Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 84 references

In gauge/gravity duality with a Coulomb branch, a black hole forms from a collapsing brane shell and evaporates by re-emitting the very branes that built it, giving a unitary S-matrix.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:31 UTC pith:RTHHKN4D

load-bearing objection A competent, honest framework paper with a clean tunneling computation and a central interpretive claim that is explicitly an inference — worth refereeing, but the information-recovery mechanism is not yet derived. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18393 v1 pith:RTHHKN4D submitted 2026-07-20 hep-th

The black hole S-matrix in gauge/gravity duality

Emil J. Martinec This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 04.70.Dy11.25.Tq11.25.-w
keywords black hole information paradoxgauge/gravity dualityCoulomb branchD3-branesHawking radiationS-matrixunitaritybrane emission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs a complete, unitary S-matrix for black holes inside gauge/gravity duality. It starts with a shell of D3-branes collapsing on the Coulomb branch of the dual gauge theory; the collapse produces a long-lived black hole. The black hole then decays by emitting branes back onto the Coulomb branch, with a probability exponentially suppressed by the entropy change. The paper argues that these emitted branes are not freshly pair-created from the vacuum but are the original constituent branes, re-emerging after internal non-abelian degrees of freedom de-excite. If true, this gives a concrete mechanism for how information escapes a black hole and implies the interior is not a featureless vacuum.

Core claim

The central claim is that in any gauge/gravity duality with a Coulomb branch, the gravitational description of a black hole that forms from the collapse of a brane shell and then Hawking-radiates branes is unitary, because the radiated branes are the same branes that went in. The tunneling calculation yields an emission rate Γ ∼ exp(S_f − S_i), where S_f and S_i are the final and initial black hole entropies. The imaginary part of the tunneling action is exactly half the entropy change, linking the rate to the first law of black hole mechanics. The Gauss law for the brane charge, together with the small-corrections theorem and unitarity of the gauge theory, forces the charged matter emerging

What carries the argument

The central object is the Coulomb branch of the gauge theory (configurations of well-separated branes on a torus or compact hyperbolic space) together with the capped-throat geometry it sources in the bulk. The throat depth is set by the brane separation; when the shell collapses deep enough that stretched-string excitations become light, a trapped surface forms and the gauge theory deconfines. The decay rate is controlled by the tunneling action of a D3-brane in Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates, whose imaginary part equals half the change in Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, giving the Boltzmann-like factor exp(S_f − S_i).

Load-bearing premise

The inference in Section 5.2 that unitarity of charged Hawking radiation and the Gauss law require the emitted branes to be the original constituents on-shell at the horizon, rather than pair-created quanta, is argued from small-corrections and charge conservation but is not derived from a direct microscopic calculation.

What would settle it

A direct calculation in a low-dimensional holographic model showing that the emitted brane's quantum state has exponentially small fidelity with the initial microstate, or that the Gauss law can be satisfied with pair-created branes while preserving unitarity, would refute the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A unitary S-matrix exists for black holes in holographic theories with a Coulomb branch; the black hole forms and evaporates entirely within the duality.
  • The black hole interior is not a vacuum region at finite N; the constituent branes retain a non-trivial wavefunction near the horizon, resolving the information paradox by making the radiation state-dependent.
  • Each brane emission reduces the rank of the unbroken gauge group from N to N−1, so the entropy of the remaining black hole decreases by O(N) per quantum, and the Page curve turns over when the black hole has roughly √N0 branes.
  • The emission rate is exponentially suppressed as exp(S_f − S_i), so evaporation is extremely slow, but the graybody factor suppresses radiated branes below a threshold energy of order M/N.
  • For hyperbolic compactifications, the unstable Coulomb branch ensures emitted branes leave the thermal atmosphere quickly, avoiding late-time interactions that could obscure unitarity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central claim is correct, a similar mechanism may operate in other holographic dualities without a global AdS confining potential: any theory with a moduli space along which fundamental constituents can escape should exhibit a unitary black-hole S-matrix.
  • The argument suggests that the 'firewall' or complementarity puzzles may be moot: the horizon in the exact theory is a phase boundary to a deconfined non-geometric phase, not a place where local vacuum physics breaks down.
  • One could test the mechanism in lower-dimensional matrix models by tracking the entanglement of radiated D0-branes with the remaining cluster to see if the Page curve turns over as predicted.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unitary S-matrix for black holes in gauge/gravity duality, exploiting the Coulomb branch of the gauge theory. The initial state is an infalling shell of D3-branes (on T^3 or a compact hyperbolic Σ3); as the shell collapses, the bulk geometry develops a capped throat, and when the stretched strings become light the gauge theory deconfines and a long-lived black hole forms. The black hole then decays by the exponentially rare emission of D3-branes back onto the Coulomb branch, with rate Γ ∼ e^{S_f−S_i}. Section 4 derives this rate from a WKB tunneling calculation in Painlevé-Gullstrand coordinates, connecting the imaginary part of the action to the first law of black hole mechanics. Section 5 argues that unitarity of the gauge theory and Gauss law require the emitted brane to be one of the original constituents, so that the black hole interior is not approximately vacuum. The paper is careful to label some of the most important steps as inferences or estimates, but the final information-theoretic claim rests on those admittedly indirect steps.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a concrete, calculable setting in which a black hole S-matrix exists within AdS/CFT, and a physically specific mechanism—discharging the black hole by emitting its constituent D3-branes—for how information is recovered without invoking islands, wormholes, or complementarity. The WKB derivation in Section 4 is a clear strength: it is self-contained in connecting Eq. (4.9) to the first law and the universal e^{ΔS} suppression, and it correctly identifies the threshold energy of order M/N for escape (Eqs. (4.15)–(4.18)). The paper also benefits from explicit statements of its limitations, e.g., the graybody factors are estimated rather than computed and the interior conclusion is labeled an inference. However, the central unitarity/interior claim is not a direct derivation, and several load-bearing approximations—notably the S^5 averaging and the application of the small-corrections theorem—need further justification before the conclusion can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, following Eqs. (4.6)–(4.9)] The claim that the emitted brane is one of the original constituents and that the interior is therefore non-vacuum is not established by the tunneling calculation. As the paper states in §4.1, the WKB amplitude is agnostic about where the tunneling brane came from. Unitarity of the gauge theory plus Gauss law only fix the net gauge-group change U(N)→U(N−1)×U(1); they do not distinguish between escape of one of the original eigenvalues and an effective pair-creation process in which the anti-brane is absorbed. After deconfinement, the N D3-branes are described by U(N) matrix degrees of freedom, and individual brane identity is not gauge invariant. The argument that a brane from deeper inside would have a longer non-classical trajectory and hence a larger Im S assumes a semiclassical notion of 'inside' for an object that is not localized in the deconfined phase. Since the end of §5.2 conce
  2. [§3.2–§3.4, Eqs. (3.21), (3.27)–(3.33)] The formation of the trapped surface—the step that produces the black-hole intermediate state—relies on several approximations: the thin-shell limit, the uniform average over S^5 with a numerical factor 2/3 introduced in Eq. (3.21) without derivation, and the identification of horizon formation with the lightening of stretched strings via the heuristic figure of merit (3.35). The paper notes at Eq. (3.32) that the turning-point radius 'doesn’t quite match' the extremal horizon radius, and attributes the discrepancy to approximations. Since the existence of the intermediate black hole is central to the proposed S-matrix, the paper should either derive the 2/3 factor from a specific brane distribution, or show that the horizon-formation threshold is robust to O(1) changes in this factor. As written, this step is a plausible model rather than a demonstrated derivation.
  3. [§5.1–§5.2, paragraph 'Supergravity modes constitute collective singlet excitations ...'] The small-corrections theorem is invoked to rule out information transfer through the thermal atmosphere and to force the non-vacuum interior. However, each D3-brane emission changes the black hole entropy by O(N) and removes an energy of order M/N (see §4.2 and Eq. (4.16)). The emitted quantum is thus not a 'small correction' in the sense used by the theorem, whose standard assumptions involve many quanta each producing O(1) changes in the state. The paper does not explain why the theorem, as originally formulated, applies to this non-perturbative O(N) channel. The argument would be strengthened by either an extension of the theorem to this regime or an explicit statement of the weaker conclusion that follows if the theorem is not directly applicable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3, paragraph after Eq. (3.1)] The assertion that N=4 SYM on a compact hyperbolic three-manifold Σ3 has a consistent quantum theory despite the energy being unbounded below is a conjecture. Since the toroidal case already provides the unitary S-matrix, the hyperbolic case should be explicitly presented as conditional on this conjecture.
  2. [Eq. (4.9)] The notation C∗(r+) is used without definition. Please define it or replace with the explicit R-R potential component used in the preceding paragraph.
  3. [§5.1, paragraph 'If you can’t account ...'] Typo: 'than there is no hope' should read 'then there is no hope.'
  4. [§3.4, final paragraph] The phrase 'a kind of holar wind' is unclear. If 'holar' is a term of art from Ref. [21], it should be defined at first use; otherwise, a more standard description (e.g., 'Coulomb-branch wind') would be clearer.
  5. [Ref. [75]] The reference 'Work in progress' with no arXiv number or date is not citable as given. Either provide further details or remove it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation; the central unitarity claim is an explicitly admitted inference from gauge-theory unitarity, not a self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The paper does not exhibit a circular derivation. The emission amplitude in §4.1 is computed from the WKB tunneling action (4.6), with the pole (4.7) and the first law giving Im S = −1/2 dS_BH (4.9); the rate Γ ∼ exp(S_f − S_i) then follows as a consequence, not as an input. The capped-throat/horizon-formation discussion in §3 is supported by the shell junction conditions (3.27) and the figure of merit (3.35)–(3.36), with [32,33] only supplying the effective-action framework. The principal claim that the emitted brane is one of the original branes and that the interior is non-vacuum is explicitly labeled in §5.2 as 'an inference based on the small corrections theorem, the unitarity of the dynamics, and the Gauss law for the brane charge, rather than a direct calculation.' That is an acknowledged logical reliance on the external unitarity assumption of gauge/gravity duality, not a self-referential reduction of an equation to itself. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no cited uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is used to force the conclusion. Self-citations [20–22,32,33] are background and are supplemented by derivations in this paper; the tunneling calculation itself is explicitly 'agnostic about where the tunneling brane came from' (§4), so the later assertion of brane origin is an additional inference rather than an equation-level circularity. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of gauge/gravity duality and on the effective-field-theory picture of separated branes collapsing to form a black hole. Since the paper is a theoretical framework and not a calculation matched to data, it has no fitted numerical parameters. The main free choice is the S^5-averaging factor (2/3) and the thin-shell approximation in the junction conditions. The existence of a consistent field theory on hyperbolic compact manifolds is assumed without independent evidence.

free parameters (1)
  • S^5 averaging factor (2/3) = 2/3
    In Section 3.2, the brane shell is averaged over the angular S^5, introducing a factor 2/3 in the Israel junction condition (3.21). This is a modeling choice, not a derived constant; the exact finite-thickness shell is not treated.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Gauge/gravity duality between N=4 SYM and type IIB strings on AdS5×S5 (and its T^3/Σ3 compactifications) is valid.
    The entire construction presumes the duality map is exact; used throughout, first stated in Section 1.
  • domain assumption The Coulomb branch of the gauge theory is described in the bulk by separated brane sources whose effective action is a sum of DBI actions coupled to supergravity.
    Used in Section 3.2 to model the infalling shell; valid only when W-strings are heavy.
  • domain assumption The small corrections theorem (Mathur) applies to the brane-emission channel, ensuring that unless the near-horizon state differs from vacuum by more than 1/S, the Page curve cannot turn over.
    Invoked in Section 5.1 to argue the Hawking calculation fails and the interior cannot be vacuum.
  • ad hoc to paper N=4 SYM on a compact hyperbolic manifold Σ3 has a consistent quantum theory despite being non-supersymmetric and having an unbounded energy.
    The paper says 'we expect that there is a consistent quantum theory' (Section 3), but no independent evidence or construction is given.
  • domain assumption The brane tunneling calculation is the correct description of the emission rate, with the emitted brane identified with the original brane via the gauge theory map.
    The tunneling result (4.9) is standard; the identification with the original brane is the paper's novel inference in Section 5.2.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 30513 in / 16029 out tokens · 136884 ms · 2026-08-01T15:31:24.031257+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A variety of examples of gauge/gravity duality have a Coulomb branch for the gauge theory dynamics. We exploit this feature to construct an S-matrix, in which the initial state is a shell of branes converging on the origin of the Coulomb branch. In the gravitational dual, the shell of branes sources a geometry with a capped throat; the cap descends from the asymptotic region to larger and larger redshift. A trapped surface forms when the redshift of the cap reaches the point where the excitation of strings stretching between the branes is unsuppressed, and the dual gauge theory deconfines. The intermediate state is a long-lived black hole, which then decays via the slow emission of branes back onto the Coulomb branch. We compare and contrast the descriptions of this process in the bulk effective field theory and the dual gauge theory; and discuss the consequences of this construction for the black hole information paradox.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 76 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    A. W. Peet,TASI lectures on black holes in string theory, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 99): Strings, Branes, and Gravity, pp. 353–433, 8, 2000, hep-th/0008241, DOI

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002, [1905.08255]

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002, [1905.08255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP03(2022) 205, [1911.11977]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind,M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5112–5128, [hep-th/9610043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Bigatti and L

    D. Bigatti and L. Susskind,Review of matrix theory,NATO Sci. Ser. C520(1999) 277–318, [hep-th/9712072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Banks,TASI lectures on matrix theory, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 99): Strings, Branes, and Gravity, pp

    T. Banks,TASI lectures on matrix theory, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 99): Strings, Branes, and Gravity, pp. 495–542, 5, 1999,hep-th/9911068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    Polchinski,M theory and the light cone,Prog

    J. Polchinski,M theory and the light cone,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.134(1999) 158–170, [hep-th/9903165]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    Taylor,M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory,Rev

    W. Taylor,M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory,Rev. Mod. Phys. 73(2001) 419–462, [hep-th/0101126]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    H. W. Lin,TASI lectures on Matrix Theory from a modern viewpoint,2508.20970

    arXiv

  11. [11]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, I. R. Klebanov and L. Susskind,Schwarzschild black holes in matrix theory. 2., JHEP01(1998) 008, [hep-th/9711005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    I. R. Klebanov and L. Susskind,Schwarzschild black holes in various dimensions from matrix theory, Phys. Lett. B416(1998) 62–66, [hep-th/9709108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    G. T. Horowitz and E. J. Martinec,Comments on black holes in matrix theory,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 4935–4941, [hep-th/9710217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler and I. R. Klebanov,Evaporation of Schwarzschild black holes in matrix theory, Phys. Lett. B423(1998) 54–58, [hep-th/9712236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  15. [15]

    Li and E

    M. Li and E. J. Martinec,Probing matrix black holes,hep-th/9801070

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Itzhaki, J

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 046004, [hep-th/9802042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    Massar and R

    S. Massar and R. Parentani,How the change in horizon area drives black hole evaporation,Nucl. Phys. B575(2000) 333–356, [gr-qc/9903027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  18. [18]

    M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek,Hawking radiation as tunneling,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 5042–5045, [hep-th/9907001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Vanzo, G

    L. Vanzo, G. Acquaviva and R. Di Criscienzo,Tunnelling Methods and Hawking’s radiation: achievements and prospects,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 183001, [1106.4153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Wenren,Hyperbolic Black Holes and Open String Production,1709.03590

    D. Wenren,Hyperbolic Black Holes and Open String Production,1709.03590

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    E. J. Martinec,The Holar Wind,2303.00234. 35

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    E. J. Martinec,Charge currents, rare decays, and black holes,2303.17139

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Birmingham,Topological black holes in Anti-de Sitter space,Class

    D. Birmingham,Topological black holes in Anti-de Sitter space,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) 1197–1205, [hep-th/9808032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  24. [24]

    Emparan,AdS membranes wrapped on surfaces of arbitrary genus,Phys

    R. Emparan,AdS membranes wrapped on surfaces of arbitrary genus,Phys. Lett. B432(1998) 74–82, [hep-th/9804031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Emparan,AdS / CFT duals of topological black holes and the entropy of zero energy states,JHEP 06(1999) 036, [hep-th/9906040]

    R. Emparan,AdS / CFT duals of topological black holes and the entropy of zero energy states,JHEP 06(1999) 036, [hep-th/9906040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  26. [26]

    Horowitz, A

    G. Horowitz, A. Lawrence and E. Silverstein,Insightful D-branes,JHEP07(2009) 057, [0904.3922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    J. L. F. Barbon and J. Martinez-Magan,Spontaneous fragmentation of topological black holes,JHEP08 (2010) 031, [1005.4439]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Henriksson, C

    O. Henriksson, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Brane nucleation instabilities in non-AdS/non-CFT,JHEP02 (2020) 007, [1910.06348]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Henriksson,Black brane evaporation through D-brane bubble nucleation,Phys

    O. Henriksson,Black brane evaporation through D-brane bubble nucleation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L041901, [2106.13254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505–532, [hep-th/9803131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur and N. P. Warner,Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory,2204.13113

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    E. J. Martinec and Y. Zigdon,BPS fivebrane stars. Part III. Effective actions,JHEP03(2025) 074, [2411.16630]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    E. J. Martinec and Y. Zigdon,BPS fivebrane stars and BTZ black holes,JHEP04(2026) 056, [2512.08729]

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Skenderis and M

    K. Skenderis and M. Taylor,The fuzzball proposal for black holes,Phys. Rept.467(2008) 117–171, [0804.0552]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Shigemori,Superstrata,Gen

    M. Shigemori,Superstrata,Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 51, [2002.01592]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    E. J. Martinec and S. Massai,String Theory of Supertubes,JHEP07(2018) 163, [1705.10844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    E. J. Martinec, S. Massai and D. Turton,Little Strings, Long Strings, and Fuzzballs,JHEP11(2019) 019, [1906.11473]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Preskill, P

    J. Preskill, P. Schwarz, A. D. Shapere, S. Trivedi and F. Wilczek,Limitations on the statistical description of black holes,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 2353–2362

    1991

  39. [39]

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg and J. Shan,Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 128, [2207.00408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    I. Bena, R. Dulac, E. J. Martinec, M. Shigemori, D. Turton and N. P. Warner,Effective microstructure, JHEP12(2025) 130, [2508.10977]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Kolanowski, D

    M. Kolanowski, D. Marolf, I. Rakic, M. Rangamani and G. J. Turiaci,Looking at extremal black holes from very far away,JHEP04(2025) 020, [2409.16248]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Dijkgraaf, E

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde,Notes on matrix and micro strings,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.68(1998) 28–54, [hep-th/9709107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  43. [43]

    Seiberg,New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory onT 5 andT 5/Z2,Phys

    N. Seiberg,New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory onT 5 andT 5/Z2,Phys. Lett. B408(1997) 98–104, [hep-th/9705221]. 36

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  44. [44]

    J. M. Maldacena,Statistical entropy of near extremal five-branes,Nucl. Phys.B477(1996) 168–174, [hep-th/9605016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  45. [45]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,The D1/D5 system and singular CFT,JHEP04(1999) 017, [hep-th/9903224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  46. [46]

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri,Strings inAdS 3 and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2929–2960, [hep-th/0001053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  47. [47]

    A. R. Brown, L. V. Iliesiu, G. Penington and M. Usatyuk,The evaporation of charged black holes,JHEP 01(2026) 109, [2411.03447]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    E. J. Martinec and V. Sahakian,Black holes and the superYang-Mills phase diagram. 2.,Phys. Rev. D 59(1999) 124005, [hep-th/9810224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  49. [49]

    E. J. Martinec and V. Sahakian,Black holes and five-brane thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 064002, [hep-th/9901135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  50. [50]

    Taylor,D-brane field theory on compact spaces,Phys

    W. Taylor,D-brane field theory on compact spaces,Phys. Lett. B394(1997) 283–287, [hep-th/9611042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, I. R. Klebanov and L. Susskind,Schwarzschild black holes from matrix theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 226–229, [hep-th/9709091]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  52. [52]

    Li and E

    M. Li and E. J. Martinec,On the entropy of matrix black holes,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) 3205–3213, [hep-th/9704134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Wilczek,Selfinteraction correction to black hole radiance,Nucl. Phys. B433(1995) 403–420, [gr-qc/9408003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  54. [54]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Wilczek,Effect of selfinteraction on charged black hole radiance,Nucl. Phys. B437 (1995) 231–242, [hep-th/9411219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  55. [55]

    I. R. Klebanov,String theory in two-dimensions, inSpring School on String Theory and Quantum Gravity (to be followed by Workshop), 7, 1991,hep-th/9108019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991

  56. [56]

    P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore,Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, 10, 1993, hep-th/9304011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  57. [57]

    E. J. Martinec,Matrix models and 2D string theory, inNATO Advanced Study Institute: Marie Curie Training Course: Applications of Random Matrices in Physics, 10, 2004,hep-th/0410136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  58. [58]

    Abou Zeid and C

    M. Abou Zeid and C. M. Hull,Intrinsic geometry of D-branes,Phys. Lett. B404(1997) 264–270, [hep-th/9704021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    H. A. Chamblin and H. S. Reall,Dynamic dilatonic domain walls,Nucl. Phys. B562(1999) 133–157, [hep-th/9903225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  60. [60]

    Kraus,Dynamics of anti-de Sitter domain walls,JHEP12(1999) 011, [hep-th/9910149]

    P. Kraus,Dynamics of anti-de Sitter domain walls,JHEP12(1999) 011, [hep-th/9910149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  61. [61]

    Stoica, S

    H. Stoica, S. H. H. Tye and I. Wasserman,Cosmology in the Randall-Sundrum brane world scenario, Phys. Lett. B482(2000) 205–212, [hep-th/0004126]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  62. [62]

    Mukohyama,Perturbation of junction condition and doubly gauge invariant variables,Class

    S. Mukohyama,Perturbation of junction condition and doubly gauge invariant variables,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 4777–4798, [hep-th/0006146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  63. [63]

    Kofinas,New perspectives on moving domain walls in (A)dS(5) space,Nucl

    G. Kofinas,New perspectives on moving domain walls in (A)dS(5) space,Nucl. Phys. B622(2002) 347–364, [hep-th/0103045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  64. [64]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B44S10(1966) 1. 37

    1966

  65. [65]

    Bena, C.-W

    I. Bena, C.-W. Wang and N. P. Warner,Mergers and typical black hole microstates,JHEP11(2006) 042, [hep-th/0608217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [66]

    Hemming and E

    S. Hemming and E. Keski-Vakkuri,Hawking radiation from AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 044006, [gr-qc/0005115]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  67. [67]

    Wu and Q.-Q

    S.-Q. Wu and Q.-Q. Jiang,Remarks on Hawking radiation as tunneling from the BTZ black holes, JHEP03(2006) 079, [hep-th/0602033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    Keski-Vakkuri and P

    E. Keski-Vakkuri and P. Kraus,Microcanonical D-branes and back reaction,Nucl. Phys. B491(1997) 249–262, [hep-th/9610045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  69. [69]

    Harmark, J

    T. Harmark, J. Natario and R. Schiappa,Greybody Factors for d-Dimensional Black Holes,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.14(2010) 727–794, [0708.0017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    S. D. Mathur,The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 224001, [0909.1038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    B. Guo, M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur and M. Mehta,Contrasting the fuzzball and wormhole paradigms for black holes,Turk. J. Phys.45(2021) 281–365, [2111.05295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski,A correspondence principle for black holes and strings,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6189–6197, [hep-th/9612146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  73. [73]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091, [0806.1218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  74. [74]

    Itzhaki, D

    N. Itzhaki, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg,Non-supersymmetric deformations of non-critical superstrings, JHEP12(2005) 035, [hep-th/0510087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  75. [75]

    E. J. Martinec, D. Turton and N. P. Warner,Work in progress,

  76. [76]

    M. R. Douglas, I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, J. M. Maldacena, E. J. Martinec and N. Seiberg,A New hat for thec=1 matrix model, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, 7, 2003,hep-th/0307195

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  77. [77]

    Witten,On string theory and black holes,Phys

    E. Witten,On string theory and black holes,Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 314–324

    1991

  78. [78]

    Kazakov, I

    V. Kazakov, I. K. Kostov and D. Kutasov,A Matrix model for the two-dimensional black hole,Nucl. Phys.B622(2002) 141–188, [hep-th/0101011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  79. [79]

    Giveon, D

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, E. Rabinovici and A. Sever,Phases of quantum gravity inAdS 3 and linear dilaton backgrounds,Nucl. Phys.B719(2005) 3–34, [hep-th/0503121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  80. [80]

    Susskind, L

    L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum,The Stretched horizon and black hole complementarity,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 3743–3761, [hep-th/9306069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

Showing first 80 references.