Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Finding an Upper Limit in the Presence of Unknown Background

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/0203002 v2 pith:KVQAY2E6 submitted 2002-03-01 physics.data-an stat.AP

Finding an Upper Limit in the Presence of Unknown Background

classification physics.data-an stat.AP
keywords limitbackgroundparameterupperchangedifferenceeventsintervals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Experimenters report an upper limit if the signal they are trying to detect is non-existent or below their experiment's sensitivity. Such experiments may be contaminated with a background too poorly understood to subtract. If the background is distributed differently in some parameter from the expected signal, it is possible to take advantage of this difference to get a stronger limit than would be possible if the difference in distribution were ignored. We discuss the ``Maximum Gap'' method, which finds the best gap between events for setting an upper limit, and generalize to ``Optimum Interval'' methods, which use intervals with especially few events. These methods, which apply to the case of relatively small backgrounds, do not use binning, are relatively insensitive to cuts on the range of the parameter, are parameter independent (i.e., do not change when a one-one change of variables is made), and provide true, though possibly conservative, classical one-sided confidence intervals.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First Limits on Light Dark Matter Interactions in a Low Threshold Two Channel Athermal Phonon Detector from the TESSERACT Collaboration

    hep-ex 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A 0.233 g silicon athermal phonon detector with 361.5 MeV/c² rms resolution sets the strongest direct-detection limits on dark matter-nucleon cross sections for masses 44–87 MeV/c² after 12 hours of exposure.

  2. First Directional Dark Matter Limits from the MIMAC {\mu}-TPC Detector

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    With ~0.02 kg·days of hydrogen and a data-driven ON/OFF galactic-map analysis, MIMAC finds no Cygnus-directed excess and sets σ_SD-p < 6.65×10^{-36} cm² (90% CL).

  3. Solar axion searches with RES-NOVA: projected sensitivity and first prototype limit

    hep-ex 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    RES-NOVA's projected 1 ton-year sensitivity reaches within a factor of ~2 of XENONnT on the solar-axion electron coupling, and a 32.4 g-day archaeological-lead prototype excludes new parts of the (g_ae, g_aγ) plane.

  4. Probing large mass-splitting inelastic Dark Matter with RES-NOVA

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 32.4 g·d PbWO4 cryogenic detector reports the first direct limits on inelastic dark matter at mass splittings up to ~510 keV (SHM) and ~780 keV (LMC).