Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 118 references

Formation of $\mathrm{L}1_2$-ordered $\gamma'$-$\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{Al}$ precipitates in ternary Cu-Ni-Al alloys modelled using an ab initio concentration wave theory and atomistic simulations

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First-principles modelling recovers three composition-dependent regimes of L12 Ni3Al precipitation in Cu–Ni–Al, matching experiment.

desk verdict Clean application of their established S^(2)+EPI+MC pipeline to Cu–Ni–Al that recovers the known three-regime topology with honest caveats; the pair-model energetics check is the one real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27108 v1 pith:25M4N4NZ submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph

Christopher D. Woodgate , Hubert J. Naguszewski , Samuel L. Deacon , Mathys P. Potel , Ján Minár , David Quigley , Julie B. Staunton This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-ph
keywords Cu-Ni-AlalloysL12Ni3AlprecipitationconcentrationwavetheoryeffectivepairinteractionsMonteCarlosimulationcoherentKKR-CPAstrengthening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a parameter-free computational workflow—ab initio electronic structure, concentration-wave analysis, and lattice Monte Carlo—can capture both chemical ordering and coherent precipitation in the technologically important Cu–Ni–Al system. Along the pseudobinary line Cu_x(Ni3/4Al1/4)1−x it finds three distinct regimes: Cu dissolved in ordered Ni3Al at low copper content, sequential ordering then phase separation at intermediate content, and direct precipitation of L12 Ni3Al from the solid solution at high copper content. Those regimes line up qualitatively with the experimental phase diagram. The same calculations link the behaviour to electronic structure: strong Al–Ni p–d hybridisation drives ordering, while copper’s lower-lying d bands leave it relatively inert and eventually expelled. A sympathetic reader cares because the workflow offers a practical route to studying precipitation strengthening without empirical fitting, while still connecting microstructure to the underlying electronic mechanisms.

What carries the argument

Ab initio concentration-wave (S^(2)) analysis of the disordered CPA medium, which yields reciprocal-space second concentration derivatives of the internal energy that are inverted to real-space atom–atom effective pair interactions for fixed-lattice Monte Carlo (Wang–Landau and Metropolis) sampling.

What would settle it

Recompute the same compositions with vibrational entropy (or off-lattice relaxations) included and check whether the three-regime topology survives and whether the high-Cu precipitation temperature moves downward toward the experimental ~1020 K at x≈0.8.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Across the pseudobinary Cu_x(Ni3/4Al1/4)1−x system the model produces three composition-dependent regimes of phase behaviour in qualitative agreement with experiment: at low Cu, a single Ni–Al L12 ordering transition with Cu soluble in the ordered phase; at intermediate Cu, high-temperature L12 ordering followed by lower-temperature separation of Cu from L12 Ni3Al; and at high Cu, direct precipitation of L12 Ni3Al from the ternary solid solution with no separate secondary transition.

Load-bearing premise

The entire phase diagram is built from a fixed-lattice configurational model that ignores vibrational free-energy differences between ordered and disordered phases, so all transition temperatures are expected to be substantially too high.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At copper-rich compositions the model predicts that L12 Ni3Al precipitates directly, leaving a near-pure Cu matrix that should retain good electrical and thermal conductivity while the precipitates harden the alloy.
  • The same workflow can be used to screen other multicomponent solid solutions for coherent precipitation without empirical interaction parameters.
  • Smooth composition dependence of the recovered pair interactions suggests that sparse sampling plus interpolation can map larger ternary or higher-order composition spaces at modest cost.
  • Electronic-structure diagnostics (p–d hybridisation versus inert late-transition-metal d bands) supply a physical criterion for when ordering and phase separation will compete.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the method already recovers both ordering and separation from one set of EPIs, it is a natural candidate for mapping how small quaternary additions (e.g., Cr, Fe, or Zn) shift the high-Cu precipitation boundary and precipitate volume fraction.
  • The large calculated enthalpy gain from Al–Ni ordering versus the smaller gain from Cu expulsion implies that processing windows that freeze in dissolved Cu inside L12 Ni3Al would degrade transport properties—an experimentally testable materials-design rule.
  • Extending the concentration-wave step to finite magnetic moments or to vibrational free-energy corrections would turn the present qualitative phase-diagram topology into a quantitative design tool for precipitation-strengthened conductors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies an established ab initio workflow — KKR-CPA electronic structure of the disordered solid solution, a multicomponent concentration-wave (S^(2)) analysis yielding a Landau-type stability criterion, extraction of real-space effective pair interactions (EPIs), and fixed-lattice Wang–Landau/Metropolis Monte Carlo — to the Cu_x(Ni_3/4Al_1/4)_1−x pseudobinary. The authors report three composition-dependent regimes: (i) at low x, Cu dissolves in L1_2 Ni3Al with a single (virtual) Ni–Al ordering transition; (ii) at intermediate x, high-temperature L1_2 ordering with Cu soluble is followed at lower temperature by Cu/Ni3Al phase separation; (iii) at high x, L1_2 Ni3Al precipitates directly from the solid solution with a single transition. The inferred diagram agrees qualitatively with the experimental pseudobinary diagram of Semboshi et al. (J. Alloys Compd. 921, 166124 (2022)), including a Cu solubility limit near x ≈ 0.1. Bloch spectral function calculations attribute the ordering to strong Al(p)–Ni(d) hybridisation and the Cu expulsion to the energetic offset of the Cu and Ni 3d complexes. Transition temperatures are acknowledged to be overestimated because vibrational entropy and melting are neglected.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper delivers a parameter-free, fully ab initio workflow — KKR-CPA electronic structure, multicomponent concentration-wave theory including charge rearrangement, and Wang–Landau Monte Carlo — that reproduces the experimentally observed pseudobinary phase behaviour of a technologically relevant precipitation-strengthened alloy, while also providing an electronic-structure rationalisation (Al(p)–Ni(d) hybridisation driving ordering; Cu–Ni d-band mismatch driving expulsion of Cu). Specific strengths worth naming: the method is free of empirically fitted parameters; the simulations resolve the L1_2 vs D0_22 ambiguity that the mean-field theory cannot; the comparison against the experimental diagram of Semboshi et al. is a genuinely falsifiable external check; and the work is reproducible, with an open dataset (Zenodo) and simulations performed with the published open-source BraWl package. The Cu–Ni–Al pseudobinary is also a demanding test case for any method that must capture ordering and phase separation within a single Hamiltonian, so this is a useful benchmark demonstration beyond the specific system.

major comments (2)
  1. [§II C, Eq. (6); §III D, Fig. 7] The Hamiltonian of Eq. (6), with EPIs defined as V = −S^(2) about the homogeneous disordered CPA reference (Secs. II B–C) and truncated to six fcc shells, is used via Wang–Landau sampling to simulate configurations far from that reference: fully L1_2-ordered Ni3Al and macroscopically Cu-separated two-phase states. Three-body and higher terms are dropped by construction. The manuscript itself contains an available benchmark that is never used: Sec. III E reports direct KKR-CPA enthalpy differences (A1→L1_2 at x=0: 315 meV/atom; at x=0.25: 183 meV/atom for ordering with Cu dissolved, 259 meV/atom for full separation). The authors should evaluate Eq. (6) on these same configuration pairs and report the comparison. If the pair model mis-weights ordering vs. separation energetics by even a modest factor, the relative placement of the two specific-heat peaks — and hence the identification of a
  2. [§III D and Appendix A.3] All WL simulations use a single cell of 8×8×8 fcc unit cells (2048 atoms) with periodic boundaries. Phase separation on a fixed lattice in a small periodic cell is known to be sensitive to finite-size effects: miscibility-gap temperatures can be underestimated, and small-cell commensurability can artificially sharpen or merge transitions. The central evidence for the intermediate-x regime is the splitting of one specific-heat peak into two, with the lower-T peak described as 'smaller, broader' — precisely the signature most vulnerable to finite-size smearing. No convergence test in system size is reported. A repeat at a second size (e.g. 12^3 or 16^3 cells) at a few representative compositions (x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.8) would establish whether the two-peak structure and the regime boundary near x ≈ 0.1 are robust, and is inexpensive relative to the calculations already performed.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§III A and Appendix A.1a] The manuscript switches from full-potential PBE (lattice parameters, bulk moduli) to LDA/ASA for the concentration wave analysis. The justification (prior insensitivity to lattice parameter) is reasonable, but a one-line quantitative statement of how much the x=0 EPIs or T_ord shift between the two settings would preempt the obvious question, since the PBE under-binding caveat is itself raised for the structural data.
  2. [§III D] The neglect of vibrational free-energy differences is disclosed and a 30% reduction of T_ord for Ni3Al (Ref. 91) is cited, but the discussion frames the effect purely as a uniform shift of temperatures. Since ordered and separated phases differ in stiffness (Fig. 4, bottom), vibrational entropy could also shift the topology, not just the scale. A sentence acknowledging this — and noting which regime boundaries are most/least sensitive — would strengthen Sec. III D.
  3. [Supplemental Material] The ASRO axes in Figs. S17–S20 extend to very large negative values (down to −40) as Al becomes dilute; α_pq_n is unbounded below for c_q → 0, so these magnitudes mostly reflect dilution rather than physical ordering strength. A brief note in the SM caption would help readers interpret the high-x panels.
  4. [Appendix A.1b] The non-magnetic treatment is justified by a DLM test at x=0 only (the highest Ni content), which is the right worst-case choice, but the text should state explicitly that local-moment collapse was checked at the optimised lattice parameter and whether any composition dependence was sampled.
  5. [Supplemental Material / Ref. 94] The SM URL placeholder 'URL will be inserted by publisher' should be replaced with the Zenodo DOI before publication; also the duplicated C_V panels (linear and zoomed) in each SM figure would benefit from axis labels distinguishing them.
  6. [References] Ref. 66: 'agitaion' → 'agitation'. Also 'ferronmagnetism' in Ref. 95 is reproduced from the original title, which is fine, but worth a check against the journal's style.
  7. [§III A] The claim that the bulk-modulus trend supports 'modulus mismatch strengthening' is plausible but soft as stated; consider citing or briefly noting that coherent strengthening here is primarily misfit-strain and order-strengthening driven, with modulus mismatch a secondary contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: phase regimes are sampled from ab initio EPIs and compared to external experiment, not forced by construction or self-citation.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is (i) KKR-CPA internal energy of the disordered solid solution, (ii) S^(2) concentration derivatives and recovered pair EPIs V=−S^(2), (iii) independent Wang–Landau Monte Carlo on the fixed-lattice Bragg–Williams Hamiltonian, (iv) comparison of the resulting specific-heat peaks and ASRO to the external experimental pseudobinary diagram of Semboshi et al. and binary Ni3Al literature. None of these steps defines the three-regime topology in terms of the experimental answer, nor fits interaction parameters to that diagram. Self-citations (e.g. Refs. 45–48, 58, 63) supply the multicomponent S^(2)/EPI formalism and prior validation on other Al-bearing alloys; they do not encode the Cu–Ni–Al phase boundaries. Direct KKR-CPA enthalpy differences in Sec. III E are independent electronic-structure diagnostics, not circular inputs to the MC diagram. Concerns that the pair Hamiltonian is only a second-order expansion about the disordered reference (and neglects vibrations) are approximation/correctness issues, not circularity: the predicted regimes are not tautological with the method’s inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central phase-topology claim rests on standard DFT/CPA electronic structure, the multicomponent S^(2) concentration-wave linear response, a pairwise Bragg–Williams map of those responses, and fixed-lattice Monte Carlo. No new physical entities are postulated. The main domain assumptions are the sufficiency of pairwise EPIs on a rigid fcc lattice, neglect of vibrational and magnetic free energy at the relevant temperatures, and the ASA+LDA treatment used for S^(2). Free parameters are technical (shell truncation, WL binning/tolerance), not fitted to the experimental phase boundaries.

free parameters (3)
  • EPI real-space truncation (six fcc coordination shells) = n ≤ 6 (e.g. r_cut ≈ 6.2 Å at x=0)
    Chosen because EPIs are short-ranged in the recovered data; cutoff is a modeling choice that affects the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian.
  • Wang–Landau numerical tolerances = log(f)=1e-10; 85% flatness; 1024 bins; 2048-atom cell
    log(f) tolerance, flatness criterion, bin count, and supercell size control the sampled density of states and thus peak positions in CV.
  • Composition sampling grid in x = Δx = 0.05
    21 evenly spaced compositions (Δx=0.05) define the resolution of the reported phase diagram.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption KKR-CPA describes the average electronic structure and internal energy of the substitutional solid solution sufficiently for second concentration derivatives.
    Foundational to Sec. II A–B; standard in the field but approximate for systems with large local relaxations or charge transfers.
  • domain assumption The alloy free-energy cost of chemical fluctuations is captured by the chemical stability matrix [β−1 C−1 − S^(2)(k)] (Landau-type mean-field theory).
    Eq. (5); used to infer dominant ordering vectors and mean-field T_us.
  • domain assumption S^(2) maps onto a pairwise, translationally invariant Bragg–Williams Hamiltonian adequate for Monte Carlo phase equilibria.
    Eq. (6) and Sec. II C; multi-body interactions and concentration dependence beyond the reference medium are neglected.
  • domain assumption Fixed underlying fcc lattice; no vibrational entropy, no off-lattice relaxations, no liquid/melting.
    Stated repeatedly (abstract workflow, Sec. III D, IV); known to overestimate ordering temperatures when ordered phase is stiffer.
  • domain assumption Alloys treated as non-magnetic (itinerant paramagnet) because self-consistent DLM moments collapse for Ni3Al endpoints.
    Appendix A 1 b; justified for T above relevant Curie points but omits magneto-chemical coupling.
  • domain assumption Lattice parameters from full-potential PBE; S^(2) and EPIs from ASA+LDA at those volumes.
    Appendix A 1 a; mixed XC/shape approximation required by present S^(2) implementation.
  • standard math Standard DFT, statistical mechanics, and Monte Carlo sampling mathematics (Metropolis, Wang–Landau, Warren–Cowley ASRO).
    Used throughout Sec. II without modification of the underlying formalisms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Formation of $\mathrm{L}1_2$-ordered $\gamma'$-$\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{Al}$ precipitates in ternary Cu-Ni-Al alloys modelled using an ab initio concentration wave theory and atomistic simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/25M4N4NZ

@misc{pith2026260727108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Formation of $\mathrmL1_2$-ordered $\gamma'$-$\mathrmNi_3\mathrmAl$ precipitates in ternary Cu-Ni-Al alloys modelled using an ab initio concentration wave theory and atomistic simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/25M4N4NZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27108}
}
abstract

Precipitation-strengthened Cu-Ni-Al alloys are of interest for technological applications because coherent, $\mathrm{L}1_2$-ordered $\gamma'$-$\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{Al}$ precipitates can confer high mechanical strength while allowing the material to retain many of the good transport properties characteristic of elemental Cu. In this work, we study the thermodynamics and phase stability of the pseudobinary $\textrm{Cu}_x (\textrm{Ni}_{3/4} \textrm{Al}_{1/4})_{1-x}$ system, $0 \leq x \leq 1$. We use a computational modelling framework combining first-principles electronic structure calculations with a concentration wave analysis from which atom-atom effective pair interactions are extracted for use in atomistic Monte Carlo simulations. Our modelling reveals three distinct, composition-dependent regimes of phase behaviour, in qualitative agreement with the experimentally determined phase diagram. At low Cu content, Cu is soluble in the $\mathrm{L}1_2$-ordered $\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{Al}$ phase, with a single identifiable phase transition corresponding to chemical ordering between Ni and Al. At intermediate compositions, this high-temperature ordering is followed at lower temperatures by phase separation of Cu and $\mathrm{L}1_2$-ordered $\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{Al}$. Finally, at high Cu content, $\mathrm{L}1_2$-ordered $\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{Al}$ precipitates directly from the solid solution, with no clearly identifiable secondary transition. We relate these phase transformations to features of the underlying electronic structures of the considered alloys. Overall, this work demonstrates a computationally efficient workflow capturing both chemical ordering and coherent precipitation in multicomponent substitutional alloys, with relevance to the study of phenomena such as precipitation strengthening.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27108 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Conceptual illustration of (a) a disordered fcc (A1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. An overview of the computational workflow used in this work for studying the phase behaviour of Cu–Ni–Al alloys. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Illustration of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. DFT-calculated optimised lattice parameters (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Data associated with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Selected calculated atom-atom effective pair interactions for the Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Overview of the inferred pseudobinary phase diagram (a), with phase boundaries recovered from the raw specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Indicative equilibrium atomic arrangements for the Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Bloch spectral function (band structure) and elec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Details of the evolving electronic structure of the Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electronic structure calculations a. DFT parameters For an accurate description of the structural proper- ties of these alloys, we perform scalar-relativistic full- potential (i.e.without shape restriction on the atom- centred potentials) calculations using the all-electron SPR-KKRpackage [53, 101], which implements the KKR formulation [51, 52, 57] of DFT...

  2. [2]

    This code makes use of an adaptive mesh- ing scheme for Brillouin zone integrations [115]

    Concentration wave analysis An in-house implementation of theS (2) theory for mul- ticomponent alloys is used to perform the concentration wave analysis. This code makes use of an adaptive mesh- ing scheme for Brillouin zone integrations [115]. The quantityS (2) αα′(k), which varies smoothly as a function ofk, is evaluated for each composition at a total ...

  3. [3]

    Monte Carlo simulations The Monte Carlo simulations within this study were performed using theBrawlpackage [72]; the parallelisa- tion strategies employed for the WL sampling algorithm are discussed in Ref. 73. Within our WL simulations, the density of states histograms for Cux(Ni3/4Al1/4)1−x were obtained using a system of 8×8×8 fcc cubic unit cells cons...

  4. [4]

    Campbell, ed.,Elements of Metallurgy and Engineer- ing Alloys(ASM International, 2008)

    F. Campbell, ed.,Elements of Metallurgy and Engineer- ing Alloys(ASM International, 2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch,Materials sci- ence and engineering: an introduction, 10th ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Tsuda, T

    H. Tsuda, T. Ito, and Y. Nakayama, The improvement of microstructures and mechanical properties in Cu- Ni-Al alloys by two-step ageing, Scr. Metall.20, 1555 (1986)

    1986

  7. [7]

    Cho, Y.-H

    Y.-R. Cho, Y.-H. Kim, and T. Dong Lee, Precipitation hardening and recrystallization in Cu-4% to 7% Ni-3% Al alloys, J. Mater. Sci.26, 2879 (1991)

    1991

  8. [8]

    Grylls, C

    R. Grylls, C. Tuck, and M. Loretto, Strengthening of a cupronickel alloy by an ordered L1 2 phase, Inter- metallics4, 567 (1996)

    1996

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    Sierpi´ nski and J

    Z. Sierpi´ nski and J. Gryziecki, Phase transformations and strengthening during ageing of CuNi 10Al3 alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A264, 279 (1999)

    1999

  2. [10]

    Wang, S.-W

    C.-H. Wang, S.-W. Chen, C.-H. Chang, and J.-C. Wu, Phase equilibria of the ternary Al-Cu-Ni system and interfacial reactions of related systems at 800°C, Metall. Mater. Trans. A34, 199 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    K. A. Christofidou, K. J. Robinson, P. M. Mignanelli, E. J. Pickering, N. G. Jones, and H. J. Stone, The effect of heat treatment on precipitation in the Cu-Ni-Al alloy Hiduron®130, Mater. Sci. Eng. A692, 192 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Z. Li, X. Li, C. Wang, Y. Zheng, Q. Yu, X. Cheng, N. Li, L. Bi, Q. Wang, and C. Dong, Comparative studies on microstructures and properties of Cu–Ni–M alloys con- trolled by strong interaction between elements, J. Alloys Compd.805, 404 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    C. G. Ferguson, K. A. Christofidou, E. M. Hildyard, A. S. Wilson, N. G. Jones, and H. J. Stone, On the continuous and discontinuous precipitation of the L1 2 phase in Cu-Ni-Al alloys, Materialia13, 100855 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Z. Li, X. Li, Y. Hu, Y. Zheng, M. Yang, N. Li, L. Bi, R. Liu, Q. Wang, C. Dong, Y. Jiang, and X. Zhang, Cuboidalγ ′ phase coherent precipitation-strengthened Cu–Ni–Al alloys with high softening temperature, Acta Mater.203, 116458 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Z. Li, X. Li, J. Yuan, Y. Hu, Y. Zheng, Z. Cheng, R. Liu, C. Bao, and C. Dong, Strong elemental interaction en- hances the thermal stability of coherent precipitation strengthened Cu–Ni–Al alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A827, 141955 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Semboshi, R

    S. Semboshi, R. Hariki, T. Shuto, H. Hyodo, Y. Ka- neno, and N. Masahashi, Age-Induced Precipitating and Strengthening Behaviors in a Cu–Ni–Al Alloy, Metall. Mater. Trans. A52, 4934 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Zhang, L

    S. Zhang, L. Wu, T. Gu, Y. Shi, X. Tian, H. Li, H. Hou, and Y. Zhao, Effect of microstructure on the mechani- cal properties of ultrafine-grained Cu-Al-Ni alloys pro- 16 cessed by deformation and annealing, J. Alloys Compd. 923, 166413 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    S. Li, C. Song, Y. Li, J. Ge, Z. Li, Y. Zheng, L. Li, and J. Li, Resistivity-temperature behavior of Cu-Ni- Al alloys strengthened by coherent precipitation within a wide composition range, Vacuum240, 114578 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Cheng, M

    X. Cheng, M. Zhao, Y. Zhao, and C. Dong, Composition Formulas of Cu-Ni-Al Cupronickel Alloys Derived by the Cluster Plus Glue Atoms Model, Materials18, 4288 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Semboshi, T

    S. Semboshi, T. Anno, and Y. Kaneno, Phase diagram of the Cu–Ni 3Al pseudo-binary system, J. Alloys Compd. 921, 166124 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Royer, P

    A. Royer, P. Bastie, and M. Veron, In situ determination ofγ ′ phase volume fraction and of relations between lattice parameters and precipitate morphology in Ni- based single crystal superalloy, Acta Mater.46, 5357 (1998)

    1998

  14. [22]

    Murakumo, T

    T. Murakumo, T. Kobayashi, Y. Koizumi, and H. Harada, Creep behaviour of Ni-base single-crystal su- peralloys with variousγ ′ volume fraction, Acta Mater. 52, 3737 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    R. Li, H. Kang, Z. Chen, G. Fan, C. Zou, W. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Lu, J. Jie, Z. Cao, T. Li, and T. Wang, A promising structure for fabricating high strength and high electrical conductivity copper alloys, Sci. Rep.6, 20799 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Zhang, R

    S. Zhang, R. Li, H. Kang, Z. Chen, W. Wang, C. Zou, T. Li, and T. Wang, A high strength and high electrical conductivity Cu-Cr-Zr alloy fabricated by cryorolling and intermediate aging treatment, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 680, 108 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Y. Fu, Q. Pan, Z. Cao, S. Li, and Y. Huo, Strength and electrical conductivity behavior of nanoparticles re- action on new alumina dispersion-strengthened copper alloy, J. Alloys Compd.798, 616 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA 3for three- dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr.44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Miettinen, Thermodynamic description of the Cu–Al–Ni system at the Cu–Ni side, Calphad29, 40 (2005)

    J. Miettinen, Thermodynamic description of the Cu–Al–Ni system at the Cu–Ni side, Calphad29, 40 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    M. A. Turchanin, P. G. Agraval, and A. R. Abdulov, Phase equilibria and thermodynamics of binary copper systems with 3d-metals. VI. Copper-nickel system, Pow- der Metall. Met. Ceram.46, 467 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Wang, H.-L

    W. Wang, H.-L. Chen, H. Larsson, and H. Mao, Ther- modynamic constitution of the Al–Cu–Ni system mod- eled by CALPHAD and ab initio methodology for de- signing high entropy alloys, Calphad65, 346 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Davey, N.-D

    T. Davey, N.-D. Tran, A. Saengdeejing, and Y. Chen, First-principles-only CALPHAD phase diagram of the solid aluminium-nickel (Al-Ni) system, Calphad71, 102008 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    B. Dong, J. Jie, S. Wang, Z. Dong, T. Wang, and T. Li, Novel insight into precipitation behavior ofγ′ phase par- ticles in Cu–15Ni-xAl alloys through Calphad method, Intermetallics120, 106749 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    B. Dong, G. Peng, Z. Wu, X. Shan, C. Guo, J. Miao, J. Qu, W. Luo, J. Jie, and T. Li, A CALPHAD-MD cou- pled method to reveal the strengthening mechanism in precipitation-strengthening Cu-Ni-Al alloy with evolv- ing microstructures, Int. J. Plast.162, 103540 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Eisenbach, Z

    M. Eisenbach, Z. Pei, and X. Liu, First-principles study of order-disorder transitions in multicomponent solid- solution alloys, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter31, 273002 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Mishin, Atomistic modeling of theγandγ ′ phases of the Ni–Al system, Acta Mater.52, 1451 (2004)

    Y. Mishin, Atomistic modeling of theγandγ ′ phases of the Ni–Al system, Acta Mater.52, 1451 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    C. W. Rosenbrock, K. Gubaev, A. V. Shapeev, L. B. P´ artay, N. Bernstein, G. Cs´ anyi, and G. L. W. Hart, Machine-learned interatomic potentials for alloys and alloy phase diagrams, npj Comput. Mater.7, 24 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Woodward, A

    C. Woodward, A. Van De Walle, M. Asta, and D. Trin- kle, First-principles study of interfacial boundaries in Ni-Ni3Al, Acta Mater.75, 60 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    W. Shao, J. M. Guevara-Vela, A. Fern´ andez-Caballero, S. Liu, and J. LLorca, Accurate prediction of the solid- state region of the Ni-Al phase diagram including config- urational and vibrational entropy and magnetic effects, Acta Mater.253, 118962 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Ekborg-Tanner, P

    P. Ekborg-Tanner, P. Rosander, E. Fransson, and P. Er- hart, Construction and Sampling of Alloy Cluster Ex- pansions—A Tutorial, PRX Energy3, 042001 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Soven, Coherent-Potential Model of Substitutional Disordered Alloys, Phys

    P. Soven, Coherent-Potential Model of Substitutional Disordered Alloys, Phys. Rev.156, 809 (1967)

    1967

  32. [40]

    B. L. Gy˝ orffy, Coherent-Potential Approximation for a Nonoverlapping-Muffin-Tin-Potential Model of Random Substitutional Alloys, Phys. Rev. B5, 2382 (1972)

    1972

  33. [41]

    G. M. Stocks, W. M. Temmerman, and B. L. Gy˝ orffy, Complete Solution of the Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Coherent-Potential-Approximation Equations: Cu-Ni Alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 339 (1978)

    1978

  34. [42]

    P. E. A. Turchi, G. M. Stocks, W. H. Butler, D. M. Nicholson, and A. Gonis, First-principles study of or- dering properties of substitutional alloys using the gen- eralized perturbation method, Phys. Rev. B37, 5982 (1988)

    1988

  35. [43]

    J. D. Althoff, D. D. Johnson, F. J. Pinski, and J. B. Staunton, Electronic origins of ordering in multicompo- nent metallic alloys: Application to the Cu-Ni-Zn sys- tem, Phys. Rev. B53, 10610 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    A. V. Ruban, S. Shallcross, S. I. Simak, and H. L. Skriver, Atomic and magnetic configurational energet- ics by the generalized perturbation method, Phys. Rev. B70, 125115 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    Singh, A

    P. Singh, A. V. Smirnov, and D. D. Johnson, Atomic short-range order and incipient long-range order in high- entropy alloys, Phys. Rev. B91, 224204 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    A. G. Khachaturyan, Ordering in substitutional and in- terstitial solid solutions, Prog. Mater. Sci.22, 1 (1978)

    1978

  39. [47]

    B. L. Gy˝ orffy and G. M. Stocks, Concentration Waves and Fermi Surfaces in Random Metallic Alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 374 (1983)

    1983

  40. [48]

    S. N. Khan, J. B. Staunton, and G. M. Stocks, Statisti- cal physics of multicomponent alloys using KKR-CPA, Phys. Rev. B93, 054206 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    C. D. Woodgate and J. B. Staunton, Compositional phase stability in medium-entropy and high-entropy Cantor-Wu alloys from anab initioall-electron Landau- type theory and atomistic modeling, Phys. Rev. B105, 115124 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    C. D. Woodgate and J. B. Staunton, Short-range or- der and compositional phase stability in refractory high- entropy alloys via first-principles theory and atomistic modeling: NbMoTa, NbMoTaW, and VNbMoTaW, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 013801 (2023). 17

    2023

  43. [51]

    C. D. Woodgate,Modelling Atomic Arrangements in Multicomponent Alloys: A Perturbative, First- Principles-Based Approach, Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 346 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    D. D. Johnson, D. M. Nicholson, F. J. Pinski, B. L. Gy˝ orffy, and G. M. Stocks, Density-Functional Theory for Random Alloys: Total Energy within the Coherent- Potential Approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 2088 (1986)

  45. [53]

    D. D. Johnson, D. M. Nicholson, F. J. Pinski, B. L. Gy˝ orffy, and G. M. Stocks, Total-energy and pres- sure calculations for random substitutional alloys, Phys. Rev. B41, 9701 (1990)

    1990

  46. [54]

    Korringa, On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal, Physica13, 392 (1947)

    J. Korringa, On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal, Physica13, 392 (1947)

    1947

  47. [55]

    Kohn and N

    W. Kohn and N. Rostoker, Solution of the Schr¨ odinger Equation in Periodic Lattices with an Application to Metallic Lithium, Phys. Rev.94, 1111 (1954)

    1954

  48. [56]

    Ebert, D

    H. Ebert, D. K¨ odderitzsch, and J. Min´ ar, Calculating condensed matter properties using the KKR-Green’s function method—recent developments and applica- tions, Rep. Prog. Phys.74, 096501 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  50. [58]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  51. [59]

    R. O. Jones, Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 897 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    J. S. Faulkner, G. M. Stocks, and Y. Wang,Multiple Scattering Theory: Electronic Structure of Solids, 1st ed. (IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    C. D. Woodgate, G. A. Marchant, L. B. P´ artay, and J. B. Staunton, Structure, short-range order, and phase stability of the Al xCrFeCoNi high-entropy alloy: in- sights from a perturbative, DFT-based analysis, npj Comput. Mater.10, 271 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. D. Woodgate, G. Hadjipanayis, J. B. Staunton, and L. H. Lewis, Tailoring microstructures with mild magnetic-field processing: A case study of CuNiFe alloys, Acta Mater.307, 121965 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    J. B. Staunton, D. D. Johnson, and F. J. Pinski, Com- positional short-range ordering in metallic alloys: Band- filling, charge-transfer, and size effects from a first- principles all-electron Landau-type theory, Phys. Rev. B50, 1450 (1994)

    1994

  56. [64]

    D. D. Johnson, J. B. Staunton, and F. J. Pinski, First- principles all-electron theory of atomic short-range or- dering in metallic alloys: D0 22- versus L1 2-like correla- tions, Phys. Rev. B50, 1473 (1994)

    1994

  57. [65]

    J. F. Clark, F. J. Pinski, D. D. Johnson, P. A. Sterne, J. B. Staunton, and B. Ginatempo, van Hove Singularity Induced L1 1 Ordering in CuPt, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3225 (1995)

    1995

  58. [66]

    C. D. Woodgate, H. J. Naguszewski, D. Redka, J. Min´ ar, D. Quigley, and J. B. Staunton, Emergent B2 chemical orderings in the AlTiVNb and AlTiCrMo refractory high-entropy superalloys studied via first- principles theory and atomistic modelling, J. Phys.: Mater.8, 045002 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    C. D. Woodgate, H. J. Naguszewski, N. F. Piwek, and D. Redka, Electronic structure, phase stability, and transport properties of the AlTiVCr lightweight high- entropy alloy: A computational study, arXiv:2601.16528 (2026)

    2026

  60. [68]

    W. L. Bragg and E. J. Williams, The effect of thermal agitation on atomic arrangement in alloys, Proc. R. Soc. A145, 699 (1934)

    1934

  61. [69]

    W. L. Bragg and E. J. Williams, The effect of thermal agitaion on atomic arrangement in alloys-II, Proc. R. Soc. A151, 540 (1935)

    1935

  62. [70]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of State Calcula- tions by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys.21, 1087 (1953)

    1953

  63. [71]

    D. P. Landau and K. Binder,A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Wang and D

    F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Efficient, Multiple-Range Random Walk Algorithm to Calculate the Density of States, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2050 (2001)

  65. [73]

    Wang and D

    F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Determining the density of states for classical statistical models: A random walk algorithm to produce a flat histogram, Phys. Rev. E64, 056101 (2001)

    2001

  66. [74]

    Kawasaki, Diffusion Constants near the Critical Point for Time-Dependent Ising Models

    K. Kawasaki, Diffusion Constants near the Critical Point for Time-Dependent Ising Models. I, Phys. Rev. 145, 224 (1966)

    1966

  67. [75]

    H. J. Naguszewski, L. B. P´ artay, D. Quigley, and C. D. Woodgate, BraWl: Simulating the thermodynamics and phase stability of multicomponent alloys using con- ventional and enhanced sampling techniques, J. Open Source Softw.10, 8346 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    H. J. Naguszewski, C. D. Woodgate, and D. Quigley, Optimal parallelisation strategies for flat histogram Monte Carlo sampling, Comput. Phys. Commun.324, 110125 (2026)

    2026

  69. [77]

    J. M. Cowley, Short- and Long-Range Order Parame- ters in Disordered Solid Solutions, Phys. Rev.120, 1648 (1960)

    1960

  70. [78]

    M. E. Straumanis and L. S. Yu, Lattice parameters, den- sities, expansion coefficients and perfection of structure of Cu and of Cu–Inαphase, Acta Crystallogr. A25, 676 (1969)

    1969

  71. [79]

    Mishima, S

    Y. Mishima, S. Ochiai, and T. Suzuki, Lattice parame- ters of Ni (γ), Ni 3Al (γ ′) and Ni3Ga (γ ′) solid solutions with additions of transition and B-subgroup elements, Acta Metall.33, 1161 (1985)

    1985

  72. [80]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  73. [81]

    Grabowski, T

    B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, and J. Neugebauer,Ab initio study of the thermodynamic properties of nonmagnetic elementary fcc metals: Exchange-correlation-related er- ror bars and chemical trends, Phys. Rev. B76, 024309 (2007)

    2007

  74. [82]

    P. Haas, F. Tran, and P. Blaha, Calculation of the lattice constant of solids with semilocal functionals, Phys. Rev. B79, 085104 (2009)

    2009

  75. [83]

    G. I. Csonka, J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, P. H. T. Philipsen, S. Leb` egue, J. Paier, O. A. Vydrov, and J. G. ´Angy´ an, Assessing the performance of recent density functionals for bulk solids, Phys. Rev. B79, 155107 (2009)

    2009

  76. [84]

    H. M. Ledbetter and E. R. Naimon, Elastic Properties of Metals and Alloys. II. Copper, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. 18 Data3, 897 (1974)

    1974

  77. [85]

    F. X. Kayser and C. Stassis, The elastic constants of Ni3Al at 0 and 23.5 ◦C, Phys. Status Solidi A64, 335 (1981)

    1981

  78. [86]

    S. V. Prikhodko, H. Yang, A. J. Ardell, J. D. Carnes, and D. G. Isaak, Temperature and composition depen- dence of the elastic constants of Ni 3Al, Metall. Mater. Trans. A30, 2403 (1999)

    1999

  79. [87]

    With increasing temperature there may be some modest rotation of these vectors in concentration space

    Note also that, wherever eigenvectors of the chemical stability matrix are quoted in the text, we provide their numerical value at the temperature at which their asso- ciated eigenvalue passes through zero. With increasing temperature there may be some modest rotation of these...

  80. [88]

    In this context, a ‘virtual’ ordering refers to a hypotheti- cal chemical ordering that takes place above the melting temperature of the material

  81. [89]

    R. W. Cahn, P. A. Siemers, J. E. Geiger, and P. Bard- han, The order-disorder transformation in Ni 3Al and Ni3AlFe alloys—I. Determination of the transition tem- peratures and their relation to ductility, Acta Metall. 35, 2737 (1987)

    1987

  82. [90]

    F. J. Bremer, M. Beyss, E. Karthaus, A. Hellwig, T. Schober, J.-M. Welter, and H. Wenzl, The or- der–disorder transition of the intermetallic phase Ni3Al, Phys. Status Solidi A110, 77 (1988)

    1988

  83. [91]

    Okamoto, Al-Ni (aluminum-nickel), J

    H. Okamoto, Al-Ni (aluminum-nickel), J. Phase Equi- libria Diffus.25, 394 (2004)

    2004

  84. [92]

    van de Walle and G

    A. van de Walle and G. Ceder, The effect of lattice vi- brations on substitutional alloy thermodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 11 (2002)

    2002

  85. [93]

    Ravelo, J

    R. Ravelo, J. Aguilar, M. Baskes, J. E. Angelo, B. Fultz, and B. L. Holian, Free energy and vibrational entropy difference between ordered and disordered Ni 3Al, Phys. Rev. B57, 862 (1998)

    1998

  86. [94]

    M. F. Michelon and A. Antonelli, Computational study of configurational and vibrational contributions to the thermodynamics of substitutional alloys: The case of Ni3Al, Phys. Rev. B81, 094204 (2010)

    2010

  87. [95]

    Zhang, V

    Y.-W. Zhang, V. Sorkin, Z. H. Aitken, A. Politano, J. Behler, A. P Thompson, T. W. Ko, S. P. Ong, O. Cha- lykh, D. Korogod, E. Podryabinkin, A. Shapeev, J. Li, Y. Mishin, Z. Pei, X. Liu, J. Kim, Y. Park, S. Hwang, S. Han, K. Sheriff, Y. Cao, and R. Freitas, Roadmap for the dev...

    2025

  88. [96]

    Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool, Model

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng.18, 015012 (2010)

    2010

  89. [97]

    See Supplemental Material atURL will be inserted by publisherfor plots of the temperature-dependent Warren-Cowley ASRO parameters obtained from our Monte Carlo simulations for all considered values ofx

  90. [98]

    E. C. Stoner, Collective electron ferronmagnetism, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A165, 372 (1938)

    1938

  91. [99]

    D. H. Seib and W. E. Spicer, Photoemission and Optical Studies of Cu-Ni Alloys. I. Cu-Rich Alloys, Phys. Rev. B2, 1676 (1970)

    1970

  92. [100]

    D. H. Seib and W. E. Spicer, Photoemission and Op- tical Studies of Cu-Ni Alloys. II. Ni-Rich and Nearly Equiatomic Alloys, Phys. Rev. B2, 1694 (1970)

    1970

  93. [101]

    Mozer, D

    B. Mozer, D. T. Keating, and S. C. Moss, Neutron Mea- surement of Clustering in the Alloy CuNi, Phys. Rev. 175, 868 (1968)

    1968

  94. [102]

    Vrijen and S

    J. Vrijen and S. Radelaar, Clustering in Cu-Ni alloys: A diffuse neutron-scattering study, Phys. Rev. B17, 409 (1978)

    1978

  95. [103]

    The data supporting the findings of this study are avail- able at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18270973

    doi

  96. [104]

    The SPR-KKR package,https://www.sprkkr.org

  97. [105]

    A. B. Alchagirov, J. P. Perdew, J. C. Boettger, R. C. Albers, and C. Fiolhais, Energy and pressure versus vol- ume: Equations of state motivated by the stabilized jel- lium model, Phys. Rev. B63, 224115 (2001)

    2001

  98. [106]

    Hjorth Larsen, J

    A. Hjorth Larsen, J. Jørgen Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Du lak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus, E. D. Hermes, P. C. Jennings, P. Bjerre Jensen, J. Kermode, J. R. Kitchin, E. Leonhard Kolsbjerg, J. Kubal, K. Kaasb- jerg, S. Lysgaard...

    2017

  99. [107]

    O. K. Andersen, Linear methods in band theory, Phys. Rev. B12, 3060 (1975)

    1975

  100. [108]

    S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Accurate spin- dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis, Can. J. Phys.58, 1200 (1980)

    1980

  101. [109]

    C. D. Woodgate and J. B. Staunton, Competition be- tween phase ordering and phase segregation in the TixNbMoTaW and Ti xVNbMoTaW refractory high- entropy alloys, J. Appl. Phys.135, 135106 (2024)

    2024

  102. [110]

    C. D. Woodgate, D. Hedlund, L. H. Lewis, and J. B. Staunton, Interplay between magnetism and short- range order in medium- and high-entropy alloys: Cr- CoNi, CrFeCoNi, and CrMnFeCoNi, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 053801 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    Ghosh, K

    S. Ghosh, K. Ueltzen, J. George, J. Neugebauer, and F. K¨ ormann, Chemical ordering and magnetism in face- centered cubic CrCoNi alloy, npj Comput. Mater.10, 284 (2024)

    2024

  104. [112]

    J. S. Kouvel and M. E. Fisher, Detailed Magnetic Be- havior of Nickel Near its Curie Point, Phys. Rev.136, A1626 (1964)

    1964

  105. [113]

    J. C. Ododo and B. R. Coles, The critical concentration for the onset of ferromagnetism in CuNi alloys, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys.7, 2393 (1977)

    1977

  106. [114]

    F. R. De Boer, C. J. Schinkel, J. Biesterbos, and S. Proost, Exchange-Enhanced Paramagnetism and Weak Ferromagnetism in the Ni3Al and Ni 3Ga Phases; Giant Moment Inducement in Fe-Doped Ni3Ga, J. Appl. Phys.40, 1049 (1969)

    1969

  107. [115]

    A. S. Hamid, A. Uedono, Z. Major, T. D. Haynes, J. Laverock, M. A. Alam, S. B. Dugdale, and D. Fort, Electronic structure and Fermi surface of the weak fer- romagnet Ni3Al, Phys. Rev. B84, 235107 (2011)

    2011

  108. [116]

    disordered local moment

    J. Staunton, B. Gy˝ orffy, A. Pindor, G. Stocks, and H. Winter, The “disordered local moment” picture of itinerant magnetism at finite temperatures, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.45, 15 (1984)

    1984

  109. [117]

    J. B. Staunton, A. Marmodoro, and A. Ernst, Using density functional theory to describe slowly varying fluc- tuations at finite temperatures: local magnetic moments 19 in Gd and the ‘not so local’ moments of Ni, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter26, 274210 (2014)

    2014

  110. [118]

    Bruno and B

    E. Bruno and B. Ginatempo, Algorithms for Korringa- Kohn-Rostoker electronic structure calculations in any Bravais lattice, Phys. Rev. B55, 12946 (1997). Formation of L12-orderedγ ′-Ni3Al precipitates in ternary Cu–Ni–Al alloys modelled using anab initioconcentration wave theo...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.