Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Magnetic reconnection can extract rotational energy from a non-Kerr spacetime with an anomalous quadrupole moment, and a small positive quadrupole gives the highest power and efficiency.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 02:46 UTC pith:OKOJKNSF

load-bearing objection Standard Comisso-Asenjo extension to a horizonless spacetime with CTCs, undercut by an unmodeled absorbing surface. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25315 v1 pith:OKOJKNSF submitted 2026-07-28 gr-qc

Extracting Energy from a Non-Kerr Rotating Spacetime with an Anomalous Quadrupole Moment via Magnetic Reconnection

Ke Wang , Xiao-Xiong Zeng This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords magnetic reconnectionComisso-Asenjo mechanismQuevedo-Mashhoon spacetimeanomalous quadrupole momentnaked singularityclosed timelike curvesenergy extractionergosphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using the Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection mechanism, the paper asks whether rotational energy can be harvested from the Quevedo-Mashhoon spacetime, a rotating, axisymmetric solution with an arbitrary anomalous quadrupole moment that harbors a naked singularity and closed timelike curves. The authors show that after excising the closed-timelike-curve region by placing a compact-object surface just outside it, accelerated plasma outflows carry more energy to infinity while decelerated inflows have negative energy, the two conditions needed for extraction. They find that energy extraction is possible for both positive and negative anomalous quadrupole moments, but a small positive moment yields the highest power and efficiency, in some parameter ranges exceeding the Kerr result. The relevance is that the mechanism survives, and can even be enhanced by, deviations from Kerr that are not yet excluded by observations.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection process extracts rotational energy from the Quevedo-Mashhoon spacetime for both signs of the anomalous quadrupole moment Q, provided the closed-timelike-curve region is excised by a compact-object surface at r_s = r_c(1+10^-3). In the equatorial plane, the energy per unit enthalpy of the accelerated branch remains positive while the decelerated branch becomes negative for sufficiently large magnetization, so the energy-extraction conditions are met. Scanning reconnection radius, spin, magnetization, and field orientation angle, the authors find that extraction power and efficiency peak at a small positive Q; at a=0.96 efficie

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Comisso-Asenjo formula for the energy per unit enthalpy at infinity of the reconnected plasma branches, ε_±, evaluated in the zero-angular-momentum-observer frame for a Keplerian equatorial current sheet; energy extraction requires ε_- < 0 and ε_+ > 0. Around it stand three geometric ingredients: the ergosphere boundary g_tt=0, the closed-timelike-curve boundary g_φφ<0, and the excising surface r_s = r_c(1+10^-3), which hides the unphysical regions so that the reconnection radius lies in the physically meaningful exterior. The paper then computes the power P = -ε_- A_in U_in with A_in ≈ r_E^2 - r_s^2 and the efficiency η = ε_+/(ε_+ + ε_-) as functions of Q, spi

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that hiding the naked singularity and closed timelike curves behind a compact-object surface at r_s=r_c(1+10^-3) leaves the reconnection energetics unchanged, even though the surface is a geometric cut-off rather than a derived boundary condition.

What would settle it

A direct check would be to run the full Comisso-Asenjo calculation without the excising cut-off, allowing reconnection radii inside r_c, and see whether ε_- remains negative and the power stays finite; if removing the cut-off reverses or diverges the extraction power, the excision is doing the work. Observationally, a measurement of a candidate compact object with small positive quadrupole showing no reconnection-driven flare excess over Kerr would contradict the predicted quadrupole window.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Comisso-Asenjo mechanism does not require a true event horizon or a causally well-behaved exterior; it can draw energy from a horizonless rotating spacetime once the causal-violating region is excised.
  • A small positive anomalous quadrupole moment can raise both the allowed extraction region and the power and efficiency above Kerr values, so non-Kerr deviations need not degrade energy extraction.
  • Extraction is optimized by large plasma magnetization, small field orientation angle, and a moderate reconnection radius; these levers act on ε_- by making the decelerated branch more negative.
  • Energy extraction remains possible for negative quadrupole moments, but with power and efficiency monotonically below Kerr as |Q| grows.
  • Higher spin strengthens the effect: at a=0.98 the efficiency exceeds Kerr up to Q≈45.5, giving a wider Kerr-beating window than at a=0.96.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An unstated consequence is that if the excision is meant to mimic a real compact-object surface, the next step is to replace the geometric cutoff with a matter model and ask whether the inferred power survives; the predicted quadrupole window would only be robust if the boundary does not absorb the outgoing accelerated branch.
  • The result suggests a testable observational route: a candidate non-Kerr compact object with a small positive quadrupole should show magnetic-reconnection luminosity above the Kerr prediction, a signal that could be sought in flare or jet power measurements.
  • Because the optimal quadrupole is small but nonzero, extraction efficiency is not monotonic in deviation from Kerr; this hints that other multipole deformations may also have an extremum, and scanning beyond Q is a natural numerical extension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Comisso–Asenjo magnetic-reconnection energy-extraction mechanism to the Quevedo–Mashhoon rotating spacetime with an anomalous quadrupole moment Q. After summarizing the metric and its ergosphere/closed-timelike-curve structure, the authors adopt the ZAMO-frame expression for ε_± from Ref. [20], compute the allowed energy-extraction region, and scan the power and efficiency as functions of Q, a, σ, ξ, and r. They conclude that energy extraction is possible for both signs of Q, but a small positive Q gives higher power and efficiency than Kerr.

Significance. If correct, this would extend the magnetic-reconnection extraction mechanism to a horizonless spacetime with closed timelike curves and a naked singularity, and would identify an optimal quadrupole deformation. The paper is clearly written and contains a systematic parameter exploration, with useful comparison to the Kerr limit. However, the physical interpretation is not yet established: the negative-energy plasma must be captured by an ad hoc compact surface, and the surface radius is not defined for the Q range used in the central comparison. These issues are load-bearing for the main claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, after Fig. 2] The compact surface at r_s = r_c(1+10^-3) is introduced to hide the CTC region, but the paper does not establish that this surface absorbs the decelerated negative-energy plasma. In the standard Comisso–Asenjo mechanism the negative-energy branch is swallowed by an event horizon; without a horizon, a reflecting or scattering surface would not yield net energy extraction even when ε_- < 0. The authors should derive or at least physically motivate the absorbing nature of this surface before using the mechanism.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (20) and Figs. 7–8] The power formula uses A_in ≈ r_E^2 - r_s^2. Since r_s is defined only when a closed timelike curve exists, and the text itself states that for small |Q| CTCs do not exist, the values of r_s used for Q=0 and small |Q| are undefined. The comparison of P and η across Q, which underlies the main conclusion, is therefore ambiguous. Please define r_s for all Q (e.g., via a limiting/would-be horizon) or restrict the claim to cases with CTCs.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (18)] The expression for ε_± is taken from Ref. [20] without derivation or an explicit check that its derivation carries over to the Quevedo–Mashhoon metric. As printed, the formula also appears typographically garbled (misplaced braces and incomplete terms). Since the entire parameter scan uses this equation, the authors should either reproduce the derivation for this metric or clearly state the exact expression used.
  4. [Section II, below Eq. (10)] The statement that 'when a=M, the metric becomes the extreme Kerr spacetime regardless of the value of Q' is non-obvious because k = sqrt(M^2 - a^2) vanishes and the coordinate transformation becomes singular. Please provide the limit explicitly or soften the claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The word 'event horizon' should be 'hypothetical event horizon' or 'would-be horizon' for Q≠0, since no true horizon exists.
  2. [Eq. (18)] The typesetting of the nested braces and square roots makes the formula hard to read; please re-typeset it.
  3. [Fig. 1] In panels (f)–(h), clarify whether the r_C curve is absent because no CTC exists or because it is outside the plotted range.
  4. [Section IV] Please specify the units/dimensions of the 'power per unit enthalpy density' P, and note that A_in is a rough estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central result is an external-formula parameter scan; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that a positive and small anomalous quadrupole moment yields higher magnetic-reconnection energy extraction power and efficiency in the Quevedo–Mashhoon spacetime — is obtained by substituting the Quevedo–Mashhoon metric into the Comisso–Asenjo energy-extraction formula, Eq. (18), which is quoted from the external Ref. [20]. The power and efficiency formulas, Eqs. (20) and (21), also come from Ref. [20]. No parameter is fitted to reproduce the claimed peak in Q; the conclusion follows from a numerical scan of an externally supplied formula over the spacetime parameter Q. The metric itself is taken from external Refs. [62–65], and the formula for Keplerian angular velocity is from Ref. [72]. Self-citations (Refs. [45], [47], [49], [79]–[82]) are prior applications or extensions by the same authors, but none is used as a load-bearing input in the derivation. The weakest point is the ad hoc compact-object surface r_s = r_c(1+10^-3), introduced to exclude closed timelike curves; this is a physical modeling assumption and a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. It does not define ε_-, P, or η in terms of the conclusion. Accordingly, no specific equation is equivalent by construction to the claimed result, and the central prediction is not forced by self-citation or by fitting. The score of 2 reflects minor self-citation and borrowed background assumptions, not actual circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the arbitrary quadrupole parameter Q, hand-chosen spin/magnetization/orientation/radius parameters, an ad hoc compact-object cutoff, and an imported plasma formula. There are no fitted constants in the target-result sense, but several parameters are chosen by hand and affect the quantitative conclusion.

free parameters (5)
  • Q (anomalous quadrupole moment)
    Metric parameter scanned from -30 to 50; the central result is that small positive Q maximizes power and efficiency.
  • a (spin) = 0.95-1.0
    Spin values chosen for figures (e.g., a=0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98); results depend strongly on spin.
  • r_s = r_c(1 + 10^-3)
    Hand-chosen compact-object radius used to exclude CTC regions; enters power through A_in ≈ r_E^2 - r_s^2.
  • U_in ≈ 0.1 = 0.1
    Collisionless inflow speed taken from Ref. [76], not measured; linearly scales the power estimate.
  • σ, ξ, r = e.g., σ=100, ξ=π/12, r=1.6
    Plasma magnetization, magnetic-field orientation angle, and reconnection radius are chosen per figure; central results depend on them.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Quevedo-Mashhoon metric (Eqs. 1-10) is an exact stationary, axisymmetric, asymptotically flat vacuum solution of Einstein's equations with an arbitrary quadrupole moment.
    Taken from Refs. [62, 63, 70]; not re-derived in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The naked singularity and closed timelike curve regions can be excised by postulating a compact-object surface at r_s = r_c(1 + 10^-3).
    Explicitly an ad hoc procedure borrowed from superspinar treatments [74, 75]; the physical validity for the QM spacetime is assumed.
  • domain assumption The Comisso-Asenjo formula (Eq. 18) for ε± applies without modification in this horizonless, CTC-containing spacetime.
    Imported from Ref. [20]; no derivation or validity check is provided for the QM background.
  • domain assumption The plasma is a single-fluid, adiabatic, incompressible, relativistically hot fluid with ω0 = 4p.
    Standard Comisso-Asenjo assumptions, stated in Section III but not justified for this spacetime.
  • domain assumption The current sheet moves on prograde Keplerian circular orbits described by Eq. (12).
    Used to locate the reconnection region; from Ref. [72], with only prograde orbits considered.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13113 in / 11515 out tokens · 109044 ms · 2026-08-01T02:46:41.032011+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates how to extract energy from a non-Kerr rotating spacetime with an anomalous quadrupole moment via the magnetic reconnection mechanism. Unlike many other rotating spacetimes, this spacetime possesses closed timelike curves, and the corresponding spacetime regions must be excluded when extracting energy. After introducing the event horizon, ergosphere, and closed timelike curves of this spacetime, we deeply analyze the energy per unit enthalpy at infinity for accelerated and decelerated plasmas, the allowed region for energy extraction, and the power and efficiency of energy extraction. The results show that energy extraction is possible for both positive and negative anomalous quadrupole moments, but a positive and small anomalous quadrupole moment corresponds to higher power and efficiency of energy extraction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25315 by Ke Wang, Xiao-Xiong Zeng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Variation of the event horizon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Allowed region for energy extraction in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Allowed region for energy extraction in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Left panel: Variation of the energy extraction power with the reconnection radius for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Variation of the energy extraction power with the anomalous quadrupole moment, left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Variation of the energy extraction efficiency with the anomalous quadrupole moment, left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.6, 061102

    2016

  2. [2]

    WhenQ= 0, the metric reduces to the Kerr metric; whena= 0, the metric reduces to the Erez-Rosen metric [71]

    + 1 2 (x2 −1)(2Q 2 2 −3xQ 1Q2 + 3Q0Q2 − dQ2 dx ) , (6) a± =x h 1−α 2e2Q(δ++δ−) i ± h 1 +α 2e2Q(δ++δ−) i ,(7) b± =αy e2Qδ+ +e 2Qδ− ∓α e2Qδ+ −e 2Qδ− ,(8) δ± = 1 2 ln (x±y) 2 x2 −1 + 3 2 1−y 2 ∓xy + 3 4 x 1−y 2 ∓y x2 −1 ln x−1 x+ 1 ,(9) x= r−M k , y= cosθ.(10) 5 Here,P m(y)andQ m(x)are the Legendre polynomials of the first and second kind of orderm, respecti...

  3. [3]

    Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914,

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.24, 241102

    2016

  4. [4]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019), L1

    2019

  5. [5]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 930(2022) no.2, L12

    2022

  6. [6]

    A Measurement of the electromagnetic luminosity of a Kerr black hole,

    J. C. McKinney and C. F. Gammie, “A Measurement of the electromagnetic luminosity of a Kerr black hole,” Astrophys. J.611(2004), 977-995

    2004

  7. [7]

    Meissner effect and Blandford-Znajek mechanism in conductive 14 black hole magnetospheres,

    S. S. Komissarov and J. C. McKinney, “Meissner effect and Blandford-Znajek mechanism in conductive 14 black hole magnetospheres,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.377(2007), L49-L53

    2007

  8. [8]

    The Blandford-Znajek process as a central engine for a gamma-ray burst,

    H. K. Lee, R. A. M. J. Wijers and G. E. Brown, “The Blandford-Znajek process as a central engine for a gamma-ray burst,” Phys. Rept.325(2000), 83-114

    2000

  9. [9]

    Simulations of Ultrarelativistic Magnetodynamic Jets from Gamma-ray Burst Engines,

    A. Tchekhovskoy, J. C. McKinney and R. Narayan, “Simulations of Ultrarelativistic Magnetodynamic Jets from Gamma-ray Burst Engines,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.388(2008), 551

    2008

  10. [10]

    Ultraluminous x-ray sources in external galaxies,

    A. R. King, M. B. Davies, M. J. Ward, G. Fabbiano and M. Elvis, “Ultraluminous x-ray sources in external galaxies,” Astrophys. J. Lett.552(2001), L109

    2001

  11. [11]

    Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969), 252-276

    1969

  12. [12]

    Energy Limits on the Penrose Process,

    R. M. Wald, “Energy Limits on the Penrose Process,” Astrophys. J.191(1974), 231

    1974

  13. [13]

    Energy-extraction processes from a kerr black hole immersed in a magnetic field. ii. the formalism,

    S. V. Dhurandhar, “Energy-extraction processes from a kerr black hole immersed in a magnetic field. ii. the formalism,” Phys. Rev. D30(1984) no.8, 1625-1631

    1984

  14. [14]

    High efficiency of the penrose mechanism for particle collisions,

    T. Piran, J. Shaham and J. Katz, “High efficiency of the penrose mechanism for particle collisions,” Astrophys. J. Lett.196(1975), L107

    1975

  15. [15]

    Perturbations of a rotating black hole. III - Interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation,

    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press, “Perturbations of a rotating black hole. III - Interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation,” Astrophys. J.193(1974), 443-461

    1974

  16. [16]

    Electromagnetic extractions of energy from Kerr black holes,

    R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, “Electromagnetic extractions of energy from Kerr black holes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.179(1977), 433-456

    1977

  17. [17]

    Magnetohydrodynamic Flows in Kerr Ge- ometry: Energy Extraction from Black Holes,

    M. Takahashi, S. Nitta, Y. Tatematsu and A. Tomimatsu, “Magnetohydrodynamic Flows in Kerr Ge- ometry: Energy Extraction from Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.363(1990), 206

    1990

  18. [18]

    Kerr Black Holes as Particle Accelerators to Arbitrarily High Energy,

    M. Banados, J. Silk and S. M. West, “Kerr Black Holes as Particle Accelerators to Arbitrarily High Energy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009), 111102

    2009

  19. [19]

    Quantum Schwarzschild geometry in effective field theory models of gravity,

    E. Battista, “Quantum Schwarzschild geometry in effective field theory models of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.2, 026004

    2024

  20. [20]

    The transformation of the rotational energy of a Kerr black hole,

    S. R. Zhang and M. Prakapenia, “The transformation of the rotational energy of a Kerr black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) no.13, 135019

    2024

  21. [21]

    Magnetic Reconnection as a Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Rotating Black Holes,

    L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, “Magnetic Reconnection as a Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Rotating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.2, 023014

    2021

  22. [22]

    Observations of the Blandford-Znajek and the MHD Penrose processes in computer simulations of black hole magnetospheres,

    S. S. Komissarov, “Observations of the Blandford-Znajek and the MHD Penrose processes in computer simulations of black hole magnetospheres,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.359(2005), 801-808

    2005

  23. [23]

    Magnetosphere of a spinning black hole and the role of the current sheet,

    W. E. East and H. Yang, “Magnetosphere of a spinning black hole and the role of the current sheet,” Phys. Rev. D98(2018) no.2, 023008

    2018

  24. [24]

    First-Principles Plasma Simulations of Black-Hole Jet Launch- ing,

    K. Parfrey, A. Philippov and B. Cerutti, “First-Principles Plasma Simulations of Black-Hole Jet Launch- ing,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) no.3, 035101

    2019

  25. [25]

    General Theory of the Plasmoid Insta- bility,

    L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y. M. Huang and A. Bhattacharjee, “General Theory of the Plasmoid Insta- bility,” Phys. Plasmas23(2016), 100702

    2016

  26. [26]

    Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets,

    L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y. M. Huang and A. Bhattacharjee, “Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets,” Astrophys. J.850(2017) no.2, 142 15

    2017

  27. [27]

    Transition from collisional to kinetic regimes in large-scale reconnection layers,

    W. Daughton, V. Roytershteyn, B. J. Albright, H. Karimabadi, L. Yin, and K. J. Bowers, “Transition from collisional to kinetic regimes in large-scale reconnection layers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) no. 6, 065004

    2009

  28. [28]

    Fast reconnection in high-lundquist-number plasmas due to secondary tearing instabilities,

    A. Bhattacharjee, Y. M. Huang, H. Yang, and B. Rogers, “Fast reconnection in high-lundquist-number plasmas due to secondary tearing instabilities,” Phys. Plasma16(2009) no. 11, 112102

    2009

  29. [29]

    Energy Extraction via Magnetic Reconnection in the Ergosphere of a Rotating Non-Kerr Black Hole,

    W. Liu, “Energy Extraction via Magnetic Reconnection in the Ergosphere of a Rotating Non-Kerr Black Hole,” Astrophys. J.925(2022) no.2, 149

    2022

  30. [30]

    Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a spinning black hole with broken Lorentz symmetry,

    M. Khodadi, “Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a spinning black hole with broken Lorentz symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.2, 023025

    2022

  31. [31]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Lorentz breaking Kerr–Sen and Kiselev black holes,

    A. Carleo, G. Lambiase and L. Mastrototaro, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Lorentz breaking Kerr–Sen and Kiselev black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.9, 776

    2022

  32. [32]

    Extracting energy via magnetic reconnection from Kerr–de Sitter black holes,

    C. H. Wang, C. Q. Pang and S. W. Wei, “Extracting energy via magnetic reconnection from Kerr–de Sitter black holes,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.12, 124050

    2022

  33. [33]

    Energy extraction from rotating regular black hole via Comisso-Asenjo mechanism,

    Z. Li, X. K. Guo and F. Yuan, “Energy extraction from rotating regular black hole via Comisso-Asenjo mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.4, 044067

    2023

  34. [34]

    Energy extraction via Comisso-Asenjo mechanism from rotating hairy black hole,

    Z. Li and F. Yuan, “Energy extraction via Comisso-Asenjo mechanism from rotating hairy black hole,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024039

    2023

  35. [35]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Konoplya-Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized black holes,

    S. J. Zhang, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Konoplya-Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized black holes,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.8, 084066

    2024

  36. [36]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in magnetized black holes,

    S. J. Zhang, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in magnetized black holes,” JCAP07(2024), 042

    2024

  37. [37]

    Harvesting energy driven by Comisso-Asenjo process from Kerr-MOG black holes,

    M. Khodadi, D. F. Mota and A. Sheykhi, “Harvesting energy driven by Comisso-Asenjo process from Kerr-MOG black holes,” JCAP10(2023), 034

    2023

  38. [38]

    Kerr-Newman-modified-gravity black hole’s impact on the magnetic reconnection,

    S. Shaymatov, M. Alloqulov, B. Ahmedov and A. Wang, “Kerr-Newman-modified-gravity black hole’s impact on the magnetic reconnection,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.4, 044005

    2024

  39. [39]

    Energy extraction through magnetic reconnection from a Kerr–Newman black hole in perfect fluid dark matter,

    S. Rodriguez, A. Sidler, L. Rodriguez and L. R. Ram-Mohan, “Energy extraction through magnetic reconnection from a Kerr–Newman black hole in perfect fluid dark matter,” Phys. Dark Univ.48 (2025), 101961

    2025

  40. [40]

    Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a Kono- plya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole,

    F. Long, S. Wang, S. Chen and J. Jing, “Magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from a Kono- plya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.1, 26

    2025

  41. [41]

    Extracting spinning wormhole energy via Comisso-Asenjo process,

    X. Ye, C. H. Wang and S. W. Wei, “Extracting spinning wormhole energy via Comisso-Asenjo process,” JCAP12(2023), 030

    2023

  42. [42]

    Effects of tidal charge on magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from spinning braneworld black hole,

    S. W. Wei, H. M. Wang, Y. P. Zhang and Y. X. Liu, “Effects of tidal charge on magnetic reconnection and energy extraction from spinning braneworld black hole,” JCAP04(2022) no.04, 050

    2022

  43. [43]

    Enhanced energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Kerr- AdS spacetime*,

    B. Zhao, C. H. Wang and S. W. Wei, “Enhanced energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Kerr- AdS spacetime*,” Chin. Phys. C50(2026) no.5, 055102

    2026

  44. [44]

    EnergyextractionfromaKerrblackholeviamagneticreconnection 16 within the plunging region,

    B.Chen, Y.Hou, J.LiandY.Shen, “EnergyextractionfromaKerrblackholeviamagneticreconnection 16 within the plunging region,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.6, 063003

    2024

  45. [45]

    Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: The plunging bulk plasma and orientation angle,

    Y. Shen, H. Y. YuChih and B. Chen, “Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: The plunging bulk plasma and orientation angle,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.12, 123010

    2024

  46. [46]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole: Circular plasma and plunging plasma,

    X. X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole: Circular plasma and plunging plasma,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.6, 064080

    2025

  47. [47]

    Extracting energy from plunging region of a Kerr-Taub-NUT black hole by magnetic reconnection,

    Z. Cheng, S. Chen and J. Jing, “Extracting energy from plunging region of a Kerr-Taub-NUT black hole by magnetic reconnection,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.10, 1130

    2025

  48. [48]

    Energy extraction from the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole via magnetic reconnection in a circular and a plunging plasma,

    X. X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Energy extraction from the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole via magnetic reconnection in a circular and a plunging plasma,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.6, 064032

    2025

  49. [49]

    Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Bumblebee gravity,

    H. Y. YuChih and Y. Shen, “Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.10, 104016

    2025

  50. [50]

    Energy extraction from the accelerating Kerr black hole via magnetic reconnection in the plunging region and circular orbit region,

    K. Wang and X. X. Zeng, “Energy extraction from the accelerating Kerr black hole via magnetic reconnection in the plunging region and circular orbit region,” JCAP11(2025), 026

    2025

  51. [51]

    Energy Extraction from Rotating Charged Black Holes in Kalb-Ramond Gravity,

    J. T. Yao, K. J. He, Z. C. Lin and H. Yu, “Energy Extraction from Rotating Charged Black Holes in Kalb-Ramond Gravity,” Phys. Lett. B878(2026), 140562

    2026

  52. [52]

    Energy extraction from a rotating Buchdahl star via magnetic reconnection,

    I. Eshtursunov and S. Shaymatov, “Energy extraction from a rotating Buchdahl star via magnetic reconnection,” [arXiv:2603.17928 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    Magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black hole,

    I. Eshtursunov and S. Shaymatov, “Magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black hole,” [arXiv:2604.27797 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Energy extraction from a novel Kerr-de Sitter black hole via magnetic reconnection,

    J. Y. Liu, B. Zhao and C. H. Wang, “Energy extraction from a novel Kerr-de Sitter black hole via magnetic reconnection,” Phys. Lett. B879(2026), 140571

    2026

  55. [55]

    Energy Extraction via Magnetic Recon- nection from a Rotating Dyonic Black Hole inN= 2, U(1)2 Gauged Supergravity,

    R. M. Suleiman, S. Rodriguez, D. O. Chang and L. Rodriguez, “Energy Extraction via Magnetic Recon- nection from a Rotating Dyonic Black Hole inN= 2, U(1)2 Gauged Supergravity,” [arXiv:2606.23862 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Comisso-Asenjo Mechanism in Rotating N= 2, U(1) 2 Gauged Supergravity Black Holes: Extended Comparison With Kerr Black Hole,

    A. Jaguri, H. Nandan, P. Sheoran and S. Shaymatov, “Comisso-Asenjo Mechanism in Rotating N= 2, U(1) 2 Gauged Supergravity Black Holes: Extended Comparison With Kerr Black Hole,” [arXiv:2606.11732 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Energy extraction from NED-deformed rotating black holes via the Comisso-Asenjo reconnection process,

    M. Figliolia, G. Lambiase, A. Övgün and R. C. Pantig, “Energy extraction from NED-deformed rotating black holes via the Comisso-Asenjo reconnection process,” [arXiv:2605.26369 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations of Gravitation,

    K. Godel, “An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations of Gravitation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.21(1949), 447-450

    1949

  59. [59]

    The Chronology protection conjecture,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Chronology protection conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D46(1992), 603-611

    1992

  60. [60]

    Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,

    B. Carter, “Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,” Phys. Rev. Lett.26(1971), 331-333

    1971

  61. [61]

    Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole,

    D. C. Robinson, “Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. Lett.34(1975), 905-906

    1975

  62. [62]

    Supermassive black holes or boson stars? Hair counting with gravitational 17 wave detectors,

    E. Berti and V. Cardoso, “Supermassive black holes or boson stars? Hair counting with gravitational 17 wave detectors,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15(2006), 2209-2216

    2006

  63. [63]

    General static axisymmetric solution of Einstein’s vacuum field equations in prolate spheroidal coordinates,

    H. Quevedo, “General static axisymmetric solution of Einstein’s vacuum field equations in prolate spheroidal coordinates,” Phys. Rev. D39(1989) no.10, 2904

    1989

  64. [64]

    Generalization of Kerr spacetime,

    H. Quevedo and B. Mashhoon, “Generalization of Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D43(1991), 3902-3906

    1991

  65. [65]

    Generalized Kerr spacetime with an arbitrary mass quadrupole moment: Geometric properties versus particle motion,

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, O. Luongo and H. Quevedo, “Generalized Kerr spacetime with an arbitrary mass quadrupole moment: Geometric properties versus particle motion,” Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009), 225006

    2009

  66. [66]

    Penrose process in magnetized non-Kerr rotating spacetime with anomalous quadrupole moment,

    S. J. Zhang, “Penrose process in magnetized non-Kerr rotating spacetime with anomalous quadrupole moment,” JCAP12(2025), 004

    2025

  67. [67]

    Accretion disk luminosity around rotating naked singularities,

    Y. Kurmanov, K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, M. Muccino, O. Luongo, A. Urazalina, A. Dalelkhankyzy, F. Belissarova and M. Alimkulova, “Accretion disk luminosity around rotating naked singularities,” Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025), 101917

    2025

  68. [68]

    On Relativistic Multipole Moments of Stationary Spacetimes,

    F. Frutos-Alfaro and M. Soffel, “On Relativistic Multipole Moments of Stationary Spacetimes,” Roy. Soc. Open Sci.5(2018), 180640

    2018

  69. [69]

    The theory of gravitation,

    H. Weyl, “The theory of gravitation,” Annalen Phys.54(1917), 117-145

    1917

  70. [70]

    Champs gravitationnels stationnaires à symétrie axiale,

    A. Papapetrou, “Champs gravitationnels stationnaires à symétrie axiale,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A4(1966) no.2, 83-105

    1966

  71. [71]

    Exterior gravitational field of a rotating deformed mass,

    H. Quevedo and B. Mashhoon, “Exterior gravitational field of a rotating deformed mass,” Phys. Lett. A109(1985) no.1-2, 13-18

    1985

  72. [72]

    The Gravitational Field of a Particle Possessing a Multipole Moment,

    G. Erez and N. Rosen, “The Gravitational Field of a Particle Possessing a Multipole Moment,” Bull. Res. Counc. Isr.8F(1959), 47-50

    1959

  73. [73]

    Introduction to General Relativity. A Course for Undergraduate Students of Physics,

    C. Bambi, “Introduction to General Relativity. A Course for Undergraduate Students of Physics,” Springer, 2018, ISBN 9789811310898, 9789811310904

    2018

  74. [74]

    Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,” Astrophys. J.178(1972), 347

    1972

  75. [75]

    Testing the rotational nature of the supermassive object M87* from the circularity and size of its first image,

    C. Bambi, K. Freese, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, “Testing the rotational nature of the supermassive object M87* from the circularity and size of its first image,” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no.4, 044057

    2019

  76. [76]

    Magnetic Penrose process in the magnetized Kerr spacetime,

    C. Chakraborty, P. Patil and G. Akash, “Magnetic Penrose process in the magnetized Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.6, 064062

    2024

  77. [77]

    On the Value of the Reconnection Rate,

    L. Comisso and A. Bhattacharjee, “On the Value of the Reconnection Rate,” J. Plasma Phys.82, no.6, 595820601 (2016)

    2016

  78. [78]

    Visco-Resistive Plasmoid Instability,

    L. Comisso and D. Grasso, “Visco-Resistive Plasmoid Instability,” Phys. Plasmas23, 032111 (2016)

    2016

  79. [79]

    Probing the Penrose process: Images of split hotspots and their observational signatures,

    Z. Zhao, Z. Y. Fan, X. Wang, M. Guo and B. Chen, “Probing the Penrose process: Images of split hotspots and their observational signatures,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.4, 044019

    2026

  80. [80]

    Hotspot images driven by magnetic reconnection in Kerr–Sen black hole,

    K. Wang and X. X. Zeng, “Hotspot images driven by magnetic reconnection in Kerr–Sen black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) no.1, 41

    2026

Showing first 80 references.