Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 53 references

Electrolytes confined between polarizable surfaces in slit pores with anisotropic permittivity tensor

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Strong dielectric anisotropy makes metallic and dielectric confining walls look the same by locking opposite ions into one plane.

desk verdict Clean anisotropic Green’s/Ewald method and a transparent self-image vs in-plane scaling argument, but the MC evidence is gathered at an impossible packing fraction so the headline dielectric≈metallic claim is not yet solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23812 v1 pith:F4REW7QK submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.soft physics.chem-ph

Alexandre P. dos Santos , Yan Levin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.chem-ph
keywords confinedelectrolytesdielectricanisotropyslitporesimagechargesMonteCarlosimulationGreen’sfunctionelectricdoublelayerpolarizablesurfaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper gives a practical way to simulate coarse-grained electrolytes inside a narrow slit whose dielectric response is anisotropic: parallel permittivity stays bulk-like while the perpendicular component is strongly suppressed. Using a coordinate stretch that maps the anisotropic Poisson equation onto an isotropic one, the authors show that a single ion’s image interaction with a wall depends only on the parallel permittivity, not on the suppressed perpendicular value. What does change dramatically is the direct Coulomb force between ions that sit at the same height: that in-plane interaction scales as 1 over the geometric mean of the two permittivities and therefore becomes much stronger when the perpendicular component drops. Monte Carlo runs for size-asymmetric 1:1 salts then show that these lateral correlations overwhelm image forces, forcing smaller cations into the contact plane of the larger anions. Under the strongest anisotropy the density profiles next to repulsive dielectric walls and attractive metallic walls become practically identical.

What carries the argument

A coordinate stretching transformation z̃ = √(ε∥/ε⊥) z that converts the anisotropic Poisson equation into an isotropic one with effective permittivity √(ε∥ ε⊥), combined with a 2D periodic Green’s function for the polarizable walls and a slab-corrected anisotropic 3D Ewald sum for the direct interactions.

What would settle it

Measure or simulate ion density profiles for the same size-asymmetric 1:1 electrolyte between dielectric versus metallic walls at sub-nanometer separation; if the cation contact-plane peak remains clearly different under strong anisotropy, the claimed dominance of in-plane correlations is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When the perpendicular permittivity inside a nanoconfined slit is reduced while the parallel permittivity stays bulk-like, amplified in-plane ion–ion correlations dominate the thermodynamics. They erase the structural distinction between dielectric and metallic boundaries by driving smaller cations into the same contact plane occupied by the larger anions.

Load-bearing premise

The liquid inside the slit is treated as a uniform continuum whose permittivity is a constant diagonal tensor with the parallel component fixed at the bulk water value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Isotropic bulk dielectric constants cannot describe double-layer structure in sub-nanometer pores.
  • Capacitance and local charge neutrality of nanofluidic channels will be set by lateral ion pairing rather than by wall image forces once ε⊥ is strongly suppressed.
  • Design rules for supercapacitors and electrochemical storage that assume metallic versus dielectric walls will converge under strong dielectric anisotropy.
  • Size asymmetry between cations and anions becomes the main control knob for which species occupies the contact plane.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real confined water also renormalizes ε∥ downward, the self-image cancellation derived here would break and wall-type differences could reappear.
  • The same stretching-plus-Green’s-function machinery should extend directly to mixed dielectric–metallic boundaries or to slits with position-dependent ε⊥.
  • In-plane correlation dominance suggests that 2D lattice-gas or strong-coupling theories may become quantitatively useful for anisotropic nano-slits even at moderate bulk concentrations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the authors' periodic-Green's-function + slab-corrected Ewald framework for confined electrolytes to slit pores in which the confined medium carries a uniaxial anisotropic permittivity tensor ε = diag(ε∥, ε∥, ε⊥). Via the coordinate stretch z̃ = √(ε∥/ε⊥)z the anisotropic Poisson problem maps onto the isotropic one with ε_eff = √(ε∥ε⊥), yielding (i) a self-image potential U_self = γq²/(4ε∥d) in which ε⊥ cancels from the spatial dependence (Eq. 16) and (ii) an in-plane pair potential q_iq_j/(√(ε∥ε⊥)ρ) that strengthens as ε⊥ is suppressed (Eq. 17). Canonical Metropolis MC simulations of a size-asymmetric 1:1 electrolyte (N+ = N− = 100, d+ = 0.3 nm, d− = 0.6 nm, L = 1 nm, Lxy = 4 nm) are then reported for dielectric (γ > 0) and metallic (γ = −1) walls at ε⊥ = 78.54, 20, 4. The central claim is that at ε⊥ = 4 the amplified in-plane correlations dominate completely, forcing cations into the anion contact plane and rendering dielectric and metallic density profiles practically identical.

Significance. The analytic core is sound and I verified it independently: the stretched-coordinate mapping (Eqs. 3–5, 12–14), the boundary-condition matching, the exact cancellation ε_eff·d̃ = ε∥d giving Eq. (16), and the in-plane law Eq. (17) are all algebraically correct and are stated without free parameters. The resulting method is a genuinely useful, efficient addition to the simulation toolkit for nano-confined electrolytes, and the two analytic results constitute clean, falsifiable scaling predictions (image forces insensitive to ε⊥ except through γ; lateral interactions scaling as 1/√(ε∥ε⊥)). If the MC evidence for the structural mechanism holds up under proper equilibration scrutiny, the dielectric≈metallic convergence at strong anisotropy would be a striking and practically relevant result for nanofluidics and supercapacitor modeling. The concern below does not touch the derivation; it touches the regime in which the simulations supporting the headline interpretation were performed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Figs. 2–5] §III and Figs. 2–5: the simulated state point is extremely dense, and this is load-bearing for the central attribution. With N+ = N− = 100, d+ = 0.3 nm, d− = 0.6 nm in a 4×4×1 nm box, the hard-core packing fraction is η = (π/6)(100·0.216 + 100·0.027)/16 ≈ 0.80, above random close packing (0.64) and above fcc (0.74). Because the anions are quasi-two-dimensional (their centers are confined to a 0.4 nm slab), the more relevant measure is the in-plane density at the two contact planes: 100 anion disks of area π(0.3 nm)² = 0.283 nm² over two 16 nm² planes gives a 2D packing fraction ≈ 0.88 per wall, well above the hard-disk freezing density (~0.70). The anion layers are therefore almost certainly crystalline, and single-particle Metropolis at this density is dynamically arrested: relaxation requires collective rearrangements that local moves cannot supply, and 10⁶ equilibration steps (≈5×10³–
  2. [§III–§IV] The manuscript reports no acceptance ratios, no error bars on any profile, no block-averaging, and no initialization-independence check (e.g., runs started from crystalline vs. disordered configurations). At η ≈ 0.80 the claim 'amplified in-plane correlations force cations into the anion contact plane' is confounded by 'there is nowhere else for the cations to go': the anion bilayer is pinned near steric capacity regardless of ε⊥. The isotropic baseline (ε⊥ = 78.54) partially controls for this, but the headline result — the practical identity of dielectric (γ > 0) and metallic (γ = −1) profiles at ε⊥ = 4 — could equally arise if both systems are trapped in the same sterically dictated configuration that the local MC dynamics cannot escape. The paper needs equilibration diagnostics (acceptance rates, energy/profile time series, at least two independent initializations, ideally swap or or
  3. [Abstract, §IV.B, §V] The abstract and §IV–§V repeatedly assert that lateral correlations 'dominate the thermodynamics completely,' yet no thermodynamic observable is reported — only density profiles. The framework already computes U_ES and U_p as separate terms (Eq. 11), so a direct quantitative test of the attribution is available at essentially no cost: report the mean polarization (image) energy and direct Coulomb energy per ion as functions of ε⊥ for both boundary conditions, and show that |⟨U_p⟩|/|⟨U_ES⟩| indeed becomes small at ε⊥ = 4. This would convert an interpretive claim into evidence and should be included; alternatively the thermodynamic language should be softened to structural language throughout.
minor comments (8)
  1. [§III] §III heading: 'MONTE CARLOS SIMULATIONS' → 'MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS'.
  2. [§IV.A] §IV.A: 'an size asymmetric 1:1 electrolyte mixture' → 'a size-asymmetric'. Similar grammar slips occur elsewhere; a careful proofread is warranted.
  3. [Throughout] The permittivity symbol alternates between ε and ǫ throughout (e.g., §II uses ε, §IV uses ǫ); please unify.
  4. [§II–§III] The Ewald parameters (κe, reciprocal-space cutoffs, real-space cutoff) and convergence checks for both U_ES and the m-sum in Eq. (5) are not reported; these are needed for reproducibility.
  5. [§IV] It would help the reader to state the effective Bjerrum length at each ε⊥: with ε∥ = 78.54, ℓB = e²/(√(ε∥ε⊥)kBT) grows from ≈0.71 nm (isotropic) to ≈3.2 nm at ε⊥ = 4 — comparable to Lxy = 4 nm. A brief finite-size sensitivity check (or at least a caveat) for the in-plane correlations is advisable.
  6. [Figs. 2–5] Figs. 2–5: the dielectric scenarios are said to be 'explained in legends' but the caption text does not state the (ε∥, ε⊥, εo) values or line/color conventions; captions should be self-contained. Uncertainty estimates should be added to the profiles.
  7. [§II, §V] The model assumes a uniform diagonal ε tensor across the slit with ε∥ pinned at the bulk water value while only ε⊥ is lowered. Given that molecular studies (several cited, e.g., Refs. 24–26) find spatially varying, nonlocal dielectric response in sub-nm pores, a short discussion of how the conclusions would change if ε∥ is also renormalized would strengthen the paper.
  8. [§IV.A] Given the near-frozen anion layers, a citation to the 2D hard-disk freezing literature and an explicit statement of the in-plane packing fraction at the contact planes would help readers assess the regime independent of the electrostatics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: analytic results follow from the anisotropic Poisson equation by coordinate stretch; MC profiles are not forced by construction or by load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper’s derivation chain is self-contained. Starting from the anisotropic Poisson equation (Eq. 1) with ε = diag(ε∥, ε∥, ε⊥), a change of variables z̃ = √(ε∥/ε⊥) z and ε_eff = √(ε∥ ε⊥) maps the problem onto an isotropic Green’s function (Eqs. 3–4). The self-image formula U_self(d) = γ q²/(4 ε∥ d) (Eq. 16) and the in-plane pair law U_ij|_(zi=zj) = q_i q_j / (√(ε∥ ε⊥) ρ_ij) (Eq. 17) are direct algebraic consequences of that map; neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, fitted to data, or assumed as input. The polarization energy Up and the slab-corrected anisotropic Ewald sum U_ES are obtained by substituting the same stretch into the authors’ prior isotropic formulas (Refs. 50, 54); those citations supply reusable numerical machinery, not the target physical claim. The headline result—that under strong anisotropy (ε⊥ → 4) dielectric (γ > 0) and metallic (γ = −1) density profiles become practically identical—is a Monte Carlo observation under stated hard-core and continuum-dielectric assumptions, not a quantity forced by normalization, uniqueness theorems, or self-citation. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness result is imported to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. Circularity score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on classical continuum electrostatics with a uniform uniaxial permittivity tensor, hard-sphere primitive-model ions, and polarizable planar boundary conditions handled by image/Green methods. No new particles or forces are postulated. Model parameters (ε∥, ε⊥, ion diameters, slit width, concentration) are chosen by hand to illustrate the mechanism, not fitted to experiment. The load-bearing physical idealization is spatial uniformity of the anisotropic tensor inside the pore.

free parameters (5)
  • ε⊥ values (4, 20, 78.54) = 4, 20, 78.54
    Hand-chosen anisotropy strengths to span bulk-like to strongly suppressed perpendicular response; not fitted to a measured profile.
  • ε∥ (parallel permittivity) = 78.54
    Fixed at bulk water-like 78.54 while ε⊥ is varied; choice controls the claimed self-image independence of ε⊥.
  • Ion hard-sphere diameters d+, d− = d+=0.3 nm, d−=0.6 nm (baseline)
    Size asymmetry (0.3 nm / 0.6 nm and variants) is chosen to make contact-plane locking visible; not fitted.
  • Slit width L and lateral box Lxy = L=1 nm, Lxy=4 nm
    L=1 nm, Lxy=4 nm set the confinement and periodic images; illustrative nanoscale choice.
  • Particle number N+=N−=100 = 100 + 100
    Sets average concentration inside the slit; not matched to a specific experimental density series.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Inside the slit the dielectric response is a uniform diagonal tensor ε=diag(ε∥,ε∥,ε⊥); outside it is a scalar εo.
    Sec. II Eq. (1) and Fig. 1; continuum idealization of measured nanoconfined anisotropy.
  • domain assumption Electrostatics obeys the anisotropic Poisson equation with fixed point charges and sharp planar dielectric boundaries.
    Eqs. (1)–(4); standard continuum electrostatics, no nonlocal kernel.
  • domain assumption Ions are charged hard spheres with no explicit solvent degrees of freedom (primitive model).
    Sec. III; steric diameters and ±e charges only.
  • standard math Coordinate stretch ˜z=√(ε∥/ε⊥)z maps the anisotropic problem onto an isotropic one with ε_eff=√(ε∥ε⊥).
    Sec. II after Eq. (3); standard transformation used to recycle isotropic Green/Ewald formulas.
  • standard math Canonical Metropolis Monte Carlo samples the equilibrium Boltzmann distribution of the model Hamiltonian.
    Sec. III; standard classical statistical mechanics.
  • domain assumption Metallic walls correspond to γ=−1 and dielectric walls to εo=4 (γ>0), with image energy formulas taken from the transformed isotropic theory.
    Eqs. (5)–(10) and Secs. IV.A–B; ideal boundary contrast.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electrolytes confined between polarizable surfaces in slit pores with anisotropic permittivity tensor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F4REW7QK

@misc{pith2026260723812,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electrolytes confined between polarizable surfaces in slit pores with anisotropic permittivity tensor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F4REW7QK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23812}
}
read the original abstract

We present a method that enables efficient simulations of coarse-grained electrolyte solutions inside a narrow slit pore with an anisotropic dielectric permittivity tensor. The electrostatic equations for polarizable surfaces are solved using a 2D periodic Green's function method combined with a slab-corrected anisotropic 3D Ewald summation. We apply this approach in Monte Carlo simulations to study 1:1 electrolytes confined between both polarizable dielectric and metallic surfaces. Our results show that dielectric anisotropy aggressively reshapes the double-layer structure. While a coordinate stretching transformation demonstrates that individual ion-image interactions depend strictly on the bulk-like parallel permittivity, the suppression of the perpendicular permittivity dramatically amplifies direct in-plane ion-ion correlations. Under strong anisotropy, these lateral correlations dominate the thermodynamics completely, rendering the structural profiles of mutually opposing dielectric and metallic boundaries practically identical by forcing the smaller cations directly into the contact plane of the larger anions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23812 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the system. The cations and anions ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Concentration profiles of cations for different diam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Concentration profiles of cations (orange) and an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Concentration profiles of cations (orange) and an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Concentration profiles of cations for different diame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zhu , author W

    author author J. Zhu , author W. Guo , author Q. Zhang , author S. Yang , author J. Hu , author J. Cao , author Y. Wei , \ and\ author C. Feng ,\ 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c05917 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 42 ,\ pages 8333 ( year 2026 ) ,\ note pMID: 41838655 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c05917 2026

  2. [2]

    author author M. H. \ Motevaselian \ and\ author N. R. \ Aluru ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03219 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 11 ,\ pages 10532 ( year 2020 a ) ,\ note pMID: 33290076 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03219 2020

  3. [3]

    author author M. H. \ Motevaselian \ and\ author N. R. \ Aluru ,\ 10.1021/acsnano.0c03173 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 14 ,\ pages 12761 ( year 2020 b ) ,\ note pMID: 32966055 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03173 2020

  4. [5]

    Colla , author I

    author author T. Colla , author I. M. \ Telles , author M. Arfan , author A. P. \ dos Santos , \ and\ author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1039/D3FD00062A journal journal Faraday Discuss. \ volume 246 ,\ pages 11 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/d3fd00062a 2023

  5. [6]

    author author I. M. \ Telles \ and\ author A. P. \ dos Santos ,\ 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03116 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 37 ,\ pages 2104 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note pMID: 33534585 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03116 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03116 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03116 2021

  6. [7]

    Colla , author M

    author author T. Colla , author M. Girotto , author A. P. \ dos Santos , \ and\ author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1063/1.4962198 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 145 ,\ pages 094704 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4962198 2016

  7. [8]

    Wang , author H

    author author S. Wang , author H. Tao , author J. Yang , author J. Cheng , author H. Liu , \ and\ author C. Lian ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01698 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 7147 ( year 2024 ) ,\ note pMID: 38959446 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01698 https://doi.org/10.1021/...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01698 2024

  8. [9]

    author author N. R. \ Aluru , author F. Aydin , author M. Z. \ Bazant , author D. Blankschtein , author A. H. \ Brozena , author J. P. \ de Souza , author M. Elimelech , author S. Faucher , author J. T. \ Fourkas , author V. B. \ Koman , author M. Kuehne , author H. J. \ Kulik , author H.-K. \ Li , author Y. Li , author Z. Li , author A. Majumdar , author...

    2023

Show all 53 references
  1. [10]

    Yang , author S

    author author J. Yang , author S. Kondrat , author C. Lian , author H. Liu , author A. Schlaich , \ and\ author C. Holm ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.118201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 118201 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  2. [11]

    author author J. Huang ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11093 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 122 ,\ pages 3428 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11093 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11093 NoStop

    2018 doi

  3. [12]

    Fan , author Z

    author author Y. Fan , author Z. Chang , author Z. Wu , author Y. Feng , author X. Du , author M. Che , author J. Tian , author W. Xie , \ and\ author K. Zhang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202314288 journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 34 ,\ pages 2314288 ...

    2024 doi

  4. [13]

    Lv , author C

    author author R. Lv , author C. Luo , author B. Liu , author K. Hu , author K. Wang , author L. Zheng , author Y. Guo , author J. Du , author L. Li , author F. Wu , \ and\ author R. Chen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202400508 journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 36 ,...

    2024 doi

  5. [14]

    Dietzel \ and\ author S

    author author M. Dietzel \ and\ author S. Hardt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.225901 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 225901 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  6. [15]

    \ Cazade , author R

    author author P.-A. \ Cazade , author R. Hartkamp , \ and\ author B. Coasne ,\ 10.1021/jp4098638 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 118 ,\ pages 5061 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4098638 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp409...

    2014 doi

  7. [16]

    Kalcher , author J

    author author I. Kalcher , author J. C. F. \ Schulz , \ and\ author J. Dzubiella ,\ 10.1063/1.3490666 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 133 ,\ pages 164511 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  8. [17]

    Jim \'e nez-Ángeles , author N

    author author F. Jim \'e nez-Ángeles , author N. Pogharian , author B. N. \ Onusaitis , \ and\ author M. Olvera de la Cruz ,\ 10.1021/jacs.5c04186 journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 147 ,\ pages 27105 ( year 2025 ) ,\ note pMID: 40699141 ,\ http:...

    2025 doi

  9. [18]

    Chen \ and\ author X

    author author X. Chen \ and\ author X. Kong ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01171 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 23 ,\ pages 5194 ( year 2023 ) ,\ note pMID: 37220138 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01171 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0...

    2023 doi

  10. [19]

    Loche , author C

    author author P. Loche , author C. Ayaz , author A. Schlaich , author D. J. \ Bonthuis , \ and\ author R. R. \ Netz ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02473 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 9 ,\ pages 6463 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://d...

    2018 doi

  11. [20]

    author author A. P. \ dos Santos , author F. Jim\'enez-\'Angeles , author A. Ehlen , \ and\ author M. Olvera de la Cruz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043174 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 043174 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  12. [21]

    author author I. M. \ Telles \ and\ author A. P. d. \ Santos ,\ 10.1088/1361-648X/ae2c30 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 38 ,\ pages 015901 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  13. [22]

    Renou , author A

    author author R. Renou , author A. Szymczyk , \ and\ author A. Ghoufi ,\ 10.1039/C5NR00508F journal journal Nanoscale \ volume 7 ,\ pages 6661 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  14. [23]

    Levin ,\ 10.1088/0034-4885/65/11/201 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 65 ,\ pages 1577 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    author author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1088/0034-4885/65/11/201 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 65 ,\ pages 1577 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  15. [24]

    Schlaich , author E

    author author A. Schlaich , author E. W. \ Knapp , \ and\ author R. R. \ Netz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.048001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 048001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  16. [25]

    Mondal \ and\ author B

    author author S. Mondal \ and\ author B. Bagchi ,\ 10.1063/5.0032879 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 154 ,\ pages 044501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  17. [26]

    Loche , author C

    author author P. Loche , author C. Ayaz , author A. Schlaich , author Y. Uematsu , \ and\ author R. R. \ Netz ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b09269 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 123 ,\ pages 10850 ( year 2019 ) ,\ note pMID: 31765168 NoStop

    2019 doi

  18. [27]

    author author M. R. \ Becker , author L. Lehmann , author E. Köhler-Ruiz , author A. P. \ dos Santos , \ and\ author R. R. \ Netz ,\ 10.2138/rmg.2026.91B.02 journal journal Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry \ volume 91B ,\ pages 35 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  19. [28]

    Fumagalli , author A

    author author L. Fumagalli , author A. Esfandiar , author R. Fabregas , author S. Hu , author P. Ares , author A. Janardanan , author Q. Yang , author B. Radha , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author G. Gomila , author K. S. \ Novoselov , \ and\ author A. K. \ Geim...

    2018 doi

  20. [29]

    Ballenegger \ and\ author J.-P

    author author V. Ballenegger \ and\ author J.-P. \ Hansen ,\ 10.1063/1.1845431 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 122 ,\ pages 114711 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  21. [30]

    Jalali , author H

    author author H. Jalali , author H. Ghorbanfekr , author I. Hamid , author M. Neek-Amal , author R. Rashidi , \ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.022803 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 102 ,\ pages 022803 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  22. [31]

    Stärk , author H

    author author P. Stärk , author H. Stooß , author P. Loche , author D. J. \ Bonthuis , author R. R. \ Netz , \ and\ author A. Schlaich ,\ 10.1063/5.0315836 journal journal Chemical Physics Reviews \ volume 7 ,\ pages 011319 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  23. [32]

    Zubeltzu , author F

    author author J. Zubeltzu , author F. Bresme , author M. Dawber , author M. Fernandez-Serra , \ and\ author E. Artacho ,\ 10.1103/qp52-s5d5 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 043101 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  24. [33]

    Mondal , author S

    author author S. Mondal , author S. Mukherjee , \ and\ author B. Bagchi ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00354 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 21 ,\ pages 5686 ( year 2025 ) ,\ note pMID: 40390293 NoStop

    2025 doi

  25. [34]

    Ahmadabadi , author A

    author author I. Ahmadabadi , author A. Esfandiar , author A. Hassanali , \ and\ author M. R. \ Ejtehadi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.024008 journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 024008 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    \ Olivieri , author J

    author author J.-F. \ Olivieri , author J. T. \ Hynes , \ and\ author D. Laage ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00447 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 4319 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note pMID: 33914550 NoStop

    2021 doi

  27. [36]

    De Luca , author S

    author author S. De Luca , author S. K. \ Kannam , author B. D. \ Todd , author F. Frascoli , author J. S. \ Hansen , \ and\ author P. J. \ Daivis ,\ 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00791 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 32 ,\ pages 4765 ( year 2016 ) ,\ note pMID: 27115841 NoStop

    2016 doi

  28. [37]

    Papadopoulou , author J

    author author E. Papadopoulou , author J. Zavadlav , author R. Podgornik , author M. Praprotnik , \ and\ author P. Koumoutsakos ,\ 10.1021/acsnano.1c08512 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 15 ,\ pages 20311 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note pMID: 34813279 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://d...

    2021 doi

  29. [38]

    Zhang , author F

    author author C. Zhang , author F. Gygi , \ and\ author G. Galli ,\ 10.1021/jz401108n journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 4 ,\ pages 2477 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/jz401108n https://doi.org/10.1021/jz401108n NoStop

    2013 doi

  30. [39]

    author author M. F. \ Calegari Andrade , author N. R. \ Aluru , \ and\ author T. A. \ Pham ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01242 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 6872 ( year 2024 ) ,\ note pMID: 38934582 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://do...

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    Hamid , author H

    author author I. Hamid , author H. Jalali , author F. M. \ Peeters , \ and\ author M. Neek-Amal ,\ 10.1063/5.0038359 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 154 ,\ pages 114503 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  32. [41]

    author author A. P. \ dos Santos \ and\ author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1063/1.4921221 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 142 ,\ pages 194104 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  33. [42]

    author author D. T. \ Limmer , author C. Merlet , author M. Salanne , author D. Chandler , author P. A. \ Madden , author R. van Roij , \ and\ author B. Rotenberg ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.106102 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 106102 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  34. [43]

    Desmarchelier , author A

    author author P. Desmarchelier , author A. P. \ dos Santos , author Y. Levin , \ and\ author B. Rotenberg ,\ 10.1063/5.0314749 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 164 ,\ pages 074106 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  35. [44]

    Merlet , author D

    author author C. Merlet , author D. T. \ Limmer , author M. Salanne , author R. van Roij , author P. A. \ Madden , author D. Chandler , \ and\ author B. Rotenberg ,\ 10.1021/jp503224w journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 118 ,\ pages 18291 ( year 2014 )...

    2014 doi

  36. [45]

    Jing , author V

    author author Y. Jing , author V. Jadhao , author J. W. \ Zwanikken , \ and\ author M. Olvera de la Cruz ,\ 10.1063/1.4935704 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 143 ,\ pages 194508 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  37. [46]

    author author I. M. \ Telles , author A. P. \ dos Santos , \ and\ author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1063/5.0233310 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 161 ,\ pages 214102 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    Boda , author D

    author author D. Boda , author D. Gillespie , author W. Nonner , author D. Henderson , \ and\ author B. Eisenberg ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046702 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 69 ,\ pages 046702 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  39. [48]

    Gan , author H

    author author Z. Gan , author H. Wu , author K. Barros , author Z. Xu , \ and\ author E. Luijten ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.019 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 291 ,\ pages 317 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  40. [49]

    Tyagi , author M

    author author S. Tyagi , author M. Süzen , author M. Sega , author M. Barbosa , author S. S. \ Kantorovich , \ and\ author C. Holm ,\ 10.1063/1.3376011 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 154112 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  41. [50]

    author author A. P. \ dos Santos , author M. Girotto , \ and\ author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1063/1.4997420 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 147 ,\ pages 184105 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    Arnold , author K

    author author A. Arnold , author K. Breitsprecher , author F. Fahrenberger , author S. Kesselheim , author O. Lenz , \ and\ author C. Holm ,\ 10.3390/e15114569 journal journal Entropy \ volume 15 ,\ pages 4569 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  43. [52]

    Tyagi , author A

    author author S. Tyagi , author A. Arnold , \ and\ author C. Holm ,\ 10.1063/1.3021064 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 129 ,\ pages 204102 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  44. [53]

    Tyagi , author A

    author author S. Tyagi , author A. Arnold , \ and\ author C. Holm ,\ 10.1063/1.2790428 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 154723 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  45. [54]

    author author A. P. \ dos Santos , author M. Girotto , \ and\ author Y. Levin ,\ 10.1063/1.4945560 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 144 ,\ pages 144103 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.