Pith. sign in

REVIEW 40 references

MIMAC sets a first directional upper limit on spin-dependent WIMP-proton scattering of 6.65×10^{-36} cm² at 90% CL, with no excess toward Cygnus.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-30 20:02 UTC pith:L7JGE5RM

load-bearing objection First real MIMAC directional SD-proton limit; solid null with a known isotropy assumption that scales the number but does not invent the result.

arxiv 2607.23527 v1 pith:L7JGE5RM submitted 2026-07-26 astro-ph.CO

First Directional Dark Matter Limits from the MIMAC {μ}-TPC Detector

Ilias Ourahou , Daniel Santos , Olivier Guillaudin , Jean-Francois Muraz , Nadine Sauzet , Charling Tao This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords directional dark matterMIMACmicro-TPCspin-dependent WIMP-protonON/OFF analysisnuclear recoilsCygnus windionization quenching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first directional dark-matter search limits from the MIMAC micro-TPC at Modane. Two unshielded chambers filled with a low-pressure isobutane–CHF3 mixture reconstruct three-dimensional nuclear-recoil tracks. After topological rejection of electron backgrounds and projection of the surviving recoils onto the galactic sky, the authors compare the rate inside a 15° cone toward the expected Cygnus wind against thirty equal solid-angle OFF regions drawn from the same data. A mass-dependent kinematic energy cut further suppresses impossible high-energy events. No excess appears in the ON region, yielding a 90% confidence upper limit on the spin-dependent WIMP-proton cross section of 6.65×10^{-36} cm². The result shows that a few tens of milligrams of hydrogen, read out directionally, can already set competitive bounds without massive passive shielding.

Core claim

With combined exposures of 495.1 and 354.2 days in two MIMAC chambers, no statistically significant excess of nuclear recoils is found in the Anti-Cygnus ON cone relative to data-driven OFF regions. The resulting 90% CL Profile-Likelihood upper limit is σ_SD-p < 6.65×10^{-36} cm².

What carries the argument

Data-driven ON/OFF spatial analysis on the galactic map: reconstructed 3D track axes are transformed to galactic coordinates, a 15° ON cone is centered on the expected Cygnus recoil direction, thirty equal-area OFF cones supply the background estimate (α=1/30), and a moving kinematic energy cut E_max(m_χ) is applied before the joint Poisson likelihood.

Load-bearing premise

The nuclear-recoil background is assumed to be spatially isotropic on the galactic sky, so that the average of thirty random OFF cones correctly predicts the background inside the ON cone.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of nuclear recoils inside the 15° Anti-Cygnus ON cone that cannot be absorbed by any of the 300 bootstrapped OFF-zone placements would invalidate the null result and the quoted cross-section limit.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Directional 3D tracking plus in-situ ON/OFF analysis can set competitive SD-proton limits with only ~0.02 kg·day of hydrogen exposure and no passive shielding.
  • The same method automatically cancels time-dependent and environmental backgrounds that dominate conventional Monte-Carlo-based analyses.
  • A twelve-fold larger MIMAC module with a 100 eV threshold is projected to extend the same directional reach deeper into the low-mass WIMP parameter space.
  • Once statistics allow a positive detection, the same galactic-map dipole would constitute a smoking-gun signature against the neutrino floor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If residual geometric acceptance or rock-neutron anisotropy exists, the isotropic-background assumption will systematically bias the limit; a dedicated angular-acceptance map would be the natural next calibration.
  • The moving kinematic cut is most powerful at low WIMP mass; the same cut applied to a fluorine- or carbon-rich mixture could test whether the hydrogen-only approximation remains valid above a few tens of GeV.
  • Because the limit is already competitive with kilogram-scale non-directional experiments, a modest array of MIMAC-style modules could become a cost-effective path to directional discovery.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circular derivation; experimental limit from data-driven ON/OFF counting with independent calibrations. Only mild self-reference in BDT signal training on the same physics run.

specific steps
  1. other [BDT training paragraph (pp. 3–4); Fig. 3 caption]
    "Conversely, the nuclear recoil signal training sample is extracted directly from the measurement run itself... By applying highly restrictive manual topological pre-cuts—specifically bounding the 3D track length and transverse width, requiring a high pixel density, and limiting the number of peaks on the Flash derivative to select single, compact interactions... This strategy allows the BDT to learn the topology of the measured recoils"

    The BDT's 'signal' class is defined from the same physics-run events (after hand pre-cuts that already encode the desired NR morphology) that the classifier later selects for the ON/OFF analysis. This is mild self-reference in the selection efficiency, not a forced prediction of the Cygnus excess or cross-section; directionality and the spatial likelihood remain independent. Flagged only as minor coupling of acceptance to the analyzed sample.

full rationale

This is a standard experimental null-result limit paper, not a first-principles derivation. The headline σ_SD-p bound is extracted from a joint Poisson ON/OFF likelihood on galactic-sky cones after a mass-dependent kinematic cut; N_ON and N_OFF are measured counts, α=1/30 is a solid-angle ratio, and the Profile Likelihood Ratio plus 300-fold OFF bootstrap are ordinary statistics. None of these steps equals its inputs by construction. Load-bearing detector inputs (IQF from COMIMAC, head-tail/angular resolution from neutron beams, drift velocity) are prior experimental calibrations by overlapping authors, but they are externally falsifiable beam measurements, not uniqueness theorems or ansatz smuggling, and do not algebraically force the WIMP limit. The sole mild self-reference is that the nuclear-recoil BDT training class is taken from the physics run after hand topological pre-cuts; that couples classifier efficiency to the same dataset (and is assigned an 11.6% systematic), yet the BDT is direction-blind, so the Cygnus null excess and the spatial background estimate remain independent of that choice. Isotropy of the NR background on the galactic map is a physics assumption that can bias the limit, but it is not circular reasoning. Score 1 for the minor same-run BDT training self-reference only.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The limit rests on the Standard Halo Model dipole, measured/extrapolated proton IQF, data-driven but pre-cut BDT acceptance, isotropic-sky OFF background, and conventional local DM density and escape-speed inputs. No new particle or force is invented; free choices are analysis cuts, halo numbers, and the IQF fit coefficients carried from prior work.

free parameters (6)
  • ON-zone half-angle = 15 degrees
    Fixed at 15° to cover kinematic spread plus quoted ~15° angular resolution; choice directly sets signal acceptance and α.
  • Number of OFF-zones N = 30
    N=30 sets α=1/30 and the background averaging; discrete analysis choice.
  • BDT selection threshold and manual topological pre-cuts
    Optimized cut on DensityCenter, HoleDensity, RatioSLEnergy, PrimaryCloudDur, AsymFactor etc.; efficiency enters acceptance with 11.6% systematic but absolute working point is analysis-chosen.
  • IQF Lindhard-like coefficients A,B,C = A=1.0, B=1.43±0.11, C=0.38±0.04
    Q(E_nr)=A E_nr^C/(B+E_nr^C) with A=1.0, B=1.43±0.11, C=0.38±0.04 fitted in prior Beaufort et al. work and used to map E_max_nr → E_max_ee for the moving cut.
  • local DM density ρ0 = 0.44 GeV/cm³
    Adopted ρ0=0.44 GeV/cm³ from Gaia DR3-based determination; scales the cross-section limit linearly.
  • halo speed parameters v_c, v_esc = v_c≈220 km/s, v_esc≈544 km/s
    v_c≈220 km/s, v_esc≈544 km/s fix v_max≈764 km/s and thus E_max_nr(m_χ) for the moving energy cut.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Standard Halo Model: isothermal isotropic non-rotating DM halo producing a dipole WIMP wind from Cygnus and recoils toward Anti-Cygnus.
    Used to define the ON-zone center and to interpret a null excess as a cross-section limit (Spergel 1988 framework).
  • domain assumption Nuclear-recoil background is spatially isotropic on the galactic map after selection, validating α=1/N OFF scaling.
    Stated explicitly as the assumption behind the joint Poisson ON/OFF likelihood.
  • domain assumption In the ROI (ionization ≲10 keVee), observable recoils are entirely dominated by hydrogen; C and F contributions are kinematically/quenching-suppressed and neglected.
    Justifies reporting only σ_SD-p and the hydrogen target mass ~19.9 mg/chamber.
  • domain assumption COMIMAC-measured proton IQF plus Lindhard-style extrapolation correctly converts keVnr to keVee down to the analysis threshold.
    Sets the moving E_max_ee cut and the energy scale of the limit; paper notes ~30% SRIM discrepancy.
  • domain assumption Head-tail sense from deconvolved primary-electron Flash profile plus PCA axis yields usable 3D galactic directions (angular resolution ~15° from neutron calibrations).
    Load-bearing for projecting tracks onto the galactic map and defining ON vs OFF.
  • standard math Ideal-gas target mass at 30 mbar, 293 K for 50/50 i-C4H10/CHF3 and quoted active volume.
    Converts exposure days into kg·days of hydrogen for the cross-section normalization.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 15648 in / 4413 out tokens · 94966 ms · 2026-07-30T20:02:18.753246+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a directional dark matter search using the MIMAC (Micro-tpc Matrix of Chambers) detector at the Modane Underground Laboratory. Operating a low-pressure gas mixture of i-C4H10 and 50% CHF3 at 30 mbar, without any shielding, the detector allows the reconstruction of the 3D tracks of nuclear recoils produced in the 6-liter active volume. Directionality is a crucial tool to discriminate true WIMP signals from those of background producing identical recoils, such as neutrons. We analyze data from two independent chambers with effective exposures of 495.1 and 354.2 days, respectively. To estimate the background directly from the data, we apply a standard ON/OFF spatial analysis. By projecting the reconstructed tracks onto the galactic map and applying a moving kinematic energy cut depending on the WIMP mass, we compare the event rate in the signal direction with multiple OFF-source regions. Finding no significant excess of events in the direction of the Cygnus constellation, we set an upper limit on the spin-dependent WIMP-protoncross section.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23527 by Charling Tao, Daniel Santos, Ilias Ourahou, Jean-Francois Muraz, Nadine Sauzet, Olivier Guillaudin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Ionization energy calibration spectrum for the MI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (left) Schematic diagram of a bi-chamber modulus MIMAC detector, highlighting the 25 cm drift region and the X-ray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Topological and time profile discrimination in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Galactic map of nuclear recoils, corresponding to an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The 90% CL upper limit on the spin-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 29 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    and others (Planck), Planck 2018 results

    Aghanim, N. and others (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Mat- ter: Concepts and Status, J

    M. Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Mat- ter: Concepts and Status, J. Phys. G46, 103003 (2019), arXiv:1903.03026 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Marrodan Undagoitia and L

    T. Marrodan Undagoitia and L. Rauch, Dark matter direct-detection experiments, J. Phys. G43, 013001 (2016), arXiv:1509.08767 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Billard, L

    J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Impli- cation of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next gen- eration dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D89, 023524 (2014), arXiv:1307.5458 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Grothaus, M

    P. Grothaus, M. Fairbairn, and J. Monroe, Directional Dark Matter Detection Beyond the Neutrino Bound, Phys. Rev. D90, 055018 (2014), arXiv:1406.5047 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    D. N. Spergel, The Motion of the Earth and the Detection of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1353 (1988)

    1988

  7. [7]

    Santoset al., MIMAC: MIcro-tpc MAtrix of Chambers for dark matter directional detection, J

    D. Santoset al., MIMAC: MIcro-tpc MAtrix of Chambers for dark matter directional detection, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 469, 012002 (2013), arXiv:1311.0616 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [9]

    Li and Y.-q

    T.-p. Li and Y.-q. Ma, Analysis methods for gamma-ray astronomy, Astrophys. J.272, 317 (1983)

    1983

  9. [10]

    J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter exper- iments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996)

    1996

  10. [11]

    Giomataris, P

    Y. Giomataris, P. Rebourgeard, J. P. Robert, and G. Charpak, MICROMEGAS: a high-granularity position-sensitive gaseous detector for high particle-flux environments, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A376, 29 (1996)

    1996

  11. [12]

    Bourrion, G

    O. Bourrion, G. Bosson, C. Grignon, J. Bouly, J.-P. Richer, O. Guillaudin, F. Mayet, and D. Santos, Data acquisition electronics and reconstruction software for di- rectional detection of dark matter with MIMAC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A622, 207 (2010)

    2010

  12. [13]

    Billard, F

    J. Billard, F. Mayet, and D. Santos, Three-dimensional track reconstruction for directional Dark Matter detec- tion, JCAP04, 006, arXiv:1202.3372 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [14]

    Beaufort, O

    C. Beaufort, O. Guillaudin, J.-F. Muraz, N. Sauzet, D. Santos, and R. Babut, Directionality and head-tail recognition in the keV-range with the MIMAC detec- 7 tor by deconvolution of the ionic signal, Astropart. Phys. 144, 102769 (2023), arXiv:2112.12469 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [15]

    I. Ourahouet al., 3D-Deuteron Track Recoils Pro- duced by Neutron Capture in Hydrogen Measured by MIMAC-35 cm, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17880 (2026), arXiv:2602.17880 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [16]

    Mayetet al., A review of the discovery reach of direc- tional Dark Matter detection, Phys

    F. Mayetet al., A review of the discovery reach of direc- tional Dark Matter detection, Phys. Rept.627, 1 (2016), arXiv:1602.00707 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [17]

    Muraz, D

    J.-F. Muraz, D. Santos, O. Guillaudin, G. Bosson, J. Bouly, O. Bourrion, C. Fourel, and J. Lamblin, A table- top ion and electron beam facility for ionization quench- ing measurement and gas detector calibration, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associ- ated Equipment832, 214 (2016)

    2016

  17. [18]

    Lindhard, M

    J. Lindhard, M. Scharff, and H. E. Schiott, Range con- cepts and heavy ion ranges (Notes on Atomic Collisions, II), Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk.33, 1 (1963)

    1963

  18. [19]

    Tampon, D

    B. Tampon, D. Santos, O. Guillaudin, J.-F. Muraz, L. Le- breton, T. Vinchon, and P. Querre, Ionization Quenching Factor measurement of 1 keV to 25 keV protons in Isobu- tane gas mixture, EPJ Web Conf.153, 01014 (2017)

    2017

  19. [20]

    Beaufort, O

    C. Beaufort, O. Guillaudin, D. Santos, N. Sauzet, E. Mo- bio, R. Babut, and C. Tao, Directional detection of keV proton and carbon recoils with MIMAC, JINST19(05), P05052, arXiv:2312.12842 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [21]

    I. T. Jolliffe,Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Statistics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002)

    2002

  21. [22]

    Riffard, D

    Q. Riffard, D. Santos, O. Guillaudin, G. Bosson, O. Bour- rion, J. Bouvier, T. Descombes, J.-F. Muraz, L. Le- breton, D. Maire, P. Colas, I. Giomataris, J. Busto, D. Fouchez, J. Brunner, and C. Tao, MIMAC low energy electron-recoil discrimination measured with fast neu- trons, JINST11(08), P08011, arXiv:1602.01738 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [23]

    Bozorgnia, G

    N. Bozorgnia, G. B. Gelmini, and P. Gondolo, Daily modulation due to channeling in direct dark matter crystalline detectors, Phys. Rev. D84, 023516 (2011), arXiv:1101.2876 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [24]

    J.-C. Liu, Z. Zhu, and H. Zhang, Reconsidering the galactic coordinate system, Astron. Astrophys.526, A16 (2011), arXiv:1010.3773 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [25]

    Lavalle and S

    J. Lavalle and S. Magni, Making sense of the local Galac- tic escape speed estimates in direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D91, 023510 (2015), arXiv:1411.1325 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [26]

    S¨ oding, Local dark matter density from Gaia DR3 K- dwarfs using Gaussian processes, Mon

    L. S¨ oding, Local dark matter density from Gaia DR3 K- dwarfs using Gaussian processes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.298, 2987 (2025), arXiv:2506.02956 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [27]

    Billardet al., In situ measurement of the electron drift velocity for upcoming directional Dark Matter detectors, JINST9, P01013, arXiv:1305.2360 [astro-ph.IM]

    J. Billardet al., In situ measurement of the electron drift velocity for upcoming directional Dark Matter detectors, JINST9, P01013, arXiv:1305.2360 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [28]

    Henderson, J

    S. Henderson, J. Monroe, and P. Fisher, The Maximum Patch Method for Directional Dark Matter Detection, Phys. Rev. D78, 015020 (2008), arXiv:0802.0592 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [29]

    Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of un- known background, Phys

    S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of un- known background, Phys. Rev. D66, 032005 (2002), arXiv:physics/0203002 [physics.data-an]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [30]

    Billard, F

    J. Billard, F. Mayet, and D. Santos, Assessing the dis- covery potential of directional dark matter detectors: Spatial performance, Phys. Rev. D85, 035006 (2012), arXiv:1110.6079 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [31]

    Baloghet al.(NEWS-G Collaboration), Search for Light Dark Matter with NEWS-G at the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Using a Methane Target, Phys

    L. Baloghet al.(NEWS-G Collaboration), Search for Light Dark Matter with NEWS-G at the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Using a Methane Target, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 141002 (2025), arXiv:2407.12769 [hep- ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS Collaboration), Low-mass dark matter search with CDMSlite, Phys

    R. Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS Collaboration), Low-mass dark matter search with CDMSlite, Phys. Rev. D97, 022002 (2018), arXiv:1707.01632 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [33]

    A. H. Abdelhameedet al.(CRESST Collaboration), First results on sub-GeV spin-dependent dark matter interactions with 7Li, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 630 (2019), arXiv:1902.07587 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [34]

    Angloheret al.(CRESST Collaboration), Probing spin-dependent dark matter interactions with 6Li, Eur

    G. Angloheret al.(CRESST Collaboration), Probing spin-dependent dark matter interactions with 6Li, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 207 (2022), arXiv:2111.00293 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [35]

    Angloheret al.(CRESST Collaboration), Testing spin-dependent dark matter interactions with lithium aluminate targets in CRESST-III, Phys

    G. Angloheret al.(CRESST Collaboration), Testing spin-dependent dark matter interactions with lithium aluminate targets in CRESST-III, Phys. Rev. D106, 092008 (2022), arXiv:2207.07640 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [36]

    D. S. Akeribet al.(LUX Collaboration), Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1705.03380 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [37]

    Xiaet al.(PandaX Collaboration), PandaX-II con- straints on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon effective inter- actions, Phys

    J. Xiaet al.(PandaX Collaboration), PandaX-II con- straints on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon effective inter- actions, Phys. Lett. B792, 193 (2019), arXiv:1901.03757 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [38]

    Aprileet al.(XENON Collaboration), Search for light dark matter interactions enhanced by the Migdal effect or Bremsstrahlung in XENON1T, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON Collaboration), Search for light dark matter interactions enhanced by the Migdal effect or Bremsstrahlung in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 241803 (2019), arXiv:1907.12771 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [39]

    Behnkeet al.(PICASSO Collaboration), Final re- sults of the PICASSO dark matter search experiment, Astropart

    E. Behnkeet al.(PICASSO Collaboration), Final re- sults of the PICASSO dark matter search experiment, Astropart. Phys.90, 85 (2017), arXiv:1611.01499 [hep- ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [40]

    Amoleet al.(PICO Collaboration), Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO- 60 CF3I Bubble Chamber, Phys

    C. Amoleet al.(PICO Collaboration), Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO- 60 CF3I Bubble Chamber, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 251301 (2017), arXiv:1702.07664 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [41]

    Linet al.(PandaX Collaboration), Search for Light Dark Matter with 259-day data in PandaX-4T, Phys

    Q. Linet al.(PandaX Collaboration), Search for Light Dark Matter with 259-day data in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211001 (2025), arXiv:2507.11930 [hep- ex]

    arXiv 2025