Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Accelerating grain boundary modelling and simulation by automated pre-evaluation of the irreducible macroscopic representation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For any CSL grain-boundary character in a cubic crystal, the paper defines an irreducible monoclinic supercell whose size, computed without building atoms, identifies boundaries that sit at energy cusps and mobility transitions.

desk verdict Clever pre-screening idea for GB simulations, but a mis-defined formula and an unproven 'irreducible' claim undercut the results as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22090 v1 pith:MZMCTCTD submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Wei Wan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 61.72.Mm
keywords grainboundarycoincidentsitelatticeirreduciblesupercellCSLcharacterstructure-propertyrelationshipatomisticsimulationstructuralparticularityaluminium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that every coincidence-site-lattice (CSL) grain-boundary character in a cubic crystal has an irreducible macroscopic representation: the smallest parallelogram supercell that satisfies both grains' periodicity, computable directly from the geometric character without building atoms. It argues that this minimal supercell size can be used as a pre-screening number: a small irreducible cell signals a structurally simple boundary, and such boundaries are the special ones in the five-dimensional grain-boundary landscape. The claim is tested on a series of aluminium mixed grain boundaries, where the flagged characters indeed sit at local energy minima and mark transitions in mobility trends. If correct, the method lets researchers rank the immense space of boundary characters for computational cost and scientific interest before running any expensive atomistic simulation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the irreducible macroscopic representation: a pair of in-plane lattice-vector systems {w,v} for the two grains that generate the smallest parallelogram supercell simultaneously compatible with both crystals. The workhorse operation is an integer trial loop that forms candidate vectors as combinations of the two orthogonal in-plane vectors, rotates both grains in lockstep, and sorts the candidates by length so that the two shortest non-parallel pairs can be assigned to w and v. Three constraints filter the candidates: the CSL constraint (equal lengths in both grains), the rotation-invariance constraint (equal in-plane angles), and the irreducible-representation constrain

What would settle it

For a fixed CSL character, increase the number of trial rotations N until the reported S_IR stops changing, then compute an independent rigorous reduction of the 2D lattice generated by the boundary-plane vectors; if any valid parallelogram cell with smaller area exists, the algorithm's 'irreducible' label fails. A direct test is to compare S_IR against the true primitive-cell area for a set of high-Sigma characters; any mismatch refutes the claim of minimality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that every CSL grain-boundary character in a cubic lattice admits an irreducible macroscopic representation: two pairs of shortest valid lattice vectors, one pair for each grain, that together define a monoclinic supercell with the smallest possible in-plane area. The algorithm finds these vectors by rotating the two grains' in-plane lattice orientations in lockstep over a list of integer trial combinations, then selecting the two shortest non-parallel candidate pairs that satisfy the CSL length equalities and rotation-invariance constraints. The resulting irreducible supercell size S_IR is shown to be smaller than the conventional orthogonal supercell and often

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the finite list of integer trial rotations always contains the two truly shortest lattice-vector pairs that generate a primitive cell for the given CSL character; the paper gives no bound on the number of trials and no proof that these two vectors form the irreducible basis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Supercells for atomistic simulations of CSL grain boundaries can be made smaller than orthogonal representations, directly reducing the computational cost for complex mixed boundaries.
  • Because S_IR is computed before any atomistic run, it enables pre-evaluation of the vast five-dimensional grain-boundary character space, flagging characters that deserve detailed structural study.
  • The aluminium mixed-boundary results indicate that low-S_IR characters tend to sit at energy cusps and at transitions in mobility trends, so prioritizing them in high-throughput sampling should capture the main features of structure-property relationships.
  • A weighted sampling strategy built on S_IR can balance comprehensive coverage of the character space against the need to focus resources on structurally particular boundaries.
  • The normalized, material-independent form of S_IR allows the geometric ranking to be transferred across cubic materials without re-running the geometry search.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the minimality guarantee is made rigorous, S_IR could serve as a universal geometric descriptor for structure-property machine-learning models, reducing reliance on expensive atomistic labels.
  • Editorial inference: the finite-N integer scan could be replaced by a proven lattice-basis reduction; this would convert the algorithm from a heuristic search to an exact computation and would remove the main robustness concern.
  • Editorial inference: the same pre-evaluation logic could extend beyond CSL boundaries and cubic lattices, where a similarly defined minimal-cell size might still correlate with structural complexity and property anomalies.
  • Editorial inference: because S_IR is material-independent after normalization, rankings built on aluminium data may transfer to other fcc metals, but the energy and mobility links would need re-validation for each interatomic potential.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an automated algorithm to construct a so-called irreducible macroscopic representation of CSL grain-boundary characters in cubic lattices. The algorithm searches for short in-plane lattice vector pairs by integer linear combinations of the two grain orientations, defines a 2D 'irreducible supercell size' S_IR, and claims this parameter can pre-screen which GB characters are structurally particular, i.e., likely to sit at energy cusps or mobility transitions. The method is applied to 14 GBs from the Homer dataset for supercell-size and energy comparisons, and to two families of aluminum mixed GBs (Σ5 <001> and Σ9 <011>) to test correlations between S_IR and GB energy/mobility. The paper concludes that low S_IR identifies special GBs and presents a weighted sampling strategy for high-throughput GB exploration.

Significance. If correct, the algorithm would be a cheap geometric pre-screening tool that reduces supercell sizes and prioritizes potentially special GBs before expensive atomistic structure searches, which is a useful contribution to GB engineering and high-throughput simulation. The comparison with the Homer dataset and the independent LAMMPS energy calculations are credible in spirit, and the idea of using a purely geometric size parameter as a particularity indicator is attractive. However, the central quantitative definition of S_IR contains an apparent area-formula error, and the claim that the finite search yields a true irreducible representation is not supported by any completeness proof. The validation is also weakened by the fact that the same S_IR criterion selects the GBs that are then used to demonstrate the criterion's predictive power. These issues are load-bearing because the paper's main claims—that the method finds the irreducible representation and that S_IR predicts structural particularity—rest on them.

major comments (3)
  1. [Algorithm procedure, Eq. (6)] The area of a 2D parallelogram with side lengths L_w and L_v and included angle θ is L_w L_v sin(θ), not L_w L_v cos(θ). As written, Eq. (6) gives zero for perpendicular w and v, which are the most common orthogonal supercells and are used elsewhere in the paper. The nonzero entries in Table A1 and the S_IR curves in Figure 3 cannot therefore be the values defined by Eq. (6). This is not a typo of merely cosmetic importance: S_IR is the central parameter used for all rankings and for the structural-particularity predictions. The manuscript must correct this definition and verify that the numerical results, Table A1, and Figure 3 are recomputed consistently.
  2. [Equations (3.1)–(3.4) and Eq. (4)] The term 'irreducible' is used repeatedly, but no proof is given that the first and second shortest vector pairs obtained from the finite N-trial search in Eq. (4) form a primitive basis of the coincident-site 2D lattice. The text does not state how N is chosen, how the integer pairs (α_m, β_m) are enumerated, or why the two shortest nonparallel candidate pairs from this finite set must coincide with the true reduced basis for every CSL character. Without a completeness bound or a proper lattice-reduction argument, S_IR is at best a heuristic upper bound on the minimal 2D cell area, and the particularity rankings built on it are not grounded. This is the key theoretical gap in the paper's central claim.
  3. [Structural particularity section, Figure 3] The validation of the structural-particularity prediction is weaker than claimed because the same S_IR criterion is used to select which GBs are called 'special', and then those same GBs are inspected to confirm that they are energy minima or mobility transitions. This selection procedure can inflate the apparent success rate even if S_IR has no predictive power beyond the training set. A stronger test would be to compute energies and mobilities for all 25 interpolated GBs in each family (or for a held-out set) and report correlations between S_IR and energy/mobility without pre-filtering. In addition, the demonstration is limited to two 1D angular scans (Σ5 <001> and Σ9 <011>), whereas the abstract claims a prediction across the 'vast 5D space'; additional sampling dimensions or a clear statement of the intended scope are needed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'across the vast 5D space' overstates what is demonstrated: the structural-particularity tests in Figure 3 vary only the inclination angle for two fixed disorientation axes and Σ values. Please qualify the claim to reflect the actual validation.
  2. [Eq. (4)] The operation in Eq. (4) is called 'rotating' x^p and x^q, but the formula is an integer linear combination α x + β y. The terminology is misleading; suggest 'generating rational in-plane lattice directions' or similar.
  3. [Data availability] The algorithm is implemented in 'private Fortran code GB-SG.f90' available only 'upon reasonable request'. For a methods paper whose central contribution is an algorithm, this is not sufficiently reproducible. The code, or at least a pseudocode listing with the exact enumeration of N and (α_m, β_m), should be included or deposited.
  4. [Table A1] The table has two separate series both numbered 1–25 with identical column headers. It needs a clear split or a single ID column to avoid ambiguity about which rows belong to Σ5 and which to Σ9.
  5. [Eq. (7)] The user-defined weight W is introduced without any guidance or sensitivity analysis. Since the weighted sampling scheme is a secondary contribution, a brief discussion of how W affects the selected GB set would be useful.
  6. [Figure 3(c)] The mobility data show relatively large error bars at several points, and the claim that the marked GBs represent 'transitions between different mobility trends' is visually suggestive but not statistically quantified. Please add a quantitative measure, e.g., local slope changes or a fit comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the geometric supercell parameter is defined independently of the energies and mobilities used for validation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the geometric irreducible supercell size S_IR can pre-evaluate which GB characters are structurally special, and this is validated by atomistic energies and mobilities. The derivation of S_IR (Eqs. 4-6) depends only on integer lattice vectors, rotation constraints, and sorting candidate pair lengths; it does not use GB energy, mobility, or any fitted parameter called a prediction. The energy and mobility are computed independently with LAMMPS using an EAM potential and a published synthetic driving force, and the parity plot against the Homer dataset is an external benchmark. The weighted sampling uses S_IR with a user-set threshold and W=0.5, but the tested quantities γ and M are outputs of independent simulations, not inputs to the algorithm. The comparisons against the Banadaki-Patala method and the orthogonal supercell are direct geometric comparisons. Self-citations [23] and [24] are code/method references for constructing GBs and are not load-bearing for the particularity prediction, nor do they import a uniqueness theorem. The lack of a completeness bound on the finite-N trial search in Eq. (4) is a correctness/rigor concern about minimality of S_IR, not a circularity: the parameter is still defined by an explicit independent computation, and the energy/mobility validation does not presuppose it. Therefore no equation-level or definitional circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main quantitative contribution rests on three unstated/free choices: the search size N, the 'special' threshold S_Sigma_iIR^t, and the weight W. The physical-intuition axiom connecting small S_IR to structural particularity is the conceptual engine of the prediction, but it is not derived or independently supported beyond the paper's own examples.

free parameters (3)
  • N
    Number of rational rotation trials in Eq. (4); no value or convergence criterion is given, yet the claim of finding the irreducible cell depends on N being large enough.
  • S_Sigma_iIR^t
    User-designated threshold used to classify GB characters as 'special'; never specified, which makes the special/non-special split in the validation non-reproducible.
  • W = 0.5 in the application
    User-input weight in Eq. (7) that trades computational cost against representativeness; not derived from data, and the choice of 0.5 is not justified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A CSL grain-boundary character is fully captured by a pair of integer transformation matrices with equal in-plane lengths in the two grains.
    Standard CSL modelling assumption used in Eqs. (1.1)-(3.1) to set up the candidate search.
  • ad hoc to paper The two shortest candidate pairs from the finite N-search in Eq. (4) form a primitive/irreducible cell for every cubic CSL character.
    Unproved; the 'irreducible' label and the S_IR rankings rest on this search being exhaustive and the shortest vectors forming a basis.
  • ad hoc to paper Low S_IR implies simple structural units and hence special structure-property relationships.
    Explicitly introduced as 'physical intuition' in the Weighted sampling section and used as the basis for the particularity prediction.
  • domain assumption The Mishin EAM potential for Al accurately reproduces the relevant GB energies and mobilities.
    All validation energies and mobilities in Figures 2-3 are computed with this potential; no convergence or uncertainty analysis is provided.
  • domain assumption Periodic-boundary sizes Lx > 12a and Ly > 12a remove size effects in the mobility simulations.
    Stated in the Structural particularity section without a systematic size-convergence study.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Accelerating grain boundary modelling and simulation by automated pre-evaluation of the irreducible macroscopic representation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MZMCTCTD

@misc{pith2026260722090,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Accelerating grain boundary modelling and simulation by automated pre-evaluation of the irreducible macroscopic representation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MZMCTCTD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22090}
}
read the original abstract

A major challenge in the modelling and simulation of grain boundaries (GBs) is the conflict between the system size and computation capability, which inherently restricts the computationally accessible boundary characters. We present an algorithm to find the irreducible macroscopic representation of any given coincident-site-lattice GB character in the cubic lattice, and thus determine the irreducible size of its supercell. The algorithm is compared with the conventional orthogonal supercell and a published calculation method to assess its merits in saving computational resources. This supercell size parameter can be used to predict which GB character is relatively special across the vast 5D space, as those GBs possess small structural units are likely to exhibit particular structure-property relationships that are worthy of attention. The prediction is confirmed by examining the energy and mobility trends of aluminum mixed GBs obtained from the atomistic simulations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references

  1. [1]

    The Deformation and Ageing of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results

    Hall, E.O. The Deformation and Ageing of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 1951, 64, 747–753

    1951

  2. [2]

    The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals

    Petch, N.J. The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 1953, 174, 25–28

    1953

  3. [3]

    Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening

    Hansen, N. Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scripta Mater. 2004, 51, 801–806

    2004

  4. [4]

    Watanabe, S.; Abe, T.; Obana, T

    Chiba, A.; Hanada, S. ; Watanabe, S.; Abe, T.; Obana, T. Relation between ductility and grain-boundary character distributions in Ni3al. Acta Metall. Mater. 1994, 42, 1733–1738

    1994

  5. [5]

    Role of diffusion-induced grain boundary migration in the oxidation response of a Ni-30 Cr alloy

    Xue, F.; Marquis, E.A. Role of diffusion-induced grain boundary migration in the oxidation response of a Ni-30 Cr alloy. Acta Mater. 2022, 240, 118343

    2022

  6. [6]

    Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering

    Shimada, M.; Kokawa, H.; Wang, Z.J.; Sato, Y .S.; Karibe, I. Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 2331–2341

    2002

  7. [7]

    Thermal transport across Twin Grain Boundaries in Polycrystalline Graphene from Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics Simulations

    Bagri, A.; Kim, S.P.; Ruoff, R.S.; Shenoy, V .B. Thermal transport across Twin Grain Boundaries in Polycrystalline Graphene from Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3917–3921

    2011

  8. [8]

    Ultrahigh Strength and High Electrical Conductivity in Copper

    Lu, L. Ultrahigh Strength and High Electrical Conductivity in Copper. Science 2004, 304, 422–426

    2004

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Grain boundary engineering: an overview after 25 years

    Randle, V . Grain boundary engineering: an overview after 25 years. Mater. Sci. Tech.-Lond. 2010, 26, 253–261

    2010

  2. [10]

    Engelberg, D.L.; Newman, R.C.; Marrow, T. J. Effect of thermomechanical process history on grain boundary control in an austenitic stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 2008, 59, 554–557

    2008

  3. [11]

    An approach to grain boundary design for strong and ductile polycrystals

    Watanabe, T. An approach to grain boundary design for strong and ductile polycrystals. Res. Mech. 1984, 11, 47

    1984

  4. [12]

    Effect of grain boundary engineering on microstructural stability during annealing

    Schlegel, S.M.; Hopkins, S.; Frary, M. Effect of grain boundary engineering on microstructural stability during annealing. Scripta Mater. 2009, 61, 88–91

    2009

  5. [13]

    A study of low-strain and medium-strain grain boundary engineering

    Randle, V .; Coleman, M. A study of low-strain and medium-strain grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 3410–3421

    2009

  6. [14]

    Grain boundary energy anisotropy: a review

    Rohrer, G.S. Grain boundary energy anisotropy: a review. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46(18), 5881–5895

    2011

  7. [15]

    Grain boundary engineering by application of mechanical stresses

    Winning, M. Grain boundary engineering by application of mechanical stresses. 2006, 54(6), 987–992

    2006

  8. [16]

    Grain boundary plane distributions and single-step versus multiple-step grain boundary engineering

    Randle, V .; Jones, R. Grain boundary plane distributions and single-step versus multiple-step grain boundary engineering. 11 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 524, 134–142

    2009

  9. [17]

    Universality of grain boundary phases in fcc metals: Case study on high- angle [111] symmetric tilt grain boundaries

    Brink, T.; Langenohl, L.; Bishara, H.; Dehm, G. Universality of grain boundary phases in fcc metals: Case study on high- angle [111] symmetric tilt grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107(5), 054103

    2023

  10. [18]

    Predicting phase behavior of grain boundaries with evolutionary search and machine learning

    Zhu, Q.; Samanta, A.; Li, B.; Rudd, R.E.; Frolov, T. Predicting phase behavior of grain boundaries with evolutionary search and machine learning. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9(1), 467

    2018

  11. [19]

    Asta, M

    Frolov, T.; Olmsted, D.L. ; Asta, M. ; Mishin, Y . Structural phase transformations in metallic grain boundaries . Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1899

    2013

  12. [20]

    Observations of grain-boundary phase transformations in an elemental metal

    Meiners, T.; Frolov, T.; Rudd, R.E.; Dehm, G.; Liebscher, C.H. Observations of grain-boundary phase transformations in an elemental metal. Nature 2020, 579(7799), 375–378

    2020

  13. [21]

    Grain-boundary metastability and its statistical properties

    Han, J.; Vitek, V .; Srolovitz, D.J. Grain-boundary metastability and its statistical properties. Acta Mater. 2016, 104, 259– 273

    2016

  14. [22]

    Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1982

    Hirth, J.P.; Lothe, J. Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1982

    1982

  15. [23]

    Structures and energies of computed silicon (001) small angle mixed grain boundaries as a function of three macroscopic characters

    Wan, W.; Tang, C.X. Structures and energies of computed silicon (001) small angle mixed grain boundaries as a function of three macroscopic characters. Acta Mater. 2023, 261, 119353

    2023

  16. [24]

    Can we predict mixed grain boundaries from their tilt and twist components

    Wan, W.; Tang, C.X.; Homer, E.R. Can we predict mixed grain boundaries from their tilt and twist components . Acta Mater. 2024, 279, 120293

    2024

  17. [25]

    Segregation-induced ordered superstructures at general grain boundaries in a nickel -bismuth alloy

    Yu, Z.Y .; Cantwell, P.R.; Gao, Q.; Yin, D.; Zhang, Y .Y .; Zhou, N.X.; Rohrer, G.S.; Widom, M.; Luo, J.; Harmer, M.P . Segregation-induced ordered superstructures at general grain boundaries in a nickel -bismuth alloy. Science 2017, 358, 97–101

    2017

  18. [26]

    In situ atomistic observation of disconnection- mediated grain boundary migration

    Zhu, Q.; Cao, G.; Wang, J.W.; Deng, C.; Li, J.X.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, S.X. In situ atomistic observation of disconnection- mediated grain boundary migration. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 156

    2019

  19. [27]

    In situ atomistic observation of grain boundary migration subjected to defect interaction

    Zhu, Q.; Zhao, S.C.; Deng, C.; An, X.H.; Song, K.X.; Mao, S.X.; Wang, J.W. In situ atomistic observation of grain boundary migration subjected to defect interaction. Acta Mater. 2020, 199, 42–52

    2020

  20. [28]

    Revealing grain boundary kinetics in three-dimensional space

    Chen, Y .B.; Han, J.; Deng, H.L.; Cao, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, H.F.; Srolovitz, D.J.; Wang, J.W. Revealing grain boundary kinetics in three-dimensional space. Acta Mater . 2024, 268, 119717

    2024

  21. [29]

    Finding the low-energy structures of Si[001] symmetric tilted grain boundaries with a genetic algorithm

    Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Ho, K. Finding the low-energy structures of Si[001] symmetric tilted grain boundaries with a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 174102

    2009

  22. [30]

    Revisiting the structures and energies of silicon <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries

    Wang, L.; Y u, W.S.; Shen, S.P. Revisiting the structures and energies of silicon <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries. J. Mater. Res. 2019, 34(6), 1021–1033

    2019

  23. [31]

    Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property

    Chen, K.T.; Han, J.; Thomas, S.L.; Srolovitz, D.J. Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property. Acta Mater. 2019, 167, 241–247

    2019

  24. [32]

    Examination of computed aluminium grain boundary structures and energies that span the 5D space of crystallographic character

    Homer, E.R.; Hart, G.L.W.; Owens, C.B.; Hensley, D.M.; Spendlove, J.C.; Serafinb, L.H. Examination of computed aluminium grain boundary structures and energies that span the 5D space of crystallographic character. Acta Mater. 2022, 234, 118006

    2022

  25. [33]

    Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries

    Read, W.T.; Shockley, W. Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. 1950, 78(3), 275–289

    1950

  26. [34]

    On the structural unit model of grain boundary structure

    Sutton, A.P . On the structural unit model of grain boundary structure. Philos. Mag. Lett. 1989, 59(2), 53–59

    1989

  27. [35]

    The grain-boundary structural unit model redux

    Han, J.; Vitek, V .; Srolovitz, D.J. The grain-boundary structural unit model redux. Acta Mater. 2017, 133, 186–199

    2017

  28. [36]

    A three -dimensional polyhedral unit model for grain boundary structure in fcc metals

    Banadaki, A.D.; Patala, S. A three -dimensional polyhedral unit model for grain boundary structure in fcc metals. npj Comput. Mater. 2017, 3(1), 13

    2017

  29. [37]

    Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries

    Rosenbrock, C.W.; Homer, E.R.; Csányi, G.; Hart, G.L.W. Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries. npj Comput. Mater. 2017, 3(1), 29

    2017

  30. [38]

    Quantifying and connecting atomic and crystallographic grain boundary structure using local environment representation and dimensionality reduction techniques

    Priedeman, J.L.; Rosenbrock, C.W.; Johnson, O.K.; Homer, E.R. Quantifying and connecting atomic and crystallographic grain boundary structure using local environment representation and dimensionality reduction techniques. Acta Mater. 2018, 161, 431–443

    2018

  31. [39]

    A simple approach to atomic structure characterization for machine learning of grain boundary structure-property models

    Snow, B.D.; Doty, D.D.; Johnson, O.K. A simple approach to atomic structure characterization for machine learning of grain boundary structure-property models. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 054104

    2019

  32. [40]

    Insights into grain boundary energy structure -property relationships by examining 12 computed [1 0 0] disorientation axis grain boundaries in Nickel

    Erickson, H.C.; H omer, E.R. Insights into grain boundary energy structure -property relationships by examining 12 computed [1 0 0] disorientation axis grain boundaries in Nickel. Scr. Mater. 2020, 185, 165–169

    2020

  33. [41]

    Artificial neural network molecular mechanics of iron grain boundaries, Scr

    Shiihara, Y .; Kanazawa, R.; Matsunaka, D.; Lobzenko, I.; Tsuru, T.; Kohyama, M.; Mori, H. Artificial neural network molecular mechanics of iron grain boundaries, Scr. Mater. 2021, 207, 114268

    2021

  34. [42]

    Universal function for grain boundary energies in BCC metals

    Chirayutthanasak, O.; Sarochawikasit, R.; Khongpia, S.; Okita, T.; Dangtip, S.; Rohrer, G.S.; Ratanaphan, S. Universal function for grain boundary energies in BCC metals. Scr. Mater. 2024, 240, 115821

    2024

  35. [43]

    GBstudio: a builder software on periodic models of CSL boundaries for molecular simulation

    Ogawa, H. GBstudio: a builder software on periodic models of CSL boundaries for molecular simulation. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 2706–2710

    2006

  36. [44]

    Visualization and analysis of crystal structures using crystalmaker software

    Palmer, D.C. Visualization and analysis of crystal structures using crystalmaker software. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2015, 230, 559

    2015

  37. [45]

    Aimsgb: An algorithm and open -source python library to generate periodic grain boundary structures

    Cheng, J.L.; Luo, J.; Yang, K.S. Aimsgb: An algorithm and open -source python library to generate periodic grain boundary structures. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 155, 92–103

    2018

  38. [46]

    Atomsk: A tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files, Comput

    Hirel, P. Atomsk: A tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files, Comput. Phys. Comm. 2015, 197, 212–219

    2015

  39. [47]

    The generating function for coincidence site lattices in the cubic system

    Grimmer, H. The generating function for coincidence site lattices in the cubic system. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Adv. 1984, 40, 108–112

    1984

  40. [48]

    Structure -energy correlation for grain boundaries in F .C.C

    Wolf, D. Structure -energy correlation for grain boundaries in F .C.C. Metals—IV . Asymmetrical twist (General) boundaries. Acta Metall. Mater. 1990, 38, 791–798

    1990

  41. [49]

    Symmetries in the representation of grain boundary plane distributions

    Patala, S.; Schuh, C.A. Symmetries in the representation of grain boundary plane distributions. Philos. Mag. 2013, 93(5). 524–573

    2013

  42. [50]

    Grain boundary plane orientation fundamental zones and structure -property relationships

    Homer, E.R.; Patala, S.; Priedeman, J.L. Grain boundary plane orientation fundamental zones and structure -property relationships. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15476

    2015

  43. [51]

    An efficient algorithm for computing the primitive bases of a general lattice plane

    Banadaki, A.D.; Patala, S. An efficient algorithm for computing the primitive bases of a general lattice plane . J. Appl. Cryst. 2015. 48, 585–588

    2015

  44. [52]

    Mehl, M.J

    Mishin, Y .; Farkas, D. ; Mehl, M.J. ; Papaconstantopoulos, D.A. Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59(5), 3393–3407

    1999

  45. [53]

    LAMMPS -a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales

    Thompson, A.P.; Aktulga, H.M.; Berger, R.; Bolintineanu, D.S.; Brown, W.N.; Crozier, P.S.; Veld, P.J.I.; Kohlmeyer, A.; Moore, S.G.; Nguyen, T.D.; Shan, R.; Stevens, M.J.; Tranchida, J.; Trott, C.; Plimpton, S.J. LAMMPS -a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials ...

    2021

  46. [54]

    On grain boundary dislocations and ledges

    Hirth, J.P.; Balluffi, R.W. On grain boundary dislocations and ledges. Acta Metall. 1973, 21, 929–942

    1973

  47. [55]

    The grain boundary mobility tensor

    Chen, K.T.; Han, J.; Pan, X.Q.; Srolovitz, D.J. The grain boundary mobility tensor . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117(9) 4533–4538

    2020

  48. [56]

    Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms

    Martyna, G.J.; Tobias, D.J.; Klein, M.L. Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101(5), 4177–4189

    1994

  49. [57]

    Ulomek, F.; O’Brien, C. J. ; Foiles, S. M. ; Mohles, V . Energy conserving orientational force for determining grain boundary mobility. Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 2015, 23, 025007

    2015

  50. [58]

    P.; von Pezold, J.; Neugebauer, J

    Race, C. P.; von Pezold, J.; Neugebauer, J. Role of the mesoscale in migration kinetics of flat grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. B. 2014, 89, 214110

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.