REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 89 references
Information-driven stepping in dimeric transport motors
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A dimeric transport motor can step as a pure information engine, with position-gated mobility switching alone producing directed motion and the observed stall force.
desk verdict New switching-mobility model for dimeric motors with testable dwell-time predictions, but the load-bearing derivations sit in an inaccessible Supplementary Material. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is a pair of overdamped Langevin equations for the head coordinates x0, x1, controlled by a two-state chemical variable ν that sets each head's mobility to zero or the diffusion constant D. Switching rates k(r) = Γ(r) exp(±βΔμ h(r)/2) depend on the relative displacement r = x0 - x1 and satisfy local detailed balance. Homodimer symmetry (identical heads, rates invariant under exchanging them) forces the steady-state energy flow between heads to vanish. For analytical results the switching is localized at r = ±a, so the entire steady state collapses to two effective rates k± for forward/backward switches; the mean velocity is then expressed through diffusive first-passa
What would settle it
Measure the mechanical work done on a motor head during a single chemical transition (e.g., by high-resolution optical trapping with fast force feedback synchronized to ATP binding). If the chemical step injects a nonzero average energy into the mechanical coordinate—beyond the energy of the diffusive search—the zero-energy-exchange core of the model is falsified. Alternatively, measure dwell times conditioned on the previous binding site: if the four predicted distributions collapse to two, the second-order Markov structure is absent.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that directed motion of a dimeric transport motor can arise solely from position-gated mobility switching. At any instant exactly one head is mobile; the other is fixed to the filament. The mobile head diffuses in the symmetric linker potential plus a constant load, and when it reaches a target displacement the chemical state flips, swapping which head moves. The flipping rates obey local detailed balance with an odd, saturating function of the head separation, so forward flips are favored whenever the moving head is ahead. Because the chemical switch does not alter the potential, the average energy flow between chemical and mechanical degrees of freedom is zero at stead
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that a chemical switch changes only which head is mobile, never the mechanical energy landscape; if real ATP-driven transitions do conformational work on the heads or alter the linker potential, the 'pure information engine' characterization fails, even if the velocity and stall-force formulas remain approximate.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the model is right, kinesin- and myosin-family motors need not use conformational free-energy changes to bias stepping; position-dependent gating of head mobility alone can produce directed motion.
- The stall force f_s = Δμ/(2a) and the linear efficiency η = f/f_s follow from tight coupling, matching the experimentally observed linear force-velocity relation near stall.
- The velocity formula predicts saturation at V_max = a/τ_diff, set by the mechanics of diffusing between binding sites, so chemical driving beyond a point cannot speed the motor.
- Coarse-grained motor stepping is second-order Markovian: four dwell-time distributions (forward/backward from two initial chemical states) should be visible in single-molecule trajectories.
- The subsystem efficiencies η_chem and η_mech frame the motor's performance as information transduction, so experiments measuring work and heat flows can test the information-engine interpretation.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: if the pure-information picture holds, a practical design principle for synthetic nanomotors would be to engineer position-sensing gates rather than strained conformational transitions, and ATP consumption would primarily pay for the gating decision.
- Editorial inference: the four dwell-time distributions provide a sharp discriminator: re-analyzing existing single-molecule trajectory data conditioned on the previous binding site could test the model without new experiments, since standard kinetic analyses that report only two distributions would miss the second-order memory.
- Editorial inference: for heterodimeric or inchworm motors, the zero-energy-exchange premise breaks, so the model predicts deviations from f_s = Δμ/(2a); measuring stall forces across motor families could map where information transduction dominates and where it does not.
- Editorial inference: the mechanism offers an autonomous realization of the feedback used in non-autonomous information engines, so the formalism may extend to other processive molecular machines that step along a track.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper introduces a stochastic model of a dimeric transport motor in which two Brownian heads are alternately mobile, with a discrete chemical variable ν controlling which head moves. The switching rates are position-dependent, obey local detailed balance with an odd bias h(x0-x1), and consume chemical free energy Δμ, yet the mechanical energy landscape is unchanged upon switching. The authors change variables to relative displacement r and motor position R, derive the steady-state reduced Fokker-Planck equation for r, and use it to obtain the mean motor velocity, thermodynamic flows, and information-theoretic efficiencies. For localized switching at r=±a, they present an analytic velocity formula, stall force f_s=Δμ/(2a), and simplified thermodynamic expressions. They further coarse-grain the model to a second-order Markov dynamics and compute four dwell-time distributions. The central claim is that the motor acts as a pure information engine, with directed stepping generated by position-gated mobility switching alone.
Significance. The paper is conceptually valuable: it demonstrates that directed dimeric-motor stepping can arise from a minimal mobility-switching mechanism without any change in the mechanical potential, and the analytic formulas, if correct, provide a transparent connection between local detailed balance, first-passage times, and experimentally measurable dwell-time statistics. The stall-force result f_s=Δμ/(2a) and the prediction of four distinct dwell-time distributions are concrete, falsifiable signatures that distinguish the model from standard first-order chemical-kinetic descriptions. The assumptions (homodimer symmetry, localized switching, no landscape change) are stated explicitly, and the use of local detailed balance and stochastic-thermodynamics bookkeeping is a strength. However, the quantitative core—especially the mean-velocity formula (43)—is deferred to unavailable supplementary material, and there are apparent inconsistencies in the thermodynamic-flow definitions that need resolution.
major comments (3)
- [III A, Eq. (43); SM II and III] The paper's quantitative core is deferred to Supplementary Material that is not included in the reviewed text. Equation (43) for the mean velocity is the basis for the claims that the model reproduces experimentally observed velocity-force behavior and for the stall force (48), but the derivation is not given in the main text. Similarly, the equivalence of Eqs. (12b) and (14) is stated to be shown in SM II, and the dwell-time distributions in Sec. III D are stated to follow from SM III. Without these derivations a reader cannot verify whether Eq. (43) follows exactly from the Fokker-Planck system (10) with localized rates (37), or whether additional approximations (e.g., renewal assumptions separating diffusive search from boundary residence) are introduced. Please include the full supplementary derivations in the review version or reproduce them in the main text.
- [III B, Eqs. (22)-(24), (52)-(53)] There appears to be a factor-of-two inconsistency in the thermodynamic flows. From Eqs. (41)-(42), V = a(k_+ - k_-). Substituting the localized rates (37) into Eq. (22) gives W_chem = Δμ∫h(r)k(r)P∞(0,r) dr = Δμ(k_+ - k_-) = Δμ V/a, whereas Eq. (52) states W_chem = Δμ V/(2a). Similarly, Eq. (23) with the localized rates gives W_mech = -2f a(k_+ - k_-) = -2f V, whereas Eq. (24) states W_mech = -fV. These two pairs of equations cannot both be correct under the same definitions. If the flows in Eqs. (52)-(53) are defined per motor head rather than for the full dimer, that must be stated explicitly and carried through the first-law balance; if they are total flows, the factor of two changes the entropy-production rates in Eqs. (55)-(57). As written, the main-text bookkeeping is internally inconsistent.
- [II C, Eqs. (18)-(19); Abstract] The claim that the motor operates as a 'pure information engine' is enforced by construction rather than derived as an emergent property. The switches do not alter the mechanical energy landscape, and the homodimer symmetry forces Ė(0)=Ė(1)=0 in Eq. (19). Thus the absence of average energy exchange between heads is a direct consequence of the model assumptions, not a generic finding about dimeric motors. The abstract and discussion present this as a general mechanism ('our findings highlight how information transduction... may underlie the remarkable performance'), which overstates the scope. I recommend adding an explicit caveat that the pure-information characterization holds only within the stated assumptions and would break if real ATP-driven conformational changes modify the potential energy landscape. This does not invalidate the model, but it is important for correct interpretatio
minor comments (4)
- [Data Availability, Ref. [89]] The data-availability statement says the code is 'openly available' but Ref. [89] gives no URL, repository name, or version. The numerical figures (Figs. 3-5, 7) cannot be independently reproduced from the information provided. Please provide the actual repository link and a version identifier.
- [III D, Eq. (68)] The text says the dwell-time distributions are obtained by solving a system with 'sinks,' but Eq. (68) contains source terms coupling the two chemical states at r=±a. Clarify the terminology: the sink at the leaving boundary is implemented through the absorbing condition, while the coupling terms are sources for the complementary state.
- [III D, Eq. (75)] The sentence 'since two successive head transitions are involved in a full motor step' should be unpacked. As written it is not immediately clear why the flux ratio (75) equals e^{2βΔF} rather than e^{βΔF}; a short derivation or a precise definition of 'full motor step' in this context would help.
- [Throughout] There are several wording/grammar issues, e.g., 'η_TD of 0.4−0.6 have been reported' should be 'values of η_TD... have been reported'; 'sigma' appears instead of σ in the paragraph after Eq. (70); and the notation D∂²_{rR}P in Eqs. (8) is nonstandard and should be defined as ∂_r∂_R.
Circularity Check
Headline pure-information-engine and tight-coupling stall-force claims are partly guaranteed by construction; velocity and dwell-time derivations remain independent.
-
self definitional
[Sec. II C, paragraph following Eq. (18a); Discussion, Sec. IV]
"By construction, in our model the switches do not alter the system’s energy landscape, but rather restrict how the motor explores the landscape... it is the absence, or subdominant role, of internal energy flows that characterizes our model as an information engine."
The defining feature of the model is that chemical transitions do not change the potential; 'pure information engine' is defined as the absence of energy flow between chemical and mechanical subsystems. The paper later restates this as a conclusion ('Thermodynamically, our model behaves as a pure information engine'), so the headline characterization is an input assumption rather than a derived result. The homodimer-symmetry argument Ė(0)=0 only removes head–head energy exchange, while the zero chemical–mechanical energy exchange is the stated construction.
-
other
[Sec. III A, Eqs. (43), (44), and (48)]
"for total free energy per forward switch ΔF ≡ Δμ−2fa ... The mean velocity vanishes (V=0) at the stall force fs = Δμ/(2a), for which ΔF=0."
The velocity expression (43) contains the driving only through the factor (e^{βΔF}−1). Setting V=0 is therefore algebraically equivalent to ΔF=0, and with Eq. (44) this immediately gives f_s=Δμ/(2a). The model was built so each forward switch consumes Δμ and moves a head by 2a against force f, so the tight-coupling stall force amounts to restating the input relation rather than making an independent prediction.
full rationale
The quantitative core—Eq. (43) and the four dwell-time distributions—is a genuine derivation from the localized-switching Fokker–Planck system, with no fitted parameters; the near-linear velocity-force relation is compared to experiment only qualitatively. The main circularity is confined to the framing: the 'pure information engine' label and the tight-coupling stall force are encoded in the model's construction (no switching potential change; one switch equals one 2a step costing Δμ). This is partial, not total, because the velocity saturation, timescale-separation limits, and non-Markovian dwell-time structure are nontrivial consequences not contained in those definitions. The missing Supplementary Material is a verifiability gap, not a circularity; self-citations (e.g., Refs. [8,60,62]) are not load-bearing for the derivation.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- Δμ (chemical free energy per switch)
- k0 (bare switching rate) =
τ_r^{-1} in figures
- a (binding-site half-length) =
σ_eq in figures
- κ (linker stiffness)
- h(r) (odd switching-bias function)
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption Overdamped Langevin dynamics with Einstein relation and Gaussian white noise (Eqs. 1-2).
- domain assumption Local detailed balance for switching rates, log(k01/k10)=βΔμ h(r) (Eq. 6), with no potential-energy change on switch.
- ad hoc to paper Homodimer symmetry: k01(x0,x1)=k10(x1,x0) and V(r) even in r.
- domain assumption Switching rates depend only on the relative displacement r=x0−x1.
- ad hoc to paper Localized switching: Γ(r)=k0[δ(r−a)+δ(r+a)] (Eq. 36).
- domain assumption The total potential V(r)+f r is confining so that a steady-state relative-displacement distribution exists.
invented entities (1)
-
Implicit Maxwell demon (position-gated chemical state ν)
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Information-driven stepping in dimeric transport motors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TTI6W6I7
@misc{pith2026260727495,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Information-driven stepping in dimeric transport motors},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TTI6W6I7}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27495}
}
read the original abstract
Dimeric transport motors are nanoscale protein complexes that move along cytoskeletal filaments. Here we introduce a theoretical model for their stepping dynamics, in which the two motor heads undergo Brownian motion with mobilities periodically switching in a position-dependent manner so that only one head moves at a time. Through consumption of chemical free energy, this mechanism produces directed motion. We characterize at steady state the motor's mean velocity and its energy and information flows. The motor operates as a pure information engine, where only information is transduced between its components, without energy exchange. For localized switching, the model yields a thermodynamically consistent expression for the mean motor velocity that reproduces experimentally observed behavior, and captures the stall force characteristic of tightly coupled motors. Finally, coarse-graining the model to a single mechanical degree of freedom produces a second-order non-Markovian dynamics, from which we compute the four distinct dwell-time distributions that can be directly observed in single-molecule experiments. Our findings highlight how information transduction, via implicit operation as a Maxwell demon, may underlie the remarkable performance of these molecular motors.
Figures
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A. I. Brown and D. A. Sivak, Theory of nonequilibrium free energy transduction by molecular machines, Chem. Rev.120, 434 (2019)
2019
-
[2]
D. J. Vinyard, G. M. Ananyev, and G. C. Dismukes, Photosys- tem II: the reaction center of oxygenic photosynthesis, Annu. Rev. Biochem.82, 577 (2013)
2013
-
[3]
Alberts, The cell as a collection of protein machines: prepar- ing the next generation of molecular biologists, Cell92, 291 (1998)
B. Alberts, The cell as a collection of protein machines: prepar- ing the next generation of molecular biologists, Cell92, 291 (1998)
1998
-
[4]
E. M. Purcell, Life at low Reynolds number, inPhysics and our world: reissue of the proceedings of a symposium in honor of Victor F Weisskopf(World Scientific, 2014) pp. 47–67
2014
-
[5]
Bustamante, D
C. Bustamante, D. Keller, and G. Oster, The physics of molec- ular motors, Acc. Chem. Res.34, 412 (2001)
2001
-
[6]
A. I. Brown and D. A. Sivak, Toward the design principles of molecular machines, Physics in Canada73, 61 (2017)
2017
-
[7]
J. H. Marden and L. R. Allen, Molecules, muscles, and ma- chines: universal performance characteristics of motors, PNAS 99, 4161 (2002)
2002
-
[8]
M. P. Leighton and D. A. Sivak, Flow of energy and informa- tion in molecular machines, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.76, 379 (2025)
2025
Show all 89 references
-
[9]
K. Ito, M. Ikebe, T. Kashiyama, T. Mogami, T. Kon, and K. Ya- mamoto, Kinetic mechanism of the fastest motor protein, Chara myosin, J. Biol. Chem.282, 19534 (2007)
2007
-
[10]
H. C. Berg, The rotary motor of bacterial flagella, Annu. Rev. Biochem.72, 19 (2003)
2003
-
[11]
Schliwa and G
M. Schliwa and G. Woehlke, Molecular motors, Nature422, 759 (2003)
2003
-
[12]
A. B. Kolomeisky and M. E. Fischer, Molecular motors: A the- orist’s perspective, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.58, 675 (2007)
2007
-
[13]
S. M. Block, Kinesin motor mechanics: binding, stepping, tracking, gating, and limping, Biophys. J.92, 2986 (2007)
2007
-
[14]
J. A. Spudich, The myosin swinging cross-bridge model, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.2, 387 (2001)
2001
-
[15]
Bhabha, G
G. Bhabha, G. T. Johnson, C. M. Schroeder, and R. D. Vale, How dynein moves along microtubules, Trends Biochem. Sci 41, 94 (2016)
2016
-
[16]
D. D. Hackney, The kinetic cycles of myosin, kinesin, and dynein, Annu. Rev. Physiol.58, 731 (1996)
1996
-
[17]
Woehlke, A
G. Woehlke, A. K. Ruby, C. L. Hart, B. Ly, N. Hom-Booher, and R. D. Vale, Microtubule interaction site of the kinesin mo- tor, Cell90, 207 (1997)
1997
-
[18]
Howard, Mechanics of motor proteins, inPhysics of Bio- molecules and Cells(Springer, 2002) pp
J. Howard, Mechanics of motor proteins, inPhysics of Bio- molecules and Cells(Springer, 2002) pp. 69–94
2002
-
[19]
J. A. Spudich and S. Sivaramakrishnan, Myosin VI: an innova- tive motor that challenged the swinging lever arm hypothesis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.11, 128 (2010)
2010
-
[20]
Rastogi, M
K. Rastogi, M. S. Puliyakodan, V . Pandey, S. Nath, and R. Elan- govan, Maximum limit to the number of myosin II motors par- ticipating in processive sliding of actin, Sci. Rep.6, 1 (2016)
2016
-
[21]
J. M. Laakso, J. H. Lewis, H. Shuman, and E. M. Ostap, Myosin I can act as a molecular force sensor, Science321, 133 (2008)
2008
-
[22]
K. I. Schimert, B. G. Budaitis, D. N. Reinemann, and K. J. Ver- hey, Intracellular cargo transport by single-headed kinesin mo- tors, PNAS116, 6152 (2019)
2019
-
[23]
Leibler and D
S. Leibler and D. A. Huse, Porters versus rowers: a unified stochastic model of motor proteins, J. Cell Biol.121, 1357 (1993)
1993
-
[24]
C. S. Peskin and G. Oster, Coordinated hydrolysis explains the mechanical behavior of kinesin, Biophys. J.68 4 Suppl, 202S (1995)
1995
-
[25]
Jülicher, A
F. Jülicher, A. Ajdari, and J. Prost, Modeling molecular motors, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 1269 (1997)
1997
-
[26]
Keller and C
D. Keller and C. Bustamante, The mechanochemistry of molec- ular motors, Biophys. J.78, 541 (2000)
2000
-
[27]
Reimann, Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilib- rium, Phys
P. Reimann, Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilib- rium, Phys. Rep.361, 57 (2002)
2002
-
[28]
A. I. Brown and D. A. Sivak, Pulling cargo increases the preci- sion of molecular motor progress, Europhys. Lett.126, 40004 (2019)
2019
-
[29]
J. Xing, J. C. Liao, and G. Oster, Making ATP, PNAS102, 16536 (2005)
2005
-
[30]
Kanada and K
R. Kanada and K. Sasaki, Theoretical model for motility and processivity of two-headed molecular motors, Phys. Rev. E67, 061917 (2003)
2003
-
[31]
Valleriani, S
A. Valleriani, S. Liepelt, and R. Lipowsky, Dwell time distribu- tions for kinesin’s mechanical steps, Europhys. Lett.82, 28011 (2008)
2008
-
[32]
A. B. Kolomeisky and B. Widom, A simplified “ratchet” model of molecular motors, J. Stat. Phys.93, 633 (1998)
1998
-
[33]
M. E. Fisher and A. B. Kolomeisky, Molecular motors and the forces they exert, Physica A274, 241 (1999)
1999
-
[34]
A. B. Kolomeisky and M. E. Fisher, Periodic sequential kinetic models with jumping, branching and deaths, Physica A279, 1 (2000)
2000
-
[35]
A. B. Kolomeisky and M. E. Fisher, Extended kinetic models with waiting-time distributions: Exact results, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 10867 (2000)
2000
-
[36]
A. B. Kolomeisky, Exact results for parallel-chain kinetic mod- els of biological transport, J. Chem. Phys.115, 7253 (2001)
2001
-
[37]
M. E. Fisher and A. B. Kolomeisky, Simple mechanochemistry describes the dynamics of kinesin molecules, PNAS98, 7748 (2001)
2001
-
[38]
A. B. Kolomeisky and M. E. Fisher, A simple kinetic model describes the processivity of myosin-V, Biophys. J.84, 1642 (2003). 15
2003
-
[39]
A. B. Kolomeisky, E. B. Stukalin, and A. A. Popov, Under- standing mechanochemical coupling in kinesins using first- passage-time processes, Phys. Rev. E71, 031902 (2005)
2005
-
[40]
E. B. Stukalin, H. Phillips, and A. B. Kolomeisky, Coupling of two motor proteins: a new motor can move faster, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 238101 (2005)
2005
-
[41]
M. E. Fisher and Y . C. Kim, Kinesin crouches to sprint but re- sists pushing, PNAS102, 16209 (2005)
2005
-
[42]
Y . C. Kim and M. E. Fisher, Vectorial loading of processive motor proteins, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter17, S3821 (2005)
2005
-
[43]
Qian, Cycle kinetics, steady state thermodynamics and mo- tors: a paradigm for living matter physics, J
H. Qian, Cycle kinetics, steady state thermodynamics and mo- tors: a paradigm for living matter physics, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter17, S3783 (2005)
2005
-
[44]
E. B. Stukalin and A. B. Kolomeisky, Transport of single molecules along periodic parallel lattices with coupling, J. Chem. Phys.124, 204901 (2006)
2006
-
[45]
Landauer, Information is physical, Phys
R. Landauer, Information is physical, Phys. Today44, 23 (1991)
1991
-
[46]
J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Thermody- namics of information, Nat. Phys.11, 131 (2015)
2015
-
[47]
Szilard, On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic sys- tem by the intervention of intelligent beings, Behav
L. Szilard, On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic sys- tem by the intervention of intelligent beings, Behav. Sci.9, 301 (1964)
1964
-
[48]
Toyabe, T
S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyuki, and M. Sano, Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conver- sion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality, Nat. Phys.6, 988 (2010)
2010
-
[49]
P. A. Camati, J. P. S. Peterson, T. B. Batalhao, K. Micadei, A. M. Souza, R. E. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and R. M. Serra, Ex- perimental rectification of entropy production by Maxwell’s de- mon in a quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 240502 (2016)
2016
-
[50]
J. V . Koski, A. Kutvonen, I. M. Khaymovich, T. Ala-Nissila, and J. P. Pekola, On-chip Maxwell’s demon as an information- powered refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 260602 (2015)
2015
-
[51]
Cottet, S
N. Cottet, S. Jezouin, L. Bretheau, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, Q. Ficheux, J. Anders, A. Auffeves, R. Azouit, P. Rouchon, and B. Huard, Observing a quantum Maxwell demon at work, PNAS USA114, 7561 (2017)
2017
-
[52]
Masuyama, K
Y . Masuyama, K. Funo, Y . Murashita, A. Noguchi, S. Kono, Y . Tabuchi, R. Yamazaki, M. Ueda, and Y . Nakamura, Information-to-work conversion by Maxwell’s demon in a su- perconducting circuit quantum electrodynamical system, Nat. Commun.9, 1291 (2018)
2018
-
[53]
J. V . Koski, V . F. Maisi, J. P. Pekola, and D. V . Averin, Exper- imental realization of a Szilard engine with a single electron, PNAS USA111, 13786 (2014)
2014
-
[54]
Chida, S
K. Chida, S. Desai, K. Nishiguchi, and A. Fujiwara, Power gen- erator driven by Maxwell’s demon, Nat. Commun.8, 15301 (2017)
2017
-
[55]
Admon, S
T. Admon, S. Rahav, and Y . Roichman, Experimental realiza- tion of an information machine with tunable temporal correla- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 180601 (2018)
2018
-
[56]
Goerlich, L
R. Goerlich, L. Hoek, O. Chor, S. Rahav, and Y . Roichman, Ex- perimental realizations of information engines: Beyond proof of concept, Europhys. Lett.149, 61001 (2025)
2025
-
[57]
Baldovin, I
M. Baldovin, I. Ben Yedder, C. A. Plata, D. Raynal, L. Rondin, E. Trizac, and A. Prados, Optimal control of levitated nanopar- ticles through finite-stiffness confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 097102 (2025)
2025
-
[58]
A. P. Castro, J. Bechhoefer, and D. A. Sivak, Harnessing higher- dimensional fluctuations in an information engine, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 047101 (2026)
2026
-
[59]
Tsuruyama, Rna polymerase is a unique Maxwell’s demon that converts its transcribing genetic information to free energy for its movement, Eur
T. Tsuruyama, Rna polymerase is a unique Maxwell’s demon that converts its transcribing genetic information to free energy for its movement, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 604 (2023)
2023
-
[60]
M. P. Leighton and D. A. Sivak, Inferring subsystem efficien- cies in bipartite molecular machines, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 178401 (2023)
2023
-
[61]
R. D. Vale, The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular trans- port, Cell112, 467 (2003)
2003
-
[62]
Ehrich, S
J. Ehrich, S. Still, and D. A. Sivak, Energetic cost of feedback control, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023080 (2023)
2023
-
[63]
Ehrich and D
J. Ehrich and D. A. Sivak, Energy and information flows in au- tonomous systems, Front. Phys.11, 1108357 (2023)
2023
-
[64]
B. M. Bensel, M. S. Woody, S. Pyrpassopoulos, others, and E. M. Ostap, The mechanochemistry of the kinesin-2 KIF3AC heterodimer is related to strain-dependent kinetic properties of KIF3A and KIF3C, PNAS USA117, 15632 (2020)
2020
-
[65]
W. Hua, J. Chung, and J. Gelles, Distinguishing inchworm and hand-over-hand processive kinesin movement by neck rotation measurements, Science295, 844 (2002)
2002
-
[66]
Ciudad, J
A. Ciudad, J. M. Sancho, and A. M. Lacasta, Dynamics of an inchworm nano-walker, Physica A371, 25 (2006)
2006
-
[67]
W. C. Wareham and D. A. Sivak, Multiparameter optimal con- trol of F1-ATPase, Phys. Rev. E111, 064410 (2025)
2025
-
[68]
J. M. Horowitz, Multipartite information flow for multiple Maxwell demons, J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp.2015, P03006 (2015)
2015
-
[69]
Goychuk, Anomalous transport of subdiffusing cargos by sin- gle kinesin motors: the role of mechano–chemical coupling and anharmonicity of tether, Phys
I. Goychuk, Anomalous transport of subdiffusing cargos by sin- gle kinesin motors: the role of mechano–chemical coupling and anharmonicity of tether, Phys. Biol.12, 016013 (2015), pub- lished 30 January 2015
2015
-
[70]
Kjelstrup, J
S. Kjelstrup, J. M. Rubi, I. P. Pagonabarraga, and D. Be- deaux, Mesoscopic non-equilibrium thermodynamic analysis of molecular motors, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.15, 19405 (2013), published 28 November 2013
2013
-
[71]
M. P. Leighton, J. Ehrich, and D. A. Sivak, Information arbi- trage in bipartite heat engines, Phys. Rev. X14, 041038 (2024)
2024
-
[72]
D. L. Coy, M. Wagenbach, and J. Howard, Kinesin takes one 8-nm step for each ATP that it hydrolyzes, J. Biol. Chem.274, 3667 (1999)
1999
-
[73]
Komori, A
Y . Komori, A. H. Iwane, and T. Yanagida, Myosin-V makes two brownian 90 degrees rotations per 36-nm step, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.14, 968 (2007)
2007
-
[74]
van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992)
N. van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992)
1992
-
[75]
Svoboda and S
K. Svoboda and S. M. Block, Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules, Cell77, 773 (1994)
1994
-
[76]
Pietzonka, A
P. Pietzonka, A. C. Barato, and U. Seifert, Universal bound on the efficiency of molecular motors, J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. 2016, 124004 (2016), special Issue on Statphys 26
2016
-
[77]
Wang and G
H. Wang and G. Oster, The Stokes efficiency for molecular mo- tors and its applications, Europhys. Lett.57, 134 (2002)
2002
-
[78]
A. J. Hunt, F. Gittes, and J. Howard, The force exerted by a single kinesin molecule against a viscous load, Biophys. J.67, 766 (1994)
1994
-
[79]
M. P. Leighton and D. A. Sivak, Performance scaling and trade- offs for collective motor-driven transport, New J. Phys.24, 013009 (2022), published 4 January 2022
2022
-
[80]
Y . A. Makhnovskii, V . M. Rozenbaum, D.-Y . Yang, S. H. Lin, and T. Y . Tsong, Flashing ratchet model with high efficiency, Phys. Rev. E69, 021102 (2004)
2004
-
[81]
G. Gu, D. Alvarez, J. Strahan, A. Albaugh, E. Penoc- chio, and T. R. Gingrich, It takes two to make a thing go right: Boosting current in coupled motors, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2601.09907 (2026)
2026 doi
-
[82]
Higuchi, E
H. Higuchi, E. Muto, Y . Inoue, and T. Yanagida, Kinetics of force generation by single kinesin molecules activated by laser 16 photolysis of caged ATP, PNAS94, 4395 (1997)
1997
-
[83]
J. O. Wirth, L. Scheiderer, T. Engelhardt, J. Engelhardt, J. Matthias, and S. W. Hell, Minflux dissects the unimpeded walking of kinesin-1, Science379, 1004 (2023)
2023
-
[84]
Hänggi, P
P. Hänggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 251 (1990)
1990
-
[85]
G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721 (1999)
1999
-
[86]
Risken,The F okker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solu- tion and Applications, Springer Series in Synergetics, V ol
H. Risken,The F okker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solu- tion and Applications, Springer Series in Synergetics, V ol. 18 (Springer, 1989)
1989
-
[87]
A. D. Mehta, R. S. Rock, M. Rief, J. A. Spudich, M. S. Mooseker, and R. E. Cheney, Myosin-V is a processive actin- based motor, Nature400, 590 (1999)
1999
-
[88]
T. K. Saha, J. N. E. Lucero, J. Ehrich, D. A. Sivak, and J. Bech- hoefer, Maximizing power and velocity of an information en- gine, PNAS118, e2023356118 (2021)
2021
-
[89]
Patrón Castro, (2026), GitHub repository
A. Patrón Castro, (2026), GitHub repository
2026
Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.