Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 32 references

Supermoir\'e-trapped quadrupolar exciton

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A WS2/WSe2/WS2 heterotrilayer's supermoiré pattern creates periodic aligned pockets that trap quadrupolar excitons, making their formation robust to twist-angle mismatch.

desk verdict A credible experimental report of quadrupolar excitons in a trilayer with a supermoiré-trapping interpretation that hinges on an untested rigid-lattice assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22532 v1 pith:FUWSQ675 submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics

Anish Kumar , Suman Chatterjee , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Kausik Majumdar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords quadrupolarexcitonsupermoirémoirésuperlatticeStarkeffecttwist-anglerobustnessWS2/WSe2heterotrilayerconfinementdarkbrightening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that in a three-layer WS2/WSe2/WS2 stack, the supermoiré pattern produced by the two independent moiré interfaces is not a nuisance but a resource: at points where the top and bottom moiré trapping sites coincide, the two anti-parallel interlayer excitons can couple into a quadrupolar exciton. It claims this trapping makes quadrupolar exciton formation robust to unintentional twist-angle mismatch, which would otherwise degrade the vertical Coulomb coupling needed for hybridization. The supporting evidence includes a hyperbolic Stark shift with hybridization energy δ ≈ 11.5 meV, a dark anti-symmetric branch that brightens and blueshifts under an electric field, three zero-field moiré-confined levels, and a supermoiré density extracted from gating (4.98 × 10^11 cm^-2) that matches the value calculated from measured twist angles. A six-state moiré–moiré coupling Hamiltonian reproduces the observed field dispersion. If this holds, trilayer heterostructures become a more forgiving and more tunable platform for studying multipolar excitonic states.

What carries the argument

The supermoiré pattern, defined as the interference of the two moiré superlattices at the two interfaces, selects the locations where the top and bottom moiré trapping sites overlap. The quantitative model is the 6×6 Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) coupling three confined levels of the top moiré ladder to three of the bottom ladder with field-dependent site energies ±e·d·F and coupling constants t_i. The hyperbolic dispersion E±(F) = ∓√((edF)^2 + δ^2) is the signature of the quadrupolar state and is used to extract δ ≈ 11.5 meV; the field-dependent electron–hole overlap calculation explains why the anti-symmetric branch brightens with field.

What would settle it

Direct structural imaging of the WS2/WSe2/WS2 stack (scanning tunnelling microscopy or electron diffraction) showing that local atomic registries do not follow the rigid supermoiré lattice predicted from the flake-edge twist angles—for example, reconstructed domains with no periodic aligned pockets—would falsify the supermoiré-trapping attribution, even though the hyperbolic Stark shift could still arise from field-driven hybridization of the two interlayer excitons.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the supermoiré—the periodic interference of the two moiré lattices at the top and bottom interfaces—creates pockets of vertically aligned atomic registries. In those pockets, the interlayer excitons of the two interfaces (IXu and IXd) are coupled; their degenerate electron states hybridize through the middle WSe2 layer into symmetric (bright) and anti-symmetric (dark) quadrupolar states. Because the top and bottom moiré sites drift in and out of alignment with a long period, there is always some region where they overlap, which is why exact angle alignment is not required. The paper shows three confined moiré levels hybridizing into three bright symmetric and three

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the layers stay rigid and unreconstructed, so the supermoiré pattern computed from the measured twist angles really describes the local atomic registries; in real small-twist TMD stacks atoms can rearrange, which would alter or destroy those aligned pockets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quadrupolar exciton formation no longer requires precise twist-angle alignment; unintentional mismatch in a trilayer is sufficient because the supermoiré always supplies overlapping moiré sites.
  • Electric field acts as a switch between a bright symmetric branch (redshifting, dimming) and a dark anti-symmetric branch (blueshifting, brightening), giving a tunable dark-state emitter.
  • The three observed zero-field resonances are the symmetric partners of three moiré-confined levels, so the supermoiré platform inherits the discrete level structure of the underlying moiré potentials.
  • Doping-dependent photoluminescence can reveal supermoiré lattices: the filling feature at ±0.1 V gives a density matching the geometrically predicted supermoiré density.
  • At high electric field, when the quadrupolar energy advantage is lost, emission spreads from the supermoiré pockets to the full moiré landscape, a directly observable crossover of the emission area.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rigid supermoiré picture holds, the same trapping mechanism should work in other symmetric trilayers and could be deliberately engineered by choosing twist angles to control the pocket spacing and the resulting quadrupole–quadrupole interaction strength.
  • The paper never tests atomic reconstruction; a direct structural probe of the local stacking would show whether the ideal periodic pockets survive in the small-twist, reconstruction-prone regime—if they do not, the robustness claim needs revision even if the Stark physics stands.
  • The funnelling to supermoiré pockets at low field implies local exciton densities higher than the average; at stronger pumping or with denser pockets, this could access interaction-driven phases of quadrupolar excitons that the current low-density experiment deliberately avoids.
  • The agreement between gating-derived and twist-derived supermoiré densities suggests a quick optical diagnostic for supermoiré periods in any trilayer, useful for screening samples before device fabrication.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports photoluminescence experiments on a dual-gated WS2/WSe2/WS2 heterotrilayer and interprets them in terms of supermoiré-trapped quadrupolar excitons (QX). The central claim is that the interference of the top and bottom moiré patterns creates periodic pockets of vertically aligned atomic registries, that these pockets trap QXs, and that the resulting QX formation is robust against unintentional twist-angle mismatch. Evidence presented includes: (i) a nonlinear hyperbolic Stark shift with hybridization energy δ ≈ 11.5 meV, (ii) a field-brightening anti-symmetric branch, (iii) three zero-field bright symmetric moiré levels, (iv) an independent density match between gate-induced supermoiré filling (4.98×10^11 cm^-2) and twist-angle-derived density (~5×10^11 cm^-2), and (v) a 6×6 two-moiré Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) that qualitatively reproduces the field dispersion. The paper also reports power-law exponents, polarization switching, and a field-dependent electron–hole overlap calculation to support the assignment of symmetric and anti-symmetric QX branches.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is significant: it extends the moiré-exciton platform to multipolar excitons in three-layer stacks, shows that a supermoiré lattice can provide aligned trapping sites despite imperfect angle alignment, and identifies a multi-level hybridization structure with bright and dark QX states. The paper has concrete strengths: the hyperbolic Stark shift and the appearance of a field-brightened anti-symmetric branch are direct, model-independent signatures of QX formation; the supermoiré density extracted from gating is cross-checked against an independent twist-angle estimate; and the field-dependent overlap calculation in S11 is a constructive step toward understanding brightness tunability. The main risk is not internal inconsistency but an untested structural premise: the rigid-lattice supermoiré geometry used to compute density and robustness may be altered by atomic reconstruction at the small WS2–WS2 twist of this sample.

major comments (3)
  1. [S5/S1, Fig. SF5] The supermoiré period and density are computed with rigid-lattice formulas (λSM1, λSM2) from edge-measured twist angles of 1.9° and 0.7°, giving a WS2–WS2 relative twist of ~1.2°. This is squarely in the regime where atomic reconstruction is known to relax small-angle TMD stacks into stacking domains, as documented in the very reference cited in S5 (Weston et al., ref 5). The paper does not test whether the aligned registry pockets used for QX trapping survive reconstruction. No STM, conductive-AFM, or other structural data are provided, and S1 argues robustness only with rigid-lattice geometric constructions. Because the paper's distinctive claim is supermoiré trapping and robustness to twist mismatch, this is load-bearing: if reconstruction modifies the pocket map, the density agreement becomes coincidental and the attribution of the QX to supermoiré pockets is not established. A concr
  2. [Eq. 2, Fig. 3b,c] The multi-level hybridization model is only qualitatively validated. The parameters entering Eq. 2 — t, t0, t1, t2, Δm1, Δm2, and e.d — are not tabulated for Fig. 3b, and the comparison to experiment is made with color-coded guides described as 'qualitatively well reproduced.' With at least six adjustable parameters and only three tracked peak positions in Fig. 3c, the visual agreement does not strongly constrain the model. Please provide the parameter set used, a residual or chi-square analysis, or an explicit falsifiable prediction (e.g., anti-crossing gap size) against the finer-field data. This is needed to substantiate the claim that interaction between multiple confined levels, rather than a simpler two-level picture, is actually observed.
  3. [S10 and main text near Fig. 3c] The inference t0 < t1 < t2 from the measured slope ordering is partly circular. S10 derives |∂E/∂F| ≈ ed(1 − (t/edF)^2/2) from the same two-level model used to define the slopes, so a smaller slope is mathematically equivalent to a larger t by construction. The observed ordering (ed_QX0 > ed_QX1 > ed_QX2) therefore does not independently confirm stronger coupling for higher moiré levels; it could also arise from different effective dipole moments or field-dependent couplings t_i(F). Please identify an independent observable — such as an avoided-crossing gap, an intensity ratio, or a direct tunneling calculation — that tests the t0 < t1 < t2 ordering, or explicitly acknowledge that S10 is a reparameterization rather than independent evidence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [S5] The supermoiré density is quoted as 4.7×10^11 cm^-2 from λSM1 and 5.1×10^11 cm^-2 from λSM2; the main text summarizes this as ≈5×10^11 cm^-2. The small inconsistency is acceptable, but please state clearly which value is used for the comparison and the uncertainty budget.
  2. [S3] Typo: 'loss in excitation pass' should be 'loss in excitation path.' Also, the exciton density estimate assumes 100% quantum efficiency; this is conservative but should be stated in the main text, not only in the SI.
  3. [Fig. 2d and S12] The high-field multi-peak structure is explained as arising from inhomogeneity and degeneracy lifting, but no quantitative model is given. This is acceptable as a qualitative explanation, but a sentence acknowledging the speculative nature would be useful.
  4. [S14] The DOCP switching argument is clear but the schematic in Fig. SF14b would benefit from a label indicating which WS2 layer is 'top' and which is 'bottom' for readers unfamiliar with the device geometry.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the supermoiré–QX claim rests on independent density cross-checks and field-tunable PL signatures; the only self-citations are supporting, and the slope–coupling check is a consistency argument, not a fit-renamed-as-prediction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: (1) The hyperbolic Stark shift (Eq. 1) is fit to the trilayer PL with δ≈11.5 meV and benchmarked against independent prior QX observations (refs 23–25); the symmetric/antisymmetric branch assignment is a consequence of the two-level model, not a circular input. (2) The supermoiré density is cross-checked by two independent routes: gate-voltage filling (4.98×10^11 cm^-2) and twist-angle geometry (≈5×10^11 cm^-2, SI S5); neither quantity is defined in terms of the other. (3) The 6×6 Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) uses level spacings extracted from the bilayer region and coupling magnitudes ~10–30 meV (ref 20); it reproduces the data qualitatively, but the central QX assignment does not reduce to these parameters. (4) The slope ordering in Fig. 3c (ed_QXS0 > ed_QXS1 > ed_QXS2) is described as 'in agreement with' the expectation t0<t1<t2; SI S10 justifies that ordering by a separate tunnel-barrier argument, not by fitting the slopes. This is a consistency check rather than a circular prediction. (5) Self-citations (refs 32, 4, 6) support ancillary assignments (three-peak moiré structure, moiré-period formula, inhomogeneity) and are not load-bearing for the central claim. The unverified rigid-supermoiré assumption and possible atomic reconstruction are correctness risks, not instances of circularity. No step reduces by definition to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities (particles/forces) are introduced; the 'supermoiré-trapped QX' names a composite state assembled from known ingredients. The central claim rests on two fitted observables (δ, e.d), two extracted level spacings (Δm1, Δm2), a loosely pinned coupling set (t, t0-t2), and five domain/ad-hoc assumptions. The heaviest unexamined burden is the rigid-lattice geometric premise, since reconstruction could alter the very pockets the claim depends on.

free parameters (5)
  • δ (hybridization energy) = 11.5 meV
    Fitted to the trilayer field-dependent peak energy using Eq. 1 (S6); verified against the anti-symmetric branch at high field.
  • e.d (interlayer dipole moment) = 0.5 e.nm
    Extracted from the bilayer linear Stark shift (Fig 2b), then reused as the field scale in Eq. 1 and Eq. 2 for the trilayer.
  • Δm1 (second moiré level spacing) = ~20 meV
    Taken from the bilayer inter-peak separation (Fig 2a) and inserted into Eq. 2 as the zero-field energy of the 2nd level.
  • Δm2 (third moiré level spacing) = ~40 meV
    Taken from the bilayer inter-peak separation (Fig 2a) and inserted into Eq. 2 as the zero-field energy of the 3rd level.
  • Coupling constants t, t0, t1, t2 = 10-30 meV range (ref 20), t0<t1<t2 assumed
    Inter-moiré coupling parameters in Eq. 2; pinned only by a quoted range from ref 20 with assumed ordering; no per-value fit or uncertainty given; generate Fig 3b.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ideal rigid-lattice moiré/supermoiré geometry formulas apply to the trilayer with the measured twist angles
    Invoked in S5 (λSM formula and a/θ) to derive the supermoiré density ~5×10^11 cm^-2 and in S1 for the robustness claim; ignores atomic reconstruction, likely at the 1.2° WS2-WS2 twist; no structural (STM) check provided.
  • domain assumption Type-II WS2/WSe2 alignment with degenerate conduction states in the top/bottom WS2, coherently tunnel-coupled through WSe2
    Underpins IX_u/IX_d formation and symmetric/anti-symmetric hybridization (Fig 2a inset; Eq. 1; refs 20, 23-25). Standard for this material pair.
  • ad hoc to paper The two moiré potentials are identical harmonic wells with the same level spacings Δm1, Δm2 and degenerate zero-field levels
    Input to Eq. 2: Δm1~20 meV, Δm2~40 meV taken from the bilayer region; degeneracy of top and bottom moiré states is assumed despite unequal twist angles (1.9° vs 0.7°) giving different moiré periods.
  • domain assumption 1D two-well Schrödinger electron-hole overlap captures the field-dependent brightness of the symmetric and anti-symmetric branches
    S11 model for Fig 4a, used to explain the brightening dark branch; neglects in-plane moiré confinement and excitonic Coulomb correlation.
  • ad hoc to paper The ±0.1 V doping features are supermoiré-lattice filling
    S5 attributes the near-zero-gate oscillatory features to supermoiré filling because the inferred density (4.98×10^11 cm^-2) matches the twist-derived value; alternative origins (trivial doping, defects) are not excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supermoir\'e-trapped quadrupolar exciton." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FUWSQ675

@misc{pith2026260722532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supermoir\'e-trapped quadrupolar exciton},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FUWSQ675}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22532}
}
abstract

Moir\'e-trapped dipolar interlayer exciton in heterobilayers offers a rich platform to explore interaction-driven phenomena. Extending the number of layers to three and beyond leads to highly intriguing multipolar exciton - a superposition state of vertically aligned phase-coherent excitons. However, in experiments, unintentional twist-angle mismatch among layers may degrade the strength and homogeneity of the vertical Coulomb coupling. Here we propose that the supermoir\'e effect in a heterotrilayer comes to the rescue by creating periodic pockets of vertically aligned atomic registries that facilitate the formation of quadrupolar excitons trapped in such pockets. Using WS$_2$/WSe$_2$/WS$_2$ stack, we show interaction between multiple confined levels of the top and bottom moir\'e interfaces, creating electric field tunable multi-level hybridized bright (symmetric) and dark (anti-symmetric) quadrupolar states. Our work underscores the critical role of supermoir\'e effect in quadrupolar excitons. The discovery of reduced sensitivity on precise angle-alignment will ignite exploration of complex excitonic states in multi-layered heterostructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22532 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Supermoir´e landscape in hetero-trilayer:(a) Illustration of the moir´e land￾scape in the heterostructure and different excitonic species existing at different local stack￾ings. The bilayer regions (WS2/WSe2) host interlayer excitons (IXs) at positions defined by the moir´e, as shown by the white dashed lines (regions C and D). The trilayer region (WS2/WSe2/WS2) shows the emergence of a supermoir´e and can host unco… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Emission features of dipolar and quadrupolar exciton:(a) Photolumines￾cence (PL) Spectra from WS2/WSe2/WS2 trilayer and WS2/WSe2 bilayer regions of the heterostructure with their corresponding decomposed peaks. The insets illustrate the simpli￾fied band structure of the corresponding regions. (b,c) Colour plot of electric field dependent PL for (b) WS2/WSe2 bilayer and (c) WS2/WSe2/WS2 trilayer. (d) Colour plot of t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Vertical moir´e-moir´e interaction: (a) Simplified potential well picture for the two vertically-coupled moir´e wells. (top) The situation at zero applied electric field. The corresponding ti={0,1,2} represents the coupling between the electronic states between the top and bottom WS2layers with the same level in the moir´e wells. (bottom) At nonzero electric field, t represents coupling between states QXi̸=j . (b) C… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quadrupolar exciton at high electric field: (a) External electric field de￾pendence of calculated overlap between the electron and hole wavefunctions in symmetric and anti-symmetric QXs. The inset shows the change in ratio of electron-hole wavefunc￾tion overlap for sym…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references

  1. [1]

    A.; Kyriienko, O

    Shahnazaryan, V.; Iorsh, I.; Shelykh, I. A.; Kyriienko, O. Exciton-Exciton Interaction in Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayers. Physical Review B 2017, 96, 115409

    2017

  2. [2]

    Exciton-Exciton Interaction in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayers and van Der Waals Heterostructures

    Erkensten, D.; Brem, S.; Malic, E. Exciton-Exciton Interaction in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayers and van Der Waals Heterostructures. Physical Review B 2021, 103, 045426

    2021

  3. [3]

    Tuning Moir \'e Excitons and Correlated Electronic States through Layer Degree of Freedom

    Chen, D.; Lian, Z.; Huang, X.; Su, Y.; Rashetnia, M.; Yan, L.; Blei, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Tongay, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Cui, Y.-T.; Shi, S.-F. Tuning Moir \'e Excitons and Correlated Electronic States through Layer Degree of Freedom. Nature Communications 2022, 13, 4810

    2022

  4. [4]

    M.; Hill, H

    Chernikov, A.; Van Der Zande, A. M.; Hill, H. M.; Rigosi, A. F.; Velauthapillai, A.; Hone, J.; Heinz, T. F. Electrical Tuning of Exciton Binding Energies in Monolayer WS _2 . Physical Review Letters 2015, 115, 126802

    2015

  5. [5]

    Li, T.; Jiang, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, K.; Zhu, J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Chowdhury, D.; Fu, L.; Shan, J.; Mak, K. F. Continuous Mott Transition in Semiconductor Moir \'e Superlattices. Nature 2021, 597, 350--354

    2021

  6. [6]

    F.; Shan, J

    Mak, K. F.; Shan, J. Semiconductor Moir \'e Materials. Nature Nanotechnology 2022, 17, 686--695

    2022

  7. [7]

    Julku, A.; Ding, S.; Bruun, G. M. Exciton Interacting with a Moir \'e Lattice: Polarons , Strings, and Optical Probing of Spin Correlations. Physical Review Research 2024, 6, 033119

    2024

  8. [8]

    Tran, K. et al. Evidence for Moir \'e Excitons in van Der Waals Heterostructures. Nature 2019, 567, 71--75

    2019

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Revealing the Biexciton and Trion-Exciton Complexes in BN Encapsulated WSe _2

    Li, Z.; Wang, T.; Lu, Z.; Jin, C.; Chen, Y.; Meng, Y.; Lian, Z.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Zhang, S.; Smirnov, D.; Shi, S.-F. Revealing the Biexciton and Trion-Exciton Complexes in BN Encapsulated WSe _2 . Nature Communications 2018, 9, 3719

    2018

  2. [10]

    Y.; Da Jornada, F

    Qiu, D. Y.; Da Jornada, F. H.; Louie, S. G. Optical Spectrum of MoS 2 : Many-Body Effects and Diversity of Exciton States . Physical Review Letters 2013, 111, 216805

    2013

  3. [11]

    Nonlinear Photoluminescence in Atomically Thin Layered WSe _2 Arising from Diffusion-Assisted Exciton-Exciton Annihilation

    Mouri, S.; Miyauchi, Y.; Toh, M.; Zhao, W.; Eda, G.; Matsuda, K. Nonlinear Photoluminescence in Atomically Thin Layered WSe _2 Arising from Diffusion-Assisted Exciton-Exciton Annihilation. Physical Review B 2014, 90, 155449

    2014

  4. [12]

    S.; Tsen, A

    Alden, J. S.; Tsen, A. W.; Huang, P. Y.; Hovden, R.; Brown, L.; Park, J.; Muller, D. A.; McEuen, P. L. Strain Solitons and Topological Defects in Bilayer Graphene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110, 11256--11260

    2013

  5. [13]

    Moir \'e Patterns in 2D Materials : A Review

    He, F.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, Z.; Cho, S.-H.; Jeong, J.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y. Moir \'e Patterns in 2D Materials : A Review . ACS Nano 2021, 15, 5944--5958

    2021

  6. [14]

    Magic in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Bilayers

    Devakul, T.; Cr \'e pel, V.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, L. Magic in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Bilayers. Nature Communications 2021, 12, 6730

    2021

  7. [15]

    Zhang, Y.; Yuan, N. F. Q.; Fu, L. Moir \'e Quantum Chemistry: Charge Transfer in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Superlattices. Physical Review B 2020, 102, 201115

    2020

  8. [16]

    Wu, F.; Lovorn, T.; Tutuc, E.; MacDonald, A. H. Hubbard Model Physics in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Moir \'e Bands . Physical Review Letters 2018, 121, 026402

    2018

  9. [17]

    Charge Transfer Excitations, Pair Density Waves, and Superconductivity in Moir \'e Materials

    Slagle, K.; Fu, L. Charge Transfer Excitations, Pair Density Waves, and Superconductivity in Moir \'e Materials. Physical Review B 2020, 102, 235423

    2020

  10. [18]

    H.; Shan, J.; Mak, K

    Tang, Y.; Li, L.; Li, T.; Xu, Y.; Liu, S.; Barmak, K.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; MacDonald, A. H.; Shan, J.; Mak, K. F. Simulation of Hubbard Model Physics in WSe _2 / WS _2 Moir \'e Superlattices. Nature 2020, 579, 353--358

    2020

  11. [19]

    Band Topology, Hubbard Model, Heisenberg Model, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Twisted Bilayer WSe _2

    Pan, H.; Wu, F.; Das Sarma, S. Band Topology, Hubbard Model, Heisenberg Model, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Twisted Bilayer WSe _2 . Physical Review Research 2020, 2, 033087

    2020

  12. [20]

    Quantum Phase Transitions of Trilayer Excitons in Atomically Thin Heterostructures

    Slobodkin, Y.; Mazuz-Harpaz , Y.; Refaely-Abramson , S.; Gazit, S.; Steinberg, H.; Rapaport, R. Quantum Phase Transitions of Trilayer Excitons in Atomically Thin Heterostructures . Physical Review Letters 2020, 125, 255301

    2020

  13. [21]

    E.; Kurbakov, I

    Astrakharchik, G. E.; Kurbakov, I. L.; Sychev, D. V.; Fedorov, A. K.; Lozovik, Yu . E. Quantum Phase Transition of a Two-Dimensional Quadrupolar System. Physical Review B 2021, 103, L140101

    2021

  14. [22]

    Deilmann, T.; Thygesen, K. S. Quadrupolar and Dipolar Excitons in Symmetric Trilayer Heterostructures: Insights from First Principles Theory. 2D Materials 2024, 11, 035032

    2024

  15. [23]

    M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Hone, J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Rubio, A.; Srivastava, A

    Li, W.; Hadjri, Z.; Devenica, L. M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Hone, J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Rubio, A.; Srivastava, A. Quadrupolar--Dipolar Excitonic Transition in a Tunnel-Coupled van Der Waals Heterotrilayer. Nature Materials 2023, 22, 1478--1484

    2023

  16. [24]

    Yu, L.; Pistunova, K.; Hu, J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Heinz, T. F. Observation of Quadrupolar and Dipolar Excitons in a Semiconductor Heterotrilayer. Nature Materials 2023, 22, 1485--1491

    2023

  17. [25]

    Bright and Dark Quadrupolar Excitons in the WSe _2 / MoSe _2 / WSe _2 Heterotrilayer

    Xie, Y.; Gao, Y.; Chen, F.; Wang, Y.; Mao, J.; Liu, Q.; Chu, S.; Yang, H.; Ye, Y.; Gong, Q.; Feng, J.; Gao, Y. Bright and Dark Quadrupolar Excitons in the WSe _2 / MoSe _2 / WSe _2 Heterotrilayer . Physical Review Letters 2023, 131, 186901

    2023

  18. [26]

    R.; Hone, J.; Zhu, X

    Bai, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Guo, Y.; Pack, J.; Wang, J.; Dean, C. R.; Hone, J.; Zhu, X. Evidence for Exciton Crystals in a 2D Semiconductor Heterotrilayer . Nano Letters 2023, 23, 11621--11629

    2023

  19. [27]

    Lian, Z. et al. Quadrupolar Excitons and Hybridized Interlayer Mott Insulator in a Trilayer Moir \'e Superlattice. Nature Communications 2023, 14, 4604

    2023

  20. [28]

    Localization-Enhanced Moir \'e Exciton in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterotrilayer Superlattices

    Zheng, H.; Wu, B.; Li, S.; Ding, J.; He, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, C.-T.; Wang, J.-T.; Pan, A.; Liu, Y. Localization-Enhanced Moir \'e Exciton in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterotrilayer Superlattices. Light: Science & Applications 2023, 12, 117

    2023

  21. [29]

    Wang, Z. et al. Composite Super-Moir \'e Lattices in Double-Aligned Graphene Heterostructures. Science Advances 2019, 5, eaay8897

    2019

  22. [30]

    Montblanch, A. R.-P. et al. Confinement of Long-Lived Interlayer Excitons in WS _2 / WSe _2 Heterostructures. Communications Physics 2021, 4, 1--8

    2021

  23. [31]

    Jauregui, L. A. et al. Electrical Control of Interlayer Exciton Dynamics in Atomically Thin Heterostructures. Science 2019, 366, 870--875

    2019

  24. [32]

    Harmonic to Anharmonic Tuning of Moir \'e Potential Leading to Unconventional Stark Effect and Giant Dipolar Repulsion in WS _2 / WSe _2 Heterobilayer

    Chatterjee, S.; Dandu, M.; Dasika, P.; Biswas, R.; Das, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Raghunathan, V.; Majumdar, K. Harmonic to Anharmonic Tuning of Moir \'e Potential Leading to Unconventional Stark Effect and Giant Dipolar Repulsion in WS _2 / WSe _2 Heterobilayer. Nature...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.