Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 80 references

A dispersive decomposition with smooth source terms, fit to one-dimensional projected data, predicts the two-dimensional Dalitz event and CP-asymmetry distributions of B±→K±π+π− below 1 GeV, and traces the large localized CP violation to a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 01:34 UTC pith:PUZTFKGQ

load-bearing objection Solid, honest dispersive follow-up to the authors' PRL: the method is sound, but the Dalitz 'prediction' is a consistency check of the same fitted data, and the S2 finding rests on a slope the authors admit is non-physical. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25764 v1 pith:PUZTFKGQ submitted 2026-07-28 hep-ph hep-ex

A dispersive method to study CP asymmetries in hadronic multi-body B decays

L. A. Heuser , A. Reyes-Torrecilla , C. Hanhart , Y. Huang , B. Kubis , P. C. Magalh\~aes , T. Mannel , J. R. Pel\'aez This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords CP violationthree-body B decaysdispersive methodsOmnès formalismfinal-state interactionsDalitz plotisospin-2 S-wavepion-pion scattering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Hadronic three-body B decays are hard to compute, but their long-distance final-state interactions are universal. This paper argues that for B±→K±π+π− in the low-mass region, the full two-dimensional Dalitz plot of events and of the CP asymmetry can be predicted from a fit to one-dimensional, angle-integrated data alone, using dispersion theory to factor out the ππ rescattering. The mechanism behind the large localized CP asymmetries is identified: not a large CP-violating numerator, but a local suppression of the CP-conserving denominator from interference between partial waves. The paper also finds that the isospin-2, non-resonant S-wave, usually neglected, is essential to describe the CP asymmetries.

Core claim

The central claim is that the B±→K±π+π− amplitude below 1 GeV in ππ invariant mass can be written as a sum of partial waves in which all strong energy dependence is carried by universal Omnès functions (or a coupled-channel Omnès matrix for the scalar-isoscalar wave), while the weak-decay 'source' is just a small set of constants and linear polynomials. Fitting only the s-projected, forward/backward integrated event rates fixes 13 source parameters; the same parameters then reproduce, without further adjustment, the two-dimensional Dalitz-plot event distribution and the A_CP map in the region m_{ππ}<1 GeV. The paper's explanation of the large localized CP violation is that it is not driven b

What carries the argument

The machinery is the dispersive decomposition A_i^±(s)=P_i(s)Ω_i(s)\bar A_i^±, with Ω_i the Omnès function built from ππ phase shifts (and a two-channel Omnès matrix for the S0 wave involving ππ↔K\bar K). Ω encodes Watson's-theorem phases and the universal FSI; P_i(s) and the source constants \bar A_i^± hold the reaction-specific, slowly varying weak-production information. The 13 fitted parameters are the real and imaginary parts of these source terms plus three slope parameters; the power of the method is that once they are fixed by projected yields, the t-dependence enters only through the known P-wave angular factor, so the two-dimensional distribution is a prediction.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, below 1 GeV in pion-pair mass, the weak-decay source terms are smooth: constant or linear in s, with energy-independent CP-even phases from charm loops, so that all nontrivial energy dependence comes from the universal ππ final-state interactions.

What would settle it

Perform the same fit with energy-dependent source phases (e.g., including left-hand cuts or a running charm-loop parameter) and compare to the projected data; or measure the predicted S0n–S2 interference rise above 1 GeV² with accurate acceptance corrections. If a significantly energy-dependent source is required, the reported S2 'essential role' and the denominator-dip explanation would shift.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Fitting only one-dimensional projected yields reproduces the two-dimensional event distribution and CP-asymmetry map for m_{ππ}<1 GeV.
  • Large localized CP asymmetries (|A_CP|≳60%) are local minima of the CP-conserving rate, not large CP-violating differences; the same pattern should appear in other decays if the mechanism is general.
  • Removing the isospin-2 S-wave makes the fit visibly worse and distorts the predicted Dalitz CP pattern, so analyses that omit non-resonant isospin-2 partial waves will miss CP-violating structure.
  • Strong phases in the amplitude are fixed by ππ scattering phase shifts, so once source parameters are fitted, the angular (t) dependence is a genuine prediction rather than a free fit.
  • The method extends to other multibody decays where a two-hadron subsystem's final-state interactions dominate, including modes with Kπ or ππ final states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fit's S2 slope parameter is suspiciously large (−1.67 GeV⁻²) and produces a rise above 1 GeV² that the authors themselves call non-physical; a direct experimental or lattice test of the energy dependence of the isospin-2 ππ source would decide whether the 'essential' S2 role survives beyond the polynomial approximation.
  • If the source terms really are almost energy-independent, then the same 13-parameter structure should predict the CP asymmetry in adjacent bins above 1 GeV or in decay modes sharing the same weak operators; deviations there would locate where left-hand cuts or charm-loop energy dependence become visible.
  • The denominator-dip mechanism predicts that CP hotspots are sensitive to the partial-wave interference pattern; changing the bachelor meson (K→π) or isospin should move or resize the hotspots, giving a cheap cross-check in other B→3h channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a dispersive framework for hadronic three-body B decays, applied to B±→K±π+π− in the elastic ππ region m_{ππ}<1 GeV. The amplitude is split into slowly varying source terms, parametrized by constants and first-order polynomials, and universal final-state interactions encoded in Omnès functions: single-channel Omnès functions for the S2 and P waves and a coupled-channel ππ–K̄K Omnès matrix for the two S0 components. The weak sources include constant CP-even imaginary parts attributed to charm loops. The 13 resulting source parameters plus a background slope are fitted to the forward/backward s-projected LHCb yields, and then the model is used to ‘predict’ the 2D Dalitz-plot distributions of events and of A_CP. The paper claims that the large localized CP asymmetries are due to suppression of the CP-conserving denominator and that the non-resonant isospin-2 S2 wave is essential.

Significance. If the source-term ansatz is reliable, the formalism is a significant step beyond Breit–Wigner and K-matrix models: strong phases are taken from data-driven dispersive analyses, two-body unitarity is implemented exactly in the elastic regime, and the method is modular and transferable to other channels. The paper is transparent about its main assumptions and includes useful stability checks, a covariance matrix, and explicit decompositions of the CP asymmetries into partial-wave interferences. The central phenomenological conclusions, however, rest on the assumption that the production sources are almost energy-independent. The fit quality is modest (χ²/d.o.f. = 3.4) and the authors themselves label the fitted S2-driven rise above 1 GeV² as non-physical and caused by neglected left-hand cuts. Because the S2-essentiality claim and the predicted Dalitz structure are driven by that same fitted polynomial, the abstract’s ‘successfully predicts’ is stronger than the current evidence supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, App. A.1/A.2, Sec. 8] The central phenomenological conclusions rest on the smooth-source assumption stated in Sec. 1 and Eq. (2.10), i.e., P_i(s) linear and c_i(s) constant. The fit already shows strain: p_S2 = −1.67(3) GeV⁻² (Table 1), and the paper concedes (Sec. 5) that the resulting S0n–S2 rise above 1 GeV² is ‘non-physical ... typically generated from left-hand cuts neglected here’. Since Sec. 8’s claim that the S2 wave is essential is based on this fit, and the Dalitz predictions of Secs. 6–7 inherit the same parameters, a robustness test against more structured sources is load-bearing. I ask for a refit allowing, e.g., quadratic terms in P_i(s) or a linear energy dependence in the c_i, and a check that the large-|A_CP| regions, the denominator-dip explanation, and the S2 role survive. Without such a test, the abstract’s ‘successfully predicts’ is premature.
  2. [Sec. 6, Eqs. (4.5)–(4.10), Figs. 7–8] The ‘prediction’ of the Dalitz plot is a postdiction on the same LHCb data set [7] from which the projected yields were fitted. Because the four projected observables are linear integrals of Γ±(s,t) over the fixed angular kernels, the model reproducing those projections is consistency, not independent validation. The genuinely predictive content is the t/angular dependence inside each s-bin, and the comparison in Figs. 7–8 is only visual. To support the central claim, the paper should provide a quantitative measure of agreement in the 2D region (e.g., binned pulls or a χ² over the Dalitz bins) and, ideally, confront an independent sample or a Dalitz subsample not used in the fit. The current evidence is suggestive but not statistically established.
  3. [Sec. 7, Fig. 11] The fixed slice is quoted as t0 = 0.12 GeV², where t = m²_{K+π−} by Eq. (2.2). This value lies below the physical Kπ threshold, (m_K+m_π)² ≈ 0.4 GeV², and is therefore outside the Dalitz region. If this is a typo for t0 = 12 GeV², the text and figure caption must be corrected; if taken literally, the s-slice argument in Fig. 11 cannot be used to explain the large localized A_CP. The authors should clarify and correct this point.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, footnote 1] Typo: ‘ovserved’ should be ‘observed’.
  2. [Appendix B, Fig. 16 caption] Duplicate phrase: ‘central values of the central values of the parameters’.
  3. [Sec. 1, Assumption 2] The statement that the Kπ invariant mass is O(M_B) in the low-s region should be qualified: at s ≈ 0.4 GeV² the physical t range extends down to about 1.6 GeV², not O(M_B²). The validity of neglecting kaon rescattering in the corners of the low-s Dalitz region could affect the interpretation of the 2D plots.
  4. [App. A.1] The background slope B = 50(20) GeV⁻¹ is set by hand, and the data are neither acceptance corrected nor background subtracted. The paper addresses this, but the impact of the background assumption on the fitted source parameters should be stated explicitly in the main text, not only in the appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction found; the Dalitz-plot prediction is a model-based extrapolation beyond the fitted s-projected data, with admitted model-dependence caveats that are correctness risks rather than circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined here. The final-state-interaction input is external to the CP fit: the Omnès functions are constructed from data-driven ππ and ππ→K̄K scattering information (refs. [24–28,40,41,49]), not from the B-decay CP observables. The weak-production source parameters in Eq. (3.4) are then fitted only to the s-projected LHCb yields and CP asymmetries from Ref. [7] via Eqs. (A.1)–(A.2), and the paper explicitly states that only these angle-integrated quantities enter the fit. The subsequent two-dimensional Dalitz distributions are obtained by evaluating the same amplitude Eq. (2.18) at fixed t, so in a loose sense Figs. 7–8 are a re-projection of the fitted amplitude. But this is not a reduction by construction: the t-dependence is imposed by the assumed partial-wave angular kernels f_i(s,t) in Eq. (2.5) and by the Omnès/polynomial s-dependence, and the four projected distributions pin only integrated angular moments, not the full (s,t) map. The 2D shape therefore remains a falsifiable consequence of the S0/S2/P angular ansatz, not an input to the fit. The admitted 'non-physical' rise of the S0n–S2 interference beyond 1 GeV² (Sec. 5), driven by the fitted slope p_S2, and the χ²/d.o.f. = 3.4 are genuine model-dependence/neglected left-hand-cut concerns, but they are correctness risks, not circularity. Self-citations, including Ref. [23], are contextual: the S2 claim is re-derived here through the fit comparisons in Sec. 8 and Fig. 12, and the cited Omnès-matrix input is itself data-driven. No step exhibits Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as an independent prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

14 free parameters · 11 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on 13 fitted source/polynomial parameters plus a hand-set background slope, all determined from the same LHCb projections [7] whose (s,t) structure is later reported as a 'prediction'. The s-dependence of the sources (linear polynomials, constant charm-loop phases) is assumed, not derived. No new particles or dynamics are invented; the charm-loop absorptive parts are a known mechanism (Refs. [57,58]) whose strengths are fit constants. The genuine external grounding is the published ππ scattering information (Omnès functions/matrices, phase shifts).

free parameters (14)
  • aS0n = 6.8(13)×10² (relative units)
    Real CP-even isoscalar non-strange scalar source strength; fit to LHCb projections.
  • aS0s = −8.9(7)×10³
    Real CP-even isoscalar strange scalar source strength; fit parameter.
  • aS2 = −2.6(3)×10³
    Real CP-even isotensor scalar source strength; fit parameter.
  • aP = −5.9(3)×10¹ GeV⁻²
    Real CP-even P-wave source strength; fit parameter.
  • bS0n = 1.0(1)×10³
    CP-odd (∝ sin γ) non-strange scalar source; fit parameter driving CP asymmetries.
  • bS2 = 2.9(1)×10³
    CP-odd isotensor source; key to the S2-essential claim.
  • bP = −5.0(3)×10¹ GeV⁻²
    CP-odd P-wave source; fit parameter.
  • cS0n = −6.0(1)×10²
    CP-even imaginary (charm-loop absorptive) non-strange scalar source; assumed s-independent constant.
  • cS0s = −2.4(3)×10³
    CP-even imaginary strange scalar source; fit parameter.
  • cP = 0.53(8)×10¹ GeV⁻²
    CP-even imaginary P-wave source; produces the ρ peak in ΔΓ_CP⁽⁺⁾ (Eq. (4.10)).
  • pS0 = −0.41(6) GeV⁻²
    Slope of the polynomial P_S0(s) multiplying the S0 wave (Eq. (2.10)); encodes residual s-dependence beyond the Omnès function.
  • pS2 = −1.67(3) GeV⁻²
    Slope of P_S2(s); large and drives the admitted 'non-physical' S0n–S2 interference rise above 1 GeV² (Sec. 5).
  • pP = 0.4(1) GeV⁻²
    Slope of the P-wave polynomial P_P(s).
  • B (background slope) = 50(20) GeV⁻¹
    Hand-set linear background slope mimicking LHCb's combinatorial background (Eq. (A.2)); not fitted, uncertainty absorbed into bins.
axioms (11)
  • standard math Omnès solution of two-body unitarity discontinuity relations (Eqs. (2.7)-(2.10))
    Standard dispersion theory; solution of the Omnès equation; taken as established, not proved in the paper.
  • standard math Coupled-channel Muskhelishvili–Omnès integral equation (Eq. (2.15)) and its numerical solution from Ref. [49]
    Established method; the Omnès matrix is imported from Ropertz–Hanhart–Kubis (Ref. [49]).
  • domain assumption Accurate ππ and ππ→K̄K phase shifts/inelasticities as inputs
    Inputs come from Refs. [26,28,40,41]; the entire FSI sector rests on their correctness.
  • ad hoc to paper Weakly energy-dependent source terms parametrized by first-order polynomials (Assumption 1, Sec. 1; Eq. (2.10))
    Central modeling assumption; the S2 slope p_S2 is large and drives non-physical behavior the authors acknowledge (Sec. 5).
  • domain assumption Negligible kaon rescattering (Assumption 2, Sec. 1)
    Justified by the large recoil energy of the kaon; not quantitatively verified.
  • ad hoc to paper Left-hand cuts and open-charm-loop imaginary parts approximated by constants (Assumption 3; Sec. 3.1)
    The c_i charm-loop absorptive parts are fit constants; energy dependence near charm thresholds argued negligible below 1 GeV.
  • domain assumption Chiral leading-order identification of the S0 sources: Ω_S0n = Ω11 + ½Ω12, Ω_S0s = Ω12 (Eq. (2.17))
    Taken from scalar-form-factor normalizations of Ref. [42]; the paper contents itself with leading chiral order.
  • domain assumption Flavor/isospin constraints on sources: b_S0s = 0, c_S2 = 0 (Sec. 3.1)
    From the ¯uu-only origin of the CP-odd phase γ and the isospin of the operators; the paper checked both by releasing them in test fits.
  • domain assumption ρ–ω mixing with ω couplings fixed from the ρ source (Sec. 3.2)
    Follows Ref. [33] with a ¯uu source structure; factor-3 relative enhancement vs. e+e−→π+π− (Eqs. (3.7)-(3.8)); releasing the ω coupling did not improve the fit.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear non-interfering combinatorial background B = 50(20) GeV⁻¹ (Eq. (A.2))
    Mimics LHCb's background; uncertainty absorbed into bin uncertainties; affects all fitted parameters and thus the predictions.
  • domain assumption D0-meson veto angular correction (Eqs. (A.4)-(A.5))
    Imports LHCb's D0 cut (1.740 GeV < m_Kπ < 1.894 GeV) from Ref. [10] and corrects the angular integration limits accordingly.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28159 in / 28622 out tokens · 271903 ms · 2026-08-01T01:34:31.662749+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the details of a dispersive method to construct the amplitudes for hadronic multibody $B$ decays based on the universality of pairwise hadronic final-state interactions at low invariant masses. This approach allows us to split the amplitude into source terms controlled by phenomenological parameters and final-state interactions, governed by the precise knowledge of two-body dynamics, both resonant and non-resonant. As a concrete application, we make use of the well-determined low-energy pion-pion ($\pi\pi$) interactions to understand the enhanced localized CP violation observed in $B^{\pm}\rightarrow K^{\pm}\pi^+\pi^-$. Fitting only angle-integrated CP-asymmetry data, the method successfully predicts the Dalitz plot differential distribution of events and of the CP asymmetry in the low-energy region. This allows for a better understanding of the large localized CP asymmetry recently reported by LHCb, which is shown not to be driven by an absolute enhancement of CP-violating effects, but by a suppression of the CP-conserving part resulting from the interplay of several partial waves. Moreover, we show that the widely-neglected non-resonant isospin-2 contributions play an essential role in the description of CP violation in this system. The method can be straightforwardly adapted to other multibody decays, where final-state two-hadron interactions drive the CP violation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kr¨ ankl, T

    S. Kr¨ ankl, T. Mannel and J. Virto,Three-body non-leptonic B decays and QCD factorization , Nucl. Phys. B 899 (2015) 247 [ 1505.04111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Cabibbo, Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays , Phys

    N. Cabibbo, Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays , Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 531

    1963

  3. [3]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652

    1973

  4. [4]

    LHCb collaboration, Measurement of CP violation in the phase space of B±→K±π+π− and B±→K±K +K− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101801 [ 1306.1246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    LHCb collaboration, Measurement of CP violation in the phase space of B±→K +K−π± and B±→π+π−π± decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 011801 [ 1310.4740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    LHCb collaboration, Measurements of CP violation in the three-body phase space of charmless B± decays, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 112004 [ 1408.5373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    LHCb collaboration, Direct CP violation in charmless three-body decays of B± mesons, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 012008 [ 2206.07622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    LHCb collaboration, Observation of Several Sources of CP Violation in B+→π+π+π− Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 031801 [ 1909.05211]

    arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    LHCb collaboration, Amplitude analysis of the B+→π+π+π− decay, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012006 [ 1909.05212]

    arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    LHCb collaboration, Amplitude analysis of B±→π±K +K− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 231802 [ 1905.09244]. 4Beware of the factor of 2 in the definition of the t matrix, which customarily appears in the partial-wave basis. Otherwise one may confuse the S and S 1/2 expansions (see the discussion in Ref. [14]). – 34 –

    arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Bhattacharya, M

    B. Bhattacharya, M. Gronau and J.L. Rosner, CP asymmetries in three-body B± decays to charged pions and kaons , Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 337 [ 1306.2625]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Bediaga, T

    I. Bediaga, T. Frederico and O. Louren¸ co, CP violation and CPT invariance in B± decays with final state interactions , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094013 [ 1307.8164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Alvarenga Nogueira, I

    J.H. Alvarenga Nogueira, I. Bediaga, A.B.R. Cavalcante, T. Frederico and O. Louren¸ co,CP violation: Dalitz interference, CPT , and final state interactions , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 054010 [1506.08332]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    ´Alvarez Garrote, J

    R. ´Alvarez Garrote, J. Cuervo, P.C. Magalh˜ aes and J.R. Pel´ aez,Dispersiveππ→K ¯K Amplitude and Giant CP Violation in B to Three Light-Meson Decays at LHCb , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 201901 [ 2210.08354]

    arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Furman, R

    A. Furman, R. Kami´ nski, L. Le´ sniak and B. Loiseau,Long-distance effects and final state interactions in B→ππK and B→K ¯KK decays, Phys. Lett. B 622 (2005) 207 [hep-ph/0504116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    El-Bennich, A

    B. El-Bennich, A. Furman, R. Kami´ nski, L. Le´ sniak and B. Loiseau,Interference between f0(980) and ρ(770)0 resonances in B→π+π−K decays, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 114009 [hep-ph/0608205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    El-Bennich, A

    B. El-Bennich, A. Furman, R. Kami´ nski, L. Le´ sniak, B. Loiseau and B. Moussallam,CP violation and kaon-pion interactions in B→Kπ +π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 094005 [Erratum Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 039903] [ 0902.3645]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Cheng, C.-K

    H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua and Z.-Q. Zhang, Direct CP Violation in Charmless Three-body Decays of B Mesons, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 094015 [ 1607.08313]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Boito, J.P

    D. Boito, J.P. Dedonder, B. El-Bennich, R. Escribano, R. Kami´ nski, L. Le´ sniak et al., Parametrizations of three-body hadronic B- and D-decay amplitudes in terms of analytic and unitary meson-meson form factors , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 113003 [ 1709.09739]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Cheng and C.-K

    H.-Y. Cheng and C.-K. Chua, Branching fractions and CP violation in B−→K +K−π− and B−→π+π−π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 053006 [ 2007.02558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Bediaga and C

    I. Bediaga and C. G¨ obel,DirectCP violation in beauty and charm hadron decays , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114 (2020) 103808 [ 2009.07037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    S. Chen, Y. Li, W. Qian, Z. Shen, Y. Xie, Z. Yang et al., Heavy Flavour Physics and CP Violation at LHCb: a Ten-Year Review , Front. Phys. 18 (2023) 44601 [ 2111.14360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Heuser, A

    L.A. Heuser, A. Reyes-Torrecilla, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, P.C. Magalh˜ aes, T. Mannel et al., Understanding Large Localized CP Violation in B±→K±π+π− Using Dispersive Methods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (2026) 111901 [ 2508.10989]

    arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Ananthanarayan, G

    B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Roy equation analysis of ππ scattering, Phys. Rept. 353 (2001) 207 [ hep-ph/0005297]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    Colangelo, J

    G. Colangelo, J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, ππ scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 603 (2001) 125 [hep-ph/0103088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, R

    R. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, R. Kami´ nski, J.R. Pel´ aez, J. Ruiz de Elvira and F.J. Yndur´ ain,The Pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 074004 [ 1102.2183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [27]

    Caprini, G

    I. Caprini, G. Colangelo and H. Leutwyler, Regge analysis of the ππ scattering amplitude, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1860 [ 1111.7160]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Pel´ aez, P

    J.R. Pel´ aez, P. Rab´ an and J. Ruiz de Elvira,Global parametrizations of ππ scattering with dispersive constraints: Beyond the S0 wave , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 074003 [ 2412.15327]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Aitchison, K-matrix formalism for overlapping resonances , Nucl

    I.J.R. Aitchison, K-matrix formalism for overlapping resonances , Nucl. Phys. A 189 (1972) 417

    1972

  30. [30]

    Chung, J

    S.U. Chung, J. Brose, R. Hackmann, E. Klempt, S. Spanier and C. Strassburger, Partial wave analysis in K-matrix formalism, Annalen Phys. 4 (1995) 404

    1995

  31. [31]

    Gardner and U.-G

    S. Gardner and U.-G. Meißner, Rescattering and chiral dynamics in B→ρπ decay, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 094004 [ hep-ph/0112281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    Meißner and J.A

    U.-G. Meißner and J.A. Oller, J/ψ→ϕππ (K ¯K) decays, chiral dynamics and OZI violation , Nucl. Phys. A 679 (2001) 671 [ hep-ph/0005253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    J.T. Daub, C. Hanhart and B. Kubis, A model-independent analysis of final-state interactions in ¯B0 d/s→J/ψππ , JHEP 02 (2016) 009 [ 1508.06841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Omn` es,On the Solution of certain singular integral equations of quantum field theory , Nuovo Cim

    R. Omn` es,On the Solution of certain singular integral equations of quantum field theory , Nuovo Cim. 8 (1958) 316

    1958

  35. [35]

    Watson, Some general relations between the photoproduction and scattering of π mesons, Phys

    K.M. Watson, Some general relations between the photoproduction and scattering of π mesons, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 228

    1954

  36. [36]

    Kubis and J

    B. Kubis and J. Plenter, Anomalous decay and scattering processes of the η meson, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 283 [ 1504.02588]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Cohen, D.S

    D.H. Cohen, D.S. Ayres, R. Diebold, S.L. Kramer, A.J. Pawlicki and A.B. Wicklund, Amplitude Analysis of the K−K + System Produced in the Reactions π−p→K−K +n and π+n→K−K +p at 6 GeV/c, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2595

    1980

  38. [38]

    Etkin et al., Amplitude Analysis of the K 0 SK 0 S System Produced in the Reaction π−p→K 0 SK 0 Sn at 23 GeV/c, Phys

    A. Etkin et al., Amplitude Analysis of the K 0 SK 0 S System Produced in the Reaction π−p→K 0 SK 0 Sn at 23 GeV/c, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 1786

    1982

  39. [39]

    B¨ uttiker, S

    P. B¨ uttiker, S. Descotes-Genon and B. Moussallam,A new analysis of πK scattering from Roy and Steiner type equations , Eur. Phys. J. C 33 (2004) 409 [ hep-ph/0310283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  40. [40]

    Pel´ aez and A

    J.R. Pel´ aez and A. Rodas,ππ→K ¯K scattering up to 1.47 GeV with hyperbolic dispersion relations, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 897 [ 1807.04543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Pel´ aez and A

    J.R. Pel´ aez and A. Rodas,DispersiveπK→πK and ππ→K ¯K amplitudes from scattering data, threshold parameters, and the lightest strange resonance κ or K∗ 0(700), Phys. Rept. 969 (2022) 1 [ 2010.11222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Donoghue, J

    J.F. Donoghue, J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, The Decay of a Light Higgs Boson , Nucl. Phys. B 343 (1990) 341

    1990

  43. [43]

    Moussallam, Nf dependence of the quark condensate from a chiral sum rule , Eur

    B. Moussallam, Nf dependence of the quark condensate from a chiral sum rule , Eur. Phys. J. C 14 (2000) 111 [ hep-ph/9909292]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  44. [44]

    Descotes-Genon, Zweig rule violation in the scalar sector and values of low-energy constants, JHEP 03 (2001) 002 [ hep-ph/0012221]

    S. Descotes-Genon, Zweig rule violation in the scalar sector and values of low-energy constants, JHEP 03 (2001) 002 [ hep-ph/0012221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Hoferichter, C

    M. Hoferichter, C. Ditsche, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner, Dispersive analysis of the scalar form factor of the nucleon , JHEP 06 (2012) 063 [ 1204.6251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Daub, H.K

    J.T. Daub, H.K. Dreiner, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner, Improving the Hadron Physics of Non-Standard-Model Decays: Example Bounds on R-parity Violation , JHEP 01 (2013) 179 [ 1212.4408]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Celis, V

    A. Celis, V. Cirigliano and E. Passemar, Lepton flavor violation in the Higgs sector and the role of hadronic τ-lepton decays, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 013008 [ 1309.3564]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Winkler, Decay and detection of a light scalar boson mixing with the Higgs boson , Phys

    M.W. Winkler, Decay and detection of a light scalar boson mixing with the Higgs boson , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015018 [ 1809.01876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Ropertz, C

    S. Ropertz, C. Hanhart and B. Kubis, A new parametrization for the scalar pion form factors, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 1000 [ 1809.06867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Albaladejo, J.T

    M. Albaladejo, J.T. Daub, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis and B. Moussallam, How to employ ¯B0 d→J/ψ ( πη, ¯KK ) decays to extract information on πη scattering, JHEP 04 (2017) 010 [1611.03502]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Chau and W.-Y

    L.-L. Chau and W.-Y. Keung, Comments on the Parametrization of the Kobayashi–Maskawa Matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 1802

    1984

  52. [52]

    Khuri and S.B

    N.N. Khuri and S.B. Treiman, Pion–Pion Scattering and K±→ 3π Decay, Phys. Rev. 119 (1960) 1115

    1960

  53. [53]

    Niecknig and B

    F. Niecknig and B. Kubis, Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the D+→K−π+π+ Dalitz plot, JHEP 10 (2015) 142 [ 1509.03188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Niecknig and B

    F. Niecknig and B. Kubis, Consistent Dalitz plot analysis of Cabibbo-favored D+→ ¯Kππ + decays, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 471 [ 1708.00446]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Stamen, T

    D. Stamen, T. Isken, B. Kubis, M. Mikhasenko and M. Niehus, Analysis of rescattering effects in 3π final states, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 510 [Erratum Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 586] [2212.11767]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    E. Kou, T. Moskalets and B. Moussallam, Isospin symmetry and analyticity in D→ ¯Kππ decays, JHEP 12 (2023) 177 [ 2303.12015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Bediaga, T

    I. Bediaga, T. Frederico and P.C. Magalh˜ aes,CP asymmetry from hadronic charm rescattering in B±→π−π+π± decays at the high mass region , Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135490 [2003.10019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Mannel, K

    T. Mannel, K. Olschewsky and K.K. Vos, CP Violation in Three-body B Decays: A Model Ansatz, JHEP 06 (2020) 073 [ 2003.12053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Klein, T

    R. Klein, T. Mannel, J. Virto and K.K. Vos, CP Violation in Multibody B Decays from QCD Factorization, JHEP 10 (2017) 117 [ 1708.02047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Wolfenstein, Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix , Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix , Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1945

    1983

  61. [61]

    Colangelo, M

    G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 006 [ 1810.00007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    S. Holz, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter and B. Kubis, A dispersive analysis of η′→π+π−γ and η′→ℓ+ℓ−γ, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 434 [ 2202.05846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Colangelo, M

    G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis and P. Stoffer, Isospin-breaking effects in the two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization , JHEP 10 (2022) 032 [ 2208.08993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    J.M. Dias, T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner et al., Dispersive analysis of the isospin breaking in the X(3872)→J/ψπ +π− and X(3872)→J/ψπ +π0π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 014031 [ 2409.13245]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Cao, F.-K

    X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart and B. Kubis, Dispersive analysis of the J/ψ→π0γ∗ transition form factor with ρ–ω mixing effects, Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 074030 [2512.00501]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Press, S.A

    W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 3 ed. (2007)

    2007

  67. [67]

    Suzuki and L

    M. Suzuki and L. Wolfenstein, Final state interaction phase in B decays , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 074019 [ hep-ph/9903477]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  68. [68]

    Chua, Rescattering effects in charmless ¯Bu,d,s→PP decays, Phys

    C.-K. Chua, Rescattering effects in charmless ¯Bu,d,s→PP decays, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 076002 [0712.4187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Wolfenstein, Final state interactions and CP violation in weak decays , Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Final state interactions and CP violation in weak decays , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 151

    1991

  70. [70]

    Bigi and A.I

    I.I. Bigi and A.I. Sanda, CP violation, vol. 9, Cambridge University Press (9, 2009), 10.1017/CBO9780511581014

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581014 2009

  71. [71]

    Beneke, G

    M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert and C.T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization for B→ππ decays: Strong phases and CP violation in the heavy quark limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1914 [hep-ph/9905312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  72. [72]

    Chay and C

    J. Chay and C. Kim, Nonleptonic B decays into two light mesons in soft collinear effective theory, Nucl. Phys. B 680 (2004) 302 [ hep-ph/0301262]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    Cheng, C.-K

    H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua and A. Soni, Charmless three-body decays of B mesons , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 094006 [ 0704.1049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  74. [74]

    Aaij et al., Private communication, 2025

    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Private communication, 2025

    2025

  75. [75]

    Belle collaboration, Evidence for large direct CP violation in B±→ρ(770)0K± from analysis of the three-body charmless B±→K±π±π∓ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 251803 [hep-ex/0512066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  76. [76]

    BaBar collaboration, Evidence for Direct CP Violation from Dalitz-plot analysis of B±→K±π∓π±, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 012004 [ 0803.4451]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    Simma and D

    H. Simma and D. Wyler, Branching ratios and CP violating asymmetries in exclusive charged B meson decays, Phys. Lett. B 272 (1991) 395

    1991

  78. [78]

    Fajfer, T.-N

    S. Fajfer, T.-N. Pham and A. Prapotnik, CP violation in the partial width asymmetries for B−→π+π−K− and B−→K +K−K− decays, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 034033 [hep-ph/0405065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  79. [79]

    Peskin and D.V

    M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory , Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1995)

    1995

  80. [80]

    Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics , PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01. – 38 –

    2022