Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

A master-potential construction makes nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one dimension consistent with non-Gaussian equilibrium measures.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

The paper builds effective field theories of one-dimensional hydrodynamics from a master potential that enforces thermodynamic symmetry, and numerically solves a non-Gaussian two-mode model showing superdiffusion.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection Genuinely new master-potential construction for non-Gaussian NLFHD, with a numerical demonstration that is plausible but not yet backed by stationarity checks in the production regime. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22527 v1 pith:2W2DCLNH submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.stat-mech

Effective field theories of nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one dimension

Matija Koterle , Enej Ilievski This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech PACS 05.60.-k05.40.-a05.70.Ln
keywords nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamicssuperdiffusive transporteffective field theoryMaxwell relationfluctuation-dissipation relationstochastic Langevin equationsnon-Gaussian stationary measureone-dimensional transport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that standard nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics (NLFHD) in one dimension is internally inconsistent: the reversible current, truncated at quadratic nonlinearities and calibrated to a Gaussian equilibrium measure, does not preserve the exact stationary measure of the underlying microscopic system, causing spurious drift and numerical blow-up. The fix is to construct the reversible current as a functional derivative of a master potential of the thermodynamic forces, which automatically enforces the Maxwell relation at the effective-theory level and guarantees a stationary non-Gaussian measure when combined with gradient-flow dissipation and matched noise. The authors present a numerical integration scheme that solves the resulting stochastic PDEs and demonstrate on a two-mode model the expected superdiffusive exponent z1=3/2 and diffusive z2=2. This gives a general and stable computational framework for non-Gaussian NLFHD, applicable to systems such as anharmonic oscillator chains.

Core claim

The central claim is that the reversible component of the hydrodynamic current in 1D nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics must be derived from a master potential G[γ] via JR^a = δG/δγ_a, rather than from a polynomial expansion with arbitrary coefficients. This manifestly enforces the Maxwell relation (symmetry of the current-charge static correlator B) at the level of the effective theory, ensuring that the truncated EFT has a stationary non-Gaussian equilibrium measure. The authors show that previous formulations, which calibrate to Gaussian measures or ignore higher-order nonlinearities, cannot preserve the exact stationary measure and generically produce spurious drift or blow-up in simula

What carries the argument

The master potential G[γ], an ultralocal functional of the nonlinear thermodynamic forces γ_a = δS_eq[ψ]/δψ_a, together with the prescription JR^a = δG/δγ_a. Any such construction gives a symmetric current-charge correlator and hence satisfies the Maxwell relation at both bare and dressed levels. The dissipative current is chosen as a gradient flow of the same entropy functional, with noise covariance σ=2D. In the minimal two-mode model, the entropy density is quartic and the master potential is quadratic, producing cubic reversible currents and a nonlinear dissipative current that stabilizes the dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that truncating the entropy functional at quartic order and the currents at cubic order, while discarding gradient terms in the reversible current and Burnett terms in the dissipative current, still captures the exact leading long-time behavior of the microscopic dynamics; if any of those discarded terms becomes relevant under renormalization, the predicted exponents and scaling functions would be invalid.

What would settle it

Solve the same EFT including a quintic entropy term or a gradient term in the reversible current and check whether the dynamical exponent z1 departs from 3/2, or compare the stationary equal-time cumulants produced by the truncated EFT with the exact stationary measure of a microscopic model, for instance via long deterministic chain simulations.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Provides a general recipe for building 1D hydrodynamic EFTs with non-Gaussian stationary measures, removing the Gaussian restriction of prior NLFHD.
  • Yields a stable numerical scheme for solving the resulting stochastic PDEs, enabling direct computation of dynamical structure factors and scaling exponents.
  • Shows that bare velocities and coupling tensors differ from dressed transport coefficients, with an explicit velocity shift observable in simulations.
  • Reproduces mode-coupling-equation predictions such as z1=3/2 and z2=2 in a minimal two-mode model, supporting the framework's consistency.
  • Opens a route to translating microscopic static data into EFT parameters via Legendre inversion for physical systems like anharmonic oscillator chains.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same master-potential construction may extend to higher dimensions or to EFTs that retain gradient terms in the reversible current, although the paper truncates those terms.
  • The numerical scheme could be used to test whether vertex renormalization beyond one-loop mode-coupling theory alters scaling functions or exponents in regimes where the mode-coupling approximation is uncertain.
  • The demonstration of spurious drift in Gaussian-calibrated models suggests that some earlier NLFHD simulations may have been probing transient non-Gaussian states; re-examining them with this framework could change reported exponents.
  • If the truncation at quartic entropy and cubic currents proves insufficient at very long times, the framework would need to include the discarded gradient and Burnett terms, which the authors note are needed for detailed balance at all times.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper revisits nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics (NLFHD) in one dimension and argues that the conventional form of the reversible current, Eq. (2), does not preserve non-Gaussian stationary measures. The authors propose a construction in which the reversible current is derived from a master potential G[γ] through J_R^a = δG/δγ_a (Eq. (11)), which manifestly enforces the Maxwell relation and stationarity at the EFT level. The dissipative current is taken as a gradient flow in the thermodynamic forces with FDR-compatible noise. A minimal two-mode model with a quartic non-Gaussian stationary measure is introduced (Eqs. (14)–(16)) and integrated numerically. The reported dynamical structure factors yield z1 = 3/2 and z2 = 2, with a Gaussian scaling function for mode 2. The paper claims this is the first successful numerical solution of NLFHD for systems with non-Gaussian equilibrium states.

Significance. If the numerical results are fully validated, this is a significant advance: it extends NLFHD beyond Gaussian stationary measures and gives a systematic way to satisfy the Maxwell relation, a requirement that previous formulations did not enforce. The formal derivation of Eq. (19) from the master potential is clean, and the numerical implementation is described in unusual detail in the Supplemental Material, including explicit discretizations and Metropolis sampling. The minimal model also provides a useful testbed for mode-coupling predictions. However, the central empirical claim — that the scheme solves non-Gaussian NLFHD — rests on numerical evidence whose stationarity has only been checked in a much smaller and shorter simulation than the production runs.

major comments (3)
  1. [End Matter, Numerical implementation; SM Fig. 6; Fig. 1/2] The stationarity validation is performed at N=128, t≤100, Δt=0.01 (SM Fig. 6), while the production runs used to extract z1 and z2 (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) use N=8192, t≤8000, Δt=0.04, i.e., roughly 200,000 time steps. The manuscript itself states that the spatial discretization does not generically preserve the discretized stationary measure and that exact measure preservation is 'a challenging problem'. The SM also admits that 'strictly speaking all C^(n) and M^(n) must be tested'. As a consequence, the equal-time measure in the production regime could drift away from the target P_eq, and the observed scaling collapses could be influenced by the nonlinear damping terms in the discretization rather than by the continuum EFT. The authors should provide stationarity checks (C^(2) contact form and M^(n) for n=2,3,4) at production parameters, or otherwise demonstrate Δt-convergence of the runnin
  2. [SM Eqs. (C16) and (C18)] The discretization of the nonlinear reversible term R^(3) and of the nonlinear dissipative term ∂_x γ is a specific choice (centered endpoint averages and nearest-neighbor differences) that is not shown to converge to the continuum current in the limit Δt, Δx→0, nor to preserve any discrete version of the stationary measure. This choice is load-bearing, because the central claim is precisely that the scheme gives a faithful numerical solution of the continuum EFT. I ask for a convergence study: fix a moderate N (e.g., 1024 or 2048), compute z_a(t) for Δt ∈ {0.04, 0.02, 0.01, 0.005} and, if feasible, for two different discretizations of the same continuum current, and show that the exponents and scaling functions are stable within statistical uncertainty.
  3. [Main text, after Eq. (6); SM Appendix C (general case)] The framework's predictive power relies on the assumption that the discarded terms — gradient terms in J_R, Burnett-type terms in J_D, and higher-order nonlinearities beyond the quartic truncation of S_eq and the cubic truncation of J_R — are irrelevant for the long-time behavior. The manuscript does not provide a Renormalization-Group argument or a numerical sensitivity test for this assumption. Since the paper presents the minimal model as a benchmark rather than as a full microscopic theory, the claims should be scoped accordingly; if the authors wish to claim that the framework supersedes previous NLFHD for generic interacting systems, this relevance assumption needs direct evidence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 and End Matter] The running exponents z_a(t) are smoothed with a Gaussian window over five points, but no error bars or sample-to-sample statistical uncertainties are reported. Please provide error estimates for z_1, z_2 and D_2, and state the number of independent samples used for the error estimate.
  2. [End Matter, Eq. (18)] The change of variables from ψ to γ in the functional integral assumes a (at least locally) invertible Legendre transformation. For the quartic potential with cubic terms, it would be useful to state the domain of validity or to note that the identity can also be checked order by order in the nonlinearities.
  3. [Main text, Eq. (14)] Calling G[γ] = 1/2 c(γ1^2 - γ2^2) a 'linear master potential' is confusing, since it is quadratic in γ and gives linear currents. Please rename it, e.g., 'bilinear master potential'.
  4. [SM Eq. (A3)] There appears to be a duplicated term in the Fokker–Planck equation as printed; please check the formula.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the master-potential construction is a self-consistent ansatz, and the numerical exponents are checked against external mode-coupling benchmarks rather than fitted from the model.

full rationale

The paper's central formal step is the introduction of the master potential G[γ] with J_R^a = δG/δγ_a (Eq. 11), followed by the proof that this implies the Maxwell symmetry B_ab = B_ba via integration by parts (End Matter, Eqs. 17–19). This is a derivation from the ansatz, not an assumption of the conclusion. The minimal model is openly constructed: S_eq is chosen (Eq. 14), a linear G is chosen, and stationarity is stated to hold 'by design'. The paper does not claim to derive S_eq or G from a microscopic Hamiltonian in the present work; that is deferred to an outlook. The headline exponents z1 = 3/2 and z2 = 2 are not extracted by fitting the model to itself; they are compared with independent MCE predictions (Refs. [25,35]) and with the expected KPZ/diffusive behavior of a self-coupling mode. The dressed diffusion constant D2 ≈ 1.32 is reported as a renormalized output, not as a prediction of the framework from bare inputs. Ref. [39] is a self-citation 'in preparation', but it appears only in the outlook for future microscopic application via Legendre inversion, so it is not load-bearing for the derivation or the numerical demonstration. The main weakness is evidentiary rather than circular: the End Matter admits that 'stochastic difference-differential equations do not generically preserve the discretized stationary measure of the continuum model', exact measure preservation is called 'a challenging problem', and the stationarity validation (SM Fig. 6) is at N=128, t≤100 while production runs use N=8192, t≤8000. That undercuts the strength of the 'first successful numerical solution' claim, but it is a question of numerical evidence and convergence, not a reduction of the prediction to its own inputs. No step was found in which a fitted, cited, or definitional input is renamed as an independent output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an ansatz-based EFT construction; it does not derive hydrodynamic coefficients from a microscopic Hamiltonian. The framework assumes local equilibrium, a master-potential form of reversible currents, gradient-truncated dissipative terms, and a quartic truncation of the entropy. Minimal-model parameters are chosen by hand; no microscopic input or independent data are used.

free parameters (6)
  • c = 0.5
    Bare sound speed in the minimal model; chosen by hand, not derived from a microscopic model.
  • λ = 1.0
    Self-coupling parameter of the cubic term; chosen to generate the superdiffusive self-coupling.
  • χ = 0.1
    Off-diagonal cubic coupling; chosen by hand to tune mode-2 coupling.
  • κ = 1.0
    Quartic confining coupling in the equilibrium measure; chosen by hand.
  • D♭_a = 1 (diagonal)
    Bare diagonal diffusion constants set to 1; the dressed D2≈1.32 is an output, not an input.
  • h (tilt chemical potentials) = (-1.1303, 0)
    Chosen to enforce zero mean in finite volume; numerical detail rather than physics.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Local equilibrium: microscopic correlators are reconstructed from hydrodynamic EFT correlators via UV-IR matching (Eq. 5).
    The paper assumes hydrodynamic fields capture late-time microscopic correlation functions; not derived.
  • domain assumption The reversible current can be expressed as a gradient of a master potential G[γ] with symmetric tensors (Eq. 11); this is the key ansatz ensuring the Maxwell relation.
    Discussed in the main text and End Matter; it restricts the space of admissible EFTs.
  • domain assumption Discarding gradient terms in J_R and higher-order Burnett terms in J_D is valid at leading order for late-time relaxation.
    Explicitly stated in the main text; these terms can matter at smaller wavelengths.
  • standard math Dissipative current is gradient flow of the same entropy functional with σ=2D♭ (FDR).
    Standard fluctuation-dissipation relation; used to cancel dissipative/noise terms in the Fokker-Planck equation (A5).
  • standard math Functional integration by parts with vanishing boundary terms is valid in the derivation of Eq. (19).
    End Matter Eqs. (18)-(19); assumes boundary terms vanish on a periodic domain.
  • domain assumption The ultra-local equilibrium measure factorizes on the lattice; Metropolis sampling converges to the exact one-site measure.
    SM Appendix D; used for numerical initial conditions.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncation of the entropy functional at quartic order and currents up to cubic order is sufficient for the minimal model and approximate in general.
    Main text and SM: 'we truncate the measure at K♭(4)' and neglect higher orders; no systematic error estimate is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Spatial discretization of the A♭(3) term (centered endpoint averages, SM Eq. C18) is a valid representation of the continuum theory.
    SM states this term is 'not fixed strictly by thermodynamic relations'.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective field theories of nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2W2DCLNH

@misc{pith2026260722527,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective field theories of nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2W2DCLNH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22527}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Describing emergent macroscopic phenomena in low spatial dimensions is known to be notoriously challenging, primarily due to strong interactions that render perturbative approaches inapplicable. On the other hand, low-dimensional systems host a wealth of unorthodox phenomena. A prominent example is the emergence of superdiffusive transport in one-dimensional interacting systems, traditionally studied in the framework of nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics. After identifying and discussing internal inconsistencies in the previous formulations, in this work we develop a general and systematic approach for constructing effective field theories of one-dimensional hydrodynamic systems in the form of coupled stochastic Langevin-type equations compatible with the physical requirements of local equilibrium states such as the thermodynamic Maxwell relation and fluctuation-dissipation symmetry. We implemented a general numerical integration scheme and exemplified our construction on a simple model of two interacting hydrodynamic modes with a non-Gaussian stationary equilibrium measure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22527 by Enej Ilievski, Matija Koterle.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Stationarity of a Gaussian equilibrium state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dynamical generation of nonzero cumulants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Stability of the cyclic (left panel) and the consistent (right panel) numerical schemes. The panels show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stationarity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The left panel shows a ratio of the exact and Metropolis-sampled distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dy- namic critical phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics 49, 435–479 (1977)

    1977

  2. [2]

    Berthier and G

    L. Berthier and G. Biroli, Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials, Reviews of Modern Physics83, 587–645 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Halpin-Healy and Y.-C

    T. Halpin-Healy and Y.-C. Zhang, Kinetic roughening phenomena, stochastic growth, directed polymers and all that. aspects of multidisciplinary statistical mechanics, Physics Reports254, 215–414 (1995)

    1995

  4. [4]

    Krug, Origins of scale invariance in growth processes, Advances in Physics46, 139–282 (1997)

    J. Krug, Origins of scale invariance in growth processes, Advances in Physics46, 139–282 (1997)

    1997

  5. [5]

    Bertini, A

    L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, Macroscopic fluctuation theory, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 593–636 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Kardar, G

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Dynamic scal- ing of growing interfaces, Physical Review Letters56, 889–892 (1986)

    1986

  7. [7]

    Quastel and H

    J. Quastel and H. Spohn, The one-dimensional kpz equa- tion and its universality class, Journal of Statistical Physics160, 965–984 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Corwin, Kardar-parisi-zhang universality, Notices of the American Mathematical Society63, 230–239 (2016)

    I. Corwin, Kardar-parisi-zhang universality, Notices of the American Mathematical Society63, 230–239 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    K. A. Takeuchi, An appetizer to modern developments on the kardar–parisi–zhang universality class, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications504, 77–105 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Lepri, R

    S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Heat conduction in chains of nonlinear oscillators, Physical Review Letters 78, 1896–1899 (1997)

    1997

  11. [11]

    Lepri, R

    S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, On the anomalous ther- malconductivityofone-dimensionallattices,Europhysics Letters (EPL)43, 271–276 (1998)

    1998

  12. [12]

    Lepri, R

    S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Universality of anoma- lous one-dimensional heat conductivity, Physical Review E68, 10.1103/physreve.68.067102 (2003). 6

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.68.067102 2003

  13. [13]

    Spohn, The phonon boltzmann equation, properties and link to weakly anharmonic lattice dynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics124, 1041–1104 (2006)

    H. Spohn, The phonon boltzmann equation, properties and link to weakly anharmonic lattice dynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics124, 1041–1104 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    T. Mai, A. Dhar, and O. Narayan, Equilibration and uni- versal heat conduction in fermi-pasta-ulam chains, Phys- ical Review Letters98, 10.1103/physrevlett.98.184301 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.184301 2007

  15. [15]

    Spohn, Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for an- harmonic chains, Journal of Statistical Physics154, 1191–1227 (2014)

    H. Spohn, Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for an- harmonic chains, Journal of Statistical Physics154, 1191–1227 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Lepri, R

    S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Anomalous transport in the fermi-pasta-ulam-tsingou model: a review and open problems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15512 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Minami, H

    Y. Minami, H. Nakano, and K. Saito, Symmetry-based nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one dimension, Physical Review Letters136, 10.1103/2z9s-5d7w (2026)

    work page doi:10.1103/2z9s-5d7w 2026

  18. [18]

    C. B. Mendl and H. Spohn, Dynamic correlators of fermi- pasta-ulam chains and nonlinear fluctuating hydrody- namics, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 230601 (2013)

    2013

  19. [19]

    H. Spohn, Fluctuating hydrodynamics approach to equi- librium time correlations for anharmonic chains, inTher- mal Transport in Low Dimensions(Springer Interna- tional Publishing, 2016) p. 107–158

    2016

  20. [21]

    Doyon, Hydrodynamic noise in one dimension: pro- jected kubo formula and its vanishing in integrable mod- els, arXiv e-prints , arXiv (2025)

    B. Doyon, Hydrodynamic noise in one dimension: pro- jected kubo formula and its vanishing in integrable mod- els, arXiv e-prints , arXiv (2025)

    2025

  21. [22]

    SeeSupplementalMaterialformoredetailsonthenumer- ical implementation and for additional numerical analy- sis

  22. [23]

    van Beijeren, Exact results for anomalous transport inone-dimensionalhamiltoniansystems,PhysicalReview Letters108, 10.1103/physrevlett.108.180601 (2012)

    H. van Beijeren, Exact results for anomalous transport inone-dimensionalhamiltoniansystems,PhysicalReview Letters108, 10.1103/physrevlett.108.180601 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.180601 2012

  23. [24]

    Popkov, J

    V. Popkov, J. Schmidt, and G. M. Schütz, Universality classes in two-component driven diffusive systems, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics160, 835–860 (2015)

    2015

  24. [25]

    Popkov, A

    V. Popkov, A. Schadschneider, J. Schmidt, and G. M. Schütz,Exactscalingsolutionofthemodecouplingequa- tions for non-linear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one di- mension, Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and ex- periment2016, 093211 (2016)

    2016

  25. [26]

    Popkov, A

    V. Popkov, A. Schadschneider, J. Schmidt, and G. M. Schütz, Fibonacci family of dynami- cal universality classes, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences112, 12645 (2015), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1512261112

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1512261112 2015

  26. [27]

    R. M. Grisi and G. M. Schütz, Current symmetries for particle systems with several conservation laws, Journal of Statistical Physics145, 1499–1512 (2011)

    2011

  27. [28]

    Doyon and H

    B. Doyon and H. Spohn, Drude weight for the lieb- liniger bose gas, SciPost Physics3, 10.21468/scipost- phys.3.6.039 (2017)

    doi:10.21468/scipost- 2017

  28. [29]

    Karevski and G

    D. Karevski and G. Schütz, Charge-current correlation equalities for quantum systems far from equilibrium, Sci- Post Physics6, 10.21468/scipostphys.6.6.068 (2019)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.6.6.068 2019

  29. [30]

    Doyon and J

    B. Doyon and J. Durnin, Free energy fluxes and the kubo–martin–schwinger relation, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2021, 043206 (2021)

    2021

  30. [31]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, Effective field the- ory of dissipative fluids, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 10.1007/jhep09(2017)095 (2017)

    doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)095 2017

  31. [32]

    P.GloriosoandH.Liu,Lecturesonnon-equilibriumeffec- tive field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09331 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [33]

    Glorioso, L

    P. Glorioso, L. Delacrétaz, X. Chen, R. Nandkishore, and A. Lucas, Hydrodynamics in lattice models with continuous non-abelian symmetries, SciPost Physics10, 10.21468/scipostphys.10.1.015 (2021)

    doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.1.015 2021

  33. [34]

    A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, and L. V. Delacrétaz, Corrections to diffusion in interacting quantum systems, Physical Review X14, 10.1103/physrevx.14.031020 (2024)

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.031020 2024

  34. [35]

    Spohn and G

    H. Spohn and G. Stoltz, Nonlinear fluctuating hydrody- namics in one dimension: the case of two conserved fields, Journal of Statistical Physics160, 861 (2015)

    2015

  35. [36]

    D. Roy, A. Dhar, K. Khanin, M. Kulkarni, and H. Spohn, Universality in coupled stochastic burgers systems with degenerate flux jacobian, Journal of Statistical Mechan- ics: Theory and Experiment2024, 033209 (2024)

    2024

  36. [37]

    Schmidt, Johannes and Krajnik, Žiga and Popkov, Vladislav, Universality in many-body driven systems with an umbilic point, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 083202 (2025)

    2025

  37. [38]

    Schmidt, Johannes and Krajnik, Žiga and Popkov, Vladislav, Universality in driven systems with a multiply- degenerate umbilic point, Journal of Statistical Mechan- ics: Theory and Experiment2026, 033202 (2026)

    2026

  38. [39]

    Koterle and E

    M. Koterle and E. Ilievski (2026), [in preparation]

    2026

  39. [40]

    Feldmeier, P

    J. Feldmeier, P. Sala, G. De Tomasi, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Anomalous diffusion in dipole- and higher- moment-conserving systems, Physical Review Letters 125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.245303 (2020)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.245303 2020

  40. [41]

    Gromov, A

    A. Gromov, A. Lucas, and R. M. Nandkishore, Fracton hydrodynamics, Physical Review Research2, 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033124 (2020)

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033124 2020

  41. [42]

    Meerson, Relaxation and fluctuations of a mass- and dipole-conserving stochastic lattice gas, Physical Review Research6, 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033242 (2024)

    B. Meerson, Relaxation and fluctuations of a mass- and dipole-conserving stochastic lattice gas, Physical Review Research6, 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033242 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033242 2024

  42. [43]

    Prelovšek, S

    P. Prelovšek, S. Nandy, and M. Mierzejewski, Einstein re- lation for subdiffusive relaxation in stark chains, Physical Review B110, 10.1103/physrevb.110.l081105 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.l081105 2024

  43. [45]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, Transport in out-of-equilibriumxxzchains: Exact pro- files of charges and currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 207201 (2016)

    2016

  44. [46]

    Bastianello, B

    A. Bastianello, B. Doyon, G. Watts, and T. Yoshimura, Generalized hydrodynamics of classical integrable field theory: the sinh-gordon model, SciPost Physics4, 10.21468/scipostphys.4.6.045 (2018)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.4.6.045 2018

  45. [47]

    Doyon, Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslect- notes.18 (2020)

    B. Doyon, Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslect- notes.18 (2020)

    doi:10.21468/scipostphyslect- 2020

  46. [48]

    Bastianello, Alvise and Krajnik, Žiga and Ilievski, Enej, Landau-lifschitz magnets: Exact thermodynamics and transport, Physical Review Letters133, 10.1103/phys- revlett.133.107102 (2024)

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2024

  47. [49]

    A. L. Garcia, J. B. Bell, A. Nonaka, I. Srivastava, D. Ladiges, and C. Kim, An introduction to com- putational fluctuating hydrodynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12157 (2024). 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [50]

    Srivastava, D

    I. Srivastava, D. R. Ladiges, A. J. Nonaka, A. L. Garcia, and J. B. Bell, Staggered scheme for the compressible fluctuatinghydrodynamicsofmultispeciesfluidmixtures, Physical Review E107, 10.1103/physreve.107.015305 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.107.015305 2023

  49. [51]

    Delong, B

    S. Delong, B. E. Griffith, E. Vanden-Eijnden, and A. Donev, Temporal integrators for fluctuating hydro- dynamics, Phys. Rev. E87, 033302 (2013). END MA TTER Maxwell relation from master potential We show that Bab(x, y)≡ ⟨JR a (x)ψb(y)⟩c Peq = Z Dψj a[ψ(x)]ψb(y)Peq[ψ],(17) is symmetric, i.e.B ab(x, y) =B ba(y, x). Using the conjugate fieldsγ a(x) =δS eq[γ]...

    2013

  50. [52]

    − X b D♭ ab∂x δSeq δψa − X b 1 2 σab∂x δ δψa # Peq =

    F okker-Planck formalism Given the equation of motion for the fieldsψ={ψ1(x), . . . ψNQ (x)}and the ultra-local equilibrium measurePeq ∂tψa +∂ xJa[ψ] = 0,P eq[ψ] =Z −1 exp (−Seq[ψ]),S eq[ψ] = Z dxS[ψ],(A1) the currents are decomposed into reversible (non entropy producing), dissipative (entropy producing) and noise parts J R a [ψ] +J D a [ψ] +ξ a. We repr...

  51. [53]

    − ∞X n=1 1 n! X i1...in Ki1...in Z dxdr2 . . .drnψi1 (x)ψi2 (x+r 2). . . ψin (x+r n) nY m=2 δ(rm) # = exp

    Automatically stationary models The stationarity condition checks when the above integrand can be written as a total derivative. We can instead suppose an ansatz which automatically gives stationary EFTs at the bare and dressed level. Introducing new variables δSeq/δψi =γ i(x), the stationarity condition reads X a J R a ∂xγa(x) =∂ xV(A17) The key idea is ...

  52. [54]

    There exist many discretiza- tions which, in the continuum limit∆x→0, have the same properties as the parent field theory

    Cyclic case The main problem of integration is the construction of a spatial discretization scheme. There exist many discretiza- tions which, in the continuum limit∆x→0, have the same properties as the parent field theory. There are exceptional discretizations, that can preserve the same properties for any∆x. We first discuss the simplest case, where J R ...

  53. [55]

    Numerically, this can be shown by taking a random non-cyclic Hessian, e.g

    General case In the general case, whereA♭ (2) is not cyclic, the measure does not truncate at the Gaussian level. Numerically, this can be shown by taking a random non-cyclic Hessian, e.g. A♭ 1|bc = 0.867347−0.901744 −0.901744−0.494479 , A ♭ 2|bc = −0.902914 0.864401 0.864401 2.21188 ,(C14) and computingM (n) which start to deviate from the predictionMab ...

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.