Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 91 references

The Sun's 5.5 MeV fusion gamma ray can be up-scattered on electrons into MeV-scale axion-like particles, and existing dark-matter and neutrino detectors already constrain the electron coupling to a few times 10^-6 for masses below 1 MeV.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:18 UTC pith:FJTAXMTP

load-bearing objection New solar ALP production channel worth taking seriously, but the paper's free-streaming assumption fails at the couplings it claims to probe, so the quoted limits are not yet established. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21168 v1 pith:FJTAXMTP submitted 2026-07-23 hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRhep-ex

MeV Electrophilic Axion-like Particles from Sun

Shao-Feng Ge , Sk Jeesun , Tao Li This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRhep-ex
keywords Axion-like particlesSolar axion fluxElectron coupling g_aeCompton-like scattering5.5 MeV fusion photonDark matter direct detectionAxio-electric effectMeV ALP parameter space
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that the Sun's well-measured 5.5 MeV gamma ray from deuteron-proton fusion can convert, via Compton-like scattering on solar electrons, into a continuous flux of MeV-scale axion-like particles that couple only to electrons. If that is right, ordinary dark-matter direct-detection experiments holding electron-recoil data can be re-used as axion telescopes. The quantitative claim is that published LZ and PandaX-4T data each constrain g_ae to about 3.7e-6, and Borexino to about 1.7e-6, for m_a below 1 MeV, with a 200 tonne-year liquid-xenon exposure reaching 1.5e-7 near 1 MeV. The paper identifies 0.4-1 MeV as a window where these limits exceed existing beam-dump, stellar-cooling, and supernova bounds. The reason the claim is worth taking seriously is that a single 2-to-2 amplitude controls both production and detection, so the rate scales as g_ae^4 and exposure converts directly into coupling reach.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the Sun is a factory for MeV-scale electrophilic ALPs: the monochromatic 5.5 MeV gamma ray from the pp-chain reaction p + D -> 3He + gamma Compton-scatters off solar electrons to produce a continuous flux of ALPs with energies from roughly 0.25 MeV to about 4 MeV. Because the ALP couples to electrons, the same Compton-like process runs in reverse in a detector, and the authors show that published electron-recoil data from LZ and PandaX-4T, together with Borexino Phase-I, place 90% upper limits of 3.7e-6, 3.7e-6, and 1.7e-6 on g_ae for m_a < 1 MeV. They further find that a 200 tonne-year liquid-xenon exposure would reach g_ae ~ 1.5e-7 near m

What carries the argument

The engine is the 2-to-2 Compton-like amplitude gamma + e -> e + a, computed with the ALP-electron pseudo-Yukawa interaction -i g_ae a ebar gamma5 e and the initial electron at rest. The same amplitude, time-reversed, gives the detection process a + e -> e + gamma; folded with the monochromatic 5.5 MeV photon spectrum and a photon rate normalized to the measured pp-neutrino flux, it yields the solar ALP flux and the detector event rate. Because production and detection each carry a factor of g_ae, the total rate scales as g_ae^4, which is what converts exposure into coupling sensitivity. The paper supplements this with axio-electric absorption and ALP-induced pair production, which matter fo

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the ALPs produced in the solar core escape to Earth without being re-scattered or absorbed; the paper argues from a mean free path longer than the solar radius, but using its own cross-section scale and the solar core density gives an optical depth that can approach order unity at the couplings where the LZ and PandaX-4T limits are quoted.

What would settle it

A direct numerical check would be to integrate the optical depth tau = integral n_e sigma_C dr along a radial line through the Sun using the paper's own Compton-like cross section and a realistic solar density profile; if tau reaches order one or larger at g_ae ~ 3.7e-6, then the escaping flux no longer scales as g_ae^2 and the derived LZ and PandaX-4T limits would be overestimated. Observationally, an attenuation-induced flattening or break in the electron-recoil spectrum below about 0.3 MeV, absent from the free-streaming prediction, would also signal that the simple flux model is incomplete

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Existing LZ and PandaX-4T electron-recoil data can already exclude g_ae ≳ 3.7e-6 for m_a ≲ 1 MeV; Borexino improves this reach to about 1.7e-6.
  • The mass window 0.4 MeV ≲ m_a ≲ 1 MeV is newly probed by these limits, since previous laboratory and astrophysical constraints leave it open.
  • A future 200 tonne-year liquid-xenon exposure can reach g_ae ~ 1.5e-7 near m_a ~ 1 MeV, accessing couplings inaccessible to current beam-dump and SN1987A bounds in that range.
  • The signal spectrum is largely independent of ALP mass below about 0.3 MeV, so a null search in that region directly constrains g_ae rather than the ALP mass.
  • Because the event rate scales as g_ae^4, every factor-of-ten increase in exposure improves the coupling limit by roughly a factor of 1.78.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper: the same 5.5 MeV fusion photon source could seed production of other electron-coupled MeV particles, such as dark photons or milli-charged particles, so the flux template and g^4 scaling transfer directly to those searches.
  • Going beyond the paper: the free-streaming assumption deserves a full solar transport treatment; if attenuation is not negligible at the quoted couplings, the actual reach would shift toward smaller g_ae or could be recovered by including re-scattering and regeneration.
  • Going beyond the paper: because the sensitivity below ~0.3 MeV is nearly mass-independent, a null result in that region would be primarily a measurement of g_ae and could sharpen stellar-cooling bounds rather than merely closing the ALP mass window.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that 5.5 MeV photons from the p+D -> 3He+gamma reaction in the Sun Compton-like scatter off ambient electrons to produce MeV electron-coupled ALPs, with the photon number normalized to the measured pp-neutrino flux. It computes the expected flux, event rates, and 90% C.L. limits at LZ, PandaX-4T, Borexino, and a 200 tonne-year PandaX-xT projection. The central claims are that existing data reach g_ae ~ 3.7e-6 (LZ/PandaX-4T) and 1.7e-6 (Borexino), and that a future exposure can reach g_ae ~ 1.5e-7 near m_a ~ 1 MeV, probing new parameter space around 0.3-1 MeV.

Significance. If correct, the paper identifies a concrete, testable solar source of MeV ALPs and demonstrates that already-collected direct-detection and neutrino data can constrain a previously less-explored mass window. The amplitudes, cross sections, and flux formula are explicit, and the event rate scales as g_ae^4 in the free-streaming limit. The main weakness is the free-streaming assumption for solar ALPs, which directly affects the quantitative limits; nevertheless, the proposed mechanism and detection strategy are novel and worth pursuing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3, last paragraph (end of Sec. 3), Eq. (3.2)] The free-streaming assumption is invalid for the couplings probed. The paragraph after Eq. (3.2) estimates the mean free path using the average solar electron density. But production is concentrated in the solar core (r <~ 0.2 R_sun) where n_e ~ 7e25 cm^-3. With the paper's own sigma_C ~ 10^-25 g_ae^2 cm^2, at g_ae = 3.7e-6 (the LZ/PandaX limit) l = (n_e sigma_C)^-1 ~ 10^10 cm ~ 0.14 R_sun and the column density to the surface gives tau ~ O(1-10). The escaping flux is then attenuated and no longer scales as g_ae^2; the event rate in Eq. (3.3) is not proportional to g_ae^4 over the claimed excluded range. A line-of-sight attenuation integral or simplified radiative transfer is required before the limits in Fig. 7 and the abstract can be trusted.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.6)] The flux formula treats each 5.5 MeV photon as having a single chance to produce an ALP with probability dsigma/sigma_tot. In the solar core the Compton mean free path is ~0.01 cm, so the photon undergoes many Compton scatters before its energy drops below threshold; each scattering can produce an ALP. The total ALP yield per line photon is therefore larger than Eq. (2.6), and the absolute flux - and hence all derived limits - is not correctly normalized. The authors should justify that the first-scatter contribution dominates, or include the photon cascade/energy-degradation in Eq. (2.6).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4] The abstract uses g_ae <~ for limits while the conclusion uses g_ae >~ in some places (e.g., 'can reach g_ae >~ 3.7e-6'). Please use a consistent convention (upper limit on the allowed coupling).
  2. [Sec. 3.2 and Conclusion] The claimed new mass window is '0.4 MeV <~ m_a <~ 1 MeV' in the abstract but '0.3 MeV <~ m_a <~ 1 MeV' in Sec. 3.2 and the Conclusion. Please harmonize.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Borexino exposure] The Borexino exposure is given as '153.6 tonne x year' citing [109]. Reference [109] states 153.6 tonnes x 740.7 days, which is ~311.8 tonne-year (or 153.6 tonne-day depending on convention). Please correct the exposure and check the resulting limit.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 7] The text says the Borexino curve is 'blue solid' but the Fig. 7 caption says 'dark cyan solid'. Please make the color description consistent.
  5. [Throughout] Typos and wording: 'cruel cut' should be 'sharp cut'; 'absorpted' -> 'absorbed'; 'Being similar as' -> 'Being similar to'; 'For simple estimation' -> 'For a simple estimate'.
  6. [Sec. 2, pp neutrino flux] The paper quotes Phi_pp_nu = 10^11 cm^-2 s^-1, but the Borexino measurement of the pp neutrino flux is ~6e10 cm^-2 s^-1. Please verify the normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central limits come from external data and standard QED/ALP rates; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The production flux in Sec. 2 is constructed from the externally measured pp-neutrino flux [82], the standard QED/ALP Compton-like amplitude in Eq. (2.3), and the QED Compton cross section, so the signal rate scales as g_ae^4 without any parameter being fitted to the final limit. The constraints in Sec. 3.2 are obtained by fitting published spectra from LZ [104], PandaX-4T [105], and Borexino [103]; the ALP signal template is an independent prediction, not a fit parameter renamed as a result. Self-citations ([81], [86], [105]) are contextual or data references; in particular [105] is the PandaX-4T experimental publication and supplies external data rather than a self-derived theorem. The manuscript itself flags the free-streaming/attenuation assumption at the end of Sec. 3, and the reader's estimate suggests the optical depth in the solar core may be O(1-10) at the quoted couplings. That is a physical robustness concern, not circularity: a proper radiative-transfer treatment would rescale the numerical limits but would not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs. Overall, no circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new entity: the ALP is a well-known hypothetical particle, and all interactions are parameterized by g_ae and m_a, which are scanned rather than fitted. The ledger is dominated by modeling choices: the one-scatter flux approximation, the assumed detector efficiency, the zero-background projection, and especially the assumed transparency of the Sun to MeV ALPs. The attenuation assumption is the most fragile entry because it is numerically questionable at the couplings the paper claims to probe.

free parameters (2)
  • detection efficiency E = 1
    Adopted as 'optimistic constant efficiency' in all rate calculations (Sec. 3.1); directly scales the signal rate and therefore the g_ae limits.
  • projected background B = 0
    Used for the PandaX-xT Asimov projection (Sec. 3.2); optimistic and affects the quoted 1.6e-6/1.5e-7 projections.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption ALP-electron interaction is the pseudo-Yukawa coupling in Eq. (2.1), -i g_ae a ebar γ5 e.
    The whole production/detection calculation is based on this operator; it is a standard EFT description of electron-coupled ALPs.
  • domain assumption The number of 5.5 MeV photons from p+d→3He+γ equals the pp neutrino rate.
    Used in Eq. (2.6) to normalize the flux; based on standard solar model and Borexino pp-neutrino measurement, but no uncertainty is propagated.
  • domain assumption Initial solar electrons can be treated as at rest.
    The cross-section derivation assumes a rest-frame electron; valid because MeV photon energy is much larger than keV solar electron kinetic energies.
  • ad hoc to paper ALPs escape the Sun without significant attenuation.
    The paper's final paragraph of Sec. 3.2 asserts l ≳ 10^6 km for g_ae < 1e-5, but core-density estimates give τ ∼ 1-10 at the quoted limits; this assumption is load-bearing and appears unjustified.
  • ad hoc to paper Detection efficiency is 100% and, for the projection, background is zero.
    Adopted as 'conservative yet simplified' for the current-data limits and 'optimistic' for the PandaX-xT projection; directly affects the numerical sensitivities.
  • domain assumption The background models in Refs [104], [105], and [103] correctly describe the LZ, PandaX-4T, and Borexino data.
    The limit-setting procedure relies on these published background spectra and their systematic assumptions without re-deriving them.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19367 in / 34782 out tokens · 331460 ms · 2026-08-01T08:18:21.733554+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work explores the production of an MeV-scale electrophilic axion-like particles (ALPs) by utilizing the monochromatic 5.5MeV photon resulting from the nuclear fusion processes in the Sun. These 5.5MeV photons can undergo the Compton-like scattering with the ambient electrons in the solar matter to produce a substantial flux of MeV ALPs. Upon reaching the Earth, such ALPs can be detected via the same electron coupling, offering a new opportunity for the dark matter (DM) direct detection experiments to probe the previously unexplored parameter regions. We show that the existing data of LZ, PandaX-4T, and Borexino can attain the sensitivities $g_{ae} \lesssim 3.7 \times 10^{-6}$, $g_{ae} \lesssim 3.7 \times 10^{-6}$ and $g_{ae} \lesssim 1.7 \times 10^{-6}$, respectively, for $m_a \lesssim 1$MeV. An optimistic 200 tonne$\times$year exposure by PandaX-xT can reach $g_{ae}\lesssim 1.6 \times 10^{-6}$ for most of the mass window $m_a < 1$MeV and even $g_{ae} \lesssim 1.5 \times 10^{-7}$ with $m_a$ approaching 1MeV. Despite the stringent constraints from different laboratory experiments and astrophysical observations, our obtained limits from LZ, PandaX-4T, and Borexino can probe new parameter regions, specifically in the mass window $0.4\,{\rm MeV} \lesssim m_a \lesssim 1$MeV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21168 by Shao-Feng Ge, Sk Jeesun, Tao Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feynman diagrams for the solar production of ALP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The MeV solar axion differential flux arriving at Earth with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The expected event spectra of the recoil photon energy due to the solar ALP-electron Compton-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the ALP-e cross sections per Xenon atom for the Compton-like scattering (dark blue), the axio-electric effect (red) and the axion induced pair production (green) with benchmark ALP mass ma = 0.1 MeV. [99]. The total event rate from such a process is given by, Raee ≡ texpnA Z Emax a Emin a σaee dΦa dEa dEa. (3.9) For comparison, we show in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The spectrum fitting results of the LZ experiment with the upper panels showing the event rates [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spectrum fitting results of the PandaX experiment with the upper panels showing the event [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The projected 90% C.L. limit in the gae vs. ma plane at the DM and neutrino experiments such as LZ (red dotted), PandaX-4T (blue dashed), Borexino (dark cyan solid), and PandaX-xT (brown dot-dashed). The existing constraints are also portrayed with filled regions for comparison. detector exposures. In the same plane of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 65 linked inside Pith

  1. [2]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  2. [3]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    Frank Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

    1978

  3. [4]

    A New Light Boson?,

    Steven Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

    1978

  4. [5]

    Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,

    Jihn E. Kim, “Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 103

    1979

  5. [6]

    Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,

    Mikhail A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and Valentin I. Zakharov, “Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,” Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506

    1980

  6. [7]

    On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

    1980

  7. [8]

    A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,

    Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, and Mark Srednicki, “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199–202

    1981

  8. [9]

    The Strong CP problem and axions,

    R. D. Peccei, “The Strong CP problem and axions,” Lect. Notes Phys.741(2008) 3–17, [arXiv:hep-ph/0607268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [10]

    The landscape of QCD axion models,

    Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, Enrico Nardi, and Luca Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1–117, [arXiv:2003.01100[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [11]

    Anke Biek¨ otter and Ken Mimasu, Axions and Axion-like particles: collider searches. 8,

  11. [12]

    Axion-like particles as mediators for dark matter: beyond freeze-out,

    A. Bharucha, F. Br¨ ummer, N. Desai, and S. Mutzel, “Axion-like particles as mediators for dark matter: beyond freeze-out,” JHEP02(2023) 141, [arXiv:2209.03932[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [13]

    The Not So Harmless Axion,

    Michael Dine and Willy Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 137–141

    1983

  13. [14]

    Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

    John Preskill, Mark B. Wise, and Frank Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127–132

    1983

  14. [15]

    A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133–136

    1983

  15. [16]

    Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism,

    Raymond T. Co, Lawrence J. Hall, and Keisuke Harigaya, “Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 25, (2020) 251802, [arXiv:1910.14152[hep-ph]]. 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [17]

    WISPy Cold Dark Matter,

    Paola Arias, Davide Cadamuro, Mark Goodsell, Joerg Jaeckel, Javier Redondo, and Andreas Ringwald, “WISPy Cold Dark Matter,” JCAP06(2012) 013, [arXiv:1201.5902[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [18]

    3.55 keV hint for decaying axionlike particle dark matter,

    Joerg Jaeckel, Javier Redondo, and Andreas Ringwald, “3.55 keV hint for decaying axionlike particle dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 103511, [arXiv:1402.7335 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [19]

    Axion-like particle (ALP) portal freeze-in dark matter confronting ALP search experiments,

    Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Anish Ghoshal, and Sk Jeesun, “Axion-like particle (ALP) portal freeze-in dark matter confronting ALP search experiments,” JHEP01(2024) 026, [arXiv:2305.09188[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [20]

    The low-energy frontier of particle physics,

    Joerg Jaeckel and Andreas Ringwald, “The low-energy frontier of particle physics,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 405–437, [arXiv:1002.0329[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [21]

    Multiple Axions in Laboratory Experiments,

    Arturo de Giorgi, Joerg Jaeckel, Sebastian Monath, and Volodymyr Takhistov, “Multiple Axions in Laboratory Experiments,” [arXiv:2512.16837[hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  21. [22]

    Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles,

    Martin Bauer, Matthias Neubert, and Andrea Thamm, “Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles,” JHEP12(2017) 044, [arXiv:1708.00443[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [23]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,

    Andrea Caputo and Georg Raffelt, “Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,” PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 041, [arXiv:2401.13728[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    Axion Cosmology,

    David J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept.643(2016) 1–79, [arXiv:1510.07633[astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [25]

    Novel cosmological bounds on thermally-produced axion-like particles,

    Luca Caloni, Martina Gerbino, Massimiliano Lattanzi, and Luca Visinelli, “Novel cosmological bounds on thermally-produced axion-like particles,” JCAP09(2022) 021, [arXiv:2205.01637[astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [26]

    Cosmological bounds on sub-MeV mass axions,

    Davide Cadamuro, Steen Hannestad, Georg Raffelt, and Javier Redondo, “Cosmological bounds on sub-MeV mass axions,” JCAP02(2011) 003, [arXiv:1011.3694[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [27]

    Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC,

    Joerg Jaeckel and Michael Spannowsky, “Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC,” Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 482–487, [arXiv:1509.00476[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [28]

    Prospects for sub-EW-scale ALP searches viaγ+bb¯signatures at the LHC using jet substructure techniques,

    Amit Adhikary, Aoife Bharucha, Lorenzo Feligioni, and Michele Frigerio, “Prospects for sub-EW-scale ALP searches viaγ+bb¯signatures at the LHC using jet substructure techniques,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 5, (2025) 055042, [arXiv:2410.09033[hep-ph]]. [29]BESIIICollaboration, Medina Ablikim et al., “Search for an axion-like particle in radiative J/ψdecays,” Phys....

    arXiv 2025

  28. [31]

    Belle II studies of missing energy decays and searches for dark photon production,

    Gianluca Inguglia, “Belle II studies of missing energy decays and searches for dark photon production,” PoSDIS2016(2016) 263, [arXiv:1607.02089[hep-ex]]. 18 [32]CHARMCollaboration, F. Bergsma et al., “Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,” Phys. Lett. B157(1985) 458–462

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [33]

    Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump,

    J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu, L. W. Mo, T. A. Nunamaker, and P. Rassmann, “Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump,” Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 3375. [34]NA64Collaboration, D. Banerjee et al., “Search for Axionlike and Scalar Particles with the NA64 Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  30. [35]

    Probing Long-lived Axions at the KOTO Experiment,

    Yoav Afik, Babette D¨ obrich, Jan Jerhot, Yotam Soreq, and Kohsaku Tobioka, “Probing Long-lived Axions at the KOTO Experiment,” [arXiv:2303.01521[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [36]

    Searching for axions with kaon decay at rest,

    Yohei Ema, Zhen Liu, and Ryan Plestid, “Searching for axions with kaon decay at rest,” [arXiv:2308.08589[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [37]

    Cool WISPs for stellar cooling excesses,

    Maurizio Giannotti, Igor Irastorza, Javier Redondo, and Andreas Ringwald, “Cool WISPs for stellar cooling excesses,” JCAP05(2016) 057, [arXiv:1512.08108 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [38]

    Supernova bound on axionlike particles coupled with electrons,

    Pierluca Carenza and Giuseppe Lucente, “Supernova bound on axionlike particles coupled with electrons,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 10, (2021) 103007, [arXiv:2107.12393 [hep-ph]]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 049901 (2024)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [39]

    Axion emission from supernovae: a cheatsheet,

    Pierluca Carenza, “Axion emission from supernovae: a cheatsheet,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138no. 9, (2023) 836, [arXiv:2309.14798[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [40]

    Getting the most on supernova axions,

    Alessandro Lella, Pierluca Carenza, Giampaolo Co’, Giuseppe Lucente, Maurizio Giannotti, Alessandro Mirizzi, and Thomas Rauscher, “Getting the most on supernova axions,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 2, (2024) 023001, [arXiv:2306.01048[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [41]

    Protoneutron stars as cosmic factories for massive axionlike particles,

    Alessandro Lella, Pierluca Carenza, Giuseppe Lucente, Maurizio Giannotti, and Alessandro Mirizzi, “Protoneutron stars as cosmic factories for massive axionlike particles,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 10, (2023) 103017, [arXiv:2211.13760[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [42]

    Axion signatures from supernova explosions through the nucleon electric-dipole portal,

    Giuseppe Lucente, Leonardo Mastrototaro, Pierluca Carenza, Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, and Alessandro Mirizzi, “Axion signatures from supernova explosions through the nucleon electric-dipole portal,” Phys. Rev. D105no. 12, (2022) 123020, [arXiv:2203.15812[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [43]

    Probing a diffuse flux of axionlike particles from Galactic supernovae with neutrino water Cherenkov detectors,

    David Alonso-Gonz´ alez, David Cerde˜ no, Marina Cerme˜ no, and Andres D. Perez, “Probing a diffuse flux of axionlike particles from Galactic supernovae with neutrino water Cherenkov detectors,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 083019, [arXiv:2412.09595[hep-ph]]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 112, 029901 (2025)]. 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [44]

    Beyond thermal approximations: Precise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles,

    Nicola Barbieri, Luca Caloni, Martina Gerbino, Massimiliano Lattanzi, and Luca Visinelli, “Beyond thermal approximations: Precise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles,” [arXiv:2602.11100[astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [45]

    Constraints on Axion-Lepton coupling from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,

    Diptimoy Ghosh and Divya Sachdeva, “Constraints on Axion-Lepton coupling from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,” JCAP10(2020) 060, [arXiv:2007.01873[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [46]

    Robust cosmological constraints on axion-like particles,

    Paul Frederik Depta, Marco Hufnagel, and Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, “Robust cosmological constraints on axion-like particles,” JCAP05(2020) 009, [arXiv:2002.08370[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [47]

    Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look,

    Miguel Escudero, Clara Garcia-Perez, and Maksym Ovchynnikov, “Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look,” [arXiv:2511.00157[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [48]

    A comprehensive calculation of the Primakoff process and the solar axion flux,

    Quan-feng Wu and Xun-Jie Xu, “A comprehensive calculation of the Primakoff process and the solar axion flux,” JCAP07(2024) 013, [arXiv:2402.16083[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [49]

    Constraints on the axion-electron coupling for solar axions produced by Compton process and bremsstrahlung,

    A. V. Derbin, A. S. Kayunov, V. N. Muratova, D. A. Semenov, and E. V. Unzhakov, “Constraints on the axion-electron coupling for solar axions produced by Compton process and bremsstrahlung,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 023505, [arXiv:1101.2290 [hep-ex]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [50]

    Axion astrophysics,

    Pierluca Carenza, Maurizio Giannotti, Jordi Isern, Alessandro Mirizzi, and Oscar Straniero, “Axion astrophysics,” Phys. Rept.1117(2025) 1–102, [arXiv:2411.02492 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [51]

    Solar axion flux from the axion-electron coupling,

    Javier Redondo, “Solar axion flux from the axion-electron coupling,” JCAP12(2013) 008, [arXiv:1310.0823[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [52]

    Quantifying uncertainties in the solar axion flux and their impact on determining axion model parameters,

    Sebastian Hoof, Joerg Jaeckel, and Lennert J. Thormaehlen, “Quantifying uncertainties in the solar axion flux and their impact on determining axion model parameters,” JCAP 09(2021) 006, [arXiv:2101.08789[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [53]

    Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited,

    Javier Redondo and Georg Raffelt, “Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited,” JCAP08(2013) 034, [arXiv:1305.2920[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [54]

    The Dark Photon,

    Marco Fabbrichesi, Emidio Gabrielli, and Gaia Lanfranchi, “The Dark Photon,” [arXiv:2005.01515[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  50. [55]

    New limits on dark photons from solar emission and keV scale dark matter,

    Haipeng An, Maxim Pospelov, Josef Pradler, and Adam Ritz, “New limits on dark photons from solar emission and keV scale dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 115022, [arXiv:2006.13929[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [56]

    Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,

    C. Antel et al., “Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,” Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 12, (2023) 1122, [arXiv:2305.01715[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [57]

    Updated bounds on millicharged particles,

    Sacha Davidson, Steen Hannestad, and Georg Raffelt, “Updated bounds on millicharged particles,” JHEP05(2000) 003, [arXiv:hep-ph/0001179]. 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  53. [58]

    A new Generation of Standard Solar Models,

    N´ uria Vinyoles, Aldo M. Serenelli, Francesco L. Villante, Sarbani Basu, Johannes Bergstr¨ om, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, Carlos Pe˜ na-Garay, and Ningqiang Song, “A new Generation of Standard Solar Models,” Astrophys. J.835no. 2, (2017) 202, [arXiv:1611.09867[astro-ph.SR]]. [59]CASTCollaboration, S. Andriamonje et al., “Search for solar axi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [60]

    Search for Solar Axions Produced in thep+d→ 3He + AReaction,

    A. V. Derbin, A. S. Kayunov, and V. N. Muratova, “Search for Solar Axions Produced in thep+d→ 3He + AReaction,” Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys.74(2010) 805, [arXiv:1007.3387[hep-ex]]. [61]BorexinoCollaboration, G. Bellini et al., “Search for Solar Axions Produced in p(d, 3He)AReaction with Borexino Detector,” Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 092003, [arXiv:1203.6258[hep-ex]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [62]

    Searching for Solar Axions Using Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,

    Aagaman Bhusal, Nick Houston, and Tianjun Li, “Searching for Solar Axions Using Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 9, (2021) 091601, [arXiv:2004.02733[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [63]

    Calculated Event Rates for Axion Detection via Atomic and Nuclear Processes,

    John D. Vergados, Paraskevi C. Divari, and Hiroyasu Ejiri, “Calculated Event Rates for Axion Detection via Atomic and Nuclear Processes,” Adv. High Energy Phys.2022 (2022) 7373365, [arXiv:2104.12213[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [64]

    Probing high-energy solar axion flux with a large scintillation neutrino detector,

    Giuseppe Lucente, Newton Nath, Francesco Capozzi, Maurizio Giannotti, and Alessandro Mirizzi, “Probing high-energy solar axion flux with a large scintillation neutrino detector,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) 123007, [arXiv:2209.11780 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [65]

    Axion-induced pair production: A new strategy for axion detection,

    Fernando Arias-Arag´ on, Maurizio Giannotti, Giovanni Grilli di Cortona, and Federico Mescia, “Axion-induced pair production: A new strategy for axion detection,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 4, (2025) 043021, [arXiv:2411.19327[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [66]

    A Proposal to search for a monochromatic component of solar axions using Fe-57,

    Shigetaka Moriyama, “A Proposal to search for a monochromatic component of solar axions using Fe-57,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 3222–3225, [arXiv:hep-ph/9504318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  60. [67]

    Search for invisible axions using Fe-57,

    M. Krcmar, Z. Krecak, M. Stipcevic, A. Ljubicic, and D. A. Bradley, “Search for invisible axions using Fe-57,” Phys. Lett. B442(1998) 38, [arXiv:nucl-ex/9801005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  61. [68]

    Results of a search for monochromatic solar axions using Fe-57,

    T. Namba, “Results of a search for monochromatic solar axions using Fe-57,” Phys. Lett. B645(2007) 398–401

    2007

  62. [69]

    Search for resonant absorption of solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Fe-57 nuclei,

    A. V. Derbin, A. I. Egorov, I. A. Mitropolsky, V. N. Muratova, N. V. Bazlov, S. V. Bakhlanov, D. A. Semenov, and E. V. Unzhakov, “Search for resonant absorption of solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Fe-57 nuclei,” JETP Lett.85(2007) 12–16. 21

    2007

  63. [70]

    Search for Resonant Absorption of Solar Axions Emitted in M1 Transition in Fe-57 Nuclei,

    A. V. Derbin, A. I. Egorov, I. A. Mitropol’sky, V. N. Muratova, D. A. Semenov, and E. V. Unzhakov, “Search for Resonant Absorption of Solar Axions Emitted in M1 Transition in Fe-57 Nuclei,” Eur. Phys. J. C62(2009) 755–760, [arXiv:0906.0256 [hep-ex]]. [71]CASTCollaboration, S. Andriamonje et al., “Search for 14.4-keV solar axions emitted in the M1-transiti...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [72]

    New limit on the mass of 14.4-keV solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Fe-57 nuclei,

    A. V. Derbin, V. N. Muratova, D. A. Semenov, and E. V. Unzhakov, “New limit on the mass of 14.4-keV solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Fe-57 nuclei,” Phys. Atom. Nucl.74(2011) 596–602. [73]CUORECollaboration, F. Alessandria et al., “Search for 14.4 keV solar axions from M1 transition of Fe-57 with CUORE crystals,” JCAP05(2013) 007, [arXiv:1209.28...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [74]

    Search for solar axions using Li-7,

    M. Krcmar, Z. Krecak, A. Ljubicic, M. Stipcevic, and D. A. Bradley, “Search for solar axions using Li-7,” Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 115016, [arXiv:hep-ex/0104035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [75]

    Search for solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Li-7 nuclei,

    A. V. Derbin, A. I. Egorov, I. A. Mitropolsky, and V. N. Muratova, “Search for solar axions emitted in an M1 transition in Li-7 nuclei,” JETP Lett.81(2005) 365–370. [76]BorexinoCollaboration, G. Bellini et al., “Search for solar axions emitted in the M1-transition of Li-7* with Borexino CTF,” Eur. Phys. J. C54(2008) 61–72

    2005

  67. [77]

    Li-7 solar axions: Preliminary results and feasibility studies,

    P. Belli et al., “Li-7 solar axions: Preliminary results and feasibility studies,” Nucl. Phys. A806(2008) 388–397

    2008

  68. [78]

    Search for Li-7 solar axions using resonant absorption in LiF crystal: Final results,

    P. Belli, R. Bernabei, F. Cappella, R. Cerulli, F. A. Danevich, A. Incicchitti, V. V. Kobychev, M. Laubenstein, O. G. Polischuk, and V. I. Tretyak, “Search for Li-7 solar axions using resonant absorption in LiF crystal: Final results,” Phys. Lett. B711 (2012) 41–45

    2012

  69. [79]

    A Search for solar hadronic axions using 83Kr,

    K. Jakovcic, Z. Krecak, M. Krcmar, and A. Ljubicic, “A Search for solar hadronic axions using 83Kr,” Radiat. Phys. Chem.71(2004) 793–794, [arXiv:nucl-ex/0402016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [80]

    First result of the experimental search for the 9.4 keV solar axion reactions with 83Kr in the copper proportional counter,

    Yu. M. Gavrilyuk et al., “First result of the experimental search for the 9.4 keV solar axion reactions with 83Kr in the copper proportional counter,” Phys. Part. Nucl.46 no. 2, (2015) 152–156, [arXiv:1405.1271[nucl-ex]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [81]

    Nuclear Production and Analytic Attenuation of Energetic MeV Solar Dark Matter,

    Shao-Feng Ge, Jie Sheng, Chen Xia, and Chuan-Yang Xing, “Nuclear Production and Analytic Attenuation of Energetic MeV Solar Dark Matter,” Physics Letters B (8, 2024) , [arXiv:2408.12448[hep-ph]]. [82]BOREXINOCollaboration, M. Agostini et al., “Comprehensive measurement of pp-chain solar neutrinos,” Nature562no. 7728, (2018) 505–510. 22

    arXiv 2024

  72. [83]

    Light scalars and dark photons in Borexino and LSND experiments,

    Maxim Pospelov and Yu-Dai Tsai, “Light scalars and dark photons in Borexino and LSND experiments,” Phys. Lett. B785(2018) 288–295, [arXiv:1706.00424[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [84]

    Directly Detecting Signals from Absorption of Fermionic Dark Matter,

    Jeff A. Dror, Gilly Elor, and Robert Mcgehee, “Directly Detecting Signals from Absorption of Fermionic Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 18, (2020) 18, [arXiv:1905.12635[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [85]

    Absorption of Fermionic Dark Matter by Nuclear Targets,

    Jeff A. Dror, Gilly Elor, and Robert Mcgehee, “Absorption of Fermionic Dark Matter by Nuclear Targets,” JHEP02(2020) 134, [arXiv:1908.10861[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [86]

    Revisiting the fermionic dark matter absorption on electron target,

    Shao-Feng Ge, Xiao-Gang He, Xiao-Dong Ma, and Jie Sheng, “Revisiting the fermionic dark matter absorption on electron target,” JHEP05(2022) 191, [arXiv:2201.11497 [hep-ph]]. [87]PandaXCollaboration, Xinning Zeng et al., “Exploring New Physics with PandaX-4T Low Energy Electronic Recoil Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 4, (2025) 041001, [arXiv:2408.07641[hep-...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [92]

    Laboratory Limits on Solar Axions From an Ultralow Background Germanium Spectrometer,

    F. T. Avignone, III, R. L. Brodzinski, S. Dimopoulos, G. D. Starkman, A. K. Drukier, D. N. Spergel, G. Gelmini, and B. W. Lynn, “Laboratory Limits on Solar Axions From an Ultralow Background Germanium Spectrometer,” Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 2752

    1987

  77. [93]

    Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter,

    Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, and Mikhail B. Voloshin, “Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 115012, [arXiv:0807.3279[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [94]

    Reexamining the Solar Axion Explanation for the XENON1T Excess,

    Christina Gao, Jia Liu, Lian-Tao Wang, Xiao-Ping Wang, Wei Xue, and Yi-Ming Zhong, “Reexamining the Solar Axion Explanation for the XENON1T Excess,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 13, (2020) 131806, [arXiv:2006.14598[hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  79. [95]

    PHOTON CROSS-SECTIONS FROM 0.1-KeV TO 1-MeV FOR ELEMENTS Z = 1 TO Z = 94,

    William J. Veigele, “PHOTON CROSS-SECTIONS FROM 0.1-KeV TO 1-MeV FOR ELEMENTS Z = 1 TO Z = 94,”

  80. [96]

    Lepton Pair Production of a Light Pseudoscalar Particle via the Bethe-Heitler Process,

    B. R. Kim, R. Rodenberg, and C. Stamm, “Lepton Pair Production of a Light Pseudoscalar Particle via the Bethe-Heitler Process,” Phys. Lett. B122(1983) 87–89. 23

    1983

Showing first 80 references.