Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Nonlinear Stability and Instability of Finite-Energy Solutions of the Compressible Euler-Riesz Equations with General Pressure Laws

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Attractive Euler–Riesz steady states are unstable in the mass-supercritical regime and stable when the pressure is mass-subcritical, with expanding support for positive-energy flows.

desk verdict Solid, long-form advance on Euler–Riesz stability/instability and weak solutions; the new pieces are real, and the classical/weak and uniqueness gaps are standard and flagged. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26782 v1 pith:ONYZ3UEG submitted 2026-07-29 math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MPphysics.bio-ph

Jose A. Carrillo , Samuel R. Charles , Gui-Qiang G. Chen , Difan Yuan This is my paper
classification math.APmath-phmath.FAmath.MPphysics.bio-ph MSC 35Q3135Q3535B3535L6535L6735D3035R0935B44
keywords compressibleEuler-Rieszequationsnonlinearstabilityinstabilityrelativeentropyweaksolutionscompensatedcompactnessconcentrationmass-criticalexponent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper maps when steady states of the compressible Euler–Riesz equations (fluids with nonlocal Riesz attraction or repulsion) survive small finite-energy perturbations. In the polytropic attractive case below the mass-critical exponent, free energy is concave along mass-preserving dilations, so nearby solutions develop growing support and leave any neighborhood of the steady state. Above that critical balance, and for general pressures with matching vacuum and infinity asymptotics, energy minimizers exist by concentration-compactness and are nonlinearly orbitally stable; a relative-entropy bound quantifies finite-time closeness without needing uniform density bounds away from vacuum. Positive-energy solutions still expand their support at a linear rate, so the stability is inherently local in time and space. Global spherically symmetric finite-energy weak solutions are constructed by compensated compactness, which upgrades the stability statement to unconditional within that class.

What carries the argument

Free-energy concavity along mass-preserving dilations (driving the supercritical instability via a virial/second-moment argument); concentration-compactness for minimizer existence; a modified relative internal energy built from the Euler–Lagrange relation of the steady state, controlling density perturbations including vacuum without lower bounds; and compensated compactness for global spherical weak solutions.

What would settle it

Exhibit a classical polytropic attractive solution in the mass-supercritical range whose density support stays bounded and whose relative energy to a steady state remains small for all time, or a general pressure law satisfying the paper’s asymptotics whose energy minimizer is non-unique up to translation and for which orbital stability fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For attractive compressible Euler–Riesz equations, steady states in the polytropic mass-supercritical window are nonlinearly unstable because free energy is concave under mass-preserving dilations, forcing growing support; at criticality any nearby solution can expand; while for general pressures in the mass-subcritical regime unique (up to translation) energy minimizers are nonlinearly orbitally stable for finite-energy solutions, with a relative-entropy estimate that needs no pointwise density bounds, support growth for positive energy proving locality, and global spherical weak solutions yielding unconditional stability in that class.

Load-bearing premise

Orbital stability needs the energy minimizer to be unique up to translation, and the instability and support-growth statements are proved for classical or sufficiently regular compactly supported solutions, while global existence is only for spherically symmetric weak solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mass-supercritical attractive polytropic stars modeled by Euler–Riesz cannot remain near steady states under small finite-energy perturbations; support must grow.
  • Mass-subcritical and general-pressure minimizers are nonlinearly orbitally stable among finite-energy solutions once uniqueness up to translation holds.
  • Positive-energy solutions expand support at a quantifiable linear rate, so variational stability is only local.
  • Within spherically symmetric finite-energy weak solutions, stability around minimizers is unconditional for admissible general pressures.
  • The same free-energy dilation, relative-entropy, and compensated-compactness tools apply to other nonlocal hyperbolic systems with vacuum free boundaries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous dilation-concavity instability should appear in aggregation–diffusion equations in the same supercritical parameter range, even though those equations are parabolic.
  • Dropping spherical symmetry in the existence theory would immediately give unconditional multi-D stability without symmetry, but the nonlocal Riesz estimates near the origin remain the main obstacle.
  • The relative-entropy method without density lower bounds may transfer to other free-boundary Euler systems with nonlocal forces (e.g., fractional Poisson).
  • At the mass-critical exponent the zero-energy steady state sits at a threshold where arbitrarily small positive-energy perturbations already expand, suggesting a sharp dynamical transition rather than a soft one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear stability and instability of steady states for multidimensional compressible Euler–Riesz equations (CEREs) with general barotropic pressures and Riesz potentials α∈(0,n). For attractive polytropic gases in the mass-supercritical range 2n/(2n−α)<γ<n+α/n, steady states are shown nonlinearly unstable by free-energy concavity along mass-preserving dilations (Thm 2.8); at the mass-critical exponent, nearby solutions can develop growing support. For general pressures with the stated near-vacuum/infinity asymptotics (γ-type balance >n+α/n), concentration-compactness yields energy minimizers that are nonlinearly orbitally stable for finite-energy weak solutions (Thm 2.9), quantified by a relative-entropy bound without uniform pointwise density bounds (Thm 2.11). Positive-energy solutions have linearly growing support (Thm 2.6), including a new argument for α>2. Global spherically symmetric finite-energy weak solutions are constructed for general pressures via vanishing viscosity and compensated compactness (Thm 2.18), giving unconditional stability in that class (Cor 2.19).

Significance. The work substantially extends the CEPE/CERE stability program (Rein, Luo–Smoller, Deng–Liu–Yang–Yao, Cheng–Cheng–Lin, Carrillo–Charles–Chen–Yuan) to nonlocal Riesz interactions and non-power pressures. Load-bearing technical contributions include: (i) mixed-regime dilation analysis separating internal and Riesz scaling; (ii) relative entropy with modified internal energy h_μ exploiting the Euler–Lagrange relation, controlling vacuum free boundaries without lower bounds on the steady density (Lemmas 5.8–5.11); (iii) second-moment growth for α>2 under a mass threshold (Lemma 3.2); (iv) radial compactness of the nonlocal energy via fractional Sobolev embeddings (Lemma 4.6); (v) existence for general pressures over α∈(−1,n−1). These are concrete advances useful beyond CEREs. Limitations (uniqueness of minimizers cited rather than proved for all pressures; instability/growth for classical solutions vs. spherical weak existence) are standard and clearly flagged.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.4, Theorem 2.9; §5.2; Corollary 2.19] Theorem 2.9 and Corollary 2.19 condition orbital stability on uniqueness of the energy minimizer up to translation. The manuscript cites prior uniqueness (e.g. [12, Thm 5.5] and references) but does not establish uniqueness for every pressure satisfying only (1.2) and (2.2)–(2.3). This is load-bearing for the stability claim as stated. Either prove uniqueness under the paper’s pressure hypotheses, or restate Thm 2.9/Cor 2.19 explicitly as stability of the set of minimizers (orbital stability modulo the full minimizing set), consistent with the concentration-compactness construction in §5.1–5.2.
  2. [§2.3 Theorem 2.8; §3; §4 Lemma 4.12–4.14] Instability (Thm 2.8) and support growth (Thm 2.6, Lemmas 3.1–3.4) are proved for classical (or sufficiently regular compactly supported) solutions, while global existence (Thm 2.18) is only for spherically symmetric finite-energy weak solutions. Corollary 3.5 partially bridges growth to weak solutions with finite second moment, but the main instability theorem does not. The gap should be stated more sharply in the introduction and near Thm 2.8: either extend the virial/Q-invariance argument to the spherical weak class under the integrability of Thm 2.11, or clearly label Thm 2.8 as conditional on classical solvability. This does not invalidate the claims under their hypotheses, but it limits the “unconditional” reading outside Cor 2.19.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Definition 2.5; §6] In Definition 2.5 and the α∈[n−1,n) existence theory, the Hölder requirement β∈(1+α−n,1) is stated but the passage from weak solutions of CNSREs to this regularity could be cross-referenced more explicitly to the estimates used in §6.
  2. [§2 and §4–5] Notation switches between E(ρ,M), G, S_μ, E_μ, and d(ρ,ρ̄) are heavy; a short notation table or consistent reminder at the start of §§4–5 would help.
  3. [Title; §2.5] Typos/spacing in the title block and headings (“ST ABILITY”, “EQUA TIONS”, “W eak Solutions”) should be cleaned for the journal version.
  4. [Remark 2.16; Theorem 2.11] Remark 2.16 defers rotating-star and general-pressure relative entropy extensions; a one-sentence pointer to which estimates fail without γ≤2 would clarify the scope of Thm 2.11.
  5. [Lemma 4.6] Lemma 4.6 assumes γ<n/(n−α) for the compact embedding range; this is compatible with the supercritical interval but could be flagged when α is close to n.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: stability/instability/existence claims are derived from energy, scaling, and compensated-compactness arguments; uniqueness is an explicit hypothesis, not a self-forced prediction.

  1. self citation load bearing [§5.1 / statement of Theorem 2.9; uniqueness paragraph before §5.2]
    "Suppose that ¯ρ is a unique minimizer (up to translation) of functional G in X_M. ... For the uniqueness of global minimizers and steady states, see [12, Theorem 5.5] and the references therein. For the rest of this subsection, we assume the uniqueness of the global minimizer (up to translation) as required in Theorem 2.9."

    Orbital stability is conditional on uniqueness up to translation, which for the polytropic setting is imported from the authors’ prior paper [12] rather than proved here for all admissible general pressures. This is a mild self-citation dependency on a hypothesis, not a definitional loop: the stability argument given uniqueness is independent, and the paper states the assumption explicitly rather than claiming uniqueness is forced externally.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing chains are standard PDE/variational arguments rather than definitional or fitted loops. Instability (Thm 2.8) follows from concavity of S_μ along mass-preserving dilations and a second-moment lower bound when Q(ρ) stays positive—Q and the dilation map are defined independently of the conclusion that R(t)→∞. Orbital stability (Thm 2.9) uses Lions concentration-compactness plus energy decrease; uniqueness of the minimizer up to translation is stated as an assumption and pointed to prior work ([12] and references), not smuggled in as an external forced fact that manufactures the stability conclusion. The relative-entropy bound (Thm 2.11) builds a modified internal energy from the Euler–Lagrange relation of the steady state and proves coercivity and Gronwall control; that is Lyapunov design, not X defined as Y. Support growth (Thm 2.6) and spherical weak existence (Thm 2.18) likewise rest on virial identities and compensated compactness with cited background lemmas. Self-citations to the authors’ prior CERE/Euler–Poisson papers supply technical lemmas and the polytropic uniqueness reference; they are not a closed self-citation chain that makes the new theorems true by construction. Score 1 reflects only routine self-citation background, not circular derivation of the central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Load-bearing structure is standard continuum mechanics plus analytic hypotheses on pressure and interaction kernel; no empirical fits. Stability theory additionally imports uniqueness of minimizers and works in function classes (classical vs weak, spherical symmetry) that are not fully unified.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Barotropic pressure p∈C² with p'>0 and genuine nonlinearity 2p'+ρp''>0; polytropic or general asymptotic conditions (2.2)–(2.3) / (2.10)–(2.13) balancing internal vs Riesz energy.
    Defines the constitutive class throughout §§2–6; mass-critical exponent n+α/n is read off this scaling.
  • domain assumption Interaction is Riesz/logarithmic potential Φ_α with κ∈{−1,1}; α ranges restricted by result (e.g. α∈(0,n) for stability/instability, α∈(−1,n−1) for existence).
    Model definition (1.1) and kernel conventions; nonlocal estimates depend on α.
  • standard math Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev, weak Young, Riesz rearrangement, Lions concentration-compactness, and fractional Sobolev compact embeddings hold as cited.
    Used for energy bounds, minimizer existence (Thm 5.2/Cor 5.7), and supercritical compactness (Lemma 4.6).
  • domain assumption Energy minimizer in X_M is unique up to translation when stating nonlinear orbital stability.
    Explicit hypothesis of Theorem 2.9; uniqueness referred to prior work rather than proved for all general pressures here.
  • domain assumption Instability and second-moment growth statements assume global classical (or sufficiently regular compactly supported) solutions so integrations by parts and free boundary are justified.
    Stated at start of §3 and in Thms 2.6–2.8; existence theory later only guarantees weak spherical solutions.
  • domain assumption Global weak existence uses spherical symmetry, BD viscosities, and compensated-compactness framework for general pressure laws.
    Theorem 2.18 and §6; unconditional stability corollary lives in this symmetry class.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear Stability and Instability of Finite-Energy Solutions of the Compressible Euler-Riesz Equations with General Pressure Laws." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONYZ3UEG

@misc{pith2026260726782,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear Stability and Instability of Finite-Energy Solutions of the Compressible Euler-Riesz Equations with General Pressure Laws},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONYZ3UEG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26782}
}
read the original abstract

The compressible Euler-Riesz equations arise in the modeling of a wide range of physical phenomena, including stellar dynamics, plasma physics, and mathematical biology. In this paper, we investigate the nonlinear stability and instability of steady states for the multidimensional compressible Euler-Riesz equations under general pressure laws. In the polytropic case, we establish the nonlinear instability of steady states in the mass-supercritical regime for attractive potentials; this is achieved by analyzing the concavity of the free energy along mass-preserving dilations. At the mass-critical exponent, we show that, for any steady state, there exist solutions that start arbitrarily close to it, but develop growing support. For general pressure laws, we employ a concentration-compactness approach to prove the existence of energy minimizers and establish the nonlinear stability of steady states. Moreover, we quantify the finite-time stability by deriving a relative entropy bound for finite-energy solutions, without requiring uniform pointwise upper and lower bounds on the density. We further exploit the convexity of the second moment to obtain quantitative growth estimates for solutions with positive energy, thereby proving the local nature of the stability result. Finally, we prove the global existence of finite-energy weak solutions to the compressible Euler-Riesz equations with spherical symmetry for general pressure laws via the compensated compactness method, thereby yielding unconditional stability around steady states within the class of weak solutions. The approach developed in this paper should be useful for solving other nonlinear partial differential equations involving similar difficulties.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Alberti, R

    G. Alberti, R. Choksi, and F. Otto, Uniform energy distribution for an isoperimetric problem with long-range interactions,J. Amer. Math. Soc.22(2)(2009), 569–605

    2009

  2. [2]

    Alberti and S

    G. Alberti and S. M¨ uller, A new approach to variational problems with multiple scales, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.54(7)(2001), 761–825

    2001

  3. [3]

    N. J. Alves, J. A. Carrillo, and Y.-P. Choi, Weak-strong uniqueness and high-friction limit for Euler-Riesz systems,Comm. Math. Anal. Appl.3(2)(2024), 266–286

    2024

  4. [4]

    Balagu´ e, J.A

    D. Balagu´ e, J.A. Carrillo, T. Laurent, and G. Raoul, Nonlocal interactions by repulsive- attractive potentials: radial ins/stability,Phys. D.260(2013), 5–25

    2013

  5. [5]

    Bobylev, P

    A.V. Bobylev, P. Dukes, R. Illner, and H.D. Victory, On Vlasov-Manev equations, I. Foun- dations, properties, and nonglobal existence,J. Statist. Phys.88(1997), 885–911

    1997

  6. [6]

    Bresch and B

    D. Bresch and B. Desjardins, On viscous shallow-water equations (Saint-Venant model) and the quasi-geostrophic limit,C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris,335(2002), 1079–1084. 70 J.A. CARRILLO, S.R. CHARLES, G.-Q. CHEN, AND D. F. YUAN

    2002

  7. [7]

    Bresch, B

    D. Bresch, B. Desjardins, and C. K. Lin, On some compressible fluid models: Korteweg, lubrication, and shallow water systems,Comm. Partial Diff. Eqs.28(2003), 843–868

    2003

  8. [8]

    Calvez, J.A

    V. Calvez, J.A. Carrillo, and F. Hoffmann, Equilibria of homogeneous functionals in the fair-competition regime,Nonlinear Anal.159(2017), 85–128

    2017

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Calvez, J.A

    V. Calvez, J.A. Carrillo, and F. Hoffmann, Uniqueness of stationary states for singular Keller– Segel type models,Nonlinear Anal.205(2021), Paper No. 112222, 24 pp

    2021

  2. [10]

    Campa, T

    A. Campa, T. Dauxois, D. Fanelli, and S. Ruffo,Physics of Long-Range Interacting Systems, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Carrillo, S

    J.A. Carrillo, S. Hittmeir, B. Volzone, and Y. Yao, Nonlinear aggregation-diffusion equations: radial symmetry and long time asymptotics,Invent. Math.218(2019), 889–977

    2019

  4. [12]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. R. Charles, G.-Q. Chen, and D. Yuan, Global existence and nonlinear stabil- ity of finite-energy solutions of the compressible Euler-Riesz equations with large initial data of spherical symmetry,Commun. Math. Phys.2026 (to appear); Preprint arXiv:2502.13094, 2025

    2026 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Carrillo and Y.-P

    J.A. Carrillo and Y.-P. Choi, Mean-Field Limits: From particle descriptions to macroscopic equations,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.241(3)(2021), 1529–1573

    2021

  6. [14]

    Carrillo, Y.-P

    J.A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi, and S.P. Perez, A review on attractive–repulsive hydrodynamics for consensus in collective behavior, In:Active Particles, Vol. 1: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications, pp. 259–298, Birkh¨ auser/Springer: Cham, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Carrillo, K

    J.A. Carrillo, K. Craig, and Y. Yao, Aggregation-diffusion equations: dynamics, asymptotics, and singular limits, In:Active Particles, Vol. 2: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applica- tions,Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol., pp. 65–108, Birkh¨ auser/Springer: Cham, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    Carrillo, F

    J.A. Carrillo, F. Hoffmann, E. Mainini, and B. Volzone, Ground states in the diffusion- dominated regime,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations,57: 127 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Cercignani, R

    C. Cercignani, R. Illner, and M. Pulvirenti,The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases, Ap- plied Mathematical Sciences,106, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1994

    1994

  10. [18]

    Chan, M.D.M

    H. Chan, M.D.M. Gonz´ alez, Y.-H. Huang, E. Mainini, and B. Volzone, Uniqueness of entire ground states for the fractional plasma problem,Calc. Var. Paritial Differential Equations, 59: 195 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Chandrasekhar,An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structures,University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1938

    S. Chandrasekhar,An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structures,University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1938

    1938

  12. [20]

    Chen, Convergence of the Lax-Friedrichs scheme for isentropic gas dynamics (III).Acta Math

    G.-Q. Chen, Convergence of the Lax-Friedrichs scheme for isentropic gas dynamics (III).Acta Math. Sci.6B(1986), 75–120 (in English);8A(1988), 243–276 (in Chinese)

    1986

  13. [21]

    Chen and J

    G.-Q. Chen and J. Chen, Stability of rarefaction waves and vacuum states for the multidi- mensional Euler equations,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ.4(1)(2007), 105–122

    2007

  14. [22]

    Chen and P

    G.-Q. Chen and P. G. LeFloch, Compressible Euler equations with general pressure law,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.153(3)(2000), 221–259

    2000

  15. [23]

    Chen and P

    G.-Q. Chen and P. G. LeFloch, Existence theory for the isentropic Euler equations,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.166(1)(2003), 81–98

    2003

  16. [24]

    G.-Q. Chen, L. He, Y. Wang, and D. F. Yuan, Global solutions of the compressible Euler- Poisson equations with large initial data of spherical symmetry,Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 77(6)(2024), 2947–3025

    2024

  17. [25]

    G.-Q. Chen, F. Huang, T. Li, W. Wang, and Y. Wang, Global finite-energy solutions of the compressible Euler-Poisson equations for general pressure laws with large initial data of spherical symmetry,Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024), no. 3, Paper No. 77, 85 pp

    2024

  18. [26]

    Chen and M

    G.-Q. Chen and M. Perepelitsa, Vanishing viscosity limit of the Navier-Stokes equations to the Euler equations for compressible fluid flow,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.63(11)(2010), 1469–1504

    2010

  19. [27]

    Chen and J

    L. Chen and J. Wang, Exact criterion for global existence and blow up to a degenerate Keller-Segel system,Doc. Math.19(2014), 103–120. NONLINEAR STABILITY AND INSTABILITY 71

    2014

  20. [28]

    Cheng, X

    M. Cheng, X. Cheng, and Z. Lin, Expanding solutions near unstable Lane-Emden stars, Commun. Math. Phys.406:165(2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Chi, L.-Y

    M. Chi, L.-Y. Shou, and J. Xu, The pressureless damped Euler-Riesz system in the critical regularity framework,J. Math. Fluid Mech.27:60(2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Choi and I.-J

    Y.-P. Choi and I.-J. Jeong, On well-posedness and singularity formation for the Euler-Riesz system,J. Differential Equations,306(2022), 296–332

    2022

  23. [31]

    Choi and J

    Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung, The pressureless damped Euler-Riesz equations,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire,40(3)(2022), 593–630

    2022

  24. [32]

    Y.-P. Choi, J. Jung, and Y. Lee, Global smooth solutions to the irrotational Euler-Riesz system in three dimensions,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.379(1)(2026),241-288

    2026

  25. [33]

    Y.-P. Choi, J. Jung, and Y. Lee, The global Cauchy problem for the Euler–Riesz equations, Nonlinear Anal.253(2025), 113724

    2025

  26. [34]

    Conti, G

    S. Conti, G. Dolzmann, and S. M¨ uller, The div–curl lemma for sequences whose divergence and curl are compact inW −1,1,C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris,349(3–4)(2011), 175–178

    2011

  27. [35]

    Cotar, G

    C. Cotar, G. Friesecke, and C. Kl¨ uppelberg, Density functional theory and optimal trans- portation with Coulomb cost,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.66(4)(2013), 548–599

    2013

  28. [36]

    Cotar and M

    C. Cotar and M. Petrache, Next-order asymptotic expansion for N-marginal optimal transport with Coulomb and Riesz costs,Adv. Math.344(2019), 137–233

    2019

  29. [37]

    Danchin and B

    R. Danchin and B. Ducomet, On the global existence for the compressible Euler-Riesz system, J. Math. Fluid Mech.24: 48 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Deng, T.-P

    Y. Deng, T.-P. Liu, T. Yang, and Z.-A. Yao, Solutions of Euler-Poisson equations for gaseous stars,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.164(3)(2002), 261–285

    2002

  31. [39]

    M. G. Delgadino, X. Yan, and Y. Yao, Uniqueness and nonuniqueness of steady states of aggregation-diffusion equations,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.75(1)(2022), 3–59

    2022

  32. [40]

    Ding, G.-Q

    X. Ding, G.-Q. Chen, and P. Luo, Convergence of the Lax-Friedrichs scheme for the isentropic gas dynamics (I)-(II),Acta Math. Sci.5B(1985), 483–500, 501–540 (in English);7A(1987), 467–480;8A(1989), 61–94 (in Chinese)

    1985

  33. [41]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces,Bull. Sci. Math.136(5)(2012), 521–573

    2012

  34. [42]

    Flucher and J

    M. Flucher and J. Wei, Asymptotic shape and location of small cores in elliptic free-boundary problems,Math. Z.228(4)(1998), 683–703

    1998

  35. [43]

    Y. Guo, M. Hadzi´ c, and J. Jang, Continued gravitational collapse for Newtonian stars,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.239(1)(2021), 431–552

    2021

  36. [44]

    Y. Guo, M. Hadzi´ c, J. Jang, and M. Schrecker, Gravitational collapse for polytropic gaseous stars: Self-similar solutions,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.246(2–3)(2022), 957–1066

    2022

  37. [45]

    Hadzi´ c and J

    M. Hadzi´ c and J. Jang, Nonlinear stability of expanding star solutions of the radially sym- metric mass-critical Euler–Poisson system,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.71(5)(2018), 827–891

    2018

  38. [46]

    Hadzi´ c and J

    M. Hadzi´ c and J. Jang, Expanding large global solutions of the equations of compressible fluid mechanics,Invent. Math.214(3)(2018), 1205–1266

    2018

  39. [47]

    Hadzi´ c and J

    M. Hadzi´ c and J. Jang, A class of global solutions to the Euler–Poisson system,Commun. Math. Phys.370(2)(2019), 475–505

    2019

  40. [48]

    Illner, Stellar dynamics, and plasma physics with corrected potentials: Vlasov, Manev, Boltzmann, Smoluchowski, hydrodynamic limits and related topics, Fields Inst.Comm

    R. Illner, Stellar dynamics, and plasma physics with corrected potentials: Vlasov, Manev, Boltzmann, Smoluchowski, hydrodynamic limits and related topics, Fields Inst.Comm. Amer. Math. Soc.27 (2000), 95–108, Providence: RI

    2000

  41. [49]

    Jang, Nonlinear instability in gravitational Euler-Poisson system forγ= 6 5 ,Arch

    J. Jang, Nonlinear instability in gravitational Euler-Poisson system forγ= 6 5 ,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.188(2008), 265–307

    2008

  42. [50]

    Jang, Nonlinear instability theory of Lane-Emden stars,Comm

    J. Jang, Nonlinear instability theory of Lane-Emden stars,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.67, (2014), 1418–1465

    2014

  43. [51]

    P. D. Lax, Shock wave and entropy, In:Contributions to Functional Analysis, ed. E. A. Zarantonello, pp. 603–634, Academic Press: New York, 1971. 72 J.A. CARRILLO, S.R. CHARLES, G.-Q. CHEN, AND D. F. YUAN

    1971

  44. [52]

    E. H. Lieb and J. L. Lebowitz, Existence of thermodynamics for real matter with Coulomb forces,Phys. Rev. Lett.22(1969), 631–634

    1969

  45. [53]

    Z. Lin, Y. Wang, and H. Zhu, Nonlinear stability of non-rotating gaseous stars,Math. Ann. 391(1)(2025), 843–880

    2025

  46. [54]

    Lewin, Coulomb and Riesz gases: the known and the unknown,J

    M. Lewin, Coulomb and Riesz gases: the known and the unknown,J. Math. Phys.63(6) (2022), 061101

    2022

  47. [55]

    Lewin, E

    M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb, and R. Seiringer, Statistical mechanics of the uniform electron gas,J. ´Ec. Polytech. Math.5(2017), 79–116

    2017

  48. [56]

    E. H. Lieb and R. Seiringer,The Stability of Matter in Quantum Mechanics,Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2010

    2010

  49. [57]

    E. H. Lieb and M. Loss,Analysis, Second Edition, AMS: Providence, 2001

    2001

  50. [58]

    Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations: I

    P.-L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations: I. The locally compact case,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´eAnal. Non Lin´eaire,1(2)(1984), 109–145

    1984

  51. [59]

    Luo and J

    T. Luo and J. Smoller, Nonlinear dynamical stability of Newtonian rotating and non-rotating white dwarfs and rotating supermassive stars,Commun. Math. Phys.284(2008), 425–457

    2008

  52. [60]

    Luo and J

    T. Luo and J. Smoller, Existence and non-linear stability of rotating star solutions of the compressible Euler–Poisson equations,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.191(3)(2009), 447–496

    2009

  53. [61]

    T. Luo, Z. Xin, and H. Zeng, On nonlinear asymptotic stability of the Lane–Emden solutions for the viscous gaseous star problem,Adv. Math.291(2016), 90–182

    2016

  54. [62]

    Rein, Non-linear stability of gaseous stars,Arch

    G. Rein, Non-linear stability of gaseous stars,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.168(2)(2003), 115–130

    2003

  55. [63]

    M. R. I. Schrecker and S. Schulz, Vanishing viscosity limit of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations with general pressure law,SIAM J. Math. Anal.51(3)(2019), 2168–2205

    2019

  56. [64]

    Serfaty,Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz Gases, Preprint arXiv:2407.21194, 2024

    S. Serfaty,Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz Gases, Preprint arXiv:2407.21194, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Serrin and D

    J. Serrin and D. E. Varberg, A general chain rule for derivatives and the change of variables formula for the Lebesgue integral,Amer. Math. Monthly,76(5)(1969), 514–520

    1969

  58. [66]

    T. C. Sideris, Formation of singularities in three-dimensional compressible fluids,Commun. Math. Phys.101(4)(1985), 475–485

    1985

  59. [67]

    S. L. Sobolev, On a theorem of functional analysis,Mat. Sbornik,4(1938), 471–497

    1938

  60. [68]

    Yan and Y

    X. Yan and Y. Yao, Sharp stability for the interaction energy,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.246 (2022), 603–629

    2022

  61. [69]

    Yao and A

    Y. Yao and A. L. Bertozzi, Blow-up dynamics for the aggregation equation with degenerate diffusion,Phys. D,260(2013), 77–89. J.A. Carrillo: Mathematical institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK Email address:carrillo@maths.ox.ac.uk S.R. Charles: Department of Mathem...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.