Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetic-like compensated ferrimagnets with charge ordering

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An Fe3O5 monolayer is predicted to host hybrid altermagnetic–Zeeman spin splitting that an electric field fully reverses at zero net magnetization, with conductivity spin polarization above 99%.

desk verdict Solid DFT prediction of hybrid switchable spin splitting in Fe3O5, but the headline device properties live only in a strained metastable UUD-AFM phase 6.66 meV above SAFM. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26971 v1 pith:X4VX4ZQL submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el

Xinyu Yang , Shuai Dong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetschargeorderinghybridspin-splittingmagnetoelectricitycompensatedferrimagnetsferroelectricswitchingspin-polarizedconductivityFe3O5monolayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that unconventional collinear magnets with near-zero magnetization can be made electrically switchable by adding ferroelectricity and charge ordering. It predicts that a Fe3O5 monolayer in an up-up-down antiferromagnetic state realizes a hybrid nonrelativistic spin splitting: altermagnetic-like alternating splitting along certain k-paths, superposed on a global Zeeman-type splitting. Because of spin–charge coupling tied to the b-axis polarization, flipping that polarization reverses the entire spin-split band structure while the net moment stays strictly zero. As a narrow-gap semiconductor the material then shows strongly anisotropic, ferroelectrically switchable spin-polarized conductivity whose polarization ratio remains above 99% even with light doping—comparable to half-metals but without stray fields. A sympathetic reader cares because this combination would give a 2D platform for nonvolatile electric control of highly spin-polarized transport without the usual drawbacks of ferromagnets or conventional antiferromagnets.

What carries the argument

Hybrid spin-splitting driven by the UUD magnetic order plus Fe3+/Fe4+ charge ordering in the square-pyramid Fe3O5 lattice: local TR/TM symmetries keep an altermagnetic-like alternating pattern while global Tτ breaking supplies Zeeman splitting; the b-axis polarization component alone reverses the spin channels through spin–charge coupling.

What would settle it

Synthesize or isolate the Fe3O5 monolayer (or a close analogue), apply uniaxial tensile strain near 1.5% if needed, and measure whether an electric field that reverses the b-axis polarization also reverses the sign of the spin-polarized conductivity (or the spin texture of the bands near the Fermi level) while the net moment remains zero.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the UUD-AFM phase of the Fe3O5 monolayer, charge ordering and broken Tτ/PT symmetries produce a hybrid spin-splitting (k-path alternating plus Zeeman) that is fully reversed by switching the b-axis ferroelectric polarization via hidden magnetoelectric spin–charge coupling, while net magnetization remains zero and the conductivity spin-polarization ratio stays above 99%.

Load-bearing premise

The functional UUD-AFM phase must be the one that is realized; DFT finds a lower-energy stripy antiferromagnet only 6.66 meV per formula unit below it, and UUD-AFM becomes preferred only under about 1.5% tensile strain, with the whole electronic structure depending on a chosen Hubbard U of 4 eV.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 2D compensated ferrimagnet can serve as an electrically switchable spin injector/filter with >99% polarization and no stray fields.
  • Spin-polarized transport becomes anisotropic and ferroelectrically reversible without needing spin–orbit coupling.
  • The same design—UUD order plus charge ordering in M3X5 pyramids—can be extended to related monolayers such as Mn3O5.
  • Magnetoelectric devices can exploit hidden spin–charge coupling even when the macroscopic magnetization stays strictly compensated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the strain window that stabilizes UUD-AFM proves experimentally accessible, the material class offers a route to gate-tunable altermagnetic-like transport in oxide monolayers compatible with electrostatic control.
  • Failure to observe the hybrid splitting under the predicted strain would most directly falsify either the magnetic ground-state ordering or the adequacy of the chosen Hubbard U, not the conceptual hybrid-splitting mechanism itself.
  • The fractional-quantum ferroelectric contribution may be a general handle for electrically tuning local TR/TM symmetries in other charge-ordered 2D magnets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript predicts that the Fe3O5 monolayer hosts a multiferroic UUD-AFM phase with charge ordering (Fe3+:Fe4+ = 2:1), nearly zero net magnetization, and a hybrid nonrelativistic spin splitting that superposes altermagnetic-like k-path alternating splitting with ferrimagnet-like Zeeman splitting. Using DFT (PBE+U), Berry-phase polarization, and Boltzmann transport, the authors argue that the b-axis ferroelectric component Pb reverses the spin splitting and the anisotropic spin-polarized conductivity via spin–charge coupling (hidden magnetoelectricity), while net M remains zero and the conductivity spin-polarization ratio stays above 99% near the Fermi level. SAFM is identified as the unstrained ground state; UUD-AFM lies 6.66 meV/f.u. higher and is stabilized under ~1.5% uniaxial tension. An Mn3O5 analog and discrete A/B/C UUD configurations are used as controls.

Significance. If the UUD-AFM phase is experimentally accessible and the hybrid splitting is robust, the work offers a concrete 2D platform that combines compensated magnetism, large nonrelativistic spin splitting, narrow-gap semiconducting transport with SP ratios approaching half-metals, and electric-field switchability—addressing limitations the authors correctly note for GaFeO3 and weakly coupled vdW bilayers. Strengths include clear symmetry reasoning (Tτ/PT breaking vs residual TR/TM), explicit Pa vs Pb control (Table 2, states A–C), filled-band argument for strict compensation, phonon stability of both orders, and a second-material check (Mn3O5). The hybrid-splitting concept and spin–charge magnetoelectric framing are of genuine interest to the altermagnetism and 2D multiferroics communities.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 1; Fig. 3(e); Abstract; Conclusions] Table 1 and Fig. 3(e): The functional physics (hybrid splitting, Pb-switchable bands, SP>99%) exists only in UUD-AFM, which is 6.66 meV/f.u. above SAFM and preferred only near a≈5.156 Å (~1.5% uniaxial tension). The abstract, title, and Conclusions attribute these properties to “the Fe3O5 monolayer” without that qualifier. SAFM restores global Tτ and kills the splitting (Fig. 3a). The manuscript must (i) state the strain/energy condition prominently in the abstract and main claims, and (ii) strengthen the case that UUD-AFM is thermodynamically or field-accessible (e.g., substrate strain estimates, magnetic anisotropy/exchange barriers, or finite-T discussion), not only dynamically stable by phonons.
  2. [Figs. 4(a–c); Table 2; Results on FQFE switching] Figs. 4(a–c), Table 2, and the +P/−P constructions: Ferroelectric reversal of the spin splitting is shown only via discrete endpoint states (A/C) and a spatial-inversion −P structure, plus an intermediate B state (+17.3 meV/f.u.) with Pb=0. There is no continuous switching path that remains inside the charge-ordered UUD-AFM manifold. Given the tiny gap to SAFM (which restores Tτ), an electric-field trajectory could decay into the non-functional ground state. A minimum-energy path or constrained polarization path, and an explicit statement of whether charge order and UUD order survive along it, are needed to support “fully switched by an electric field.”
  3. [Computational Methods; Table 1; Fig. S1] Computational Methods and Fig. S1: U_eff=4 eV is a free parameter that conditions energy ordering, gap, and charge order. The main text should quantify how the SAFM–UUD-AFM energy difference, the ~0.4 eV gap, the hybrid splitting amplitude (~140 meV), and the SP>99% claim vary with U_eff (and ideally a hybrid-functional or DFT+U+V check). Without this, the central device-facing numbers remain conditional on a single U choice.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Keywords; Fig. 2 caption; Results] Several typos and formatting issues: “conducitivity” (keywords); “Spinsaredenotedbyon-sitearrows”; “theorthorhombicunitcell”; “Evenconsideringthespin-orbitcoupling”; “regradless”; inconsistent spacing around units and subscripts throughout.
  2. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1(d) and related text: clarify early that the primitive-cell sketch is schematic and that the working magnetic cell/order is the orthorhombic/monoclinic UUD structure used later.
  3. [Results, polarization paragraph] FQFE discussion: the raw Berry-phase values (12.54 and 34.87 μC/cm²) vs residual magnetostrictive polarizations after deducting Q/3 and Q/2 should be stated more carefully in the main text so readers do not take the huge type-II values at face value.
  4. [Fig. 5; Computational Methods] Conductivity: state the assumed τ=10 fs and temperature (5 K) in the main text when quoting SP ratios, and note that SP ratios are more robust than absolute σ if τ is spin-independent.
  5. [References; SI citations] References: a few in-press/2025–2026 items are fine for a fast-moving area, but ensure key foundational altermagnet and compensated-ferrimagnet works are balanced and that SI figure callouts (S1–S9) are consistently numbered in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Standard forward DFT materials prediction; no derivation step reduces to its inputs by construction. Minor self-citations supply background only.

full rationale

The paper’s chain is ordinary first-principles workflow: candidate magnetic orders are enumerated, total energies and phonons are computed with a fixed external U_eff=4 eV (chosen from prior literature, not fitted to the target spin-polarization or switching), the near-degenerate UUD-AFM phase is selected (under strain), then bands, Berry-phase polarization, local moments, and Boltzmann conductivities are obtained as outputs. None of these quantities is redefined from the claimed hybrid splitting, SP>99 %, or P_b-switchability; the latter are read off the computed spectra and tensors. Self-citations (e.g., prior Dong-group works on magnetoelectricity, altermagnets, FQFE) appear only as methodological or contextual references and do not import a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the present results. The accessibility caveat (UUD-AFM 6.66 meV above SAFM) is a validity/ground-state issue, not circularity. Hence essentially zero circularity; the single point reflects routine self-citation without load-bearing reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Central claims rest on standard collinear DFT+U total-energy and band methodology plus Boltzmann transport with a fixed relaxation time. The only prominent numerical knob is U_eff on Fe 3d. Domain assumptions include the physical realizability of the metastable UUD-AFM monolayer under strain and the interpretation of Berry-phase polarization after subtracting polarization quanta. No new fundamental particles or forces are introduced; ‘hybrid spin-splitting’ and ‘hidden magnetoelectricity’ are descriptive labels for computed band and spin–charge responses.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U_eff on Fe 3d = 4 eV
    Fixed at 4 eV following prior Fe-oxide work; magnetic energy ordering, gap (~0.4 eV), and moments depend on this choice (Table 1; Methods; SI U scans).
  • Boltzmann relaxation time τ = 10 fs
    Constant τ=10 fs sets absolute conductivity scale in BoltzWann; spin-polarization ratios are less sensitive but still assume energy/spin-independent scattering (Computational Methods).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Collinear PBE+U DFT total energies and bands adequately rank magnetic orders and capture nonrelativistic spin splitting in Fe3O5.
    Entire phase diagram, gaps, and hybrid splitting are DFT outputs (Table 1, Fig. 3–4); no beyond-DFT many-body benchmark.
  • standard math Net magnetization of a gapped collinear insulator vanishes when N↑=N↓ occupied bands (integer band filling).
    Used to argue strict compensation M=μB(N↑−N↓)=0 even with tiny site moments (text after Fig. 3e).
  • domain assumption UUD-AFM can be stabilized by ~1.5% tensile strain and is dynamically stable (phonons).
    Required because SAFM is lower by 6.66 meV/f.u. at equilibrium (Fig. 3e, Table 1); without access to UUD-AFM the device claims fail.
  • domain assumption After subtracting polarization quanta (Q/3, Q/2), residual P is the physically relevant magnetostrictive ferroelectric component coupling to spins.
    FQFE discussion and residual Pa,Pb values underpin the multiferroic/ME interpretation (polarization paragraphs; Fig. S5).
  • domain assumption Constant-τ Boltzmann transport on Wannier-interpolated bands represents low-T spin-polarized conductivity anisotropy.
    Fig. 5 SP ratios and anisotropy come from this approximation (Methods; Fig. S9).
invented entities (2)
  • Hybrid altermagnetic-like + Zeeman spin-splitting mechanism in charge-ordered UUD Fe3O5
    purpose: Name the superposition of k-alternating and global Zeeman splittings claimed to enable both anisotropy and near-100% SP with electrical switchability.
    Descriptive composite of standard band-structure features under broken Tτ/PT with residual TR/TM; not a new interaction. Independent evidence would require ARPES/transport on a real sample.
  • Hidden magnetoelectricity via spin–charge coupling (mFe sign flip at M_net=0)
    purpose: Explain electric-field control of spin splitting without macroscopic magnetization change (Table 2).
    Computed site-moment redistribution under ±Pb; ‘hidden’ ME is an interpretation of DFT outputs already partly framed in authors’ prior magnetoelectricity reviews.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetic-like compensated ferrimagnets with charge ordering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X4VX4ZQL

@misc{pith2026260726971,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetic-like compensated ferrimagnets with charge ordering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X4VX4ZQL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26971}
}
abstract

Unconventional collinear magnets with almost zero magnetization but prominent nonrelativistic spin-splitting, such as altermagnets, can inherit the advantages of both ferromagnets and antiferromagnets. By incorporating more degrees of freedom such as ferroelectricity and charge ordering, these unconventional magnets can be even more interesting and functionalized. With this design principle, the Fe$_3$O$_5$ monolayer is predicted to exhibit a hybrid spin-splitting mechanism, with the superposition of the altermagnetic-like $k$-path alternating splitting and ferrimagnet-like Zeeman splitting. Benefiting from the hidden magnetoelectricity based on the spin-charge coupling, such spin-splitting can be fully switched by an electric field. Its conductivity is highly spin-polarized, with a polarization ratio above $99\%$, comparable to half-metals but with zero magnetization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26971 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of band splittings, including: (a) an altermagnetic-type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of seven most possible magnetic orders in Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electronic structures of SAFM and UUD-AFM phases of Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a-c) Top views of three UUD-AFM states. Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spin-dependent conductivity of UUD-AFM. (a) Anisotropic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry

    S S mejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12, 031042

    2022

  2. [2]

    Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism

    S S mejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12, 040501

    2022

  3. [3]

    S.; Gonzalez, O.; Bediako, D

    Fender, S. S.; Gonzalez, O.; Bediako, D. K. Altermagnetism: A chemical perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 2257--2274

    2025

  4. [4]

    Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current

    Ma, H.-Y.; Hu, M.; Li, N.; Liu, J.; Yao, W.; Jia, J.-F.; Liu, J. Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2846

    2021

  5. [5]

    Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering

    Hayami, S.; Yanagi, Y.; Kusunose, H. Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 88, 123702

    2019

  6. [6]

    Sliding Ferroelectric Control of Unconventional Magnetism in Stacked Bilayers

    Zhu, Y.; Gu, M.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Du, S.; Liu, Q. Sliding Ferroelectric Control of Unconventional Magnetism in Stacked Bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 135, 056801

    2025

  7. [7]

    A Large Spin-Splitting Altermagnet Designed from the Hydroxylated MBene Monolayer

    Yang, X.; Wang, S.-S.; Dong, S. A Large Spin-Splitting Altermagnet Designed from the Hydroxylated MBene Monolayer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, e17921

    2025

  8. [8]

    Twisted magnetic van der Waals bilayers: an ideal platform for altermagnetism

    Liu, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, C.-C. Twisted magnetic van der Waals bilayers: an ideal platform for altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 133, 206702

    2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Proposing altermagnetic-ferroelectric type- III multiferroics with robust magnetoelectric coupling

    Sun, W.; Yang, C.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.; Cheng, Z. Proposing altermagnetic-ferroelectric type- III multiferroics with robust magnetoelectric coupling. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2502575

    2025

  2. [10]

    H.; Amobi, G.; Pradhan, S.; Kutepov, A.; Belashchenko, K

    Zhang, Z.; Gamage, E. H.; Amobi, G.; Pradhan, S.; Kutepov, A.; Belashchenko, K. D.; Sun, Y.; Kovnir, K.; Antropov, V. Discovery and Synthesis of a Family of Boride Altermagnets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 30117--30135

    2025

  3. [11]

    Electric-Field-Controlled Altermagnetic Transition for Neuromorphic Computing

    Duan, Z.; Qin, P.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Zhao, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Meng, Z.; Li, J.; Jiang, S.; Tan, X.; Wu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. Electric-Field-Controlled Altermagnetic Transition for Neuromorphic Computing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 47330--47338

    2025

  4. [12]

    Symmetry-Driven Multiferroic Altermagnetism in Two-Dimensional Materials

    Che, Y.; Guo, Y.; Lv, H.; Wu, X.; Yang, J. Symmetry-Driven Multiferroic Altermagnetism in Two-Dimensional Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 5125--5131

    2026

  5. [13]

    Antiferroelectric Altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity Alters Magnets

    Duan, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Z Z uti c \' c , I.; Zhou, T. Antiferroelectric Altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity Alters Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 106801

    2025

  6. [14]

    Ferroelectric Switchable Altermagnetism

    Gu, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yananose, K.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y.; Stroppa, A.; Liu, Q. Ferroelectric Switchable Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 106802

    2025

  7. [15]

    Electrical tuning of robust layered antiferromagnetism in MXene monolayer

    Yang, X.; Ding, N.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; An, M.; Dong, S. Electrical tuning of robust layered antiferromagnetism in MXene monolayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 122, 162403

    2023

  8. [16]

    B.; Rondinelli, J

    Yuan, L.-D.; Georgescu, A. B.; Rondinelli, J. M. Nonrelativistic Spin Splitting at the Brillouin Zone Center in Compensated Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 133, 216701

    2024

  9. [17]

    Two-Dimensional Fully Compensated Ferrimagnetism

    Liu, Y.; Guo, S.-D.; Li, Y.; Liu, C.-C. Two-Dimensional Fully Compensated Ferrimagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 116703

    2025

  10. [18]

    Nonrelativistic spin-splitting multiferroic antiferromagnets and compensated ferrimagnet with zero net magnetization

    Dong, J.; Wu, K.; Zhu, M.; Zheng, F.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. Nonrelativistic spin-splitting multiferroic antiferromagnets and compensated ferrimagnet with zero net magnetization. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 112, 024425

    2025

  11. [19]

    Symmetry-Breaking Magneto-Optical Effects in Altermagnets

    Sun, J.; Du, Y.; Kan, E. Symmetry-Breaking Magneto-Optical Effects in Altermagnets. Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 14960--14966

    2025

  12. [20]

    Zhai, Y.; Yu, L.; Lv, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, H. J. Zeeman-type spin splittings in strained d -wave altermagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 112, 174411

    2025

  13. [21]

    B.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S

    Wang, J.; Neaton, J. B.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S. B.; Liu, B.; Viehland, D.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Schlom, D. G.; Waghmare, U. V.; Spaldin, N. A.; Rabe, K. M.; Wuttig, M.; Ramesh, R. Epitaxial BiFeO _3 Multiferroic Thin Film Heterostructures. Science 2003, 299, 1719--1722

    2003

  14. [22]

    Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization

    Kimura, T.; Goto, T.; Shintani, H.; Ishizaka, K.; Arima, T.; Tokura, Y. Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization. Nature 2003, 426, 55--58

    2003

  15. [23]

    Ferroelectricity-Driven Magnetism in a Metal Halide Monolayer

    Jiang, J.; Wu, F.; Wan, Y.; Li, A.; Huang, C.; Kan, E. Ferroelectricity-Driven Magnetism in a Metal Halide Monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 196801

    2025

  16. [24]

    Possibility of type- III multiferroics hosting d ^ 0 ferroelectricity and d ^ 0 ferromagnetism

    Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Ye, M.; Li, Y. Possibility of type- III multiferroics hosting d ^ 0 ferroelectricity and d ^ 0 ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 135, 226402

    2025

  17. [25]

    Alterferroicity with seesaw-type magnetoelectricity

    Wang, Z.; Dong, S. Alterferroicity with seesaw-type magnetoelectricity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2023, 120, e2305197120

    2023

  18. [26]

    Electric-field-induced switchable two-dimensional altermagnets

    Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H. Electric-field-induced switchable two-dimensional altermagnets. Nano Lett. 2024, 25, 498--503

    2024

  19. [27]

    Fully Electrically Controlled Generation and Switching of Spin-Polarized Currents in van der Waals Multiferroic Heterostructures

    Liu, G.; Ke, S.-H. Fully Electrically Controlled Generation and Switching of Spin-Polarized Currents in van der Waals Multiferroic Heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2026, 26, 2201--2207

    2026

  20. [28]

    P.; Gu, M.; Wang, J

    Su, M.; Zhang, D.; Ye, H.; Zhang, G. P.; Gu, M.; Wang, J. Interlayer-sliding controlled magneto-optical effect and ferrovalley in a fully compensated ferrimagnetic bilayer. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 112, 195427

    2025

  21. [29]

    Designed two dimensional triangle lattice Ti _3 X _5 (X=S, Se) : Stable quantum anomalous Hall states with high Chern number

    Xu, X.; Guo, T.; Liu, Y.; Chen, A.; Zhu, X.; Wang, S.; He, A.; Lu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Designed two dimensional triangle lattice Ti _3 X _5 (X=S, Se) : Stable quantum anomalous Hall states with high Chern number. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 163103

    2023

  22. [30]

    Ti _3 O _5 monolayer: Tunable quantum anomalous Hall insulator

    Xu, X.; Guo, T.; Guan, D.; Li, J.; He, A.; Lu, J.; Yao, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Ti _3 O _5 monolayer: Tunable quantum anomalous Hall insulator. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 214427

    2023

  23. [31]

    R.; Gomes, L

    Ortiz, B. R.; Gomes, L. C.; Morey, J. R.; Winiarski, M.; Bordelon, M.; Mangum, J. S.; Oswald, I. W. H.; Rodriguez-Rivera, J. A.; Neilson, J. R.; Wilson, S. D.; Ertekin, E.; McQueen, T. M.; Toberer, E. S. New kagome prototype materials: discovery of KV _ 3 Sb _ 5 , RbV _ 3 Sb _...

    2019

  24. [32]

    Yang, H. et al. Superconductivity and nematic order in a new titanium-based kagome metal CsTi _3 Bi _5 without charge density wave order. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9626

    2024

  25. [33]

    Magnetoelectricity in multiferroics: a theoretical perspective

    Dong, S.; Xiang, H.; Dagotto, E. Magnetoelectricity in multiferroics: a theoretical perspective. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 629--641

    2019

  26. [34]

    A.; Gegenwart, P

    Li, Y.; Bachus, S.; Deng, H.; Schmidt, W.; Thoma, H.; Hutanu, V.; Tokiwa, Y.; Tsirlin, A. A.; Gegenwart, P. Partial Up-Up-Down Order with the Continuously Distributed Order Parameter in the Triangular Antiferromagnet TmMgGaO _ 4 . Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 011007

    2020

  27. [35]

    Ji, J.; Yu, G.; Xu, C.; Xiang, H. J. Fractional quantum ferroelectricity. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 135

    2024

  28. [36]

    Yu, G.; Ji, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, C.; Xiang, H. J. Symmetry Strategy for Rapid Discovery of Abundant Fractional Quantum Ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 016801

    2025

  29. [37]

    Generalized N eumann's Principle as a Unified Framework for Fractional Quantum and Conventional Ferroelectricity

    Pang, H.; He, L. Generalized N eumann's Principle as a Unified Framework for Fractional Quantum and Conventional Ferroelectricity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 135, 116402

    2025

  30. [38]

    Ionic Sliding Ferroelectricity in Layered Ion Conductors

    Yan, Y.; Wu, M. Ionic Sliding Ferroelectricity in Layered Ion Conductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 135, 236801

    2025

  31. [39]

    Dou, M.; Wang, X.; Tao, L. L. Anisotropic spin-polarized conductivity in collinear altermagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 111, 224423

    2025

  32. [40]

    Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism

    Gonz\'alez-Hern\'andez, R.; S S mejkal, L.; V\'yborn\'y, K.; Yahagi, Y.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T.; Z Z elezn\'y, J. Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 127701

    2021

  33. [41]

    Ultrahigh charge-to-spin conversion and tunneling magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional d-wave altermagnet

    Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Dong, J.; Su, Y.; Zhang, J. Ultrahigh charge-to-spin conversion and tunneling magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional d-wave altermagnet. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2026, 128, 152401

    2026

  34. [42]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse, G.; Furthm \"u ller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169

    1996

  35. [43]

    P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865

    1996

  36. [44]

    L.; Botton, G

    Dudarev, S. L.; Botton, G. A.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Humphreys, C. J.; Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA + U study. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 1505

    1998

  37. [45]

    Molecular ferroelectric with low-magnetic-field magnetoelectricity at room temperature

    Hu, Z.-B.; Yang, X.; Gui, L.-A.; Liu, X.-D.; Zhou, Z.-H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, S.; Song, Y. Molecular ferroelectric with low-magnetic-field magnetoelectricity at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4702

    2024

  38. [46]

    First principles phonon calculations in materials science

    Togo, A.; Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 2015, 108, 1--5

    2015

  39. [47]

    D.; Vanderbilt, D

    King-Smith, R. D.; Vanderbilt, D. Theory of polarization of crystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 1651--1654

    1993

  40. [48]

    BoltzWann: A code for the evaluation of thermoelectric and electronic transport properties with a maximally-localized wannier functions basis

    Pizzi, G.; Volja, D.; Kozinsky, B.; Fornari, M.; Marzari, N. BoltzWann: A code for the evaluation of thermoelectric and electronic transport properties with a maximally-localized wannier functions basis. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2014, 185, 422--429

    2014

  41. [49]

    Pizzi, G. et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 165902

    2020

  42. [50]

    A.; Yates, J

    Mostofi, A. A.; Yates, J. R.; Lee, Y.-S.; Souza, I.; Vanderbilt, D.; Marzari, N. Wannier90: a tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2008, 178, 685--699 mcitethebibliography

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.