Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 1 cited by

A targeted search with LIGO O4a data finds no continuous gravitational waves from the millisecond pulsar J0435+3233; if its spin-down is intrinsic, gravitational waves carry at most 0.5% of the rotational energy loss — the first such limit

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:39 UTC pith:57KYZAE2

load-bearing objection Solid non-detection and upper limits for J0435+3233, but the headline beat of the spin-down limit by >10x is conditional on an external assumption the authors themselves flag.

arxiv 2607.18219 v2 pith:57KYZAE2 submitted 2026-07-20 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Search for continuous gravitational waves from the pulsar J0435+3233

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords continuous gravitational wavesmillisecond pulsarJ0435+3233targeted searchF-statisticspin-down limitellipticityr-mode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper searches for continuous gravitational waves from the millisecond pulsar J0435+3233, whose unusually large spin-down makes it a potentially strong emitter. Using LIGO O4a data and a coherent matched-filter search, it finds no signal. The most stringent 95% upper limit on the wave amplitude is 5.8×10^-27, corresponding to a neutron-star ellipticity below 1.6×10^-8 at an assumed distance of 1.2 kpc. Provided the observed spin-down is entirely intrinsic, gravitational waves would carry at most 0.5% of the rotational energy being lost — the first time any millisecond pulsar has beaten the spin-down limit by more than a factor of ten.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the finding is a non-detection with unusually strong astrophysical consequences. For a signal locked to twice the spin frequency, the search returns 2F ≈ 2.74, consistent with noise, and the narrow-band and r-mode searches show no outlier. Injecting fake signals into the same cleaned data yields a 95% upper limit of h0 = 5.8×10^-27 on the intrinsic strain amplitude; at 1.2 kpc and Izz = 10^38 kg m^2 this corresponds to an ellipticity below 1.6×10^-8. Comparing with the spin-down limit of about 8×10^-26, the upper limit is ≈14 times smaller, meaning gravitational waves would remove at most 0.5% of the observed rotational-energy loss. The authors identify this as the

What carries the argument

The search rests on the multi-detector F-statistic, a maximum-likelihood matched filter for quasi-monochromatic signals whose phase follows a Taylor expansion in gravitational-wave frequency up to fifth order. The parameter space is shrunk by using precisely measured spin, astrometric, and binary orbital parameters, so the targeted f = 2ν search needs a single template; the narrow-band and r-mode searches add grids over frequency and first and second derivatives. The physical yardstick is the spin-down limit, h0^sd — the amplitude gravitational waves would need to carry away all observed rotational energy loss — and the paper also converts strain limits to ellipticity via the standard quadru

Load-bearing premise

The central comparison assumes that the measured spin-down of -4.77×10^-12 Hz/s reflects the star's own rotational slowing, not acceleration from a possible third companion; if most of it is kinematic, the spin-down-limit beat evaporates.

What would settle it

A multi-year timing campaign measuring the orbital-period derivative or the companion's radial acceleration: if it shows that dynamical acceleration from a third body provides most of the observed -4.77×10^-12 Hz/s spin-down, then the spin-down limit shrinks by roughly a factor of 66 and the paper's 'first >10× beat' claim is false, although the h0 and ellipticity upper limits remain valid.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • An ellipticity upper limit of 1.6×10^-8 at 95% confidence excludes all but very small non-axisymmetric deformations of this neutron star.
  • If the spin-down is intrinsic, gravitational waves remove at most 0.5% of the rotational energy loss, so the spin-down torque must be dominated by electromagnetic or particle emission.
  • This is the first millisecond-pulsar targeted search to beat the spin-down limit by more than an order of magnitude, a substantial step beyond earlier ms-pulsar comparisons that reached only roughly the spin-down value.
  • The r-mode upper limits reach the predicted saturation-amplitude scale around 10^-5, making this the most restrictive targeted r-mode search for a known pulsar reported so far.
  • The excluded range of crustal anisotropy, computed as a function of crust-formation spin frequency, tightens constraints on the maximum size of crust-supported mountains in recycled pulsars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a third-body acceleration is confirmed by timing, the intrinsic spin-down could be as small as ~10^-15 Hz/s, shrinking the spin-down limit by about 66× and invalidating the 'first >10× beat' claim; the strain and ellipticity bounds would still stand.
  • The differential-rotation-aware r-mode band construction introduced here could be applied to other fast, high-spin-down pulsars, where conventional r-mode searches may miss the lowest-frequency emission.
  • Coherently including data from the rest of the fourth observing run could push the strain upper limit lower still, providing a direct test of whether the 0.5% energy-fraction bound tightens further.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents a continuous gravitational-wave search for the millisecond pulsar J0435+3233 using LIGO O4a public data from Hanford and Livingston. Three template banks are used: a single-template search at exactly 2ν, a narrow-band search around 2ν with ~4×10^9 templates, and an r-mode band search centered on 4ν/3 with ~10^11 templates. No significant signal is found; the 95% upper limit from the targeted search is h0 = 5.8×10^-27, translating to an ellipticity bound ε < 1.6×10^-8 at d = 1.2 kpc and Izz = 10^38 kg m^2. The narrow-band and r-mode searches yield consistent non-detections. Under the explicit assumption that the observed spin-down is entirely intrinsic, the targeted upper limit is ~14 times below the spin-down limit, implying that gravitational waves carry at most 0.5% of the spin-down power; the authors note that a hierarchical triple companion could invalidate this interpretation.

Significance. The non-detection and the associated upper limits are technically sound and represent a useful addition to the targeted-CW literature. The analysis follows established methods: a coherent F-statistic with an external radio timing model, phase-metric template placement, and injection-based efficiency measurements on real data, with trials factors automatically included in the loudest-event upper limits. The ellipticity bound of <1.6×10^-8 is competitive with the best pulsar ellipticity constraints, and the r-mode amplitude and crustal-anisotropy bounds are also of astrophysical interest. The headline 'first source beaten by over an order of magnitude' is conditional on the observed spin-down being intrinsic; the paper discloses this condition explicitly in the abstract and Section 6. The strain and ellipticity upper limits are independent of that assumption. I regard the central result as reproducible from the description: the public data, the cited timing solution, and the cleaning/injection procedures are described in sufficient detail.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'smaller greater than 1.6×10^-8' is a typo; it should read 'smaller than 1.6×10^-8'. Also, 'constraints' should be 'constrains'.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction (Section 1)] The abstract's 'first source for which the spin-down upper limit is beaten by over an order of magnitude' is ambiguous and appears to conflict with the Introduction, which notes that Crab (0.02) and Vela (0.07) already beat the spin-down limit by more than an order of magnitude. Recommend rephrasing to 'first millisecond pulsar' or 'first source at spin frequency above ~300 Hz' for which this holds, to avoid an apparent overclaim.
  3. [Table 2] The units in the 0.1% metric-mismatch row are formatted inconsistently (e.g., 'Hz/s3' without a superscript, and repeated units in the f^(3) column). Please standardize the table formatting.
  4. [Section 5, first paragraph] The targeted search reports 2F ≈ 2.74 but no p-value or expected background quantile. Although the value is described as consistent with noise, quoting the p-value or the local significance would strengthen the presentation.
  5. [Section 5.1] The text says 'We choose 90% confidence because the estimate of the detection efficiency is more robust than at 95%.' A brief explanation of why (e.g., fewer Monte Carlo injections required, or reduced fluctuations in the efficiency curve) would help the reader assess the trade-off.
  6. [Author list] The author name 'Na W ang' contains an apparent spacing error; it should read 'Na Wang'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the search parameters come from an external radio timing solution and the upper limits are injection-calibrated; the headline energy-budget claim is explicitly conditional on intrinsic spin-down.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The gravitational-wave phase model (f=2ν, frequency derivatives, binary orbital parameters) is taken from the external radio timing solution of Q. Wu et al. (2026), not fitted to LIGO data (Secs. 2 and 4.3). The h0 upper limits are obtained by injection-recovery efficiency simulations in real data (Sec. 5.1), so they are not constructed to match the spin-down limit. The comparison to the spin-down limit uses the standard external formula Eq. (19), and the ellipticity bound uses the standard quadrupole formula Eq. (20) with assumed distance and moment of inertia. The paper explicitly flags the one fragile link: Sec. 6 states that the energy-budget conclusions "assume that the observed spin-down is entirely intrinsic; any contribution from kinematic effects, such as radial acceleration due to a third body, would bias the inferred spin-down limit." This is a stated condition on the headline significance, not a hidden circular step. Self-citations (e.g., Steltner et al. 2022 for glitch removal, Fesik & Papa 2020 and Ming et al. 2025 for r-mode context) are auxiliary methodological references and are not used as a uniqueness theorem or as the source of the target result. No equation reduces by construction to its input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 1 reflects minor self-citation without load-bearing circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central outputs are observational upper limits. No new particles or forces are introduced; the chief external inputs are the radio timing solution, the assumed distance, canonical neutron-star parameters, and literature r-mode model ranges. The most significant untested premise is the intrinsic-spin-down assumption, which the authors flag.

free parameters (4)
  • Source distance d = 1.2 kpc
    Adopted from Wu et al. (2026); enters the ellipticity limit Eq. (20) and the spin-down limit linearly; no uncertainty quoted in this paper.
  • Moment of inertia Izz = 10^38 kg m^2
    Canonical pulsar value used in Eq. (20) and Eq. (19); the ellipticity and spin-down limits scale inversely with Izz.
  • Neutron-star mass/radius for r-mode amplitude = M=1.4 Msun, R=11.7 km (canonical); M=1.17 Msun, R=9.6 km (conservative)
    Chosen from the literature (Owen 2010; Martinez et al. 2015; Bauswein et al. 2019) to convert h0 upper limits to r-mode amplitude α via Eq. (21); results depend on these assumed values.
  • Crustal anisotropy conversion inputs = νK=1200 Hz, m_cr/M=0.01
    Adopted canonical values in Eq. (22) to translate the ellipticity limit into a constraint on ⟨ϕ⟩; Section 5.1.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Gravitational-wave phase follows the radio rotation phase with f=2ν (and derivatives)
    Section 3, Eq. (4); the single-template targeted search assumes exact phase-locking; if differential rotation decouples GW and radio phases, this search loses sensitivity (narrow-band search partially mitigates).
  • domain assumption The Wu et al. (2026) radio timing solution accurately describes the spin and binary orbital phase over the O4a interval
    Table 1 parameters are evolved to τ0 and used for all templates; if the timing model is incomplete, the matched filter SNR and resulting upper limits degrade.
  • domain assumption Observed spin-down is entirely intrinsic for the spin-down-limit comparison
    Stated in the Conclusions: 'We emphasize that the energy-budget considerations assume that the observed spin-down is entirely intrinsic'; any kinematic acceleration from a third body would lower the true spin-down and the h_sd benchmark.
  • standard math Standard F-statistic noise model: 2F follows central chi-squared with 4 dof in stationary Gaussian noise
    Section 4.2; the detection significance and noise histograms (Figs. 3-4) are assessed against this model.
  • domain assumption r-mode frequency model and parameter ranges (κ0, κ2, κ3, νK) from the literature
    Appendix A, Eqs. (A1)-(A8); search band boundaries A_eff∈[1.276,1.567], B∈[0,0.195], νK,min=506 Hz, n≥3 are taken from prior r-mode studies and determine the coverage of the r-mode search.
  • domain assumption Upper-limit injection procedure gives valid confidence statements
    Section 5.1: detection efficiency measured by injecting signals into real data; assumes simulated signals are representative and that data cleaning is correctly re-applied.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16406 in / 19905 out tokens · 155034 ms · 2026-08-01T15:39:07.178079+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We perform a search for continuous gravitational waves from J0435+3233 using LIGO O4a public data. J0435+3233 is unique among millisecond pulsars as it exhibits an exceptionally large spin-down and marks the first pulsar observed to date with a spin-down larger than $10^{-12}$ Hz/s in the sub $10$ ms spin period range, making it a potentially strong source of continuous gravitational waves. We target signals at exactly twice the rotation frequency, a narrow band around this frequency, and also signals corresponding to r-modes. Our results are consistent with a non-detection. Our most stringent upper limit on the intrinsic gravitational wave amplitude at 95\% confidence is $h_0=5.8\times10^{-27}$. With an estimated source distance of 1.2 kpc this upper limit constraints the ellipticity to be smaller greater than $1.6\times10^{-8}$. If the observed spin-down is all intrinsic, this is the first source for which the spin-down upper limit is beaten by over an order of magnitude and the ellipticity is constrained to the physically very interesting range of the low $10^{-8}$ region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18219 by Benjamin Steltner, Brian McGloughlin, Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein, Jianping Yuan, Jing Ming, Kartikey Sharma, Maria Alessandra Papa, Na Wang, Reinhard Prix.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The spin and first spin derivative of Galactic pulsars from the Australia Telescope National Facility cata￾log (R. N. Manchester et al. 2005). The yellow star shows the uniquely large spin-down rate of J0435+3233 among mil￾lisecond pulsars. 3. THE SIGNAL MODEL This search targets quasi-monochromatic continuous gravitational-wave signals as described in P. Jaranowski et al. (1998). The detector response is … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the orbital period of J0435+3233 from Q. Wu et al. (2026) (dashed line and uncertainties). We also mark the T Wu p used by Q. Wu et al. (2026) and given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Histogram of the maximum 2F results per 1-mHz sub-band for the narrow-band search around 2ν. search is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histogram of the maximum 2F results per 10-mHz sub-band with fitted noise model for the r-mode search. The p-value of the most significant result is ≈ 0.10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: , alongside the targeted and narrow-band grav￾itational wave amplitude upper limits from the search. The targeted search upper limit is a factor of ≈ 14 below the spin-down limit at the 95% confidence level. 624.5 625.0 625.5 626.0 626.5 f (Hz) 10 26 10 25 h 9 5 % 0 Band Search Targeted Search h sd 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Upper limits on the gravitational wave ampli￾tude from r-modes in 0.5-Hz bands. Upper limits are not set in bands for which 95% detection efficiency could not be achieved, due to the presence of lines, near 420 Hz, 434 Hz and 480 Hz. spinning at a frequency ν and hosting unstable r-modes, is expected to emit gravitational waves with amplitude (B. J. Owen 2010), h0(f) = G c 5 64π 3 15 √ 10π α(f)f 2ν d MR3J,… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 95% upper limits on the neutron star crustal anisotropy ⟨ϕ⟩. The gray shaded region corresponds to the ⟨ϕ⟩ values that are excluded by this work. For the Crab pulsar, the constraint on the ratio h UL 0 /hsd 0 reaches ≤ 0.8%, implying that at most ∼ 0.0064% of the available spin-down power is emitted in gravitational waves. In absolute terms, however, the el￾lipticity constraint is not as strong, because th… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The f (1) and f (2) parameter space ranges covered in the r-mode search. The shaded regions show the allowed ranges as a function of gravitational wave frequency f. Panel (a) shows the corresponding range in first frequency derivative f (1), while panel (b) shows the range for the second frequency derivative f (2). The red horizontal lines indicate the frequency-independent boundaries given by Eq.s (A5) an… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the triple nature of the PSR J0435+3233 system

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    PSR J0435+3233 is a hierarchical triple: its anomalous spin-down is an acceleration artifact from a ~1.2 M⊙ outer companion on a ~70-year eccentric orbit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

213 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Rotating Stars in Relativity

    Paschalidis, Vasileios and Stergioulas, Nikolaos. Rotating Stars in Relativity. Living Rev. Rel. 2017. doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0008-x. arXiv:1612.03050

  2. [2]

    Abac, A. G. and others. GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run. 2025. arXiv:2508.18082

  3. [3]

    2017 , month = jun, url =

    Prix, Reinhard , title =. 2017 , month = jun, url =

  4. [4]

    Han, J. L. and others. The FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot Survey. VI. The Discovery of 473 New Pulsars*. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2025. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ada3b7. arXiv:2411.15961

  5. [5]

    2010 , month = apr, url =

    Prix, Reinhard , title =. 2010 , month = apr, url =

  6. [6]

    2012 , eprint=

    Using the pulsar timing software package, TEMPO2 , author=. 2012 , eprint=

  7. [7]

    and Papa, Maria Alessandra and Schutz, Bernard F

    Krishnan, Badri and Sintes, Alicia M. and Papa, Maria Alessandra and Schutz, Bernard F. and Frasca, Sergio and Palomba, Cristiano. The Hough transform search for continuous gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.082001. arXiv:gr-qc/0407001

  8. [8]

    Searches for continuous-wave gravitational radiation

    Riles, Keith. Searches for continuous-wave gravitational radiation. Living Rev. Rel. 2023. doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00044-3. arXiv:2206.06447

  9. [9]

    On the Initial Spin Period Distribution of Neutron Stars

    Du, Shen-Shi and Liu, Xiao-Jin and Chen, Zu-Cheng and You, Zhi-Qiang and Zhu, Xing-Jiang and Zhu, Zong-Hong. On the Initial Spin Period Distribution of Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4450. arXiv:2402.14030

  10. [10]

    Continuous Gravitational Waves from Galactic Neutron Stars: Demography, Detectability, and Prospects

    Pagliaro, Gianluca and Papa, Maria Alessandra and Ming, Jing and Lian, Jianhui and Tsuna, Daichi and Maraston, Claudia and Thomas, Daniel. Continuous Gravitational Waves from Galactic Neutron Stars: Demography, Detectability, and Prospects. Astrophys. J. 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd76f. arXiv:2303.04714

  11. [11]

    Birth and evolution of isolated radio pulsars

    Faucher-Giguere, Claude-Andre and Kaspi, Victoria M. Birth and evolution of isolated radio pulsars. Astrophys. J. 2006. doi:10.1086/501516. arXiv:astro-ph/0512585

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Initial spin periods of neutron stars in supernova remnants. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1100-z , archivePrefix =. 1204.0632 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    D. A. Green , title =. doi:10.1007/s12036-019-9601-6 , url =

  14. [14]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

    Searching for gravitational waves from Cassiopeia A with LIGO. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/23/235011 , archivePrefix =. 0802.3332 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Martins, Jasper and Papa, Maria Alessandra and Steltner, Benjamin and Prix, Reinhard and Vidal, P. B. A Bayesian Framework to Follow-up Continuous Gravitational Wave Candidates from Deep Surveys. 2025. arXiv:2508.18204

  16. [16]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    High-frequency continuous gravitational waves searched in LIGO O3 public data with Einstein@Home. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20073 , archivePrefix =. 2508.20073 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Einstein@Home all-sky ``bucket'' search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO O3 public data. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.16423 , archivePrefix =. 2508.16423 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c. arXiv:1710.05834

  19. [19]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9. arXiv:1710.05833

  20. [20]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. arXiv:1710.05832

  21. [21]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122003. arXiv:1602.03839

  22. [22]

    Harnessing the potential of pystoch: Detecting continuous gravitational waves from interesting supernova remnant targets , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/xydb-k4vw , url =

  23. [23]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Optical and infrared observations of the X-ray source 1WGA J1713.4-3949 in the G347.3-0.5 SNR. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079076 , adsurl =

  24. [24]

    , eprint =

    XMM-Newton observations of the supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946 and its central source. , eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041154 , adsurl =

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Is RX J1713.7-3946 the remnant of the AD393 guest star?. , keywords =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    The SN 393-SNR RX J1713.7-3946 (G347.3-0.5) Connection. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/27 , archivePrefix =. 1112.0593 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    Calibration uncertainty for Advanced LIGO's first and second observing runs , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.102001 , url =

  28. [28]

    Clark, C. J. and others. The TRAPUM L-band survey for pulsars in Fermi-LAT gamma-ray sources. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2023. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3742. arXiv:2212.08528

  29. [29]

    Opportunistic Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Compact Objects in Long-period Binaries

    Singh, Avneet and Papa, Maria Alessandra. Opportunistic Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Compact Objects in Long-period Binaries. Astrophys. J. 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaf80. arXiv:2208.14117

  30. [30]

    and others

    Nieder, L. and others. Discovery of a Gamma-ray Black Widow Pulsar by GPU-accelerated Einstein@Home. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbc02. arXiv:2009.01513

  31. [31]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Setting upper limits on the strength of periodic gravitational waves from PSR J1939+2134 using the first science data from the GEO 600 and LIGO detectors. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.082004 , url =

  32. [32]

    Clark, C. J. and others. Einstein@Home Searches for Gamma-Ray Pulsars in the Inner Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0b5c. arXiv:2509.21307

  33. [33]

    Universe , keywords =

    Pulsar Glitches: A Review. Universe , keywords =. doi:10.3390/universe8120641 , archivePrefix =. 2211.13885 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Detection of 107 glitches in 36 southern pulsars. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts366 , archivePrefix =. 1211.2035 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    Science , keywords =

    A Radio Pulsar Spinning at 716 Hz. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1123430 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0601337 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    Johnson-McDaniel and B.J

    N.K. Johnson-McDaniel and B.J. Owen , title= ". Phys. Rev. D , volume=. 2013

  37. [37]

    and Zdunik, J

    Haensel, P. and Zdunik, J. L. and Bejger, M. and Lattimer, J. M. Keplerian frequency of uniformly rotating neutron stars and strange stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2009. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811605. arXiv:0901.1268

  38. [38]

    Effective mass of free neutrons in neutron star crust

    Chamel, Nicolas. Effective mass of free neutrons in neutron star crust. Nucl. Phys. A. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.010. arXiv:nucl-th/0512034

  39. [39]

    Pethick, C. J. and Zhang, Zhaowen and Kobyakov, D. N. Elastic properties of phases with nonspherical nuclei in dense matter. Phys. Rev. C. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.055802. arXiv:2003.13430

  40. [40]

    Journal of Applied Physics , keywords =

    Averaging of elastic constants for polycrystals. Journal of Applied Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.4993443 , archivePrefix =. 1706.07132 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    Caplan, M. E. and Schneider, A. S. and Horowitz, C. J. Elasticity of Nuclear Pasta. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.132701. arXiv:1807.02557

  42. [42]

    Baiko, D. A. and Chugunov, A. I. Breaking properties of neutron star crust. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2259. arXiv:1808.06415

  43. [43]

    and Woosley, S

    Heger, A. and Woosley, S. E. and Langer, N. and Spruit, H. C. Presupernova evolution of rotating massive stars and the rotation rate of pulsars. IAU Symp. 2004. arXiv:astro-ph/0301374

  44. [44]

    and Burrows, Adam and Thompson, Todd A

    Ott, Christian D. and Burrows, Adam and Thompson, Todd A. and Livne, Eli and Walder, Rolf. The spin periods and rotational profiles of neutron stars at birth. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2006. doi:10.1086/500832. arXiv:astro-ph/0508462

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    The protomagnetar model for gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18280.x , archivePrefix =. 1012.0001 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    Hidden Markov model tracking of continuous gravitational waves from young supernova remnants , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043013 , url =

  47. [47]

    Deep search of the full O3 LIGO data for continuous gravitational waves from the Cassiopeia A central compact object , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.042006 , url =

  48. [48]

    and Szedenits, E

    Zimmermann, M. and Szedenits, E. GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ROTATING AND PRECESSING RIGID BODIES: SIMPLE MODELS AND APPLICATIONS TO PULSARS. Phys. Rev. D. 1979. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20.351

  49. [49]

    Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo

    Abbott, Rich and others. Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. SoftwareX. 2021

  50. [50]

    Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO , volume=

    Abbott, Rich and others. Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher=. 2023 , month=jul, pages=. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acdc9f , number=

  51. [51]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Limits on Gravitational-Wave Emission from Selected Pulsars Using LIGO Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.181103 , url =

  52. [52]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Upper limits on gravitational wave emission from 78 radio pulsars. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.042001 , url =

  53. [53]

    ApJ", title =

    B. P. Abbott and others , journal = "ApJ", title = ". 2008

  54. [54]

    Abadie and others , collaboration =

    J. Abadie and others , collaboration =. Search for gravitational waves associated with the August 2006 timing glitch of the Vela pulsar. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.042001 , url =

  55. [55]

    Abadie and others

    J. Abadie and others. Beating the Spin-down Limit on Gravitational Wave Emission from the Vela Pulsar. ApJ. 2011

  56. [56]

    Aasi and others

    J. Aasi and others. Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars: Results from the Initial Detector Era. ApJ. 2014

  57. [57]

    Aasi and others , collaboration =

    J. Aasi and others , collaboration =. Narrow-band search of continuous gravitational-wave signals from Crab and Vela pulsars in Virgo VSR4 data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.022004 , url =

  58. [58]

    ApJ", title =

    B. P. Abbott and others , journal = "ApJ", title = ". 2017

  59. [59]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. First narrow-band search for continuous gravitational waves from known pulsars in advanced detector data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.122006 , url =

  60. [60]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. First Search for Nontensorial Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.031104 , url =

  61. [61]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Narrow-band search for gravitational waves from known pulsars using the second LIGO observing run. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.122002 , url =

  62. [62]

    ApJ", title =

    B. P. Abbott and others , journal = "ApJ", title = ". 2019

  63. [63]

    and others

    Abbott, R. and others. Narrowband Searches for Continuous and Long-duration Transient Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars in the LIGO-Virgo Third Observing Run. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ad0. arXiv:2112.10990

  64. [64]

    and others , collaboration =

    Abbott, R. and others , collaboration =. Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from 20 accreting Millisecond X-ray Pulsars in O3 LIGO data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.022002 , url =

  65. [65]

    and Caride, Santiago and Inta, Ra

    Rajbhandari, Binod and Owen, Benjamin J. and Caride, Santiago and Inta, Ra. First searches for gravitational waves from r-modes of the Crab pulsar. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.122008. arXiv:2101.00714

  66. [66]

    and Lindblom, Lee and Pinheiro, Luciano Soares and Rajbhandari, Binod

    Owen, Benjamin J. and Lindblom, Lee and Pinheiro, Luciano Soares and Rajbhandari, Binod. Improved Upper Limits on Gravitational-wave Emission from NS 1987A in SNR 1987A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2263. arXiv:2310.19964

  67. [67]

    Search for continuous gravitational wave signals from luminous dark photon superradiance clouds with LVK O3 observations

    Mirasola, Lorenzo and others. Search for continuous gravitational wave signals from luminous dark photon superradiance clouds with LVK O3 observations. 2025. arXiv:2501.02052

  68. [68]

    Ashok and B

    A. Ashok and B. Beheshtipour and M. A. Papa and P. C. C. Freire and B. Steltner and B. Machenschalk and O. Behnke and B. Allen and R. Prix , title =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2582 , url =

  69. [69]

    New semicoherent targeted search for continuous gravitational waves from pulsars in binary systems

    Mirasola, Lorenzo and others. New semicoherent targeted search for continuous gravitational waves from pulsars in binary systems. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123043. arXiv:2404.03721

  70. [70]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Einstein@Home search for periodic gravitational waves in LIGO S4 data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.022001 , url =

  71. [71]

    Abadie and others , collaboration =

    J. Abadie and others , collaboration =. All-sky search for periodic gravitational waves in the full S5 LIGO data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.022001 , url =

  72. [72]

    Aasi and others , collaboration =

    J. Aasi and others , collaboration =. Einstein@Home all-sky search for periodic gravitational waves in LIGO S5 data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.042001 , url =

  73. [73]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Comprehensive all-sky search for periodic gravitational waves in the sixth science run LIGO data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.042002 , url =

  74. [74]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. All-sky search for periodic gravitational waves in the O1 LIGO data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.062002 , url =

  75. [75]

    B. P. Abbott and others , collaboration =. Full band all-sky search for periodic gravitational waves in the O1 LIGO data. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.102003 , url =

  76. [76]

    2024 , eprint=

    Search for continuous gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars in binary systems with long orbital periods in O3 data , author=. 2024 , eprint=

  77. [77]

    Dergachev and M.A

    V. Dergachev and M.A. Papa , journal =. Results from the First All-Sky Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Small-Ellipticity Sources. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.171101 , url =

  78. [78]

    Search for continuous gravitational waves from small-ellipticity sources at low frequencies , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043003 , url =

  79. [79]

    Early release of low-frequency atlas of continuous gravitational waves

    Dergachev, Vladimir and Papa, Maria Alessandra. Early release of low-frequency atlas of continuous gravitational waves. 2025. arXiv:2507.12161

  80. [80]

    P. B. Covas and M. A. Papa and R. Prix and B. J. Owen , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac62d7 , url =

Showing first 80 references.