Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

The paper claims that one D=5 N=8 supergravity—obtained by consistent truncation of D=11 supergravity on every wrapped-M5 six-manifold in the family—determines the complete U(1)_0-invariant Kaluza-Klein spectrum of the MN1 vacuum, and that

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 01:00 UTC pith:UDZSWZKN

load-bearing objection Real new truncation results, but the headline MN1 spectrum rests on an unproved U(1)_0 selection rule that the paper should either prove or check independently. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25952 v1 pith:UDZSWZKN submitted 2026-07-28 hep-th

Maximal D=5 trombone supergravity from M5-branes and SU(2)-flavoured mathcal{N}=1 class mathcal{S} operator spectra

Ritabrata Bhattacharya , Abhay Katyal , Oscar Varela This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords consistent truncationKaluza-Klein spectrumtrombone gaugingM5-branesclass S SCFTexceptional generalised geometryAdS5/CFT4superconformal multiplets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper attempts to establish that a single five-dimensional N=8 supergravity with a gauged trombone scaling symmetry—a reduction that retains a finite set of fields while exactly capturing their dynamics—arises from D=11 supergravity on every member of the family of M5-brane-wrapped solutions, not only at the N=2 endpoint. On the N=1 (MN1) vacuum, it determines the complete sector of Kaluza-Klein modes (the tower of massive modes from expanding on the internal space) that are invariant under a globally defined U(1)_0 symmetry and constant on the Riemann surface. All such modes are shown to organise into infinite towers of graviton, gravitino and vector multiplets whose conformal dimensions are given by one closed expression with exact multiplicities. If correct, this supplies operator-level data—dimensions, R-charges, flavour representations—for a universal sector of the light single-trace operator spectrum of the strongly coupled N=1 class-S SCFT dual to MN1, going beyond coarse protected information such as central charges and superconformal indices.

Core claim

The central claim is that D=11 supergravity admits a maximally supersymmetric consistent truncation on every twisted six-manifold Σ2 ⋊_{p,q} S4 of the wrapped-M5 family, and that in all cases the lower-dimensional theory is the same D=5 N=8 TCSO(5,0,1;1)-gauged supergravity, with the twisting integers p,q encoded in the duality frame. Specialising to the z=0 (MN1) vacuum, the paper determines the complete U(1)_0-invariant, Σ2-constant universal Kaluza-Klein spectrum at all levels: towers of SU(2,2|1)×SU(2)_+ graviton, gravitino and vector multiplets whose superconformal-primary dimensions are all given by E_{kℓnj1j2}=1+sqrt(7−2j1(j1+1)−2j2(j2+1)+3k(k+3)+(3/4)n^2−3ℓ(ℓ+1)), with multiplicities

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the constant-torsion generalised identity structure on B2×S4—a generalised parallelisation built from the ordinary parallelisation of the non-compact group manifold B2 and the generalised parallelisation of the four-sphere—together with its twisted version on Σ2 ⋊_{p,q} S4 obtained by a local E6(6) transformation that implements the topological twist. Flattening this twist reproduces a constant duality transformation of the embedding tensor, which is why the same D=5 theory appears for all p,q. The spectral computation then uses the trombone-augmented Kaluza-Klein mass matrices evaluated at the MN1 vacuum, with U(1)_0 invariance as the selection rule that promotes

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the U(1)_0-selection rule, verified directly for the graviton tower, also correctly identifies the globally defined modes in the gravitino and vector towers; if those towers contain modes that fail to patch globally, or omit modes that do patch, the complete-spectrum statement would be wrong.

What would settle it

Compute the gravitino and vector mass eigenvalues at a low KK level, say k=1, directly from the eleven-dimensional fluctuation equations on the MN1 background, and compare with the U(1)_0-selected values in table 1 (e.g. the E=9/2 gravitino). A mismatch, or a demonstration that the selected mode violates the automorphic transition law (D.17)–(D.19), would falsify the global-spectrum claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every wrapped-M5 AdS5 vacuum in the family—including the N=1 MN1 and N=2 MN2 endpoints—shares the same D=5 N=8 TCSO(5,0,1;1) supergravity as a local consistent truncation; the twist integers enter only through the duality frame.
  • The MN1 Kaluza-Klein spectrum at arbitrary level is organised into SU(2,2|1)×SU(2)_+ multiplets with all dimensions given by one closed formula and exact multiplicities (4.9)–(4.11).
  • The global spectrum contains the stress-tensor multiplet and the SU(2)_+ flavour-current multiplet at k=0, plus protected gravitino multiplets and infinite long towers.
  • Holographically, these modes correspond to a universal, Σ2-independent sector of the light single-trace operator spectrum of the N=1 MN1 class-S SCFT.
  • The construction recovers previously known submaximal truncations as U(1)_z-invariant subsectors and reproduces the explicit MN1 and generic family metrics from the five-dimensional vacuum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same duality-frame machinery applied at generic z should produce z-dependent dimension formulae for the other wrapped-M5 vacua; the structure of (4.6) suggests the twist parameter will enter inside the square root through the R-charge combination.
  • U(1)_0 invariance is a sufficient condition for global definiteness, not a necessary one; the weighted-Maass sector for n≠0 may contribute additional physical modes whose masses depend on the genus of Σ2, and completing those multiplets is a concrete test of the universal-sector claim.
  • The equivalence between the ExGG topological twist and a constant duality transformation suggests that other trombone-gauged truncations on non-compact group manifolds may admit the same 'twist equals duality frame' dictionary, providing a shortcut for future wrapped-brane spectra.
  • The single square-root dimension formula hints at an underlying BPS-type or integrable organisation of the universal sector; a superconformal-index computation on the MN1 side could check whether the protected states in these towers saturate the corresponding index contributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the D=5 N=8 TCSO(5,0,1;1)-gauged supergravity introduced in [12,14] arises as a maximally supersymmetric consistent truncation of D=11 supergravity on every BBBW twisted geometry Σ2 ⋊_{p,q} S4, with the twist encoded in a duality frame. Using exceptional generalised geometry, the authors construct a local generalised identity structure, verify its constant intrinsic torsion in Appendix B, and uplift the U(1)_z-invariant subsectors to the BBBW and MN1 metrics. For the MN1 endpoint, they use the trombone mass matrices of [15] to compute a 'putative' KK spectrum and then extract a U(1)_0-invariant, Σ2-constant sector, claiming it is globally defined and organises into SU(2,2|1)×SU(2)_+ graviton, gravitino and vector multiplets with dimensions given by (4.6)–(4.11). The direct D=11 graviton analysis in Appendix D independently reproduces the graviton tower and shows that additional non-singlet modes are controlled by weighted Maass operators.

Significance. If correct, the result characterises an infinite universal sector of the light single-trace operator spectrum of the N=1 MN1 SCFT with no fitted parameters: the spectrum follows from the embedding tensor and algebraic mass matrices, and the explicit generalized-frame checks in Appendix B plus the direct graviton analysis in Appendix D are concrete and valuable. The construction of a common maximal supergravity origin for the whole BBBW family is also significant. However, the global-spectrum claim for the non-graviton towers rests on an unverified selection rule, and the diagonalization leading to (4.6) is not shown, so the central spectral result is not yet fully supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, §4.2 and Appendix D, Eqs. (D.16)–(D.19)] The central claim that the U(1)_0-invariant spectrum (4.9)–(4.11) is globally defined and Σ2-constant is established by direct D=11 computation only for the graviton tower. Appendix D explicitly states that the graviton conclusion 'must not be applied unchanged' to other spin towers and prescribes selecting U(1)_0 singlets in r⊗[k0], but no D=11-level derivation is given for the gravitino and vector towers. Concretely, a seed field with U(1)_0 charge q_seed can satisfy q_seed + n/2 = 0 with n≠0; for n≠0, the patching relations (D.18)–(D.19) show that a constant coefficient is not a global section, and the mode would live in a nontrivial automorphic line bundle rather than in the Σ2-constant sector. Without ruling this out, the 'complete' global spectrum claim is not proven.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C.5), and §4.1, Eq. (4.6)] The new tensor mass matrix (C.5) is introduced without derivation, and the all-level dimension formula (4.6) is stated as the outcome of a diagonalization that is not shown. Since (4.6) is the principal spectral result and (C.5) is used in the computation of the KK spectrum, the manuscript should provide the derivation of (C.5) and at least an outline of the diagonalization, or make the mass eigenvalues available in an ancillary file.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §2.3] The abstract says the supergravity 'arises by consistent truncation' on the BBBW family, while §3.1 clarifies that the generalised identity structure is only locally defined because the construction uses the non-compact group manifold B_2. The abstract and conclusion should qualify this as a local consistent truncation to avoid overstating the global status.
  2. [Eq. (2.22)] The index structure in (2.22) appears to have a repeated M/N typo; please check that the flattened duality transformation is written with correct raised and lowered indices.
  3. [Eq. (4.3)] The factor of R in the commutator [T_M, T_N] = -R X_{[MN]}^P T_P may be dimensionally inconsistent; please verify whether it should be R^{-1} or whether R is defined with a different normalisation.
  4. [Appendix D, around Eq. (D.16)] The caveat that the graviton identification of U(1)_0 with n/2 'must not be applied unchanged' to other towers is crucial for the main spectral claim. This caveat should appear in §4.1 rather than only in the appendix, since it directly qualifies the validity of the global spectrum presented in the main text.
  5. [Tables 1 and 2] The large tables of spectra are helpful, but they are difficult to read in print. Consider moving the full tables to supplementary material or presenting only the closed-form multiplicities in the main text, with the tables as an explicit low-level check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: the MN1 spectrum is computed from parameter-free mass matrices with an independent graviton check, and the self-citations are to general constructions, not to the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central spectral claim, Eqs. (4.6)-(4.11), is obtained by diagonalizing the trombone-enhanced KK mass matrices of Appendix C at the MN1 vacuum (3.14). No parameter is fitted to the MN1 spectrum, and the mass matrices are stated in full in the paper, making the computation self-contained rather than reliant on an unverified self-citation. The graviton tower is independently reproduced in Appendix D from the eleven-dimensional graviton equation, providing an external check that the mass-matrix framework is not merely encoding its own output. The gravitino and vector towers are selected by the U(1)_0-singlet prescription, and the paper itself flags in Appendix D that the graviton conclusion must not be applied unchanged to other spin towers; this is an unproven global-extension assumption, a correctness risk rather than a circular step, because the selection rule is not defined in terms of the final spectrum. Self-citations to [12], [14], and [15] supply the D=5 theory and general mass-matrix formalism, both of which are parameter-free and were derived for broader contexts; they do not presuppose the MN1 spectrum. The recovery of the BBBW and MN1 metrics and the k=0 match with [28] are consistency checks, not circular inputs. No step in the derivation chain reduces by definition to its own inputs, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. The 'trombone' symmetry and the generalised structures are imported from prior work; the 'putative spectrum' is an interpretive label, not an entity. The main burden falls on imported mass matrices and on the ad hoc U(1)_0 selection rule for global modes.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The constant-intrinsic-torsion generalised identity structure criterion guarantees a maximal consistent truncation.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 to infer the D=11 truncation from the frame condition (2.10); relies on the ExFT framework and [33].
  • domain assumption The KK trombone mass matrices of [15] (and [16-19]) give the correct physical masses after Goldstone-mode removal.
    Used in Section 4.1 and Appendix C; the paper imports them wholesale and adds one new tensor mass matrix (C.5) without derivation.
  • domain assumption The generalised U(1)_z structures of [27,28] are globally defined on the BBBW/MN1 bundles and embed in USp(8) as in (3.1).
    Assumed in Sections 3.2 and 4.1; global definiteness of the U(1)_0 structure is the basis for selecting the global sector.
  • ad hoc to paper U(1)_0 invariance of a putative mode with constant Σ2 coefficients is sufficient for it to extend globally over every MN1 bundle.
    This is the paper's prescription in Section 4.1; it is proved directly only for the graviton tower in Appendix D and extrapolated to other towers.
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT: KK states on AdS5×MN1 correspond to single-trace operators of the dual SCFT.
    Standard dictionary [20-22], used in Sections 1 and 5 to translate the KK spectrum into an operator spectrum.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 36106 in / 13278 out tokens · 126479 ms · 2026-08-01T01:00:18.753783+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We recently presented a new $D=5$ $\mathcal{N}=8$ gauged supergravity involving the local trombone scaling symmetry. It arises by consistent truncation of M-theory on the internal space of the Maldacena-N\'u\~nez AdS$_5$ solution dual to the $\mathcal{N}=2$ four-dimensional superconformal field theory (SCFT) of class $\mathcal{S}$ associated to M5-branes wrapped on an unpunctured Riemann surface. Using exceptional generalised geometry/field theory, we extend that construction to show that the same $D=5$ $\mathcal{N}=8$ supergravity also arises by consistent truncation of $D=11$ supergravity on the family of $\mathcal{N}=1$ M5-brane-wrapped solutions of Bah-Beem-Bobev-Wecht, including the $\mathcal{N}=1$ Maldacena-N\'u\~nez (MN1) configuration. Then, using recently derived mass matrices, we compute universal sectors of the Kaluza-Klein spectrum on the MN1 solution. In general, this universal spectrum is only locally defined, and we give a prescription for extracting globally defined subsectors thereof. This globally defined universal Kaluza-Klein spectrum is dual to a universal sector of the light operator spectrum of the SU(2)-flavoured $\mathcal{N}=1$ class $\mathcal{S}$ SCFT dual to MN1.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 43 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Benini, Y

    F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa, and B. Wecht,Sicilian gauge theories and N=1 dualities, JHEP01(2010) 088, [arXiv:0909.1327]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev, and B. Wecht,AdS/CFT Dual Pairs from M5-Branes on Riemann Surfaces,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 121901, [arXiv:1112.5487]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev, and B. Wecht,Four-Dimensional SCFTs from M5-Branes,JHEP06(2012) 005, [arXiv:1203.0303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822–855, [hep-th/0007018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034, [arXiv:0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034, [arXiv:0904.2715]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Maldacena,The Gravity duals of N=2 superconformal field theories,JHEP10(2012) 189, [arXiv:0904.4466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and R. Minasian,Discrete and higher-form symmetries in SCFTs from wrapped M5-branes,JHEP03(2021) 196, [arXiv:2007.15003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Baggio, N

    M. Baggio, N. Halmagyi, D. R. Mayerson, D. Robbins, and B. Wecht,Higher Derivative Corrections and Central Charges from Wrapped M5-branes,JHEP12 (2014) 042, [arXiv:1408.2538]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Beem and A

    C. Beem and A. Gadde,TheN= 1superconformal index for classSfixed points, JHEP04(2014) 036, [arXiv:1212.1467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Bobev, V

    N. Bobev, V. Dimitrov, and A. Vekemans,Wrapped M5-branes and AdS 5 black holes,JHEP05(2023) 012, [arXiv:2212.10360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    David and A

    M. David and A. Vekemans,Microstates of AdS 5 black holes with hypermultiplets, JHEP07(2025) 148, [arXiv:2502.10372]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Bhattacharya, A

    R. Bhattacharya, A. Katyal, and O. Varela,Class S Superconformal Indices from Maximal Supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 18 181601, [arXiv:2411.16837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Bhattacharya, A

    R. Bhattacharya, A. Katyal, and O. Varela,In progress,

  14. [14]

    Varela,Trombone gaugings of five-dimensional maximal supergravity,JHEP02 (2026) 163, [arXiv:2509.12391]

    O. Varela,Trombone gaugings of five-dimensional maximal supergravity,JHEP02 (2026) 163, [arXiv:2509.12391]

    arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Pico and O

    M. Pico and O. Varela,Kaluza-Klein trombone mass matrices and universal classR operator spectra,JHEP07(2026) 19, [arXiv:2603.28908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Malek and H

    E. Malek and H. Samtleben,Kaluza-Klein Spectrometry for Supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 10 101601, [arXiv:1911.12640]. 36

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Malek and H

    E. Malek and H. Samtleben,Kaluza-Klein Spectrometry from Exceptional Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 10 106016, [arXiv:2009.03347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Varela,Super-Chern-Simons spectra from Exceptional Field Theory,JHEP04 (2021) 283, [arXiv:2010.09743]

    O. Varela,Super-Chern-Simons spectra from Exceptional Field Theory,JHEP04 (2021) 283, [arXiv:2010.09743]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Ces` aro and O

    M. Ces` aro and O. Varela,Kaluza-Klein fermion mass matrices from exceptional field theory andN= 1 spectra,JHEP03(2021) 138, [arXiv:2012.05249]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113–1133, [hep-th/9711200]. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  21. [21]

    Gubser, I

    S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Exceptional Form of D=11 Supergravity,Phys.Rev.Lett. 111(2013) 231601, [arXiv:1308.1673]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Exceptional Field Theory I:E 6(6) covariant Form of M-Theory and Type IIB,Phys. Rev.D89(2014), no. 6 066016, [arXiv:1312.0614]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Coimbra, C

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram,E d(d) ×R + generalised geometry, connections and M theory,JHEP02(2014) 054, [arXiv:1112.3989]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Coimbra, C

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram,Supergravity as Generalised Geometry II:E d(d) ×R + and M theory,JHEP03(2014) 019, [arXiv:1212.1586]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Cassani, G

    D. Cassani, G. Josse, M. Petrini, and D. Waldram,Systematics of consistent truncations from generalised geometry,JHEP11(2019) 017, [arXiv:1907.06730]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Cassani, G

    D. Cassani, G. Josse, M. Petrini, and D. Waldram,N= 2 consistent truncations from wrapped M5-branes,JHEP02(2021) 232, [arXiv:2011.04775]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Josse, M

    G. Josse, M. Petrini, and M. Pico,Consistent Truncations and Generalised Geometry: Scanning through Dimensions and Supersymmetry,arXiv:2512.03027

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Cremmer, J

    E. Cremmer, J. Scherk, and J. H. Schwarz,Spontaneously Broken N=8 Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B84(1979) 83–86

    1979

  31. [31]

    de Wit, H

    B. de Wit, H. Samtleben, and M. Trigiante,The Maximal D=5 supergravities,Nucl. Phys.B716(2005) 215–247, [hep-th/0412173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Le Diffon and H

    A. Le Diffon and H. Samtleben,Supergravities without an Action: Gauging the Trombone,Nucl. Phys. B811(2009) 1–35, [arXiv:0809.5180]. 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    K. Lee, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram,Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations,Fortsch. Phys.65(2017), no. 10-11 1700048, [arXiv:1401.3360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    D. S. Berman, E. T. Musaev, and D. C. Thompson,Duality Invariant M-theory: Gauged supergravities and Scherk-Schwarz reductions,JHEP10(2012) 174, [arXiv:1208.0020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Scherk and J

    J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz,How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B153(1979) 61–88

    1979

  36. [36]

    Cremmer, B

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Scherk,Supergravity Theory in 11 Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B76(1978) 409–412

    1978

  37. [37]

    Witten,Topological Quantum Field Theory,Commun

    E. Witten,Topological Quantum Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.117(1988) 353

    1988

  38. [38]

    Bershadsky, C

    M. Bershadsky, C. Vafa, and V. Sadov,D-branes and topological field theories,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 420–434, [hep-th/9511222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  39. [39]

    Pico and O

    M. Pico and O. Varela,Maximal trombone supergravity from wrapped M5-branes, JHEP05(2026) 076, [arXiv:2601.07960]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions,Phys.Rev.D76(2007) 126007, [arXiv:0707.2315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    K. C. Matthew Cheung, J. P. Gauntlett, and C. Rosen,Consistent KK truncations for M5-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 22 225003, [arXiv:1906.08900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    A. F. Faedo, C. Nunez, and C. Rosen,Consistent truncations of supergravity and 1 2 -BPS RG flows in4dSCFTs,JHEP03(2020) 080, [arXiv:1912.13516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Szepietowski,Comments on a-maximization from gauged supergravity,JHEP12 (2012) 018, [arXiv:1209.3025]

    P. Szepietowski,Comments on a-maximization from gauged supergravity,JHEP12 (2012) 018, [arXiv:1209.3025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,D=5 SU(2) x U(1) Gauged Supergravity from D=11 Supergravity,JHEP02(2008) 083, [arXiv:0712.3560]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Pico and O

    M. Pico and O. Varela,Consistent subsectors of maximal supergravity and wrapped M5-branes,JHEP05(2026) 003, [arXiv:2511.15892]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator,Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions,JHEP03(2019) 163, [arXiv:1612.00809]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan,Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 147–193, [arXiv:1110.3740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Ciceri, B

    F. Ciceri, B. de Wit, and O. Varela,IIB supergravity and the E 6(6) covariant vector-tensor hierarchy,JHEP1504(2015) 094, [arXiv:1412.8297]. 38

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    D. S. Berman, C. D. A. Blair, and R. Otsuki,Non-Riemannian geometry of M-theory,JHEP07(2019) 175, [arXiv:1902.01867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Bachas and J

    C. Bachas and J. Estes,Spin-2 spectrum of defect theories,JHEP06(2011) 005, [arXiv:1103.2800]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    Elstrodt,Die Resolvente zum Eigenwertproblem der automorphen Formen in der hyperbolischen Ebene

    J. Elstrodt,Die Resolvente zum Eigenwertproblem der automorphen Formen in der hyperbolischen Ebene. Teil I,Math. Ann.203(1973), no. 4 295–330

    1973

  52. [52]

    Shimura,Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Automorphic Functions, vol

    G. Shimura,Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Automorphic Functions, vol. 11 ofPublications of the Mathematical Society of Japan. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971. 39

    1971