Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 62 references

Syntriod recovers Keplerian orbital periods from as few as five radial-velocity points by matching data to a library of phase-domain templates, staying accurate where classical periodograms fail.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:40 UTC pith:EYEBZWTT

load-bearing objection Solid pre-solver package with real sparse-regime gains over LS; the 94%/83% headline rates are optimistic (two-guess, mostly noise-free) but the method and open code still hold up. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24926 v1 pith:EYEBZWTT submitted 2026-07-27 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IM

Syntriod: A Robust Initial Parameter Estimator for Radial Velocity Curve Solutions Beyond Conventional Sampling Limits

Emre Barbaros , Hasan Ak , N. Filiz Ak This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IM
keywords spectroscopic binary starsradial velocityorbit determinationtime series analysistemplate matchingperiod searchsparse sampling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Spectroscopic binaries need good starting orbital parameters before expensive Bayesian orbit fits will converge, but many modern surveys deliver only a handful of irregular radial-velocity measurements. Classical tools such as Lomb–Scargle assume a sine wave and collapse into aliases when orbits are eccentric or sparsely sampled. This paper introduces Syntriod, a method that folds the data into orbital phase and scores them against a fixed library of precomputed Keplerian velocity curves. On 10,000 synthetic orbits it recovers periods to roughly one part in a thousand when eight or more points are available, still succeeds about 94 percent of the time at the formal six-parameter limit, and about 83 percent of the time with only five points. On twelve real binaries spanning periods from hours to a decade it reproduces literature solutions even after random thinning. When fewer than five points remain it drops the full orbit and still extracts mass ratio and systemic velocity from the linear relation between the two stellar velocities. The practical claim is that a fast, deterministic pre-solver can hand modern pipelines a physically consistent starting guess across both rich and sparse regimes.

Core claim

Matching sparse radial-velocity observations to a library of normalized Keplerian templates in orbital-phase space yields reliable initial orbital parameters, including periods accurate to order 10^{-3} for N_obs ≥ 8, success rates near 94 percent at N_obs = 6 and near 83 percent at N_obs = 5, while classical Lomb–Scargle periodograms become alias-dominated; below N_obs = 5 the same framework recovers mass ratio and systemic velocity from linear SB2 relations at high success rates.

What carries the argument

Syntriod: an adaptive orbital-phase-domain template matcher that scores observations against a precomputed library of Keplerian RV morphologies (e, ω grids), refined by an effective likelihood with phase-coverage, eccentricity, and trend penalties, plus an auxiliary harmonic periodogram (PSin) and dual-candidate reporting when N_obs < 7.

Load-bearing premise

The headline sparse-data success rates treat a recovery as correct if either of two returned candidate periods is close enough, and the main synthetic tests use noise-free velocities, so the quoted percentages partly rest on a two-guess allowance and idealized data.

What would settle it

Re-run the 10,000-orbit recovery campaign with realistic measurement noise and count only the single top-ranked period: if success at N_obs = 6 falls near or below Lomb–Scargle levels, or if randomly thinned real binaries no longer match literature periods, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Orbit-fitting pipelines can seed MCMC or nested sampling from Syntriod guesses instead of fixing or narrowly restricting the period.
  • Large spectroscopic surveys with few epochs per star can still extract usable initial periods and, for SB2s, mass ratios and systemic velocities.
  • Eccentric and long-baseline systems that defeat sine-based periodograms become tractable for automated first-pass characterization.
  • When photometry already supplies the period, two to four RV epochs can still yield dynamical mass-ratio and γ constraints.
  • Runtime of seconds per system makes the method practical as a survey-scale pre-solver.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-domain library idea could be extended to multi-planet or hierarchical triple RV signals if the template set is enlarged to superposed Keplerians.
  • Coupling Syntriod’s point estimates directly to a lightweight importance sampler might give approximate uncertainties without a full MCMC chain.
  • Survey pipelines that already store sparse Gaia or LAMOST RVs could batch-run Syntriod to flag high-priority SB2 follow-up targets by recovered q.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Syntriod, a phase-domain Keplerian template-matching algorithm intended to supply initial orbital parameters (P, e, ω, T0, K, γ, and for SB2s q) for RV orbit fitters, with an auxiliary harmonic periodogram (PSin) and a linear SB2 fallback for N_obs ≤ 4. The authors validate on 10,000 synthetic Keplerian orbits across N_obs = 10, 8, 6, 5, reporting period-recovery success rates of ~99.9% (N=10), ~94% (N=6), and ~83% (N=5) against a 10% relative tolerance, versus ~94%/62%/42% for Lomb–Scargle, and demonstrate recovery of literature solutions for 12 real systems under random subsampling. For N_obs ≤ 4 they estimate q and γ via the Wilson (1941) linear relation, reporting >99% success in the ideal case.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this is a useful, practical contribution: a fast, deterministic pre-solver for the sparse-RV regime that large surveys (Gaia, SDSS, LAMOST, DESI) routinely produce, where LS aliasing is a real failure mode. The paper ships several genuine strengths: an open-source implementation with configuration files and synthetic datasets on GitHub; a 10,000-orbit injection–recovery campaign with recovery scored against externally known injected parameters; a direct like-for-like LS comparison; twelve real benchmark systems spanning 0.42–3748 d; template-resolution sensitivity checks (Appendix A); and noise-injection tests (Appendix B). The template library, penalty weights, and tolerances are fixed a priori rather than fitted to the success metric, so the evaluation is not circular in construction. The concern is not the architecture but the calibration of the headline numbers, several of which are produced under best-case scoring rules and idealized data.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 4, footnote 4] The headline sparse-regime rates (~94% at N=6, ~83% at N=5, quoted in the abstract and §7) count a recovery as successful if EITHER of two returned candidates (main template search or auxiliary PSin) is within 10% (footnote 4, §3.2). The paper itself states the PSin second guess adds 5–10 percentage points, implying single-solution rates closer to ~85–90% (N=6) and ~73–78% (N=5). Since the method's stated purpose is to provide initial guesses to a downstream optimizer, the single-best-candidate rate is the operationally relevant number. Please report single-candidate and two-candidate rates separately in Fig. 4 and Table 3, and state the scoring rule in the abstract.
  2. [§3.1 and Appendix B, Fig. 11] The primary 10,000-orbit campaign is noise-free (§3.1); noise tests are deferred to Appendix B, where the dominant model scales σ to |RV| — heteroscedastic and atypical for spectroscopy, where error floors are roughly constant in km/s. The one realistic case (fixed σ = 2) exists but its global recovery fractions are never quoted in the text; Fig. 11 shows only binned curves. The abstract's 94%/83% figures therefore describe idealized data without saying so. Please add a compact table of global success rates vs. N_obs for each noise prescription (including σ = 2 and σ/|RV| = 0.05), and qualify the abstract numbers accordingly.
  3. [§5, Fig. 9, abstract] The abstract claims q and γ are recovered 'with success rates exceeding 99%' for N_obs ≤ 4, but §5/Fig. 9 show that with modest noise (σ = 0.05×RV) the 10%-tolerance rates drop to 90% (N=3) and 73% (N=2) for q, and only ~72% of systems fall within 20% for γ. Moreover, in the ideal N_obs = 2 case the OLS problem has two unknowns and two equations, so the noise-free solution is exact by construction and the >99% ideal rate is nearly tautological rather than evidence of skill. The abstract must carry the noise-dependent numbers, and the ideal-case framing should be corrected.
  4. [§2.2, §2.4.2, §3.1] The validation is in-family in three stacked ways: (i) synthetic signals are exact Keplerians, i.e., inside the searched template family; (ii) the eccentricity penalty (Eq. 12, e0 = 0.4, N0 = 8) suppresses high-e solutions in the same regime where the generation distribution (Fig. 3) is low-e weighted; (iii) the tuned weights (W_φ = 1.5, W_tr = 2, Δ0 = 3, W_Δv = 0.3) show no stated tuning protocol or holdout. Please document how the weights were chosen (and on what sample), and add at least one out-of-family stress test — e.g., orbits with e > 0.8 (outside the library grid) or perturbed/non-Keplerian curves — so readers can gauge performance when the truth is not representable by the template set.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.4, Fig. 8] Fig. 8 and §3.4 describe template-matching outputs as 'joint posterior distributions' with '1σ confidence intervals', yet §6 correctly states the method does not sample posteriors or produce formal uncertainties. Relabel as recovery/error distributions across the synthetic ensemble and remove 'confidence interval' language.
  2. [§2.4, Fig. 9, Eq. (6)] Notation inconsistencies: Eq. (1) uses W_Δλ L_Δλ while §2.4.1 and Eq. (9) define W_Δv L_Δv; Fig. 9 axis labels read 'e = 0' where the caption means σ_e = 0; 'σ_e = 0.05' in Fig. 9 vs 'σ/|RV|' in App. B should be unified. Also Eq. (6) uses a single σ although real errors are heteroscedastic — state what σ was used for the noise-free synthetics.
  3. [§2.5, Eq. (14)] Eq. (14): 'Gaussian noise (scaled by 0.1)' — 0.1 of what quantity? Give σ_perturb in absolute or fractional units and state how many perturbation realizations are run.
  4. [Table 1, §4.1] Table 1, HD 160934 at N_obs = 5: the period is recovered (3529 vs 3748 d) but e = 0.50 vs 0.65, ω = 20° vs 218°, K1 = 14.8 vs 7.9 km/s. The text's claim of 'consistently reproduces literature solutions' should be scoped to the period (and quantified with tolerances per parameter), or such rows flagged as partial recoveries.
  5. [§7] §7 calls the LS ~46% rate at N=5 the 'random-selection limit'. A random period draw over [0.1, 100] d would fall within 10% of truth far less often than 46%; either justify the phrase with an explicit random-guess baseline or delete it.
  6. [§1, §4.1] The 'theoretical sampling limit' N=6 is derived for SB1 (6 parameters); SB2 has 7, yet SB2 systems are included in the N=6 tests. Clarify the framing. Also the real-system subsampling is repeated only five times (§4.1); a larger number of draws (e.g., 50) would make the claimed stability more convincing.
  7. [§5, Eq. (10)] Typos: 'acurracy' (§5); Eq. (10) defines I_ϕ using X(ϕ) = |dX/dϕ| but the same symbol X is used for the template itself — use a distinct symbol for the gradient map.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: recovery statistics are scored against external injected/literature truth; templates and penalties are fixed a priori, not fitted to the success metric.

full rationale

Syntriod is an engineering estimator, not a first-principles derivation of a physical law. Its load-bearing claims are empirical recovery rates of known orbital parameters. The template library is a fixed precomputed (e, ω) grid of normalized Keplerians; period search maximizes a penalized likelihood against that library; success is defined by comparison to externally known true periods (synthetic injection or published solutions). That protocol does not make the recovered period equal to an input by construction. The SB2 q–γ branch uses the classical Wilson linear relation via OLS, again scored against known truth. Penalty weights (W_φ, W_tr, e0, etc.) are stated constants, not quantities fitted to the reported success fractions and then re-presented as predictions. The only self-citation (Barbaros et al. 2025) points to a forthcoming full-orbit framework and does not underwrite the present recovery numbers. Optimistic evaluation choices (two-candidate scoring for N_obs<7, noise-free primary campaign, truth inside the template family) affect correctness risk and claimed precision, not circularity of the derivation chain. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness import, or renamed known result is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work rests on standard Keplerian RV physics and OLS/GLS machinery, plus a discrete template library and several hand-chosen penalty weights that shape sparse-data behavior. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are algorithmic knobs, not cosmological constants.

free parameters (8)
  • Eccentricity penalty scale e_0 = 0.4
    Sets the characteristic eccentricity in ln P(e); chosen as 0.4 because asymmetries become visible above that value (§2.4.2).
  • Eccentricity penalty reference N_0 = 8
    Reference observation count scaling the eccentricity penalty strength (§2.4.2).
  • Differential-velocity likelihood weight W_Δv = 0.3
    Relative weight of SB2 Δv regularization in L_eff (§2.4.1).
  • Phase-coverage weight W_ϕ = 1.5
    Weight on (1−Δϕ_max) phase-coverage term (§2.4.2).
  • Trend-penalty weight W_tr and threshold Δ_0 = W_tr=2, Δ_0=3
    Strength and minimum likelihood improvement vs linear trend to accept an orbital model (§2.4.2).
  • Velocity-separation threshold f_th = 0.6
    Fractional threshold of Δv_max used in C_dv for SB2 blend suppression (§2.4.1).
  • Template grid (e, ω) resolution = standard: Δe=0.1, Δω=10°
    Standard library Δe=0.1, Δω=10° (292 templates); optional finer sets. Discretization is a design choice that bounds geometry recovery.
  • Monte Carlo perturbation scale for N_obs<7 = 0.1 × σ
    Gaussian noise scaled by 0.1 injected for robustness tests (§2.5).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Single-lined Keplerian RV orbits are described by six parameters (P,e,ω,T0,K,γ); SB2 adds a second K (or q), so N_obs≈6 is the formal sampling limit for SB1.
    Stated in §1 citing Hilditch 2001; defines the paper’s notion of sampling limit.
  • domain assumption Observed RVs are generated by pure Keplerian motion (plus optional Gaussian noise); no activity jitter, third bodies, or instrumental drifts in the core model.
    Synthetic generation and template library assume Keplerian morphologies only (§2.2, §3.1).
  • standard math Ordinary least squares / weighted linear least squares give adequate K, γ (and SB2 amplitudes) once phase and template shape are fixed.
    Used throughout §2.3–2.4 with citations to Bevington & Robinson.
  • domain assumption Wilson’s linear relation RV2 = −q RV1 + γ(1+q) constrains q and γ independent of period when N_obs≤4.
    Invoked in §2.1 and §5 citing Wilson 1941.
  • ad hoc to paper A finite discrete (e,ω) template library with e≤0.8 adequately represents the morphologies needed for initial guesses.
    Library construction in §2.2; e>0.8 and continuous geometry are not covered by the standard grid.
invented entities (1)
  • Syntriod algorithm (phase-domain RV template matcher + PSin + sparse linear fallback) independent evidence
    purpose: Provide fast, physically consistent initial orbital parameters for subsequent full orbit fits under sparse sampling.
    The named method is the paper’s contribution; it is software, not a new physical object. Independent evidence is the public code and recovery benchmarks against external truth.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 32641 in / 3804 out tokens · 75685 ms · 2026-07-31T05:40:20.555440+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present Syntriod, an orbital-phase domain radial velocity (RV) template-based algorithm designed to provide robust initial orbital parameter estimates for spectroscopic binaries across diverse observational sampling conditions. Rather than performing full orbital inference, Syntriod constrains the parameter space with physically consistent solutions to guide subsequent optimization procedures. We evaluate its performance using 10,000 synthetic Keplerian orbits spanning diverse configurations and sampling regimes. For well-sampled datasets ($N_{obs} \ge 8$), Syntriod recovers orbital periods with relative accuracies of order $10^{-3}$. At the theoretical sampling limit ($N_{obs} = 6$), the method maintains a ~94% success rate, while classical period-search techniques like Lomb-Scargle become increasingly affected by aliasing. Even below this limit ($N_{obs} = 5$), Syntriod recovers the correct orbital solution in ~83% of cases, showing gradual degradation rather than catastrophic failure. We further evaluate the method on 12 real spectroscopic binary systems (HD 160934, Phi Cyg, Capella A, Kepler 16, KIC 3858884, KIC 6867766, KIC 2445134, KIC 3003991, DU Boo, HL Dra, FP Boo, and AK Her) spanning broad orbital periods and eccentricities. Syntriod consistently reproduces literature solutions even when datasets are randomly subsampled to sparse regimes. Where a full Keplerian solution becomes underconstrained ($N_{obs} \le 4$), the algorithm transitions to linear dynamical relations, recovering parameters such as mass ratio ($q$) and systemic velocity ($\gamma$) with success rates exceeding 99%. These results demonstrate that Syntriod provides reliable, computationally efficient initial parameter estimates across well-sampled and sparse regimes, making it a practical pre-solver for modern orbit-fitting pipelines and large spectroscopic surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24926 by Emre Barbaros, Hasan Ak, N. Filiz Ak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic workflow of the Syntriod algorithm. The main solution is obtained through adaptive period scanning, phase-domain template matching, and likelihood evaluation. For sparsely sampled datasets (Nobs < 7), the auxiliary PSin module and Monte Carlo perturbation branch are activated to reinforce period estimation and solution stability. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Phase 100 50 0 50 100 Radial Velocity (km/s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase-domain visualization of synthetic radial velocity curves from the Syntriod library, fixed at e = 0.3. The profiles show the variation of the argument of periastron (ω) in 10◦ increments. Dashed lines indicate the specific cases of ω = 0◦ , 90◦ , 180◦ , and 270◦ , following the color map. the first stage, a logarithmic coarse search is performed across the interval [Pmin, Pmax]. The period grid is con… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Eccentricity distribution as a function of orbital period (P) for the synthetic radial velocity data generated to test the Syntriod algorithm. We create mock observed RV curves by randomly sam￾pling data points from the synthetic orbits. To eval￾uate the sensitivity of Syntriod to sampling density, we generate non-nested datasets for the optimal sam￾pling regime with Nobs = 10, the moderately sampled regim… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the fraction of successful and precise period estimates from both Syntriod and LS as a func￾tion of the number of observations drawn from the 10 000 synthetic datasets. In the optimal sampling regime with Nobs = 10, both methods achieve high successful esti￾4 Secondary predictions from the PSin module increase the suc￾cess rate by 5–10% for cases with Nobs = 6 and 5, respectively. mate rates (i.e.… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Left panels) The distribution of the relative period difference, (Pest − Ptrue)/Ptrue, obtained with Syntriod (black) and LS (blue) for Nobs = 10, 8, 6, and 5 from top to bottom. (Right panels) The dependence of the period residuals on the true period. periodograms such as LS, a small period error accumu￾lates into a significant phase drift when Tspan/P be￾comes large, progressively reducing the coherence… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Period recovery success rates of Syntriod (filled circles) and LS (open squares) for different Nobs values. Top and bottom panels represent the 10% and 1% accuracy thresholds, respectively. Performance is shown as a function of orbital period (P, left columns) and eccentricity (e, right columns), where markers indicate the mean values of the given bin. 1 0 1 2 3 log(Tspan/P) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Nobs = 1… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Observational limits and period recovery performance of Syntriod (filled circles) and LS (open squares) for different Nobs values. Left panels show the sample distributions of the log baseline-to-period ratio (log(Tspan/P), top) and maximum phase gap (∆ϕmax, bottom). The right panels show the corresponding period recovery success rates within a 10% accuracy threshold as a function of these parameters in a … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Corner plot showing the posterior probability distributions and covariances of the orbital parameters (P, T0, e, ω, K1, K2, γ and q). The blue dashed contours and histograms represent the results obtained using 6 observational data points (Nobs = 6). In contrast, the red solid contours indicate the solutions constrained by 10 data points (Nobs = 10). The diagonal panels show the 1D marginalized posteriors,… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Relative error distributions of the mass ratio (q; a) and systemic velocity (γ; b) for 10 000 simulated SB2 systems with extremely sparse observations. Each column compares ideal (σe = 0, top) and noisy (σe = 0.05, bottom) conditions. Black filled histograms represent Nobs = 3, while blue solid lines denote Nobs = 2. ing subsets of Nobs = 4, 3, and 2 spectroscopic obser￾vations for the SB2 benchmark system… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Verification of the mass ratio (q, blue) and sys￾temic velocity (γ, black) calculations by the Syntriod algo￾rithm in the extremely sparse data regime (Nobs < 5). The results correspond to the binary systems selected from the literature and analyzed in Tables 1 and 2. timates for the derived orbital parameters. While the method delivers physically consistent point estimates, it does not sample the posteri… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Period recovery success rates (within a 10% accuracy threshold) for 1,000 synthetic binary systems under varying heteroscedastic noise levels (scaled to σ/RV = 0.05 and 0.1, and fixed to σ = 2, columns from left to right). Rows display performance as a function of P, e, log(Tspan/P), and ∆ϕmax from top to bottom, where markers indicate the mean values of the given bin. Colors correspond to different Nobs … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Array programming with

    Harris, Charles R and Millman, K Jarrod and van der Walt, St. Array programming with. Nature , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  2. [2]

    2020 , publisher=

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E and others , journal=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  3. [3]

    Computing in science & engineering , volume=

    Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment , author=. Computing in science & engineering , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference , volume=

    Data structures for statistical computing in Python , author=. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference , volume=. 2010 , organization=

    2010

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC , pages=

    Numba: A LLVM-based Python JIT compiler , author=. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC , pages=

  6. [6]

    2009 , publisher=

    Python 3 Reference Manual , author=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  7. [7]

    and Nayak, Manoj and Khamari Sharma, Nachieketa and Das, R

    Kamilla, S.K. and Nayak, Manoj and Khamari Sharma, Nachieketa and Das, R. and Pattnaik, Sam , year =. Binary Star System- A Spectral Analysis , volume =

  8. [8]

    2003 , school=

    Spectral disentangling of close binary stars , author=. 2003 , school=

    2003

  9. [9]

    A Photoelectric Radial-Velocity Spectrometer , volume =

    Griffin, R.F , year =. A Photoelectric Radial-Velocity Spectrometer , volume =

  10. [10]

    , journal=

    Shannon, C.E. , journal=. Communication in the Presence of Noise , year=

  11. [11]

    2015 , eprint=

    The rvfit Code: A Detailed Adaptive Simulated Annealing Code for Fitting Binaries and Exoplanets Radial Velocities , author=. 2015 , eprint=

    2015

  12. [12]

    and Petigura, Erik A

    Fulton, Benjamin J. and Petigura, Erik A. and Blunt, Sarah and Sinukoff, Evan , year=. RadVel: The Radial Velocity Modeling Toolkit , volume=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8 , number=

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8

  13. [13]

    juliet: a versatile modelling tool for transiting and non-transiting exoplanetary systems , volume=

    Espinoza, Néstor and Kossakowski, Diana and Brahm, Rafael , year=. juliet: a versatile modelling tool for transiting and non-transiting exoplanetary systems , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2688 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2688

  14. [14]

    2020 , eprint=

    A Python Code to Determine Orbital Parameters of Spectroscopic Binaries , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  15. [15]

    , year = 1953, month = jun, volume =

    Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. , year = 1953, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1699114 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1063/1.1699114 1953

  16. [16]

    Biometrika , year = 1970, month = apr, volume =

    Monte Carlo Sampling Methods using Markov Chains and their Applications. Biometrika , year = 1970, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 1970

  17. [17]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=

    Foreman-Mackey, Daniel and Hogg, David W. and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=. <tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer , volume=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , publisher=. doi:10.1086/670067 , number=

    doi:10.1086/670067

  18. [18]

    Nested Sampling. Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering: 24th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering , year = 2004, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.1835238 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1063/1.1835238 2004

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    The Joker: A Custom Monte Carlo Sampler for Binary-star and Exoplanet Radial Velocity Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5e50 , archivePrefix =. 1610.07602 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    VanderPlas, Jacob T. , year=. Understanding the Lomb–Scargle Periodogram , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab766 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab766

  21. [21]

    Deeming, T. J. , year=. Fourier analysis with unequally-spaced data , journal=

  22. [22]

    10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

    The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram - A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:200811296", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200811296", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

  23. [23]

    Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica® Support , publisher=

    Gregory, Phil , year=. Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica® Support , publisher=

  24. [24]

    Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences

  25. [25]

    An Introduction to Close Binary Stars

  26. [26]

    , year = 1941, month = jan, volume =

    On the Determination of Mass Ratios of Spectroscopic Binaries. , year = 1941, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1086/144239 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/144239 1941

  27. [27]

    The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , year = 1958, volume =

    Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , year = 1958, volume =

    1958

  28. [28]

    2007 , publisher=

    Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  29. [29]

    Statistical properties of exoplanets. IV. The period-eccentricity relations of exoplanets and of binary stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041219 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410732 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    A Survey of Stellar Families: Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1007.0414 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    S _ B ^ 9 : The ninth catalogue of spectroscopic binary orbits. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041213 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406573 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    and Kiyaeva, O

    Tokovinin, A. and Kiyaeva, O. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2825 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2825 2015

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , year = 2016, month = jun, volume =

    corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python. The Journal of Open Source Software , year = 2016, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.21105/joss.00024 , adsurl =

    doi:10.21105/joss.00024 2016

  35. [35]

    Astronomical Society of India Conference Series , year = 2014, series =

    iSpec: An integrated software framework for the analysis of stellar spectra. Astronomical Society of India Conference Series , year = 2014, series =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1312.4545 , archivePrefix =. 1312.4545 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.4545 2014

  36. [36]

    and Paletou, Frédéric and Manset, N

    Petit, Pascal and Louge, Thierry and Théado, S. and Paletou, Frédéric and Manset, N. and MORIN, Julien and Marsden, Stephen and Jeffers, S.V. , year =. Polar Base: A Database of High-Resolution Spectropolarimetric Stellar Observations , volume =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , doi =

  37. [37]

    O'Connell, D. J. K. , year =. The so-called O'Connell effect , volume =. Publications of the Riverview College Observatory , doi =

  38. [38]

    , author=

    The Orbit of the Spectroscopic Binary Phi Cygni. , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , year=

  39. [39]

    2015 , month =

    Torres, Guillermo and Claret, Antonio and Pavlovski, Krešimir and Dotter, Aaron , title =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/26 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/26 2015

  40. [40]

    and Mahadevan, Suvrath and Deshpande, Rohit and Wright, Jason T

    Bender, Chad F. and Mahadevan, Suvrath and Deshpande, Rohit and Wright, Jason T. and Roy, Arpita and Terrien, Ryan C. and Sigurdsson, Steinn and Ramsey, Lawrence W. and Schneider, Donald P. and Fleming, Scott W. , year=. THE SDSS-HET SURVEY OF KEPLER ECLIPSING BINARIES: SPECTROSCOPIC DYNAMICAL MASSES OF THE KEPLER-16 CIRCUMBINARY PLANET HOSTS , volume=. T...

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/l31 2041

  41. [41]

    and Silva, R

    Maceroni, Carla and Lehmann, H. and Silva, R. and Montalbán, Josefina and Lee, Chung-Uk and Ak, Ha and Deshpande, R. and Yakut, Kadri and Debosscher, Jonas and Guo, Zhao and Kim, Sunghyok and Lee, Jae-Woo and Southworth, J. , year =. KIC 3858884: A hybrid δ Scuti pulsator in a highly eccentric eclipsing binary , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , doi =

  42. [42]

    and Agol, Eric and Ak, Hasan and Bastien, Fabienne and Bizyaev, Dmitry and Crepp, Justin and Ford, Eric and Frinchaboy, Peter and Zasowski, Gail , year =

    Fleming, Scott and Mahadevan, Suvrath and Deshpande, Rohit and Bender, Chad and Terrien, Ryan and Marchwinski, Robert and Wang, Ji and Roy, Arpita and Stassun, Keivan and Prieto, Carlos and Cunha, Katia and Smith, V. and Agol, Eric and Ak, Hasan and Bastien, Fabienne and Bizyaev, Dmitry and Crepp, Justin and Ford, Eric and Frinchaboy, Peter and Zasowski, ...

  43. [43]

    and Hambleton, Kelly and Fleming, Scott W

    Mahadevan, Suvrath and Bender, Chad F. and Hambleton, Kelly and Fleming, Scott W. and Deshpande, Rohit and Conroy, Kyle and Matijevič, Gal and Hebb, Leslie and Roy, Arpita and Ak, Hasan and Leban, Blaž and Prša, Andrej , title =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3793 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3793 2019

  44. [44]

    and Lu, Wenxian and Mochnacki, Stefan W

    Pribulla, Theodor and Rucinski, Slavek M. and Lu, Wenxian and Mochnacki, Stefan W. and Conidis, George and Blake, R. M. and DeBond, Heide and Thomson, J. R. and Pych, Wojtek and Ogłoza, Waldemar and Siwak, Michal , title =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1086/505536 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/505536 2006

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Orbits of six late-type active-chromosphere binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0381-3 , archivePrefix =. 1004.1835 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Radial Velocity Studies of Close Binary Stars. X. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/431226 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0503041 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    The Observatory , year = 2013, month = dec, volume =

    Spectroscopic binary orbits from photoelectric radial velocities - Paper 233: HD 17922, HD 78899, HD 103613, and HD 160934, with a Note on HD 113449. The Observatory , year = 2013, month = dec, volume =

    2013

  48. [48]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , year = 2015, month = jan, volume =

    Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , year = 2015, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    The Gaia mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , archivePrefix =. 1609.04153 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Optimal placement of a limited number of observations for period searches. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054764 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0605421 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Variable stars: Which Nyquist frequency?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1999102 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9808176 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    and Catala, C

    Rauer, H. and Catala, C. and Aerts, C. and Appourchaux, T. and Benz, W. and Brandeker, A. and Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. and Deleuil, M. and Gizon, L. and Goupil, M.-J. and Güdel, M. and Janot-Pacheco, E. and Mas-Hesse, M. and Pagano, I. and Piotto, G. and Pollacco, D. and Santos, Ċ. and Smith, A. and Suárez, J.-C. and Szabó, R. and Udry, S. and Adibekyan,...

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    A period-finding method for sparse randomly spaced observations or ``How long is a piece of string ?''. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/203.4.917 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/203.4.917

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Period determination using phase dispersion minimization. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/156444 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/156444

  55. [55]

    Very Fast Simulated Re-Annealing , volume =

    Ingber, A and Ingber, Lester , year =. Very Fast Simulated Re-Annealing , volume =. Mathematical and Computer Modelling , doi =

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/301513 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0006396 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2012, month = sep, volume =

    The Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST). Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2012, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003 2012

  58. [58]

    Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2019, volume =

    The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2019, volume =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1907.10688 , archivePrefix =. 1907.10688 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.10688 2019

  59. [59]

    Science , keywords =

    Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1185402 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1126/science.1185402

  60. [60]

    Turkish Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Bayesian Radial Velocity Solver: BRaVe. Turkish Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.55064/tjaa.1598320 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.55064/tjaa.1598320

  61. [61]

    J. A. Hartigan and P. M. Hartigan , journal =. The Dip Test of Unimodality , urldate =

  62. [62]

    , year = 1971, month = aug, volume =

    Spectroscopic binaries with circular orbits. , year = 1971, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1086/111159 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/111159 1971