Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Combining color and polarization maps with dust modeling, this paper argues that comet 67P's 2021/22 coma was dominated by particles larger than 10 micrometers and that unusually high polarization points to changed dust properties since 201

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:58 UTC pith:DPKDV4QE

load-bearing objection Solid new 67P color/polarization maps from the 2021/22 apparition; the observational work is careful and worth having, but the >10 μm dust-size conclusion is model-dependent and the paper itself gives the reason. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20038 v1 pith:DPKDV4QE submitted 2026-07-22 astro-ph.EP

A comprehensive study of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in the 2021/2022 apparition. II. Colorimetry, polarimetry, modeling

Vera Rosenbush , Oleksandra Ivanova , Johannes Markkanen , Igor Lukyanyk , Valerii Kleshchonok , Ludmilla Kolokolova , Colin Snodgrass , Elena Shablovinskaya This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenkodust colorlinear polarizationBPCA aggregatescoma modelingdynamic sortingpolarimetric phase curveJupiter-family comet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors observed comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2021/22 through broadband color imaging and aperture polarimetry, then modeled the coma with light-scattering codes and Monte Carlo dust dynamics. They find that the dust was mostly large, fluffy aggregates larger than 10 micrometers, with smaller 1-10 micrometer grains appearing only in localized patches. The positive polarization at large phase angle was unusually high for a high-polarization comet, and the coma was unusually smooth, suggesting the dust changed after the 2015/16 apparition. If this is right, 67P's dust environment is not static between returns, and future apparitions can test whether the change is a trend.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the observed spatial gradients in color (red near the nucleus, bluer outward) and polarization (increasing with distance) are the signature of dynamic sorting of dust particles, not primarily of compositional zoning. Using ballistic particle-cluster aggregates made of equal parts silicates and processed organics, the model reproduces the observed maps only when particles larger than 10 micrometers dominate the scattering cross section at all distances; smaller grains in the 1-10 micrometer range are confined to small regions where polarization is locally enhanced. The same data show that the 2021/22 polarization exceeds the reference curve for high-polarization com

What carries the argument

The central object is the ballistic particle-cluster aggregate (BPCA), a fluffy dust grain built from sub-micron monomers, which reproduces the negative polarization branch. Light scattering is computed exactly with a fast superposition T-matrix method for small particles and with a Monte Carlo radiative-transfer solver for larger ones; a Monte Carlo dust-dynamics model adds gas drag, solar gravity, and radiation pressure. The dynamic-sorting mechanism - small grains accelerated faster and blown outward, large grains lingering near the nucleus and tail - is what turns a single size distribution into the observed spatial color and polarization pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The size conclusion depends on the assumed grain optics - specifically, a fairly absorbing mix of silicates and processed organics with a particular aggregate structure; if the grains are less absorbing, the polarization minimum shifts to much larger sizes and the 'small grains only in patches' reading loses its footing.

What would settle it

Simultaneous color and polarization imaging at an intermediate phase angle near 30 degrees would test the model's predicted size-color-polarization correlation; a mismatch in sign or magnitude would rule out the assumed grain optics. A mid-infrared spectrum checking for a strong 10-micrometer silicate feature would also test whether small silicate grains are actually abundant.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • In 2021/22, the coma's optical properties were mostly set by grains larger than 10 micrometers, so remote-sensing interpretations for this apparition should not assume a small-grain-dominated coma.
  • Local polarization enhancements are tracers of narrow regions with 1-10 micrometer grains or less-absorbing material, giving a way to map fine-grain enrichment from polarimetry alone.
  • The unusually high positive polarization places 67P at the upper end of high-polarization comets, which bears on how processed organic material is distributed in its dust.
  • Because the 2021/22 coma was smoother in color and polarization than the 2015/16 one, the change in dust properties between apparitions is a measurable, testable trend for future returns.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If future mid-infrared observations show a strong 10-micrometer silicate feature, the large-grain dominance would be hard to sustain; a weak feature would support the authors' interpretation. This is a direct, testable consequence of the paper's size claim.
  • The same combined light-scattering-plus-dynamics approach could be applied to other Jupiter-family comets with smooth comae; the paper's method effectively inverts color-polarization maps into a size-and-composition field.
  • The positive color-polarization correlation the authors see in the southern hemisphere suggests compositional (not purely size) variations; a mapping campaign at multiple phase angles could separate size from composition more cleanly than this single-return dataset allows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports new imaging colorimetry and linear polarimetry of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko obtained during the 2021/22 apparition, together with aperture polarimetry from two additional telescopes. The data show a red inner coma (g−r ≈ 0.8 mag) that becomes bluer with distance, and polarization of about 10–12% at α = 47.9° and about −1% to −2.5% at α = 10.5°, with a more homogeneous spatial distribution than in 2015/16. The authors model the observations with BPCA aggregates of equal-mass silicates and processed organics, using FaSTMM/SIRIS4 light scattering and a Monte Carlo dynamical dust model. They conclude that the coma is dominated by particles larger than 10 μm, that local polarization enhancements are due to 1–10 μm grains or less-absorbing material, and that the 2021/22 polarization exceeds the reference high-Pmax comet curve, suggesting a change in dust properties since 2015/16.

Significance. The observational dataset is valuable: the color and polarization maps are carefully reduced, gas contamination is estimated spectroscopically and found to be less than 10%, and the aperture polarimetry extends the phase-angle coverage of 67P across four apparitions. The modeling effort is sophisticated, combining asymptotically exact light-scattering computations with an explicit dynamical model, and the paper is transparent about most parameters. If the size inference held, it would be strong evidence for inter-apparition dust evolution. However, the central size conclusion rests on a specific assumed refractive index and aggregate morphology, and the paper's own Section 5.4 acknowledges an alternative that would remove the need for small grains. The model also fails to reproduce several observed features. The color/polarization maps themselves should be publishable; the size interpretation needs either sensitivity analysis or a more cautious statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.4, Fig. 8] The conclusion that the coma is dominated by >10 μm particles and that local polarization enhancements require 1–10 μm grains is directly contingent on the assumed refractive index (m=1.754+i0.157 at 440 nm, m=1.778+i0.133 at 650 nm) and BPCA morphology. The text itself notes that less-absorbing particles shift the polarization minimum to ~10–100 μm, which would make the outer-coma negative polarization consistent with large grains. Since this refractive index was selected to reproduce the aperture-averaged polarization, color, and albedo (Section 5.2), the inference is partly circular. A sensitivity analysis over a plausible range of complex refractive indices and porosities should be provided, or the claim should be explicitly re-phrased as conditional on this composition/morphology.
  2. [Section 5.4, radial profiles] The same section reports that the model overestimates the radial increase of polarization and underestimates the radial decrease of color, and cannot reproduce the 6 February 2022 negative polarization or the small-scale jet structures. Given these discrepancies, the fitted parameters (r_min=0.25 μm, power-law index −3.3, r_max=2.6 mm, ν=1.1, γ=0.175) are not strongly constrained. The paper should include quantitative residuals of the model versus observed radial profiles and discuss whether the imperfect fit biases the inferred size threshold.
  3. [Section 5.3–5.4, activity history] The dynamical model assumes continuous activity began 12 months before the observation and adopts Qgas ∝ rh^-6.5 from Rosetta's 2015/16 apparition. Since the observed coma is a convolution of the emission history with particle velocities and radiation pressure, the conclusion that only large particles remain in the tail depends on this assumption. A sensitivity test with different activity onset times and gas production scalings (or at least an explicit justification) is needed to establish that the >10 μm result is not an artifact of the assumed activity history.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.2] Typo: 'the resulting refractive using the Maxwell-Garnett mixing rule' should read 'the resulting refractive index using the Maxwell-Garnett mixing rule'.
  2. [Section 4.1] The phrase 'the polarization decreases sharply from ~1% near the nucleus to ~4%' is ambiguous for negative polarization; suggest 'the absolute value of the negative polarization increases from about 1% near the nucleus to 4%'.
  3. [Section 5.1] The sentence 'for particles larger than up to 1 cm' is awkward; suggest 'for particles up to 1 cm'.
  4. [Data availability] The statement 'Data will be made available on request' is weaker than standard practice; consider depositing the reduced maps and polarimetric tables in a permanent repository.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation found; the >10 μm dust-size conclusion is model-dependent and explicitly acknowledged as such, not a reduction to the model's inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: observed color/polarization maps -> light-scattering (FaSTMM/SIRIS4) and dynamical Monte Carlo models with assumed BPCA morphology, monomer size distribution, 50/50 silicate/organic composition, refractive index m=1.754+i0.157 (440 nm) and m=1.778+i0.133 (650 nm), and free dynamical and size-distribution parameters (nu, gamma, rmin, power-law index, rmax) fitted to the observations. The central claim that the coma is dominated by particles >10 um is read off the computed Fig. 8 saturation of color/polarization with size for the chosen model. This is an inverse-modeling inference, i.e., a fitted/assumption-dependent result, but it is not circular: no quantity is defined in terms of the target conclusion, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as an independent prediction. The paper itself flags the degeneracy in Section 5.4: 'One possible explanation is the presence of less absorbing particles, for which the polarization minimum shifts to larger sizes (~10-100 um), allowing the observations to be reconciled with the dynamical constraints.' That is an honest statement of model non-uniqueness (a correctness risk), not a circular reduction. Self-citations to the modeling codes and to prior apparition papers are methodological or data references and are not used as an unverified uniqueness theorem. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central size inference rests on the chosen BPCA morphology, the Maxwell-Garnett effective-medium refractive index, and the dynamical model's assumptions (spherical emission surface, cosine outgassing, Rosetta-derived gas production law, 12-month continuous activity). The light-scattering and dynamical parameters (r_min, power-law index, r_max, ν, γ) are fitted to the same color/polarization observations, so the 'prediction' that the coma is dominated by >10 μm particles is largely a re-description of the fitted model.

free parameters (5)
  • Effective refractive index of organic-silicate mixture = m = 1.754 + i0.157 (440 nm); m = 1.778 + i0.133 (650 nm)
    Chosen so the BPCA model reproduces the observed aperture-averaged polarization phase curve, color, and geometric albedo (Section 5.2).
  • Minimum particle size r_min = 0.25 μm
    Set to match the outer-coma color index of ~0.2 mag (Section 5.4).
  • Power-law index of size distribution = -3.3
    Best fit to aperture-averaged polarization and color (Section 5.4).
  • Maximum particle size r_max = 2.6 mm
    Constrained by the observed tail profile (Section 5.4).
  • Gas-drag velocity parameters ν, γ = ν = 1.1, γ = 0.175
    Control the coma shape and dust number density; fitted in the dynamical model (Section 5.4).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Dust particles are moderately porous BPCA aggregates of spherical monomers with log-normal size distribution (mean 50 nm, σ = 30 nm)
    Assumed particle morphology used throughout the modeling (Section 5.1). Justified by MIDAS monomer sizes and the shape of the negative polarization branch, but not uniquely constrained.
  • domain assumption Refractive index of the mixture follows Maxwell-Garnett mixing with 50/50 organics/silicates
    Effective-medium approximation used to compute m = 1.754 + i0.157 and m = 1.778 + i0.133 (Sections 5.1–5.2).
  • domain assumption Dust emission follows a cosine law from a spherical surface of radius 10 km with no night-side emission, and gas production ∝ r_h^−6.5
    Dynamical model assumptions in Section 5.3, based on Rosetta-era scaling; load-bearing for the size sorting that underlies the >10 μm conclusion.
  • ad hoc to paper Continuous activity began 12 months before the observation date
    Assumed activity history in Section 5.4 for the Monte Carlo dynamical simulations; if activity started later, the size segregation pattern changes.
  • domain assumption The approximate Monte Carlo radiative transfer solver SIRIS4 is valid for particles >5 μm
    Used for particles up to 1 cm because the exact FaSTMM method is computationally prohibitive (Section 5).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25137 in / 16078 out tokens · 133616 ms · 2026-08-01T10:58:32.612805+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A comprehensive study of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in the 2021/2022 apparition. II. Colorimetry, polarimetry, modeling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPKDV4QE

@misc{pith2026260720038,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A comprehensive study of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in the 2021/2022 apparition. II. Colorimetry, polarimetry, modeling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPKDV4QE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20038}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper presents the second part of our multi-technique observational study of comet 67P during its 2021-2022 apparition. While the first paper focused on photometry and spectroscopy, here we investigate the dust color and linear polarization of the coma. Imaging in the g-sdss and r-sdss filters was obtained with the 6-m BTA SAO Telescope, and aperture polarimetry was performed with the 2.6-m Shajn Telescope (CrAO) and the 2-m RCC Telescope. Observations at phase angles of 47.9 deg (6 October 2021) and 10.5 deg (6 February 2022) show negative polarization of about 0.5-2.5% at 10.5 deg and positive polarization of about 11% at 47.9 deg. The dust color was red, reaching about 0.8 mag near the nucleus and in the tail, and decreasing to about 0.2 mag in the coma and jet within 20,000 km of the nucleus. Spatial maps reveal a gradual decrease in color index and a corresponding increase in polarization with distance from the nucleus. Numerical modeling using ballistic particle-cluster aggregates composed of equal fractions of silicates and organics indicates that the coma is dominated by particles larger than 10 micrometers, while local polarization enhancements are consistent with regions containing smaller (1-10 micrometer) grains. Combining our aperture measurements with published data from four previous apparitions confirms that comet 67P belongs to the high-polarization class. The unusually high positive polarization observed during the 2021/22 apparition, together with the relatively isotropic coma morphology, suggests that the dust properties may have changed after the 2015/16 apparition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20038 by Colin Snodgrass, Elena Shablovinskaya, Igor Lukyanyk, Johannes Markkanen, Ludmilla Kolokolova, Oleksandra Ivanova, Valerii Kleshchonok, Vera Rosenbush.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The left panel shows the (g–r) color map of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko acquired on 6 October 2021 with superimposed isophotes differing by a factor of √2 in color index. The map is colored according to the (g-r) color index in magnitudes as indicated by the bars at the top of the image. Additionally, the image is color-enhanced to increase contrast. In the right panel, the black line represents the cr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel (a): Color map highlighting areas with the highest color index values. The color bar at the top of the image shows the color index in magnitudes. (b): Color map after applying a simple rotational-gradient digital filter. The color bar at the top indicates local increases or decreases in the color index in magnitudes. (c): Color map after applying the asymmetry digital filter, with the dashed line ind… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Linear polarization maps of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko obtained with the 6-m telescope. The left panel shows the spatial distribution of the polarization degree over the comet on 6 October 2021 in the r-sdss filter, while the right panel shows the observations from 6 February 2022 in the R filter. The color images represent the polarization values, with the corresponding scale bars in percent shown at… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of polarization across the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko for 31 days before perihelion (6 October 2021, left panel) and 96 days after perihelion (6 February 2022, right panel). The individual curves represent scans measured from the optocenter of the comet in different directions. In panel (a), the black line corresponds to the cut along the tail in the direction PA = 266◦, the red l… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Polarization of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko as a function of phase angle for different apparitions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An illustration of a BPCA aggregate made out of 2048 monomers (left) and the histogram of its monomer sizes (right). 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the computed polarization phase curves for different particle sizes, together with the observed aperture-averaged polariza￾tion degree of 67P/C–G reported by Gray et al., 2024. To investigate spatial structures in the coma, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Modeled polarization and color as a function of aggregate size for the phase angles of 10.5◦ and 48◦ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the simulated particle number densities for six repre￾sentative particle sizes, assuming that continuous activity began 12 months before the observation. It clearly demonstrates the dynamic sorting effect, which produces a spatially varying particle size distribution within the coma (Agarwal et al., 2024). Small particles are rapidly accelerated by gas drag and are strongly affected by radiation pres… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Simulated color and polarization maps of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko on 6 October 2021, as well as extracted slices along and perpendicular to the negative velocity vector of the nucleus. color increases and polarization increases with decreasing particle size. Thus, observations are consistent with a decrease in particle size caused by the dynamic sorting effect. The color index at the outer edge of … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [11]

    Imaging polarimetry of comet 67P/ Churyumov–Gerasimenko: homogeneous distribution of polarization and its implications. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 1638–1652. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2405.09297. Groussin, O., Attree, N., Brouet, Y., et al.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.09297

  2. [18]

    Icarus 277, 257–278

    The global shape, density and rotation of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from preperihelion Rosetta/OSIRIS observations. Icarus 277, 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.05.002. Keller, H.U., Mottola, S., Hviid, S.F., et al.,

    doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.05.002 2016

  3. [19]

    Seasonal mass transfer on the nucleus of comet 67P/Chuyumov–Gerasimenko. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, S357–S371. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1726. Kelley, M.S., Woodward, C.E., Harker, D.E., et al.,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1726

  4. [24]

    Interaction of Electromagnetic Radiation with Cometary Dust

    Interaction of electromagnetic radiation with cometary dust. In: Comets III. Arizona University Press, pp. 621–652. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.03117. Kwon, Y.G., Bagnulo, S., Markkanen, J., et al.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.03117

  5. [25]

    VLT spectropolarimetry of comet 67P: dust environment around the end of its intense southern summer. Astron. Astrophys. 657, A40. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141865. Larson, S.M., Sekanina, Z.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141865

  6. [27]

    The gas production of 14 species from comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko based on DFMS/COPS data from 2014 to

    2014

  7. [28]

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, 3995–4004. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ staa2643. Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., Agarwal, J., Cottin, H., et al.,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/

  8. [30]

    Dust of comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko collected by Rosetta/ MIDAS: classification and extension to the nanometer scale. Astron. Astrophys. 630, A26. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201834851. Markkanen, J., Yuffa, A.J.,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/

  9. [31]

    Fast superposition T-matrix solution for clusters with arbitrarily-shaped constituent particles. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 189, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.11.004. Markkanen, J., Agarwal, J., V¨ais¨anen, T., Penttil¨a, A., Muinonen, K.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.11.004 2016

  10. [32]

    Astrophys

    Interpretation of the phase functions measured by the OSIRIS instrument for comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Astrophys. J. Let. 868, L16. https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aaee10. Myers, R.V., Nordsieck, K.H.,

    2041

  11. [34]

    Spatial variations of brightness, colour and polarization of dust in comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, S475–S491. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2003. Rosenbush, V., Ivanova, O., Kleshchonok, V., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2003

  12. [35]

    Imaging photometry and long-slit spectroscopy

    Comet 2P/Encke in apparitions of 2013 and 2017: I. Imaging photometry and long-slit spectroscopy. Icarus 348, 113767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113767. Rosenbush, V., Kleshchonok, V., Ivanova, O., et al.,

    arXiv 2013

  13. [39]

    Science 347, aaa1044

    On the nucleus structure and activity of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. Science 347, aaa1044. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.aaa1044. Stinson, A., Bagnulo, S., Tozzi, G.P., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa1044

  14. [40]

    Polarimetry of comets 67P/ Churyumov–Gerasimenko, 74P/Smirnova–Chernykh, and 152P/Helin–Lawrence. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A110. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527696. Thomas, N., Davidsson, B., Jorda, L., Kührt, E., Marschall, R., Snodgrass, C., Rodrigo, R. (Eds.),

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527696

  15. [41]

    Proceedings of SPIE Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VII

    SALT and SAAO strategy, focusing on the time-domain: process, plans, and challenges. Proceedings of SPIE Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VII. 107040A. https://doi.org/ 10.1117/12.2313272. Willmer, C.N.A.,

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2313272

  16. [42]

    Astrophys

    The absolute magnitude of the sun in several filters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 236, 47, 14 pp. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aabfdf. Agarwal, J., Kim, Y., Kelley, M., Marschall, R.,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aabfdf

  17. [43]

    In: Meech, K.J., et al

    Dust emission and dynamics. In: Meech, K.J., et al. (Eds.), Comets III. University of Arizona Press, pp. 653–678. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816553631-ch020. Attree, N., Guti´errez, P., Schuckart, C., et al.,

    doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816553631-ch020

  18. [44]

    Icarus 425, 116300

    Geometrical model of jets in cometary comae. Icarus 425, 116300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116300. Kleshchonok, V., Sierks, H., Güttler, C.,

    arXiv 2024

  19. [347]

    https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aaa0276 id. aaa0276. Ivanova, O.V., Rosenbush, V.K., Kiselev, N.N., et al., 2017a. Post-perihelion observations of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko at the 6 m BTA telescope: optical spectroscopy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, S386–S395. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stx1725. Ivanova, O., Rosenbush, V., Afanasiev, V., et a...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016 2009

  20. [1910]

    Astron. J. 89, 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1086/113551. L¨auter, M., Kramer, T., Rubin, M., Altwegg, K.,

    work page doi:10.1086/113551

  21. [1982]

    Astrophys

    On standard polarized stars. Astrophys. J. 262, 732–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/160467. Chernova, G.P., Kiselev, N.N., Jockers, K.,

    work page doi:10.1086/160467

  22. [1984]

    Icarus 58, 431–439

    Spectropolarimetry of comets Austin and Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Icarus 58, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035 (84)90088-5. Rosenbush, V.K., Ivanova, O.V., Kiselev, N.N., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035

  23. [1992]

    The Hubble space telescope northern- hemisphere grid of stellar polarimetric standards. Astron. J. 104, 1563–1567. https://doi.org/10.1086/116341. Schulz, R., Stüwe, J.A., Boehnhardt, H.,

    doi:10.1086/116341

  24. [1993]

    Icarus 103, 144–158

    Polarimetric characteristics of dust particles as observed in 13 comets: comparisons with asteroids. Icarus 103, 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1993.1063. Dahlen, D., Kwon, Y.G., Masiero, J.R., et al.,

    arXiv 1993

  25. [2000]

    Icarus 147, 180–204

    The HB narrowband comet filters: standardizing calibration and analysis techniques. Icarus 147, 180–204. https://doi. org/10.1006/icar.2000.6420. Fornasier, S., Hasselmann, P.H., Barucci, M.A., et al.,

    arXiv 2000

  26. [2004]

    Rosetta target comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko Postperihelion gas and dust production rates. Astron. Astrophys. 422, L19–L21. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20040190. Serkowski, K.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040190

  27. [2006]

    Astrophys

    A Spitzer study of comets 2P/ Encke, 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, and C/2001 HT50 (LINEAR-NEAT). Astrophys. J. 651, 1256–1271. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0607416. Kiselev, N., Rosenbush, V., Levasseur-Regourd, A., Kolokolova, L.,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0607416 2001

  28. [2007]

    Two different evolutionary types of comets proved by polarimetric and infrared properties of their dust. Astron. Astrophys. 463, 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065069. Kolokolova, L., Kelley, M.S., Kimura, H., Hoang, T.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065069

  29. [2010]

    Astrophys

    Astron. Astrophys. 517, A86. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014167. Hadamcik, E., Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., Hines, D.C., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014167

  30. [2011]

    SCORPIO on the 6m telescope: current state and perspectives for spectroscopy of galactic and extragalactic objects. Balt. Astron. 20, 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1515/astro-2017-0305. Afanasiev, V.L., Rosenbush, V.K., Kiselev, N.N.,

    doi:10.1515/astro-2017-0305 2017

  31. [2012]

    Astrophys

    Technique of polarimetric observations of faint objects at the 6-m BTA telescope. Astrophys. Bull. 67, 438–448. https://doi. org/10.1134/S1990341312040074. Afanasiev, V.L., Moiseev, A.V.,

    work page doi:10.1134/s1990341312040074

  32. [2014]

    Astrophys

    Polarimetry of major Uranian moons at the 6-m telescope. Astrophys. Bull. 69, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1990341314020096. V. Rosenbush et al. 14 activity model on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1040. Bardyn, A., Baklouti, D., Cottin, H., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1040

  33. [2015]

    Spectrophotometric properties of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from the OSIRIS instrument onboard the ROSETTA spacecraft. Astron. Astrophys. 583, A30, 18 pp. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525901. Gray, Z., Bagnulo, S., Boehnhardt, H., et al.,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525901

  34. [2016]

    Properties of dust particles in comets from photometric and polarimetric observations of 67P. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. S507–S515. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx030. H¨assig, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, et al.,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx030

  35. [2017]

    Carbon-rich dust in comet 67P/Chur - yumov-Gerasimenko measured by COSIMA/Rosetta. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, S712–S722. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2640. Boehnhardt, H., Lara, L., Gray, Z., Bagnulo, S.,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2640

  36. [2018]

    Space Sci

    Cometary dust. Space Sci. Rev. 214, 64, 56 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0496-3. Li, A., Greenberg, J.M.,

    doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0496-3

  37. [2019]

    Space Sci

    The thermal, mechanical, structural, and dielectric properties of cometary nuclei after Rosetta. Space Sci. Rev. 215, 29, 51 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-019-0594-x. Hadamcik, E., Sen, A.K., Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., et al.,

    doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0594-x

  38. [2021]

    Observations of distant comet C/ 2011 KP36 (Spacewatch): photometry, spectroscopy, and polarimetry. Astron. Astrophys. 651, A29. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039668. Ivanova, O., Rosenbush, V., Luk'yanyk, I., et al.,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039668 2011

  39. [2022]

    New polarimetric data for the Galilean satellites: Europa observations and modeling. Planet. Sci. J. 3, 134, 13 pp. https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ac6bef. Churyumov –Gerasimenko during increased activity at perihelion on 2015 august 22–23. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 542, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ staf1077. Kolokolova, L., Jockers, K., Gustafson,...

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac6bef 2015

  40. [2023]

    Quasi-simultaneous photometric, polarimetric, and spectral observations of distant comet C/2014 B1 (Schwartz). Astron. Astrophys. 672, A76. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244686. Jenniskens, P.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244686 2014

  41. [2024]

    Coma and tail of comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko during the 2021-2022 apparition. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 3912–3926. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1412. Hsu, J.C., Breger, V.,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1412 2021

  42. [2025]

    arXiv:2509.04666 astro-ph.EP

    Kete: predicting known minor bodies in images. arXiv:2509.04666 astro-ph.EP. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2509.04666. Dorschner, J., Begemann, B., Henning, Th., et al.,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.04666

  43. [2026]

    A comprehensive study of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in the 2021/2022 apparition. I. Photometry, spectroscopy, morphology. Icarus 444, 116799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. icarus.2025.116799. Schmidt, G.D., Elston, R., Lupie, O.L.,

    arXiv 2021