Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 70 references

Radio follow-up of 20 Einstein Probe FXTs finds two relativistic afterglows and shows the class is mixed.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 00:52 UTC pith:EQP5DPPM

load-bearing objection Solid first radio census of EP FXTs: new multi-facility data and standard equipartition numbers for two events, with the heterogeneity claim kept comparative and the usual SSA caveats already flagged. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27439 v1 pith:EQP5DPPM submitted 2026-07-29 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

Radio Follow-Up of Einstein Probe Fast X-Ray Transients

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM PACS 98.70.Rz95.85.Bh97.60.Bw
keywords fast X-ray transientsEinstein Proberadio afterglowsequipartitionrelativistic outflowsAllen Telescope Arraygamma-ray burststidal disruption events
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Fast X-ray transients are brief soft X-ray bursts whose engines are still unclear. This campaign watched 20 events found by the Einstein Probe in 2024, mainly with the Allen Telescope Array on timescales of roughly 1–65 days, plus deeper data from other arrays. Two sources produced clear radio afterglows. EP241021a peaks near 30 days at about 1 mJy and is consistent with a mildly relativistic on-axis outflow; EP240315a shows early highly relativistic emission that decelerates, matching a jetted blast. The detections and the many non-detections together span luminosities that reach the bright end of gamma-ray-burst and relativistic tidal-disruption afterglows, so the FXT population almost certainly mixes relativistic jets with slower explosions. The work supplies concrete luminosity thresholds under a gamma-ray-burst redshift prior and maps how upcoming arrays will turn these case studies into population statistics.

Core claim

Two of twenty Einstein Probe fast X-ray transients have radio counterparts whose light curves and equipartition modelling require relativistic outflows (EP241021a mildly relativistic with on-axis Lorentz factor about 1.3; EP240315a early Lorentz factor greater than or equal to 3 that decelerates), while the ATA non-detections reach luminosities overlapping the brightest GRB and relativistic TDE afterglows, showing that FXTs form a heterogeneous population of both relativistic and non-relativistic explosions.

What carries the argument

Equipartition analysis of the radio spectral/temporal peaks (Matsumoto & Piran formulae) that converts observed peak flux, frequency, time and redshift into minimum energy, radius and on-axis Lorentz factor under the assumption that the peak is synchrotron-self-absorbed near equipartition.

Load-bearing premise

The quoted energies and speeds assume each radio peak is caused by synchrotron self-absorption near equipartition with unity filling factors; if that is wrong the numbers shift even though the light curves stay the same.

What would settle it

A larger uniform radio sample of Einstein Probe FXTs that either recovers many more early highly relativistic afterglows or finds that virtually all remaining events stay radio-quiet below the luminosity of ordinary supernovae would directly test whether the class is truly mixed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • FXTs cannot be treated as a single engine; relativistic jets and slower explosions both occur.
  • Under a GRB-like distance prior, current ATA limits already rule out only the most luminous afterglows at typical redshifts and begin to constrain ordinary GRB/TDE luminosities for nearby events.
  • Rapid multi-band radio monitoring within days of an X-ray trigger is required to catch rising light curves and measure break frequencies.
  • ATA upgrades plus SKA, DSA and ngVLA will move the field from individual case studies to population-level radio demographics of FXTs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The radio-quiet majority may be dominated by supernova shock-breakout or magnetar-powered events rather than off-axis jets, a distinction that host-galaxy demographics and late-time optical spectroscopy can settle.
  • If structured jets are common, off-axis viewing angles of a few tens of degrees should produce a larger population of radio-bright, gamma-ray-faint FXTs once sub-microjansky surveys become routine.
  • Simultaneous early X-ray and radio spectral indices on future events can test whether the self-absorption assumption used for equipartition holds or whether additional electron populations are required.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper reports a coordinated radio campaign on 20 Einstein Probe fast X-ray transients from 2024, centred on 59 ATA epochs (~1–65 d post-trigger; typical 3σ limits 0.6–1.5 mJy at 1–8 GHz), plus targeted MeerKAT/VLA data for EP240315a and AMI-LA monitoring for EP241021a (and two non-detections). Two sources have radio counterparts. For EP241021a, a broken-power-law fit to the 15.5 GHz light curve peaks near 30 d at ~1 mJy; equipartition analysis yields a Newtonian E_eq ~ 3×10^49 erg and a mildly relativistic on-axis solution (Γ_on ≈ 1.3), with an allowed (β, θ) grid. For EP240315a, multi-frequency modelling (new VLA plus published MeerKAT/ATCA/eMERLIN) indicates early Γ ≳ 3 that decelerates, consistent with a jetted GRB-like outflow. ATA non-detections are mapped to observer-frame specific-luminosity thresholds under a GRB-like redshift prior and compared to GRB, TDE, SN, and LFBOT radio light curves. The authors conclude that FXTs are heterogeneous, spanning relativistic and (by implication) non-relativistic channels, and outline prospects for upgraded ATA and next-generation arrays.

Significance. This is a timely and useful first systematic radio census of the newly opened Einstein Probe FXT sample. The observational core—prompt ATA scheduling, documented reduction, tabulated 3σ limits, and well-sampled light curves for the two detections—is solid and will be a reference dataset. The equipartition and multi-frequency analyses follow standard published methods (Matsumoto & Piran 2023; broken power laws with MCMC) and are presented with explicit minima, filling-factor assumptions, and viewing-angle grids rather than over-claimed unique solutions. The population comparison under a GRB redshift prior gives concrete luminosity thresholds that future surveys can beat. Strengths include justification for discarding the anomalous ATCA 9 GHz point, public availability of limits in the appendix, and a clear forward look to SKA/DSA/ngVLA. If the heterogeneity framing is kept carefully comparative, the paper is a valuable contribution to multi-wavelength transient astronomy.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.4, Abstract, §5] §4.4 and Abstract/Conclusions: the claim that FXTs “comprise a heterogeneous population including both relativistic and non-relativistic explosions” is only partly supported by the data as presented. The two detections are consistent with relativistic (mildly to highly) outflows; the ATA non-detections under a GRB-like p(z) mainly show that afterglows as luminous as the brightest GRB/relativistic-TDE radio peaks are uncommon at the sampled epochs. Non-detections do not by themselves establish a non-relativistic subpopulation—they are also consistent with off-axis/faint relativistic jets, different redshift distributions, or peaks outside the observed window. Please rephrase the heterogeneity conclusion to separate (i) demonstrated relativistic members from (ii) the statement that bright radio counterparts are rare, and note what would be required to claim non-relativistic explosions (e.g
  2. [§3.3, §4.3, Table 4] §3.3 and §4.3 (Eqs. 2, 5–8; Table 4): the EP240315a deceleration and Γ(t) sequence rest on a single multi-frequency broken-power-law fit after discarding the ATCA 9 GHz point at ΔT=19.576 d, and on the assumption that each frequency’s fitted peak is SSA-dominated near equipartition (η=1, f_A=f_V=1). The paper already notes spectral-segment tension with Granot & Sari (2002) and late-time degeneracy between ν_b and α_4. Because Table 4’s monotonic Γ decline and the t^−0.18 deceleration index are load-bearing for the “highly relativistic early emission that decelerates” claim, please (a) show a fit including the discarded point or a quantitative sensitivity test, (b) report posterior covariances for α_4 and ν_0, and (c) state more explicitly in the text (not only in §4.1) that the tabulated Γ_on and E_on are lower limits under those assumptions and would shift if the peak is not SSA or if f
minor comments (8)
  1. [Title page] Author block and affiliations are duplicated in the compiled text (pages 1–2); clean for production.
  2. [Figure 1] Figure 1 caption and body: comparison light curves are in observer-frame flux without redshift scaling, which is appropriate, but state explicitly in the caption that EP sources without z cannot be placed in luminosity space (Figure 5 does this well).
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (1)] Eq. (1) text says “α_i are the time indices of the amplitude, rise, and fall” while the equation uses α_2 and α_3 only; align notation with Eq. (2)’s α_1…α_4.
  4. [Table 1] Table 1: “Date of discovery” column appears to mix dates and times (e.g. “2024-03-15 20:10:44”); clarify UTC trigger time vs. calendar date.
  5. [§2.1, §4.5] §2.1: “full complement of 43” vs. §4.5/Conclusions “42-antenna array”—pick one consistent number.
  6. [Appendix A] Appendix A table: dates are written as DDMMYYYY without separators (e.g. 05012024); use ISO dates for machine readability. Some early limits are much shallower (tens of mJy) than the “0.6–1.5 mJy” typical range quoted in the abstract—briefly note RFI/array-size dependence.
  7. [§1 (end)] Cosmology line: “T_CMB = 2.725,K” has a stray comma; Ω_m is written as Ω_Λ = 0.3 in one place—fix to standard H_0, Ω_m, Ω_Λ.
  8. [References] References: several GCN circulars and arXiv-only works are appropriate; ensure consistency of journal vs. arXiv formatting for in-press EP papers (Gillanders, Levan, Liu, etc.).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: observational fluxes and light-curve fits feed external equipartition formulae; results are not forced by construction.

full rationale

This is a standard multi-facility radio follow-up paper. ATA/AMI-LA/VLA/MeerKAT flux densities and 3σ limits are measured independently of any physical model. Broken-power-law parameters (peak time, peak flux, temporal/spectral indices) are fitted to those data (Eqs. 1–2, MCMC with stated priors) and then inserted into the published Matsumoto & Piran (2023) Newtonian and relativistic equipartition relations; the resulting E_eq, R_eq, β_eq,N, β_on and Γ_on are derived outputs, not targets that were fitted or defined into the inputs. The paper treats them explicitly as approximate minima under stated assumptions (η=1, f_A=f_V=1, SSA peak) and maps allowed (β,θ) grids rather than claiming uniqueness. Population statements rest on direct luminosity comparison of detections and non-detections to external GRB/TDE samples and a GRB-like p(z) prior from Pescalli et al. (2016); no quantity is renamed as a prediction of itself. Minor methodological citation of Bright et al. (2025) for the numerical β_on solve is not load-bearing uniqueness. The derivation chain is self-contained and externally falsifiable; score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central physical claims rest on standard synchrotron afterglow and equipartition machinery plus a GRB redshift prior for non-detections. No new particles or forces are invented. Free parameters are the usual light-curve fit amplitudes/indices and fixed smoothness/filling-factor choices. Domain assumptions (SSA peak, equipartition minimum, on-axis minimum-energy branch) dominate the energy/Γ inferences.

free parameters (4)
  • Broken-power-law amplitude F0, break time/frequency, and indices α_i for EP241021a and EP240315a = EP241021a: t_b=30.1±2.8 d, F_ν≈1030 μJy, α2≈0.96, α3≈-0.95; EP240315a: ν0=13±2 GHz at t_b=11.28 d, α2≈1.03, α3≈-0.38, α4
    Fitted with emcee to the radio light curves (Eqs. 1–2); peak flux and t_b/ν_b used downstream for equipartition.
  • Smoothness parameter s = s=2 (fixed)
    Fixed to 2 rather than fitted in both light-curve models.
  • Area and volume filling factors f_A, f_V and η = f_A=f_V=η=1
    Set to unity for equipartition velocity/energy (Eq. 7); authors note opposing constraints but do not fit them.
  • Normalization epoch t_b for EP240315a multi-frequency fit = t_b=11.28 days
    Fixed to the best-sampled epoch (11.28 d) rather than left free.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Synchrotron emission from a single impulsive ejecta component with power-law electrons and uniform B-field; spectral/temporal peak marks τ_νp≃1 SSA turnover near equipartition (Matsumoto & Piran 2023 formulae).
    Sections 4.1–4.3; converts observed peaks into E_eq, R_eq, β_eq, Γ_on.
  • domain assumption On-axis configuration minimizes energy for fixed Lorentz factor; off-axis solutions require higher energy and are bounded by Doppler-factor grid search.
    Used to quote Γ_on≈1.27 for EP241021a and Γ≳3 for EP240315a and θ_max bounds (Figs. 4, 6).
  • domain assumption Non-detection luminosity thresholds may be interpreted by sampling redshifts from the Pescalli et al. (2016) GRB rate prior tracking cosmic star formation, omitting K-correction (flat spectrum).
    Section 4.4; produces L_ν ~ 10^31–10^33 erg s^-1 Hz^-1 observer-frame limits.
  • standard math Flat ΛCDM cosmology with H0=70 km s^-1 Mpc^-1, Ω_Λ=0.3.
    Stated in Introduction; used for all luminosity distances.
  • ad hoc to paper Discarded ATCA 9 GHz point at ΔT=19.576 d is spurious based on implied T_B and spectral-index jump.
    Section 3.3; affects EP240315a multi-frequency fit if the point were retained.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 32742 in / 3765 out tokens · 73814 ms · 2026-07-31T00:52:45.119010+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fast X-ray transients (FXTs) are brief, luminous bursts of soft X-ray emission whose physical origins remain uncertain. The Einstein Probe (EP) mission has recently enabled prompt discovery of these events, providing opportunities for rapid multi-wavelength follow-up. We present a coordinated radio observing campaign targeting 20 FXTs detected by the EP in 2024. The core consists of 59 epochs with the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), sampling post-burst timescales from $\sim$1 to $\sim$65 days and reaching typical $3\sigma$ sensitivities of 0.6--1.5\,mJy across 1--8\,GHz. Two FXTs---EP240315a and EP241021a---have radio counterparts. For EP241021a, AMI-LA monitoring at 15.5\,GHz reveals a light curve peaking at $\sim$30 days with $F_{\nu}\approx1.0$\,mJy; equipartition analysis implies a Newtonian equipartition energy of $\sim3\times10^{49}$\,erg and a mildly relativistic on-axis solution with $\Gamma_{\rm on}\approx1.3$. Multi-frequency modelling of EP240315a, combining new VLA measurements with published MeerKAT, ATCA, and eMERLIN data, indicates highly relativistic early emission ($\Gamma\gtrsim3$) that decelerates with time, consistent with jetted outflow. The detections and ATA non-detections span luminosities overlapping the brightest GRB and relativistic tidal disruption event (TDE) afterglows, suggesting FXTs comprise a heterogeneous population including both relativistic and non-relativistic explosions. Under a GRB-like redshift prior, our $3\sigma$ ATA limits correspond to observer-frame specific-luminosity thresholds of $\sim10^{32}$--$10^{33}\,\mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$; for nearby events ($z\lesssim0.2$), $L_{\nu}\lesssim10^{30\text{--}31}\,\mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$. Planned ATA upgrades and next-generation arrays (SKA, DSA, ngVLA) will enable sensitive, population-level radio studies of the FXT radio sky.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27439 by Alex Pollak, Andrew Siemion, Carmen Choza, Francesco Carotenuto, Joe S. Bright, Rob Fender.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The population of 3𝜎 upper limits derived from our ATA observations (filled black triangles, with downward arrows for visibility), plotted against radio light curves of extragalactic transient classes in flux density: supernovae, relativistic supernovae, LFBOTs, thermal TDEs, relativistic TDEs, and short, long, and low-luminosity GRBs. AMI-LA upper limits for two sources are shown as hollow triangles (see … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A time-evolving broken power law fit to all detections across the AMI-LA monitoring campaign of EP241021a. The indices for the best-fit rise and decline phases are 𝛼2 = 0.96 ± 0.10 and 𝛼3 = −0.95 ± 0.15 re￾spectively, peaking at ∼ 30 days with 𝐹𝑝 ∼ 1030.0 μJy at a central frequency of 15.5 GHz. We include a transparent overlay of model realizations of 200 random samples from the MCMC posterior chains. 3.3 … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relativistic jet parameter space for the Doppler factor 𝛿𝐷 = 2.056 inferred for EP241021a. The solid black curve marks the boundary in (𝛽, 𝜃 ) space that satisfies the Doppler-factor relation 𝛿𝐷 = [Γ(1−𝛽 cos 𝜃 ) ]−1 for a given intrinsic velocity 𝛽 = 𝑣/𝑐 and viewing angle 𝜃. Combinations of 𝛽 and 𝜃 above this curve (green region) can reproduce the required Doppler factor, while combinations below it (red r… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rest-frame radio light curves of Einstein Probe fast X-ray transients compared with representative classes of extragalactic transients. Solid markers and lines show the radio luminosity evolution of the three EP FXTs with detected counterparts or luminosity limits and known redshifts in our sample: EP240315a (blue circles), EP241021a (green circles for detections, green triangles for 3𝜎 upper limits), and … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relativistic jet parameter space for the Doppler factor 𝛿𝐷 = 5.531 inferred for EP240315a at 3.0 GHz. The solid black curve marks the boundary in (𝛽, 𝜃 ) space that satisfies the Doppler-factor relation 𝛿𝐷 = [Γ(1 − 𝛽 cos 𝜃 ) ]−1 for a given intrinsic velocity 𝛽 = 𝑣/𝑐 and view￾ing angle 𝜃. Combinations of 𝛽 and 𝜃 above this curve (green region) can reproduce the required Doppler factor, while combinations b… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ATA limits mapped into the rest-frame (𝑡rest, 𝐿𝜈 ) plane under a GRB-like redshift prior. We sample redshifts from the observed GRB distribution of Pescalli et al. (2016) and show only the earliest, median-sensitivity, and deepest ATA limits for clarity. Crosshairs mark the median over the redshift prior with 16–84% ranges in both axes. Dotted curves trace each limit through the plane as a function of assu… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Detection fraction versus intrinsic specific luminosity 𝐿𝜈 under the GRB redshift prior of Pescalli et al. (2016). Curves are shown for the earliest, median sensitivity, and deepest ATA limits (as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Rest-frame 90% detection-probability limits derived from the earliest ATA limit at 2660 MHz for each source. Open symbols each correspond to one source, showing the characteristic rest-frame time since explosion (𝑡rest) and the luminosity threshold 𝐿90 above which 90% of Monte Carlo–sampled GRB redshifts would yield a detectable signal given the measured flux-density limit. The limits are computed using th… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the ATA sensitivity with current and next-generation radio facilities. Curves show the limiting isotropic peak radio luminosity as a function of redshift for representative 1000 s integrations at the indicated observing frequencies. The ATA sensitivity curve (black dotted) reflects the performance during the early half of this survey (21 antennas, dual-tuning configuration). The DSA, SKA-LOW… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yuan, Weimin and Zhang, Chen and Chen, Yong and Ling, Zhixing , year = 2022, pages =. The. Handbook of

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , urldate =

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , urldate =

  3. [3]

    , author =

    The Low-Frequency Structure of Powerful Radio Sources and Limits to Departures from Equipartition. , author =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/180.4.539 , urldate =

  4. [4]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Extragalactic fast. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243047 , abstract =

  5. [5]

    , title =

    Author, A. , title =. Sample Journal , year =

  6. [6]

    and others , publisher =

    Heywood, I. and others , publisher =. The 1.28 GHz MeerKAT Galactic Center Mosaic , url =. 2022 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac449a , journal =

  7. [7]

    1984 , journaltitle =

    Large, Highly Organized Radio Structures near the Galactic Centre , author =. 1984 , journaltitle =. doi:10.1038/310557a0 , url =

  8. [8]

    Sparsity Averaging Reweighted Analysis (SARA): A novel algorithm for radio-interferometric imaging , volume =

    Carrillo, Rafael and McEwen, Jason and Wiaux, Yves , year =. Sparsity Averaging Reweighted Analysis (SARA): A novel algorithm for radio-interferometric imaging , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , doi =

  9. [9]

    , year = 1974, month = jun, volume =

    Aperture Synthesis with a Non-Regular Distribution of Interferometer Baselines. , year = 1974, month = jun, volume =

  10. [10]

    (Quirola-Vasquez+, 2023)

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Extragalactic fast X-ray transient cand. (Quirola-Vasquez+, 2023)

  11. [11]

    and Glennie, A

    Jonker, P. and Glennie, A. and Heida, Marianne and Maccarone, T. and Hodgkin, S. and Nelemans, G. and Miller-Jones, James and Torres, M. and Fender, R. , year =. Discovery of a new kind of explosive X-ray transient near M86 , volume =. The Astrophysical Journal , doi =

  12. [12]

    Soderberg, A. M. and Berger, E. and Page, K. L. and Schady, P. and Parrent, J. and Pooley, D. and Wang, X.-Y. and Ofek, E. O. and Cucchiara, A. and Rau, A. and Waxman, E. and Simon, J. D. and Bock, D. C.-J. and Milne, P. A. and Page, M. J. and Barentine, J. C. and Barthelmy, S. D. and Beardmore, A. P. and Bietenholz, M. F. and Brown, P. and Burrows, A. an...

  13. [13]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = oct, volume =

    EP241021a: No Detection in Fermi-GBM Observation. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = oct, volume =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Two fast X-ray transients in archival Chandra data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv801 , archivePrefix =. 1504.03720 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Generalized Equipartition Method from an Arbitrary Viewing Angle , author =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1269 , urldate =

  16. [16]

    and Carotenuto, Francesco and Fender, Rob and Choza, Carmen and Mummery, Andrew and Jonker, Peter G

    Bright, Joe S. and Carotenuto, Francesco and Fender, Rob and Choza, Carmen and Mummery, Andrew and Jonker, Peter G. and Smartt, Stephen J. and DeBoer, David R. and Farah, Wael and Matthews, James and Pollak, Alexander W. and Rhodes, Lauren and Siemion, Andrew , year = 2025, month = feb, journal =. The. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaaef , urldate =

  17. [18]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI , year = 2007, editor =

    CASA Architecture and Applications. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI , year = 2007, editor =

  18. [19]

    Hugo, B. V. and Perkins, S. and Merry, B. and Mauch, T. and Smirnov, O. M. , title =. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , year =

  19. [20]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Constraints on. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9397 , abstract =

  20. [21]

    Gillanders, J. H. and Rhodes, L. and Srivastav, S. and Carotenuto, F. and Bright, J. and Huber, M. E. and Stevance, H. F. and Smartt, S. J. and Chambers, K. C. and Chen, T.-W. and Fender, R. and Andersson, A. and Cooper, A. J. and Jonker, P. G. and Cowie, F. J. and. Discovery of the. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad55...

  21. [22]

    and Sun, H

    Liu, Y. and Sun, H. and Xu, D. and Svinkin, D. S. and Delaunay, J. and Tanvir, N. R. and Gao, H. and Zhang, C. and Chen, Y. and Wu, X.-F. and Zhang, B. and Yuan, W. and An, J. and Bruni, G. and Frederiks, D. D. and Ghirlanda, G. and Hu, J.-W. and Li, A. and Li, C.-K. and Li, J.-D. and Malesani, D. B. and Piro, L. and Raman, G. and Ricci, R. and Troja, E. ...

  22. [23]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = mar, volume =

    X-ray transient EP240315a: MeerKAT radio detection. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = mar, volume =

  23. [24]

    , keywords =

    The Shape of Spectral Breaks in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/338966 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0108027 , primaryClass =

  24. [25]

    oxkat: Semi-automated imaging of MeerKAT observations

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    Fast X-Ray Transients and Their Connection to Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/367761 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0304347 , primaryClass =

  26. [27]

    Handbook of Supernovae , year = 2017, editor =

    Shock Breakout Theory. Handbook of Supernovae , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_33 , adsurl =

  27. [28]

    The MeerKAT Galaxy Cluster Legacy Survey. I. Survey Overview and Highlights. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141488 , archivePrefix =. 2111.05673 , primaryClass =

  28. [29]

    , keywords =

    The variability time-scales and brightness temperatures of radio flares from stars to supermassive black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2335 , archivePrefix =. 1411.1067 , primaryClass =

  29. [30]

    , keywords =

    Blasts from the Past: Supernova Shock Breakouts among X-Ray Transients in the XMM-Newton Archive. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba , archivePrefix =. 2004.09519 , primaryClass =

  30. [31]

    , keywords =

    A Supernova Candidate at z = 0.092 in XMM-Newton Archival Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab98f8 , archivePrefix =. 2004.10665 , primaryClass =

  31. [32]

    , keywords =

    A new, faint population of X-ray transients. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx417 , archivePrefix =. 1702.04422 , primaryClass =

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    A magnetar-powered X-ray transient as the aftermath of a binary neutron-star merger. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1079-5 , archivePrefix =. 1904.05368 , primaryClass =

  33. [34]

    , keywords =

    Probing for the host galaxies of the fast X-ray transients XRT 000519 and XRT 110103. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1194 , archivePrefix =. 2204.10012 , primaryClass =

  34. [35]

    , keywords =

    WSCLEAN: an implementation of a fast, generic wide-field imager for radio astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1368 , archivePrefix =. 1407.1943 , primaryClass =

  35. [36]

    Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2019, volume =

    The Science Ready Data Products Revolution at the NRAO. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2019, volume =

  36. [37]

    , keywords =

    A digital correlator upgrade for the Arcminute MicroKelvin Imager. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty074 , archivePrefix =. 1707.04237 , primaryClass =

  37. [38]

    , keywords =

    The Arcminute Microkelvin Imager. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13953.x , archivePrefix =. 0807.2469 , primaryClass =

  38. [39]

    , keywords =

    The rate and luminosity function of long gamma ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526760 , archivePrefix =. 1506.05463 , primaryClass =

  39. [40]

    and Jonker, Peter G

    Levan, Andrew J. and Jonker, Peter G. and Saccardi, Andrea and Malesani, Daniele Bj. Fast. Nature Astronomy , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02612-9 , abstract =

  40. [41]

    , keywords =

    Identification of the Optical Counterpart of the Fast X-Ray Transient EP240414a. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9c75 , archivePrefix =. 2409.19070 , primaryClass =

  41. [42]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =

    EP240801a: GTC spectroscopy and absorption redshift. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =

  42. [43]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =

    EP240806a: Gemini North-GMOS spectroscopic redshift of z = 2.818. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =

  43. [44]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = oct, volume =

    EP241021a: VLT/FORS2 redshift z = 0.75. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = oct, volume =

  44. [45]

    , keywords =

    The Koala: A Fast Blue Optical Transient with Luminous Radio Emission from a Starburst Dwarf Galaxy at z = 0.27. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bcf , archivePrefix =. 2003.01222 , primaryClass =

  45. [46]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = nov, volume =

    EP241021a: Upper limit from Konus-Wind observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2024, month = nov, volume =

  46. [47]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    The curious case of. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554626 , abstract =

  47. [48]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume =

    Shu, Xinwen and Yang, Lei and Yang, Haonan and Xu, Fan and Chen, Jin-Hong and. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf4cd , urldate =

  48. [49]

    Granot, Jonathan and Panaitescu, Alin and Kumar, Pawan and Woosley, Stan E. , doi =. Off-Axis Afterglow Emission from Jetted Gamma-Ray Bursts , url =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =. 2002 , bdsk-url-1 =

  49. [50]

    Beniamini, Paz and Piran, Tsvi and Matsumoto, Tatsuya , year = 2023, month = jun, journal =. Swift. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1950 , abstract =. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/524/1/1386/50854881/stad1950.pdf , pages =

  50. [51]

    , year = 2002, month = jun, journal =

    Rossi, Elena and Lazzati, Davide and Rees, Martin J. , year = 2002, month = jun, journal =. Afterglow Light Curves, Viewing Angle and the Jet Structure of. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05363.x , urldate =

  51. [52]

    and O'Connor, Brendan and Kang, Yacheng and Becerra, Rosa L

    Yadav, Muskan and Troja, Eleonora and Ricci, Roberto and Yang, Yu-Han and Wieringa, Mark H. and O'Connor, Brendan and Kang, Yacheng and Becerra, Rosa L. and Ryan, Geoffrey and Busmann, Malte , year = 2025, month = dec, journal =. Radio. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1746 , urldate =

  52. [53]

    Hu, J. W. and Wang, Y. and He, H. and Yang, S. K. and Cheng, Y. H. and Yuan, W. M. and. GRB Coordinates Network , volume =

  53. [54]

    and Frederiks, D

    Svinkin, D. and Frederiks, D. and Lysenko, A. and Ridnaia, A. and Tsvetkova, A. and Ulanov, M. and Cline, T. and. Konus-. GRB Coordinates Network , volume =

  54. [55]

    and Hall, Xander J

    O'Connor, Brendan and Beniamini, Paz and Troja, Eleonora and Busmann, Malte and Dichiara, Simone and Gill, Ramandeep and Granot, Jonathan and Moss, Michael J. and Hall, Xander J. and Palmese, Antonella and Passaleva, Niccol. The. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae146b , urldate =

  55. [56]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Synchrotron self-absorption and the minimum energy of optically thick radio flares from stellar mass black holes , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2000 , abstract =

  56. [57]

    Physics Reports , volume =

    Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Fireball Model , author =. Physics Reports , volume =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00127-6 , urldate =

  57. [58]

    Science , author =

    Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neutron star merger , volume =. Science , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.aau8815 , abstract =

  58. [59]

    Beniamini, Paz and Gill, Ramandeep and Granot, Jonathan , year = 2022, month = jul, journal =. Robust. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1821 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2204.06008 , primaryclass =

  59. [60]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    A. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2012 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/156 , abstract =

  60. [61]

    SARAO , year = 2025, urldate =

  61. [62]

    Ngvla Ect , author =

  62. [63]

    CSIRO , year = 2025, month = aug, publisher =

  63. [64]

    DSA , year = 2025, journal =

  64. [65]

    NRAO , year = 2025, urldate =

  65. [66]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905116 , urldate =

    Distance Measures in Cosmology , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905116 , urldate =. arXiv , langid =:astro-ph/9905116 , publisher =

  66. [67]

    Anderson, G. E. and Staley, T. D. and. The. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2407 , urldate =

  67. [68]

    Long-Term

    Ricci, Roberto and Troja, Eleonora and Yang, Yu-Han and Yadav, Muskan and Liu, Yuan and Sun, Hui and Wu, Xuefeng and Gao, He and Zhang, Bing and Yuan, Weimin , year = 2025, month = jan, journal =. Long-Term. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8b3f , urldate =

  68. [69]

    The Soft

    Gianfagna, Giulia and Piro, Luigi and Bruni, Gabriele and Linesh Thakur, Aishwarya and Van Eerten, Hendrik and. The Soft. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.05444 , urldate =

  69. [70]

    and Berger, E

    Cendes, Y. and Berger, E. and Alexander, K. D. and Chornock, R. and Margutti, R. and Metzger, B. and Wieringa, M. H. and Bietenholz, M. F. and Hajela, A. and Laskar, T. and Stroh, M. C. and Terreran, G. , year = 2024, month = aug, journal =. Ubiquitous. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541 , urldate =

  70. [71]

    Bietenholz, M. F. and Bartel, N. and Argo, M. and Dua, R. and Ryder, S. and Soderberg, A. , year = 2021, month = feb, journal =. The. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abccd9 , urldate =