Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 47 references

Parent valley, orbital character, and moiré symmetry form a general map from monolayer band edges to emergent flat-band Hamiltonians across all 2D lattices.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:18 UTC pith:4HD6RKHT

load-bearing objection A real atlas-plus-symmetry dictionary that moves moiré model-building past the hexagonal Γ/K default; DFT meV-scale caveats are real but standard and do not sink the classification. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24944 v1 pith:4HD6RKHT submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Organizing Principles for Moir\'e Quantum Matter

Qiaoling Xu , Yifan Gao , Tao Zhang , Ammon Fischer , Yi Jiang , Hanqi Pi , Zike Fan , Dongdong An
show 11 more authors
Kun Zhou Yingjian Li Yongqing Li Yuhao Fu Lei Wang Lijun Zhang B. Andrei Bernevig Dante M. Kennes Enge Wang Angel Rubio Lede Xian
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords moiré flat bandstwisted bilayersvalley-orbital-symmetryelementary band representationsHubbard modelsnonsymmorphic symmetryboundary valleysvan der Waals heterostructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Most discussions of moiré flat bands lean on a few hexagonal cases tied to Γ or K valleys. This paper argues that view is too narrow. From more than 600 fully relaxed twisted bilayers spanning hexagonal, square, rectangular, and oblique lattices, it shows that four inputs—where the parent band edge sits in momentum space, what local orbital character it carries, the moiré space group, and the symmetry labels of the resulting minibands—organize the low-energy Hamiltonian that emerges. That map predicts real-space lattices and orbital content (trigonal, honeycomb, square, checkerboard, kagome-like; single-orbital, multi-orbital, multi-site), when spin-orbit coupling produces topology outside the usual K-valley setting, when nonsymmorphic symmetry forces flat-band crossings, when boundary valleys create quasi-one-dimensional dispersions, and when nearby generic-momentum valleys fuse into multi-valley multiplets. A sympathetic reader cares because the framework turns parent-material electronic structure into a design dictionary for correlated, topological, and symmetry-enforced moiré phases rather than a short list of famous compounds.

Core claim

The authors claim that the tuple of parent band-edge valley momentum k0, effective local orbital Ok0, moiré space group GM, and little-group irreps of the target minibands is a general organizing map that determines the Wannier content, band connectivity, topology, and momentum-space Q-lattice of the emergent low-energy moiré Hamiltonian, revealing routes beyond the conventional single-orbital Γ/K paradigm across all 2D lattice classes.

What carries the argument

The valley-orbital-symmetry design map (k0, Ok0, GM, {ρk}) → (W, C, I; Q-lattice): parent valley and orbital fix the continuum Q-lattice and internal degrees of freedom; moiré symmetry and computed irreps fix Wannier centers, connectivity, and topology via elementary band-representation analysis on relaxed DFT minibands.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on treating fully relaxed commensurate DFT supercells at the discrete twist angles studied, plus symmetry analysis of those band edges, as faithful stand-ins for the isolated low-energy states that matter in real twisted devices.

What would settle it

For a table entry such as multi-orbital topological MgBr2 or quasi-1D X-valley Cu2WSe4, measure whether gating isolates the predicted manifold with the stated lattice/orbital content and topology or 1D dispersion; a clear mismatch in Wannier centers, connectivity, or valley origin would falsify the assigned model.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Moiré Hubbard simulators need not be limited to honeycomb or triangular single-orbital models; square, checkerboard, four-orbital square, and multi-orbital trigonal platforms are design targets from parent band edges.
  • Symmetry-indicated topology in flat bands can be sought from SOC-split multi-orbital manifolds, not only from conventional K-valley reconstruction.
  • Nonsymmorphic moiré space groups are a route to forced flat-band semimetallic connectivity rather than isolated Chern-like bands.
  • M-valley hexagonal and X-valley square/rectangular parents systematically yield quasi-one-dimensional moiré dispersions via boundary-valley Q-lattices.
  • Band edges at generic momenta can be engineered into coupled multi-valley orbital multiplets instead of independent valley flavors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-throughput screening of 2D databases could rank candidates by (k0, orbital, likely GM) before costly supercell relaxations, turning the map into a pre-filter for device materials.
  • Interaction estimates and continuum models for the multi-orbital and multi-site cases will likely need orbital-resolved Coulomb matrices, not single-band U, before correlated-phase predictions are reliable.
  • If nHSP multiplet formation is generic, small strain or dielectric environment shifts that move valley separations could switch a device between connected kagome-like and split one-plus-two-band sectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a valley-orbital-symmetry organizing map (Eq. 1) that connects the parent monolayer's band-edge momentum k0 and effective local orbital content, the moiré space group G_M, and the little-group irreps of the target minibands, to the Wannier content, connectivity, topology, and momentum-space Q-lattice of the emergent low-energy moiré Hamiltonian. The map is implemented through a first-principles atlas of more than 600 fully relaxed commensurate twisted bilayers spanning all four 2D lattice classes, using band unfolding, orbital projections, and EBR/compatibility analysis against Bilbao irreps. The main outcomes are: (i) a symmetry-based dictionary from isolated flat-band manifolds to Hubbard-model realizations (single-orbital triangular/honeycomb/square, multi-orbital trigonal and four-orbital square, checkerboard, kagome-like; Table I, Fig. 2); (ii) two routes to topology beyond the K-valley TMD setting — SOC-driven Wannier obstruction in multi-orbital manifolds (MgBr2, CdS, SnSe2, BiClTe) and nonsymmorphic symmetry-enforced semimetallic connectivity (GeS, ZrIN, CuClO2, AlP); (iii) boundary-valley (M/X) Q-lattices producing quasi-one-dimensional flat bands (Sec. V, Figs. 3–4); and (iv) coupled multi-valley multiplets from non-high-symmetry-point (nHSP) valleys, exemplified by the kagome-like 1+2 multiplet in H-phase GaS versus the split 1 and 2 sectors in R-phase GaS (Sec. VI, Fig. 5). All structural and symmetry data are deposited in the publicly可用的TB

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful and timely contribution. The field's intuition is dominated by Γ- and K-valley mechanisms in hexagonal crystals; a systematic, mechanism-organized survey across all 2D lattice classes, with each band structure converted into an effective-model assignment rather than a ranked candidate list, addresses a real gap. Several strengths deserve explicit credit: (1) the classification uses standard external tools (EBR/compatibility analysis per Bradlyn et al. and the Bilbao server) rather than bespoke fitting, so individual assignments are independently checkable; (2) the full dataset is released through the TBMSD database, making the survey reproducible in principle; (3) the material-specific outputs — e.g., the MgBr2 symmetry-indicated obstruction, the GeS nonsymmorphic semimetal, the GaS H/R contrast — are concrete, falsifiable predictions that experimental and many-body follow-up can test; (4) the H/R GaS comparison (Sec. VI) is a genuinely nice demonstration that k0 and G_M jointly select the multiplet structure, which substantiates the organizing-map claim better than any single example would. The atlas-scale DFT effort (>600 relaxed commensurate

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VI, Fig. 5; Sec. IV (MgBr2)] Sec. VI / Fig. 5: the nHSP-multiplet motif is the softest load-bearing claim. The H-phase GaS 1+2 manifold rests on three C3-related valleys near Γ lying close enough to the valence edge to hybridize into one connected three-band manifold. Off-Γ ('Mexican hat') valence edges in the GaS/GaSe/InSe family are known to shift by tens of meV with functional, SOC treatment, and lattice parameters, so both the valley positions k0 and the isolation of the three-band manifold — the two inputs that license the EBR decomposition A2↑G@1a ⊕ E↑G@1a — are at or below the reliable resolution of vdW-corrected PBE. Because this is presented as one of the five motifs (Sec. VII) rather than a single material row, the authors should provide at least one robustness check: e.g., a hybrid-functional (HSE) or G0W0 benchmark of the monolayer valence-edge structure and of the twisted-bilayer manifold isolation for
  2. [Sec. II, Fig. 1b; Sec. III, Table I] Sec. II / Fig. 1b and the Hubbard-model dictionary of Sec. III: all calculations are at commensurate twist angles of roughly 7–25°, where moiré periods are short. The paper reports that >75% of systems have band-edge bandwidths below 200 meV and frames these as 'narrow-band candidates', but 50–200 meV is large compared to the interaction scales relevant for the Hubbard-model physics the dictionary assigns, and both the bandwidth and the Wannier-center character can change qualitatively toward the small angles (1–4°) where most moiré correlation physics is realized. The manuscript should state explicitly how the Sec. III/Table I assignments are expected to evolve with angle: for at least one or two representative rows (e.g., Tl4SnS3 square, MgBr2 trigonal), an angle series showing that the Wannier content W and the (E)BR diagnosis are angle-robust — or an honest statement of the angular w
  3. [Table I (CuBr); Sec. III] Table I, CuBr row: the four-orbital square assignment B↑G@4j carries an asterisk because the (E)BR was obtained without SOC. Given that Br is moderately heavy and the four-orbital-square result is highlighted in both the abstract and Sec. III as one of the non-canonical Hilbert spaces, the assignment should be confirmed with SOC included, or the claim in the main text should be correspondingly qualified. This is a small, well-defined calculation and currently the only flagship row whose symmetry diagnosis is explicitly provisional.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Title page] Affiliations 12 and 13 both read 'State Key Laboratory of ... College of Physics/Materials, Jilin University' and 'National Laboratory of Solid-State Microstructures, Nanjing University' respectively appear twice (9 and 13) with different department names; please check the author-affiliation mapping.
  2. [Sec. V; Ref. [47]] Ref. 47 is cited as 'in. prep. (2026)'; since the X-point continuum treatment is deferred to this follow-up, the main text should make clear which statements in Sec. V (checkerboard Q-lattice for X valleys) are established here versus deferred. Also fix the 'in. prep.' typographical style.
  3. [Sec. I, Eq. (1)] Eq. (1): the symbol {ρ_k}_{k∈HSPM} is used before HSPM is defined; please define the high-symmetry-point set notation at first use. Similarly, the semicolon separating symmetry-classification from continuum-model outputs is explained in the text but would benefit from a one-line gloss in the figure caption of Fig. 1a.
  4. [Sec. V, Eq. (2)] Eq. (2): the fitted tunneling amplitudes (w1, w2, w3, w'_AA and SOC terms) for GaTe are said to be in SI Sec. V.E; please state in the main text how many fit parameters enter and whether the fit is to the full band structure or only the low-energy manifold, so the reader can judge how constraining the continuum model is.
  5. [Fig. 1b] Fig. 1b: the horizontal dashed lines at 50/100 meV and the vertical dotted threshold lines are hard to parse without numeric labels for the counts of systems below each threshold; consider adding the counts directly. The phrase 'more than 75% ... below 200 meV' should also specify whether SOC is included in these bandwidths.
  6. [Fig. 2; Table I] Fig. 2 panels h–n show bands with and without SOC, but the text does not always state which version the Table I (E)BR assignments correspond to (beyond the CuBr asterisk). A per-row SOC indicator in Table I would remove ambiguity.
  7. [Sec. IV] Sec. IV: for CdS, SnSe2 and BiClTe the obstruction is asserted with details deferred to the SI; a one-line summary of the obstructed irrep content for at least one of these in the main text would help establish that the mechanism is genuinely shared rather than analogous.
  8. [Sec. II] The exfoliation-energy cutoff of 164 meV/atom and the bandwidth thresholds (50/100/200 meV) are reasonable but arbitrary; a sentence justifying their sensitivity (e.g., how many materials are gained/lost near the cutoff) would aid reproducibility of the survey design.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the atlas is an independent DFT+EBR survey; the organizing map classifies computed outputs rather than predicting them from fitted or self-defined inputs.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: select monolayers → build commensurate twisted bilayers → fully relax with vdW-DFT → unfold bands and read off (k0, O_k0) → compute little-group irreps {ρ_k} under G_M → apply standard EBR/compatibility analysis (Bradlyn/Bernevig topological quantum chemistry, external tool) to assign W, C, I, and use valley geometry for Q-lattices. Equation (1) is an explicit design map that organizes these computed descriptors; it does not define the outputs in terms of themselves or fit a parameter and rename the fit as a prediction. Continuum models (e.g. M-valley Eq. 2) are secondary illustrations that may fit SOC terms to DFT in the SI; they are not the central claim. Author-overlapping prior work on M-point twisting (Ref. 26) is cited as earlier establishment of that mechanism and is extended here with new materials, X-valley and nHSP cases computed in this atlas—not presupposed as the result. EBR diagnosis and the 600+ first-principles band structures are independent content. No self-definitional loop, no uniqueness theorem imported to forbid alternatives, and no renaming of a known empirical law presented as derivation. Score 0 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central classification rests on standard electronic-structure and topological-quantum-chemistry machinery plus domain choices about which monolayers and commensurate angles represent moiré band-edge physics. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters appear only in secondary continuum fits, not in the EBR-based model dictionary.

free parameters (3)
  • Continuum tunneling and SOC amplitudes (w_i, spin-orbit terms) in M-valley model Eq. (2) = Material-dependent fits (values in SI)
    Fitted to DFT bands for representative M-valley systems (SI Sec. V.E); used to illustrate quasi-1D nesting, not to establish the atlas classifications.
  • Exfoliation-energy cutoff 164 meV/atom (~1.5× black phosphorus) = 164 meV/atom
    Hand-chosen materials filter in Sec. II that defines which monolayers enter the atlas; changes the candidate pool but not the organizing map itself.
  • Bandwidth reporting thresholds 50 / 100 / 200 meV = 50, 100, 200 meV
    Descriptive cutoffs in Fig. 1b and Sec. II for counting narrow-band candidates; not used as physical fitting parameters.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Semi-local DFT plus vdW corrections yields correct band-edge valley location, orbital character and isolation for the surveyed semiconductors after full relaxation.
    Sec. II atlas construction; all Wannier and topology assignments inherit DFT band ordering and gaps.
  • domain assumption Elementary band representations and compatibility relations (topological quantum chemistry) diagnose Wannierizability, connectivity and symmetry-indicated topology of isolated moiré manifolds from little-group irreps.
    Invoked throughout Secs. III–IV and Table I; citations [31–33], Bilbao server.
  • domain assumption Commensurate integer-matrix supercells at the studied twist angles are faithful proxies for the low-energy moiré physics of interest (including continuum Q-lattice structure).
    Sec. II generalized lattice-transformation construction; underlies every band structure shown.
  • domain assumption Band-edge manifolds separable from remote bands under electrostatic gating are the relevant Hilbert spaces for correlated moiré models.
    Stated selection criterion in Sec. II (finite-gap monolayers, exfoliation filter).
  • domain assumption Emergent momentum-space nonsymmorphic symmetry (effective mirror in the rigid-shift limit) enforces energetic nesting and quasi-1D dispersion in boundary-valley Q-lattices.
    Sec. V, building on prior M-valley theory [26,45]; used to interpret GaTe, AgClO4, Cu2WSe4, TlF dispersions.
invented entities (2)
  • Valley–orbital–symmetry design map (Eq. 1) independent evidence
    purpose: Organize parent descriptors into Wannier, connectivity, topology and Q-lattice outputs for moiré Hamiltonians.
    Framing device for the atlas rather than a new physical degree of freedom; content is standard inputs (k0, orbitals, space group, irreps) packaged as a map.
  • Twisted Bilayer Moiré Superlattice Database (TBMSD) independent evidence
    purpose: Deposit structures, bands and symmetry labels for >600 bilayers.
    Data product supporting the atlas; falsifiable by independent DFT.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 29686 in / 4149 out tokens · 85990 ms · 2026-07-31T05:18:52.474574+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Moir\'e flat bands in van der Waals bilayers are usually discussed through a small set of mechanisms associated with the $\Gamma$ and $K$ valleys of hexagonal crystals, and more recently with $M$-valleys systems. Here we show that this view is incomplete. The momentum-space location and effective local orbital character of the monolayer's band edge, in conjunction with the moir\'e symmetry and the symmetry representations of the resulting bands, provide a general set of organizing variables for the emergent low-energy moir\'e Hamiltonian. Applying fully relaxed first-principles calculations, band unfolding and symmetry-representation analysis to more than 600 commensurate twisted bilayers spanning all 2D lattice classes, we identify several routes to moir\'e quantum matter beyond the conventional single-orbital paradigm. The resulting flat bands realize trigonal, honeycomb, square, checkerboard and kagome-like Hubbard models with single-orbital, multi-orbital and multi-site Hilbert spaces; spin-orbit-coupled multi-orbital flat bands exhibit symmetry-indicated topology beyond the conventional $K$-valley setting; and nonsymmorphic moir\'e symmetries enforce semimetallic flat-band connectivity. Analogous quasi-one-dimensional flat-band structures are found in $M$-valley hexagonal systems and $X$-valley square or rectangular systems resulting from emergent momentum-space nonsymmorphic symmetries. Separately, coupled multi-valley manifolds with kagome-like connectivity are identified in several systems whose parent band edges lie at non-high-symmetry points. These results establish a valley-orbital-symmetry framework for connecting parent-material electronic structure to emergent moir\'e Hamiltonians relevant to correlated, topological and symmetry-enforced moir\'e phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24944 by Ammon Fischer, Angel Rubio, B. Andrei Bernevig, Dante M. Kennes, Dongdong An, Enge Wang, Hanqi Pi, Kun Zhou, Lede Xian, Lei Wang, Lijun Zhang, Qiaoling Xu, Tao Zhang, Yifan Gao, Yi Jiang, Yingjian Li, Yongqing Li, Yuhao Fu, Zike Fan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: k-m make this quasi-one-dimensional character explicit. Boundary-valley twisting therefore provides a general route to quasi-one-dimensional flat bands in both hexagonal and non-hexagonal moir´e materials. A more complete continuum treatment of the square-lattice X-point problem is being developed in a follow-up work [47]; here we focus on its first-principles manifestations and on how the underlying valle… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, et al., Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Uncon- ventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, et al., Simulation of hubbard model physics in wse2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 353 17 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yumigeta, et al., Mott and generalized wigner crystal states in wse2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature 579, 359 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. Devakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, et al., Quantum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ e bands, Nature600, 641 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Wang, E.-M

    L. Wang, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, L. Xian, D. A. Rhodes, C. Tan, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, Y. Bai, B. Kim, et al., Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature materials19, 861 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, et al., Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al., Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer mote2, Physical Review X13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    W. Zhao, B. Shen, Z. Tao, Z. Han, K. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Gate-tunable heavy fermions in a moir´ e kondo lattice, Nature616, 61 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    P. Wang, G. Yu, Y. H. Kwan, Y. Jia, S. Lei, S. Klemenz, F. A. Cevallos, R. Singha, T. Devakul, K. Watanabe, et al., One-dimensional luttinger liquids in a two-dimensional moir´ e lattice, Nature605, 57 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    W. Zhao, K. Kang, Y. Zhang, P. Kn¨ uppel, Z. Tao, L. Li, C. L. Tschirhart, E. Redekop, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Realization of the haldane chern insulator in a moir´ e lattice, Nature Physics20, 275 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    L. Wei, Q. Li, M. U. Rehman, Y. He, D. An, S. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Claassen, K. S. Novoselov, et al., Valley charge-transfer insulator in twisted double bilayer wse2, Nature Communica- tions16, 1185 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Y. Xia, Z. Han, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, P. Kn¨ uppel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Bandwidth-tuned mott transition and superconductivity in moir´ e wse2, Nature , 1 (2026)

    2026

  14. [14]

    Y. Guo, J. Cenker, A. Fischer, D. Mu˜ noz-Segovia, J. Pack, L. Holtzman, L. Klebl, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Barmak, et al., Angle evolution of the superconducting phase diagram in twisted bilayer wse2, Nature , 1 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    L. Xian, M. Claassen, D. Kiese, M. M. Scherer, S. Trebst, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Realization of nearly dispersionless bands with strong orbital anisotropy from destructive interference in twisted bilayer mos2, Nature communications12, 5644 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Angeli and A

    M. Angeli and A. H. MacDonald,γvalley transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2021826118 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, P. X. Nguyen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Relativistic mott transition in twisted wse2 tetralayers, Nature Materials24, 1935 (2025). 18

    1935

  18. [18]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalco- genide moir´ e bands, Physical review letters121, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Q. Xu, A. Fischer, N. Tancogne-Dejean, T. Zhang, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, A. Ru- bio, and L. Xian, Engineering 2d square lattice hubbard models in 90°twisted gex/snx (x= s, se) moir´ e superlattices, Physical Review X15, 041049 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Kariyado, A

    T. Kariyado, A. Vishwanath, and Z.-X. Luo, Single-band square-lattice hubbard model from twisted bilayer c 568, Physical Review B112, 125159 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Kariyado, Y

    T. Kariyado, Y. Wicaksono, A. Vishwanath, P. Volkov, and Z.-X. Luo, Moir´ e inγ-valley square lattice: Copper- and iron-based superconductor simulation in a single device (2026), arXiv:2603.11153 [cond- mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    K. Bao, R. Shi, H. Wang, L. Huang, and J. Wang, Moir\’e ferroelectricity-driven band engineering in twisted square bilayers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15140 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, M. Claassen, and A. Rubio, One-dimensional flat bands in twisted bilayer germanium selenide, Nature communications11, 1124 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Claassen, L

    M. Claassen, L. Xian, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Ultra-strong spin–orbit coupling and topological moir´ e engineering in twisted zrs2 bilayers, Nature communications13, 4915 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Y. Gao, A. Fischer, L. Klebl, M. Claassen, A. Rubio, L. Huang, D. Kennes, and L. Xian, Moir´ e engineering of nonsymmorphic symmetries and hourglass superconductors (2022), arXiv:2207.02806 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    C˘ alug˘ aru, Y

    D. C˘ alug˘ aru, Y. Jiang, H. Hu, H. Pi, J. Yu, M. G. Vergniory, J. Shan, C. Felser, L. M. Schoop, D. K. Efetov, et al., Moir´ e materials based on m-point twisting, Nature643, 376 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, L. Xian, A. Georges, A. J. Millis, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, D. N. Basov, A. N. Pasupathy, and A. Rubio, Moir´ e heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator, Nat. Phys.17, 155 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    T. Bao, R. Xu, H. Li, X. Gong, Z. Tang, J. Fu, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, Deep-learning database of density functional theory hamiltonians for twisted materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06449 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Nakatsuji, J

    N. Nakatsuji, J. Cano, and V. Cr´ epel, High-throughput discovery of moir\’e homobilayers guided by topology and energetics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15851 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Kaplan, A

    D. Kaplan, A. C. Tyner, E. Y. Andrei, and J. Pixley, Machine learning assisted high throughput prediction of moir\’e materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16892 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, Z. Wang, J. Cano, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn, Graph theory data for topological quantum chemistry, Phys. Rev. E96, 023310 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, J. Cano, C. Felser, B. A. Bernevig, D. Orobengoa, G. de la Flor, and M. I. Aroyo, Double crystallographic groups and their representations on the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Journal of Applied Crystallography50, 1457 (2017). 19

    2017

  34. [34]

    J. Zhou, L. Shen, M. D. Costa, K. A. Persson, S. P. Ong, P. Huck, Y. Lu, X. Ma, Y. Chen, H. Tang, et al., 2dmatpedia, an open computational database of two-dimensional materials from top-down and bottom-up approaches, Scientific data6, 86 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Mounet, M

    N. Mounet, M. Gibertini, P. Schwaller, D. Campi, A. Merkys, A. Marrazzo, T. Sohier, I. E. Castelli, A. Cepellotti, G. Pizzi, et al., Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoli- ation of experimentally known compounds, Nature nanotechnology13, 246 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Jiang, U

    Y. Jiang, U. Petralanda, G. Skorupskii, Q. Xu, H. Pi, D. Calugaru, H. Haoyu, J. Xie, R. A. Mustaf, P. H¨ ohn,et al., 2d theoretically twistable material database, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09741 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. de la Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bilbao crystallographic server, Bulg. Chem. Commun43, 183 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao crystallographic server: I. databases and crystallographic computing programs, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials221, 15 (2006)

    2006

  39. [39]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao crystallographic server. ii. representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography62, 115 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. MacDonald, Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Physical review letters122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  41. [41]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Cr´ epel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nature communications12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Fractional chern insulator in twisted bilayer mote 2, Physical Review Letters132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern insulator in moir´ e mote2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al., Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    C. Lei, P. T. Mahon, and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e band theory for m-valley twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review Letters135, 196402 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    M.-R. Li, D. Calugaru, Y. Jiang, H. Pi, A. Fischer, H. Schl¨ omer, L. Klebl, M. G. Vergniory, D. M. Kennes, S. A. Parameswaran, H. Yao, B. A. Bernevig, and H. Hu, Emergent interacting phases in the strong coupling limit of twisted m-valley moir´ e systems: Application to snse2 (2025), arXiv:2508.10098 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Y. Gao, A. Fischer, Q. Xu, T. Zhang, Y. Jiang, H. Pi, Z. Fan, D. An, K. Zhou, Y. Li, Y. Fu, L. Zhang, B. A. Bernevig, E. Wang, A. Rubio, D. M. Kennes, and L. Xian, Moir´ e materials based on x-point twisting, in. prep. (2026)

    2026