Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 299 references

MOSAIC-FL, a micro-service based privacy-preserving framework with application to genomics

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A micro-service federated-learning system can train shared models under threshold homomorphic encryption without losing accuracy, even on genomic breast-cancer data.

desk verdict Solid systems integration of known threshold CKKS into a micro-service FL stack; accuracy claims hold, but the per-round key-renewal cost that underwrites their attack mitigation is not isolated in the timing tables. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25107 v1 pith:RGDD4K3T submitted 2026-07-27 cs.CR cs.LG

Paul Largillier , Karl Paygambar , Cédric Gouy-Pailler , Vincent Meyer , Mallek Mziou , Oana Stan This is my paper
classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords FederatedLearningHomomorphicEncryptionThresholdCKKSSecureAggregationMicro-servicesBRCASubtypingTCGAPrivacy-preservingML
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents MOSAIC-FL, a modular federated-learning framework built as isolated micro-services that keep model training, cryptography, and orchestration strictly separate. Its central promise is that an orchestration server can average client model updates while they stay encrypted, and that the result can be decrypted only when at least t out of N clients cooperate. Security is maintained by flooding noise and by renewing the collective keys every round, blocking a known key-recovery attack on synchronized decryptors. On both a standard image task and a realistic breast-cancer subtyping task from TCGA gene-expression data, the encrypted runs match cleartext accuracy, and for the heavier Transformer the cryptographic overhead is only a small fraction of total round time. A sympathetic reader cares because hospitals and genomic labs could collaborate on sensitive models without handing plaintext parameters or decryption power to any single party.

What carries the argument

Threshold CKKS (t-out-of-N multiparty CKKS): clients jointly hold Shamir shares of the secret key so the server can homomorphically average encrypted updates and any t honest clients can collaboratively decrypt the aggregate without ever assembling the full secret.

What would settle it

Run the same N=4, t=3 EMNIST and TCGA Transformer protocols for 100 rounds and check whether the ThHE accuracy curves diverge from the cleartext baseline, or whether a coalition of t colluding clients can recover plaintext aggregates from collected partial decryptions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MOSAIC-FL shows that threshold CKKS secure aggregation, embedded in a gRPC micro-service architecture with a finite-state machine for synchronization, produces model accuracy indistinguishable from unprotected federated averaging on both EMNIST CNNs and TCGA BRCA Transformers, while remaining fault-tolerant to client drop-outs down to a chosen threshold t.

Load-bearing premise

The security claim holds only if the server and at least t clients stay semi-honest and no set of participants colludes enough to pool secret shares.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Genomic consortia can train shared subtype classifiers without any single site or the aggregator holding the decryption key.
  • Client drop-outs no longer abort a round provided at least t participants remain online for collaborative decryption.
  • New ML backends or crypto libraries can be swapped in by replacing a single container without rewriting the federation protocol.
  • Per-round key renewal removes the synchronized-decryptor key-recovery attack at negligible cost relative to local training.
  • Communication and crypto overhead stay a small fraction of wall-clock time once local training dominates, as shown on the 679k-parameter Transformer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same container isolation and FSM pattern could be reused to plug in differential privacy or verifiable computation without redesigning the training loop.
  • If non-collusion is later relaxed, the architecture already isolates the crypto provider, so stronger malicious-client defenses could be added as a drop-in service.
  • Because keys are refreshed every round, the design may scale more cleanly to long-lived cross-silo deployments than schemes that reuse a single collective key for months.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper presents MOSAIC-FL, a federated learning framework organized as isolated microservices (Orchestrator, ML Engine, Crypto Provider) communicating over gRPC, coordinated by a finite state machine, and performing secure aggregation with a threshold variant of CKKS (Mouchet et al., 2023) instantiated via Lattigo at 128-bit security (n=2^14, Δ=2^45, 438-bit modulus chain). A t-out-of-N client subset is required for collaborative decryption, giving dropout tolerance. Security claims include IND-CPA-D via noise flooding (Checri et al., 2024) and mitigation of the synchronized-decryptor key-recovery attack (de Verdière et al., 2026) by renewing collective key material every round. Experiments cover a 428k-parameter CNN on EMNIST and a 679k-parameter Transformer for BRCA subtyping on TCGA, with per-round timing breakdowns (Table 2), communication scaling in N and t (Figure 3), and accuracy curves matching the cleartext baseline (Figure 4). The threat model is semi-honest with explicit non-collusion.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a useful systems contribution: to my knowledge among the first deployments of threshold (multi-party) FHE secure aggregation in FL applied to a realistic omics workload (TCGA BRCA subtyping), rather than only MNIST-class benchmarks. Concrete strengths: fully stated cryptographic parameterization (Lattigo CKKS, 128-bit, n=2^14, Δ=2^45); a granular per-round wall-clock breakdown isolating Enc/Dec/Aggregation costs (Table 2); communication-latency scaling across N=4–16 and several thresholds (Figure 3); and explicit engagement with two recent attacks on threshold FHE with stated mitigations rather than assumed security. Accuracy parity with cleartext is shown with per-client variability bands over 100 rounds. The work would be substantially strengthened by release of the framework code, which is not mentioned; the overhead and losslessness claims are empirical and currently rest on a single experimental environment.

major comments (5)
  1. [§4.1, Table 2] The security-critical per-round key renewal is unmeasured and its cost unaccounted. Section 4.1 states that Setup, DistKeyGen, and ShareReshare are re-executed every round to counter the de Verdière et al. attack, and asserts this 'introduces negligible overhead.' Yet Table 2's breakdown (Train/Eval/Enc/Dec/Agg/Sync) contains no key-generation or renewal column. ShareReshare costs O(N²) private ring-element transmissions over the authenticated channels assumed in §4.1. If renewal is folded into 'Sync*' (87.87→92.35s for the Transformer), the reader cannot attribute the ~8s Baseline-vs-ThHE delta. Please add an explicit renewal column, for several (N,t), since this cost scales with N while Enc/Dec do not.
  2. [§4.1, §3.2 DistKeyGen] Related tension: DistKeyGen samples the common randomness a ← R_q 'using common randomness,' and §4.1 says consensus for this randomness was performed 'initially' — once. Per-round renewal requires fresh a each round: either consensus is re-run per round (a distributed-protocol cost that must be measured and included in the renewal overhead above) or a is reused across rounds, which would need justification against the very attack renewal is meant to stop. The manuscript must state which and measure or justify accordingly.
  3. [Abstract/§1 vs §4.1] Claim–evidence mismatch on 'malicious behaviors.' The abstract and §1 claim the FSM 'eventually detects and prevents failures and malicious behaviors,' but §4.1's threat model is strictly semi-honest with an explicit non-collusion hypothesis, and no experiment exercises malicious clients, mid-round dropouts, or any FSM detection event. As written, the FSM's security function is unsubstantiated. Either provide an evaluation (e.g., injected dropout/deviation scenarios) or restrict the claims to synchronization. The collusion of any t clients (or server plus one share-holder) exposing aggregates should also be stated as an explicit limitation.
  4. [§5.3, Figure 4] The 'lossless' claim (§5.3) rests on overlapping curves for a single configuration (N=4, t=3, one seed). There is no numerical final-accuracy table, no multi-seed comparison, and no accuracy data at other (N,t) despite Figure 3 varying them. Since the accuracy-parity claim is central, please report final-round accuracy mean±std over multiple seeds for at least two threshold configurations, and quantify the flooding-noise magnitude relative to the Δ=2^45 / 438-bit precision budget so the parity claim is not curve-visual only.
  5. [§5.3, Figure 3] All experiments run all nodes as containers on one HPC machine (§5.3), so gRPC traffic is loopback: the Figure 3 latencies and Table 2 'Sync*' times do not reflect WAN conditions, yet overhead-minimality is a headline claim ('minor fraction' of 167s). Please either emulate realistic inter-site network conditions (bandwidth/latency shaping) for at least the headline configuration, or state prominently that reported overheads are a lower bound under colocated networking. A mid-round dropout experiment would also substantiate the fault-tolerance claim, which currently has no direct evidence.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.2, §5.3] Notation collision: N denotes both the number of FL clients and the CKKS ring degree (N=2^14) in §5.3. Use distinct symbols (e.g., n_ring or d for the ring dimension).
  2. [Abstract, §1, Table 2] Typos/typesetting: abstract and §1 have 'oft-out-of-Nactive' (missing spaces); 'primordial requirements' is unusual phrasing; Table 2 formatting merges Sync and Total values in places.
  3. [§2, Table 1] Table 1 is a qualitative self-assessment ('Very High (Microservices)') without versions or citations for the compared frameworks; Flower and PySyft capabilities evolve (e.g., SecAgg integrations). Please cite framework versions and soften or substantiate the extensibility rankings. A comparison with the secure-aggregation protocol literature (Bonawitz et al., CCS'17; Bell et al., CCS'20) is also missing and would better position the ThHE choice.
  4. [Figures 3–4] Figure 3 caption says the scaling data is CNN-only; either add the Transformer scaling or justify why CNN suffices. Also clarify in Figure 4 that shaded bands are the standard deviation across clients within one run, not across runs/seeds.
  5. [§4.3] §4.3: FedAvg applies weights n_k/n to Enc(w_k). Clarify whether scaling is done client-side pre-encryption or by clear-ciphertext multiplication server-side, and whether local sample counts n_k are disclosed to the server (a minor privacy consideration worth one sentence).
  6. [§4.3, §5.3] §4.3 says participants 'derive the initial global weights locally from a shared seed' — state how consistency across heterogeneous ML stacks is guaranteed. Also add an artifact-availability statement; code release would materially strengthen reproducibility of Tables 2 and Figure 3.
  7. [§3.2, §4.1, References] Check the de Verdière et al. (2026) reference (ePrint 2026/031) for a peer-reviewed venue if one exists by revision time, and note that PartDec noise e'_j magnitude (the flooding parameter) is never stated numerically.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical systems measurements and externally cited crypto, not self-referential derivation.

full rationale

MOSAIC-FL is an engineering/framework paper. Its load-bearing claims are (i) a microservice + FSM + gRPC architecture, (ii) secure aggregation via the externally cited Mouchet et al. threshold CKKS scheme with stated mitigations (noise flooding; per-round Setup/DistKeyGen/ShareReshare against de Verdière et al.), and (iii) measured accuracy and latency on EMNIST and TCGA BRCA tasks. Accuracy-vs-baseline overlap (Figure 4) and Table 2 timings are external observables under fixed CKKS parameters (N=2^14, Δ=2^45, 128-bit Lattigo settings), not quantities defined to equal a fitted target. Self-citations (Paygambar et al. 2024/2026) only supply the Transformer architecture and genomics task; they do not underwrite uniqueness, force the security argument, or redefine the reported metrics. No self-definitional identity, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness import, or renamed known law appears in the derivation chain. Measurement gaps (e.g., key-renewal cost not broken out in Table 2) are completeness issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Load-bearing structure is mostly inherited cryptography and a standard semi-honest FL threat model, plus engineering parameter choices for CKKS and training. No new physical entities. The central empirical claim depends on those security axioms holding and on CKKS noise being managed by the chosen scaling factor so decryption does not distort FedAvg.

free parameters (5)
  • CKKS scaling factor Δ = 2^45
    Set to 2^45 to keep ThHE training ‘lossless’ relative to baseline; directly controls precision of decrypted aggregates.
  • CKKS polynomial degree n and modulus chain = n=2^14, PQ=438 bits
    n=2^14, PQ=438 bits chosen for 128-bit security in Lattigo batched mode; governs ciphertext size and thus communication overhead.
  • threshold t and cohort size N = primary timing N=4,t=3
    Protocol and latency results are reported for selected (N,t) pairs (e.g. N=4,t=3; N up to 16); availability and collusion tolerance hinge on t.
  • local training hyperparameters = as in §5.1–5.2
    CNN: 2 epochs/round, batch 128, Adam 1e-3; Transformer: 50 local epochs, patience 10, Adam 5e-4, L1/L2 1e-5, 20% dropout—chosen for task performance, not derived.
  • non-IID client allocation target standard deviation
    Genomic client splits follow an unspecified numeric target SD to simulate heterogeneity; affects realism of FL accuracy curves.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Aggregation server is honest-but-curious; at least t of N clients per round are honest-but-curious; participants do not collude.
    Stated explicitly as the security model in §4.1; without it threshold decryption leaks to colluders.
  • domain assumption Mouchet et al. (2023) threshold RLWE/CKKS scheme is correct and the stated IND-CPA-D mitigation (noise flooding + per-round key renewal) blocks the Checri et al. / de Verdière et al. synchronized-decryptor key-recovery attack.
    Security claims in abstract and §4.1 rest on these external results rather than a fresh proof of the composed FL protocol.
  • domain assumption Public authenticated channels exist and clients have already run a consensus protocol to supply DistKeyGen common randomness.
    Required by the ThHE setup (§4.1); out of band relative to the FL round protocol.
  • standard math FedAvg of encrypted updates under CKKS Eval equals (approximately) the cleartext weighted average after CombDec when Δ and noise are as configured.
    Homomorphic correctness of CKKS plus approximate arithmetic; used to justify ‘lossless’ training in §5.3.
  • ad hoc to paper Container-level isolation and pull-only internal APIs prevent direct ML↔crypto side channels inside a node.
    Architectural claim in §4.2 / Figure 1; treated as reducing internal attack surface without a formal isolation proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MOSAIC-FL, a micro-service based privacy-preserving framework with application to genomics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RGDD4K3T

@misc{pith2026260725107,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MOSAIC-FL, a micro-service based privacy-preserving framework with application to genomics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RGDD4K3T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25107}
}
abstract

Security and privacy are primordial requirements for Federated Learning (FL), especially in fields such as healthcare and genomics where sensitive information has to be analyzed. Our FL framework is designed to address these challenges while proposing a modular, flexible and micro-service architecture. More precisely, it integrates an efficient gRPC communication layer and a Finite State Machine to ensure robust component synchronization and threat detection, while relying on a fault-tolerant secure aggregation protocol using a Threshold variant of the CKKS homomorphic cryptosystem. This allows blind model aggregation by an orchestration server, requiring a minimum of $t$-out-of-$N$ active clients for decryption while minimizing communication overhead thanks to both cryptographic and network protocols. We ensure IND-CPA-D security through noise flooding and mitigate the recent key-recovery attack on synchronized decryptors by renewing the collective key material at every round. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness through diverse use cases, ranging from standard image recognition (EMNIST) to complex genomic classification including breast cancer subtyping on TCGA, evaluating system performance across different threshold values and model scales.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25107 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Micro-services architecture of a federated client [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. MOSAIC-FL Secure training round with N = 3 total clients and t = 2 decrypting. 5 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The framework was tested for both image classifica￾tion and cancer subtyping using genomic data. 5.1 CNN-Based Federated Learning on the EMNIST Dataset EMNIST (Cohen et al., 2017) is a dataset composed of 800k 28×28 grayscale images with 62 classes of handwritten letters and digits. The samples are al￾located depend… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Communication overhead per round (CNN model). Comparison between the Baseline (top) and ThHE mode (bottom) for different numbers of clients N and threshold values t. The results highlight the impact of P2P cryptographic synchronization and secure aggregation on total latency. 40GB of VRAM, enabling fast parallelized compu￾tations for deep learning tasks. For this study, the models are implemented using TensorFlow v2… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Accuracy evolution across 100 training rounds for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Hu, P

    Aloufi, A. and Hu, P. (2019). Collaborative Homomorphic Computation on Data Encrypted under Multiple Keys . IWPE

    2019

  2. [2]

    Aloufi, A., Hu, P., Song, Y., and Lauter, K. (2021). Computing blindfolded on data homomorphically encrypted under multiple keys: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , 54(9):1--37

    2021

  3. [3]

    Ananth, P., Jain, A., Jin, Z., and Malavolta, G. (2020). Multi-key fully-homomorphic encryption in the plain model. In TCC , pages 28--57

    2020

  4. [4]

    Asharov, G., Jain, A., López-Alt, A., Tromer, E., Vaikuntanathan, V., and Wichs, D. (2012). Multiparty computation with low communication, computation and interaction via threshold FHE . In EUROCRYPT 2012 , volume 7237, pages 483--501

    2012

  5. [5]

    Benaissa, A., Retiat, B., Cebere, B., and Belfedhal, A. (2021). Tenseal: A library for encrypted tensor operations using homomorphic encryption

    2021

  6. [6]

    Boneh, D. et al. (2018). Threshold cryptosystems from threshold fully homomorphic encryption. In Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO , volume 10991, pages 565--596

    2018

  7. [7]

    Bourse, F., Minelli, M., Minihold, M., and Paillier, P. (2018). Fast homomorphic evaluation of deep discretized neural networks. In Proceedings of CRYPTO 2018 . Springer

    2018

  8. [8]

    Checri, M., Sirdey, R., Boudguiga, A., and Bultel, J.-P. (2024). On the practical cpa ^ D security of ``exact'' and threshold fhe schemes and libraries. In CRYPTO 2024 , pages 3--33

    2024

Show all 299 references
  1. [9]

    Cheon, J., Kim, A., Kim, A., and Song, Y. (2016). Homomorphic encryption for arithmetic of approximate numbers. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2016/421

    2016

  2. [10]

    Chowdhury, S. et al. (2022). Efficient threshold FHE with application to real-time systems. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. , page 1625

    2022

  3. [11]

    Cohen, G., Afshar, S., Tapson, J., and van Schaik, A. (2017). Emnist: an extension of mnist to handwritten letters

    2017

  4. [12]

    P., Makarious, M

    Danek, B. P., Makarious, M. B., Dadu, A., Vitale, D., Suhwan Lee, P., Singleton, A. B., Nalls, M. A., Sun, J., and Faghri, F. (2024). Federated learning for multi-omics: A performance evaluation in parkinson’s disease. Patterns , 5(3):100945

    2024

  5. [13]

    C., Passelègue, A., and Stehlé, D

    de Verdière, F. C., Passelègue, A., and Stehlé, D. (2026). On threshold fully homomorphic encryption with synchronized decryptors. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2026/031

    2026

  6. [14]

    R., Raisaro, J

    Froelicher, D., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. R., Raisaro, J. L., Cuendet, M. A., Sousa, J. S., Cho, H., Berger, B., Fellay, J., and Hubaux, J.-P. (2021). Truly privacy-preserving federated analytics for precision medicine with multiparty homomorphic encryption. Nature Communications...

    2021

  7. [15]

    Gill, A. (1962). Introduction to the Theory of Finite-state Machines . McGraw-Hill, New York

    1962

  8. [16]

    and Kuruppu, D

    Indrasiri, K. and Kuruppu, D. (2020). gRPC: Up and Running . O'Reilly Media. Authoritative source on gRPC architecture and type safety

    2020

  9. [17]

    Jain, A., Rasmussen, P. M. R., and Sahai, A. (2017). Threshold fully homomorphic encryption. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. , page 257

    2017

  10. [18]

    Khanna, A., Schaffer, V., G \"u rsoy, G., and Gerstein, M. (2022). Privacy-preserving model training for disease prediction using Federated Learning with Differential Privacy . In EMBC , pages 1358--1361

    2022

  11. [19]

    Kim, M., Song, Y., and Cheon, J. H. (2017). Secure searching of biomarkers through hybrid homomorphic encryption scheme. BMC Medical Genomics , 10(2):42

    2017

  12. [20]

    Kim, T., Kwak, H., Lee, D., Seo, J., and Song, Y. (2022). Asymptotically faster multi-key homomorphic encryption from homomorphic gadget decomposition. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. , page 347

    2022

  13. [21]

    and Bengio, Y

    LeCun, Y. and Bengio, Y. (1998). Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series , page 255–258. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

    1998

  14. [22]

    McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., and Ag \"u era y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In AISTATS , volume 54, pages 1273--1282. PMLR

    2017

  15. [23]

    Mouchet, C., Bertrand, E., and Hubaux, J. P. (2023). An efficient threshold access-structure for rlwe-based multiparty homomorphic encryption. J. Cryptol. , 36(2)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Mouchet, C., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J., Bossuat, J.-P., and Hubaux, J. P. (2020). Multiparty homomorphic encryption from ring-learning-with-errors. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2020/304

    2020

  17. [25]

    Negoya, Y., Cui, F., Zhang, Z., Pan, M., Ohtsuki, T., and Li, A. (2025). A privacy-preserving federated learning method with homomorphic encryption in omics data

    2025

  18. [26]

    Nguyen, C., Dinh, T., Nguyen, D., Lauter, K., and Kim, M. (2025). Empowering artificial intelligence with homomorphic encryption for secure deep reinforcement learning. Nature Machine Intelligence , 7(12):1913--1926

    2025

  19. [27]

    J., Mziou-Sallami, M., and Meyer, V

    Paygambar, K., Marie, R. J., Mziou-Sallami, M., and Meyer, V. (2026). Subnext: Towards accurate, efficient and robust gene expression classification for breast cancer subtyping. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal , 31:412--421

    2026

  20. [28]

    Paygambar, K., Mziou-Sallami, M., Baligand, F., and Meyer, V. (2024). Federated learning for oncology: Breast cancer subtyping case study using gene expression. In BIBM , pages 4474--4480

    2024

  21. [29]

    N., Collisson, E

    Weinstein, J. N., Collisson, E. A., Mills, G. B., Shaw, K. R. M., Ozenberger, B. A., Ellrott, K., Shmulevich, I., Sander, C., and Stuart, J. M. (2013). The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan - Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet , 45(10):1113--1120

    2013

  22. [30]

    Xiao, Y., Zhang, N., Lou, W., and Hou, Y. T. (2020). A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 22(2):1432–1465

    2020

  23. [31]

    2020 , publisher=

    gRPC: Up and Running , author=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  24. [32]

    1962 , publisher=

    Introduction to the Theory of Finite-state Machines , author=. 1962 , publisher=

    1962

  25. [33]

    2019 , eprint=

    PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  26. [34]

    , author =

    Somewhat Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption. , author =. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  27. [35]

    ACM CCS , year=

    Verifiable delegation of computation on outsourced data , author =. ACM CCS , year=

  28. [36]

    and Costache, A

    Boemer, F. and Costache, A. and Cammarota, R. and Wierzynski, C. , title =. 2019 , series =

    2019

  29. [37]

    2019 , booktitle=

    Low Latency Privacy Preserving Inference , author=. 2019 , booktitle=

    2019

  30. [38]

    Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Fully Masked Neural Networks , booktitle =

    Izabach. Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Fully Masked Neural Networks , booktitle =. 2019 , volume =

    2019

  31. [39]

    and Kusner, M

    Sanyal, A. and Kusner, M. and Gascón, A. and Kanade, V. , year =

  32. [40]

    and Takabi, H

    Hesamifard, E. and Takabi, H. and Ghasemi, M. , title =. 2019 , booktitle =

    2019

  33. [41]

    ACM CCS , pages=

    Efficiently verifiable computation on encrypted data , author=. ACM CCS , pages=

  34. [42]

    , author=

    Reading in the Dark: Classifying Encrypted Digits with Functional Encryption. , author=. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , volume=

  35. [43]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10214 , year=

    Partially encrypted machine learning using functional encryption , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10214 , year=

    1905 arXiv

  36. [44]

    2010 , author=

    MNIST handwritten digit database. 2010 , author=. URL http://yann. lecun. com/exdb/mnist , volume=

    2010

  37. [45]

    Martin Zuber and Dario Fiore , title =

  38. [46]

    Gilad-Bachrach, Ran and Dowlin, Nathan and Laine, Kim and Lauter, Kristin and Naehrig, Michael and Wernsing, John , booktitle=. Crypto

  39. [47]

    Annual Cryptology Conference , pages=

    Non-interactive verifiable computing: Outsourcing computation to untrusted workers , author=. Annual Cryptology Conference , pages=. 2010 , organization=

    2010

  40. [48]

    2017 , month =

    Melissa Chase and Hao Chen and Jintai Ding and Shafi Goldwasser and Sergey Gorbunov and Jeffrey Hoffstein and Kristin Lauter and Satya Lokam and Dustin Moody and Travis Morrison and Amit Sahai and Vinod Vaikuntanathan , title =. 2017 , month =

    2017

  41. [49]

    Pedrouzo-Ulloa and Aymen Boudguiga and Olive Chakraborty and Renaud Sirdey and Oana Stan and Martin Zuber , title=

    A. Pedrouzo-Ulloa and Aymen Boudguiga and Olive Chakraborty and Renaud Sirdey and Oana Stan and Martin Zuber , title=

  42. [50]

    Proceedings of CRYPTO 2018 , Year =

    Fast Homomorphic Evaluation of Deep Discretized Neural Networks , Author =. Proceedings of CRYPTO 2018 , Year =

    2018

  43. [51]

    Herv\'e Chabanne and Amaury de Wargny and Jonathan Milgram and Constance Morel and Emmanuel Prouff , title =

  44. [52]

    Chabanne, Herve and Lescuyer, Roch and Milgram, Jonathan and Morel, Constance and Prouff, Emmanuel , year =

  45. [53]

    IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , year=

    Towards a Practical Clustering Analysis over Encrypted Data , author=. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , year=

  46. [54]

    IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , year=

    Unsupervised Machine Learning on Encrypted Data , author=. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , year=

  47. [55]

    Bergamaschi, Flavio and Halevi, Shai and Halevi, Tzipora and Hunt, Hamish , year =

  48. [56]

    Sergiu Carpov and Nicolas Gama and Mariya Georgieva and Juan Ramon Troncoso-Pastoriza , title =

  49. [57]

    JMIR medical informatics , year=

    Secure Logistic Regression Based on Homomorphic Encryption: Design and Evaluation , author =. JMIR medical informatics , year=

  50. [58]

    Marshall Ball and Brent Carmer and Tal Malkin and Mike Rosulek and Nichole Schimanski , title =

  51. [59]

    Sadegh Riazi and Farinaz Koushanfar , title =

    Bita Darvish Rouhani and M. Sadegh Riazi and Farinaz Koushanfar , title =. CoRR , year =

  52. [60]

    Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Fully Masked Neural Networks

    Izabach \`e ne, Malika and Sirdey, Renaud and Zuber, Martin. Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Fully Masked Neural Networks. Cryptology and Network Security. 2019

    2019

  53. [61]

    Zuber, Martin and Carpov, Sergiu and Sirdey, Renaud , title=

  54. [62]

    and Beal, J

    Chou,E. and Beal, J. and Levy, D. and Yeung, S. and Haque,A. and Fei. Faster CryptoNets: Leveraging Sparsity for Real-World Encrypted Inference , journal =

  55. [63]

    and Lao,Y

    Boemer, F. and Lao,Y. and Wierzynski, C. , title =. CoRR , year =

  56. [64]

    IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , volume=

    Verifynet: Secure and verifiable federated learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  57. [65]

    Journal of the ACM (JACM) , volume=

    Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems , author=. Journal of the ACM (JACM) , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  58. [66]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages=

    Safetynets: Verifiable execution of deep neural networks on an untrusted cloud , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages=

  59. [67]

    Annual Cryptology Conference , pages=

    Time-optimal interactive proofs for circuit evaluation , author=. Annual Cryptology Conference , pages=. 2013 , organization=

    2013

  60. [68]

    , author=

    Embedded Proofs for Verifiable Neural Networks. , author=. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. , volume=

  61. [69]

    2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , pages=

    Pinocchio: Nearly practical verifiable computation , author=. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , pages=. 2013 , organization=

    2013

  62. [70]

    , author=

    vCNN: Verifiable Convolutional Neural Network. , author=. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. , volume=

  63. [71]

    Journal of the ACM (JACM) , volume=

    Delegating computation: interactive proofs for muggles , author=. Journal of the ACM (JACM) , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  64. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06961 , year=

    VeriML: Enabling Integrity Assurances and Fair Payments for Machine Learning as a Service , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06961 , year=

    1909 arXiv

  65. [73]

    27th \ USENIX \ Security Symposium ( \ USENIX \ Security 18) , pages=

    \ GAZELLE \ : A low latency framework for secure neural network inference , author=. 27th \ USENIX \ Security Symposium ( \ USENIX \ Security 18) , pages=

  66. [74]

    European Symposium on Research in Computer Security , pages=

    Efficient proof composition for verifiable computation , author=. European Symposium on Research in Computer Security , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  67. [75]

    Annual international conference on the theory and applications of cryptographic techniques , pages=

    On the size of pairing-based non-interactive arguments , author=. Annual international conference on the theory and applications of cryptographic techniques , pages=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  68. [76]

    ITCS , title =

    Brakerski, Zvika and Gentry, Craig and Vaikuntanathan, Vinod , pages =. ITCS , title =

  69. [77]

    CT-RSA , pages =

    Pascal Aubry and Sergiu Carpov and Renaud Sirdey , title =. CT-RSA , pages =

  70. [78]

    Faster Fully Homomorphic Encryption: Bootstrapping in Less Than 0.1 Seconds , booktitle =

    Ilaria Chillotti and Nicolas Gama and Mariya Georgieva and Malika Izabach. Faster Fully Homomorphic Encryption: Bootstrapping in Less Than 0.1 Seconds , booktitle =

  71. [79]

    Madi and O

    A. Madi and O. Stan and R. Sirdey , title=. Cloud S&P , pages=

  72. [80]

    Conference on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques , pages=

    Secret sharing homomorphisms: Keeping shares of a secret secret , author=. Conference on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques , pages=. 1986 , organization=

    1986

  73. [81]

    Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages =

    Franklin, Matthew and Yung, Moti , title =. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages =. 1992 , isbn =

    1992

  74. [82]

    and Onen, M

    Mansouri, M. and Onen, M. and Ben Jaballah, W. and Conti, M. , title =. PETS , year =

  75. [83]

    and Güler, B

    So, J. and Güler, B. and Avestimehr, A. S. , journal=. Turbo-Aggregate: Breaking the Quadratic Aggregation Barrier in Secure Federated Learning , year=

  76. [84]

    and Pan, M

    Wu, D. and Pan, M. and Xu, Z. and Zhang, Y/ and Han, Z. , booktitle =. Towards Efficient Secure Aggregation for Model Update in Federated Learning , year =

  77. [85]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.11248 , year=

    Fastsecagg: Scalable secure aggregation for privacy-preserving federated learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.11248 , year=

    2009 arXiv

  78. [86]

    2019 , eprint=

    A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  79. [87]

    2021 , publisher=

    Multiparty Homomorphic Encryption from Ring-Learning-with-Errors , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  80. [88]

    and Kim, A

    Cheon, J.H and Kim, A. and Kim, A. and Song, Y/ , title =. 2016 , url =

    2016

  81. [89]

    and Sirdey, R

    Checri, M. and Sirdey, R. and Boudguiga, A. and Bultel, J.-P. On the Practical CPA ^ D Security of ``exact'' and Threshold FHE Schemes and Libraries. CRYPTO 2024. 2024

    2024

  82. [90]

    2021 , eprint=

    TenSEAL: A Library for Encrypted Tensor Operations Using Homomorphic Encryption , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    2021

  83. [91]

    International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques , pages=

    Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes , author=. International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques , pages=. 1999 , organization=

    1999

  84. [92]

    Thomas , year=

    Xiao, Yang and Zhang, Ning and Lou, Wenjing and Hou, Y. Thomas , year=. A Survey of Distributed Consensus Protocols for Blockchain Networks , volume=. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , publisher=. doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2969706 , number=

    2020

  85. [93]

    Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal , author =

    An integrative deep learning framework for classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer , volume =. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.005 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  86. [94]

    Lab Invest , author =

    A convolutional neural network model for survival prediction based on prognosis-related cascaded. Lab Invest , author =. 2022 , pmid =. doi:10.1038/s41374-022-00801-y , abstract =

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    Cancers , author =

    Transformer for. Cancers , author =. doi:10.3390/cancers14194763 , abstract =

    doi

  88. [96]

    2023 , note =

    IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1109/TCBB.2022.3199244 , abstract =

    2023

  89. [97]

    Convolutional neural network for human cancer types prediction by integrating protein interaction networks and omics data , volume =

    Chuang, Yi-Hsuan and Huang, Sing and Hung, Tzu-Mao and Lin, Xiang-Yu and Lee, Jung-Yu and Lai, Wen-Sen and Yang, Jinn-Moon , month = oct, year =. Convolutional neural network for human cancer types prediction by integrating protein interaction networks and omics data , volume ...

    doi

  90. [98]

    A bio‑inspired convolution neural network architecture for automatic breast cancer detection and classification using

    Mohamed, Tehnan and Ezugwu, Absalom and Fonou Dombeu, Jean Vincent and Ikotun, Abiodun and Mohammed, Mohanad , month = sep, year =. A bio‑inspired convolution neural network architecture for automatic breast cancer detection and classification using. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-417...

    doi

  91. [99]

    2023 , keywords =

    Computers in Biology and Medicine , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106812 , abstract =

    2023

  92. [101]

    Lyu, Boyu and Haque, Anamul , year =. Deep. Proceedings of the 2018. doi:10.1145/3233547.3233588 , abstract =

    2018

  93. [102]

    2023 , keywords =

    Expert Systems with Applications , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120047 , abstract =

    2023

  94. [103]

    Bioengineering (Basel) , author =

    Machine. Bioengineering (Basel) , author =. 2023 , pmid =. doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020173 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  95. [104]

    Li, Bao and Liu, Zhenyu and Shao, Lizhi and Qiu, Bensheng and Bu, Hong and Tian, Jie , editor =. Point. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V38I4.28082 , booktitle =

    2024 doi

  96. [105]

    , volume =

    Deep learning techniques for cancer classification using microarray gene expression data. , volume =. Front Physiol , author =. 2022 , pmid =. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.952709 , abstract =

    2022

  97. [106]

    2018 , pages =

    Deep. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621108 , author =

    2018

  98. [107]

    Ahmed, Omar and Brifcani, Adnan , year =. Gene. doi:10.1109/SICN47020.2019.9019357 , booktitle =

    2019

  99. [108]

    Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal , author =

    Genomic pan-cancer classification using image-based deep learning , volume =. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.010 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  100. [109]

    Khalsan, Mahmood and Machado, Lee and Al-Shamery, Eman and Ajit, Suraj and Anthony, Karen and Mu, Mu and Opoku Agyeman, Michael , month = jan, year =. A. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3146312 , journal =

    2022

  101. [110]

    Processes , author =

    A. Processes , author =. doi:10.3390/pr9081466 , abstract =

    doi

  102. [111]

    2023 , pages =

    Osseni, Mazid Abiodoun and Tossou, Prudencio and Laviolette, François and Corbeil, Jacques , editor =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.5220/0011780100003414 , booktitle =

    2023 doi

  103. [112]

    International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology , author =

    Federated learning-based colorectal cancer classification by convolutional neural networks and general visual representation learning , volume =. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology , author =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  104. [113]

    Brendan , year =

    Reddi, Sashank and Charles, Zachary and Zaheer, Manzil and Garrett, Zachary and Rush, Keith and Konečný, Jakub and Kumar, Sanjiv and McMahan, H. Brendan , year =. Adaptive

  105. [114]

    and Ramage, Daniel and Richtárik, Peter , month = oct, year =

    Konečný, Jakub and McMahan, H. and Ramage, Daniel and Richtárik, Peter , month = oct, year =. Federated

  106. [115]

    2018 , pages =

    Effnet:. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451339 , author =

    2018

  107. [116]

    and Mao, H

    Liu, Z. and Mao, H. and Wu, C. and Feichtenhofer, C. and Darrell, T. and Xie, S. , month = jun, year =. A. 2022. doi:10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167 , abstract =

    2022

  108. [117]

    Heo, Hyun-Jun and Shin, Ui-Hyeop and Lee, Ran and Cheon, YoungJu and Park, Hyung-Min , year =

  109. [118]

    Revisiting

    Gorishniy, Yury and Rubachev, Ivan and Khrulkov, Valentin and Babenko, Artem , editor =. Revisiting. Advances in. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  110. [119]

    CoRR , author =

    Learnable. CoRR , author =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  111. [120]

    Learnable

    Li, Yang and Si, Si and Li, Gang and Hsieh, Cho-Jui and Bengio, Samy , editor =. Learnable. Advances in. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  112. [121]

    and Mildenhall, Ben and Fridovich-Keil, Sara and Raghavan, Nithin and Singhal, Utkarsh and Ramamoorthi, Ravi and Barron, Jonathan T

    Tancik, Matthew and Srinivasan, Pratul P. and Mildenhall, Ben and Fridovich-Keil, Sara and Raghavan, Nithin and Singhal, Utkarsh and Ramamoorthi, Ravi and Barron, Jonathan T. and Ng, Ren , editor =. Fourier. Advances in. 2020 , file =

    2020

  113. [122]

    Neural tangent kernel: convergence and generalization in neural networks (invited paper) , url =

    Jacot, Arthur and Gabriel, Franck and Hongler, Clément , editor =. Neural tangent kernel: convergence and generalization in neural networks (invited paper) , url =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3406325.3465355 , booktitle =

    2021

  114. [123]

    CoRR , author =

    On the. CoRR , author =. 2018 , note =

    2018

  115. [124]

    CoRR , author =

    Every. CoRR , author =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  116. [125]

    Zerveas, George and Jayaraman, Srideepika and Patel, Dhaval and Bhamidipaty, Anuradha and Eickhoff, Carsten , year =. A. Proceedings of the 27th. doi:10.1145/3447548.3467401 , abstract =

  117. [126]

    doi:10.1016/J.COMPBIOMED.2023.106643 , journal =

    Gokhale, Madhuri and Mohanty, Sraban Kumar and Ojha, Aparajita , year =. doi:10.1016/J.COMPBIOMED.2023.106643 , journal =

    2023

  118. [127]

    2021 , pages =

    2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , author =. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  119. [128]

    Conditional

    Chu, Xiangxiang and Tian, Zhi and Zhang, Bo and Wang, Xinlong and Shen, Chunhua , year =. Conditional. The

  120. [129]

    2019 , note =

    Scientific Reports , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47765-6 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  121. [130]

    2022 , note =

    Electronics , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3390/electronics11142265 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  122. [131]

    Cao, Wenjie and Zhang, Cheng and Xiong, Zhenzhen and Wang, Ting and Chen, Junchao and Zhang, Bengong , year =. Image. doi:10.23919/CCC52363.2021.9550095 , booktitle =

    2021

  123. [132]

    Applying a

    Babichev, Sergii and Liakh, Igor and Kalinina, Irina , month = oct, year =. Applying a. doi:10.3390/app132111823 , journal =

    doi

  124. [133]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer , volume =. Scientific Reports , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  125. [134]

    Thakur, Tanima and Batra, Isha and Malik, Arun and Ghimire, Deepak and Kim, Seong-heum and Hosen, A. S. M. , month = jan, year =. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3332479 , journal =

    2023

  126. [135]

    Entropy (Basel) , author =

    Prediction of. Entropy (Basel) , author =. 2022 , pmid =. doi:10.3390/e24020141 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  127. [136]

    , volume =

    Recurrent neural network based hybrid model for reconstructing gene regulatory network. , volume =. Comput Biol Chem , author =. 2016 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2016.08.002 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  128. [137]

    Machine Learning with Applications , author =

    Multi-cancer classification. Machine Learning with Applications , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.100468 , abstract =

    2023

  129. [138]

    Oral cancer prediction using gene expression profiling and machine learning , url =

    Shams, Wafaa Kazaal , year =. Oral cancer prediction using gene expression profiling and machine learning , url =

  130. [139]

    Front Cell Dev Biol , author =

    Molecular. Front Cell Dev Biol , author =. 2021 , pmid =. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.687245 , abstract =

    2021

  131. [140]

    JAMA Network Open , author =

    Application of a. JAMA Network Open , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2597 , abstract =

    2019

  132. [141]

    Genome Res , author =

    Systematic learning of gene functional classes from. Genome Res , author =. 2002 , pmid =. doi:10.1101/gr.192502 , abstract =

    2002 doi

  133. [142]

    , volume =

    Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress. , volume =. Fertil Steril , author =. 2018 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.006 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  134. [143]

    Frontiers in Medicine , author =

    Advances and. Frontiers in Medicine , author =. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.911861 , abstract =

    2022

  135. [144]

    , volume =

    Omics, big data and machine learning as tools to propel understanding of biological mechanisms and to discover novel diagnostics and therapeutics. , volume =. Metabolism , author =. 2018 , pmid =. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2018.08.002 , language =

    2018 doi

  136. [145]

    Nat Genet , author =

    The. Nat Genet , author =. 2013 , pmid =

    2013

  137. [146]

    Front Mol Biosci , author =

    Multi-omics analysis:. Front Mol Biosci , author =. 2022 , pmid =. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.962743 , abstract =

    2022

  138. [147]

    , volume =

    Dealing with dimensionality: the application of machine learning to multi-omics data. , volume =. Bioinformatics , author =. 2023 , pmid =. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad021 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  139. [148]

    PeerJ Comput Sci , author =

    Machine learning analysis of. PeerJ Comput Sci , author =. 2021 , pmid =. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.584 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  140. [149]

    ArXiv , author =

    Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? , volume =. ArXiv , author =

  141. [150]

    SN Comput Sci , author =

    Deep. SN Comput Sci , author =. 2021 , pmid =. doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  142. [151]

    CoRR , author =

    Attention. CoRR , author =. 2017 , note =

    2017

  143. [152]

    Expert Systems with Applications , author =

    A comprehensive survey on applications of transformers for deep learning tasks , volume =. Expert Systems with Applications , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122666 , abstract =

    2024

  144. [153]

    Cancers , author =

    The. Cancers , author =. doi:10.3390/cancers16030583 , abstract =

    doi

  145. [154]

    Frontiers in Bioinformatics , author =

    A. Frontiers in Bioinformatics , author =. doi:10.3389/fbinf.2022.927312 , abstract =

    2022

  146. [155]

    SN Computer Science , author =

    Machine. SN Computer Science , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x , abstract =

    2021 doi

  147. [156]

    Sequential

    Platt, John , month = apr, year =. Sequential

  148. [157]

    Neural Networks , author =

    Boosting random subspace method , volume =. Neural Networks , author =. 2008 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2007.12.046 , abstract =

    2008 doi

  149. [158]

    2016 , note =

    CoRR , author =. 2016 , note =

    2016

  150. [159]

    Science , author =

    Reducing the. Science , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.1127647 , abstract =

    2006 doi

  151. [160]

    Applied Computing and Informatics , author =

    Independent component analysis:. Applied Computing and Informatics , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.006 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  152. [161]

    Machine Vision and Applications , author =

    A comparative study of breast cancer tumor classification by classical machine learning methods and deep learning method , volume =. Machine Vision and Applications , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00138-020-01094-1 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  153. [162]

    1901 , note =

    The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , author =. 1901 , note =. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720 , number =

    1901 doi

  154. [163]

    , year =

    MacQueen, J. , year =. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , url =

  155. [164]

    International Journal of Computer Vision , author =

    Distinctive. International Journal of Computer Vision , author =. 2004 , pages =

    2004

  156. [165]

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , author =

    The singular value decomposition:. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , author =. 1980 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TAC.1980.1102314 , number =

    1980

  157. [166]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Benchmarking joint multi-omics dimensionality reduction approaches for the study of cancer , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20430-7 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  158. [167]

    BMC Medical Genomics , author =

    Development and verification of the. BMC Medical Genomics , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s12920-015-0129-6 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  159. [168]

    Ocean Engineering , author =

    Comparison of dimensionality reduction techniques for multi-variable spatiotemporal flow fields , volume =. Ocean Engineering , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116421 , abstract =

    2024

  160. [169]

    Cancers (Basel) , author =

    Performance. Cancers (Basel) , author =. 2021 , pmid =. doi:10.3390/cancers13092013 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  161. [170]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , author =

    Visualizing. Journal of Machine Learning Research , author =. 2008 , note =

    2008

  162. [171]

    The Journal of Machine Learning Research , author =

    Random. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , author =. 2012 , pages =

    2012

  163. [172]

    Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , volume =. J. Mach. Learn. Res. , author =. 2014 , note =

    2014

  164. [173]

    CoRR , author =

    Delving. CoRR , author =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  165. [174]

    CoRR , author =

    Bridging. CoRR , author =. 2016 , note =

    2016

  166. [175]

    CoRR , author =

    Review and. CoRR , author =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  167. [176]

    CoRR , author =

    Normalization. CoRR , author =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  168. [177]

    CoRR , author =

    Batch. CoRR , author =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  169. [178]

    CoRR , author =

    Learning. CoRR , author =. 2019 , note =

    2019

  170. [179]

    , year =

    Ba, Jimmy Lei and Kiros, Jamie Ryan and Hinton, Geoffrey E. , year =. Layer

  171. [180]

    Badola, Akshay and Nair, Vineet Padmanabhan and Lal, Rajendra Prasad , year =. An. doi:10.1109/INDICON49873.2020.9342192 , booktitle =

    2020

  172. [181]

    CoRR , author =

    Descending through a. CoRR , author =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  173. [182]

    CoRR , author =

    An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms , volume =. CoRR , author =. 2016 , note =

    2016

  174. [183]

    CoRR , author =

    Fixing. CoRR , author =. 2017 , note =

    2017

  175. [184]

    and Steiner, Benoit and Tucker, Paul and Vasudevan, Vijay and Warden, Pete and Wicke, Martin and Yu, Yuan and Zheng, Xiaoqiang , year =

    Abadi, Martin and Barham, Paul and Chen, Jianmin and Chen, Zhifeng and Davis, Andy and Dean, Jeffrey and Devin, Matthieu and Ghemawat, Sanjay and Irving, Geoffrey and Isard, Michael and Kudlur, Manjunath and Levenberg, Josh and Monga, Rajat and Moore, Sherry and Murray, Derek ...

  176. [185]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , author =

    Scikit-learn:. Journal of Machine Learning Research , author =

  177. [186]

    2019 , pages =

    Optuna:. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3292500.3330701 , author =

    2019

  178. [187]

    CoRR , author =

    Bayesian. CoRR , author =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  179. [188]

    IEEE Micro , author =

    A. IEEE Micro , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/MM.2018.112130030 , number =

    2018

  180. [189]

    Nature , author =

    Deep learning , volume =. Nature , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature14539 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  181. [190]

    and Epstein, Jonathan A

    Schuler, Gregory D. and Epstein, Jonathan A. and Ohkawa, Hitomi and Kans, Jonathan A. , year =. [10]. Computer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(96)66012-1 , note =

    doi

  182. [191]

    2024 , pages =

    An. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10446337 , author =

    2024

  183. [192]

    CoRR , author =

    Insights into. CoRR , author =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  184. [193]

    Applying the

    Babichev, Sergii and Liakh, Igor and Kalinina, Irina , month = jan, year =. Applying the. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3368070 , journal =

    2024

  185. [194]

    Keles, Feyza Duman and Wijewardena, Pruthuvi Mahesakya and Hegde, Chinmay , year =. On

  186. [195]

    and Li, Shutao , year =

    He, Haibo and Bai, Yang and Garcia, Edwardo A. and Li, Shutao , year =. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2008.4633969 , booktitle =

    2008

  187. [196]

    Chawla, N. V. and Bowyer, K. W. and Hall, L. O. and Kegelmeyer, W. P. , month = jun, year =. doi:10.1613/jair.953 , journal =

    doi

  188. [197]

    Neural Networks , author =

    Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , volume =. Neural Networks , author =. 1989 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 , abstract =

    1989 doi

  189. [198]

    , month = jan, year =

    Lecun, Yann and Bengio, Y. , month = jan, year =. Convolutional. The

  190. [199]

    Hochreiter, Sepp and Schmidhuber, Jürgen , month = dec, year =. Long. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 , journal =

    1997 doi

  191. [200]

    Principles of neurodynamics

    Rosenblatt, Frank , year =. Principles of neurodynamics. perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms , institution =

  192. [201]

    SpringerPlus , author =

    The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets , volume =. SpringerPlus , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2941-7 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  193. [202]

    Genes (Basel) , author =

    Machine. Genes (Basel) , author =. 2019 , pmid =. doi:10.3390/genes10020087 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  194. [203]

    Metrics for

    Grandini, Margherita and Bagli, Enrico and Visani, Giorgio , year =. Metrics for

  195. [204]

    Applied Soft Computing , author =

    Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance , volume =. Applied Soft Computing , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524 , abstract =

    2020

  196. [205]

    V.S, Sumithra and Surendran, Subu , year =. A

  197. [206]

    ArXiv , author =

    Stand-. ArXiv , author =

  198. [207]

    arXiv: Neural and Evolutionary Computing , author =

    Swish: a. arXiv: Neural and Evolutionary Computing , author =

  199. [208]

    CoRR , author =

    An. CoRR , author =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  200. [209]

    2021 , note =

    CoRR , author =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  201. [210]

    CoRR , author =

    Revisiting. CoRR , author =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  202. [211]

    Boser, Bernhard and Guyon, Isabelle and Vapnik, Vladimir , month = aug, year =. A. doi:10.1145/130385.130401 , journal =

  203. [212]

    Random Forests

    Breiman, Leo. Random Forests. Machine Learning

  204. [213]

    u nd \"u z, H \

    G \"u nd \"u z, H \"u seyin Anil and Mreches, Ren \'e and Moosbauer, Julia and Robertson, Gary and To, Xiao-Yin and Franzosa, Eric A and Huttenhower, Curtis and Rezaei, Mina and McHardy, Alice C and Bischl, Bernd and M \"u nch, Philipp C and Binder, Martin. Optimized model arc...

  205. [214]

    Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need , journal =

    Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Amitai Armon , keywords =. Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need , journal =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011 , url =

    2022 doi

  206. [215]

    A comprehensive survey on regularization strategies in machine learning , journal =

    Yingjie Tian and Yuqi Zhang , keywords =. A comprehensive survey on regularization strategies in machine learning , journal =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.005 , url =

    2022 doi

  207. [216]

    Chemosensors , VOLUME =

    Attallah, Omneya , TITLE =. Chemosensors , VOLUME =. 2023 , NUMBER =

    2023

  208. [217]

    2023 , eprint=

    Neural Architecture Search: Insights from 1000 Papers , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  209. [218]

    Anisur Rahman and Swakkhar Shatabda and Md

    Mohaimenul Azam Khan Raiaan and Sadman Sakib and Nur Mohammad Fahad and Abdullah Al Mamun and Md. Anisur Rahman and Swakkhar Shatabda and Md. Saddam Hossain Mukta , keywords =. A systematic review of hyperparameter optimization techniques in Convolutional Neural Networks , jou...

    2024

  210. [219]

    and Moysis, Lazaros and Fragulis, George F

    Manakitsa, Nikoleta and Maraslidis, George S. and Moysis, Lazaros and Fragulis, George F. , TITLE =. Technologies , VOLUME =. 2024 , NUMBER =

    2024

  211. [220]

    Applied Sciences , VOLUME =

    Maurício, José and Domingues, Inês and Bernardino, Jorge , TITLE =. Applied Sciences , VOLUME =. 2023 , NUMBER =

    2023

  212. [221]

    Interchromosomal interactions: A genomic love story of kissing chromosomes , journal =

    Maass, Philipp and Barutcu, Ahmet and Rinn, John , year =. Interchromosomal interactions: A genomic love story of kissing chromosomes , journal =

  213. [222]

    Epistasis --- the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems

    Phillips, Patrick C. Epistasis --- the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Reviews Genetics

  214. [223]

    Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions

    Alzubaidi, Laith and Zhang, Jinglan and Humaidi, Amjad J and Al-Dujaili, Ayad and Duan, Ye and Al-Shamma, Omran and Santamar \' a, J and Fadhel, Mohammed A and Al-Amidie, Muthana and Farhan, Laith. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications,...

  215. [224]

    2023 , eprint=

    A Comprehensive Survey on Applications of Transformers for Deep Learning Tasks , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  216. [225]

    2023 , eprint=

    Scaling MLPs: A Tale of Inductive Bias , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  217. [226]

    A comparative study on the most effective machine learning model for blast loading prediction: From GBDT to Transformer , journal =

    Qilin Li and Yang Wang and Yanda Shao and Ling Li and Hong Hao , keywords =. A comparative study on the most effective machine learning model for blast loading prediction: From GBDT to Transformer , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115310 , url =

    2023

  218. [227]

    Are we ready for a new paradigm shift? A survey on visual deep MLP , journal =

    Ruiyang Liu and Yinghui Li and Linmi Tao and Dun Liang and Hai-Tao Zheng , keywords =. Are we ready for a new paradigm shift? A survey on visual deep MLP , journal =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100520 , url =

    2022

  219. [228]

    2024 , eprint=

    KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  220. [229]

    James Murdoch and Chandan Singh and Karl Kumbier and Reza Abbasi-Asl and Bin Yu , title =

    W. James Murdoch and Chandan Singh and Karl Kumbier and Reza Abbasi-Asl and Bin Yu , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2019 , doi =. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1900654116 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  221. [230]

    Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods‐centric overview with concrete examples , volume =

    Marcinkevics, Ricards and Vogt, Julia , year =. Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods‐centric overview with concrete examples , volume =. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , doi =

  222. [231]

    Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications , journal =

    Jie Zhou and Ganqu Cui and Shengding Hu and Zhengyan Zhang and Cheng Yang and Zhiyuan Liu and Lifeng Wang and Changcheng Li and Maosong Sun , keywords =. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiope...

    2020 doi

  223. [232]

    ACM Comput

    Menghani, Gaurav , title =. ACM Comput. Surv. , month = mar, articleno =. 2023 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3578938 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  224. [233]

    Thompson and Kristjan H

    Neil C. Thompson and Kristjan H. Greenewald and Keeheon Lee and Gabriel F. Manso , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2020 , url =. 2007.05558 , timestamp =

    2020 arXiv

  225. [234]

    2023 , eprint=

    Do Generative Large Language Models need billions of parameters? , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  226. [235]

    Shapeshifter: a Parameter-efficient Transformer using Factorized Reshaped Matrices , url =

    Panahi, Aliakbar and Saeedi, Seyran and Arodz, Tom , booktitle =. Shapeshifter: a Parameter-efficient Transformer using Factorized Reshaped Matrices , url =

  227. [236]

    How important are activation functions in regression and classification? A survey, performance comparison, and future directions , volume =

    Jagtap, Ameya and Karniadakis, George , year =. How important are activation functions in regression and classification? A survey, performance comparison, and future directions , volume =

  228. [237]

    Piotrowski and Jaroslaw J

    Adam P. Piotrowski and Jaroslaw J. Napiorkowski and Agnieszka E. Piotrowska , keywords =. Impact of deep learning-based dropout on shallow neural networks applied to stream temperature modelling , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103076 , url =

    2020

  229. [238]

    Investigating the Impact of Data Normalization Methods on Predicting Electricity Consumption in a Building Using different Artificial Neural Network Models

    Yang-Seon Kim and Moon Keun Kim and Nuodi Fu and Jiying Liu and Junqi Wang and Jelena Srebric , keywords =. Investigating the Impact of Data Normalization Methods on Predicting Electricity Consumption in a Building Using different Artificial Neural Network Models. , journal =....

    2024

  230. [239]

    Briefings in Bioinformatics , volume =

    Eckhart, Lea and Lenhof, Kerstin and Rolli, Lisa-Marie and Lenhof, Hans-Peter , title =. Briefings in Bioinformatics , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1093/bib/bbae242 , url =

    2024 doi

  231. [240]

    A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data , volume =

    Xiang, Ruizhi and Wang, Wencan and Yang, Lei and Wang, Shiyuan and Xu, Chaohan , year =. A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data , volume =. Frontiers in Genetics , doi =

  232. [241]

    Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Data , url=

    Steck, Harald , year=. Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Data , url=. doi:10.1145/3308558.3313710 , booktitle=

  233. [242]

    scIALM: A method for sparse scRNA-seq expression matrix imputation using the Inexact Augmented Lagrange Multiplier with low error , journal =

    Xiaohong Liu and Han Wang and Jingyang Gao , keywords =. scIALM: A method for sparse scRNA-seq expression matrix imputation using the Inexact Augmented Lagrange Multiplier with low error , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.027 , url =

    2024 doi

  234. [243]

    The omics technologies and liquid biopsies: Advantages, limitations, applications , journal =

    Daniele Magro and Marika Venezia and Carmela. The omics technologies and liquid biopsies: Advantages, limitations, applications , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meomic.2024.100039 , url =

    2024

  235. [244]

    Deep learning regularization techniques to genomics data , journal =

    Harouna Soumare and Alia Benkahla and Nabil Gmati , keywords =. Deep learning regularization techniques to genomics data , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2021.100068 , url =

    2021

  236. [245]

    2020 , eprint=

    TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddings , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  237. [246]

    Sparsity regularization enhances gene selection and leukemia subtype classification via logistic regression

    Mahmood, Nozad Hussein and Kadir, Dler Hussein. Sparsity regularization enhances gene selection and leukemia subtype classification via logistic regression. Leuk. Res

  238. [247]

    2024 , eprint=

    A Study of Dropout-Induced Modality Bias on Robustness to Missing Video Frames for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  239. [248]

    2022 , eprint=

    A Systematic Review of Robustness in Deep Learning for Computer Vision: Mind the gap? , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  240. [249]

    Robustness of differential gene expression analysis of RNA-seq

    Stupnikov, A and McInerney, C E and Savage, K I and McIntosh, S A and Emmert-Streib, F and Kennedy, R and Salto-Tellez, M and Prise, K M and McArt, D G. Robustness of differential gene expression analysis of RNA-seq. Comput Struct Biotechnol J

  241. [250]

    2024 , eprint=

    Machine Learning Robustness: A Primer , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  242. [251]

    Alom, Md. Zahangir and Taha, Tarek and Yakopcic, Chris and Westberg, Stefan and Sidike, Paheding and Nasrin, Mst and Hasan, Mahmudul and Van Essen, Brian and Awwal, Abdul and Asari, Vijayan , year =. A State-of-the-Art Survey on Deep Learning Theory and Architectures , volume ...

  243. [252]

    2020 , eprint=

    Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classification , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  244. [253]

    World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews , year=

    Breast Cancer Classification using XGBoost , author=. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews , year=

  245. [254]

    Classification Prediction of Breast Cancer Based on Machine Learning

    Chen, Hua and Wang, Nan and Du, Xueping and Mei, Kehui and Zhou, Yuan and Cai, Guangxing. Classification Prediction of Breast Cancer Based on Machine Learning. Comput Intell Neurosci

  246. [255]

    2024 , eprint=

    When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data? , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  247. [256]

    Diagnostic classification of cancers using extreme gradient boosting algorithm and multi-omics data , journal =

    Baoshan Ma and Fanyu Meng and Ge Yan and Haowen Yan and Bingjie Chai and Fengju Song , keywords =. Diagnostic classification of cancers using extreme gradient boosting algorithm and multi-omics data , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.1037...

    2020

  248. [257]

    The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine

    Berger, Michael F and Mardis, Elaine R. The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol

  249. [258]

    2015 , eprint=

    Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples , author=. 2015 , eprint=

    2015

  250. [259]

    2016 , eprint=

    Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Training , author=. 2016 , eprint=

    2016

  251. [260]

    and Qian, Sharon and Kaplun, Gal and Volf, Verena and Kalimeris, Dimitris , title =

    Koo, Peter K. and Qian, Sharon and Kaplun, Gal and Volf, Verena and Kalimeris, Dimitris , title =. 2019 , doi =. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/06/03/657437.full.pdf , journal =

    2019

  252. [261]

    Evaluating deep learning for predicting epigenomic profiles

    Toneyan, Shushan and Tang, Ziqi and Koo, Peter K. Evaluating deep learning for predicting epigenomic profiles. Nat. Mach. Intell

  253. [262]

    Benchmarking machine learning robustness in Covid-19 genome sequence classification

    Ali, Sarwan and Sahoo, Bikram and Zelikovsky, Alexander and Chen, Pin-Yu and Patterson, Murray. Benchmarking machine learning robustness in Covid-19 genome sequence classification. Sci. Rep

  254. [263]

    2024 , eprint=

    FIMBA: Evaluating the Robustness of AI in Genomics via Feature Importance Adversarial Attacks , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  255. [264]

    Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package

    Tarazona, Sonia and Furi \'o -Tar \' , Pedro and Turr \`a , David and Pietro, Antonio Di and Nueda, Mar \' a Jos \'e and Ferrer, Alberto and Conesa, Ana. Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package. Nucleic Acids Res

  256. [265]

    A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , volume =

    Tenenbaum, Joshua and Silva, Vin and Langford, John , year =. A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , volume =

  257. [266]

    2020 , eprint=

    UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  258. [267]

    2021 , eprint=

    EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    2021

  259. [268]

    and Cogswell, Michael and Das, Abhishek and Vedantam, Ramakrishna and Parikh, Devi and Batra, Dhruv , year=

    Selvaraju, Ramprasaath R. and Cogswell, Michael and Das, Abhishek and Vedantam, Ramakrishna and Parikh, Devi and Batra, Dhruv , year=. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization , volume=. International Journal of Computer Vision , publish...

    doi

  260. [269]

    Exploring local interpretability in dimensionality reduction: Analysis and use cases , journal =

    Nikolaos Mylonas and Ioannis Mollas and Nick Bassiliades and Grigorios Tsoumakas , keywords =. Exploring local interpretability in dimensionality reduction: Analysis and use cases , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124074 , url =

    2024

  261. [270]

    Is Attention Explanation? An Introduction to the Debate

    Bibal, Adrien and Cardon, R \'e mi and Alfter, David and Wilkens, Rodrigo and Wang, Xiaoou and Fran c ois, Thomas and Watrin, Patrick. Is Attention Explanation? An Introduction to the Debate. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguisti...

    2022 doi

  262. [271]

    2024 , eprint=

    Explainable AI Methods for Multi-Omics Analysis: A Survey , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  263. [272]

    2017 , eprint=

    A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions , author=. 2017 , eprint=

    2017

  264. [273]

    Why Should I Trust You?

    "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier , author=. 2016 , eprint=

    2016

  265. [274]

    Interpretation and visualization techniques for deep learning models in medical imaging

    Huff, Daniel T and Weisman, Amy J and Jeraj, Robert. Interpretation and visualization techniques for deep learning models in medical imaging. Phys. Med. Biol

  266. [275]

    Approximating XGBoost with an interpretable decision tree , journal =

    Omer Sagi and Lior Rokach , keywords =. Approximating XGBoost with an interpretable decision tree , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.055 , url =

    2021 doi

  267. [276]

    XGBoost , A Novel Explainable AI Technique, in the Prediction of Myocardial Infarction: A UK Biobank Cohort Study

    Moore, Alexander and Bell, Max. XGBoost , A Novel Explainable AI Technique, in the Prediction of Myocardial Infarction: A UK Biobank Cohort Study. Clin Med Insights Cardiol

  268. [277]

    Briefings in Bioinformatics , volume =

    Sharma, Alok and Lysenko, Artem and Boroevich, Keith A and Vans, Edwin and Tsunoda, Tatsuhiko , title =. Briefings in Bioinformatics , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/bib/bbab297 , url =

    2021 doi

  269. [278]

    and Tsunoda, Tatsuhiko , title=

    Sharma, Alok and Lysenko, Artem and Boroevich, Keith A. and Tsunoda, Tatsuhiko , title=. Scientific Reports , year=. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29644-3 , url=

    doi

  270. [279]

    and Wasserman, Wyeth W

    Novakovsky, Gherman and Dexter, Nick and Libbrecht, Maxwell W. and Wasserman, Wyeth W. and Mostafavi, Sara , title=. Nature Reviews Genetics , year=. doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00532-2 , url=

    doi

  271. [280]

    S. S. Shapiro and M. B. Wilk , journal =. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , urldate =

  272. [281]

    The Probable Error of a Mean , urldate =

    Student , journal =. The Probable Error of a Mean , urldate =

  273. [282]

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , year=

    SOME RAPID APPROXIMATE STATISTICAL PROCEDURES , author=. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , year=

  274. [283]

    Robust Tests for Equality of Variance , volume =

    Levene, Howard , year =. Robust Tests for Equality of Variance , volume =

  275. [284]

    An Empirical Study on the Correlation between Early Stopping Patience and Epochs in Deep Learning , volume =

    Hussein, Bootan and Shareef, Shareef , year =. An Empirical Study on the Correlation between Early Stopping Patience and Epochs in Deep Learning , volume =. ITM Web of Conferences , doi =

  276. [285]

    Aridas , title =

    Guillaume Lemaitre and Fernando Nogueira and Christos K. Aridas , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2016 , url =. 1609.06570 , biburl =

    2016 arXiv

  277. [286]

    Fisher,R. A. , title =. 1934 , pages =

    1934

  278. [287]

    , title =

    Smyth, Gordon K. , title =. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology , year =

  279. [288]

    and Phipson, Belinda and Wu, Di and Hu, Yifang and Law, Charity W

    Ritchie, Matthew E. and Phipson, Belinda and Wu, Di and Hu, Yifang and Law, Charity W. and Shi, Wei and Smyth, Gordon K. , title =. Nucleic Acids Research , year =

  280. [289]

    Bioinformatics , volume =

    Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis , author =. Bioinformatics , volume =

  281. [290]

    Nature , volume =

    The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , author =. Nature , volume =

  282. [291]

    NPJ Systems Biology and Applications , volume =

    iOmicsPASS: network-based integration of multiomics data for predictive subnetwork discovery , author =. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications , volume =

  283. [292]

    Bioinformatics , volume =

    SALMON: Survival analysis learning with multi-omics neural networks on breast cancer , author =. Bioinformatics , volume =

  284. [293]

    Nature Methods , volume =

    Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale , author =. Nature Methods , volume =

  285. [294]

    Bioinformatics , volume =

    NEMO: cancer subtyping by integration of partial multi-omic data , author =. Bioinformatics , volume =

  286. [295]

    Bioinformatics , volume =

    Multi-omic modularity detection in cancer , author =. Bioinformatics , volume =

  287. [296]

    Bioinformatics , volume =

    Inference of patient-specific pathway activities from multi-dimensional cancer genomics data using PARADIGM , author =. Bioinformatics , volume =

  288. [297]

    IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics , volume =

    A comparison of methods for clustering cancer multi-omics data , author =. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics , volume =

  289. [298]

    Annals of Applied Statistics , volume =

    Joint and individual variation explained (JIVE) for integrated analysis of multiple data types , author =. Annals of Applied Statistics , volume =

  290. [299]

    AI Open , volume=

    A Survey of Transformers , author=. AI Open , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  291. [300]

    Paygambar and R

    K. Paygambar and R. Jean Marie and M. Mziou-Sallami and V. Meyer , keywords =. SubNExT: Towards accurate, efficient and robust gene expression classification for breast cancer subtyping , journal =. 2026 , issn =

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.