Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Two-photon-polymerized micro-optics can survive and operate reliably in telescope environments over six years.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:21 UTC pith:J4KSNJU4

load-bearing objection Genuinely useful six-year durability dataset, but the 'functioning as in 2019' claim is stronger than the normalized relative-response data can support. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20244 v1 pith:J4KSNJU4 submitted 2026-07-22 astro-ph.IM

Long-term performance of the MLR-TT sensor: two-photon polymerization validation in the telescope environment

Robert J. Harris , Philipp Hottinger , Jonathan Crass , Philipp-Immanuel Dietrich , Christian Koos This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords two-photon polymerizationmicrolens ring tip-tilt sensorfiber couplinglong-term performancetelescope instrumentationenvironmental reliabilityrelative responsesingle-mode fiber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Two-photon polymerization can print microscopic optical components with shapes impossible to machine conventionally, but telescopes are a harsh, unregulated environment. This paper reports that a microlens ring tip-tilt sensor made this way, installed at a large observatory in 2019, still produces the same relative response pattern in 2026 after humidity, temperature swings, vibration, and dust exposure. The authors' claim is that TPP micro-optics can survive and operate reliably in observatory environments for instrument-scale lifetimes. They demonstrate this through six years of repeated circular scans of the fiber outputs, normalized to remove changes in the upstream light source. The practical payoff is that TPP could be trusted for future astronomical instruments.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that two-photon-polymerized micro-optics maintain their optical performance after six years of continuous exposure to a telescope environment. The evidence is the MLR-TT sensor, a 355-micron-diameter ring of six microlenses printed by TPP and mounted over six multimode fibers surrounding a central science fiber. Between November 2019 and June 2026, the authors repeatedly scanned the sensor with a controllable tip/tilt mirror and measured how the calibration light distributes among the six fibers. After normalizing each scan to the total flux to compensate for different light sources, the response curves are essentially unchanged across all epochs. Two scans show

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the MLR-TT sensor itself: a ring of six microlenses fabricated by two-photon polymerization, 355 microns in diameter and 400 microns tall, mounted above six multimode fibers arranged around a central single-mode science fiber. As the incoming beam tilts, the fraction of light entering each multimode fiber changes, producing a characteristic response curve for each fiber as the beam is scanned in a circle. The comparison method is the other critical piece: because the telescope front end was upgraded several times, absolute coupling efficiency could not be compared across years, so the authors normalized every epoch's scan to its total flux. This turns the six fi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the normalized relative response of the six multimode fibers is a complete proxy for sensor health; any degradation that lowers all fiber outputs equally would leave this fingerprint unchanged and would go unnoticed.

What would settle it

Measure the absolute optical throughput of the sensor's central and multimode fibers immediately before and after its planned removal from the telescope in 2026, comparing to the 2019 baseline. If the normalized scans look healthy but the absolute coupling efficiency has dropped significantly, the conclusion that telescope-site degradation did not affect the sensor would be overturned.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • TPP micro-optics can be specified for instruments that must operate unattended for years, since the demonstrated environment includes the full range of telescope-site conditions.
  • The sensing scheme—a microlens ring with multimode fibers—can be considered a tested building block for future tip-tilt sensors in fiber-fed spectrographs.
  • Future TPP components for astronomy need not be confined to laboratory-tested cryogenic or vacuum conditions; normal observatory humidity and thermal cycling are also survivable.
  • The consistency of the relative response supports the stability of the TPP material itself, not just the particular mounting, against the main suspected degradation mechanisms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the measurements are normalized per epoch, a degradation that uniformly reduced the throughput of all six fibers (for example, a thin transparent contamination layer on the microlenses) would be invisible; the 'functioning as in 2019' claim rests on relative response only.
  • The phase shifts seen in January 2024 and June 2026 in fibers 2 and 5 are explained as camera misalignment without independent verification; a future measurement with a deliberately misaligned camera could confirm this attribution.
  • The six-year result applies to this specific printed geometry and material; other TPP designs may have different failure modes, so the demonstration is a necessary but not sufficient condition for general TPP reliability.
  • If the 2026 teardown finds no measurable surface aging, it would strengthen the case that TPP parts can outlast a typical instrument design cycle; if it finds contamination or crazing, the field would need accelerated-environment testing to set lifetime limits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports six years of in-situ monitoring (2019–2026) of a two-photon-polymerized microlens ring tip-tilt sensor (MLR-TT) installed in the iLocater acquisition camera at the Large Binocular Telescope. The sensor couples a central science fiber and six surrounding multimode fibers; a circular scan of a calibration beam produces a relative intensity response as a function of beam position. The paper compares these normalized responses across epochs, finds that the curves are visually similar apart from phase shifts in two fibers during two epochs, and concludes that TPP-fabricated micro-optics can survive and operate reliably in observatory environments. The authors explicitly defer full validation to post-removal laboratory inspection.

Significance. If the relative-response stability is robust, this is a valuable dataset: it is, to the authors' knowledge, the longest continuous on-telescope deployment of a TPP optical component, and it provides evidence that humidity, thermal cycling, vibrations, and contamination do not alter the differential response of the six sensing fibers. However, the significance is limited by the paper's own normalization: the data cannot constrain uniform throughput loss (e.g., contamination or surface aging), and the conclusions overstate what the evidence supports. The paper is therefore a useful engineering report, but its central claim as currently worded is not supported by the measurements. It needs revision of the conclusions and a quantitative analysis of the observed response curves.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Fig. 4; §4] The central conclusion "still attached to its fiber and functioning as in 2019" and "can survive and operate reliably" is not supported by the data because every measurement is normalized to total flux (§3: "All results are normalized to account for differing flux..."). Any degradation that reduces throughput uniformly across all fibers—contamination, coating aging, a uniform mechanical shift—is invisible in normalized relative response. The discussion acknowledges that absolute comparisons are impossible (§4), but the conclusions nevertheless make an absolute claim. Please either provide an absolute throughput proxy (even coarse) or explicitly limit the claim to relative response stability.
  2. [§3, Fig. 4] The comparison of the six-year response curves is purely visual. No error bars, RMS residuals, correlation coefficients, or goodness-of-fit metrics are reported. The figure legend asserts similarity, and the phase shifts for fibers 2 and 5 in Jan 2024 and June 2026 are visible, but there is no quantitative measure of shape consistency. To support a claim of "consistent performance," please add a per-fiber statistical comparison of the normalized scans, e.g., RMS deviation relative to the 2019 baseline as a function of epoch.
  3. [§3] The phase shifts in fibers 2 and 5 are attributed to "a misalignment in one axis with respect the iLocater acquisition camera" without independent verification. This is a load-bearing interpretation: if the shifts are instead caused by deformation or displacement of the microlens ring, they would contradict the stability claim. The paper should provide supporting evidence—for example, a simultaneous measurement of the camera/sensor alignment, a model of how a known camera misalignment produces exactly those phase shifts, or at minimum an explicit statement that this attribution is a hypothesis and not a verified diagnosis.
  4. [§4; §5] The paper states, "A full validation of the system will be conducted once the MLT-TT sensor has been removed from the telescope." This is an admission that the present in-situ data are insufficient for the strong conclusion drawn in §5. The conclusion should be reframed as provisional: the relative response has remained stable to the precision of normalized comparisons, while absolute throughput and structural integrity await laboratory inspection. As written, the conclusion overstates the evidence and cannot be accepted without revision.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: "polmerized" should be "polymerized" (also appears in §1 and §5: "polmerization").
  2. [§4] Typo: "degredation" should be "degradation".
  3. [§4] In the final sentence, "MLT-TT" should be "MLR-TT" (sensor acronym inconsistency).
  4. [§5] Phrase "microlens ring tip-tilt sensor sensor" contains a duplicated word.
  5. [§2.2 / Fig. 3] The schematic in Fig. 3 is not explained in enough detail to reproduce the measurement geometry; in particular, the role of the second dichroic and the exact beam path to the MLR-TT could be clarified. Also, "dichrioic" is a typo.
  6. [Fig. 4] The figure would benefit from explicit plotting of per-fiber panels or colors that match the six fibers, and from listing the exact scan dates in the legend. As it is, the reader must infer which curve corresponds to which fiber based on the phase structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the paper is an observational longevity report whose acknowledged normalization limits the claim; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is an observational monitoring report rather than a derivation: there is no first-principles model whose output is fed back as an input. The central evidence is the repeated normalized relative-response scans of the six multimode fibers (Fig. 4). The normalization 'to account for differing flux from the differing light sources' does make absolute-throughput degradation invisible, but the paper explicitly acknowledges this limitation—'making absolute comparisons between measurements impossible, thus we only test the relative response'—and does not present absolute-efficiency stability as a measured result. The statement that the sensor is 'still attached and functioning as in 2019' is an interpretation of the stable relative-response pattern; it is underdetermined by the data, not definitionally forced. The design references [5,6] are self-authored contextual citations for the sensor construction and prior on-sky results; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole evidence for the six-year stability. The phase shifts in Jan 2024 and June 2026 are attributed to camera misalignment without independent verification, but that is a correctness risk, not a circularity. The paper also defers final validation to post-removal laboratory inspection ('A full validation of the system will be conducted once the MLT-TT sensor has been removed from the telescope'), consistent with the limited in-situ data. No circular step meeting the required standard—where a result is equivalent to its input by construction, or a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction—can be identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters are fitted; the paper uses visual comparison of normalized curves. The load-bearing assumptions concern what the normalization hides and the post-hoc attribution of phase shifts. No new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Normalized relative fiber response is a sufficient proxy for all relevant degradation at LBT
    §2.2 and §3: each epoch is normalized to total flux, so uniform throughput losses are undetectable; the central conclusion depends on this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The phase shifts in fibers 2 and 5 are due to iLocater camera misalignment, not sensor degradation
    §3: "We ascribe this to a misalignment in one axis with respect the iLocater acquisition camera." No independent measurement of camera misalignment is provided.
  • domain assumption The listed environmental stressors (humidity, thermal variation, contamination, vibrations) would alter the relative shape of the response curves
    §4: if a stressor affected all fibers equally, the normalized relative response would not change and the test would miss it.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 3204 in / 9522 out tokens · 77006 ms · 2026-08-01T10:21:09.001547+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We report on the long-term optical performance of a two-photon polmerized microlens ring tip-tilt sensor. The study is backed by repeated measurements over the last six years, since the sensor was first tested in the sky at the Large Binocular Telescope. The goal of the study is to assess the feasibility of the underlying technology of two-photon polymerization for future instrumentation in the realistic environments experienced at astronomical telescopes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20244 by Christian Koos, Jonathan Crass, Philipp Hottinger, Philipp-Immanuel Dietrich, Robert J. Harris.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A camera image of the MLR-TT as installed in the iLocater acquisition camera. The MLR-TT was created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic of the MLR-TT sensor. On the left we show the aligned sensor, with the majority of the light coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the experimental setup. Here collimated calibration light (a) is supplied into the system. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The measured output intensity at each multimode fiber during circular scans of the incident beam. The dates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Allington-Smith and Robert Content and Roger Haynes and Ian J

    Jeremy R. Allington-Smith and Robert Content and Roger Haynes and Ian J. Lewis , title =. Proc.SPIE , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  2. [2]

    and King, David and Zhao, Bo and Reynolds, Robert and Hinz, Phil and Brooks, Jack and Bechter, Eric , booktitle =

    Bechter, Andrew and Crass, Jonathan and Ketterer, Ryan and Crepp, Justin R. and King, David and Zhao, Bo and Reynolds, Robert and Hinz, Phil and Brooks, Jack and Bechter, Eric , booktitle =. doi:10.1117/12.2188426 , editor =. arXiv , arxivId =:1509.05103 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    and Reynolds, Robert O

    Bechter, Andrew and Crass, Jonathan and Ketterer, Ryan and Crepp, Justin R. and Reynolds, Robert O. and Bechter, Eric and Hinz, Philip and Pedichini, Fernando and Foley, Michael and Runburg, Elliott and Onuma, Eleanya E. and Gaudi, Scott and Micela, Giuseppina and Pagano, Isabella and Woodward, Charles E. , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:1609.04410 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1117/12.790120 , file =

    Beuzit, Jean-Luc and Feldt, Markus and Dohlen, Kjetil and Mouillet, David and Puget, Pascal and Wildi, Francois and Abe, Lyu and Antichi, Jacopo and Baruffolo, Andrea and Baudoz, Pierre and Boccaletti, Anthony and Carbillet, Marcel and Charton, Julien and Claudi, Riccardo and Downing, Mark and Fabron, Christophe and Feautrier, Philippe and Fedrigo, Enrico...

  5. [5]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    B. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1012 , file =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1012

  6. [6]

    and Naranjo, V

    Brix, M. and Naranjo, V. and Beckmann, U. and Bertram, R. and Bertram, T. and Brynnel, J. and Egner, S. and Gaessler, W. and Herbst, T.M. and Kuerster, M. and Rohloff, R.R. and Rost, S. and Schmidt, J. , doi =. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering , keywords =

  7. [7]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Crass, J and Bechter, A and Sands, B and King, D and Ketterer, R and Engstrom, M and Hamper, R and Kopon, D and Smous, J and Crepp, J R and Montoya, M and Durney, O and Cavalieri, D and Reynolds, R and Vansickle, M and Onuma, E and Thomes, J and Mullin, S and Shelton, C and Wallace, K and Bechter, E and Vaz, A and Power, J and Rahmer, G and Ertel, S , tit...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3355 2021

  8. [8]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI , volume=

    iLocater: a diffraction-limited Doppler spectrometer for the Large Binocular Telescope , author=. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI , volume=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  9. [9]

    and Jovanovic, N

    Cvetojevic, N. and Jovanovic, N. and Gross, S. and Norris, B. and Spaleniak, I. and Schwab, C. and Withford, M. J. and Ireland, M. and Tuthill, P. and Guyon, O. and Martinache, F. and Lawrence, J. S. , doi =. Optics Express , month =. arXiv , arxivId =:1707.02116 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    and Blaicher, Matthias and Corrigan, Mark K

    Dietrich, Philipp-Immanuel and Harris, Robert J. and Blaicher, Matthias and Corrigan, Mark K. and Morris, Tim J. and Freude, Wolfgang and Quirrenbach, Andreas and Koos, Christian , doi =. Optics Express , month =

  11. [11]

    and Blaicher, M

    Dietrich, P.-I. and Blaicher, M. and Reuter, I. and Billah, M. and Hoose, T. and Hofmann, A. and Caer, C. and Dangel, R. and Offrein, B. and Troppenz, U. and Moehrle, M. and Freude, W. and Koos, C. , doi =. Nature Photonics , mendeley-groups =. arXiv , arxivId =:1802.00051 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Eisenstein and D

    G. Eisenstein and D. Vitello , journal =. Chemically etched conical microlenses for coupling single-mode lasers into single-mode fibers , volume =. 1982 , url =. doi:10.1364/AO.21.003470 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.21.003470 1982

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1117/12.290159 , editor =

    Esposito, Simone and Marchetti, Enrico and Ragazzoni, Roberto and Baruffolo, Andrea and Farinato, Jacopo and Fini, Luca and Ghedina, Adriano and Ranfagni, Piero and Riccardi, Armando , booktitle =. doi:10.1117/12.290159 , editor =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.290159

  14. [14]

    and Riccardi, A

    Esposito, S. and Riccardi, A. and Pinna, E. and Puglisi, A. and Quir. doi:10.1117/12.898641 , editor =. arXiv , arxivId =:1203.2761 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =

    Gl. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa632b , file =

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa632b

  16. [16]

    Guyon, O. , doi =. Astronomy. arXiv , arxivId =:0603713 , file =

  17. [17]

    Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =

    Halverson, Samuel and Roy, Arpita and Mahadevan, Suvrath and Schwab, Christian , doi =. Astrophysical Journal Letters , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1511.02856 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    and Bailey, V

    Hinz, Phil and Arbo, P. and Bailey, V. and Connors, T. and Durney, O. and Esposito, Simone and Hoffmann, W. and Jones, T. and Leisenring, J. and Montoya, M. and Nash, M. and Nelson, M. and McMahon, T. and Pinna, E. and Puglisi, A. and Skemer, A. and Skrutskie, M. and Vaitheeswaran, V. , doi =

  19. [19]

    Harris and Philipp-Immanuel Dietrich and Matthias Blaicher and Martin Gl

    Philipp Hottinger and Robert J. Harris and Philipp-Immanuel Dietrich and Matthias Blaicher and Martin Gl. Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation III , editor =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  20. [20]

    Harris and Jonathan Crass and Philipp-Immanuel Dietrich and Matthias Blaicher and Andrew Bechter and Brian Sands and Timothy Morris and Alastair G

    Philipp Hottinger and Robert J. Harris and Jonathan Crass and Philipp-Immanuel Dietrich and Matthias Blaicher and Andrew Bechter and Brian Sands and Timothy Morris and Alastair G. Basden and Nazim Ali Bharmal and Jochen Heidt and Theodoros Anagnos and Philip L. Neureuther and Martin Gl\". On-sky results for the integrated microlens ring tip-tilt sensor , ...

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.421459 2021

  21. [21]

    and Martinache, F

    Jovanovic, N. and Martinache, F. and Guyon, O. and Clergeon, C. and Singh, G. and Kudo, T. and Garrel, V. and Newman, K. and Doughty, D. and Lozi, J. and Males, J. and Minowa, Y. and Hayano, Y. and Takato, N. and Morino, J. and Kuhn, J. and Serabyn, E. and Norris, B. and Tuthill, P. and Schworer, G. and Stewart, P. and Close, L. and Huby, E. and Perrin, G...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    and Cvetojevic, N

    Jovanovic, N. and Cvetojevic, N. and Norris, B. and Betters, C. and Schwab, C. and Lozi, J. and Guyon, O. and Gross, S. and Martinache, F. and Tuthill, P. and Doughty, D. and Minowa, Y. and Takato, N. and Lawrence, J. , doi =. arXiv , arxivId =:1707.01847 , file =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Macintosh, Bruce and Graham, James R. and Ingraham, Patrick and Konopacky, Quinn and Marois, Christian and Perrin, Marshall and Poyneer, Lisa and Bauman, Brian and Barman, Travis and Burrows, Adam and Cardwell, Andrew and Chilcote, Jeffrey and. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304215111 , eprint =

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1304215111

  24. [24]

    Advanced Science , volume =

    O'Halloran, Seán and Pandit, Abhay and Heise, Andreas and Kellett, Andrew , title =. Advanced Science , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202204072 , url =. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/advs.202204072 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202204072

  25. [25]

    and Ward, Jacob and Bankson, Stephen and Shah, Archit and Sellers, John A

    Peek, Sherman E. and Ward, Jacob and Bankson, Stephen and Shah, Archit and Sellers, John A. and Adams, Mark L. and Hamilton, Michael C. , title =. MRS Communications , year =

  26. [26]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , year = 2010, series =

    ESPRESSO: the Echelle spectrograph for rocky exoplanets and stable spectroscopic observations. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , year = 2010, series =. doi:10.1117/12.857122 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/12.857122 2010

  27. [27]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Laser micromachining of efficient fiber microlenses , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  28. [28]

    Quantum Science and Technology , abstract =

    Ruchka, Pavel and Hammer, Sina and Rockenhäuser, Marian and Albrecht, Ralf and Drozella, Johannes and Thiele, Simon and Giessen, Harald and Langen, Tim , title =. Quantum Science and Technology , abstract =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac796c , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac796c 2022

  29. [29]

    AAS/Division for Extreme Solar Systems Abstracts , year = 2015, series =

    A laser locked Fabry-Perot etalon with 3 cm/s stability for wavelength calibration of Doppler spectrographs. AAS/Division for Extreme Solar Systems Abstracts , year = 2015, series =

    2015

  30. [30]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Rubidium-traced white-light etalon calibrator for radial velocity measurements at the cm s ^ -1 level. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.3.2.025003 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.3.2.025003

  31. [31]

    Applied Optics , volume=

    Coupling starlight into single-mode fiber optics , author=. Applied Optics , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  32. [32]

    A new scheme of conical-wedge-shaped fiber endface for coupling between high-power laser diodes and single-mode fibers , year=

    Szu-Ming Yeh and Sun-Yuan Huang and Wood-Hi Cheng , journal=. A new scheme of conical-wedge-shaped fiber endface for coupling between high-power laser diodes and single-mode fibers , year=. doi:10.1109/JLT.2005.844511 , ISSN=

    arXiv 2005

  33. [33]

    Nanoscribe GmbH , title=