Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 86 references

Non-reciprocal couplings between multi-component fields are RG-irrelevant, so critical dynamics stays equilibrium Model A even when the ordered phase oscillates.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 19:57 UTC pith:CEZ6AU4Y

load-bearing objection Clean U(n) RG showing non-reciprocity flows to Model A for all n; the result is solid inside that symmetry, and the broader slogan needs the caveat the author already half-owns. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24252 v1 pith:CEZ6AU4Y submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.stat-mech

Non-Reciprocal yet Equilibrium Critical Dynamics

Emir Sezik This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords non-reciprocal interactionscritical dynamicsrenormalization groupModel Acomplex Ginzburg-LandauU(n) symmetryuniversality classesactive matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether asymmetric (non-reciprocal) couplings between two multi-component order parameters create a new critical universality class. The authors map the dynamics to a noisy multi-component complex Ginzburg–Landau equation protected by U(n) symmetry, then run a field-theoretic renormalization-group analysis to lowest order in ε = 4 − d. They find that the non-reciprocal couplings flow to zero: the stable fixed point is the ordinary equilibrium Model A fixed point for a 2n-component field. Critical exponents therefore match Model A, even though the ordered phase itself is a time-dependent oscillatory non-equilibrium state. The practical message is that non-reciprocity alone need not produce new critical classes when the symmetry is large enough to protect an effectively equilibrium flow.

Core claim

To lowest order in ε = 4 − d, the non-reciprocal couplings of two U(n)-symmetric n-vector fields are RG-irrelevant. The stable fixed point is the equilibrium Model A fixed point with 2n components (ũ*_R = 3ε / 2(n+4), w*_u,R = w*_D,R = 0), so the critical exponents coincide with Model A even though the transition is into a homogeneously oscillating non-equilibrium state.

What carries the argument

Field-theoretic renormalization group of the noisy multi-component complex Ginzburg–Landau equation obtained when two Model A fields share identical Hamiltonians H and H' (enforcing U(n)). The dimensionless ratios w_u = u'/u and w_D = D'/D measure non-reciprocity; their beta functions drive them to zero at the stable fixed point.

Load-bearing premise

The reciprocal and non-reciprocal sectors are forced to have the same functional form, which locks in U(n) symmetry and keeps the complex structure intact under renormalization; distinct couplings that break that symmetry are left unanalyzed.

What would settle it

A controlled simulation or higher-loop RG of two non-reciprocally coupled multi-component (XY or Heisenberg) fields that either finds a stable fixed point with nonzero non-reciprocal ratios, or measures critical exponents that clearly depart from 2n-component Model A.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Critical slowing down and response near the ordering transition of non-reciprocal XY or Heisenberg-like models should match equilibrium Model A with 2n components.
  • Non-reciprocity shows up only as a subleading drive exponent controlling resonant frequency, not as a change of universality class.
  • At criticality an effective O(2n) symmetry emerges and detailed balance is restored in the scaling sense (η = η').
  • Whether non-reciprocity produces new classes depends on the symmetry implementation, not on non-reciprocity by itself.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Breaking U(n) by giving reciprocal and non-reciprocal sectors independent couplings (as the outlook suggests) is the natural next stress test and could restore relevance of non-reciprocity.
  • The contrast with biquadratic O(n)×O(n) non-reciprocal models implies that linear non-reciprocity plus large continuous symmetry is specially protective of equilibrium criticality.
  • Experimental or numerical searches for non-equilibrium critical exponents in active or living systems may need to check symmetry content before attributing deviations to non-reciprocity alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the critical dynamics of two n-vector order parameters coupled non-reciprocally via a Levi-Civita structure (Eq. 1), with Hamiltonians H and H' of identical functional form (Eqs. 2a-2b), so that the model has U(n) symmetry and reduces to a noisy multi-component complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (Eqs. 4). Using an MSRJD field theory with minimal subtraction in d = 4 - epsilon, the author computes one-loop beta functions for the dimensionless quartic coupling and the non-reciprocal ratios w_u, w_D (with the w_D flow obtained at two loops, SM Eqs. 58), finds the stable fixed point to be the equilibrium Model A fixed point with w*_u = w*_D = 0 (Eq. 9), and obtains exponents (Eqs. 10) that coincide with Model A for a 2n-component order parameter, plus a subleading non-reciprocal exponent eta_c. An exact large-n analysis (SM Sec. III) recovers the equilibrium spherical-model exponents. The headline claim: non-reciprocity of this form is RG-irrelevant for all n, and the transition into the oscillatory non-equilibrium ordered state remains in the equilibrium Model A universality class. The internal calculation appears sound and I verified the epsilon-expansion coefficients in Eqs. (10a,b,d) against the standard O(N=2n) Model A results.

Significance. If it holds, this is a useful negative/clarifying result: it delineates which implementations of non-reciprocity do not yield new universality classes, complementing the O(n1)xO(n2) biquadratic models of Refs. 38-39 where non-reciprocity is relevant. Strengths: the calculation is fully explicit (propagators, causality conventions, Z-factors, beta functions given in the SM, with Mathematica-assisted integrals cited); the exponents agree analytically with Model A O(2n) values upon substitution N=2n; and an independent exact large-n solution recovers equilibrium spherical-model exponents with uncorrected nu' — a nontrivial consistency check. The identification of the effective theory with a noisy multi-component complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, and of the subleading drive exponent eta_c controlling the resonant response, is also valuable. The main limitation is one of scope rather than execution: the result lives in the fine-tuned U(n)-symmetric coupling subspace, and the paper's own outlook acknowledges this.

major comments (1)
  1. The irrelevance result is established only on the U(n)-invariant coupling subspace: the identical functional form of H and H' in Eqs. (2a-2b) forces the non-reciprocity into the imaginary parts of the same couplings, and the beta-functions (SM Eqs. 58) are computed only there. The RG eigenvalues of U(n)-breaking operators — distinct quartics u1 != u2, a biquadratic v(phi1^2)(phi2^2), or primed couplings differing in structure from unprimed ones, i.e. the generic O(n)xO(n) situation — are never computed. This matters concretely: for the reciprocal version of this anisotropy, the classic Aharony analysis of coupled phi^4 models shows the isotropic O(2n) fixed point is stable to interspecies anisotropy only when alpha_{2n} > 0, which fails for 2n >= 4 at small epsilon (marginally at 2n=4). Thus for the very cases advertised as physical motivation (n=2 XY, n=3 Heisenberg), the emergent O(2n)
minor comments (7)
  1. Ref. 64: 'See Supplemental Material at []' is a placeholder; the URL must be filled in before publication.
  2. SM Eq. (61)-(62) and main text: stability of the Model A fixed point is asserted via 'one can show that [the stability matrix] has no negative eigenvalues.' The three eigenvalues of Lambda (Eq. 59) at the fixed point should be displayed explicitly, at least in the SM — they also quantify the crossover rate at which non-reciprocity disappears, which is physically interesting.
  3. Eq. (9): it would reassure readers to state the normalization relating u* = 3epsilon/(2(n+4)) to the standard Model A O(N=2n) fixed-point value (6epsilon/(N+8)); the factor-of-two difference presumably traces to the complex-field vertex convention (u/3 vs u/4!) and should be made explicit.
  4. Eq. (10e): nu' retaining its mean-field value to all orders checked is notable. Since r' can be gauged away (SM, discussion after Eq. (19)), a sentence clarifying whether the uncorrected nu' is a consequence of that redundancy (rather than a coincidence) would strengthen the interpretation; likewise for the large-n result nu' = 1/2 (SM Eq. 92).
  5. SM Eq. (29): Z_{tau'} contains the ratio tau/tau', which is singular at criticality; the remark that this flow 'need not be captured' is terse and deserves one or two sentences of justification.
  6. Notation/typography: the citation alternates between 'Hohenberg and Halperin' and 'Halperin and Hohenberg' (abstract/intro vs. Ref. 44); the use of dotless-i for the imaginary unit is unusual and could be stated at first use; in the SM paragraph after Eq. (19), 'the critical behavior is then strictly controlled by r alone' reads awkwardly given that r' is retained.
  7. Fig. 1: the flow diagram is restricted to w_D = 0; since w_D has its own flow at O(u^2) (SM Eq. 58c), a brief note in the caption on why the w_D=0 slice is representative (or a second panel) would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: fixed points and exponents are outputs of explicit one- and two-loop β-functions, not inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The central claim—that non-reciprocal ratios w_u and w_D are RG-irrelevant and the stable fixed point is equilibrium Model A with 2n components—is obtained by constructing the MSRJD action from the Langevin equations, computing Z-factors from one- and two-loop diagrams (SM Eqs. 26–56), forming the β-functions (SM Eqs. 58), and solving β_ũ=β_wu=β_wD=0. The only infrared-stable root below d=4 is ũ*_R=3ε/(2(n+4)), w*_u,R=w*_D,R=0 (SM Eqs. 60–62); the Wilson functions at that point then yield the quoted exponents (SM Eqs. 76). Nothing in that chain is fitted to data, defined in terms of the target exponents, or forced by a self-citation uniqueness theorem. Recovery of Model A when w=0 is a consistency check, not a smuggled ansatz. Prior n=1 and Model A literature are used as external benchmarks. The modeling restriction to identical H and H' (U(n) subspace) is a scope/assumption issue, not circularity of the derivation within that model. steps is empty.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard dynamical field theory plus a specific symmetric non-reciprocal Langevin model. No parameters are fitted to experiment. The main domain choices are the identical H/H' structure (U(n)), Model A noise, the Levi-Civita non-reciprocal coupling, stability u'D'>0, and trust in the ε-expansion at the computed loop order.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Martin–Siggia–Rose–Janssen–De Dominicis mapping from Langevin equations to a renormalizable dynamical field theory with the stated response and correlation vertices.
    Used throughout the RG section and Supplement II.A; standard but not re-derived from microscopic Hamiltonian mechanics here.
  • domain assumption Upper critical dimension d_c=4 and controlled expansion in ε=4−d with minimal subtraction capture the universal critical dynamics of the model.
    Power counting in Supplement II; fixed points and exponents reported only to leading nontrivial order in ε.
  • ad hoc to paper Reciprocal and non-reciprocal sectors share the same functional form of H and H' (identical mass, diffusion, quartic structure up to primed couplings), enforcing U(n) and complex-conjugate pair structure under RG.
    Model Eqs. (1)–(4); this is the structural choice that distinguishes the work from O(n)×O(n) nonlinear non-reciprocity and is flagged for future breaking.
  • domain assumption Stability requires u'D'>0 so the ordered oscillatory phase has no finite-wavelength instability.
    Stated after Eqs. (2) and proven in mean-field linear stability (Supplement I); excludes a competing patterned regime.
  • domain assumption Gaussian white noise with equal strength on both fields; no conserved densities or additional reversible mode-coupling terms beyond the non-reciprocal drive written in H'.
    Langevin Eq. (1); places the model in the Model A family rather than B/H/etc.
  • standard math Standard one- and two-loop diagrammatics and Gamma-function regularization of momentum integrals are valid for extracting Z-factors and β-functions.
    Supplement II.C–E; conventional continuum RG technology.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 34385 in / 3523 out tokens · 84048 ms · 2026-07-31T19:57:02.100679+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Non-reciprocal interactions find broad applicability in non-equilibrium and living systems. Their canonical implementation involves asymmetric couplings between two entities, which generally induce spatio-temporal patterns and time-dependent steady states that break time-translational invariance, representing a clear deviation from equilibrium physics. Although their phenomenology is well understood, whether non-reciprocal interactions induce new universality classes, and if so, under what conditions, remains an open question. In the present work, we perform a field-theoretic renormalization group (RG) analysis of the dynamics of two non-reciprocally coupled $n$-vector order parameters possessing a $U(n)$ symmetry, generalizing previous results to order parameters with multiple components, a feature that has been shown to generate novel non-equilibrium critical behavior in certain non-reciprocal systems. To lowest order in $\epsilon = 4-d$, we find that the non-reciprocal coupling is RG-irrelevant, and the critical behavior is governed by the equilibrium fixed point of the Model A universality class of Hohenberg and Halperin with $2n$ vector components, even though the transition is into a non-equilibrium state. Our results demonstrate that non-reciprocity alone may not be sufficient to induce novel universality classes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24252 by Emir Sezik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciproc- ity as a generic route to traveling states, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 19767 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Brauns and M

    F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocal pattern formation of conserved fields, Phys. Rev. X14, 021014 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Dynamical phase transitions in the nonrecip- rocal ising model, Phys. Rev. E111, 034124 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Nonreciprocal ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 117103 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Garcia Lorenzana, A

    G. Garcia Lorenzana, A. Altieri, G. Biroli, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Nonreciprocal spin-glass transition and aging, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 187402 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    M. K. Johnsrud and R. Golestanian, State diagram of the non-reciprocal Cahn–Hilliard model and the effects of symmetry, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2025(12), 123204

    2025

  9. [9]

    S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Scalar Active Mixtures: The Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard Model, Phys. Rev. X10, 041009 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Y. Duan, J. Agudo-Canalejo, R. Golestanian, and B. Mahault, Phase coexistence in nonreciprocal quorum- sensing active matter, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013234 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Dinelli, J

    A. Dinelli, J. O’Byrne, A. Curatolo,et al., Non- reciprocity across scales in active mixtures, Nat. Com- mun.14, 7035 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Cocconi, H

    L. Cocconi, H. Alston, and T. Bertrand, Active bound states arising from transiently nonreciprocal pair inter- actions, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043032 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    M. J. Bowick, N. Fakhri, M. C. Marchetti, and S. Ra- maswamy, Symmetry, thermodynamics, and topology in active matter, Phys. Rev. X12, 010501 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Bandini, D

    G. Bandini, D. Venturelli, S. A. M. Loos, A. Jelic, and A. Gambassi, The XY model with vision cone: Non-reciprocal vs. reciprocal interactions, J. Stat. Mech. 2025, 053205 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    S. A. M. Loos, S. H. L. Klapp, and T. Martynec, Long- range order and directional defect propagation in the nonreciprocalXYmodel with vision cone interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 198301 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Rouzaire, D

    Y. Rouzaire, D. J. G. Pearce, I. Pagonabarraga, and D. Levis, Nonreciprocal interactions reshape topological defect annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 167101 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Dopierala, H

    D. Dopierala, H. Chat´ e, X.-q. Shi, and A. Solon, In- escapable anisotropy of nonreciprocal xy models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 088302 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Popli, A

    P. Popli, A. Maitra, and S. Ramaswamy, Ordering and defect cloaking in nonreciprocal lattice xy models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 088303 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Z.-Y. Liu, B. Zheng, L.-L. Nian, and L. Xiong, Dy- namic approach to the two-dimensional nonreciprocal X Y model with vision cone interactions, Phys. Rev. E111, 014131 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Risler, J

    T. Risler, J. Prost, and F. J¨ ulicher, Universal Critical Behavior of Noisy Coupled Oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 175702 (2004)

    2004

  21. [21]

    Risler, J

    T. Risler, J. Prost, and F. J¨ ulicher, Universal critical behavior of noisy coupled oscillators: A renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. E72, 016130 (2005)

    2005

  22. [22]

    Osat and R

    S. Osat and R. Golestanian, Non-reciprocal multifarious self-organization, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 79 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Nadolny, C

    T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal 6 synchronization of active quantum spins, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    K. L. Kreienkamp and S. H. L. Klapp, Synchronization and exceptional points in nonreciprocal active polar mix- tures, Commun. Phys.8, 307 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Daviet, C

    R. Daviet, C. P. Zelle, A. Asadollahi, and S. Diehl, Kardar-parisi-zhang scaling in time-crystalline matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 047101 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Hanai, Nonreciprocal Frustration: Time Crystalline Order-by-Disorder Phenomenon and a Spin-Glass-like State, Phys

    R. Hanai, Nonreciprocal Frustration: Time Crystalline Order-by-Disorder Phenomenon and a Spin-Glass-like State, Phys. Rev. X14, 011029 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Daviet, C

    R. Daviet, C. P. Zelle, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Nonequi- librium Criticality at the Onset of Time-Crystalline Or- der, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 167102 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequi- librium O(n) models, Phys. Rev. X14, 021052 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Reichenbach, M

    T. Reichenbach, M. Mobilia, and E. Frey, Mobility pro- motes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games, Nature448, 1046 (2007)

    2007

  30. [30]

    Vicsek and A

    T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, Collective motion, Phys. Rep. 517, 71 (2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    Bain and D

    N. Bain and D. Bartolo, Dynamic response and hydro- dynamics of polarized crowds, Science363, 46 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    S. Chen, D. E. G¨ okmen, M. Fruchart, M. Krumbein, P. Silberzan, V. Yashunsky, and V. Vitelli, Chirality across scales in tissue dynamics (2025), arXiv:2506.12276 [cond-mat.soft]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Theveneau, B

    E. Theveneau, B. Steventon, E. Scarpa, S. Garcia, X. Trepat, A. Streit, and R. Mayor, Chase-and-run be- tween adjacent cell populations promotes directional col- lective migration, Nat. Cell Biol.15, 763 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Paoluzzi, M

    M. Paoluzzi, M. Leoni, and M. C. Marchetti, Information and motility exchange in collectives of active particles, Soft Matter16, 6317 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Scheibner, A

    C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Sur´ owka, W. T. M. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity, Nat. Phys. 16, 475 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Fossati, C

    M. Fossati, C. Scheibner, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity and topological waves in active surfaces, Phys. Rev. E109, 024608 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 471 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, M. Foss-Feig, and M. F. Maghrebi, Nonequilibrium Fixed Points of Coupled Ising Models, Phys. Rev. X10, 011039 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, and M. Maghrebi, Nonequilibrium universality of the nonreciprocally cou- pledo(n 1)×o(n 2) model, Phys. Rev. E113, 034132 (2026)

    2026

  40. [40]

    Pisegna, S

    G. Pisegna, S. Saha, and R. Golestanian, Emergent po- lar order in nonpolar mixtures with nonreciprocal inter- actions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2407705121 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Sezik and G

    E. Sezik and G. Pruessner, Critical dynamics of non-reciprocally coupled conserved systems (2026), arXiv:2605.11892 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    G. G. Lorenzana, D. Martin, Y. Avni, D. S. Seara, M. Fruchart, G. Biroli, and V. Vitelli, When is non- reciprocity relevant? (2025), arXiv:2509.17972 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    U. C. T¨ auber and S. Diehl, Perturbative Field- Theoretical Renormalization Group Approach to Driven- Dissipative Bose-Einstein Criticality, Phys. Rev. X4, 021010 (2014)

    2014

  44. [44]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  45. [45]

    Akritidis, A

    M. Akritidis, A. Garc´ es, A. Vasilopoulos, M. Carosi, D. Levis, and N. G. Fytas, Fate of the ising uni- versality class under nonreciprocal interactions (2026), arXiv:2606.06981 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    K. E. Bassler and B. Schmittmann, Critical Dynamics of Nonconserved Ising-Like Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3343 (1994)

    1994

  47. [47]

    Chen and G

    L. Chen and G. Pruessner, Numerical investigation of the brownianq= 2 potts model, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033295 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Scandolo, J

    M. Scandolo, J. Pausch, M. E. Cates, and L. D. Carlo, Non-equilibrium coupling to a diffusing density breaks ising universality (2026), arXiv:2607.02661 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Guislain and E

    L. Guislain and E. Bertin, Collective oscillations in a three-dimensional spin model with non-reciprocal inter- actions, J. Stat. Mech.2024, 093210 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    L. M. Sieberer, S. D. Huber, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Nonequilibrium functional renormalization for driven- dissipative Bose-Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. B89, 134310 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    L. M. Sieberer, S. D. Huber, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Dynamical critical phenomena in driven-dissipative sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 195301 (2013)

    2013

  52. [52]

    Garc ´ ıa-Morales and K

    V. Garc ´ ıa-Morales and K. Krischer, The complex Ginzburg-Landau equation: an introduction, Contemp. Phys.53, 79 (2012)

    2012

  53. [53]

    Aranson and L

    I. Aranson and L. Kramer, The World of the Com- plex Ginzburg-Landau Equation, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 99 (2002)

    2002

  54. [54]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dy- namics of classical systems, Phys. Rev. A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  55. [55]

    Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynam- ics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynam- ics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z. Phys. B23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  56. [56]

    Bausch, H

    R. Bausch, H. K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, Renormal- ized field theory of critical dynamics, Z. Phys. B24, 113 (1976)

    1976

  57. [58]

    H. K. Janssen, On the renormalized field theory of non- linear critical relaxation, inFrom Phase Transitions to Chaos(World Scientific, Singapore, 1992) pp. 68–91

    1992

  58. [59]

    Notably, the correlation length exponentν ′ associated with the non-reciprocal parameterr ′ retains its mean-field value, in contrast toνwhich is corrected at orderϵ

    for a 2n−component real order parameter, consistent with the emergentO(2n) at the fixed point. Notably, the correlation length exponentν ′ associated with the non-reciprocal parameterr ′ retains its mean-field value, in contrast toνwhich is corrected at orderϵ. We also observe thatη−η c >0 for alln, so that at large length scales the equilibrium contribut...

  59. [60]

    U. C. T¨ auber,Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Ap- proach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Be- havior(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    2014

  60. [61]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    1996

  61. [62]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena; 4th ed., International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002)

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena; 4th ed., International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  62. [65]

    See Supplemental Material at [] for further analytical de- tails, which includes Refs

  63. [66]

    M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Pattern formation 7 outside of equilibrium, Rev. Mod. Phys.65, 851 (1993)

    1993

  64. [67]

    Kuramoto,Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence, Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol

    Y. Kuramoto,Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence, Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 19 (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1984)

    1984

  65. [68]

    De Dominicis, E

    C. De Dominicis, E. Br´ ezin, and J. Zinn-Justin, Field- theoretic techniques and critical dynamics. i. ginzburg- landau stochastic models without energy conservation, Phys. Rev. B12, 4945 (1975)

    1975

  66. [69]

    Specifically, in our caseϕ 1 →cos(θ)ϕ 1 −sin(θ)ϕ 2 and ϕ2 →cos(θ)ϕ 2 + sin(θ)ϕ1 for constantθis a valid trans- formation whereas it is not in the model considered in Refs. [39]

  67. [70]

    Watanabe and H

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama, Redundancies in Nambu-Goldstone Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 181601 (2013)

    2013

  68. [71]

    H. B. Nielsen and S. Chadha, On how to count Goldstone bosons, Nucl. Phys. B105, 445 (1976)

    1976

  69. [72]

    Non-Reciprocal yet Equilibrium Critical Dynamics

    M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory in the large N limit: A review, Phys. Rep.385, 69 (2003). Supplementary Material for “Non-Reciprocal yet Equilibrium Critical Dynamics" Emir Sezik 1,∗ 1Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom (Dated: July 28, 2026) CONTENTS I. Mean-Field Analysis...

    2003

  70. [73]

    Specifically, we first use a Feynman parameterization to rewrite the wave-vector integral,J , in Eq

    + (1−˚ıwD)(q1 +q 2)2 + 3τ /D+˚ıτ′/D .(36) Using several Feynman parameterizations, the wave-vector integrals can be evaluated. Specifically, we first use a Feynman parameterization to rewrite the wave-vector integral,J , in Eq. (36) as J = Z 1 0 dx (1 +x) 2 Z đdq1 1 q2 1 +τ /D Z đdq2 1 (q2 2 +τ /D) q2 2 + 21−˚ıxwD 1+x q1 ·q 2 +q 2 1 + τ D 1+2x+ ˚ıτ′/τ x 1...

  71. [74]

    + (1−˚ıwD)(q1 +q 2 +k) 2 + 3τ /D+˚ıτ′/D (51) Using similar Feynman parameterizations, the wave-vector integrals in Eq. (51) can be evaluated to give: I ab b(k, ω) =δab n+ 1 9 D(1 +w 2 u)˜u2Γ(3−d) Z 1 0 dx (1 +x) 2 (1 +x) 2 x(1 +˚ıwD)(2 +x(1−˚ıwD)) 2−d/2 × Z 1 0 dyy 1−d/2 1 −˚ıω D α2(x, y) +k2β2(x, y) +τ D m2(x, y) 3−d (52) where α2(x, y) = y(1 +x) 2 +x(1 ...

  72. [75]

    García-Morales and K

    V. García-Morales and K. Krischer, The complex Ginzburg-Landau equation: an introduction, Contemp. Phys.53, 79 (2012). 17

    2012

  73. [76]

    U. C. Täuber,Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behavior(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    2014

  74. [77]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena; 4th ed., International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002)

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena; 4th ed., International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  75. [78]

    M. L. Bellac and G. Barton,Quantum and statistical Field Theory(Oxford University Press, 1992)

    1992

  76. [79]

    D. J. Amit and V. Martin-Mayor,Field Theory, the Renormalization Group, and Critical Phenomena, 3rd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

    2005

  77. [80]

    Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z. Phys. B23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  78. [81]

    Bausch, H

    R. Bausch, H. K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, Renormalized field theory of critical dynamics, Z. Phys. B24, 113 (1976)

    1976

  79. [82]

    Janssen, Renormalized field theory of the critical dynamics of O(n)-symmetric systems, Z

    H.-K. Janssen, Renormalized field theory of the critical dynamics of O(n)-symmetric systems, Z. Phys. B26, 187 (1977)

    1977

  80. [83]

    H. K. Janssen, On the renormalized field theory of nonlinear critical relaxation, inFrom Phase Transitions to Chaos(World Scientific, Singapore, 1992) pp. 68–91

    1992

Showing first 80 references.