Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Universal Dynamic Scaling of 2D Quantum Ising Transition on the Fuzzy Sphere

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A linear quench on the fuzzy-sphere Ising model shows Kibble-Zurek scaling in 2D quantum Ising transition.

desk verdict First real-time quench dynamics on the fuzzy sphere; the KZ scaling for magnetization and correlation holds up, with a minor typo in the initial-time condition and an inherited universality class. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18028 v1 pith:IUQMUDYA submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Meng Zeng , Shuai Yin , Roderich Moessner This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords fuzzysphereKibble-Zurekmechanismfinite-timescaling3DIsinguniversalityclassquantumcriticaldynamicstransverse-fieldmodelreal-timeevolutionconformalfieldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to establish that the fuzzy sphere, a geometric regularization already used for equilibrium conformal field theories, can also capture real-time quantum critical dynamics. By linearly ramping the transverse field of the fuzzy-sphere Ising model to its critical point, the authors find that the squared order parameter and the two-point correlation function collapse onto the finite-time scaling forms set by the 3D Ising universality class, with the thermodynamic-limit magnetization following the Kibble-Zurek power law in quench rate. The excitation energy density, however, does not reach the scaling regime at available system sizes, a failure the authors trace to a symmetry-enforced sparse energy spectrum. A sympathetic reader would care because, if correct, this turns the fuzzy sphere into a quantitative nonequilibrium laboratory for strongly coupled (2+1)-dimensional CFTs that are otherwise out of reach.

What carries the argument

The fuzzy sphere: a spherical geometry with a magnetic monopole placing electrons in the lowest Landau level, with interaction parameters V0=1, V1=4.75 engineered to place the system at the 3D Ising critical point h_c≈3.16. Exact SO(3) rotational symmetry confines the dynamics to a single angular-momentum sector, reducing the effective Hilbert space and enabling long-time tensor-network evolution. Kibble-Zurek scaling relations, expressed through the freeze-out time t̂_v∼v^{-zν/(1+zν)} and length ξ̂_v∼v^{-ν/(1+zν)}, provide the collapse identities for the data.

What would settle it

Carry out the same linear quench on a fuzzy-sphere model with a different interaction parameter set, such as one believed to realize a different conformal field theory, and check whether the same scaling collapse with 3D Ising exponents persists. If it does, the exponents are not discriminating. Alternatively, test the central claim by computing the exponent of the thermodynamic-limit ⟨m_z^2⟩L^2 at larger system sizes (N>36) and comparing it to v^{-2Δν/(1+zν)}; a systematic deviation beyond finite-size corrections would refute the KZ interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the fuzzy-sphere Ising model, when linearly quenched from the paramagnetic phase to the critical point, exhibits finite-time scaling governed by the 3D Ising critical exponents. Specifically, ⟨m_z^2⟩, rescaled by L^2 and extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit, follows the Kibble-Zurek power law v^{-2Δν/(1+zν)}, and the two-point correlation function C(θ) collapses onto a universal curve when coordinate distance is scaled by the freeze-out length ξ̂_v, whose exponential decay yields the non-universal coefficient in ξ̂_v. The paper also shows that the excitation energy Q does not collapse at accessible sizes, attributing this to a sparse spectrum from combined symmet

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the fuzzy-sphere Hamiltonian's critical point with the 3D Ising universality class is inherited from prior equilibrium work and is not re-derived in this paper; if that identification were incorrect, the observed collapses would be accidental.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fuzzy sphere now extends from equilibrium conformal data to universal nonequilibrium critical dynamics.
  • The Kibble-Zurek mechanism is quantitatively verified in a (2+1)-dimensional interacting quantum system without lattice structure.
  • Equal-time correlation functions measured after a quench can be used to estimate non-universal scaling coefficients in the freeze-out length.
  • The method in principle applies to other fuzzy-sphere critical points, including continuous symmetries, topological transitions, and deconfined criticality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry-enforced level sparsity that blocks Q suggests that observables probing the full excitation spectrum will be harder to access on the sphere than local observables; a gentle symmetry-breaking perturbation might restore the Q collapse and test this explanation directly.
  • The measured non-universal coefficient in the freeze-out length (5.6) could serve as a benchmark for comparing real-time dynamics across different fuzzy-sphere CFTs, even though the paper treats it as non-universal.
  • Because the fuzzy sphere preserves exact rotational symmetry, it may be well suited to other driven protocols—periodic driving, sudden quenches, or crossed ramps—where symmetry sectors control the effective Hilbert space and enable longer simulation times.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies real-time quench dynamics of the fuzzy-sphere regularized (2+1)d transverse-field Ising model. A linear ramp h(t)=h_c−vt is performed from the paramagnetic phase to the critical point, and three observables are measured at h_c: the squared order parameter ⟨m_z^2⟩, the excitation energy density Q, and the equal-time two-point correlation C(θ). Using the 3D Ising exponents ν≈0.63, Δ≈0.518, z=1 as fixed inputs from prior equilibrium fuzzy-sphere work, the authors report finite-time scaling collapse for ⟨m_z^2⟩ and C(θ), with infinite-size extrapolation of ⟨m_z^2⟩L^2 consistent with Kibble-Zurek scaling over an intermediate range of quench rates. Q does not collapse at the available sizes, which is attributed to symmetry-enforced level sparsity. Slow- and fast-quench limits are checked by exact diagonalization. The paper also provides benchmark and convergence tests for the TDVP algorithm and makes the code publicly available.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the fuzzy sphere becomes a quantitative nonequilibrium laboratory for (2+1)d CFTs, going beyond equilibrium ground-state studies. The paper has notable strengths: the numerical methodology is carefully benchmarked against ED, convergence in bond dimension and time step is documented, the Q negative result is reported honestly, and the code is released. However, the claim depends on an inherited identification of the fuzzy-sphere model with the 3D Ising universality class, and the evidence for universal scaling is based on system sizes N=8–36. The central dynamic-scaling statements are plausible but need clarification and one or two additional robustness checks before the paper fully supports its title.

major comments (4)
  1. [Numerical results, protocol paragraph] The text states: 'the initial time t_i is chosen with |t_i| < \hat t_v for each quench rate v to ensure that the evolution starts from the adiabatic regime.' This is internally inconsistent. Since t_i is the time at which the ramp starts and \hat t_v is the freeze-out time, adiabatic starting requires |t_i| >> \hat t_v (or at least |t_i| > \hat t_v), not |t_i| < \hat t_v. If the literal inequality were used, the evolution would begin inside the impulse regime, invalidating the KZ interpretation. Please correct the inequality and verify that the code actually starts from the adiabatic regime.
  2. [Eq. (9), Fig. 2(b)] The scaling form ⟨m_z^2⟩ = \hatξ_v^{-2Δ} F_m(L/\hatξ_v) is plausible, but the text should specify the extrapolated quantity and the predicted KZ exponent explicitly. For L >> \hatξ_v, the global magnetization variance is suppressed by the volume, so the scaling function behaves as F_m(x)∼x^{-2}, giving ⟨m_z^2⟩∼L^{-2}\hatξ_v^{2-2Δ}. Thus the finite KZ power law applies to ⟨m_z^2⟩L^2 with exponent (2−2Δ)ν/(1+zν), not to ⟨m_z^2⟩ itself. The current phrasing in the main text and Fig. 2(b) leaves this distinction unclear; please state it and give the explicit exponent used for the dashed guide to the eye.
  3. [Fig. 2(a), Eq. (9)] The collapse uses the equilibrium 3D Ising exponents ν≈0.63, Δ≈0.518, z=1 as fixed inputs inherited from Ref. [44]. Because the paper's central claim is that the fuzzy-sphere dynamics realizes 3D Ising KZ scaling, the authors should demonstrate that the collapse is discriminative at the available sizes N=8–36. A sensitivity test with nearby exponent values (e.g., ν=0.5,0.63 and Δ=0.5,0.54) or a free-exponent fit would address the concern that the visually good collapse could be consistent with a range of exponents on these small systems.
  4. [Fig. 4, Eq. (13)] The two-point correlation function collapse and the fitted coefficient \hatξ_v≈5.6v^{-1/(1+1/ν)} are presented only for N=36. Since Eq. (13) is a scaling form in L and \hatξ_v, a single system size cannot by itself establish the L-dependence of the correlation function. Please provide the same analysis for at least one additional system size, or explain quantitatively why N=36 is sufficient (for example, using the convergence tests in Fig. 9) to support the claimed universal scaling.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Refs. [73] and [75] appear to be the same paper (Liu, Polkovnikov, Sandvik, Phys. Rev. B 89, 054307, 2014); please consolidate to avoid duplicate citation.
  2. [Fig. 2(b) caption] The figure caption should define the error bars and specify the range of 1/L used in the linear extrapolation, as well as the exact functional form of the red dashed line (including the exponent).
  3. [End Matter, Fig. 5/6 captions] The captions of Figs. 5 and 6 are very terse. Please add the parameter definitions (v, L, N) and state what is plotted in each panel.
  4. [Excitation energy density section] The discussion attributes the failure of Q-scaling to 'symmetry-enforced level sparsity' making the effective finite-size gap larger. A one-sentence explanation of why sparsity increases the gap (rather than merely reducing the density of states) would help the reader follow the argument.
  5. [Code availability] The code repository is a welcome part of the paper. Please include a version/commit identifier and the exact parameters used to generate the main figures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No meaningful circularity: dynamical exponents are external inputs, not fitted outputs; self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is a consistency test, not a derivation that returns its own inputs. The fuzzy-sphere Hamiltonian and critical point h_c≈3.16 are taken from the equilibrium work of Ref. [44] (Zhu et al.), which is not by the current authors. The FTS/KZ forms in Eqs. (9), (11), and (13) use the 3D Ising exponents Δ≈0.518, ν≈0.63, z=1 as fixed external inputs; the dynamical data are then collapsed against these fixed exponents and the asymptotic slope is compared with the analytic KZ exponent −2Δν/(1+zν). No exponent is extracted from the quench data, so the collapse is not self-definitional. The only fitted number, the prefactor 5.6 in the freeze-out correlation length, is explicitly non-universal and is not used to infer the critical exponents; fitting a prefactor in a known scaling law is not circular. The paper reports an honest null result for Q (no collapse, attributed to symmetry-enforced level sparsity) and provides ED benchmarks, bond-dimension and time-step convergence tests, and public code, which makes the numerics externally checkable. Several references to coauthor S. Yin appear in contextual review lists, but none is load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely through a self-citation. A protocol sentence says the initial time satisfies |t_i|<t̂_v 'to ensure ... starts from the adiabatic regime'; adiabatic starting would require |t_i|≫t̂_v, an internal inconsistency worth checking in the released code, but this is a correctness/protocol issue, not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is independent of its own outputs; score is 1 only to acknowledge non-load-bearing self-citations, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters except c_ξ are inherited from prior equilibrium fuzzy sphere studies; no new particles or degrees of freedom are introduced. The central claims depend on the validity of the fuzzy sphere Ising identification and on the numerical convergence of TDVP in a symmetry-restricted sector.

free parameters (4)
  • non-universal coefficient c_xi = ≈5.6
    Obtained by fitting the collapsed correlation function C(θ) to e^{-x/5.6} (Fig. 4); enters ξ̂_v ≈ 5.6 v^{-1/(1+1/ν)}. Non-universal prefactor of a standard KZ scale.
  • 3D Ising critical exponents (ν≈0.63, Δ≈0.518, z=1)
    Taken as inputs from prior equilibrium fuzzy sphere work [44], not fitted in this paper; used to construct the scaling collapse in Figs. 2 and 4. Listed for exhaustiveness.
  • critical transverse field h_c = ≈3.16
    Equilibrium critical point quoted from [44]; used as the endpoint of the quench h(t)=h_c - vt.
  • short-distance cutoff a (magnetic length) = ≈1 (≈L/√N)
    Natural physical cutoff of the fuzzy sphere; used to classify the fast-quench regime (ξ̂_v ≲ a). Not fitted, fixed by the geometry.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The LLL-projected fuzzy-sphere Hamiltonian with V0=1, V1=4.75 (all other V_l=0) realizes the 3D Ising CFT at h_c≈3.16.
    Inherited from the equilibrium computation in [44]; the paper's KZ analysis assumes the same transition is crossed during the ramp. Invoked in 'Fuzzy sphere setup and quench protocol'.
  • standard math The KZ/FTS scaling forms for ⟨m_z^2⟩, Q, and C(θ) (Eqs. 9, 11, 13) hold with the equilibrium exponents ν, z, Δ.
    Standard results from KZ theory and finite-time scaling (Refs [5,6,73,74]); the paper tests rather than derives them.
  • standard math The Weyl transformation maps equal-time correlators on the sphere to flat-space ones (Eq. 12), with distance 2L sin(θ/2).
    Cited to [46,48]; used to write the equilibrium form of C(θ).
  • domain assumption The dynamics is confined to the [0,+,+,+] symmetry sector (SO(3) l=0, particle-hole +1, Ising Z2 +1, π-rotation about y).
    Used to justify the reduced Hilbert space and the symmetry-enforced sparsity invoked for Q ('Excitation energy density' and End Matter; Fig. 7).
  • domain assumption TDVP with controlled bond expansion and Dmax=1000 gives converged real-time observables.
    Supported by benchmarks vs ED (Fig. 8) and bond-dimension tests (Fig. 9), but not a rigorous bound.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Dynamic Scaling of 2D Quantum Ising Transition on the Fuzzy Sphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IUQMUDYA

@misc{pith2026260718028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Dynamic Scaling of 2D Quantum Ising Transition on the Fuzzy Sphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IUQMUDYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18028}
}
abstract

We revisit the problem of \textit{real-time} quantum dynamics of the paradigmatic two dimensional transverse-field Ising model using the recently developed fuzzy sphere regularization scheme. By linearly ramping the transverse field from the paramagnetic phase to criticality, we study the finite-time scaling behavior of the squared order parameter $\langle m_z^2 \rangle$, the excitation energy density $Q$, and the two-point correlation function of $m_z$. We establish numerically that, at intermediate quench rate, $\langle m_z^2 \rangle$ follows the conventional Kibble-Zurek prediction set by the critical exponents of the $3$D Ising universality class, and the correlation function exhibits the expected exponential decay whose correlation length can be used to estimate the non-universal scaling coefficient in the freeze-out time/length. In contrast, the excitation energy density $Q$ does not reach the same scaling regime at available system sizes due to large effective finite-size gap from symmetry-enforced level sparsity in the energy spectrum. At slow quench rates the universal quasi-adiabatic scaling for both $\langle m_z^2 \rangle$ and $Q$ is recovered. Since the fuzzy sphere construction can realize not only the Ising conformal field theory (CFT), but a broad family of $(2+1)d$ CFTs, our results establish a route to the real-time critical dynamics of strongly coupled CFTs that are otherwise computationally challenging to study.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18028 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic figures. (a) 2d Ising model on con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Data collapse of ⟨m2 z ⟩ for system sizes rang￾ing from N = 8 to 36. The known critical exponents for the 3D Ising universality class are used for the plots. (b) Extrapolation of ⟨m2 z ⟩L 2 to the thermodynamic limit at each quench rate (black empty circle), with the inset showing the linear extrapolation at five representative quench rates. The red dashed line shows the KZ predic￾tion [75] as a guide to the eye… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Two-point correlation function on the sphere [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fast quench regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Slow quench regime. In particular, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Benchmark of the TDVP results with ED for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Convergence test of all the three observables [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Convergence of ⟨m2 z ⟩ and Q when tuning the time-step δt for time-evolution. Here N = 8 and v = 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 13 linked inside Pith

  1. [44]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.-C. He, Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization, Physical Review X13, 021009 (2023)

    2023

  2. [73]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  3. [75]

    Huang, S

    Y. Huang, S. Yin, B. Feng, and F. Zhong, Kibble-zurek mechanism and finite-time scaling, Phys. Rev. B90, 134108 (2014)

    2014

  4. [1]

    T. W. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1387 (1976)

    1976

  5. [2]

    T. W. Kibble, Some implications of a cosmological phase transition, Physics Reports67, 183 (1980). 6

    1980

  6. [3]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

    1985

  7. [4]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed matter systems, Physics Reports276, 177 (1996)

    1996

  8. [5]

    Zhong and Z

    F. Zhong and Z. Xu, Dynamic monte carlo renormal- ization group determination of critical exponents with linearly changing temperature, Phys. Rev. B71, 132402 (2005)

    2005

Show all 76 references
  1. [6]

    S. Gong, F. Zhong, X. Huang, and S. Fan, Finite-time scaling via linear driving, New Journal of Physics12, 043036 (2010)

    2010

  2. [7]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed in- teracting quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 863 (2011)

    2011

  3. [8]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics59, 1063 (2010)

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances in Physics59, 1063 (2010)

    2010

  4. [9]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a Quantum Phase Transition: Exact Solution of the Quantum Ising Model, Physical Review Letters95, 245701 (2005)

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a Quantum Phase Transition: Exact Solution of the Quantum Ising Model, Physical Review Letters95, 245701 (2005)

    2005

  5. [10]

    W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 105701 (2005)

    2005

  6. [11]

    Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys

    A. Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B72, 161201(R) (2005)

    2005

  7. [12]

    Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 054001 (2018)

    M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 054001 (2018)

    2018

  8. [13]

    Heyl, Scaling and Universality at Dynamical Quan- tum Phase Transitions, Phys

    M. Heyl, Scaling and Universality at Dynamical Quan- tum Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 140602 (2015)

    2015

  9. [14]

    B. Damski, The Simplest Quantum Model Supporting the Kibble-Zurek Mechanism of Topological Defect Pro- duction: Landau-Zener Transitions from a New Perspec- tive, Physical Review Letters95, 035701 (2005)

    2005

  10. [15]

    Grabarits, F

    A. Grabarits, F. Balducci, and A. del Campo, Driving a quantum phase transition at an arbitrary rate: Exact solution of the transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. A 111, 042207 (2025)

    2025

  11. [16]

    Sengupta, D

    K. Sengupta, D. Sen, and S. Mondal, Exact Results for Quench Dynamics and Defect Production in a Two- DimensionalModel,PhysicalReviewLetters100,077204 (2008)

    2008

  12. [17]

    De Grandi, V

    C. De Grandi, V. Gritsev, and A. Polkovnikov, Quench dynamics near a quantum critical point, Physical Review B81, 012303 (2010)

    2010

  13. [18]

    Chandran, A

    A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, and S. L. Sondhi, Kibble-Zurek problem: Universality and the scaling limit, Physical Review B86, 064304 (2012)

    2012

  14. [19]

    Uhlmann, R

    M. Uhlmann, R. Schützhold, and U. R. Fischer, Vor- tex quantum creation and winding number scaling in a quenched spinor bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 120407 (2007)

    2007

  15. [20]

    S. Yin, P. Mai, and F. Zhong, Nonequilibrium quantum criticality in open systems: The dissipation rate as an additional indispensable scaling variable, Phys. Rev. B 89, 094108 (2014)

    2014

  16. [21]

    Kolodrubetz, B

    M. Kolodrubetz, B. K. Clark, and D. A. Huse, Nonequi- librium Dynamic Critical Scaling of the Quantum Ising Chain, Physical Review Letters109, 015701 (2012)

    2012

  17. [22]

    M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135704 (2013)

    2013

  18. [23]

    Heyl, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Sys- tems with Broken-Symmetry Phases, Phys

    M. Heyl, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Sys- tems with Broken-Symmetry Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 205701 (2014)

    2014

  19. [24]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, andM.D.Lukin,QuantumKibble-Zurekmechanismand critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature568, 207 (2019)

    2019

  20. [25]

    Jurcevic, H

    P. Jurcevic, H. Shen, P. Hauke, C. Maier, T. Brydges, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, M. Heyl, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Direct Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 080501 (2017)

    2017

  21. [26]

    B. Dora, M. Heyl, and R. Moessner, The Kibble-Zurek mechanism at exceptional points, Nature Communica- tions10, 2254 (2019)

    2019

  22. [27]

    Yin, G.-Y

    S. Yin, G.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Lo, and P. Chen, Kibble- Zurek Scaling in the Yang-Lee Edge Singularity, Physical Review Letters118, 065701 (2017)

    2017

  23. [28]

    Francuz, J

    A. Francuz, J. Dziarmaga, B. Gardas, and W. H. Zurek, Space and time renormalization in phase transition dy- namics, Phys. Rev. B93, 075134 (2016)

    2016

  24. [29]

    Yin, Finite-time scaling with arbitrary driving rates: Bridging the kibble-zurek and de grandi-gritsev- polkovnikov limits, arXiv:2605.30938 (2026)

    S. Yin, Finite-time scaling with arbitrary driving rates: Bridging the kibble-zurek and de grandi-gritsev- polkovnikov limits, arXiv:2605.30938 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    H.-B. Zeng, C.-Y. Xia, and A. Del Campo, Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches across a Phase Transition, Physical Review Letters130, 060402 (2023)

    2023

  26. [31]

    Roychowdhury, R

    K. Roychowdhury, R. Moessner, and A. Das, Dynamics and correlations at a quantum phase transition beyond Kibble-Zurek, Phys. Rev. B104, 014406 (2021)

    2021

  27. [32]

    M. Deng, S. Yang, C. Sun, F. Li, and X.-J. Yu, Anoma- lous dynamical scaling at topological quantum criticality, arXiv:2512.15537 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Braun, M

    S. Braun, M. Friesdorf, S. S. Hodgman, M. Schreiber, J. P. Ronzheimer, A. Riera, M. del Rey, I. Bloch, J. Eis- ert, and U. Schneider, Emergence of coherence and the dynamics of quantum phase transitions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 3641 (2015)

    2015

  29. [34]

    K. Du, X. Fang, C. Won, C. De, F.-T. Huang, W. Xu, H. You, F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, A. Del Campo, and S.-W. Cheong, Kibble–Zurek mechanism of Ising domains, Na- ture Physics19, 1495 (2023)

    2023

  30. [35]

    De Grandi, A

    C. De Grandi, A. Polkovnikov, and A. W. Sandvik, Uni- versal nonequilibrium quantum dynamics in imaginary time, Phys. Rev. B84, 224303 (2011)

    2011

  31. [36]

    Shu, S.-K

    Y.-R. Shu, S.-K. Jian, A. W. Sandvik, and S. Yin, Equi- libration of topological defects near the deconfined quan- tum multicritical point, Nature Communications16, 3402 (2025)

    2025

  32. [37]

    Weinberg, N

    P. Weinberg, N. Xu, and A. W. Sandvik, Defects and their Time Scales in Quantum and Classical Annealing of the Two-Dimensional Ising Model, arXiv:2507.09273 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  33. [38]

    Y.-K. Yu, Z. Zeng, Y.-R. Shu, Z.-X. Li, and S. Yin, Nonequilibrium Dynamics of Dirac Quantum Criticality in Imaginary Time, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 086502 (2026)

    2026

  34. [39]

    Zeng, Y.-K

    Z. Zeng, Y.-K. Yu, Z.-X. Li, Z.-X. Li, and S. Yin, Finite- time scaling beyond the Kibble-Zurek prerequisite in Dirac systems, Nature Communications16, 6181 (2025)

    2025

  35. [40]

    Shu, Y.-B

    Y.-R. Shu, Y.-B. Li, and S. Yin, Universal short- imaginary-time quantum critical dynamics near bound- 7 aries, arXiv:2607.01076 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  36. [41]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. M. Rams, J. Dziarmaga, M. Heyl, and W. H. Zurek, Quantum phase transition dynamics in the two-dimensional transverse-field Ising model, Science Ad- vances8, eabl6850 (2022)

    2022

  37. [42]

    Schmitt and M

    M. Schmitt and M. Heyl, Quantum Many-Body Dynam- ics in Two Dimensions with Artificial Neural Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 100503 (2020)

    2020

  38. [43]

    V. D. Naik, Z.-H. Sun, and M. Heyl, Real-time Dynamics in 3D for up to 1000 Qubits with Neural Quantum States: Quenches and the Quantum Kibble–Zurek Mechanism, arXiv:2604.05032 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  39. [45]

    He and W

    Y.-C. He and W. Zhu, A Fuzzy Sphere Journey in Crit- ical Phenomena, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics17, 1 (2026)

    2026

  40. [46]

    Zhou, FuzzifiED: Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere, arXiv:2503.00100 (2025)

    Z. Zhou, FuzzifiED: Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere, arXiv:2503.00100 (2025)

    2025

  41. [47]

    Hu, Y.-C

    L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Operator Product Expan- sion Coefficients of the 3D Ising Criticality via Quantum Fuzzy Spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 031601 (2023)

    2023

  42. [48]

    C. Han, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Conformal four- point correlators of the three-dimensional Ising transition via the quantum fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. B108, 235123 (2023)

    2023

  43. [49]

    Hu, Y.-C

    L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Solving conformal defects in 3D conformal field theory using fuzzy sphere regular- ization, Nature Communications15, 3659 (2024)

    2024

  44. [50]

    Zhou and Y

    Z. Zhou and Y. Zou, Studying the 3d Ising surface CFTs on the fuzzy sphere, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15914 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Dedushenko, Ising BCFT from fuzzy hemisphere, arXiv:2407.15948 (2024)

    M. Dedushenko, Ising BCFT from fuzzy hemisphere, arXiv:2407.15948 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Cuomo, Y.-C

    G. Cuomo, Y.-C. He, and Z. Komargodski, Impurities with a cusp: general theory and 3d Ising, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 1 (2024)

    2024

  47. [53]

    L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, EntropicFfunction of three-dimensional Ising conformal field theory via fuzzy sphere regularization, Phys. Rev. B111, 155151 (2025)

    2025

  48. [54]

    C. Han, L. Hu, and W. Zhu, Conformal operator content of the Wilson-Fisher transition on fuzzy sphere bilayers, Physical Review B110, 115113 (2024)

    2024

  49. [55]

    Z. Zhou, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, SO(5) Deconfined Phase Transition under the Fuzzy-Sphere Microscope: Approximate Conformal Symmetry, Pseudo-Criticality, and Operator Spectrum, Physical Review X14, 021044 (2024)

    2024

  50. [56]

    Zhou and Y.-C

    Z. Zhou and Y.-C. He, 3D conformal field theories with Sp(N)global symmetry on a fuzzy sphere, Physical Re- view Letters135, 026504 (2025)

    2025

  51. [57]

    A. Dey, L. Herviou, C. Mudry, S. Rychkov, and A. M. Läuchli, Conformal data for theO(2)Wilson-Fisher CFT in(2 + 1)-dimensional Spacetime from Exact Diagonal- ization and Matrix Product States on the Fuzzy Sphere, arXiv:2604.18705 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Feng and T

    J. Feng and T. Wang, Studying 3DO(N)Surface CFT on the Fuzzy Sphere, arXiv:2604.21091 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  53. [59]

    W. Guo, Z. Zhou, T.-C. Wei, and Y.-C. He, TheO(N) Free-Scalar and Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theories on the Fuzzy Sphere, arXiv:2512.02234 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Z. Zhou, D. Gaiotto, and Y.-C. He, Free Majorana fermion meets gauged Ising conformal field theory on the fuzzy sphere, arXiv:2509.08038 (2025)

    2025

  55. [61]

    Taylor, C

    J. Taylor, C. Voinea, Z. Papić, and R. Fan, Conformal scalar field theory from Ising tricriticality on the fuzzy sphere, Physical Review Letters136, 056503 (2026)

    2026

  56. [62]

    Z. Zhou, C. Wang, and Y.-C. He, Chern-Simons- matter conformal field theory on fuzzy sphere: Confine- ment transition of Kalmeyer-Laughlin chiral spin liquid, arXiv:2507.19580 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Voinea, R

    C. Voinea, R. Fan, N. Regnault, and Z. Papić, Regular- izing 3d conformal field theories via anyons on the fuzzy sphere, Physical Review X15, 031007 (2025)

    2025

  58. [64]

    A. Dey, L. Herviou, C. Mudry, and A. M. Läuchli, Con- formal Data for theO(3)Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theory from Fuzzy Sphere Realization of the Quan- tum Rotor Model, Physical Review Letters136, 206504 (2026)

    2026

  59. [65]

    R. Fan, J. Dong, and A. Vishwanath, Simulating the non-unitary Yang-Lee conformal field theory on the fuzzy sphere, arXiv:2505.06342 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Yang, Y.-G

    S. Yang, Y.-G. Yue, Y. Tang, C. Han, W. Zhu, and Y. Chen, Microscopic study of the three-dimensional Potts phase transition via fuzzy sphere regularization, Physical Review B112, 024436 (2025)

    2025

  61. [67]

    Fremling, C

    M. Fremling, C. Repellin, J.-M. Stéphan, N. Moran, J. Slingerland, and M. Haque, Dynamics and level statis- tics of interacting fermions in the lowest Landau level, New Journal of Physics20, 103036 (2018)

    2018

  62. [68]

    impulse regime

    augmented by controlled bond expansion [69], com- plemented by exact diagonalization (ED) at smaller sys- arXiv:2607.18028v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 20 Jul 2026 2 Figure 1: Schematic figures. (a) 2d Ising model on con- ventional square lattice. (b) Effective Ising model in the Landa...

    2026 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Phys

    J.Haegeman, J.I.Cirac, T.J.Osborne, I.Pižorn, H.Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  64. [70]

    J.-W. Li, A. Gleis, and J. von Delft, Time-Dependent Variational Principle with Controlled Bond Expansion for Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 026401 (2024)

    2024

  65. [71]

    F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Finite-Size Studies of the Incompressible State of the Fractionally Quantized Hall Effect and its Excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 237 (1985)

    1985

  66. [72]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional Quantization of the Hall Effect: A Hierarchy of Incompressible Quantum Fluid States, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  67. [74]

    C.-W. Liu, A. Polkovnikov, and A. W. Sandvik, Dy- namic scaling at classical phase transitions approached through nonequilibrium quenching, Phys. Rev. B89, 054307 (2014)

    2014

  68. [76]

    C.-W. Liu, A. Polkovnikov, and A. W. Sandvik, Dynamic scaling at classical phase transitions approached through nonequilibrium quenching, Physical Review B89, 054307 (2014). 8 END MA TTER Slow and fast quench results using ED The slow quench limit is more challenging for large...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.