Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 123 references

Complete single-vector-vertex Lagrangians for the vector-meson nonet are constructed through NNLO in the tensor-field and hidden-local-symmetry representations and NLO in the vector-field representation, with redundant terms in earlier NLO

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 07:58 UTC pith:WLUMZYAM

load-bearing objection A careful, internally consistent enumeration of vector-meson chiral Lagrangians whose central completeness claims you cannot verify from the text because no code or artifacts are shipped. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21678 v1 pith:WLUMZYAM submitted 2026-07-23 hep-ph

Higher-order chiral Lagrangians with vector meson nonet in different representations

Wei Guo , Qin-He Yang , Shao-Zhou Jiang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords chiral perturbation theoryvector meson nonethidden local symmetrytensor-field representationnext-to-next-to-leading orderoperator basisanomalous chiral Lagrangiansingle-vector vertices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper sets out to supply the exact operator content of effective Lagrangians that couple a vector-meson nonet to the pseudoscalar mesons, carrying the construction one order further than existing work: next-to-leading order in the vector-field representation and next-to-next-to-leading order in the tensor-field and hidden-local-symmetry (HLS) representations, in both normal and anomalous sectors. It claims that the long tables in the text and supplement are complete minimal bases of independent single-vector-vertex operators—231 NLO terms in the SU(3) vector-field case, 2,172 NNLO terms in the SU(3) tensor-field case, and 1,371 NNLO terms in the SU(3) HLS case. It also claims that several terms in previously published NLO octet lists are linearly dependent and should be removed. The practical stake is that future higher-order calculations of vector-meson masses, decays, and scattering can use these lists as the definitive starting set, rather than relying on ad hoc or redundant selections. The paper also examines the relation between tensor-field and HLS representations and concludes that a full term-by-term equivalence would require including multi-vector vertices, beyond the single-vector restriction studied here.

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the conclusions, is that the chiral Lagrangians with a vector-meson nonet are constructed to NLO in the vector-field representation and to NNLO in the tensor-field and HLS representations, including normal and anomalous parts, for single-vector-meson vertices. The tables are presented as minimal lists of linearly independent operators, obtained by generating every invariant contraction of the building blocks and then imposing the standard linear relations: partial integration, leading-order equations of motion for the vector field, the Bianchi identity, the Schouten identity, and the Cayley-Hamilton relations for SU(2) and SU(3). The paper further claims that in

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is an enumeration-and-reduction procedure. Terms are built from the standard chiral blocks—u_mu, chi_±, f_±^{mu nu}, h^{mu nu}—together with the vector-meson object (V^mu, W^mu nu, or the HLS gauge field), assigned chiral dimensions and transformation properties in the tables. All invariant single-vector-vertex contractions are generated, and linear dependencies are removed using partial integration, the leading-order equations of motion, the Bianchi identity, the Schouten identity, and Cayley-Hamilton identities; in the HLS case the symmetric tensors H and \bar H (Eqs. (43) and (45)) are introduced because at higher order the symmetric combinations become necessary. T

Load-bearing premise

The reported counts rest on the assumption that the implemented constraints—partial integration, leading-order equations of motion, Bianchi, Schouten, and Cayley-Hamilton—together with the random-point numerical rank test, capture every algebraic dependence among the generated operators; if a dependence is missed, the lists overcount independent terms.

What would settle it

Choose any term in the NNLO tables and attempt to express it as a linear combination of the others using only the stated identities; a successful reduction of a listed term (of the kind shown for the NLO octet in Eqs. (49)-(53)) would falsify minimality. Alternatively, reconstruct the coefficient matrix for each table at several random numerical points using exact rational arithmetic and compare its rank with the published counts; any rank deficit would show that some 'independent' terms are actually dependent.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The 231 independent NLO SU(3) vector-field terms, 2,172 NNLO SU(3) tensor-field terms, and 1,371 NNLO SU(3) HLS terms define the number of low-energy constants a single-vector-vertex calculation must introduce at these orders.
  • Published NLO octet lists that keep O_V^17, O_V^19, O_V^21, O_V^22 (tensor-field) or Y_17 (HLS) are overcomplete; those terms can be eliminated or traded for the corrected relations (49)-(53).
  • The tensor-field representation is substantially more economical than the vector-field representation at higher orders, so calculations that integrate out vector mesons may prefer it.
  • The auxiliary-field map yields the KSRF relation F_V = 2 G_V and expresses specific NLO HLS constants in terms of leading-order tensor-field constants, but it does not generate all NLO HLS terms, so the representations are only partially equivalent at single-vector level.
  • Because a single HLS term can correspond to tensor-field terms with different numbers of vector fields, a complete equivalence proof will require the extension to two- and multi-vector vertices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the independence counts are correct, the same generator-plus-rank method should apply immediately to two-vector vertices; a natural first check is whether any two-vector relation reduces the effective number of single-vector operators once external legs are contracted in a physical amplitude.
  • Because no code accompanies the paper, the reported bases cannot be independently re-derived from the text alone; a public implementation or a second independent enumeration would convert these counts into a checkable resource.
  • Including the singlet component makes the same Lagrangian applicable to charmonium systems such as J/psi interacting with light pseudoscalars, though the chiral power counting adopted for light vectors may need adjustment for a heavy quarkonium state.
  • A concrete way to test the physical impact of the redundancy claims is to compare a one-loop observable computed with and without the flagged terms; if the flagged terms contribute only through total derivatives or field redefinitions, the numerical results should coincide after renormalization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a systematic, computer-assisted enumeration of chiral Lagrangians with a vector-meson nonet in the vector-field, tensor-field, and hidden-local-symmetry (HLS) representations, up to NLO in the vector-field case and up to NNLO in the tensor-field and HLS cases, for both SU(2) and SU(3) and for normal and anomalous sectors. The central claims are the reported counts in Tables VIII and IX and the corresponding operator lists in the supplementary material, together with the identification of redundant terms in earlier octet analyses (Eqs. (49)-(53)). The paper also studies the tensor-field/HLS equivalence via an auxiliary-field method and derives the LO matching relations M_V=gF_\sigma, F_V=F_\sigma, G_V=F_\sigma/2 in Sec. VII.

Significance. If the enumeration is correct, this would be a valuable and essentially definitive resource: the first NNLO operator bases for vector mesons in the tensor-field and HLS representations, with explicit lists that go far beyond existing NLO octet results. The internal consistency checks that are visible are encouraging: the reported counts match the explicit tables (e.g., NLO vector-field SU(3) 136+95=231; tensor 29+22=51; HLS 45+10=55), the derived HLS/tensor-field matching in Sec. VII is dimensionally consistent, and Eq. (53) gives a concrete, checkable redundancy relation that tests the reduction machinery. The main weakness is that the load-bearing computational pipeline is not shipped: no code, no detailed protocol for the generator or the numerical rank reduction, and no explicit derivation of the algebraic identities that would justify completeness for the new HLS building blocks. Thus the significance is contingent on verifiability that the manuscript currently does not provide.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V C / Table IX] The HLS completeness statement is unsupported. After listing the EOMs (47) and the Bianchi identity (48) for V^{\mu\nu}, the text asserts 'we have established all linear relations within the HLS representation.' No analogous identities are given for the new symmetric tensors H^{\mu\nu} and \bar H^{\mu\nu} (Eqs. (43),(45)) or for \hat A^{\mu\nu}. In particular, there is no commutator identity [D_\mu,D_\nu]Y=-i[V_{\mu\nu},Y] and no Bianchi-type identity for D_\mu \hat A_{\nu\lambda}+ cyclic. If the numerical reduction used only the relations explicitly listed, the NNLO HLS counts in Table IX (SU(3): 878+493=1371; SU(2): 407+173=580) could overcount. Because these new tensors appear only in the HLS sector, this issue is load-bearing for the minimal-basis claim. Please either derive and list the missing identities or make available the code that implements them.
  2. [Sec. VI / Tables VIII-IX] The enumeration-and-reduction pipeline is not checkable from the text. The description in Sec. VI is only a sketch (number encoding of building blocks and indices), and no code, seed, random-sample protocol, or verification artifact is provided. The central counts therefore depend on two unverified assumptions: (i) the generator produced every invariant contraction, including those involving H and \bar H; and (ii) the random-point numerical rank computation is free of degeneracies and uses a complete set of relations—partial integration (10), EOMs (13)/(23)/(47), Bianchi identities (15)/(48), Schouten (20), and Cayley-Hamilton (21)-(22). A numerical rank over random points can miss dependencies that occur only in special algebraic subspaces, and no independent check is offered. Please release the generator/reduction code or provide an independent verification protocol (e.g., rational-ari
  3. [Sec. I / Conclusions] The restriction to 'single-vector-meson vertices' is stated for the vector-field and tensor-field representations, but the HLS Tables VII and XII contain many terms with multiple powers of \hat a_\parallel or V_{\mu\nu}, e.g. NLO HLS terms such as i⟨\hat a_\parallel_\mu \hat a_\parallel_\nu \hat V_{\mu\nu}⟩. If these tables are meant to be unrestricted in the number of vector lines, this should be stated explicitly; if they are meant to be single-vector, the counting criterion needs to be defined. This ambiguity affects the interpretation of the HLS counts and the comparison with the vector-field/tensor-field sectors.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. VI B] Typo: 'they 17 term from Ref. [45]' should read 'the 17th term' or 'the y_17 term'.
  2. [Sec. V C] The phrase 'Thus, we have established all linear relations within the HLS representation' is too strong given that only two types of relations are exhibited. Even if the statement is meant to summarize the numerical implementation, it should be qualified and supported by the identities mentioned in the major comments.
  3. [Table II] The table lists \hat H^{\mu\nu} and H^{\mu\nu} without clearly distinguishing them from the H^{\mu\nu} defined in Eq. (43) and \bar H^{\mu\nu} in Eq. (45). The notation in the table and the main text should be harmonized.
  4. [Sec. VII] In Eq. (59), the auxiliary-field term contains a Greek-index contraction that is not spelled out; it would help to display the Lorentz indices explicitly: (V_\mu - a_{\|,\mu} - \kappa^{-1}D^\nu W_{\nu\mu})(V^\mu - a_\parallel^\mu - \kappa^{-1}D_\lambda W^{\lambda\mu}).
  5. [General] Several references in the text are cited only by number without explicit discussion (e.g., Ref. [46] for the alternative HLS building blocks, and Refs. [101-103] for the numerical method). A few sentences explaining what is taken from each would improve readability and reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the enumeration is an independent algebraic construction checked against external literature.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are explicit lists and counts of independent chiral Lagrangian operators at NLO/NNLO. These are produced by a term generator plus a linear-relation reduction implemented numerically, not by fitting parameters or by assuming the claimed counts. The construction is validated in two independent ways: it reproduces lower-order/octet results, and it identifies redundancies in external references, e.g. Eqs. (49)-(53) remove terms from Refs. [63,66,45]. That is a check against the literature, not an import of the conclusion. The self-citations to Refs. [101-103] describe the numerical representation trick used by the same group, but the method is summarized in the text and is an algorithm rather than a theorem that presupposes the present result. The absence of shipped code makes the completeness claim difficult to audit independently, and the HLS relation set may be incomplete; those are real correctness/verifiability risks, not circularity. No load-bearing step was found in which an output is identical to an input by definition or by fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

No data fitting or LEC extraction; the constructions use standard chiral building blocks and identities. The genuinely free choices are the bookkeeping parameter κ and the HLS ratio a, neither fitted; the load-bearing unverified assumptions are the completeness of enumeration and fidelity of the numerical rank reduction. New building blocks: two symmetric HLS tensors; no new physical entities.

free parameters (2)
  • κ (auxiliary-field mixing parameter)
    Introduced by hand in Eq. (59) to connect tensor and HLS representations; arbitrary and cancels in physical relations, so it does not affect the Lagrangian bases.
  • a = F_σ²/F_π²
    Appears in the HLS equation of motion (47); the (a−1) term is part of a relation used for reduction and is not fitted here.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Leading-order equations of motion for the vector fields, Eqs. (13), (23), (47), together with the stated ordering convention (' .= '), are sufficient to eliminate all redundant derivative terms on single-vector vertices at the orders considered.
    Invoked in Secs. III B, IV, V C; if higher-order EOM corrections or missed combinations exist, the basis counts would change.
  • ad hoc to paper The numerical rank evaluation of operator traces over random points in the flavor algebra correctly determines linear (in)dependence of the operator set.
    The core of Sec. VI's method; details deferred to Refs. [101-103]; accidental numerical degeneracies would corrupt the counts in Tables VIII-XII.
  • ad hoc to paper Completeness of the enumerated operator set: every invariant contraction of the building blocks (including the new symmetric HLS building blocks H^{μν}, H̄^{μν}) was generated.
    Load-bearing for the NNLO claims; not independently checkable because the generator is not shipped.
  • domain assumption Power counting V^μ = W^{μν} = O(p^0) and tree-level analysis; loop power counting delegated to the complex-mass scheme.
    Stated in Sec. III A and the introduction; the order classification of the terms depends on this counting.
  • standard math Cayley-Hamilton (Eqs. (21)-(22)), Schouten (Eq. (20)), and Bianchi (Eqs. (15)-(19)) identities as stated.
    Standard matrix/algebra identities in four-dimensional spacetime, used for reduction and for the new relation Eq. (53).
  • domain assumption The U(3) singlet is treated with the same building blocks via trace terms; the U(1)_A anomaly is not incorporated.
    The nonet extension (Sec. II) introduces trace terms like ⟨V^μ⟩⟨...⟩ but no anomaly/Wess-Zumino handling for the singlet mass; this is the standard spectroscopic-bookkeeping assumption for such constructions.
invented entities (1)
  • Symmetric HLS building blocks H^{μν} and H̄^{μν} (Eqs. (43), (45)) no independent evidence
    purpose: Enable NNLO HLS operator enumeration with symmetric covariant-derivative index structures, which the antisymmetric A^{μν}, V^{μν} used at NLO cannot represent.
    Introduced in this paper; their necessity is asserted by the (unshipped) enumeration rather than demonstrated externally.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 132405 in / 25645 out tokens · 244560 ms · 2026-08-01T07:58:24.155609+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, chiral Lagrangians with vector meson nonet are constructed across multiple representations, including those to the next-to-leading order in the vector-field representation, as well as to the next-to-next-to-leading order in the tensor-field and hidden local symmetry representations. For the next-to-leading order octet, redundant terms in the other literature are also identified in both the tensor-field and hidden local symmetry representations. Additionally, the equivalence between the tensor-field and hidden local symmetry representations is examined.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A comment on the K_ l4 decay in the gauge nonlinear decay in the gauge nonlinear sigma model with the Wess-Zumino condition

    Furui, Shin-Ya and Kobayashi, Reido and Ujiie, Keiichi. A comment on the K_ l4 decay in the gauge nonlinear decay in the gauge nonlinear sigma model with the Wess-Zumino condition. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1986. doi:10.1143/PTP.76.963

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.76.963 1986

  2. [2]

    Constituent quark axial current couplings to light vector mesons in the vacuum and with a weak magnetic field

    Braghin, Fabio L. Constituent quark axial current couplings to light vector mesons in the vacuum and with a weak magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.054009. arXiv:2109.02203

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Pelaez, J. R. Light Meson Resonances. 2025. arXiv:2509.08648

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Chiral perturbation theory with vector mesons and the pion form factors

    Park, Tae-Sun. Chiral perturbation theory with vector mesons and the pion form factors. 2024. arXiv:2401.11638

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Complete calculation of exclusive heavy vector meson production at next-to-leading order in the dipole picture

    M. Complete calculation of exclusive heavy vector meson production at next-to-leading order in the dipole picture. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)247. arXiv:2204.14031

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Introduction to elementary particles

    Griffiths, David. Introduction to elementary particles. 2008

    2008

  7. [7]

    Workman, R. L. and Others. Review of Particle Physics. PTEP. 2022. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022

  8. [8]

    Chiral dynamics

    Schwinger, Julian S. Chiral dynamics. Phys. Lett. B. 1967. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(67)90277-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(67)90277-8 1967

  9. [9]

    and Zumino, Bruno

    Wess, J. and Zumino, Bruno. Lagrangian method for chiral symmetries. Phys. Rev. 1967. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.163.1727

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.163.1727 1967

  10. [10]

    and Geffen, D

    Gasiorowicz, S. and Geffen, D. A. Effective Lagrangians and field algebras with chiral symmetry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1969. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.41.531

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.41.531 1969

  11. [11]

    Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Effective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons

    Meissner, Ulf G. Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Effective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons. Phys. Rept. 1988. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90090-7

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90090-7 1988

  12. [12]

    and Rajeev, S

    Kaymakcalan, O. and Rajeev, S. and Schechter, J. Nonabelian Anomaly and Vector Meson Decays. Phys. Rev. D. 1984. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.594

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.594 1984

  13. [13]

    The anomalous chiral Lagrangian at order p ^ 8

    Bijnens, Johan and Hermansson-Truedsson, Nils and Ruiz-Vidal, Joan. The anomalous chiral Lagrangian at order p ^ 8. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)009. arXiv:2310.20547

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    and Blechman, Andrew E

    Petrov, Alexey A. and Blechman, Andrew E. Effective Field Theories. 2016. doi:10.1142/8619

    work page doi:10.1142/8619 2016

  15. [15]

    Burgess, C. P. Introduction to Effective Field Theory. 2020. doi:10.1017/9781139048040

    doi:10.1017/9781139048040 2020

  16. [16]

    A Primer for Chiral Perturbation Theory

    Scherer, Stefan and Schindler, Matthias R. A Primer for Chiral Perturbation Theory. 2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19254-8

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19254-8 2012

  17. [17]

    and Johnson, R

    Jain, P. and Johnson, R. and Mei ner, Ulf G. and Park, N. W. and Schechter, J. Realistic pseudoscalar vector chiral Lagrangian and its soliton excitations. Phys. Rev. D. 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3252

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3252 1988

  18. [18]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    Aad, Georges and others. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2012.08.020. arXiv:1207.7214

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Composite gauge bosons and 'low-energy theorems' of hidden local symmetries , author =. Prog. Theor. Phys. , year =

  20. [20]

    Is the meson a dynamical gauge boson of hidden local symmetry? , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , year =

  21. [21]

    Nonlinear realization and hidden local symmetries

    Bando, Masako and Kugo, Taichiro and Yamawaki, Koichi. Nonlinear realization and hidden local symmetries. Phys. Rept. 1988. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90019-1

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90019-1 1988

  22. [22]

    On the vector mesons as dynamical gauge bosons of hidden local symmetries , author =. Nucl. Phys. B , year =

  23. [23]

    and Girlanda, L

    Bijnens, J. and Girlanda, L. and Talavera, P. , journal =. The anomalous chiral. 2002 , pages =

    2002

  24. [24]

    , title =

    Bijnens, Johan and Meissner, Ulf-G. , title =

  25. [25]

    Chiral perturbation theory beyond one loop , author =. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. , year =

  26. [26]

    Electromagnetic contributions to vector meson masses and mixings , author =. Phys. Lett. B , year =

  27. [27]

    The mesonic chiral lagrangean of order p^6 , author =. J. High Energy Phys. , year =

  28. [28]

    The order p^8 mesonic chiral Lagrangian

    Bijnens, Johan and Hermansson-Truedsson, Nils and Wang, Si. The order p^8 mesonic chiral Lagrangian. J. High Energy Phys. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)102

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)102 2019

  29. [29]

    On the tensor formulation of effective vector Lagrangians and duality transformations , author =. Mod. Phys. Lett. A , year =

  30. [30]

    , journal =

    Birse, Michael C. , journal =. Effective chiral. 1996 , pages =

    1996

  31. [31]

    Borasoy, B. and Mei. Chiral. Int. J.Mod. Phys. A , year =

  32. [32]

    Chiral behavior of vector meson self energies , author =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  33. [33]

    Infrared regularization for spin-1 fields , author =. Eur. Phys. J. C , year =

  34. [34]

    and Coleman, Sidney R

    Callan, Curtis G. and Coleman, Sidney R. and Wess, J. and Zumino, Bruno , journal =. Structure of phenomenological. 1969 , pages =

    1969

  35. [35]

    The second rank tensor field, a systematic study: Classification of the second rank tensor field theories , author =. Prog. Theor. Phys. , year =

  36. [36]

    Theory and phenomenology of spin-1 chiral particles , author =. Phys. Part. Nucl. , year =

  37. [37]

    Towards a consistent estimate of the chiral low-energy constants , author =. Nucl. Phys. B , year =

  38. [38]

    and Wess, J

    Coleman, Sidney R. and Wess, J. and Zumino, Bruno , journal =. Structure of phenomenological. 1969 , pages =

    1969

  39. [39]

    On causality, unitarity and perturbative expansions , author =. Phys. Lett. B , year =

  40. [40]

    Danilkin, I. V. and Lutz, M. F. M. and Leupold, S. and Terschlusen, C. , journal =. Photon-fusion reactions from the chiral. 2013 , pages =

    2013

  41. [41]

    Path integral quantization for massive vector bosons , author =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , year =

  42. [42]

    and Gasser, J

    Ecker, G. and Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H. and Pich, A. and de Rafael, E. , journal =. Chiral. 1989 , pages =

    1989

  43. [43]

    The role of resonances in chiral perturbation theory , author =. Nucl. Phys. B , year =

  44. [44]

    Fearing, H. W. and Scherer, S. , journal =. Extension of the chiral perturbation theory meson. 1996 , pages =

    1996

  45. [45]

    and Kugo, T

    Fujiwara, T. and Kugo, T. and Terao, H. and Uehara, S. and Yamawaki, K. , journal =. Non-. 1985 , pages =

    1985

  46. [46]

    Parton distribution amplitudes of light vector mesons , author =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  47. [47]

    and Geffen, D

    Gasiorowicz, S. and Geffen, D. A. , journal =. Effective. 1969 , pages =

    1969

  48. [48]

    Annals Phys

    Chiral perturbation theory to one loop , author =. Annals Phys. , year =

  49. [49]

    and Leutwyler, H

    Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H. , journal =. Chiral perturbation theory:. 1985 , pages =

    1985

  50. [50]

    and Kaymakcalan, \"

    Gomm, H. and Kaymakcalan, \". Anomalous spin-1-meson decays from the gauged. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  51. [51]

    Guo, Xiao-Yu and Lutz, M. F.M. , journal =. On light vector mesons and chiral. 2019 , pages =

    2019

  52. [52]

    Hidden local symmetry at loop , author =. Phys. Rept. , year =

  53. [53]

    Wilsonian matching of effective field theory with underlying

    Harada, Masayasu and Yamawaki, Koichi , journal =. Wilsonian matching of effective field theory with underlying. 2001 , volume =

    2001

  54. [54]

    Chiral perturbation theory for vector mesons , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , year =

  55. [55]

    On different

    Kampf, Karol and Novotny, Jiri and Trnka, Jaroslav , journal =. On different. 2007 , pages =

    2007

  56. [56]

    Renormalization and additional degrees of freedom within the chiral effective theory for spin-1 resonances , author =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  57. [57]

    Kaymakcalan, \". Non-. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  58. [58]

    Hadronic three-body decays of light vector mesons , author =. Eur. Phys. J. A , year =

  59. [59]

    Towards an effective field theory for vector mesons

    Leupold, Stefan and Terschlusen, Carla. Towards an effective field theory for vector mesons. PoS. 2012. doi:10.22323/1.160.0024

    work page doi:10.22323/1.160.0024 2012

  60. [60]

    and others

    Navas, S. and others. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  61. [61]

    Calculation of the chiral Lagrangian coefficients with light vector mesons

    Geng, Zi-Kan and Wang, Qing. Calculation of the chiral Lagrangian coefficients with light vector mesons. 2024. arXiv:2406.10095

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    On the radiative decays of light vector and axial-vector mesons , author =. Nucl. Phys. A , year =

  63. [63]

    Hidden local symmetry and chiral effective theory for vector and axial-vector mesons , author =. Eur. Phys. J. C , year =

  64. [64]

    Low-energy hadron physics from effective chiral

    Mei. Low-energy hadron physics from effective chiral. Phys. Rept. , year =

  65. [65]

    and Petronzio, R

    Pallante, E. and Petronzio, R. , journal =. Anomalous effective. 1993 , pages =

    1993

  66. [66]

    Massive spin 1 field chiral

    Prades, Joaquim , journal =. Massive spin 1 field chiral. 1994 , pages =

    1994

  67. [67]

    hep-ph/0701248 , archiveprefix =

    Quantum corrections in the resonance chiral theory , author =. hep-ph/0701248 , archiveprefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    , journal =

    Seiberg, N. , journal =. Electric-magnetic duality in supersymmetric non-. 1995 , pages =

    1995

  69. [69]

    Chiral perturbation to one loop including the meson , author =. Phys. Lett. B , year =

  70. [70]

    Formulations of spin 1 resonances in the chiral

    Tanabashi, Masaharu , journal =. Formulations of spin 1 resonances in the chiral. 1996 , pages =

    1996

  71. [71]

    and Leupold, S

    Terschlüsen, C. and Leupold, S. and Lutz, M. F. M. , journal =. Electromagnetic transitions in an effective chiral. 2012 , pages =

    2012

  72. [72]

    Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry , author =. Phys. Rev. , year =

  73. [73]

    Phenomenological

    Weinberg, Steven , journal =. Phenomenological. 1979 , pages =

    1979

  74. [74]

    Jiang, Shao-Zhou and Ge, Feng-Jun and Wang, Qing , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  75. [75]

    Jiang, Shao-Zhou and Chen, Qing-Sen and Liu, Yan-Rui , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  76. [76]

    Jiang, Shao-Zhou and Liu, Yan-Rui and Wang, Hong-Qian , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  77. [77]

    and Schmid, Martin and Ecker, Gerhard , title =

    Haefeli, Christoph and Ivanov, Mikhail A. and Schmid, Martin and Ecker, Gerhard , title =

  78. [78]

    and Moussallam, B

    Kampf, K. and Moussallam, B. Tests of the naturalness of the coupling constants in ChPT at order p^6. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2006. doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02606-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02606-7 2006

  79. [79]

    Peeters, Kasper , title =

  80. [80]

    Cadabra2: Computer algebra for field theory revisited

    Peeters, Kasper. Cadabra2: Computer algebra for field theory revisited. J. Open Source Softw. 2018. doi:10.21105/joss.01118

    doi:10.21105/joss.01118 2018

Showing first 80 references.