Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Current-induced creation and dynamics of embedded magnetic skyrmion bags

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Electrical current pulses alone, with no applied magnetic field, create skyrmion bags with tunable topological charge in a FeGe nanoplate and drive quantized transitions between them.

desk verdict First experimental zero-field electrical creation of skyrmion bags is solid; the monopole/bobber sub-claim is honestly labeled as signatures and needs tomography. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21889 v1 pith:IOTHUV73 submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yaodong Wu , Jialiang Jiang , Lingyao Kong , Meng Shi , Shouguo Wang , Mingliang Tian , Haifeng Du , Jin Tang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords skyrmionbagstopologicalchargespin-transfertorqueFeGeLorentztransmissionelectronmicroscopyzeromagneticfieldmonopolesbobbers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that magnetic skyrmion bags — vortex-like textures that host multiple skyrmions and carry a tunable topological charge Q — can be created and manipulated purely with nanosecond electrical current pulses, at zero applied magnetic field. In a thin FeGe crystal, in-situ Lorentz transmission electron microscopy shows that current pulses convert the material's disordered helical magnetic state into a skyrmion lattice containing embedded bags of many Q values, including nested S(n1, S(n2)) bags. The sign of the topological charge is set by current polarity, and the underlying mechanism is identified as spin-transfer torque fracturing the helical state. Continued pulsing collapses individual skyrmion tubes inside the bags, giving quantized S(n) → S(n−1) transitions, with intermediate states read as magnetic monopoles and bobbers. If correct, this offers an all-electrical route to writing, manipulating, and reading high-Q topological spin textures for spintronic devices.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the spin-transfer-torque-driven instability of a vertical helix pinned at its ends: current forces a perpendicular helix, skyrmions split from its ends, and the skyrmion Hall effect accumulates them. The zero-field twofold degeneracy of skyrmions (Q = +1 and −1) is the ingredient that lets a skyrmion of one sign be encircled by a closed helix of the opposite sign, forming a bag. The notation S(n) and S(n1, S(n2)) encodes the bag's topological charge Q = n − 1 and Q = n1 − n2 — the conserved quantity whose change is quantized during current-driven tube collapse.

What would settle it

Perform tilt-series Lorentz TEM tomography across a collapsing S(0,S(2)) bag and reconstruct the 3D magnetization: if no depth-localized bobber appears, the monopole/bobber interpretation fails. Alternatively, measure the topological Hall voltage during an S(n)→S(n−1) transition and check for a step proportional to one unit of Q; a smooth change would contradict quantized charge reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a 100-nm-thick FeGe lamella at zero applied field, trains of 70-ns current pulses drive the magnetic helix into a skyrmion lattice and, because skyrmions with Q = +1 and Q = −1 are both stable at zero field, into embedded skyrmion bags — structures denoted S(n) with Q = n − 1 and nested S(n1, S(n2)) with Q = n1 − n2. The authors establish that the topological sign is controlled by current polarity through spin-transfer torque, with Joule heating and the Oersted field ruled out as primary causes. Continued pulsing induces quantized collapse of interior skyrmion tubes, converting S(n) bags into S(n − 1) bags; intermediate Fresnel-contrast states are interpreted as magnetic monopoles (tube m

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the weak dotted Fresnel contrast seen during tube collapse really is a magnetic bobber — an interpretation the paper itself says needs tilt-series 3D tomography to confirm.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Skyrmion bags can be written electrically at zero field, and because creation rests on topology and spin-transfer torque rather than material-specific parameters, the authors argue the approach should extend to room-temperature chiral magnets and multilayers with interfacial DMI.
  • Reversing the current polarity reverses the sign of Q for both skyrmions and bags, providing a simple electrical polarity switch.
  • Continued current pulses step topological charge down in integer units (S(n) → S(n−1)), so the Q value can be reduced deterministically, not just created.
  • Because the topological Hall effect scales with Q, the presence and value of a bag can in principle be read out electrically, enabling all-electrical writing and reading.
  • Skyrmion bags act as real-space tracers of skyrmion lattice rotation, giving a direct imaging-based probe of lattice dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: place a lithographic pinning site that seeds a single Q = +1 skyrmion in a Q = −1 lattice and check whether it reliably becomes an S(n) bag under the same pulse protocol; if yes, the stochastic creation becomes deterministic.
  • The bobber interpretation of the dotted Fresnel contrast could be settled by tilt-series tomography, which the authors call for; confirming it would turn current pulses into a tool for creating and moving topological point defects on demand.
  • If creation probability falls with temperature and pulse width, engineering heat dissipation (e.g., substrate choice) might widen the usable current window and raise bag yield beyond the reported ~tens of percent.
  • The observed bag rotation implies whole-lattice rotation; comparing bag angular velocities under varying pulse polarity and amplitude could separate spin-transfer-torque from thermal-gradient contributions to lattice dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports zero-field, current-induced creation of embedded skyrmion bags in 80–150 nm FeGe lamellae, using in-situ Lorentz TEM with 70-ns current pulses. The authors identify a threshold current window in which a distorted helical state transforms into a skyrmion lattice containing S(n) and nested S(n1, S(n2)) bags; reversing current polarity reverses the topological sign, and multiphysics simulations rule out Oersted-field nucleation, leaving spin-transfer torque as the ordering mechanism. They further report current-driven collapse of interior skyrmion tubes, with intermediate states interpreted as magnetic monopoles/bobbers based on matching simulated Fresnel contrast. They also provide statistical creation probabilities, energy ordering from micromagnetic simulations with literature FeGe parameters, long-term stability data, and observation of skyrmion-lattice rotation.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is the first experimental demonstration of electrical creation of skyrmion bags at zero magnetic field, a meaningful milestone for high-topological-charge spintronics. The creation evidence is strong: repeated imaging over 50 cycles, polarity-reversal controls, threshold behavior, the four predicted STT-driven regimes realized in experiment, and parameter-free micromagnetic simulations using literature FeGe parameters. The 3D monopole/bobber sub-claim is more speculative; the authors themselves limit it to 'signatures' and call for tilt-series tomography. The paper is therefore significant but needs to reconcile the strength of its wording with the evidence presented.

major comments (2)
  1. [Current-induced topological transformations (Fig. 5j-l, p-q)] The identification of the intermediate collapsed state as a magnetic bobber, and of the Y-shaped merger as a monopole-assisted event, rests on matching 1D Fresnel line profiles from a single projection. Lorentz TEM integrates magnetic contrast through the 100-nm thickness, so the inversion is non-unique; other depth-modulated textures could produce similar weak dotted contrast. The manuscript itself states that unambiguous 3D reconstruction requires tilt-series tomography (final paragraph of Results). Consequently, the sentence describing 'providing experimental proof for the stabilization of complex 3D topological spin textures' overstates what the data support. Please revise the Results to use the more cautious 'consistent with' / 'signatures' language, or add additional evidence such as simulated projections of plausible alternative 3D textures or tomographic data.
  2. [Abstract and Discussion] The abstract claims 'experimental signatures of magnetic monopoles and bobbers,' while the Results text claims 'experimental proof.' This internal inconsistency is not merely stylistic; it affects how readers weigh the 3D-defect sub-claim, which is a load-bearing part of the paper's novelty. The Discussion already uses the appropriate 'signatures' framing. Please harmonize the strength of claims throughout the manuscript, adopting the more cautious wording unless new evidence is added.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section heading 'Introductions'] Typo: should be 'Introduction'.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption contains garbled text, e.g., 'bobber (1)S(1)), 1 tubeS(0, S2 merging tubes(2)), 2 tubesS(0, S'. The labels (a)-(q) are also unclear. Please reformat the caption so that panels are correctly identified and the notation is readable.
  3. [Fig. 2e and main text] The notation 'S(S(n))' used in Fig. 2e is inconsistent with the 'S(n1, S(n2))' notation used elsewhere. Please define the nesting explicitly in both the figure and the text.
  4. [Methods / Fig. 4a] The 'optimal current density' j_opt is referenced frequently but never explicitly defined in the main text. State the actual value used (e.g., 4.5×10^10 A/m^2 for 70-ns pulses) and note that it is an empirical choice.
  5. [Fig. 3a/c and TIE analysis] The in-plane magnetization maps and the resulting Q values are obtained through transport-of-intensity equation (TIE) analysis, which assumes weak-phase projection. Please state this assumption explicitly where the Q assignments are first presented, since the claimed topological charges rely on this reconstruction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the current-induced creation and Q-transition claims are supported by controlled experiments and parameter-free simulations, and the bobber/monopole interpretation is explicitly hedged as signatures rather than definitive proof.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are based on direct Lorentz TEM observations of current-induced skyrmion-bag creation and quantized transformations, supported by micromagnetic simulations whose material parameters (Ms = 384 kA/m, Aex = 3.25 pJ/m, Ddmi = 0.5834 mJ/m^2 from the zero-field spiral period) are taken from the literature, not fitted to the headline observations. The STT-driven creation mechanism is presented as a set of four symmetry-derived dynamical predictions that are then reproduced experimentally (Supplementary Figs. 10-11), which is a genuine prediction rather than a circular reduction. The energy ordering of S(n) and nested bags is computed from the same free-energy model and compared with observed formation probabilities; this is model-based explanation, not fitting the target result. The assignment of topological charge Q follows directly from the defined counting S(n), Q = n-1, using TIE-retrieved in-plane magnetization, and is not used as an input to derive the observed creation. The bobber/monopole identification is based on matching simulated Fresnel contrast to experimental line profiles; while this is model-dependent interpretation and underdetermined by 2D projection imaging, the paper explicitly states that these are 'experimental signatures rather than definitive proof' and calls for future tilt-series Lorentz TEM tomography, so it is not presented as a derived prediction that reduces to its input. Self-citations (e.g., refs 16, 19, 33, 34) provide prior experimental and interpretive context for distinguishing 3D solitons in Lorentz TEM; they are not the load-bearing justification for the creation or Q-reduction claims. Overall, no load-bearing step is equivalent by construction to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no free parameters to its central observation. It relies on standard micromagnetics, literature material parameters, and interpretive contrast-matching for the 3D sub-claim, plus an empirically selected current protocol.

free parameters (1)
  • Operating/optimal current density j_opt = ~4.5 × 10^10 A/m^2 for 70 ns pulses (reset at 5.5-5.6 × 10^10 A/m^2)
    Selected empirically from current-density sweeps (Supplementary Figs 1-2); an experimental operating point, not a parameter in the theoretical derivation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Micromagnetic energy functional (exchange + DMI + demagnetization) adequately models FeGe, with parameters A=3.25 pJ/m, D=0.5834 mJ/m^2, Ms=384 kA/m from literature refs 57/32.
    Used in MuMax3 simulations of equilibrium textures, energies, and Fresnel contrast matching. If the material parameters are inaccurate, the simulated bag energies and 3D contrast interpretations shift.
  • domain assumption Zhang-Li spin-transfer torque dominates current-driven dynamics; Joule heating and Oersted field do not set the topological polarity.
    Justified via current-polarity reversal and multiphysics simulations (Supplementary Figs 7-9), but depends on FeGe lacking adjacent heavy-metal layers, so spin-orbit torques are absent.
  • domain assumption The two-fold degeneracy of Q=±1 skyrmions at zero field provides the opposite-sign seeds needed to assemble skyrmion bags.
    Central to the creation mechanism; relies on their LTEM observation of oppositely charged seeds in the initial disordered helix state.
  • domain assumption Fresnel-contrast matching against micromagnetic simulations identifies 3D bobbers and monopoles.
    The paper explicitly labels these as 'experimental signatures' and says tilt-series tomography is needed for unambiguous 3D reconstruction; contrast matching is model-dependent and not direct evidence.
  • domain assumption Skyrmion Hall effect and helix-end instabilities determine skyrmion motion, accumulation, and helix fracture.
    Taken from cited prior work (refs 37-39); the selective polarity rule and the four predicted dynamic schemes depend on this force analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Current-induced creation and dynamics of embedded magnetic skyrmion bags." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IOTHUV73

@misc{pith2026260721889,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Current-induced creation and dynamics of embedded magnetic skyrmion bags},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IOTHUV73}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21889}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic skyrmion bags-vortex-like structures hosting multiple skyrmions with tunable topological charge (Q)-hold significant promise for next-generation spintronic computing. However, while their creation using magnetic fields has been demonstrated, their direct electrical generation remains an outstanding challenge. Here, we report the direct current-induced formation and manipulation of embedded skyrmion bags in a FeGe nanoplate under zero magnetic field. Using in-situ Lorentz transmission electron microscopy, we capture the transformation of a distorted helical ground state into embedded skyrmion bags with diverse configurations, driven by nanosecond current pulses. Theoretical analysis indicates that this process is driven by the spin-transfer-torque-induced fracture of the helical state. Furthermore, we demonstrate electrically-induced transitions between skyrmion bags of different Q, leading to the stabilization of complex three-dimensional topological structures, including experimental signatures of magnetic monopoles and bobbers. Our work establishes a foundation for all-electrical control of high-Q topological spin textures and topological defects, paving the way for their application in functional spintronic devices.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references

  1. [1]

    & Tokura, Y

    Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y . Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899-911, (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    & Hubert, A

    Bogdanov, A. & Hubert, A. The stability of vortex -like structures in uniaxial ferromagnets. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 182-192, (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915-919, (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Nayak, A. K. et al. Magnetic antiskyrmions above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials. Nature 548, 561-566, (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Kezsmarki, I. et al. Neel-type skyrmion lattice with confined orientation in the polar magnetic semiconductor GaV4S8. Nat. Mater. 14, 1116-1122, (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Woo, S. et al. Observation of room -temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current -driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 15, 501-506, (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Zheng, F. et al. Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in B 20-type FeGe. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 451-455, (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nature 564, 95-98, (2018)

    2018

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    & Kläui, M

    Finocchio, G., Büttner, F., Tomasello, R., Carpentieri, M. & Kläui, M. Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 423001, (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    & Cros, V

    Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V . Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031, (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Everschor -Sitte, K., Masell, J., Reeve, R. M. & Kläui, M. Perspective: magnetic skyrmions—overview of recent progress in an active research field. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901, (2018). 19

    2018

  4. [12]

    Christian, H. B. et al. The 2020 Skyrmionics Roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53, 363001, (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    & Tretiakov, O

    Göbel, B., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles. Phys. Rep. 895, 1-28, (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    & Kanazawa, N

    Tokura, Y . & Kanazawa, N. Magnetic Skyrmion Materials. Chem. Rev. 121, 2857-2897, (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Marrows, C. H. & Zeissler, K. Perspective on skyrmion spintronics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 250502, (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Tang, J. et al. Sewing skyrmion and antiskyrmion by quadrupole of Bloch points. Science Bulletin 68, 3000, (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Foster, D. et al. Two-dimensional skyrmion bags in liquid crystals and ferromagnets. Nat. Phys. 15, 655-659, (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Rybakov, F. N. & Kiselev, N. S. Chiral magnetic skyrmions with arbitrary topological charge. Phys. Rev. B 99, 064437, (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Tang, J. et al. Magnetic skyrmion bundles and their current-driven dynamics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1086–1091, (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Tang, J. et al. Skyrmion‐Bubble Bundles in an X ‐Type Sr2Co2Fe28O46 Hexaferrite above Room Temperature. Adv. Mater. 35, 2306117, (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Zhang, Y . et al. Stable skyrmion bundles at room temperature and zero magnetic field in a chiral magnet. Nature communications 15, 3391, (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Powalla, L. et al. Seeding and Emergence of Composite Skyrmions in a van der Waals Magnet. Adv. Mater. 35, 2208930, (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Chen, R., Li, Y ., Pavlidis, V . F. & Moutafis, C. Skyrmionic interconnect device. Physical Review Research 2, 043312, (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Hassan, M. et al. Dipolar skyrmions and antiskyrmions of arbitrary topological charge at room temperature. Nat. Phys. 20, 615-622, (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Jiang, J. et al. Stable Néel -Twisted Skyrmion Bags in a van der Waals Magnet Fe3 –xGaTe2 at Room Temperature. Nano Lett. 25, 3282-3290, (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Yang, L. et al. Embedded Skyrmion Bags in Thin Films of Chiral Magnets. Adv. Mater. 36, (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Liu, Q. et al. Room-temperature creation and conversion of individual skyrmion bags in magnetic multilayered disks. Nature communications 16, (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Zheng, F. et al. Hopfion rings in a cubic chiral magnet. Nature 623, 718-723, (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Bo, L. et al. Controllable creation of skyrmion bags in a ferromagnetic nanodisk. Phys. Rev. B 107, (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Zhang, S. & Li, Z. Roles of nonequilibrium conduction electrons on the magnetization dynamics of ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204, (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    Milde, P. et al. Unwinding of a skyrmion lattice by magnetic monopoles. Science 340, 1076-1080, (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Near room -temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin -films of the helimagnet FeGe. Nat. Mater. 10, 106-109, (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    & Tian, M

    Tang, J., Kong, L., Wang, W., Du, H. & Tian, M. Lorentz transmission electron microscopy for magnetic skyrmions imaging. Chin. Phys. B. 28, 087503, (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Tang, J. et al. Two-dimensional characterization of three -dimensional nanostructures of magnetic bubbles in Fe3Sn2. Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa200, (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Schoenherr, P. et al. Topological domain walls in helimagnets. Nat. Phys. 14, 465-468, (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    A., Ke, L

    Kim, T.-H., Zhao, H., Jensen, B. A., Ke, L. & Zhou, L. Topological defect mediated helical phase 20 reorientation by uniaxial stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136704, (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Zhao, X. et al. Current-Induced Magnetic Skyrmions with Controllable Polarities in the Helical Phase. Nano Lett. 22, 8793-8800, (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Jiang, W. et al. Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 13, 162-169, (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Litzius, K. et al. Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by direct time -resolved X -ray microscopy. Nat. Phys. 13, 170-175, (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    & Che, R

    Zhao, X., Wang, S., Wang, C. & Che, R. Thermal effects on current-related skyrmion formation in a nanobelt. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 212403, (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Birch, M. T. et al. Topological defect -mediated skyrmion annihilation in three dimensions. Communications Physics 4, (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Birch, M. T. et al. Real-space imaging of confined magnetic skyrmion tubes. Nature Communications 11, 1726, (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Seki, S. et al. Direct visualization of the three -dimensional shape of skyrmion strings in a noncentrosymmetric magnet. Nat. Mater. 21, 181-187, (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Wolf, D. et al. Unveiling the three -dimensional magnetic texture of skyrmion tubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 250, (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Phatak, C., Petford -Long, A. K. & De Graef, M. Three -Dimensional Study of the Vector Potential of Magnetic Structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 253901, (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    Yao, Y . et al. Chirality flips of skyrmion bubbles. Nature Communications 13, 5991, (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Zhang, S. L. et al. Manipulation of skyrmion motion by magnetic field gradients. Nature Communications 9, 2115, (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Everschor, K. et al. Rotating skyrmion lattices by spin torques and field or temperature gradients. Phys. Rev. B 86, 054432, (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Mochizuki, M. et al. Thermally driven ratchet motion of a skyrmion microcrystal and topological magnon Hall effect. Nat. Mater. 13, 241-246, (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Bruno, P., Dugaev, V . K. & Taillefumier, M. Topological Hall effect and Berry phase in magnetic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 096806, (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Neubauer, A. et al. Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602, (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    Kurumaji, T. et al. Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet. Science 365, 914-918, (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Chen, S. et al. All-electrical skyrmionic magnetic tunnel junction. Nature 627, 522-527, (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Li, S. et al. Experimental demonstration of skyrmionic magnetic tunnel junction at room temperature. Science Bulletin 67, 691-699, (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Guang, Y . et al. Electrical detection of magnetic skyrmions in a magnetic tunnel junction. Advanced Electronic Materials 9, 2200570, (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Vansteenkiste, A. et al. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Advances 4, 107133, (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Du, H. et al. Interaction of individual skyrmions in a nanostructured cubic chiral magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 197203, (2018). Fundings 21 This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China, Grant No. 2022YFA1403603 (H.D.); the Scientific Research Innovation Ca...

    2018

  50. [58]

    Wilhelm, H. et al. Scaling study and thermodynamic properties of the cubic helimagnet FeGe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 144424 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    & Che, R

    Zhao, X., Wang, S., Wang, C. & Che, R. Thermal effects on current -related skyrmion formation in a nanobelt. Applied Physics Letters 112, 212403 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Arblaster, J. W. Selected Values of the Crystallographic Properties of Elements . (ASM International, 2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Strouse, G. F. Standard Platinum Resistance Thermometer Calibrations from the Ar TP to the Ag FP. NIST (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.