamics also differs. Thus the path-integral derivation does not currently reproduce the SDEs it claims to recover.
  2. [Abstract; Sec. I; Sec. VIII A] The path-integral equivalence is constructed only for a single spin ('To build the path integral for a single spin'). Products of operators on distinct spins in many-body Lindbladians require star products on the product SU(2) space; the one-sided identities (92) are single-spin, and the general derivation is deferred to Ref. [45]. Since the abstract claims 'the TWA stochastic equations' (plural, many-body), the central claim outruns the evidence provided in this manuscript. Please supply the N>1 construction or restrict the claim to single-spin and state the general case as a conjecture.
  3. [Sec. VIII A, measure] The path integral switches to flat measure dθ dϕ (footnote [74]) while the phase-space calculus of Sec. III uses dΩ = sinθ dθ dϕ/(2π) (Eq. (11)). The resolution (94), the update (95), and the action (98) are formulated in flat measure; the relation of the weight Wn to the Wigner function W of Eq. (17) and to expectation values (21) is not shown. The Jacobian/normalisation is non-trivial because the derivative basis (32) is singular at the poles, and the paper itself restricts to 'away from the poles'. This leaves the single-spin derivation incomplete as written.
  4. [Sec. VI C, Eqs. (76)–(77)] The simplification f(B_j,Ω′,Ω″) = Tr_j{Δ_j(Ω′)B_jΔ_j(Ω″)} ∏_{k≠j} δ(Ω_k−Ω′_k) is justified by the claim that higher spherical harmonics vanish 'in the exact time evolution.' Under the truncated Fokker–Planck dynamics actually simulated, W(Ω″,t) need not stay in the l≤1 subspace, so this is an additional approximation. The paper should state this explicitly or prove that the chosen FPE preserves the subspace.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V A, Eq. (4)] The SDEs are written in Itô form, but the path-integral derivation in Sec. VIII is closer to a Stratonovich/MRDJD construction. Please state the stochastic convention used in each section and how the multiplicative-noise SDEs are to be interpreted.
  2. [Fig. 13] The curve labeled 'Ref. [44]' shows a deviation, but no sampling error or trajectory number is given for that curve. Please include error bars or specify the parameters and sampling details.
  3. [Sec. VII B] The statement that iTWA 'becomes exact' for τ→∞ is specific to the Ising model because the diffusion matrix vanishes in that limit. Please phrase this as a model-specific property rather than a general exactness result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: core TWA derivations are self-contained and benchmarked against exact results; the path-integral section is an explicitly labeled equivalence/reformulation, not an independent derivation.

full rationale

The central TWA derivations are self-contained. Secs. III-IV construct the SU(2) phase space, derive the direct correspondence rules from operator identities, and obtain the EOMs; Sec. V benchmarks the resulting SDEs against independent exact solutions (Bloch equations, Dicke rate equations, exact diagonalization). These benchmarks are external and parameter-free, so the core claims do not reduce to fitted inputs. Self-citations [39,40,48] provide context and approximate collective rules, but the direct rules are re-derived here and the collective rules are validated against exact solutions, so self-citations are not load-bearing. The paper also explicitly flags its own limitations (no a-priori small parameter for truncation; failure for subradiant states; exponential trajectory scaling in hard cases), which are correctness caveats rather than circular steps. The only potential concern is Sec. VIII: the path-integral construction uses the same direct correspondence rules (Tables I/II) that produced the Sec. V SDEs, and then recovers those SDEs, with the many-body generalization deferred to Ref. [45]. Because the paper explicitly frames this as an 'equivalent route' and does not use it as the evidence for the method's accuracy, this is a consistency/reformulation result rather than a load-bearing independent derivation. Overall, no step reduces by construction to its own input, so the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data; the method's freedom enters through hand-chosen correspondence-rule bases and gauge functions, which are not treated as fitted constants. The load-bearing uncontrolled assumption is second-order truncation without a small parameter. No new physical entities are posited.

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The system dynamics is governed by a Lindblad master equation (Markovian/Born-Markov reservoir).
    All dissipative dynamics in Secs. IV-VIII start from Eq. (30); non-Markovian or strongly coupled reservoirs are outside scope.
  • standard math The Stratonovich-Weyl correspondence with phase-point operators Δ(Ω) containing only spherical harmonics l=0,1 represents all spin-1/2 operators.
    Foundational for the continuous SU(2) phase space in Sec. III; relies on completeness and orthogonality of spherical harmonics.
  • ad hoc to paper The exact Wigner-function EOM can be truncated at second order, and non-positive diffusion can be truncated or neglected.
    Admitted in Sec. IX as lacking an a-priori small parameter; all SDEs of Sec. V depend on this uncontrolled truncation.
  • domain assumption A positive Wigner function for the initial (and ideally final) state can be found via the gauge freedom.
    Stochastic sampling requires a positive initial W; Secs. II and III B show this for many states, including Bell states, but not for all states.
  • domain assumption Collective correspondence rules (36)-(37) are valid when states are expressible as collective excitations with large ∑|c_n|².
    Stated in Sec. IV C; the authors note these rules fail for subradiant states.
  • domain assumption The quantum regression theorem with a further Born-Markov approximation gives the two-time correlation dynamics.
    Sec. VI A, Eqs. (66)-(68); multi-time correlations inherit the same Lindblad-type evolution.
  • standard math Away from the poles, the four operators Δ, ∂_θΔ, ∂_φΔ, ∂²_φΔ form a complete basis, enabling the path-integral construction.
    Used in Sec. VIII A, Eqs. (92)-(96); singular at θ=0,π, where special treatment is needed.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31960 in / 16731 out tokens · 174182 ms · 2026-08-01T18:25:55.532282+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Truncated Wigner approximation for spins in continuous phase space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4VJTGHRV

@misc{pith2026260717295,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Truncated Wigner approximation for spins in continuous phase space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4VJTGHRV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17295}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We review the truncated Wigner approximation (TWA) for spins as a computationally inexpensive numerical approximation method to describe interacting and / or dissipative many-body spin systems. Using the Wigner-Moyal mapping from Hilbert space to a suitable phase space, the many-body density matrix is represented by a c-number distribution, the Wigner function. The gauge freedom in continuous phase space can be exploited to find positive Wigner functions for a large class of spin states, including entangled ones. Employing different sets of correspondence rules, we derive equations of motion for the Wigner function, which, applying controlled approximations, can be mapped to stochastic differential equations. This allows a computationally inexpensive simulation of expectation values. Using a phase-space analog of the quantum regression theorem also multi-time correlations and spectra can be obtained. To illustrate the potential of the method, we benchmark the TWA for spins with some exactly solvable problems of interacting, dissipative spin systems, and then discuss its application to collective processes, such as the superradiant emission of light. Extending the TWA to imaginary time furthermore provides a tool to approximately calculate thermal and ground states of spin Hamiltonians. Finally, we show that the TWA stochastic equations can equivalently be derived within a path-integral approach, provided that the operator products in the dissipator are rigorously mapped onto the curved phase space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17295 by Christopher D. Mink, Jens Hartmann, Michael Fleischhauer, Tom Schlegel, Viktoria Noel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The microscopic basis of a large class of quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Continuous phase-space representation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Expectation value of ˆσ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of two-spin concurrence between exact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Cigar-shaped ensemble of atoms driven perpendicular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Emitted steady-state intensity from 1000 coupled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Two-time correlation function (78) of two interact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Two-time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Average energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Population dynamics of a single two-level atom, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Path integral approach to the truncated Wigner approximation of driven-dissipative spins

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A Keldysh path-integral formulation of dissipative spin-1/2 TWA shows that SU(2) star-product corrections in the dissipative sector are essential and reproduces exact single-spin decay.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (33), which are high-order partial differential equations is in general no simplification to the full quantum problem

    Fokker-Planck equation Solving the EOM of the Wigner function, eq. (33), which are high-order partial differential equations is in general no simplification to the full quantum problem. However, under certain conditions eq. (33) can be ap- proximated by a 2N-dimensionalFokker-Planck equation (FPE). ∂ ∂t W(Ω, t) =− X j ∂ ∂xj Aj(Ω)W(Ω, t) (39) + 1 2 X jl ∂2...

  2. [2]

    Mapping to Ito stochastic differential equations The solution of the FPE, (39), can be written in terms of the conditional probabilityp(Ω, t;Ω ′,0) W(Ω, t) = Z dΩ′ p(Ω, t;Ω′,0)W 0(Ω′).(41) p(Ω, t;Ω′,0) fulfills the same Fokker-Planck EOM asW, however, with the initial condition p(Ω,0;Ω ′,0) =δ(Ω−Ω ′).(42) Thus any expectation value can be calculated in ph...

  3. [3]

    Elwetritsch

    Equations of motion Collecting the coherent (102), (104) and the dissipative parts (107), the full action reads S= Z dt h θq Eθ +ϕ q Eϕ + i 2 D θ2 q i ,(108) 21 with Eθ =− √ 3 2 sinθ cl ˙ϕcl −∂ θHcl, Eϕ = √ 3 2 sinθ cl ˙θcl −∂ ϕHcl − Γ0 2 1 + √ 3 cosθcl , D= 3Γ0 4 h 1 + cos2 θcl + 2√ 3 cosθ cl i . (109) Since only theθ 2 q entry of the noise kernel is non...

  4. [4]

    reduced density matrix For some problems, the density matrix of a reduced subset of spins is needed. If the total system consisting of subsystemsAandBis described by a density matrix ˆρ, the reduced matrix ˆρB = TrA{ˆρ}has a Weyl symbol ˆρB ← → WB(Ω) = Z A dΩA W(Ω),(22) wheredΩ A,B = Q j∈A,B dΩj is the set of angle variables corresponding to all spins inA...

  5. [5]

    Dicke superradiance FIG. 5. Emitted intensity of the initially (t= 0) fully excited Dicke model for 100 atoms. Shown is the TW A result with 2·10 3 trajectories compared to the rate equation solution for the Dicke ladder. In Fig. 5 we plot the emission dynamics of an initially inverted ensemble of 100 two-level atoms in a volume small compared to the reso...

  6. [6]

    response pair

    Collective non-Gaussian light emission from a driven ensemble of two-level emitters While the collective emission of light from an ensem- ble of atoms in a very small volume can easily be cal- culated by several methods, the theoretical treatment of spatially extended ensembles is much more involved. In Refs [41, 42] TW A simulations have been success- fu...

  7. [7]

    classical

    Coherent contributions The commutator of any spin-1/2 Hamiltonian with the phase-point operator contains only first derivatives of ˆ∆. Assembling the entries of Table I, it reads [ ˆH, ˆ∆] = 2i√ 3 sinθ ∂ϕH ∂θ ˆ∆−∂ θH ∂ϕ ˆ∆ ,(99) so that under∂ θ → −i˜θ,∂ ϕ → −i˜ϕ, we get H+ −H − =− 2√ 3 sinθ ˜ϕ ∂θH− ˜θ ∂ϕH .(100) The sided difference is thus exactly linea...

  8. [8]

    V, ˆL= √Γ0 ˆσ−, whose symbol follows from Table I:L(θ, ϕ) = (√3Γ0/2) sinθ e−iϕ

    Dissipative contributions We now evaluate the dissipative action for the spontaneous-decay channel of Sec. V, ˆL= √Γ0 ˆσ−, whose symbol follows from Table I:L(θ, ϕ) = (√3Γ0/2) sinθ e−iϕ. Expanded in the derivative ba- sis (32) via Table II, each dissipator entry is a multi- ple of ˆ∆ itself plus derivative terms. This multiple is the same for ˆσ− ˆ∆ˆσ+ an...

  9. [9]

    Spher- ical harmonicsY lm(θ, ϕ) are a set of special functions defined on the unit sphereS 2

    Definition Here we summarize some properties of spherical har- monics and list the definitions used in this paper. Spher- ical harmonicsY lm(θ, ϕ) are a set of special functions defined on the unit sphereS 2. They serve as the angular portion of the solutions to the Laplace equation in spher- ical coordinates and form an orthonormal basis for the square-i...

  10. [10]

    •Completeness:Any square-integrable function on the sphere can be expanded uniquely in terms of spherical harmonics

    Properties •Orthonormality: Z π 0 Z 2π 0 Y ∗ lm(θ, ϕ)Yl′m′(θ, ϕ) sinθ dθ dϕ=δll′δmm′. •Completeness:Any square-integrable function on the sphere can be expanded uniquely in terms of spherical harmonics. ∞X l=0 lX m=−l Ym∗ l (Ω)Ym l (Ω′) =δ(ϕ−ϕ ′)δ(cosθ−cosθ ′) = 1 2π δ(Ω−Ω ′) (111) •Conjugation symmetry: Y ∗ lm(θ, ϕ) = (−1)m Yl,−m(θ, ϕ). •T ransformation ...

  11. [11]

    Binder, Monte-Carlo methods, Mathematical Tools for Physicists , 249 (2005)

    K. Binder, Monte-Carlo methods, Mathematical Tools for Physicists , 249 (2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    A. F. Voter, Radiation effects in solids, NATO Science Series (Springer, Berlin, 2007) , 1 (2007)

    2007

  13. [13]

    M. Suzuki, Relationship between d-dimensional quan- tal spin systems and (d+1)-dimensional Ising systems: Equivalence, critical exponents and systematic approx- imants of the partition function and spin correlations, Progress of Theoretical Physics56, 1454 (1976)

    1976

  14. [14]

    Suzuki, S

    M. Suzuki, S. Miyashita, and A. Kuroda, Monte Carlo simulation of quantum spin systems. i, Progress of The- oretical Physics58, 1377 (1977)

    1977

  15. [15]

    W. M. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids, Reviews of Modern Physics73, 33 (2001)

    2001

  16. [16]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complex- ity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 170201 (2005)

    2005

  17. [17]

    J. Jin, A. Biella, O. Viyuela, L. Mazza, J. Keeling, R. Fazio, and D. Rossini, Cluster mean-field approach to the steady-state phase diagram of dissipative spin sys- tems, Physical Review X6, 031011 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Weimer, Variational principle for steady states of dis- sipative quantum many-body systems, Phys

    H. Weimer, Variational principle for steady states of dis- sipative quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 040402 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

    R. Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

    1962

  20. [20]

    Kr¨ amer and H

    S. Kr¨ amer and H. Ritsch, Generalized mean-field ap- proach to simulate the dynamics of large open spin 24 ensembles with long range interactions, The European Physical Journal D69, 282 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Robicheaux and D

    F. Robicheaux and D. A. Suresh, Beyond lowest order mean-field theory for light interacting with atom arrays, Physical Review A104, 023702 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Plankensteiner, C

    D. Plankensteiner, C. Hotter, and H. Ritsch, Quantum- cumulants. jl: A julia framework for generalized mean- field equations in open quantum systems, Quantum6, 617 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Rubies-Bigorda, S

    O. Rubies-Bigorda, S. Ostermann, and S. F. Yelin, Char- acterizing superradiant dynamics in atomic arrays via a cumulant expansion approach, Physical Review Research 5, 013091 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    S. J. Masson, J. P. Covey, S. Will, and A. Asenjo- Garcia, Dicke superradiance in ordered arrays of mul- tilevel atoms, PRX Quantum5, 010344 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Kerber, H

    J. Kerber, H. Ritsch, and L. Ostermann, The cumulants expansion approach: The good, the bad and the ugly, preprint arXiv:2511.20115 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Holzinger, O

    R. Holzinger, O. Rubies-Bigorda, S. F. Yelin, and H. Ritsch, Symmetry-based efficient simulation of higher- order coherences in quantum many-body superradiance, Physical Review Research7, 033203 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quan- tum many-body systems, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quan- tum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 040502 (2004)

    2004

  28. [28]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Ma- trix product density operators: Simulation of finite- temperature and dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004)

    2004

  29. [29]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin sys- tems, Advances in Physics57, 143 (2008)

    2008

  30. [30]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    2011

  31. [31]

    J. Cui, J. I. Cirac, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Variational ma- trix product operators for the steady state of dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 220601 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Brif and A

    C. Brif and A. Mann, Phase-space formulation of quan- tum mechanics and quantum-state reconstruction for physical systems with lie-group symmetries, Phys. Rev. A59, 971 (1999)

    1999

  33. [33]

    Gardiner, P

    C. Gardiner, P. Zoller, and P. Zoller,Quantum noise (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    2004

  34. [34]

    R. L. Stratonovich, On distributions in representation space, SOVIET PHYSICS JETP-USSR4, 891 (1957)

    1957

  35. [35]

    J. C. V´ arilly and J. Gracia-Bond ´ ıa, The moyal represen- tation for spin, Annals of Physics190, 107 (1989)

    1989

  36. [36]

    W. K. Wootters, A Wigner-function formulation of finite- state quantum mechanics, Annals of Physics176, 1 (1987)

    1987

  37. [37]

    Schachenmayer, A

    J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, and A. M. Rey, Many- body quantum spin dynamics with Monte Carlo trajec- tories on a discrete phase space, Phys. Rev. X5, 011022 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    M. J. Steel, M. K. Olsen, L. I. Plimak, P. D. Drummond, S. M. Tan, M. J. Collett, D. F. Walls, and R. Graham, Dynamical quantum noise in trapped Bose-Einstein con- densates, Phys. Rev. A58, 4824 (1998)

    1998

  39. [39]

    Blakie, A

    P. Blakie, A. Bradley, D. M.J., B. R.J., and G. C.W., Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Advances in Physics57, 363 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann. of Physics325, 1790 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    Czischek, M

    S. Czischek, M. G¨ arttner, M. Oberthaler, M. Kastner, and T. Gasenzer, Quenches near criticality of the quan- tum Ising chain—power and limitations of the discrete truncated Wigner approximation, Quantum Science and Technology4, 014006 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    Sundar, K

    B. Sundar, K. C. Wang, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Analy- sis of continuous and discrete Wigner approximations for spin dynamics, Phys. Rev. A99, 043627 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Khasseh, A

    R. Khasseh, A. Russomanno, M. Schmitt, M. Heyl, and R. Fazio, Discrete truncated Wigner approach to dynam- ical phase transitions in Ising models after a quantum quench, Physical Review B102, 014303 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Kunimi, K

    M. Kunimi, K. Nagao, S. Goto, and I. Danshita, Perfor- mance evaluation of the discrete truncated Wigner ap- proximation for quench dynamics of quantum spin sys- tems with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013060 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, and J. Schachenmayer, A generalized phase space approach for solving quantum spin dynamics, New Journal of Physics21, 082001 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Huber, A

    J. Huber, A. M. Rey, and P. Rabl, Realistic simulations of spin squeezing and cooperative coupling effects in large ensembles of interacting two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013716 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Huber, P

    J. Huber, P. Kirton, and P. Rabl, Phase-space methods for simulating the dissipative many-body dynamics of collective spin systems, SciPost Physics10, 045 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    V. P. Singh and H. Weimer, Driven-dissipative critical- ity within the discrete truncated Wigner approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 200602 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    C. D. Mink, D. Petrosyan, and M. Fleischhauer, Hy- brid discrete-continuous truncated Wigner approxima- tion for driven, dissipative spin systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043136 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    C. D. Mink and M. Fleischhauer, Collective radiative in- teractions in the discrete truncated Wigner approxima- tion, SciPost Physics15, 233 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Tebbenjohanns, C

    F. Tebbenjohanns, C. D. Mink, C. Bach, A. Rauschen- beutel, and M. Fleischhauer, Predicting correlations in superradiant emission from a cascaded quantum system, Phys. Rev. A110, 043713 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Spahn, J

    Y. Spahn, J. Hartmann, B. Saalfrank, M. Fleischhauer, T. Halfmann, and T. Peters, Motion-induced direction- ality of collective emission in a non-chiral waveguide (2026), arXiv:2603.03028 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    Hosseinabadi, O

    H. Hosseinabadi, O. Chelpanova, and J. Marino, User- friendly truncated Wigner approximation for dissipative spin dynamics, PRX Quantum6, 030344 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Noelet al., Path integral approach to the trun- cated Wigner approximtion of driven-dissipative spins (in preparation)

    V. Noelet al., Path integral approach to the trun- cated Wigner approximtion of driven-dissipative spins (in preparation)

  56. [56]

    Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermody- namic equilibrium, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermody- namic equilibrium, Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932)

    1932

  57. [57]

    J. E. Moyal, Quantum mechanics as a statistical the- ory, inMath. Proceedings of the Cambridge Phil. Society, Vol. 45 (Cambridge University Press, 1949) pp. 99–124

    1949

  58. [58]

    Schlegel, D

    T. Schlegel, D. Breu, and M. Fleischhauer, Imaginary- time evolution of interacting spin systems in the trun- 25 cated Wigner approximation (2026), arXiv:2603.03950 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    S. A. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 5022 (1997)

    1997

  60. [60]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  61. [61]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports93, 301 (1982)

    1982

  62. [62]

    N. E. Rehler and J. H. Eberly, Superradiance, Phys. Rev. A3, 1735 (1971)

    1971

  63. [63]

    Gross, C

    M. Gross, C. Fabre, P. Pillet, and S. Haroche, Observa- tion of near-infrared Dicke superradiance on cascading transitions in atomic sodium, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 1035 (1976)

    1976

  64. [64]

    Skribanowitz, I

    N. Skribanowitz, I. P. Herman, J. C. MacGillivray, and M. S. Feld, Observation of Dicke superradiance in opti- cally pumped HF gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 309 (1973)

    1973

  65. [65]

    Lehmberg, Radiation from an n-atom system

    R. Lehmberg, Radiation from an n-atom system. i. gen- eral formalism, Physical Review A2, 883 (1970)

    1970

  66. [66]

    Dzsotjan, A

    D. Dzsotjan, A. S. Sørensen, and M. Fleischhauer, Quantum emitters coupled to surface plasmons of a nanowire: A green’s function approach, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 075427 (2010)

    2010

  67. [67]

    Asenjo-Garcia, J

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, J. Hood, D. Chang, and H. Kimble, Atom-light interactions in quasi-one-dimensional nanos- tructures: A green’s-function perspective, Physical Re- view A95, 033818 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    Chang, J

    D. Chang, J. Douglas, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 031002 (2018)

    2018

  69. [69]

    Ferioli, S

    G. Ferioli, S. Pancaldi, A. Glicenstein, D. Cl´ ement, A. Browaeys, and I. Ferrier-Barbut, Non-gaussian cor- relations in the steady state of driven-dissipative clouds of two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 133601 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Calaj´ o and D

    G. Calaj´ o and D. E. Chang, Emergence of solitons from many-body photon bound states in quantum nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023026 (2022)

    2022

  71. [71]

    B. Berg, L. I. Plimak, A. Polkovnikov, M. K. Olsen, M. Fleischhauer, and W. P. Schleich, Commuting heisen- berg operators as the quantum response problem: Time- normal averages in the truncated Wigner representation, Phys. Rev. A80, 033624 (2009)

    2009

  72. [72]

    Hartmann,Truncated Wigner Simulationen von Spin- Systemen, Diploma thesis, TU Kaiserslautern (2024)

    J. Hartmann,Truncated Wigner Simulationen von Spin- Systemen, Diploma thesis, TU Kaiserslautern (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Guardiola-Navarrete, S

    E. Guardiola-Navarrete, S. Cardenas-Lopez, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Phase-space methods for many-body quantum optics, inAdvances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 74 (Elsevier, 2025) pp. 87–156

    2025

  74. [74]

    Shirai and T

    T. Shirai and T. Mori, Out-of-time-order correlator com- putation based on a discrete truncated Wigner approxi- mation, Physical Review B112, 014309 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics5, 965 (1975)

    1975

  76. [76]

    Parisi, Infinite number of order parameters for spin- glasses, Physical Review Letters43, 1754 (1979)

    G. Parisi, Infinite number of order parameters for spin- glasses, Physical Review Letters43, 1754 (1979)

    1979

  77. [77]

    Binder and A

    K. Binder and A. P. Young, Spin glasses: Experimen- tal facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions, Rev. Mod. Phys.58, 801 (1986)

    1986

  78. [78]

    Kirkpatrick, C

    S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt Jr, and M. P. Vecchi, Opti- mization by simulated annealing, science220, 671 (1983)

    1983

  79. [79]

    Du and P

    D. Du and P. M. Pardalos,Handbook of combinatorial optimization, Vol. 4 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1998)

    1998

  80. [80]

    Lucas, Ising formulations of many np problems, Fron- tiers in PhysicsV olume 2 - 2014(2014)

    A. Lucas, Ising formulations of many np problems, Fron- tiers in PhysicsV olume 2 - 2014(2014)

    2014

Showing first 80 references.