Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 45 references

The paper computes the gravitational bremsstrahlung waveform for a small body scattering off a much heavier one at the eighth post-Minkowskian (six-loop) order with fractional sixth post-Newtonian accuracy, along with new radiative-loss qua

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:18 UTC pith:UZ4UQUWH

load-bearing objection Geralico actually computes to 7PM, not the advertised 8PM; the 7PM results are new and worth refereeing, but the abstract and conclusion must be corrected. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26614 v1 pith:UZ4UQUWH submitted 2026-07-29 gr-qc

Gravitational bremsstrahlung waveform at the eighth post-Minkowskian order in the extreme-mass-ratio limit

Andrea Geralico This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitational bremsstrahlungpost-Minkowskian expansionextreme-mass-ratio limitgravitational waveformscattering angleradiated angular momentummaster integralsBessel functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the frequency-domain gravitational waveform for the scattering of two nonspinning bodies in the extreme-mass-ratio limit to very high post-Minkowskian order. It claims eighth-order (six-loop) accuracy at the fractional sixth post-Newtonian level, and also derives the radiated angular momentum at fifth post-Minkowskian order and the radiation-reacted scattering angle at sixth order. If correct, these results provide a benchmark for multiloop scattering computations that currently reach only one or two loops. The technical core is a reduction of the orbit Fourier integrals to a finite set of master integrals built from Bessel functions, arctangent/arcsinh/logarithm kernels, and Meijer G functions, with the higher-order masters obeying inhomogeneous Bessel equations sourced by lower-order ones. The explicit computation in the body of the paper carries the waveform modes to O(G^7) (seven PM, five-loop); the eighth-order wording in the title and abstract is not backed by an explicit eighth-order waveform in Section V.

Core claim

The paper presents a systematic procedure, based on first-order perturbation theory for a small mass moving on a Schwarzschild geodesic, that produces the spin-weighted multipolar waveform modes as explicit functions of a dimensionless frequency variable. Up to the fourth post-Minkowskian order the modes are written in terms of iterated Bessel integrals expressible through Meijer G functions. Starting at the fifth order, most new master integrals do not admit closed forms; instead they satisfy inhomogeneous Bessel differential equations whose sources are lower-order masters. The paper also completes earlier radiative-loss analysis by giving the 5PM radiated angular momentum and the 6PM radia

What carries the argument

The central object is the reduced complex asymptotic waveform W, expanded in spin-weighted spherical harmonics with frequency-domain modes W_lm(ω). Each mode is an orbit integral over a quasi-Keplerian parameter, and after post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian expansion the integrands fall into families distinguished by powers of arctan(T), arcsinh(T), and ln(1+T^2). Integration-by-parts identities reduce each family to a small set of master integrals: at low PM order these are iterated Bessel functions expressible via Meijer G functions, while at and above O(G^5) they obey inhomogeneous Bessel equations with lower-order master integrals as sources. This master-integral reduction is what makes

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the combined post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian expansions can be interchanged with the orbit integration, and that the resulting infinite families of Fourier integrals reduce without loss to the finite master-integral sets listed in Table I.

What would settle it

Independently compute the 5PM radiated angular momentum by numerically integrating the time-domain gravitational flux along the exact geodesic and compare with Eq. (40); any discrepancy beyond the stated truncation order would indicate a failure of the master-integral reduction or of the imported static contribution. Alternatively, check whether the claimed O(G^8) waveform terms actually appear when the computation is extended one more PM order; their absence would confirm that the body's O(G^7) limit is the real result.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The O(G^7) waveform modes provide explicit targets for future amplitude-based scattering-waveform calculations, which currently reach only the one-loop level.
  • The 5PM radiated angular momentum and 6PM radiation-reacted scattering angle extend known 3PN-accurate results by seven additional PN orders, supplying checks for independent methods.
  • The master-integral hierarchy suggests that no qualitatively new transcendental functions are needed beyond iterated Bessel functions and Meijer G functions, which may simplify attempts to push to still higher PM orders.
  • If the missing eighth-order terms are supplied, the paper's claim would constitute the first six-loop classical gravitational waveform in the extreme-mass-ratio limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract and conclusion advertise the eighth post-Minkowskian order, but the explicit waveform computation in Section V stops at O(G^7); a careful reader should treat the six-loop title claim as not yet demonstrated in the body.
  • Because the new master integrals beyond O(G^4) are characterized by differential equations rather than closed-form evaluations, their practical usefulness depends on efficient numerical evaluation, which the paper does not provide.
  • The 5PM radiated angular momentum imports a static zero-frequency contribution from the infinite-past limit of a separate calculation; a small error in that matching would shift the entire radiation-reacted scattering angle, so it should be checked independently.
  • The paper's master-integral framework could in principle be adapted to equal-mass scattering by tracking mass-ratio corrections beyond the leading term, though the paper does not attempt this.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to compute the gravitational bremsstrahlung waveform for the scattering of two nonspinning bodies in the extreme-mass-ratio limit at the eighth post-Minkowskian order (O(G^8), six-loop) with fractional sixth post-Newtonian accuracy. The computation uses the Teukolsky formalism and the Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi solutions, expanding the source orbit in combined PM and PN series and reducing the resulting Fourier integrals to a set of master integrals. It also reports the 5PM radiated angular momentum and the 6PM radiation-reacted scattering angle. The body of the paper, however, states that the waveform is actually computed through the 7PM level (O(G^7)) and 6PN order, and the assembled master-integral list stops at O(G^7). The explicit waveform is relegated to an ancillary file that is not included in the manuscript.

Significance. If the weaker 7PM claim is accepted, the paper would still represent a substantial technical advance: it extends previously known 5PM waveform results to 7PM in the EMR limit, provides new 5PM radiated angular momentum and 6PM radiation-reacted scattering angle results, and identifies a growing family of master integrals of Bessel-function type. The use of the Teukolsky/MST formalism to reach high PM and PN orders simultaneously is a promising and nontrivial route, and the analytic forms in terms of Meijer G functions and iterated Bessel integrals are valuable for benchmarking amplitude-based computations. However, the headline claim of an 8PM waveform is not supported by the material presented, and the absence of the actual waveform data in the manuscript is a serious verifiability issue.

major comments (4)
  1. [Title, Abstract, Section V, Table I, Eq. (37)] The paper's central claim, repeated in the title, abstract, and concluding remarks, is that the waveform is computed at the eighth post-Minkowskian order, O(G^8), six-loop. Section V explicitly states: 'I computed the waveform modes (27) through the 7PM level and 6PN order, i.e., O(G^7, η^12).' Eq. (35) shows all multipole sums truncated at G^7, and Table I, whose last row is O(G^7), lists no O(G^8) master integrals. The ancillary file in Eq. (37) is defined as W_{G1}+...+W_{G7}. Thus the abstract and conclusion overstate the actual computation by one power of G. This is a load-bearing inconsistency: either the G^8 computation must be supplied, or the title, abstract, and conclusion must be corrected to claim 7PM (five-loop) results. The 'six-loop' terminology is also tied to G^8 and must be adjusted accordingly.
  2. [Eq. (37), Section V, ancillary file] The explicit waveform modes — the central result of the paper — are not present in the manuscript. Eq. (37) refers to an ancillary file with components W_{G1} through W_{G7}, but no such file is included or accessible from the submitted text. Without these expressions, a referee cannot verify the claimed results, reproduce them, or check the stated dependence on master integrals. If the journal permits ancillary files, the file must be supplied with the submission and its content should be at least partially summarized in the main text (e.g., representative modes or a validation against known lower-order results).
  3. [Section IV, Table I, Appendix A] The reduction of the infinite families of Fourier integrals to the finite master-integral lists in Table I is asserted rather than demonstrated. The text says 'one can derive from IBP identities recurrence relations' and 'most of them can be shown to satisfy inhomogeneous Bessel equations,' but no explicit IBP derivation, recurrence, or differential-equation verification is given for the O(G^5) and higher families. Appendix A shows a single example, Eq. (A11), but the claim that this pattern holds for all listed master integrals is not established. Since the master integrals are the building blocks of the final waveform, this is a load-bearing technical point; the authors should either provide the reduction details, include computer-verifiable ancillary code, or give a clear derivation for each new family.
  4. [Eq. (27), Section V.A] The computation relies on interchanging the PM and PN expansions with the orbit integral in Eq. (27). No convergence or asymptotic justification is given for termwise integration of an infinite series over the unbounded v-domain. A concrete check would be to compare the PN-expanded waveform at fixed u against the known exact 1PM result of Kovacs and Thorne for representative l, m, and a range of u; if the series is only asymptotic, the paper should state the truncation sense. A second fragile input is the static-mode contribution to the radiated angular momentum, imported from the author's Ref. [42] via the t→−∞ limit. If the matching to the infinite-past limit is not exactly the convention used in [42], Eq. (40) would be incorrect; the matching procedure should be displayed or checked independently.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A, after Eq. (A5)] Typo: 'whch' should be 'which'.
  2. [Eq. (13)] The notation 'h75PM or five−loop' for G^7 is confusing; likely should be 'h7PM or five−loop'. Please correct.
  3. [Section I, Eq. (6)] The expansion of e in terms of m2/b is given only to O((m2/b)^4) but the text claims O((m2/b)^6); please reconcile or state the truncation.
  4. [Section IV] The paragraph introducing Eq. (33) says 'For instance, up to O(G^7, η^12) (six-loop) one has...' but O(G^7) is five-loop, not six-loop. The loop-count terminology should be made consistent throughout.
  5. [References] Several references are to arXiv preprint numbers without journal details; please update where published. Also, the manuscript cites the author's own previous work heavily; ensure all borrowed results are clearly attributed and that the reader can locate the definitions of quantities imported from Refs. [37] and [42].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction found: the waveform and radiation-loss results are analytic consequences of the Teukolsky/PM-PN computation, with self-citations used only as prior independent inputs.

full rationale

The core derivation is not circular. The waveform modes are computed from the Teukolsky source integral in Eq. (27) by PM/PN expansion of the quasi-Keplerian orbit, followed by reduction of the resulting Fourier integrals to the master integrals in Table I via IBP identities. No data are fitted, and no output quantity is defined in terms of the claimed prediction. The self-citations to Refs. [37] and [42] supply previously computed ingredients — e.g., the O(G^0) static contribution to the radiated angular momentum integral, and the 6PM radiated energy used in the balance law for the radiation-reacted angle. These are used as inputs, not as redefinitions of the new results; Eq. (40) is an integral over the frequency-domain waveform plus the static term, and its lower-order terms are checked against the independent Refs. [43,44]. I also flag an internal inconsistency between the abstract/title claim of 8PM (O(G^8), six-loop) and the body statement 'I computed the waveform modes (27) through the 7PM level and 6PN order, i.e., O(G^7, η^12)'; this is a correctness/consistency concern, not a circularity. The statement that many O(G^5) and higher master integrals have no closed analytical form is a technical limitation, not a circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the calculation is purely analytic. The main assumptions are the extreme-mass-ratio/geodesic approximation, the validity of the Teukolsky/MST machinery, and—most delicately—the termwise double expansion plus IBP reduction to the listed master integrals. No invented physical entities appear.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The smaller mass follows a timelike geodesic in the unperturbed Schwarzschild spacetime (first-order self-force/EMR approximation).
    Used throughout Sections II and III; central to the entire computation.
  • domain assumption The Teukolsky equation with spin weight -2 and MST analytic solutions correctly describe the emitted gravitational radiation.
    Section III; standard but assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The PM and PN expansions can be taken inside the Fourier integral (27) and integrated termwise.
    Section IV; no convergence proof, and at O(G^5+) the resulting master integrals are not closed-form.
  • ad hoc to paper IBP reduction produces the finite lists of master integrals in Table I.
    Section IV and Table I; completeness of the reduction is asserted, not demonstrated.
  • standard math Background mathematical tools (Bessel functions, Meijer G functions, standard special-function identities).
    Appendix A.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 13126 in / 13764 out tokens · 108237 ms · 2026-08-01T12:18:08.169771+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The gravitational waveform generated by the scattering of two nonspinning bodies is computed in the frequency domain in the extreme-mass-ratio limit at the eighth post-Minkowskian (PM) order (i.e., $O(G^8)$, or six-loop) and at the fractional sixth post-Newtonian (PN) order. Previous results at $O(G^4)$ are completed here by computing the 5PM radiated angular momentum as well as the 6PM radiation-reacted scattering angle. Up to that order the waveform is expressed in terms of few master integrals, with integrands bilinear in (modified) Bessel functions, leading to iterated Bessel functions which can be in turn expressed in terms of Meijer G functions. Starting from $O(G^5)$ (four-loop) the structure of Fourier integrals becomes quite involved. In fact, there are several new families of master integrals, which can be shown to satisfy inhomogeneous Bessel equations with master integrals of lower order as sources. Although limited to the first order in the mass ratio, the results presented here significantly improve the accuracy of the scattering waveform, currently known at the one-loop level from quantum-amplitude-based computations or at the two-loop level (but with 2PN accuracy only) by using the multipolar-post-Minkowskian formalism.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Relativistic gravitational bremsstrahlung,

    P. C. Peters, “Relativistic gravitational bremsstrahlung,” Phys. Rev. D1, 1559-1571 (1970)

    1970

  2. [2]

    The Generation of Grav- itational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formu- las,

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, “The Generation of Grav- itational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formu- las,” Astrophys. J.217, 252-280 (1977)

    1977

  3. [3]

    The Generation of Grav- itational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung,

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, “The Generation of Grav- itational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung,” Astrophys. J.224, 62-85 (1978)

    1978

  4. [4]

    Gravitational radiation from point-masses in unbound orbits: Newtonian results,

    M. Turner, “Gravitational radiation from point-masses in unbound orbits: Newtonian results,” Astrophys. J.216, 610-619 (1977)

    1977

  5. [5]

    Post-Newtonian gravita- tional bremsstrahlung,

    M. Turner and C. M. Will, “Post-Newtonian gravita- tional bremsstrahlung,” Astrophys. J.220, 1107-1124 (1978)

    1978

  6. [6]

    Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a World- line Quantum Field Theory,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, “Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a World- line Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.20, 201103 (2021) [arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Gravi- tational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effec- 9 tive field theory,

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi, “Gravi- tational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effec- 9 tive field theory,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.2, 024041 (2021) [arXiv:2102.08339 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G 3),

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano, “The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G 3),” JHEP07, 169 (2021) [arXiv:2104.03256 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Ampli- tudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell, “Ampli- tudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP02, 137 (2019) [arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Waveforms from amplitudes,

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower and D. O’Connell, “Waveforms from amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.5, 056007 (2022) [arXiv:2107.10193 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower, “One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,” Nucl. Phys. B425, 217-260 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9403226 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  12. [12]

    Massive loop amplitudes from unitarity,

    Z. Bern and A. G. Morgan, “Massive loop amplitudes from unitarity,” Nucl. Phys. B467, 479-509 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9511336 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  13. [13]

    Generalized uni- tarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang- Mills,

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, “Generalized uni- tarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang- Mills,” Nucl. Phys. B725, 275-305 (2005) [arXiv:hep- th/0412103 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    New Re- lations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, “New Re- lations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D78, 085011 (2008) [arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Per- turbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, “Per- turbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 061602 (2010) [arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,” Nucl. Phys. B192, 159-204 (1981)

    1981

  17. [17]

    Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,

    A. V. Kotikov, “Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,” Phys. Lett. B254, 158-164 (1991)

    1991

  18. [18]

    Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,

    E. Remiddi, “Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,” Nuovo Cim. A110, 1435-1452 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9711188 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  19. [19]

    FIRE6: Feynman Integral REduction with modular arithmetic,

    A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chukharev, “FIRE6: Feynman Integral REduction with modular arithmetic,” Comput. Phys. Commun.247, 106877 (2020) [arXiv:1901.07808 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    One-loop gravi- tational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy- mass effective field theory,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De An- gelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini, “One-loop gravi- tational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy- mass effective field theory,” JHEP06, 048 (2023) [arXiv:2303.06111 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    The sub- leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng, “The sub- leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,” JHEP06, 004 (2023) [arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Radiation and reaction at one loop,

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola and I. A. Vazquez- Holm, “Radiation and reaction at one loop,” JHEP07, 272 (2024) [arXiv:2303.06211 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    In- elastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scatter- ing at one loop,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm, “In- elastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scatter- ing at one loop,” JHEP06, 126 (2023) [arXiv:2303.07006 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379-430 (1986)

    1986

  25. [25]

    Radiative gravitational fields in general rel- ativity. 2. Asymptotic behaviour at future null infinity,

    L. Blanchet, “Radiative gravitational fields in general rel- ativity. 2. Asymptotic behaviour at future null infinity,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A409, 383-399 (1987)

    1987

  26. [26]

    Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System,” Phys. Rev. D37, 1410 (1988)

    1988

  27. [27]

    Postnewtonian Generation of Gravitational Waves,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Postnewtonian Generation of Gravitational Waves,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.50, 377-408 (1989)

    1989

  28. [28]

    Multipole analysis for electromagnetism and linearized gravity with irreducible cartesian tensors,

    T. Damour and B. R. Iyer, “Multipole analysis for electromagnetism and linearized gravity with irreducible cartesian tensors,” Phys. Rev. D43, 3259-3272 (1991)

    1991

  29. [29]

    PostNewtonian generation of gravitational waves. 2. The Spin moments,

    T. Damour and B. R. Iyer, “PostNewtonian generation of gravitational waves. 2. The Spin moments,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.54, 115-164 (1991)

    1991

  30. [30]

    Hereditary effects in grav- itational radiation,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Hereditary effects in grav- itational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D46, 4304-4319 (1992)

    1992

  31. [31]

    Comparing one- loop gravitational bremsstrahlung amplitudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian waveform,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Comparing one- loop gravitational bremsstrahlung amplitudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian waveform,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 124052 (2023) [arXiv:2309.14925 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, “An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,” JHEP03, 089 (2024) [arXiv:2312.07452 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Post- Newtonian multipoles from the next-to-leading post- Minkowskian gravitational waveform,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, “Post- Newtonian multipoles from the next-to-leading post- Minkowskian gravitational waveform,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.10, 106020 (2024) [arXiv:2402.06361 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng, “Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 125008 (2024) [arXiv:2402.06604 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Gravita- tional bremsstrahlung waveform at the fourth post- Minkowskian order and the second post-Newtonian level,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Gravita- tional bremsstrahlung waveform at the fourth post- Minkowskian order and the second post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 064035 (2024) [arXiv:2407.02076 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Quadrupolar bremsstrahlung waveform at the third-and-a-half post- Newtonian accuracy,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Quadrupolar bremsstrahlung waveform at the third-and-a-half post- Newtonian accuracy,” [arXiv:2604.21522 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    High post-Minkowskian gravitational wave- form for hyperbolic encounters in the extreme-mass-ratio limit,

    A. Geralico, “High post-Minkowskian gravitational wave- form for hyperbolic encounters in the extreme-mass-ratio limit,” [arXiv:2603.11774 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Analytic black hole pertur- bation approach to gravitational radiation,

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole pertur- bation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    Self-force correction to the de- flection angle in black-hole scattering: A scalar charge toy model,

    L. Barack and O. Long, “Self-force correction to the de- flection angle in black-hole scattering: A scalar charge toy model,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.10, 104031 (2022) [arXiv:2209.03740 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,” Prog. Theor. Phys.96, 549 (1996) [gr-qc/9605057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 1079 (1996) [gr- qc/9603020]

    arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: Radiated energy and angu- lar momentum,

    A. Geralico, “Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: Radiated energy and angu- lar momentum,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 064088 (2025) [arXiv:2507.03442 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.8, 084031 (2021) [arXiv:2107.08896 [gr-qc]]. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Radiated mo- mentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiated mo- mentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.2, 024012 (2023) [arXiv:2210.07165 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Higher derivatives of the Bessel func- tions with respect to the order,

    Yu.A. Brychkov , “Higher derivatives of the Bessel func- tions with respect to the order,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, Taylor and Francis,27-7, 566-577, (2016)

    2016