Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Flavour physics may not need flavour symmetries: predictive TeV-scale models can work with no explicit symmetry at all.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:34 UTC pith:F7ROKGLF

load-bearing objection Chapter 3 is a careful, useful CLFV analysis; the 'swampland' framing is internally inconsistent because the flagship textures are approximate-A4 models. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18382 v1 pith:F7ROKGLF submitted 2026-07-20 hep-ph

Towards the Swampland of Flavour Symmetries

classification hep-ph
keywords flavour symmetriesswampland of flavour symmetriestype II seesawneutrino texture zeroscharged lepton flavour violationSO(10) unificationleptoquarksneutrino condensate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The thesis argues that flavour models can be predictive and testable even when no flavour symmetry is explicitly present, calling this class the 'swampland of flavour symmetries'. The central demonstration is in the lepton sector: in the type II seesaw model, certain two-zero textures of the neutrino mass matrix cancel the tree-level µ→e amplitude and suppress the one-loop dipole, allowing an effective cutoff as low as 5–6 TeV — a scale previously thought to require symmetry protection. Two further examples show that flavour parameters can be calculable without manifest symmetries: the most minimal SO(10) theory with TeV-scale scalar leptoquarks predicts the b−τ mass ratio, and an enhanced B−L symmetry together with a gravity-induced neutrino condensate makes neutrino masses dynamical rather than free. The thesis also computes an overlooked two-loop axion contribution to b→s transitions, relevant to the Belle II excess. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim as: explicit flavour symmetries are sufficient but not necessary for solving the flavour puzzle.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that 'the flavour theories without explicit flavour symmetries ... should also be considered seriously' (Sec. 2.4), and that this class contains concrete, tested models. In the minimal type II seesaw model, the two-zero textures B2 and B3 of the Yukawa coupling Y∆ suppress the tightly constrained µ→e transition rates sufficiently to allow a 5–6 TeV effective cutoff even though SU(2)ℓ, U(1)e, and A4 symmetries are all strongly broken. In the most minimal SO(10) theory, TeV-scale scalar leptoquarks motivated by B anomalies shift the RG running of bottom and tau Yukawa couplings so that the low-energy b−τ mass ratio agrees with experiment, even though

What carries the argument

The central organizing object is the 'swampland of flavour symmetries': the class of theories whose symmetry-breaking spurions are all O(1), so no explicit flavour symmetry survives at low energies. Within that class, the load-bearing mechanisms are (i) two-zero textures of the neutrino mass matrix Y∆, which cancel tree-level µ→e amplitudes and suppress the one-loop dipole by making certain entries of Y∆Y∆† small; (ii) renormalization-group running toward infrared fixed points, which reshapes the SO(10) boundary condition for bottom and tau masses into the measured low-energy ratio; (iii) a gravity-induced neutrino condensate that dynamically generates neutrino masses from a chiral-symmetric

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a gravity-induced neutrino condensate exists and breaks chiral symmetry in the gaugeless Standard Model, generating neutrino masses; this is invoked from earlier work rather than derived here, and the claim that neutrino masses are calculable depends on it.

What would settle it

Measure the branching ratios of τ→µee and τ→eeµ at Belle II sensitivity: the allowed two-zero textures predict τ→µee with two same-sign electrons to be the only observable τ flavour-violating mode, so a confirmed observation of τ→eeµ (opposite-sign electrons) would falsify the texture programme. Alternatively, a precise measurement of BR(µ→eγ) and BR(µ→eee) at MEG II and Mu3e that is inconsistent with the predicted B2/B3 correlations would exclude those textures; a null search for the predicted light B−L gauge boson with its expected couplings would weaken the enhanced B−L scenario.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Two-zero textures B2 and B3 allow a 5–6 TeV type II seesaw with sizable Y∆µτ, a scale comparable to symmetry-protected U(2)^5 models and far below the O(100) TeV required by anarchic flavour structure.
  • Under these textures, τ→µee with two same-sign electrons becomes the distinctive, dominant τ flavour-violating decay; observing any other τ CLFV mode would exclude all considered textures.
  • Minimal SO(10) with TeV-scale scalar leptoquarks can simultaneously address the B anomalies and predict the b−τ mass ratio consistently with measurements, even though SO(10) is not manifest at low energies.
  • The enhanced B−L symmetry framework makes neutrino masses calculable: if the gravity-induced condensate exists, neutrino masses are dynamical rather than free parameters, and a gauged enhanced B−L yields distinctive signals in neutrino experiments.
  • The two-loop axion contribution to b→s transitions modifies the interpretation of the Belle II B→K+invisible excess, showing that light flavourful new particles can also belong to the swampland of flavour symmetries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the swampland programme is correct, the practical criterion for a 'predictive flavour model' shifts from symmetry selection to the existence of any mechanism — algebraic, dynamical, or accidental — that suppresses dangerous transitions; explicit symmetries are sufficient but not necessary.
  • The sharp texture correlations give a discriminating experimental target: measuring several charged-lepton flavour-violating rates simultaneously, especially τ→µee versus µ→eγ and µ→eee, could distinguish two-zero textures from both anarchic and U(2)^5 structures at near-future experiments.
  • The gravitational neutrino-condensate assumption implies a non-perturbative chiral phase transition in the gaugeless Standard Model; this is testable in principle by non-perturbative studies of a chiral fermion theory coupled to gravity-like interactions, since the mechanism predicts spontaneous breaking of the U(48) flavour group.
  • The SO(10) example suggests a general model-building strategy: heavy states inside GUT multiplets can act as the agents that erase the symmetry's low-energy imprint, and existing B-anomaly indications select the TeV scale; confirming leptoquarks at colliders would thereby connect flavour predictions to direct searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The thesis introduces the notion of a 'swampland of flavour symmetries': theories in which flavour symmetries are strongly broken or implicit can nevertheless be predictive. Chapter 3 argues that certain two-zero textures in the type II seesaw model suppress μ→e transitions and allow a 5–6 TeV effective scale without explicit symmetry protection. Chapter 4 presents two 'emerging flavour texture' mechanisms: TeV-scale scalar leptoquarks in minimal SO(10) that correct the b–τ mass ratio, and a gravity-induced neutrino condensate under an 'enhanced B−L' symmetry that makes neutrino masses calculable. Chapter 5 computes an overlooked two-loop axion contribution to b→s a and applies it to the Belle II B→K+invisible excess. The individual calculations are often careful, but the central taxonomy claim is undermined by the very examples chosen to demonstrate it.

Significance. If the thesis's central claim were correct, it would open a new model-building direction: TeV-scale flavour physics without exact symmetry protection, with fermion parameters emerging from RG dynamics or non-perturbative effects. The reported calculations have genuine strengths: Chapter 3 contains a full one-loop matching including the penguin log (Eqs. 3.19–3.22), an RG-stability analysis of the textures (Eq. 3.17, Fig. 3.5), a 10^4-point scan over neutrino parameters with 3σ uncertainties (Table 3.2), and distinctive predictions for τ CLFV and Δ^{++} decays. Chapter 4's SO(10) RG analysis is similarly careful, and Chapter 5 presents a non-trivial two-loop computation. These strengths, however, do not rescue the core thesis: the flagship texture example belongs, by the thesis's own definition, in the landscape of an approximate A4 symmetry rather than in the swampland, and the neutrino-condensate mechanism is imported from prior work rather than derived or independently substantiated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.4, Eq. (2.101); §3.1, Eq. (3.11); §3.2] The taxonomy in Eq. (2.101) places a theory in the swampland of G only if some G-breaking spurion has ε_i^G ≳ 1. For the B2/B3 textures in Eq. (3.11), the A4-breaking entries are Y_Δμμ = 0.31 and Y_Δeτ = 0.07 (relative to Y_Δμτ = 1), both well below unity. By the thesis's own definition these textures lie in the A4 landscape, not in its swampland. The unconditional statement in §3.1 that 'the type II seesaw model with two zero entries ... lies in the swampland of G' is therefore false for A4, and the abstract's claim that the relevant flavour symmetries are 'all strongly broken' is unsupported. The μ→e suppression is inherited from a mildly broken A4 symmetry, not from the absence of symmetries. This is not a cosmetic issue: it invalidates the flagship demonstration of 'flavour theories without explicit flavour symmetries'.
  2. [§4.2] The claim that neutrino masses are 'not free parameters but arise solely through dynamical symmetry breaking effects' rests entirely on the gravity-induced neutrino condensate. The thesis cites this mechanism from the author's previous works (Refs. [293,294]) without deriving it or providing an independent check. The enhanced B−L charge assignment in Table 4.3 does not by itself generate the mass; the condensate is the load-bearing ingredient. If this non-perturbative effect does not exist or is weaker than assumed, the entire 'calculable neutrino mass' pillar collapses. In a manuscript whose stated purpose is to establish the predictive power of the flavour swampland, a mechanism of this centrality cannot be left as an external citation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] The sentence listing the four parameters determining Y_Δ reads 'θ13, θ12, θ12, δ'; the second θ12 should be θ23.
  2. [§2.3 / §3.1] The symbols Λ[12] and Λ[23] are used for deconstruction cut-off scales in Sec. 2.3 and again for quartic couplings in Eq. (3.3). Rename one set to avoid confusion.
  3. [Eq. (2.101)] The threshold '≳ 1' is never made quantitative. Since the classification of the central example depends on this threshold, a precise statement of what counts as 'strongly broken' is essential.
  4. [Throughout] Typos: 'loosing' for 'losing', 'An representativ e' for 'A representative', and in Fig. 3.2's caption 'separated a the dashed line' should read 'separated by the dashed line'. The gray/white legend in Fig. 3.2 should be clarified.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

One load-bearing self-citation (gravity-induced neutrino condensate); otherwise the derivation chain is independent.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sec. 4.2 (intro); Refs. [293,294]]
    "we revisit a non-perturbative effect induced by gravity, known as neutrino condensate, which generates effective neutrino masses in the infrared limit ... Section 4.2 is based on Ref. [293, 294] and our recent developments in Ref. [295]. In subsection 4.2.1, we introduce the non-perturbative gravity induced chiral symmetry breaking mechanism established in Ref. [294]."

    The advertised 'first-principles' result — that neutrino masses are not free parameters but arise solely through dynamical symmetry breaking — depends entirely on the existence of the gravity-induced neutrino condensate. That existence is not derived in this thesis; it is imported from the author's own prior works (Refs. [293,294], listed in the Publications section). The assumption of a non-vanishing vacuum topological susceptibility is precisely the input needed to obtain neutrino masses, so the 'calculation' of calculable neutrino masses reduces to a premise supplied by self-citation. If the condensate or the enhanced B−L anomaly-free assignment fails, this entire pillar collapses. Other chapters, especially Ch. 3 and the SO(10) analysis of Sec. 4.1, are independent of this step.

full rationale

Most of the technical content is self-contained against external data. In Ch. 3, the two-zero textures are inputs from neutrino-oscillation fits; the CLFV branching-ratio predictions (Figs. 3.3–3.5) are outputs computed from the model and are falsifiable, not fitted to the CLFV targets. The SO(10) b−τ analysis is an RG calculation with the TeV-LQ spectrum motivated by B anomalies, not by the b−τ result itself. The only clearly load-bearing self-citation is the gravity-induced neutrino condensate of Sec. 4.2: the thesis does not derive the condensate but imports it from the author's own Refs. [293,294], and the claim that neutrino masses are calculable collapses if that non-perturbative effect is absent. I also note, as a correctness/classification concern rather than a circularity, that the Ch. 3 flagship B2/B3 textures have A4-breaking entries of order 0.07–0.31 and are described by the thesis itself as 'relatively close to the boundary' of the A4 landscape, which complicates the claim that they demonstrate the 'swampland of flavour symmetries.' This does not reduce any derived prediction to an input, so it does not raise the circularity score further.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The thesis's predictive claims rest on imposed textures and scales rather than on derived parameters: the discrete texture choice, Y_Δμτ, m_Δ, Λ_UV, and the TeV LQ spectrum are inputs, and the neutrino-condensate pillar adds a new dynamical effect plus a new symmetry. This is typical of the model-building genre but caps the depth of the 'predictions'.

free parameters (5)
  • Two-zero texture pattern of Y_Δ = 7 allowed patterns (A1, A2, B1–B4, C)
    The vanishing entries of the neutrino mass matrix/Y_Δ are imposed as inputs, selected for compatibility with neutrino oscillation data; the pattern choice controls all CLFV predictions (Sec. 3.1).
  • Y_Δμτ (overall Yukawa scale) = O(0.1–0.5); quoted via Λ_Δ = m_Δ/(2|Y_Δμτ|)
    Sets the absolute CLFV rates; experimental limits are converted into lower bounds on Λ_Δ (Table 3.2).
  • m_Δ (triplet scalar mass) = 3 TeV benchmark (1–10 TeV numerically insensitive)
    The seesaw scale; the loop function in Eq. (3.22) barely varies over this range.
  • Λ_UV (scale at which textures are exact) = scanned up to ~10^4 × m_Δ
    RG corrections destabilize B2/B3 for large Λ_UV (Fig. 3.5), so this scale is a load-bearing input, not derived.
  • TeV-scale LQ mass spectrum from ϕ_126 = 1–50 TeV; TeV-scale positioning motivated by B anomalies
    The b−τ prediction depends on which LQ components (S3, S1, R2, eR2, ...) are light and their mass splittings (Sec. 4.1.2–4.1.3); scanning this spectrum positions the output.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The two-zero textures are imposed at a UV scale Λ_UV; they are not inferred from data and not symmetry-protected.
    Sec. 3.1: 'The flavor texture of the neutrino mass matrix M_ν and the directly aligned Yukawa coupling matrix Y_Δ cannot be fully inferred from the current data.' The entire CLFV analysis proceeds from this imposed structure.
  • domain assumption The L-conserving limit μ_Δ → 0 holds, suppressing tree-level lepton-number-violating operators.
    Sec. 3.2: 'We take the L-conserving limit through this section'; only then do tree-level CLFV amplitudes vanish and the one-loop operators become leading.
  • domain assumption Gravity induces a non-perturbative chiral condensate (neutrino condensate) in the gaugeless SM limit.
    Abstract / Sec. 4.2.1: 'we revisit a non-perturbative effect induced by gravity, known as neutrino condensate'; its existence is assumed from cited prior work (Refs. [293,294]) and is load-bearing for 'neutrino masses are not free parameters but arise solely through the dynamical symmetry breaking effects'.
  • domain assumption The B-anomaly deviations from the SM arise from TeV-scale scalar leptoquarks contained in ϕ_126.
    Sec. 4.1.2: 'the existence of scalar LQs becomes no longer a prior assumption, but a requirement for restoring SO(10)' — the TeV LQ scale is motivated by the anomalies, not derived from first principles.
  • standard math Standard EFT and RG methods (SMEFT/νSMEFT operator counting, one-loop matching, RGEs).
    Used throughout Chapters 2–3 (MFV/U(2) counting, Table 2.2, Eqs. 3.12–3.17); uncontested technical background.
invented entities (2)
  • Enhanced B−L chiral symmetry independent evidence
    purpose: A new class of exact anomaly-free chiral symmetries (SM + three right-handed neutrinos) under which all neutrinos are chiral and massless; neutrino masses arise only from the condensate; if gauged, a Z' couples differently from canonical B−L.
    Abstract: 'Notably, in the neutrino sector, the enhanced B−L symmetry differs from the canonical one. If gauged, it can lead to distinctive signals in the neutrino experiments.' A falsifiable handle (Z' searches, neutrino observables) exists, though the symmetry itself is introduced within this programme.
  • Neutrino condensate (gravitationally induced) independent evidence
    purpose: Non-perturbative dynamical symmetry breaking that generates effective neutrino masses in the infrared, replacing free neutrino-mass parameters.
    The condensate predicts tree-level massless neutrinos plus dynamically generated masses and has indirect handles via B−L gauge signals; however its existence is inherited from cited non-perturbative gravity work, so the independent evidence is indirect.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 61217 in / 22897 out tokens · 202840 ms · 2026-08-01T15:34:48.797948+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this thesis, we demonstrate the predictive power of the flavour models without explicit flavour symmetries, which we call the `swampland of flavour symmetries'. Firstly, we revisit the minimal type II seesaw model, which extends the Standard Model (SM) with a TeV-scale triplet scalar field. We find that certain flavour textures of the neutrino mass matrix can suppress the tightly constrained $\mu\to e$ transition rates and allow a $5-6$ TeV effective cut-off scale, even when the relevant flavour symmetries are all strongly broken. Next, we show two examples in which some SM flavour parameters are calculable, but the underlying symmetries remain implicit. (i) In the most minimal $SO(10)$ theory, although the quark-lepton symmetry does not manifest at low energies, we find that the $b-\tau$ mass ratio can be correctly predicted when the leptoquarks contained in the scalar sector lie at TeV scale, as motivated by the long-standing $B$ anomalies. (ii) We identify a new class of anomaly-free chiral symmetries in the SM (including three right-handed neutrinos), referred to as enhanced $B-L$, under which all neutrinos are massless. In this framework, the neutrino masses are not free parameters but arise solely through the dynamical symmetry breaking effects, known as neutrino condensate. Furthermore, we note that the swampland of flavour symmetries could also involve light new particles, in particular the flavourful axions. As a preliminary study, we calculate an overlooked two-loop contribution to the axion flavour violating interactions in a minimal axion model, and analyze its impact on explaining a recent excess at Belle II.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18382 by Xiyuan Gao.

Figure 5.15
Figure 5.15. Figure 5.15: Bounds on the coefficients Ci of dimension-six operators constrained by selected 2 Figure 2.1: Bounds on the cut-off scales of the dimension-six operators inducing certain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: The moose diagram generating the (1, 1) entry of the SM charged lepton mass matrix in a model with multiple vector-like fermions. is controlled by the pattern of µIJ , commonly referred to as the ‘moose diagrams’. Here, we show the moose diagram contributing to the (1, 1) entry of the charge lepton mass matrix in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: The chain structure of model generating the up-type quark (left panel) and down [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: A schematic illustration of the space of the theories lying in the landscape and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_2_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: (a)-(e): Feynman diagrams contributing to CLFV processes within the full type II [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Representative textures for the theories lying in the landscape and the swampland [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Predicted branching ratios of various CLFV processes for textures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: Ratios of CLFV BRs as functions of the scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_3_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: RG evolution of the third-generation charged fermions masses from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: A schematic illustration on at low energy stability of the flavour conserving limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Feynman diagrams illustrating the LQ contributions to the running of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_4_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: RG evolution of ϵ bs with yt(MGUT) = 0.58. The dashed line lies in the region where the Yukawa couplings become non-perturbative and thus may not reflect the physical reality. Here, we neglect higher order flavor-violating terms. Comparing with the running equation of yb shown in Eq. (4.32), the  y 2 1 2 + y 2 2  term is absent here. This is a generic consequence for the third-generation specific LQ co… view at source ↗
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: The triangle diagram for the gravitational anomaly. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_4_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.6. Figure 4.6: Constraints on the B −L gauge coupling strength gB−L, enhanced by ϵ −1 = 1015 (left panel) and ϵ −1 = 1030 (right panel), as a function of mA′. The gray regions are excluded by the fifth-force tests. The green region denotes bounds from the neutrino lifetime. The red dashed line shows the current limit from ν − e elastic scattering, evaluated with the benchmark value χP1/2 L→R = 10−15 . CEνNS currently p… view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Feynman rules and diagrams for G−H+−ALP interaction in the DFSZ (left) and the PQWW (right) models. cannot be made arbitrarily small. On the other hand, b → sa0 is clearly zero due to the a0 → −a0 (or Φs → Φ ∗ s ) symmetry. Given a tiny a0 − A0 mass matrix that only softly breaks the U(1) symmetries, the a0 and A0 states can mix with a physical mixing angle θ. If indicating the light physical state by a … view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: Illustration of the two-loop Feynman diagrams contributing to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p098_5_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: A schematic illustration on the apparent non-decoupling feature heavy particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p099_5_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: The Feynman diagrams relevant to the apparent non-decoupling effects. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_5_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: The Feynman diagram for the single photon decays of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_5_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: Parameter space explaining the Belle II excess in the DFSZ model, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p105_5_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 141 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Salam, Abdus and Strathdee, J

    Pati, Jogesh C. and Salam, Abdus and Strathdee, J. A. , year = 1981, journal =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90329-1 , reportnumber =

  2. [2]

    and Popovic, M

    Mohapatra, Rabindra N. and Popovic, M. , year = 1982, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3012 , reportnumber =

  3. [3]

    and Senjanovic, Goran , year = 1983, journal =

    Mohapatra, Rabindra N. and Senjanovic, Goran , year = 1983, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.1601 , reportnumber =

  4. [4]

    and Sakita, B

    Mohapatra, Rabindra N. and Sakita, B. , year = 1980, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.1062 , editor =

  5. [5]

    Antusch, Stefan and Hinze, Kevin and Saad, Shaikh , year = 2025, month = 10, eprint =

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)069 , eprint =

    Talbert, Jim , year = 2023, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)069 , eprint =

  7. [7]

    and Rahn, Rudi and Waalewijn, Wouter J

    Marinissen, Coenraad B. and Rahn, Rudi and Waalewijn, Wouter J. , year = 2020, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135632 , eprint =

  8. [8]

    , year = 2020, journal =

    Fonseca, Renato M. , year = 2020, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.035040 , eprint =

  9. [9]

    and others , year = 1998, journal =

    Fukuda, Y. and others , year = 1998, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562 , collaboration =. hep-ex/9807003 , archiveprefix =

  10. [10]

    Ahmad, Q. R. and others , year = 2001, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.071301 , collaboration =. nucl-ex/0106015 , archiveprefix =

  11. [11]

    Ahmad, Q. R. and others , year = 2002, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301 , collaboration =. nucl-ex/0204008 , archiveprefix =

  12. [12]

    and others , year = 2025, month = 3, journal =

    Abdul Karim, M. and others , year = 2025, month = 3, journal =. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 , collaboration =. 2503.14738 , archiveprefix =

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1126/science.adq9592 , collaboration =

    Aker, Max and others , year = 2025, journal =. doi:10.1126/science.adq9592 , collaboration =. 2406.13516 , archiveprefix =

  14. [14]

    Esteban, Ivan and Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C. and Maltoni, Michele and Martinez-Soler, Ivan and Pinheiro, Jo. JHEP , volume = 12, pages = 216, doi =. 2410.05380 , archiveprefix =

  15. [15]

    , year = 1958, journal =

    Pontecorvo, B. , year = 1958, journal =

  16. [16]

    Maki, Ziro and Nakagawa, Masami and Sakata, Shoichi , year = 1962, journal =

  17. [17]

    Cabibbo, Nicola , year = 1963, journal =

  18. [18]

    doi:10.1143/PTP.49.652 , reportnumber =

    Kobayashi, Makoto and Maskawa, Toshihide , year = 1973, journal =. doi:10.1143/PTP.49.652 , reportnumber =

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1945 , reportnumber =

    Wolfenstein, Lincoln , year = 1983, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1945 , reportnumber =

  20. [20]

    doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104534 , eprint =

    Isidori, Gino and Nir, Yosef and Perez, Gilad , year = 2010, journal =. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104534 , eprint =

  21. [21]

    Fuentes-Mart. Phys. Lett. B , volume = 800, pages = 135080, doi =. 1909.02519 , archiveprefix =

  22. [22]

    and Manzari, Claudio Andrea , year = 2026, month = 2, eprint =

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Figueiredo, Carolina and Hall, Lawrence J. and Manzari, Claudio Andrea , year = 2026, month = 2, eprint =

  23. [23]

    and Georgi, Howard , year = 2001, journal =

    Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Cohen, Andrew G. and Georgi, Howard , year = 2001, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4757 , eprint =

  24. [24]

    doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)033 , eprint =

    Barbieri, Riccardo and Isidori, Gino , year = 2024, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)033 , eprint =

  25. [25]

    Davighi, Joe and Isidori, Gino , year = 2025, month = 12, eprint =

  26. [26]

    Froggatt, C. D. and Nielsen, Holger Bech , year = 1979, journal =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90316-X , reportnumber =

  27. [27]

    and Thomsen, Anders Eller , year = 2024, journal =

    Antusch, Stefan and Greljo, Admir and Stefanek, Ben A. and Thomsen, Anders Eller , year = 2024, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.151802 , eprint =

  28. [28]

    JHEP , volume = 10, pages =

    Greljo, Admir and Palavri. JHEP , volume = 10, pages =. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)005 , eprint =

  29. [29]

    Hunting for Neutrino Texture Zeros with Muon and Tau Flavor Violation

    Calibbi, Lorenzo and Gao, Xiyuan and Yuan, Man. Hunting for Neutrino Texture Zeros with Muon and Tau Flavor Violation. JHEP. 2026. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)188. arXiv:2511.08679

  30. [30]

    2512.04159 , archiveprefix =

    Greljo, Admir and Palavri. 2512.04159 , archiveprefix =

  31. [31]

    doi:10.1393/ncr/i2018-10144-0 , eprint =

    Calibbi, Lorenzo and Signorelli, Giovanni , year = 2018, journal =. doi:10.1393/ncr/i2018-10144-0 , eprint =

  32. [32]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3576-5 , eprint =

    Feruglio, Ferruccio , year = 2015, journal =. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3576-5 , eprint =

  33. [33]

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.001 , eprint =

    Xing, Zhi-zhong , year = 2020, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.001 , eprint =

  34. [34]

    doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00040 , eprint =

    Cai, Yi and Han, Tao and Li, Tong and Ruiz, Richard , year = 2018, journal =. doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00040 , eprint =

  35. [35]

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5_9 , editor =

    't Hooft, Gerard , year = 1980, journal =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7571-5_9 , editor =

  36. [36]

    doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(00)00102-2 , eprint =

    Fritzsch, Harald and Xing, Zhi-zhong , year = 2000, journal =. doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(00)00102-2 , eprint =

  37. [37]

    and others , year = 2020, journal =

    Aghanim, N. and others , year = 2020, journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , note =. 1807.06209 , archiveprefix =

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.053012 , eprint =

    Kitabayashi, Teruyuki and Yasu\`e, Masaki , year = 2016, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.053012 , eprint =

  39. [39]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.073010 , note =

    Schmidt, Michael Andreas , year = 2007, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.073010 , note =. 0705.3841 , archiveprefix =

  40. [40]

    doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/033102 , eprint =

    Zhou, Shun , year = 2016, journal =. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/3/033102 , eprint =

  41. [41]

    and Biggio, C

    Abada, A. and Biggio, C. and Bonnet, F. and Gavela, M. B. and Hambye, T. , year = 2007, journal =. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/061 , eprint =

  42. [42]

    doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)038 , eprint =

    Li, Xu and Zhang, Di and Zhou, Shun , year = 2022, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)038 , eprint =

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.73.151 , eprint =

    Kuno, Yoshitaka and Okada, Yasuhiro , year = 2001, journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.73.151 , eprint =

  44. [44]

    doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)031 , eprint =

    Crivellin, Andreas and Kirk, Fiona and Manzari, Claudio Andrea , year = 2022, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)031 , eprint =

  45. [45]

    Dinh, D. N. and Ibarra, A. and Molinaro, E. and Petcov, S. T. , year = 2012, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)125 , note =. 1205.4671 , archiveprefix =

  46. [46]

    and Petcov, S

    Bilenky, Samoil M. and Petcov, S. T. , year = 1987, journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.59.671 , note =

  47. [47]

    and Santamaria, A

    Pich, A. and Santamaria, A. and Bernabeu, J. , year = 1984, journal =

  48. [48]

    Gelmini, G. B. and Roncadelli, M. , year = 1981, journal =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90559-1 , reportnumber =

  49. [49]

    and Glashow, Sheldon Lee and Nussinov, Shmuel , year = 1981, journal =

    Georgi, Howard M. and Glashow, Sheldon Lee and Nussinov, Shmuel , year = 1981, journal =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90336-9 , reportnumber =

  50. [50]

    JHEP , volume = 11, pages = 101, doi =

    Ardu, Marco and Davidson, Sacha and Lavignac, St. JHEP , volume = 11, pages = 101, doi =. 2308.16897 , archiveprefix =

  51. [51]

    and Santamaria, Arcadi , year = 1994, journal =

    Bilenky, Mikhail S. and Santamaria, Arcadi , year = 1994, journal =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90375-1 , eprint =

  52. [52]

    doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00020-3 , eprint =

    Raidal, Martti and Santamaria, Arcadi , year = 1998, journal =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00020-3 , eprint =

  53. [53]

    , year = 2003, journal =

    Lavoura, L. , year = 2003, journal =. doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01212-7 , eprint =

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09777-3 , eprint =

    Calibbi, Lorenzo and Marcano, Xabier and Roy, Joydeep , year = 2021, journal =. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09777-3 , eprint =

  55. [55]

    doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817901019 , editor =

    Pruna, Giovanni Marco , year = 2018, journal =. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817901019 , editor =. 1801.04709 , archiveprefix =

  56. [56]

    hep-ph/0406049 , archiveprefix =

    Xing, Zhi-zhong , year = 2004, month = 6, booktitle =. hep-ph/0406049 , archiveprefix =

  57. [57]

    doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)083 , eprint =

    Fritzsch, Harald and Xing, Zhi-zhong and Zhou, Shun , year = 2011, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)083 , eprint =

  58. [58]

    doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/7/014 , eprint =

    Grimus, Walter and Lavoura, Luis , year = 2005, journal =. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/7/014 , eprint =

  59. [59]

    and Meroni, A

    Meloni, D. and Meroni, A. and Peinado, E. , year = 2014, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.053009 , eprint =

  60. [60]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.075027 , eprint =

    Kitabayashi, Teruyuki , year = 2020, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.075027 , eprint =

  61. [61]

    , year = 1977, journal =

    Fritzsch, H. , year = 1977, journal =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90408-7 , reportnumber =

  62. [62]

    doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01649-0 , eprint =

    Xing, Zhi-zhong , year = 2002, journal =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01649-0 , eprint =

  63. [63]

    King, S. F. , year = 2012, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.10.028 , eprint =

  64. [64]

    and Manohar, Aneesh V

    Jenkins, Elizabeth E. and Manohar, Aneesh V. and Stoffer, Peter , year = 2018, journal =. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)016 , note =. 1709.04486 , archiveprefix =

  65. [65]

    doi:10.1111/j.2164-0947.1977.tb02958.x , reportnumber =

    Weinberg, Steven , year = 1977, journal =. doi:10.1111/j.2164-0947.1977.tb02958.x , reportnumber =

  66. [66]

    and Georgi, Howard and Glashow, S

    De Rujula, A. and Georgi, Howard and Glashow, S. L. , year = 1977, journal =. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(77)90172-5 , reportnumber =

  67. [67]

    , year = 1977, journal =

    Wilczek, Frank and Zee, A. , year = 1977, journal =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90403-8 , note =

  68. [68]

    Harrison, P. F. and Perkins, D. H. and Scott, W. G. , year = 2002, journal =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01336-9 , eprint =

  69. [69]

    , year = 2003, journal =

    He, Xiao Gang and Zee, A. , year = 2003, journal =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00390-3 , eprint =

  70. [70]

    and Gautam, Radha Raman and Singh, Lal and Gupta, Manmohan , year = 2014, journal =

    Dev, S. and Gautam, Radha Raman and Singh, Lal and Gupta, Manmohan , year = 2014, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.013021 , eprint =

  71. [71]

    Harrison, P. F. and Scott, W. G. , year = 2002, journal =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02772-7 , eprint =

  72. [72]

    doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076201 , eprint =

    Xing, Zhi-zhong and Zhao, Zhen-hua , year = 2016, journal =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076201 , eprint =

  73. [73]

    doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acd8ce , eprint =

    Xing, Zhi-zhong , year = 2023, journal =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acd8ce , eprint =

  74. [74]

    Balaji, K. R. S. and Mohapatra, R. N. and Parida, M. K. and Paschos, E. A. , year = 2001, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.113002 , eprint =

  75. [75]

    Gell-Mann, Murray , year = 1962, journal =

  76. [76]

    and Pluciennik, Zbigniew , year = 1993, journal =

    Chankowski, Piotr H. and Pluciennik, Zbigniew , year = 1993, journal =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90330-K , eprint =

  77. [77]

    Babu, K. S. and Leung, Chung Ngoc and Pantaleone, James T. , year = 1993, journal =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90801-N , eprint =

  78. [78]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.073003 , eprint =

    Mei, Jian-wei and Xing, Zhi-zhong , year = 2004, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.073003 , eprint =

  79. [79]

    Hagedorn, Claudia and Kersten, J. Phys. Lett. B , volume = 597, pages =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.094 , eprint =

  80. [80]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.033003 , eprint =

    Chao, Wei and Zhang, He , year = 2007, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.033003 , eprint =

Showing first 80 references.