Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 71 references

The paper claims that unstable modes in jammed amorphous solids grow and saturate according to a parameter-free Stuart–Landau equation, and that the final structural rearrangement is independent of the initial perturbation shape.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 11:37 UTC pith:34IIT3LU

load-bearing objection New and clean amplitude equation for generalized-Hessian instabilities, but the energy-drop prediction is only tested on two-cell replicas and rests on an unexamined fixed-contact assumption. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19818 v2 pith:34IIT3LU submitted 2026-07-22 cond-mat.stat-mech

Weakly Nonlinear Dynamics of Unstable Modes in Jammed Amorphous Solids

Kota Noto , Harukuni Ikeda , Kuniyasu Saitoh , Hisao Hayakawa This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords jammed amorphous solidsgeneralized Hessianunstable modesweakly nonlinear analysisStuart–Landau equationstructural rearrangementgranular materialsdispersion relation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that structural rearrangements triggered by instability in jammed amorphous solids have a compact, universal description: the amplitude of an unstable finite-wave-number mode follows a Landau-type equation whose coefficients are determined entirely by the static packing geometry. The authors show numerically, on replicated two-cell packings, that this equation captures both the exponential growth and later saturation of the mode, and that the relaxed final state is the same whether the perturbation is an eigenmode, a sine wave, or a square wave. If correct, static Hessian data alone set the energy scale of instability-driven rearrangements, without needing a deformation history or any fitting parameters. The predicted potential-energy drop is a ratio of the square of the linear instability rate to a quartic coefficient.

Core claim

The central claim is that a weakly nonlinear amplitude equation, derived by projecting the overdamped equations of motion onto the single unstable critical mode, governs the growth and saturation of unstable modes in jammed amorphous solids. The equation is η Ȧ_c = λ'_c A_c − (1/6)χ_c |A_c|²A_c, with saturation |A_{c,∞}|² = 6λ'_c/χ_c and potential-energy drop δV∞ ≈ −3λ'²/(2χ_c). The authors validate this on two-cell replicated packings: the final displacement field is insensitive to the initial perturbation shape, and the predicted |δV∞| correlates with simulation results across pressures and system sizes, although the long-time limit is not captured exactly.

What carries the argument

The key object is the generalized Hessian D(k), a wave-number-dependent Hermitian matrix obtained by Fourier transforming the Hessian blocks over periodically replicated disorder cells. Its lowest negative eigenvalue at a critical wave vector selects an unstable 'critical mode'. Projecting the displacement onto this single mode and keeping only the resonant cubic term — quadratic terms vanish under the Fourier-space solvability condition — yields the Landau-type amplitude equation. The nonlinear coefficient χ_c is a contact sum of fourth-order potential derivatives contracted with the eigenmode, encoding the saturation and the energy scale of the rearrangement.

Load-bearing premise

The whole prediction rests on treating a jammed packing as perfect periodic copies of a single disordered cell, so that a Bloch-like wave number and the generalized Hessian built from one replicated cell are exact; realistic amorphous solids are not such replicas.

What would settle it

Take a genuinely aperiodic jammed packing (not a two-cell replicated tile), perturb it with the same eigenmode-based, sinusoidal, and square-wave deformations, and compare the final displacement field and potential-energy drop with predictions computed from the single-cell generalized Hessian and quartic coefficient; significant mismatch would falsify the claim. A more targeted test would measure the amplitude equation's saturation for different damping constants and check whether the predicted |δV∞| = 3λ'²/(2χ) holds when the packing's cell structure is randomized.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the claim is correct, the final structural rearrangement after exciting an unstable mode is determined by the mode itself, not by the shape of the initial perturbation.
  • The saturation amplitude and the potential-energy drop can be computed directly from a static packing (its generalized Hessian and quartic coefficients), with no deformation history or adjustable parameters.
  • Instability can be identified from an undeformed reference configuration, unlike standard analysis that requires a sequence of deformed and relaxed states.
  • The predicted relation |δV∞| ≈ 3λ'²/(2χ) organizes sample-to-sample scatter across pressures and cell sizes, suggesting a geometric origin for the energy of plastic rearrangements.
  • When multiple negative eigenvalues coexist, the response involves mixing of unstable modes; the paper notes that the proportion of each contributing mode is not yet clarified.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the derivation assumes perfect periodic replication of a single disordered cell, its transfer to a genuinely aperiodic packing is an extrapolation; a direct test would check whether single-cell data still predict the final displacements and energy drops of a non-tiled, fully disordered sample.
  • The overdamped Landau form should break down at small damping, where inertial effects become non-negligible; this suggests a testable damping-rate dependence in experiments or molecular dynamics of granular or colloidal suspensions.
  • The energy-drop formula resembles an Eshelby-inclusion eigenstrain scale, offering a route to predict plastic-event energies from static geometry alone, and to connect instability mode growth to avalanche statistics.
  • Tessellated granular metamaterials, whose cell structure can be engineered and repeated periodically, are a natural experimental platform to test the predicted λ'²/χ scaling directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies instabilities in jammed amorphous solids using a generalized, wave-vector-dependent Hessian defined for a periodic tiling of identical disordered cells. Negative eigenvalues of this generalized Hessian identify unstable finite-wavevector modes. The authors derive a Stuart–Landau amplitude equation for the critical mode, Eq. (20), with coefficients computed directly from the second-, third-, and fourth-order potential expansions, and predict saturation amplitude |A∞|²=6λ′/χ and potential-energy drop δV∞≈−3λ′²/(2χ), Eq. (41). Numerical simulations on two-cell replicas are presented to support the predicted growth dynamics, the insensitivity of the final state to initial perturbation shape, and the statistical scaling of δV∞ with λ′²/χ. The theory contains no fitted parameters.

Significance. If valid, the framework is significant because it provides a parameter-free, static-input prediction of the energy scale of instability-driven rearrangements in jammed packings, and it connects linear dispersion data to nonlinear saturation. Strengths include the explicit, self-contained derivation of the amplitude-equation coefficients in the appendices, the absence of free parameters, and the tests of initial-condition independence. The main limitations are that the numerical validation is confined to perfectly replicated two-cell systems and that the nonlinear theory assumes a fixed contact network; these issues directly affect the breadth and strength of the central claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (17), (20), (32), (40), (41); Secs. 4.1 and 4.3] The saturation prediction presupposes a fixed contact network. The expansion (17) is performed around the force-balanced configuration using the harmonic potential (3), which contains a Heaviside function; once any contact reaches its rest length, the potential is no longer polynomial in the displacement and the quartic expansion (40) ceases to represent the dynamics. The simulations are reported to relax into a different stable configuration (Sec. 4.1), but no diagnostic is given for whether contacts break before the predicted saturation amplitude is reached. If contact opening occurs first, the observed δV∞ is governed by the contact-network change rather than by the χE nonlinearity, and the statistical agreement in Fig. 9 could be incidental. The authors should monitor contact breaking times during the trajectories and either verify that no contacts break before A_E,∞, restrict the va
  2. [Secs. 2.2, 4.1 and 5] All numerical validation is performed on two-cell replicas of a single disordered cell. In this geometry, the Bloch-type periodicity assumption underlying Eqs. (8)–(9) holds by construction, so the simulations cannot test the transferability of the framework to a genuinely aperiodic amorphous solid. The authors acknowledge this in Sec. 2.2 (assumptions (i) and (ii) are idealizations) and in Sec. 5, but the abstract and introduction claim a description of structural evolution in jammed amorphous solids. To make the central claim load-bearing, the authors should either test non-replicated or partially disordered cell arrays, or substantially narrow the stated scope of the conclusions.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Figs. 8 and 9] The single-trajectory comparison in Fig. 8 shows that the long-time potential-energy drop is not reproduced exactly, despite the theory being parameter-free. Since δV∞ is the central quantitative prediction, this discrepancy is not a minor detail. The statistical support in Fig. 9 consists of broad sample-to-sample scatter, and the claim of agreement is based on visual inspection of arithmetic means. Because both axes contain λ′²/χ, an apparent correlation may arise even if the saturation mechanism is not the one described by Eq. (41). The authors should quantify the agreement (e.g., correlation coefficient or mean absolute log-error), and analyze whether the discrepancies correlate with contact changes or with multi-mode coupling.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (42) and Fig. 8] The perturbation amplitude is written as B/√N in Eq. (42), while Fig. 8 uses A* = A_E,0/√N. The relationship between B, A_E,0, and A* should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Appendix C] There are apparent typographical errors in the exponentials, e.g., 'e^{−kxL}' should likely be 'e^{−ik_xL}', and the shift from cell indices to the offsets in Eq. (61)–(62) is hard to follow. A careful revision of the notation would improve reproducibility.
  3. [General] Several references and phrases contain formatting artifacts (e.g., 'Schoenholzet al.' lacks a space, 'E. Lerner, ... Phys. Rev. E.93' has a misplaced dot, and 'Screiber-Re’em' is misspelled). These should be corrected.
  4. [Appendix G] The statement that 'we were unable to clarify the proportion in which each mode contributes to the mixing' is a significant open question for the multi-mode case; it should be presented as a clear limitation in the main text, not only in an appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Landau-equation prediction is derived from static potential derivatives and compared against un-fitted numerical relaxation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation (Eqs. 17-20, 32, 40-41) computes λ'_E and χ_E from derivatives of the potential at the force-balanced configuration, then algebraically obtains the saturation amplitude and the predicted energy drop δV∞ ≈ -3λ'^2/(2χ). The numerical comparison (Figs. 8, 9, 13) measures the actual relaxed potential drop from the full overdamped equations of motion, with no parameter fitted to the predicted quantity; this is an independent, though approximate, validation. The generalized Hessian D(k) is taken from prior work (Refs. 32,33) and is explicitly acknowledged as an idealization not derived from first principles for disordered systems, which is a scope limitation rather than circularity. The paper's self-citations (Refs. 14,15,47) are contextual and not load-bearing for the main claim. The fixed-contact assumption underlying the Taylor expansion is a possible correctness risk, but the manuscript does not define the prediction in terms of the simulation outcome, and no quoted step reduces a predicted result to an input by construction. Therefore no circular step meeting the required evidence standard is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central prediction rests on the periodic-cell/Bloch ansatz and the single-mode projection; both are acknowledged as uncontrolled for realistic disorder. Within the replicated-cell model the derivation is parameter-free: no fitted constants enter the amplitude equation.

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The amorphous medium can be partitioned into quasi-periodic cells, each containing the identical replicated particle configuration, so that the Hessian blocks are translationally invariant.
    Sec. 2.2 assumptions (i) and (ii); the authors state these 'are idealizations and are not expected to hold exactly in realistic amorphous solids.'
  • domain assumption Inter-cell coupling is sufficiently weak that off-diagonal wavevector interactions can be neglected, and the linear response is dominated by a single k mode.
    Sec. 2.2 assumptions (iii) and (iv); the single-mode approximation is used in the nonlinear projection and is violated in the multi-negative-eigenvalue cases of Appendix G.
  • domain assumption The dynamics is overdamped: η ȧr = −δV/δr (eq. (1)), with inertial effects neglected.
    Used throughout; the authors note the theory breaks for sufficiently small η where inertia matters (Sec. 4.3).
  • domain assumption The harmonic contact potential (eq. (3)) is differentiable to fourth order around the reference configuration and the contact network is unchanged during the nonlinear evolution.
    The Taylor expansion in eq. (17) contains no contact-breaking/creation terms; the authors only mention avalanche-like rearrangements as outside scope at the end of Sec. 4.3.
  • standard math The lowest eigenvalue of the generalized Hessian is nondegenerate at the selected wavevectors, and floating-particle zero modes are excluded from the spectrum.
    Required for the spectral projection in eqs. (13)-(15); numerically verified for the examples studied (Sec. 2.2).
  • domain assumption The nonlinear coefficient χ_E is positive for the unstable samples considered, so the cubic term saturates the instability.
    Numerically confirmed for all samples considered (Sec. 3.2); without χ>0 the Landau truncation would require a quintic term.
  • domain assumption The system is stable at large scales and unstable only at finite wavevectors, with π/L acting as a UV cutoff.
    Required for the weakly nonlinear inversion discussed at the start of Sec. 3.1; the paper asserts this behavior for the dispersion branches studied.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31425 in / 19977 out tokens · 209258 ms · 2026-08-01T11:37:11.047762+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the structural evolution in jammed amorphous solids by analyzing the eigenmodes of a generalized Hessian matrix that incorporates spatial modulation via wave numbers. Unlike the conventional Hessian, this generalized formulation captures linearly unstable modes through a Fourier-based extension of the Hessian matrix, enabling us to study responses beyond the mechanically stable regime. We demonstrate that the excitation of unstable eigenmodes leads to structural rearrangements independent of the initial perturbation by the simulation. Furthermore, we derive a weakly nonlinear amplitude equation to describe the growth and saturation of these unstable modes, analogous to the Landau equation. Our framework provides a pathway to understand instability-driven configuration changes in disordered solids.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    H. M. Jaeger, S. R. Nagel, and R. P. Behringer, Granular solids, liquids, and gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1259 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1259

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.1259 1996

  2. [2]

    D. J. Durian, Foam Mechanics at the Bubble Scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4780 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4780

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4780 1995

  3. [3]

    Wyart, On the rigidity of amorphous solids, Ann

    M. Wyart, On the rigidity of amorphous solids, Ann. Phys. Fr. 30, 1 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1051/anphys:2006003

    work page doi:10.1051/anphys:2006003 2005

  4. [4]

    Baule, F

    A. Baule, F. Morone, H. J. Herrmann, and H. A. Makse, Edwards statistical mechanics for jammed granular matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015006 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015006

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015006 2018

  5. [5]

    Liu and S

    A. Liu and S. Nagel, Jamming is not just cool any more, Nature (London) 396, 21 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1038/23819

    doi:10.1038/23819 1998

  6. [6]

    C. S. O'Hern, L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: The epitome of disorder, Phys. Rev. E 68 011306 (2003). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.011306

    doi:10.1103/physreve.68.011306 2003

  7. [7]

    van Hecke, Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostaticity, J

    M. van Hecke, Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostaticity, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 033101 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/3/033101

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/3/033101 2010

  8. [8]

    A. J. Liu and S. R. Nagel, The jamming transition and the marginally jammed solid, Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 347 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104045

    doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104045 2010

  9. [9]

    Zaccone, Theory of Disordered Solids: From Atomistic Dynamics to Mechanical, Vibrational, and Thermal Properties, (Springer Nature, Cham, 2023)

    A. Zaccone, Theory of Disordered Solids: From Atomistic Dynamics to Mechanical, Vibrational, and Thermal Properties, (Springer Nature, Cham, 2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Hayakawa and S

    H. Hayakawa and S. Takada, Nonlinear Rheology: Non-equilibrium Statistical Physics of Granular Materials (Kyoritsu, Tokyo, 2025) in Japanese

    2025

  11. [11]

    Maloney and A

    C. Maloney and A. Lema\^itre, Universal Breakdown of Elasticity at the Onset of Material Failure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 195501 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.195501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.195501 2004

  12. [12]

    Maloney and A

    C. Maloney and A. Lema\^itre, Amorphous systems in athermal, quasistatic shear, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016118 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016118

    doi:10.1103/physreve.74.016118 2006

  13. [13]

    Lema\^itre and C

    A. Lema\^itre and C. Maloney, Sum Rules for the Quasi-Static and Visco-Elastic Response of Disordered Solids at Zero Temperature, J. Stat. Phys. 123, 415 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-9015-5

    doi:10.1007/s10955-005-9015-5 2006

  14. [14]

    Ishima, Saitoh, M

    D. Ishima, Saitoh, M. Otsuki, and H. Hayakawa, Eigenvalue analysis of stress-strain curve of two-dimensional amorphous solids of dispersed frictional grains with finite shear strain, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.034904 Phys. Rev. E 107, 034904 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.107.034904 2023

  15. [15]

    Ishima, K

    D. Ishima, K. Saitoh, M. Otsuki, and H. Hayakawa, Theory of rigidity and numerical analysis of density of states of two-dimensional amorphous solids with dispersed frictional grains in the linear response regime, Phys. Rev. E 107, 054902 (2023). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054902

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.107.054902 2023

  16. [16]

    Y. Hara, R. Matsuoka, H. Ebata, D. Mizuno, and A. Ikeda, A link between anomalous viscous loss and the boson peak in soft jammed solids.Nat. Phys. 21, 262 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02722-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02722-7 2025

  17. [17]

    Mizuno, K

    H. Mizuno, K. Saitoh, and L. E. Silbert, Elastic moduli and vibrational modes in jammed particulate packings, Phys. Rev. E 93, 062905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.062905

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.062905 2016

  18. [18]

    Gartner and E

    L. Gartner and E. Lerner, Nonlinear plastic modes in disordered solids, Phys. Rev. E 93, 011001 (2016). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.011001

    doi:10.1103/physreve.93.011001 2016

  19. [19]

    Bonfanti, R

    S. Bonfanti, R. Guerra, C. Mondal,I. Procaccia and S. Zapperi, Elementary plastic events in amorphous silica, Phys. Rev. E 100, 060602 (2019). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.060602

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.100.060602 2019

  20. [20]

    D. Xu, S. Zhanghttps, A. J. Liuhttps, S. R. Nagel, and N. Xu, Discontinuous instabilities in disordered solids, Proc. Nat. Acad. Science 120, e2304974120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304974120

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2304974120 2023

  21. [21]

    Lerner, G

    E. Lerner, G. D\" u ring, and E. Bouchbinder, Statistics and Properties of Low-Frequency Vibrational Modes in Structural Glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 035501 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.035501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.035501 2016

  22. [22]

    Kapteijns, D

    G. Kapteijns, D. Richard, and E. Lerner, Nonlinear quasilocalized excitations in glasses: True representatives of soft spots, Phys. Rev. E 101, 032130 (2020). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.032130

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.101.032130 2020

  23. [23]

    M. L. Manning and A. J. Liu, Vibrational Modes Identify Soft Spots in a Sheared Disordered Packing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 108302 (2011). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.108302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.108302 2011

  24. [24]

    Mizuno, H

    H. Mizuno, H. Shiba, and A. Ikeda, Continuum limit of the vibrational properties of amorphous solids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, E9767-E9774 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1709015114

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1709015114 2017

  25. [25]

    D. L. Malandro and D. J. Lacks,Molecular-Level Mechanical Instabilities and Enhanced Self-Diffusion in Flowing Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5576 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5576

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5576 1998

  26. [26]

    Dagois-Bohy, B

    S. Dagois-Bohy, B. P. Tighe, J. Simon, S. Henkes, and M. van Hecke, Soft-Sphere Packings at Finite Pressure but Unstable to Shear, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 095703 (2012). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.095703

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.095703 2012

  27. [27]

    C. P. Goodrich, S. Dagois-Bohy, B. P. Tighe, M. van Hecke, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Jamming in finite systems: Stability, anisotropy, fluctuations, and scaling, Phys. Rev. E 90, 022138 (2014). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.022138

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.022138 2014

  28. [28]

    D. Xu, S. Zhang, H. Tong, L. Wang, and N.Xu, Low-frequency vibrational density of states of ordinary and ultra-stable glasses, Nat. Commun. 15, 1424 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45671-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45671-8 2024

  29. [29]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. Maharana, S. Karmakar, and K. Ramola, Instabilities govern the low-frequency vibrational spectrum of amorphous solids, J. Chem. Phys. 163, 024512 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0279200

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0279200 2025

  30. [30]

    Torquato, and F

    S. Torquato, and F. H. Stillinger, Multiplicity of Generation, Selection, and Classification Procedures for Jammed Hard-Particle Packings, J. Phys. Chem. 105, 11849 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011960q

    work page doi:10.1021/jp011960q 2001

  31. [31]

    Z. W. Wu, Y. Chen, W. H. Wang, W. Kob, and L. Xu, Topology of vibrational modes predicts plastic events in glasses, Nature Commun. 14, 2955 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38547-w

    doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38547-w 2023

  32. [32]

    S. S. Schoenholz, C. P. Goodrich, O. Kogan, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Stability of jammed packings II: the transverse length scale, Soft Matter, 9, 11000 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM51096D

    work page doi:10.1039/c3sm51096d 2013

  33. [33]

    R. C. Dennis, V. F. Hagh, and E. I. Corwin, Emergence of zero modes in disordered solids under periodic tiling, Phys. Rev. E 106, 044901 (2022). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.044901

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.044901 2022

  34. [34]

    Otsuki, and H

    M. Otsuki, and H. Hayakawa, An exact expression of three-body system for the complex shear modulus of frictional granular materials, Soft Matter, 19, 2127 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SM01565J

    work page doi:10.1039/d2sm01565j 2023

  35. [35]

    Pashine, D

    N. Pashine, D. Wang, J. Zhang, S. K. Patiballa, S. Witthaus, M. D. Shattuck, C. O'Hern, and R. Kramer-Bottiglio, Tessellated granular metamaterials with tunable elastic moduli, Extr. Mechan. Lett. 63, 102055 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2023.102055

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Zhang, D

    J. Zhang, D. Wang, W. Jin, A. Xia, N. Pashine, R. Kramer-Bottiglio, M. D. Shattuck, and C. S. O'Hern, Designing the pressure-dependent shear modulus using tessellated granular metamaterials, Phys. Rev. E 108 034901 (2023). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.034901

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.108.034901 2023

  37. [37]

    Anomalous Enhancement of Yield Strength due to Static Friction

    R. Suzuki, T. Matsushima, T. Yamaguchi, M. Tani, and S. Sasa, Anomalous Enhancement of Yield Strength due to Static Friction, arXiv:2511.06807 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.06807

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.06807

  38. [38]

    L. Z. Huang, Y. J. Wang, M. Q. Jiang, and M. Baggioli, Spotting structural defects in crystals from the topology of vibrational modes, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 204, 106274 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106274

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Baggioli, M

    M. Baggioli, M. Landry, and A. Zaccone, Deformations, relaxation, and broken symmetries in liquids, solids, and glasses: Aunified topological field theory, Phys. Rev. E 105, 024602 (2022) https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.024602

    doi:10.1103/physreve.105.024602 2022

  40. [40]

    Desmarchelier, S

    P. Desmarchelier, S. Fajardo, and M. L. Falk , Topological characterization of rearrangements in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. E 109, L053002 (2024). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.L053002

    doi:10.1103/physreve.109.l053002 2024

  41. [41]

    O. U. Salman, A. Ahadi, and L. Truskinovsky, Quasi-amorphous crystal, arXiv:2511.08187 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.08187

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.08187

  42. [42]

    Nakai, T

    F. Nakai, T. Uneyama, Y. Suzuki, K. Yoshii, and H. Katsuragi, Dislocation Glides in Granular Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 048202 (2025). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/7g7s-c157

    work page doi:10.1103/7g7s-c157 2025

  43. [43]

    M. C. Cross, and P. C. Hohenberg, Pattern formation outside of equilibrium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.65.851

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.851 1993

  44. [44]

    Manneville, Dissipative Structures and Weak Turbulence (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990)

    P. Manneville, Dissipative Structures and Weak Turbulence (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990)

    1990

  45. [45]

    Kuramoto Y, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

    Y. Kuramoto Y, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

    1984

  46. [46]

    Shukla, and M

    P. Shukla, and M. Alam, Landau-type Order Parameter Equation for Shear Banding in Granular Couette Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 068001 (2009). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.068001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.068001 2009

  47. [47]

    Saitoh, and H

    K. Saitoh, and H. Hayakawa, Weakly nonlinear analysis of two dimensional sheared granular flow Granular Matter, 13, 697 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-011-0283-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10035-011-0283-2 2011

  48. [48]

    I. S. Aranson, and L. S. Tsimring, Patterns and collective behavior in granular media: Theoretical concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 641 (2006). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.641

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.641 2006

  49. [49]

    Lerner, Micromechanics of nonlinear plastic modes, Phys

    E. Lerner, Micromechanics of nonlinear plastic modes, Phys. Rev. E. 93, 053004 (2016) https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.053004

    doi:10.1103/physreve.93.053004 2016

  50. [50]

    Richard, Connecting microscopic and mesoscopic mechanics in model structural glasses, J

    D. Richard, Connecting microscopic and mesoscopic mechanics in model structural glasses, J. Chem. Phys. 160 094113 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0195445

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0195445 2024

  51. [51]

    R. J. Speedy, Glass transition in hard disc mixtures, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4559 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478337

    work page doi:10.1063/1.478337 1999

  52. [52]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter, Springer (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32899-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32899-5 2008

  53. [53]

    L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Vibrations and Diverging Length Scales Near the Unjamming Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 098301 (2005). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.098301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.098301 2005

  54. [54]

    L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Normal modes in model jammed systems in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 79, 021308 (2009). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.021308

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.79.021308 2009

  55. [55]

    C. P. Goodrich, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Finite-Size Scaling at the Jamming Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 095704 (2012). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.095704

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.095704 2012

  56. [56]

    Tsamados, A

    M. Tsamados, A. Tanguy, C. Goldenberg, and Jean-Louis Barrat, Local elasticity map and plasticity in a model Lennard-Jones glass, Phys. Rev. E 80, 026112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026112

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.80.026112 2009

  57. [57]

    C. F. Schreck, T. Bertrand, C. S. O'Hern, and M. D. Shattuck, Repulsive Contact Interactions Make Jammed Particulate Systems Inherently Nonharmonic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 078301 (2011). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.078301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.078301 2011

  58. [58]

    Mizuno, M

    H. Mizuno, M. Shimada, and A. Ikeda, Anharmonic properties of vibrational excitations in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013215 (2020). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013215

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013215 2020

  59. [59]

    Boschan, S

    J. Boschan, S. Luding, and B. P. Tighe, Jamming and irreversibility, Granular Matter 21, 58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0911-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10035-019-0911-9 2019

  60. [60]

    M. S. van Deen, B. P. Tighe, and M. van Hecke, Contact changes of sheared systems: Scaling, correlations, and mechanisms, Phys. Rev. E 94, 062905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.062905

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.94.062905 2016

  61. [61]

    M. S. van Deen, J. Simon, Z. Zeravcic, S. Dagois-Bohy, B. P. Tighe, and M. van Hecke, Contact changes near jamming, Phys. Rev. E 90 020202 (2014). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.020202

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.020202 2014

  62. [62]

    J. D. Eshelby, The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 241, 376 (1957) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1957.0133

    arXiv 1957

  63. [63]

    Mura, Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, Springer Dordrecht (1987)

    T. Mura, Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, Springer Dordrecht (1987)

    1987

  64. [64]

    Weinberger, W

    C. Weinberger, W. Cai, and D. Barnett, Lecture Notes – Elasticity of Microscopic Structures, Lecture notes, ME340B, Stanford University, Winter 2004, Sept. 2005

    2004

  65. [65]

    Dasgupta, H

    R. Dasgupta, H. George E. Hentschel, and Itamar Procaccia, Yield strain in shear banding amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. E 87, 022810 (2013) https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022810

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.87.022810 2013

  66. [66]

    Lema\^itre, C

    A. Lema\^itre, C. Mondal, M. Moshe, I. Procaccia, S. Roy, and K. Screiber-Re'em, Anomalous elasticity and plastic screening in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. E 104, 024904 (2021). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024904

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.104.024904 2021

  67. [67]

    Charan, M

    H. Charan, M. Moshe, and I. Procaccia, Anomalous elasticity and emergent dipole screening in three-dimensional amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. E 107, 055005 (2023). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.055005

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.107.055005 2023

  68. [68]

    Kumar and I

    A. Kumar and I. Procaccia, Elasticity, plasticity and screening in amorphous solids: A short review, EPL 145, 26002 (2024). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/0295-5075/ad2087/

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ad2087/ 2024

  69. [69]

    M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987)

    1987

  70. [70]

    Bitzek, P

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. Gähler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, Structural Relaxation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97.170201 (2006). https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170201

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.170201 2006

  71. [71]

    W. G. Ellenbroek, M. van Hecke, and W. van Saarloos, Jammed frictionless disks: Connecting local and global response, Phys. Rev. E 80, 061307 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.061307

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.80.061307 2009