Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

AV2X2O altermagnets host mirror-protected, spin-polarized nodal-line fermions whose Fermi-level isolation is controlled by in-plane vs out-of-plane hopping asymmetry.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Mirror-protected spin-valley-locked nodal lines in AV2X2O d-wave altermagnets can be isolated at the Fermi level by tuning V-O vs V-Te hopping anisotropy.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid symmetry analysis and a falsifiable monolayer prediction, but the magnetic order in the freestanding layer is assumed, not checked. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26150 v2 pith:IYYI2QQV submitted 2026-07-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Isolation of spin-valley locked nodal-line fermions in d-wave AV₂X₂O altermagnets

Pritesh Srivastava , Rahul Verma , Bahadur Singh This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.20.-b71.70.Ej
keywords altermagnetismnodal-line fermionsspin-valley lockingmirror symmetryAV2X2Od-wavetight-binding model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that layered AV2X2O altermagnets host coexisting spin-degenerate and spin-polarized nodal lines near the Fermi level. The spin-polarized lines are protected by the out-of-plane mirror symmetry Mz and survive spin-orbit coupling. A minimal tight-binding model traces their origin to the asymmetry between in-plane V-O and out-of-plane V-Te hopping, which sets the dxy spin splitting. At a critical value of this anisotropy, the spin-valley-locked nodal line becomes isolated at the Fermi level. Layer engineering and correlation tuning provide material-specific routes to realize this state, making the family a platform for spin-valley locking without net magnetization.

Core claim

In bulk RbV2Te2O, the low-energy bands form three nodal structures per spin sector: a spinless nodal line (SL1), a type-II nodal surface from opposite-spin dxy crossings (SL2), and a spin-polarized nodal line (SP1). SP1 and SL2 are protected by opposite mirror eigenvalues under Mz and survive SOC; SL1 is gapped under SOC. The spin-polarized lines reverse polarization between C4z-related valleys, giving C-paired spin-valley-locked fermions. A four-orbital tight-binding model shows the dxy spin splitting is controlled by the V-O versus V-Te hopping asymmetry; at a critical anisotropy, the splitting reverses and SP1 is isolated at the Fermi level.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the out-of-plane mirror symmetry Mz and a hopping-anisotropy parameter λ. Mz assigns mirror eigenvalues ±1 (without SOC) or ±i (with SOC); opposite eigenvalues forbid hybridization, protecting SP1 and SL2. λ rescales the in-plane V-O-V and out-of-plane V-Te-V hopping amplitudes in the four-orbital tight-binding model; at λc = 0.025 eV it reverses the dxy spin splitting, shifting SP1 to the Fermi level and separating it from spinless nodal lines.

Load-bearing premise

The argument collapses if the real magnetic ground state is not the assumed collinear [001] d-wave antiferromagnet, or if removing Rb layers destabilizes that order.

What would settle it

Spin-resolved photoemission on freestanding V2Te2O showing no spin-polarized nodal line at the Fermi level, or a full 3D calculation finding gaps larger than a few meV on the Mz-invariant planes for SP1, would contradict the central claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Spin-resolved ARPES on freestanding V2Te2O or Rb-desorbed surfaces should observe a spin-polarized nodal line at the Fermi level.
  • Mirror protection should keep SP1 gapless under SOC, preserving drumhead states and transport signatures.
  • Layer engineering or U tuning reverses the dxy splitting, offering a switch between spin-valley locking regimes.
  • Coexisting spinless and spin-polarized lines create an energy window for isolated spin-valley locking, enhancing Berry-curvature-driven responses.
  • Chemical substitution in the AV2X2O family adjusts the nodal structure while preserving Mz protection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hopping-anisotropy mechanism is generic, other d-wave altermagnets with the same inverse Lieb lattice may also isolate spin-polarized nodal lines via strain or heterostructuring.
  • Strain or a perpendicular electric field should drive the dxy splitting through zero and gap SP1, providing a testable electrical control.
  • Broken Mz in an asymmetric slab should convert SP1 into Weyl points except on the boundary, enabling a topological phase toggle.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the layered d-wave altermagnets AV2X2O (A = Rb, Cs, K; X = Te, Se, S) host C4z-paired spin-valley-locked nodal-line fermions. Using DFT+U and a minimal four-orbital tight-binding model, the authors identify coexisting spin-degenerate (SL1, SL2) and spin-polarized (SP1) nodal lines near the Fermi level. They show that SL1 is gapped by SOC while SP1 and SL2 remain protected by the out-of-plane mirror symmetry Mz. A hopping-anisotropy parameter λ is introduced to explain the microscopic origin and to propose a design principle: tuning the in-plane V–O vs out-of-plane V–Te hopping asymmetry can isolate the spin-polarized nodal line at the Fermi level. Layer-engineering calculations (Rb-symmetric slab, Rb-asymmetric slab, freestanding V2Te2O monolayer) are presented as a material realization, with the monolayer predicted to host the isolated nodal line.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a compelling design principle for realizing spin-valley-locked nodal-line fermions in compensated altermagnets, a topic of current interest in spintronics and topological materials. The strengths of the paper are the clear symmetry analysis (Mz mirror eigenvalues, C4z pairing), the standard DFT+U workflow, the construction of a minimal model that identifies a specific microscopic mechanism, and the inclusion of independent DFT calculations for different layer geometries, which partially breaks the circularity of the λ tuning. The predicted monolayer nodal line is a concrete, falsifiable experimental target. However, the robustness of the central prediction hinges on assumptions about the monolayer's magnetic order and on the quantitative link between the model parameter λ and real structural distortions, which are not fully established in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Layer engineering (Fig. 5) and Methods] The central prediction of an isolated spin-valley-polarized nodal line in the freestanding V2Te2O monolayer (Fig. 5III) rests on the assumption that the monolayer retains the bulk collinear [001] Néel order. The paper reports this order for bulk RbV2Te2O but does not provide a magnetic ground-state search for the monolayer — no in-plane ([100]/[110]) orientations, non-collinear states, or U-dependence are tested. For an in-plane Néel vector, Mz would reverse the spin and be broken, removing the mirror-eigenvalue protection of SP1. Given that the monolayer has different bond lengths and reduced coordination, and Ueff = 1 eV is modest, the magnetic anisotropy may change. The authors should verify the collinear [001] ground state of the monolayer, or at minimum demonstrate the robustness of the nodal line to plausible moment orientations.
  2. [Microscopic origin (Fig. 4 and phase diagram)] The λ parameter in the tight-binding model is introduced ad hoc and its functional form (t1y(λ)=t1y+λ, t1x(λ)=t1x−λ, ϵxy(λ)=(1+cλ)ϵxy) is not derived from any microscopic quantity. The phase diagram in Fig. 4d is a fitting demonstration: λ is varied until the desired reversal of dxy spin splitting and Fermi-level alignment are obtained. Although the independent DFT calculations in Fig. 5 provide supportive evidence, the paper does not extract λ from Wannier fits for the three structures (I, II, III) to validate the model's predictive power. The authors should either explicitly state that λ is a toy-model parameter and not a quantitative prediction, or provide first-principles values of λ for the slab/monolayer geometries to strengthen the design-principle claim.
  3. [Nodal surfaces and 3D gaps (Fig. 3 and text)] The text states that away from the mirror planes kz=0 and π/c, the quasi-two-dimensional electronic structure 'limits the resulting gaps to below 1 meV'. This is a load-bearing assertion for the claim that the nodal lines evolve into nearly cylindrical nodal surfaces across the Brillouin zone. However, no full kz-resolved gap map is provided; only the kz=0 and kz=π/c planes are shown. Since Mz protection applies only on those planes, a quantitative mapping of the gap along the nodal-line path as a function of kz is needed to support the 3D nodal-surface picture. Without it, the nodal lines are strictly 2D objects, and the 'nodal-line fermions' terminology may overstate the bulk topology.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title in the manuscript text reads 'ind-wave' — missing a space. Should be 'in d-wave'.
  2. [Abstract and text] The abstract uses 'C-paired' without defining C; later the text uses 'C4z-paired'. Please unify and define the notation early.
  3. [Fig. 4(d)] The phase diagram axes are labeled 'λ (eV)' and 'ΔE (eV)' but the curves are not fully described in the caption or text. Please define ΔE and the meaning of 'SL1 @ Ef' and 'SP1 @ Ef', and give the value of c used in ϵxy(λ).
  4. [Terminology] The phrase 'spinless nodal line' for SL1 is confusing; it is actually a spin-degenerate nodal line. Consider using 'spin-degenerate' or 'spin-unpolarized' instead.
  5. [Fig. 5II] The text says the broken-Mz structure yields 'two-dimensional Weyl nodes' along the Brillouin-zone boundary, but this is not elaborated. A brief explanation of their location and symmetry would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the monolayer Fermi-level isolation is an independent DFT result; the model's λ is an illustrative knob, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Bulk RbV2Te2O bands are computed with DFT+U; nodal lines are identified from Wannier-interpolated bands and symmetry eigenvalues; the minimal tight-binding model uses parameters extracted from the DFT/Wannier description and is used only to rationalize the dxy splitting in terms of in-plane V–O versus out-of-plane V–Te hoppings. The monolayer and asymmetric-slab results in Fig. 5 are independent DFT calculations, not outputs of the model, and the claimed Fermi-level isolation in structure III is read directly from DFT bands. The λ parameter of Fig. 4 is an illustrative tuning knob; it is not fitted to a prediction subset, and no claim is made that the model alone predicts the monolayer. The paper explicitly flags its physical limitation: "Away from these mirror planes, this protection is lost. Nevertheless, the quasi-two-dimensional electronic structure of RbV2Te2O limits the resulting gaps to below 1 meV." It also assumes a fixed magnetic order: "The magnetic ground state is a compensated collinear antiferromagnet with the Néel vector along the [001] direction." These are external physical assumptions and reliability risks, not derivational circularity. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its input, and no self-citation chain carries the central result. Under the hard-rule test requiring a quoted equation-to-equation reduction or fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT+U, symmetry eigenvalue arguments, and an assumed collinear d-wave magnetic order. The model mechanism is carried by fitted TB hoppings and an ad hoc anisotropy lambda; no new physical entities are postulated. The U-renormalization route is asserted with evidence deferred to the SM.

free parameters (4)
  • U_eff (DFT+U on V 3d) = 1 eV
    Introduced ad hoc in Methods; controls dxy vs dxz/dyz splitting and nodal-line positions, with no U scan in the main text.
  • lambda (hopping anisotropy parameter) = 0.13 eV (critical lambda_c = 0.025)
    Hand-set in the minimal TB model to reverse the dxy spin splitting and place the spin-valley-locked nodal line at the Fermi level; central to the design-principle claim.
  • c (scaling constant in epsilon_xy(lambda) = (1 + c lambda) epsilon_xy) = not specified
    Material-dependent constant introduced to define the model; value is not given.
  • TB hopping and onsite parameters {t1x, t1y, t2, epsilon} = not listed (SM Fig. S3)
    Wannier-fitted parameters underlying the Hamiltonian; values are deferred to an unreviewed supplement, so the reader cannot reproduce the model.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The ground state of AV2X2O is a compensated collinear antiferromagnet with moments along [001] and d-wave (C2||C4z) altermagnetic symmetry.
    Assumed from refs [26-28,32]; central because the spin-splitting pattern and Mz protection rely on this ordering.
  • domain assumption PBE+U (U_eff = 1 eV) accurately describes the low-energy V 3d bands, magnetic moments (~2.1 mu_B), and nodal-line positions.
    DFT exchange-correlation approximation; no comparison to experiment or higher-level methods in the main text.
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics is quasi-2D, so kz dispersion can be neglected and the kz=0 model represents bulk nodal lines extending along kz.
    Used to treat SP1/SL1 as nodal lines or near-cylindrical nodal surfaces; deviations produce gaps below 1 meV.
  • standard math On Mz-invariant planes, opposite mirror eigenvalues prevent hybridization and protect band crossings.
    Standard symmetry-eigenvalue argument used for Mz protection with and without spin-orbit coupling.
  • domain assumption Wannier projection onto V 3d, Te 5p, and O 2p orbitals faithfully captures the low-energy Kohn-Sham manifold.
    Needed for the TB Hamiltonian, nodal identification, and IrRep analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper Increasing the Hubbard U renormalizes hopping amplitudes so as to realize the lambda mechanism.
    Relegated to the Supplemental Material; no main-text evidence that correlation tuning specifically realizes the isolated SP1 state.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Isolation of spin-valley locked nodal-line fermions in $d$-wave $\mathrm{AV_2X_2O}$ altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IYYI2QQV

@misc{pith2026260726150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Isolation of spin-valley locked nodal-line fermions in $d$-wave $\mathrmAV_2X_2O$ altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IYYI2QQV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26150}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Crystalline symmetries stabilize topological states with distinct electronic properties, while altermagnets exhibit momentum-dependent spin splitting without net magnetization. Here, we combine first-principles calculations with a minimal tight-binding model to realize $C$-paired spin-valley-locked nodal-line fermions in the $d$-wave altermagnet $\mathrm{AV_2X_2O}$ (A = Rb, Cs, or K; X = Te, Se, or S). The low-energy electronic structure hosts coexisting spin-degenerate and spin-polarized nodal lines around $C_{4z}$-paired valleys near the Fermi level. The spin-polarized nodal lines are protected by the out-of-plane mirror symmetry $\mathcal{M}_z$ and remain robust against spin-orbit coupling. The minimal model reveals their microscopic origin and establishes a general design principle for their isolation. Layer engineering and electronic correlations serve as material-specific knobs for realizing these isolated spin-valley-locked nodal lines near the Fermi level. Our results establish the $\mathrm{AV_2X_2O}$ family as a versatile platform for exploring topological spin-valley locking in $d$-wave altermagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26150 by Bahadur Singh, Pritesh Srivastava, Rahul Verma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (b) shows the real-space spin density of RbV2Te2O. The spin density is predominantly localized on the V atoms and exhibits the four-lobed pattern char￾acteristic of d-wave altermagnetism. The principal spin axes of the two sublattices are rotated by π/2, consistent with the underlying [C2 ∥ C4z] symmetry. The corre￾sponding Fermi contours on the kz = 0 and kz = π/c planes are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Electronic structure and nodal configuration of bulk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Symmetry protection of nodal lines in RbV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Origin of isolated spin-valley-polarized nodal lines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Layer engineering of spin-valley-polarized nodal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Singh, H

    B. Singh, H. Lin, and A. Bansil, Topology and symmetry in quantum materials, Adv. Mater. 35, 2201058 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry- based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nat. Comm. 8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    M. Z. Hasan, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, G. Bian, S.-Y. Xu, and J.-X. Yin, Weyl, dirac and high-fold chiral fermions in topological quantum matter, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 784 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental perspec- tive on three-dimensional topological semimetals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025002 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Topological nodal semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011)

    2011

  9. [9]

    C. Fang, Y. Chen, H.-Y. Kee, and L. Fu, Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 081201(R) (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    Singh, X

    B. Singh, X. Zhou, H. Lin, and A. Bansil, Saddle-like topological surface states on the tT ′ x family of com- pounds (t, T ′ = transition metal, x = Si, ge), Phys. Rev. B 97, 075125 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    Singh, S

    B. Singh, S. Mardanya, C. Su, H. Lin, A. Agarwal, and A. Bansil, Spin-orbit coupling driven crossover from a starfruitlike nodal semimetal to dirac and weyl semimetal state in CaAuAs, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085122 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley hall effect in mos 2 transistors, Science 344, 1489 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, 6039 (1984)

    1984

  14. [14]

    Belopolski, K

    I. Belopolski, K. Manna, D. S. Sanchez, G. Chang, B. Ernst, J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, T. Cochran, N. Shu- miya, H. Zheng, B. Singh, G. Bian, D. Multer, M. Litske- vich, X. Zhou, S.-M. Huang, B. Wang, T.-R. Chang, S.- Y. Xu, A. Bansil, C. Felser, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Discovery of topological weyl fermion lines and drum- head surface states in a room temp...

    2019

  15. [15]

    Morali, R

    N. Morali, R. Batabyal, P. K. Nag, E. Liu, Q. Xu, Y. Sun, B. Yan, C. Felser, N. Avraham, and H. Bei- denkopf, Fermi-arc diversity on surface terminations of the magnetic weyl semimetal Co 3Sn2S2, Science 365, 1286 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Chang, S.-Y

    G. Chang, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, B. Singh, C.-H. Hsu, G. Bian, N. Alidoust, I. Belopolski, D. S. Sanchez, S. Zhang, et al., Room-temperature magnetic topolog- ical weyl fermion and nodal line semimetal states in half- metallic heusler Co 2TiX (x= si, ge, or sn), Sci. Rep. 6, 38839 (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    Chang, S.-Y

    G. Chang, S.-Y. Xu, X. Zhou, S.-M. Huang, B. Singh, B. Wang, I. Belopolski, J.-X. Yin, S. Zhang, A. Bansil, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Topological hopf and chain link semimetal states and their application to co2mnga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 156401 (2017). 6

    2017

  18. [18]

    Sakai, Y

    A. Sakai, Y. P. Mizuta, A. A. Nugroho, R. Sihomb- ing, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, N. Takemori, R. Ishii, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, P. Goswami, and S. Nakat- suji, Giant anomalous nernst effect and quantum-critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal, Nat. Phys.14, 1119 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 231 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    J. Lai, T. Yu, P. Liu, L. Liu, G. Xing, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun, d-wave flat fermi surface in altermagnets enables maximum charge-to-spin conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 256702 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalog of c- paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021083 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Yarmohammadi, M

    M. Yarmohammadi, M. Berritta, M. Bukov, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Linder, and P. M. Oppeneer, Spin polarization en- gineering in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 113, L060403 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, P. Wadley, D. Kriegner, H. Re- ichlov´ a, F. Krizek, H. Ohno, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermag- netic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 10.1038/s41567-025-02812- w (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02812- 2026

  26. [26]

    Ablimit, Y.-L

    A. Ablimit, Y.-L. Sun, E.-J. Cheng, Y.-B. Liu, S.-Q. Wu, H. Jiang, Z. Ren, S. Li, and G.-H. Cao, V 2Te2O: a two- dimensional van der waals correlated metal, Inorg. Chem. 57, 14617 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, et al., A metallic room- temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Chang, K

    P.-H. Chang, K. D. Belashchenko, and I. I. Mazin, Inverse lieb materials: altermagnetism and more, npj Quantum Mater. 11, 10.1038/s41535-026-00839-x (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00839-x 2026

  29. [29]

    Q. Cui, Y. Zhu, X. Yao, P. Cui, and H. Yang, Giant spin- hall and tunneling magnetoresistance effects based on a two-dimensional nonrelativistic antiferromagnetic metal, Phys. Rev. B 108, 024410 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    S. Liu, Z. Zhang, L. Bai, and W. Feng, Anomalous trans- port properties in the two-dimensional topological alter- magnet V2Te2O, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184437 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, et al., Crystal-symmetry- paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Nat. Phys. 21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Q. Hu, X. Cheng, Q. Duan, Y. Hu, B. Jiang, Y. Xiao, Y. Li, M. Pan, L. Deng, C. Liu, et al., Observation of spin-valley locked nodal lines in a quasi-2d altermagnet, arXiv:2601.02883

    arXiv

  33. [33]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  34. [34]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  35. [35]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An lsda+u study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  36. [36]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  37. [37]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools: An open-source software pack- age for novel topological materials, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 224, 405 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    Iraola, J

    M. Iraola, J. L. Manes, B. Bradlyn, M. K. Horton, T. Ne- upert, M. G. Vergniory, and S. S. Tsirkin, Irrep: Sym- metry eigenvalues and irreducible representations of ab initio band structures, Comput. Phys. Commun. 272, 108226 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Supplementary information

  40. [40]

    Cheng, Y

    X. Cheng, Y. Gao, and J. P. J. Liu, Realistic tight-binding model for V2Se2O-family altermagnets, arXiv:2602.09465

    arXiv

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.