Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Flat graphene membranes decouple from electrons; ripples re-couple them

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 01:32 UTC pith:ORHU5PJR

load-bearing objection Conditional accept: the classification is new and the one-loop RG holds up, but the flat-phase decoupling rests on an unverified power-counting bound that deserves a two-loop check. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25767 v2 pith:ORHU5PJR submitted 2026-07-28 cond-mat.other cond-mat.stat-mech

Critical Ripples and Dirac Fermions in Crystalline Membranes

Sebasti\'an Bahamondes , Rodrigo Soto-Garrido , Enrique Mu\~noz , Vladimir Juri\v{c}i\'c This is my paper
classification cond-mat.other cond-mat.stat-mech PACS 64.60.Fr71.10.-w81.05.ue
keywords crystalline membranesDirac fermionsrenormalization groupflat phasegrapheneKekulé orderingWilson–Fisher fixed pointGross–Neveu–Yukawa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a classification of what happens at low energies when massless Dirac electrons live on a crystalline membrane whose bending modes are slow (dynamical exponent z=2) compared with the fermions (z=1). It argues that in the flat phase the local strain–density interaction becomes logarithmically weaker and electronic feedback dies as a power law, so the flat phase is stable. If the membrane ripples at a finite wavevector, the transition is ordinarily the purely bosonic Wilson–Fisher fixed point, with the Dirac fermions as spectators. Only when the ripple order parameter carries the same momentum and quantum numbers as a mass-type Dirac bilinear does the transition become a hybrid chiral-XY Gross–Neveu–Yukawa transition, with emergent velocity locking. A sympathetic reader cares because this organizes the possible electronic–structural critical phenomena in graphene-like membranes.

Core claim

The central claim is a field-theoretic classification: at charge neutrality, dynamical scale separation forces asymptotic decoupling in the flat phase, with the dimensionless coupling flowing as gbar(l)=gbar0[1+a y0 l]^{-theta}, fermionic feedback alpha_e(l) ~ e^{-l} l^{-3theta/2} -> 0, and no Landau damping. When the membrane is destabilized at finite momentum ±Q, the transition is either Wilson–Fisher with spectator Dirac fermions (since the fermion–boson coupling has scaling dimension y_lambda=1/nu-D < 0 in D=2) or, when symmetry permits a mass-type Dirac bilinear sharing the ripple's momentum and horizontal-reflection parity, a hybrid chiral-XY Gross–Neveu–Yukawa transition with one-loop

What carries the argument

Three mechanisms carry the argument. First, the rotational/tension Ward identity of the pure membrane fixes the renormalization of the local trace-strain operator H_T, so the mixed coupling gbar=g/kappa_b inherits the membrane's marginal-irrelevant flow. Second, an expansion in s=omega_h/(v_F k), the ratio of flexural to Dirac energy scales, suppresses fermionic corrections by alpha_e=(N/16)gbar^2 s, making electronic feedback power-law irrelevant. Third, in the finite-Q sector, the scaling dimension y_lambda=1/nu-D and the Clifford-algebra matching of the ripple field with Kekulé mass matrices decide which fixed point controls the transition.

Load-bearing premise

The flat-phase half of the classification assumes both that fermions produce no infrared s^0 logarithm in the projected local strain–density vertex (a power-counting bound in Appendix D) and that the model retains only the local scalar coupling, excluding momentum-projected deformation potential and shear/pseudogauge valley couplings.

What would settle it

Compute the projected local vertex at P=0 to next order in the slow-flexural expansion for D=2: if delta g_R/g_R contains a term constant in the RG scale (an s^0 logarithm), the asymptotic decoupling flow fails. Alternatively, a careful numerical simulation of a graphene-like membrane–Dirac model measuring the effective strain–density coupling at long wavelengths could detect deviation from the predicted logarithmic decrease.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The flat phase is stable against the local scalar deformation potential: the membrane stiffens logarithmically, flexural dynamics stay undamped, and the Dirac kinetic term retains canonical scaling.
  • At a finite-momentum ripple with no symmetry-matched Dirac bilinear, the transition is the ordinary bosonic Wilson–Fisher fixed point; the Dirac fermions are spectators at criticality.
  • In the ordered ripple phase the spectator coupling still shifts the Dirac-point energy relative to the chemical potential, producing a finite carrier density or chemical-potential shift.
  • When symmetry permits a mass-type Yukawa coupling, the critical point is chiral-XY Gross–Neveu–Yukawa; an electronic instability then induces a secondary structural distortion through Landau mixing.
  • At that hybrid critical point, fermionic and bosonic velocities lock to a common terminal value in the isotropic continuum limit, restoring emergent Lorentz symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The flat-phase decoupling rests on the power-counting bound that no s^0 logarithm renormalizes the projected local vertex; a direct computation of the next correction to delta g_R/g_R would test this, and a hidden s^0 logarithm would open the possibility of weak-coupling instability at longer scales.
  • The paper explicitly omits the momentum-projected deformation potential and the shear/pseudogauge valley coupling; extending the classification to those channels could yield additional GNY universality classes, since they couple to different Dirac bilinears.
  • Asymptotic irrelevance does not rule out electron-induced rippling at intermediate scales, so the classification is compatible with experiments that observe ripples before the long-wavelength flat regime is reached.
  • For a nearly continuous ring of minima, the zero-temperature problem is marginal by power counting; working out the angularly resolved quartic flow would decide whether that transition is continuous or weakly first order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a low-energy field theory for a crystalline membrane coupled to massless Dirac fermions and proposes a classification of membrane–Dirac criticality. In the flat phase, the local scalar strain–density coupling is argued to be marginally irrelevant: rotational invariance fixes its pure-membrane renormalization, while fermionic feedback is suppressed by the running coupling α_e, so the two sectors asymptotically decouple. At finite momentum, two scenarios are distinguished: if the ripple order parameter does not share quantum numbers with any low-energy Dirac bilinear, the transition is governed by the Wilson–Fisher fixed point with spectator Dirac fermions; if it does share them (including horizontal-reflection parity), the transition belongs to the chiral-XY Gross–Neveu–Yukawa universality class, with one-loop exponents ν=4/5, η_Φ=2/3, η_ψ=1/6 and velocity locking with exponent ω_ζ=7ε/36. The GNY counterterms are re-derived in Appendix F rather than merely quoted.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a useful organizing principle for a class of problems that mixes z=1 Dirac fermions with z=2 flexural phonons, and it sharpens the distinction between asymptotic flat-phase stability and finite-momentum order. The re-derivation of the one-loop membrane and GNY flows, the explicit symmetry bookkeeping for the Kekulé mass matrices, and the concrete predictions for velocities and exponents are strengths. The classification is, however, stated more broadly than the actual model, and the flat-phase leg relies on a power-counting estimate in Appendix D that is not backed by an explicit computation. These issues do not invalidate the overall picture, but they need to be addressed before the classification can be taken as established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2 and Appendix D, Eqs. (D.13)–(D.16)] The flat-phase decoupling rests on the estimate δg_R/g_R = O(ḡ²s), with the statement that the fast region ω∼v_F k “cannot generate an s⁰ logarithm” in the projected local vertex. This is asserted but not demonstrated: the order-g³ vertex correction is not computed, and the slow-flexural expansion (D.11) breaks down precisely in the fast region, where s∼1 and the flexural propagator changes from k⁻⁴ to k⁻². Since eq. (3.24) and the claim γ_g^(ψ)=O(α_e) are load-bearing for the first half of the classification, the authors should either supply an explicit leading calculation of the projected local vertex or clearly state the weaker, robust statement (e.g., what happens if only O(ḡ²) is known; my estimate is that the marginal-log stiffening would still dominate, but this should be said in the paper).
  2. [§2.1 and §6] The model includes only the local trace coupling H_T ρψ; the momentum-projected deformation potential and the shear/pseudogauge valley coupling are explicitly excluded (“not included here”, §2.1), and Γ_der is deferred to a separate composite-operator analysis. Nevertheless the abstract and introduction present a “field-theoretic classification of membrane–Dirac criticality” with no such qualifier. The finite-momentum classification in §§4–5 is vulnerable to the omitted terms: at finite Q the pseudogauge coupling is linear in the ripple amplitude and could generate a symmetry-allowed Yukawa-type coupling not captured by the density coupling in eq. (4.7). The central claim should be reformulated as a classification within the local-scalar sector, or the omitted interactions need to be analyzed, at least by power counting.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.16)–(5.17)] For N_f=N_b=2 and ε=1, Eq. (5.16) gives 1/ν=4/5, i.e. ν=5/4, whereas Eq. (5.17) gives ν=4/5 by substituting ε=1 into the expanded series. This is the usual ε-expansion extrapolation ambiguity, but the text should state explicitly that 4/5 is obtained from the truncated series, not from the fixed-point relation (5.16).
  2. [Appendix B] The full functional derivation of the rotational Ward identity is said to be “not reproduced here.” Since the zero-momentum tension-insertion result is central to §3, it would help to give the complete argument or at least a clearer reference to the original derivation, rather than only a one-loop verification in Appendix D.
  3. [§5.3] The velocity-locking analysis is linearized about ζ=1 and shows stability of the equal-velocity point. The statement that a generic anisotropic state is “expected” to flow to a common terminal velocity is stronger than what is derived; the text should mark this as an expectation based on the isotropic subspace.
  4. [General presentation] There are several typographical issues, including missing spaces (“Hereκ b” in §3.2, “Themixingtherefore” after eq. (5.9), “correspoding” in §5) and inconsistent spacing around cross-references. These should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the classification follows from symmetry, exact scaling relations, and an explicit one-loop calculation that is not merely a self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. In the flat phase (Sec. 3.2), the flow of the local coupling gbar is fixed by the rotational/tension Ward identity (Appendix B, explicitly verified at one loop in Appendix D, eqs. D.6-D.9) and by the independent quantum-membrane RG flow of refs. [22,35,36] (eqs. 3.10-3.14). The fermionic feedback is bounded as gamma_g^(psi) = O(alpha_e) (eq. 3.24), with alpha_e defined in eq. 3.20; this is a power-counting estimate, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The finite-momentum spectator conclusion rests on the exact relation y_lambda = 1/nu - D (eq. 4.8 and Appendix E.1) combined with the external XY exponent nu = 0.672 (ref. [44]); no quantity is fit to the target result. The GNY route (Sec. 5) is justified by a symmetry-matching argument and by an explicit one-loop calculation in Appendix F (eqs. F.1-F.11), with agreement to refs. [48,49,51,54] used only as a benchmark. The self-citations [11,48,52,54] are therefore not load-bearing: the critical exponents and the velocity-locking coefficient omega_zeta = 7*epsilon/36 are rederived in this paper (Appendix F). The only soft point is Appendix D's assertion that the fast region 'cannot generate an s^0 logarithm' in the projected local vertex; this is an unproven power-counting step that could invalidate the flat-phase leg if false, but it is a technical-support gap, not an input-output identity. Hence no circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The classification rests on standard membrane effective theory plus several physics assumptions the paper states explicitly. It introduces no fitted parameters and no invented entities: no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities; the ripple order parameter and Kekulé masses are standard. The decisive inputs are: (i) the rotational Ward identity constraining the tension operator; (ii) the power-counting bound on fermionic vertex corrections (Appendix D), asserted rather than computed; (iii) exact charge neutrality, which removes Landau damping; (iv) the isolated-±Q assumption for the finite-Q analysis; and (v) the irrelevance of the Z₃ clock anisotropy at the chiral-XY fixed point, imported from prior work including a self-cited reference. The paper's own caveats (mirror parity, excluded channels) are weighed in the verdict.

axioms (8)
  • domain assumption The flexural sector is governed by the nonlocal elastic kernel R = μM + YN (eqs. 2.3–2.8); in-plane displacement is integrated out.
    Standard crystalline-membrane effective theory (Nelson–Peliti; Aronovitz–Lubensky; Le Doussal–Radzihovsky), stated in §2.1.
  • domain assumption Rotational Ward identity: no ultraviolet-divergent p² term in the flexural self-energy; the p² tension insertion renormalizes only through field and bending-rigidity factors (Appendix B, eqs. B.5–B.6).
    Standard result for tensionless membranes; the paper verifies it at one loop in Appendix D (eqs. D.6–D.9).
  • ad hoc to paper The fermionic vertex correction is suppressed by at least one power of s = ω_h/(v_F k), with no s⁰ logarithm in the projected local vertex (Appendix D, eqs. D.13–D.16).
    Load-bearing estimate for the flat-phase decoupling; asserted by power counting, not computed explicitly. If false, the asymptotic decoupling claim fails.
  • domain assumption The Dirac fermions are exactly at charge neutrality; the polarization has no |Ω|/|q| Landau-damping term (eq. 3.26, Appendix C).
    Undamped flexural dynamics and the α_e suppression rely on the vanishing density of states at neutrality. The paper notes finite doping crosses over to the Hertz–Millis form (Appendix C).
  • domain assumption A microscopic mechanism produces isolated quadratic minima at ±Q (eq. 4.1); ring degeneracy is lifted before the critical scale (Appendix G).
    The finite-Q classification applies only when lattice anisotropy/commensurability removes the Brazovskii ring; otherwise the transition is fluctuation-driven first-order (classical) or marginally singular (quantum).
  • domain assumption The density coupling λ|Φ_Q|²ρ_ψ is the leading fermionic perturbation when no mass channel matches the ripple quantum numbers (eq. 4.7).
    Power-counting statement; if particle–hole symmetry forbids the density coupling, the remaining local couplings are more irrelevant, so the spectator conclusion is robust.
  • domain assumption For the commensurate Kekulé case, the Z₃ clock anisotropy (eq. 5.2) is irrelevant at the chiral-XY fixed point.
    Imported from prior QMC/RG work (refs [50,52]; ref [52] overlaps with the present authors). The paper itself notes that if the anisotropy is relevant the transition becomes Z₃-controlled or first order.
  • domain assumption Horizontal-reflection parity selection: a pure flexural ripple is σ_h-odd, the Kekulé bond mass is σ_h-even, so the GNY Yukawa coupling requires broken σ_h or a symmetry-compatible bond component.
    Stated by the authors in §5.1; restricts the graphene realization. An honest limitation, not a concealed assumption.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20801 in / 26190 out tokens · 228597 ms · 2026-08-01T01:32:30.238782+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Crystalline membranes hosting Dirac fermions, with graphene as the paradigmatic example, combine two low-energy sectors with sharply different dynamics: nonrelativistic flexural phonons and relativistic-like Dirac quasiparticles. We develop the low-energy field theory of this coupled system at charge neutrality and determine how this dynamical mismatch controls the coupling between the two sectors. In the long-wavelength flat phase, rotational symmetry ties the renormalization of the leading local scalar strain--density coupling to the scale-dependent bending rigidity, causing its dimensionless strength to decrease logarithmically. At the same time, flexural modes become parametrically slower than the Dirac fermions, so the resulting fermionic feedback vanishes as a power law.The flat phase is therefore stable against this perturbation. The physics changes when elastic interactions or electronic softening destabilize the membrane at a finite wavelength, selecting a ripple pattern formed by modes at $\pm\mathbf{Q}$. For an isolated pair of ordering wavevectors, provided that commensurability-induced phase pinning is irrelevant, the transition is governed by the bosonic Wilson--Fisher fixed point, while the Dirac fermions remain spectators. A genuinely hybrid electronic--structural critical point arises instead when symmetry permits a mass-type Dirac bilinear to share the ripple's momentum and quantum numbers, including horizontal-reflection parity. The transition is then described by the chiral-XY Gross--Neveu--Yukawa universality class. Using the known one-loop critical exponents, we characterize this transition, determine the induced secondary elastic distortion, and show that the fermionic and bosonic velocities lock in the isotropic continuum limit.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Castro Neto, F

    A.H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N.M.R. Peres, K.S. Novoselov and A.K. Geim,The electronic properties of graphene,Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 109

    2009

  2. [2]

    Wehling, A.M

    T.O. Wehling, A.M. Black-Schaffer and A.V. Balatsky,Dirac materials,Adv. Phys.63 (2014) 1 [1405.5774]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Armitage, E.J

    N.P. Armitage, E.J. Mele and A. Vishwanath,Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 015001 [1705.01111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Herbut, V

    I.F. Herbut, V. Juričić and B. Roy,Theory of interacting electrons on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B79(2009) 085116 [0811.0610]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Herbut, V

    I.F. Herbut, V. Juričić and O. Vafek,Relativistic mott criticality in graphene,Phys. Rev. B 80(2009) 075432 [0904.1019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Assaad and I.F

    F.F. Assaad and I.F. Herbut,Pinning the order: The nature of quantum criticality in the hubbard model on honeycomb lattice,Phys. Rev. X3(2013) 031010 [1304.6340]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Otsuka, S

    Y. Otsuka, S. Yunoki and S. Sorella,Universal quantum criticality in the metal-insulator transition of two-dimensional interacting dirac electrons,Phys. Rev. X6(2016) 011029 [1510.08593]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, P.X. Nguyen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K.F. Mak et al., Relativistic Mott transition in twisted WSe2 tetralayers,Nature Materials24(2025) 1935

    2025

  9. [9]

    González, F

    J. González, F. Guinea and M.A.H. Vozmediano,Non-fermi liquid behavior of electrons in the half-filled honeycomb lattice,Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 595

    1994

  10. [10]

    Isobe and N

    H. Isobe and N. Nagaosa,Theory of a quantum critical phenomenon in a topological insulator: (3+1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics in solids,Phys. Rev. B86(2012) 165127

    2012

  11. [11]

    B. Roy, V. Juričić and I.F. Herbut,Emergent lorentz symmetry near fermionic quantum critical points in two and three dimensions,JHEP04(2016) 018 [1510.07650]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Roy, M.P

    B. Roy, M.P. Kennett, K. Yang and V. Juričić,From birefringent electrons to a marginal or non-fermi liquid of relativistic spin-1/2fermions: An emergent superuniversality,Physical Review Letters121(2018) 157602 [1802.02134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Reiser and V

    P. Reiser and V. Juričić,Tilted dirac superconductor at quantum criticality: restoration of lorentz symmetry,JHEP02(2024) 181

    2024

  14. [14]

    Mariani and F

    E. Mariani and F. von Oppen,Flexural phonons in free-standing graphene,Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(2008) 076801 [0707.4350]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Katsnelson and A

    M.I. Katsnelson and A. Fasolino,Graphene as a prototype crystalline membrane,Acc. Chem. Res.46(2013) 97

    2013

  16. [16]

    Nelson and L

    D.R. Nelson and L. Peliti,Fluctuations in membranes with crystalline and hexatic order,J. Phys. France48(1987) 1085

    1987

  17. [17]

    Aronovitz and T.C

    J.A. Aronovitz and T.C. Lubensky,Fluctuations of solid membranes,Phys. Rev. Lett.60 (1988) 2634

    1988

  18. [18]

    Le Doussal and L

    P. Le Doussal and L. Radzihovsky,Self-consistent theory of polymerized membranes,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1209. – 27 –

    1992

  19. [19]

    Kownacki and D

    J.-P. Kownacki and D. Mouhanna,Crumpling transition and flat phase of polymerized phantom membranes,Phys. Rev. E79(2009) 040101

    2009

  20. [20]

    Coquand, D

    O. Coquand, D. Mouhanna and S. Teber,Flat phase of polymerized membranes at two-loop order,Phys. Rev. E101(2020) 062104

    2020

  21. [21]

    Metayer and S

    S. Metayer and S. Teber,Field-theory approach to flat polymerized membranes,J. Stat. Mech.2025(2025) 092001 [2412.18490]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Mauri and M.I

    A. Mauri and M.I. Katsnelson,Perturbative renormalization and thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes,Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 195434 [2202.12842]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Nelson, T

    D.R. Nelson, T. Piran and S. Weinberg, eds.,Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces, World Scientific, Singapore, 2 ed. (2004), 10.1142/5473

    doi:10.1142/5473 2004

  24. [24]

    Le Doussal and L

    P. Le Doussal and L. Radzihovsky,Anomalous elasticity, fluctuations and disorder in elastic membranes,Ann. Phys.392(2018) 340 [1708.05723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    González and E

    J. González and E. Perfetto,Many-body effects on out-of-plane phonons in graphene,New J. Phys.11(2009) 095015 [0906.4969]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    San-Jose, J

    P. San-Jose, J. González and F. Guinea,Electron-induced rippling in graphene,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 045502 [1009.4588]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [27]

    González,Rippling transition from electron-induced condensation of curvature field in graphene,Phys

    J. González,Rippling transition from electron-induced condensation of curvature field in graphene,Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 165402 [1407.7545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Guinea, P

    F. Guinea, P. Le Doussal and K.J. Wiese,Collective excitations in a large-dmodel for graphene,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 125428

    2014

  29. [29]

    Bowick and A

    M.J. Bowick and A. Travesset,The statistical mechanics of membranes,Phys. Rep.344 (2001) 255 [cond-mat/0002038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Gazit,Structure of physical crystalline membranes within the self-consistent screening approximation,Phys

    D. Gazit,Structure of physical crystalline membranes within the self-consistent screening approximation,Phys. Rev. E80(2009) 041117

    2009

  31. [31]

    Mauri and M.I

    A. Mauri and M.I. Katsnelson,Scaling behavior of crystalline membranes: Anϵ-expansion approach,Nucl. Phys. B956(2020) 115040

    2020

  32. [32]

    Roldán, A

    R. Roldán, A. Fasolino, K.V. Zakharchenko and M.I. Katsnelson,Suppression of anharmonicities in crystalline membranes by external strain,Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 174104

    2011

  33. [33]

    Burmistrov, I.V

    I.S. Burmistrov, I.V. Gornyi, V.Y. Kachorovskii, M.I. Katsnelson, J.H. Los and A.D. Mirlin, Stress-controlled poisson ratio of a crystalline membrane: Application to graphene,Phys. Rev. B97(2018) 125402 [1801.05476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Burmistrov, V.Y

    I.S. Burmistrov, V.Y. Kachorovskii, I.V. Gornyi and A.D. Mirlin,Differential poisson’s ratio of a crystalline two-dimensional membrane,Ann. Phys.396(2018) 119 [1801.05053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Kats and V.V

    E.I. Kats and V.V. Lebedev,Asymptotic freedom at zero temperature in free-standing crystalline membranes,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 125433

    2014

  36. [36]

    Amorim, R

    B. Amorim, R. Roldán, E. Cappelluti, A. Fasolino, F. Guinea and M.I. Katsnelson, Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 224307 [1403.2635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    Peskin and D.V

    M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1995). – 28 –

    1995

  38. [38]

    Wunsch, T

    B. Wunsch, T. Stauber, F. Sols and F. Guinea,Dynamical polarization of graphene at finite doping,New J. Phys.8(2006) 318 [cond-mat/0610630]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Hwang and S

    E.H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma,Dielectric function, screening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene,Phys. Rev. B75(2007) 205418

    2007

  40. [40]

    McMillan,Theory of discommensurations and the commensurate-incommensurate charge-density-wave phase transition,Phys

    W.L. McMillan,Theory of discommensurations and the commensurate-incommensurate charge-density-wave phase transition,Phys. Rev. B14(1976) 1496

    1976

  41. [41]

    Bak,Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase,Rep

    P. Bak,Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase,Rep. Prog. Phys.45(1982) 587

    1982

  42. [42]

    Brazovskii,Phase transition of an isotropic system to a nonuniform state,Sov

    S.A. Brazovskii,Phase transition of an isotropic system to a nonuniform state,Sov. Phys. JETP41(1975) 85

    1975

  43. [43]

    Swift and P.C

    J. Swift and P.C. Hohenberg,Hydrodynamic fluctuations at the convective instability,Phys. Rev. A15(1977) 319

    1977

  44. [44]

    Campostrini, M

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari,The critical exponents of the superfluid transition in4he,Phys. Rev. B74(2006) 144506 [cond-mat/0605083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  45. [45]

    Otsuka, K

    Y. Otsuka, K. Seki, S. Sorella and S. Yunoki,Quantum criticality in the metal-superconductor transition of interacting Dirac fermions on a triangular lattice,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 035126 [1803.02001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Li, Z.-X

    B.-H. Li, Z.-X. Li and H. Yao,Fermion-induced quantum critical point in Dirac semimetals: A sign-problem-free quantum Monte Carlo study,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 085105 [1910.14287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Y. Liu, W. Wang, K. Sun and Z.Y. Meng,Designer Monte Carlo simulation for the Gross–Neveu–Yukawa transition,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 064308 [1910.07430]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    B. Roy, V. Juričić and I.F. Herbut,Quantum superconducting criticality in graphene and topological insulators,Phys. Rev. B87(2013) 041401 [1210.3576]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, I.R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky,Yukawa conformal field theories and emergent supersymmetry,Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2016(2016) 12C105 [1607.05316]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Li, Y.-F

    Z.-X. Li, Y.-F. Jiang, S.-K. Jian and H. Yao,Fermion-induced quantum critical points,Nat. Commun.8(2017) 314 [1512.07908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Zerf, C.-H

    N. Zerf, C.-H. Lin and J. Maciejko,Superconducting quantum criticality of topological surface states at three loops,Phys. Rev. B94(2016) 205106 [1605.09423]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Roy and V

    B. Roy and V. Juričić,Fermionic multicriticality near kekulé valence-bond ordering on a honeycomb lattice,Phys. Rev. B99(2019) 241103(R)

    2019

  53. [53]

    C.-Y. Hou, C. Chamon and C. Mudry,Electron fractionalization in two-dimensional graphenelike structures,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 186809 [cond-mat/0609740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Roy and V

    B. Roy and V. Juričić,Strain-induced time-reversal odd superconductivity in graphene,Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 041413(R)

    2014

  55. [55]

    Gracey,Critical exponentηato(1/n 3)in the chiral XY model using the large-n conformal bootstrap,Phys

    J.A. Gracey,Critical exponentηato(1/n 3)in the chiral XY model using the large-n conformal bootstrap,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 065018 [2101.03385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Gracey, A

    J.A. Gracey, A. Maier, P. Marquard and Y. Schröder,Anomalous dimensions and critical exponents for the Gross–Neveu–Yukawa model at five loops,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 085029 [2507.22594]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Vozmediano, M.I

    M.A.H. Vozmediano, M.I. Katsnelson and F. Guinea,Gauge fields in graphene,Phys. Rep. 496(2010) 109 [1003.5179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Mañes,Symmetry-based approach to electron-phonon interactions in graphene,Phys

    J.L. Mañes,Symmetry-based approach to electron-phonon interactions in graphene,Phys. Rev. B76(2007) 045430

    2007

  59. [59]

    Guinea, B

    F. Guinea, B. Horovitz and P. Le Doussal,Gauge field induced by ripples in graphene,Phys. Rev. B77(2008) 205421

    2008

  60. [60]

    Guinea, M.I

    F. Guinea, M.I. Katsnelson and A.K. Geim,Energy gaps and a zero-field quantum hall effect in graphene by strain engineering,Nat. Phys.6(2010) 30

    2010

  61. [61]

    Aronovitz, L

    J.A. Aronovitz, L. Golubović and T.C. Lubensky,Fluctuations and lower critical dimensions of crystalline membranes,J. Phys. France50(1989) 609

    1989

  62. [62]

    Guitter, F

    E. Guitter, F. David, S. Leibler and L. Peliti,Thermodynamical behavior of polymerized membranes,J. Phys. France50(1989) 1787

    1989

  63. [63]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 4 ed

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 4 ed. (2002). – 30 –

    2002